Relation with Contract Line Item and Billing Plan

Can a Billing Plan have more than one Contract (Sales Document) Line Item ?
To detail, for example, a Billing plan is X and it has three Plan Items 1,2,3. Can there be situation where Billing Plan X:Item 1 is set up for Contract A:Item 10 and rest of the Items i.e. Billing Plan X:Item 2,3 are set up for a different Contract B:Item 20 ?

yes , we can

Similar Messages

Relation between Invoice Line items and Accounting Line item

Dear All,
My requirement is to print all the invoice documents and it's tax values like cenvat, Ecess, BED and VAT.
I have to fetch these tax details from BSEG table .
I' am getting Invoice number ( RBKP-BELNR ) from BKPF-AWTKEY .
Can any one please tell me how to relate the Invoice line items and Accounting document line items..
Any BAPI or FM is there to retrieve these data.
Please do needful in this regard.

Hi,
from table bseg - field Koart
K = Vendor
D = Customer
S = G/L account here tax lines identify with buzid = T
or take table bset for taxes
Andreas

To track which line item the billing plan date changed.

Hi All.
I have a requirment of tracking changes done for the billing plan date and whenever i change the billing plan date it will be reflected in the FPLA table. But i was not able to track to which line item of the subscription/order the billing plan date changed.
In the FPLA table there is a relation to the VBELN(subscription/order) only not POSRN(line item) is there.How can i track to which line item it got changed.
Thanks for your help.
Thanks,
Neslin.

Hi,
There should be entries in FPLTC for FPLNR found in table FPLA. Try from SE16, enter FPLNR preceded by zeros so that the total length is 10 and execute.For example, FPLNR is 10, enter 0000000010.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Nupur

SC with Limit line items and Desc requirements _Incorrect Overall Limit

Hi,
When i create SC ,combining both limit items and non-catalog items (desc requirement), i am getting my PR created.
However, i observed that for Limit lines in PurReq, the expected value & Overall limit amounts are not being transferred correctly.
Overall limit is also showing as equal to expected value. This is happening only when i combine limit and full text lines together in a sc. It seems like a bug. We are on SRM 55 and patch 11.
Appreciate any inputs.
Thanks
Krish

Hi Karthik,
Thanks for your reply. I already checked these notes and they are not relevant for my issue.
My issue is like this. SC has got 4 lines and out of them 2 are Limits and 2 of them are describe req's lines.
for one of Limit line, overall limit is 1000$ and expected value is $500.
where as in the Purreq, i am getting both overall limit and expected value as $500 itself. basically overall limit is overwritten with expected value.
I found very old note something simillar to this issue: 304382.. its the otherway happening in my case.
Thanks
Krish

Can we create multiple billing document from delivery with single line item

can we create multiple billing document from delivery with single line item

Hi
Please check the link
[can v create multiple billing document from delivery with single line item]
and as Lakshmi said, check the forum before posting an issue.
Regards
AA

Add or Delete Line Item in Billing Creation (VF01)

Hi,
During the billing document creation (VF01) for Order-Related Billing (example: Doc Type F5 - Pro Forma for Order), can you
manually add or delete line items?
Let's say if Sales Order was created with 3 line items and only 2 line items should be included in Billing Doc F5. During the
billing document creation (VF01), it automatically copies all 3 line items. How can I delete the line item that I don't want
to be included in Billing Doc F5? Only way that I know is to put a billing block on Sales Order item so it won't automatically
copied into a billing document. But this process is inconvenient. After F5 document is created, my user will then need to
remember to go back to Sales order and remove a billing block from that line item.
Also vice verse, can an item be manually added to a billing document during the creation mode (VF01)? Is there somewhere
in the configuration that I can change to allow this? Or is it a standart SAP practice all items on a billind document have to
be Order or Delivery-Related?
Thanks,
Michelle

Hi,
While creating the invoice via VF01. Please go to selection list icon. this will take to you another screen. here you can select the line item you want to copy/bill.
Please try and let us know.
Thanks,
Vishal

BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE u0096 Duplication of line item in billing docume

Hi All,
I am using BAPI <b>BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE</b> to create billing document. Creation of billing document is fine, but issue is I am passing individual line item along with <b>quantity</b> to be billed. But whats happening is if I got 3 item line in sales order with quantity 1-3-5, billing document getting created 3 quantity 1, 3 quantity 3 and 3 quantity 5. So I end up with 9 line item on billing document which is incorrect.
Please see the code below which I am using, can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong here. I basically need to create 3 billing line item with respective quantity I pass. Any hint is much appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Tim
loop at GT_INIT_ITAB2 into GS_INIT_ITAB2.
    select single * into gs_vbak
                    from vbak
                    where vbeln = GS_INIT_ITAB2-VBELN.
    select single * into gs_vbap
                   from vbap
                   where vbeln = GS_INIT_ITAB2-VBELN AND
                         posnr = GS_INIT_ITAB2-posnr.
    select single * into gs_mara
                   from mara
                   where matnr = gs_vbap-matnr.
    refresh GT_BILLINGDATAIN.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-SALESORG   = gs_vbak-vkorg.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-DISTR_CHAN = gs_vbak-vtweg.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-DIVISION   = gs_vbak-spart.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-DOC_TYPE   = GS_INIT_ITAB2-auart.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-ORDBILLTYP = p_fkart.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-SOLD_TO    = GS_INIT_ITAB2-kunnr.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-ITEM_CATEG = GS_INIT_ITAB2-pstyv.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-REQ_QTY    = GS_INIT_ITAB2-kwmeng.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-SALES_UNIT = gs_vbap-vrkme.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-CURRENCY   = gs_vbak-waerk.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-SHORT_TEXT = 'Test'.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-BILL_DATE   = gl_date.
write GS_INIT_ITAB2-afdat to GT_BILLINGDATAIN-BILL_DATE ddmmyy.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-BILL_DATE = GS_INIT_ITAB2-afdat.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-PRICE_DATE = SY-DATUM.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-REF_DOC    = GS_INIT_ITAB2-VBELN.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-DOC_NUMBER = GS_INIT_ITAB2-VBELN.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-ITM_NUMBER = GS_INIT_ITAB2-POSNR.
GT_BILLINGDATAIN-ORIGINDOC = GS_INIT_ITAB2-VBELN.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-ITEM       = GS_INIT_ITAB2-POSNR.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-NO_MATMAST = co_x.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-COUNTRY    = 'AUS'.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-MATERIAL   = gl_matnr.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-TAXCL_1MAT = '1'.
    GT_BILLINGDATAIN-REF_DOC_CA = 'C'.
    append GT_BILLINGDATAIN.
endloop.
Prepare for BAPI call
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE'
      EXPORTING
        CREATORDATAIN         = GS_CREATORDATAIN
      TESTRUN               = co_x
      POSTING               = co_x
      TABLES
        BILLINGDATAIN         = GT_BILLINGDATAIN
    CONDITIONDATAIN       = GT_CONDITIONDATAIN
    CCARDDATAIN           =
    TEXTDATAIN            =
    ERRORS                =
        RETURN                = GT_RETURN
        SUCCESS               = GT_SUCCESS
    clear gl_return.
    loop at GT_RETURN.
      if GT_RETURN-type EQ 'E' OR
         GT_RETURN-type EQ 'A'.
        move: GT_RETURN to gl_return.
        exit.
      endif.
    endloop.
    if gl_return is initial.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
     EXPORTING
      WAIT   = '1'
        IMPORTING
          RETURN = gt_return_commit.
    endif.

Hi,
Check this code...For creating billing document from sales order..
TABLES: vbak.
PARAMETERS: p_vbeln LIKE vbak-vbeln OBLIGATORY,
            p_fkart LIKE vbrk-fkart.
DATA:
s_vbsk LIKE vbsk.
DATA:
xkomfk     LIKE     komfk    OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
xkomv     LIKE     komv     OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
xthead     LIKE     theadvb OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
xvbfs     LIKE     vbfs     OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
xvbpa     LIKE     vbpavb   OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
xvbrk     LIKE     vbrkvb   OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
xvbrp     LIKE     vbrpvb   OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
xvbss     LIKE     vbss     OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM vbak
       WHERE vbeln = p_vbeln.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE s208(00) WITH 'Invalid vbeln'.
LEAVE LIST-PROCESSING.
ENDIF.
CALL FUNCTION 'RV_INVOICE_REFRESH'
     EXPORTING
          with_posting = 'B'
     TABLES
          xkomfk       = xkomfk
          xkomv        = xkomv
          xthead       = xthead
          xvbfs        = xvbfs
          xvbpa        = xvbpa
          xvbrk        = xvbrk
          xvbrp        = xvbrp
          xvbss        = xvbss.
DATA: BEGIN OF t_vbap OCCURS 0,
        vbeln TYPE vbeln,
        posnr TYPE posnr,
      END OF t_vbap.
SELECT vbeln posnr INTO TABLE t_vbap
       FROM vbap WHERE vbeln = p_vbeln.
LOOP AT t_vbap.
Fill the values.
xkomfk-mandt = sy-mandt.
xkomfk-vbeln = p_vbeln.
xkomfk-posnr = t_vbap-posnr.
xkomfk-vbtyp = vbak-vbtyp.
xkomfk-seldat = sy-datum.
xkomfk-fkart = p_fkart.
xkomfk-fkimg = '1.000'.
xkomfk-vrkme = 'EA'.
APPEND xkomfk.
ENDLOOP.
CALL FUNCTION 'RV_INVOICE_CREATE'
     EXPORTING
          vbsk_i       = s_vbsk
          with_posting = 'B'
     IMPORTING
          vbsk_e       = s_vbsk
     TABLES
          xkomfk       = xkomfk
          xkomv        = xkomv
          xthead       = xthead
          xvbfs        = xvbfs
          xvbpa        = xvbpa
          xvbrk        = xvbrk
          xvbrp        = xvbrp
          xvbss        = xvbss.
READ TABLE xvbfs WITH KEY msgty = 'S'.
WRITE:/ sy-subrc.
WRITE:/ xvbfs-msgv1,xvbfs-msgv2,xvbfs-msgv3.
Thanks,
Naren

Header, Line Item and Cache Techniques Using Hashed Tables

Hi,
How can I work with header, line item, and a cache techniques using hashed tables?
Thanks,
Shah.

Hi,
Here is an example to clarify the ideas:
In general, every time you have a header-> lines structure you have a unique key for the lines that has at least header key plus one or more fields. I'll make use of this fact.
I'll try to put an example of how to work with header -> line items and a cache technique using hashed tables.
Just suppose that you need a list of all the material movements '101'-'901' for a certain range of dates in mkpf-budat. We'll extract these fields:
mkpf-budat
mkpf-mblnr,
mseg-lifnr,
lfa1-name1,
mkpf-xblnr,
mseg-zeile
mseg-charg,
mseg-matnr,
makt-maktx,
mseg-erfmg,
mseg-erfme.
I'll use two cache: one for maintaining lfa1 related data and the other to maintain makt related data. Also I'll only describe the data gathering part. The showing of the data is left to your own imagination.
The main ideas are:
1. As this is an example I won't use inner join. If properly desingned may be faster .
2. I'll use four hashed tables: ht_mkpf, ht_mseg, ht_lfa1 and ht_makt to get data into memory. Then I'll collect all the data I want to list into a fifth table ht_lst.
3. ht_mkpf should have (at least) mkpf's primary key fields : mjahr, mblnr.
4. ht_mseg should have (at least) mseg primary key fields: mjahr mblnr and zeile.
5. ht_lfa1 should have an unique key by lifnr.
6. ht_makt should have an unique key by matnr.
7. I prefer using with header line because makes the code easier to follow and understand. The waste of time isn't quite significant (in my experience at least).
Note: When I've needed to work from header to item lines then I added a counter in ht_header that maintains the count of item lines, and I added an id in the ht_lines so I can read straight by key a given item line. But this is very tricky to implement and to follow. (Nevertheless I've programmed it and it works well.)
The data will be read in this sequence:
select data from mkpf into table ht_mkpf
select data from mseg int table ht_mseg having in count all the data in ht_mkpf
loop at ht_mseg (lines)
filter unwanted records
read cache for lfa1 and makt
fill in ht_lst and collect data
endloop.
tables
tables: mkpf, mseg, lfa1, makt.
internal tables:
data: begin of wa_mkpf, "header
mblnr like mkpf-mblnr,
mjahr like mkpf-mjahr,
budat like mkpf-budat,
xblnr like mkpf-xblnr,
end of wa_mkpf.
data ht_mkpf like hashed table of wa_mkpf
with unique key mblnr mjahr
with header line.
data: begin of wa_mseg, " line items
mblnr like mseg-mblnr,
mjahr like mseg-mjahr,
zeile like mseg-zeile,
bwart like mseg-bwart,
charg like mseg-charg,
matnr like mseg-matnr,
lifnr like mseg-lifnr,
erfmg like mseg-erfmg,
erfme like mseg-erfme,
end of wa_mseg,
data ht_mseg like hashed table of wa_mseg
with unique key mblnr mjahr zeile
with header line.
data: begin of wa_lfa1,
lifnr like lfa1-lifnr,
name1 like lfa1-name1,
end of wa_lfa1,
data ht_lfa1 like hashed table of wa_lfa1
with unique key lifnr
with header line.
data: begin of wa_makt,
matnr like makt-matnr,
maktx like makt-maktx,
end of wa_makt.
data: ht_makt like hashed table of wa_makt
with unique key matnr
with header line.
result table
data: begin of wa_lst, "
budat like mkpf-budat,
mblnr like mseg-mblnr,
lifnr like mseg-lifnr,
name1 like lfa1-name1,
xblnr like mkpf-xblnr,
zeile like mseg-zeile,
charg like mseg-charg,
matnr like mseg-matnr,
maktx like makt-maktx,
erfmg like mseg-erfmg,
erfme like mseg-erfme,
mjahr like mseg-mjahr,
end of wa_mseg,
data: ht_lst like hashed table of wa_lst
with unique key mblnr mjahr zeile
with header line.
data: g_lines type i.
select-options: so_budat for mkpf-budat default sy-datum.
select-options: so_matnr for mseg-matnr.
form get_data.
select mblnr mjahr budat xblnr
into table ht_mkfp
from mkpf
where budat in so_budat.
describe table ht_mkpf lines g_lines.
if lines > 0.
select mblnr mjahr zeile bwart charg
matnr lifnr erfmg erfme
into table ht_mseg
from mseg
for all entries in ht_mkpf
where mblnr = ht_mkpf-mblnr
and mjahr = ht_mjahr.
endif.
loop at ht_mseg.
filter unwanted data
check ht_mseg-bwart = '101' or ht_mseg-bwart = '901'.
check ht_mseg-matnr in so_matnr.
read header line.
read table ht_mkpf with table key mblnr = ht_mseg-mblnr
mjahr = ht_mseg-mjahr.
clear ht_lst.
note : this may be faster if you specify field by field.
move-corresponding ht_mkpf to ht_lst.
move-corresponding ht_mseg to ht_lst.
perform read_lfa1 using ht_mseg-lifnr changing ht_lst-name1.
perform read_makt using ht_mseg-matnr changing ht_lst-maktx.
insert table ht_lst.
endloop.
implementation of cache for lfa1.
form read_lfa1 using p_lifnr changing p_name1.
read table ht_lfa1 with table key lifnr = p_lifnr
transporting name1.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
clear ht_lfa1.
ht_lfa1-lifnr = p_lifnr.
select single name1
into ht_lfa1-name1
from lfa1
where lifnr = p_lifnr.
if sy-subrc <> 0. ht_lfa1-name1 = 'n/a in lfa1'. endif.
insert table ht_lfa1.
endif.
p_name1 = ht_lfa1-name1.
endform.
implementation of cache for makt
form read_makt using p_matnr changing p_maktx.
read table ht_makt with table key matnr = p_matnr
transporting maktx.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
ht_makt-matnr = p_matnr.
select single maktx into ht_matk-maktx
from makt
where spras = sy-langu
and matnr = p_matnr.
if sy-subrc <> 0. ht_makt-maktx = 'n/a in makt'. endif.
insert table ht_makt.
endif.
p_maktx = ht_makt-maktx.
endform.
Reward points if found helpfull...
Cheers,
Siva.

Partial goods receipt for PO with multiple line items

Hello All,
While doing MIGO, for a PO with multiple line items, if one line item is having error, will we be able to go ahead with goods receipt? Or entire material document is blocked for doing MIGO?
We will be doing a development - in case if there is problem in goods receipt (checking of any parameter, and if it is missing - we will be posting error message)...is it possible to ahead with next line item and still post the material document?
If partial goods receipt if possible for PO with multiple line items, how do we do it?
Regards,
RJS

Hi
While doing MIGO, for a PO with multiple line items, if one line item is having error, will we be able to go ahead with goods receipt? Or entire material document is blocked for doing MIGO?
No. You cannot post the MIGO, if even one of the PO line item is having problem or giving error.
We will be doing a development - in case if there is problem in goods receipt (checking of any parameter, and if it is missing - we will be posting error message)...is it possible to ahead with next line item and still post the material document?
If you skip a line irem and do GR with next line item, how will you match quantity & value with the vendor Invoice at LIV ?
If partial goods receipt if possible for PO with multiple line items, how do we do it?
Partial goods receipt is possible for PO line items. That means, if PO has 100 qty for line item 1 then you can do GR for 50 now and 50 later depending on the vendors delivery.
Hope this is what you mean by "Partial Goods Receipt".
Edited by: Arun R on May 10, 2010 2:03 PM

SCC question - how can I get a list of all line items and minor line items associated with a single contract?

Current;y have to expand each major line item and check all the minor line items, I just want a list of SNs associated with the contract. Any way to get this mailed to me every month?

Hi
I am sorry to see you are having problems
I suggest you contact the forum mods they should be able to get this problem sorted for you this is a link to them http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951
They normally reply by email or phone directly to you within 3 working days they will take personal ownership of your problem until resolved and will keep you informed of progress
They are a UK based BT specialist team who have a good record at getting problems solved
This is a customer to customer self help forum the only BT presence here are the forum moderators
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Relation between Payment term and Billing Plan

Hi All,
I have gone through series of thread on Milestone billing and the Billing plan concept is understood but still I have a confusion regarding the relation between Payment Term that we maintain in OBB8 and the Billing plan that we maintain. practically both seems same.
For ex. Milestone Linked plan where 30% payment to be received on the completion of X work and 70% on the completion of Z work. what should be the payment term for this kind of milestone billing?
Please suggest.
Thanks in Advance.
Binita Joshi

Hi,
First there is one major difference between payment terms and billing plan.
Payment terms will come into effect once billing is done, based on the conditions of payment terms system decides whether a certain line item is not due or overdue.
Billing plan on the other hand decides when to bill the first installment and when to bill second installment and final payment etc.
For example:
for a order with billing plan has total value of INR 1000
date                         Mile stone             percentage        Amount
21.10.2011             Advance               10%                       100
31.10.2011             installation              30 %                     300
15.11.2011             Handing over         40 %                    400
30.11.2011             Final invoice           20%                      200
System will create 4 invoices according to billing plan.
Once the bill is created according to payment terms FBL5n will show the status as not due/ overdue
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sharan

Badi ISU_PRODUCT_CHANGE and creation of a new contract line item

Hello Gurus;
I have this requirement: Once a contract gets close the ending date (30 days before) i need to automatically renew the contract. In order to do that i thought that an action in the Contract Item might get the job done and browsing i found that badi ISU_PRODUCT_CHANGE does almost what i need even if it creates a new contract line item with a new product and this is not good for me... Does anybody know if there is a better Badi matching with my requirements or i have to "modify" the ISU_PRODUCT_CHANGE? I hope my question was clear if you need more specifics please ask me...
Thank you very much.
Fabio

You can create a new costing variant with a valuation variant that points to inforecords for material prices. Go to OKKN t-code and create the required configuration and start using the new costing variant to measure the current cost of making vehicles.

Where/ how do I set SNP to create Planned orders with multiple line items?

Hi
Currently our SNP is generating planned orders on a daily basis, it creates a single order with a single line item per location.
Where/ how do set SNP to create planned orders on a daily basis to generate a single order with multiple line items per location, so therefore one planned order with multiple line items for a single location.
Thanx
Keegan

Hi Keegan,
In SNP (APO) it is not possible to create order with multiple line items.
But you can do some settings so that while planning system can do aggregation and disaggregation.
But your requirment should be set on Aggregation/Dis-aggregation logic.
Please follow the follwing links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm2007/helpdata/en/2c/c557e9e330cc46b8e440fb3999ca51/content.htm
Aggregation:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm2007/helpdata/en/42/f731d078e73ee4e10000000a1553f6/content.htm
Disaggregation:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm2007/helpdata/en/a6/ebefaf32e22e468355da304cc59387/content.htm
Please be sure that the setting of this logic will be at planning area level.
You can't change aggregation/disaggregation logic further.
Regards,
Santosh

Buyer change the PO line items and end up with Awaiting Approval status.

Can you please help to look into this issue.
1.Buyer change the PO line items and end up with Awaiting Approval status.
2. But user claim that she got enough limit and should not route to her manager's approval. Also check with her manager and this PO do not exist his queue.
Any clue or tips on how to investigate on this issue. All your tips are appreciated,
-Rick

You cannot change these POs because their changed version has status
'Deleted'. My proposal to fix them will be the following:
You will have to set changed version as closed(DOC_CLOSED set to X)
and in active version set DOC_CLOSED to space.
__-For the above statement, Can you guys please let me know, which table DOC_CLOSED belongs to and what are the steps to do this, as i come from a functional back ground.__

SAPF150D-Dunning Notice Print - With Update of Line Items and Master Record

When I am running this program SAPF150D(Dunning Notice Print - With Update of Line Items and Master Records) with a variant containing run date, runc id, update mode, pimmed & pcount; the job is failing to execute. It is giving message like,
"The field symbol is no longer assigned because there was an attempt makde previously in a Unicode program to set the field symbol using ASSIGN with offset and/or length specification. Here, the memory addressed by the offset/length specification was not within the allowed area."
"GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED_RANGE" "SAPF150D" or "F150DFS0" "SORTFELDER_ERMITTELN"

Hi,
Search for routine FORM SORTFELDER_ERMITTELN
in SAPF150D.
Put a breakpoint in statement
ASSIGN (T047F-FELDN) TO <H1>.
in above routine and debug to the point where error is occuring.
Most likely there is a mismatch in the length assigned to some field FELDN in table T047F.
In that case, simply change the T047F-LENGT field accordingly in change mode.
Cheers,
Vikram
Edited by: Vikram Jalali on May 27, 2008 5:56 PM

Relation with Contract Line Item and Billing Plan

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for