Scaling in Indesign

Why does my peace of script doesn't work as it should be?
Like it is now, the scale syntax doesn't understand the returned scalefactor. If I replace VWidthscale by {50} then indd scales the selected items to 25%.
This is a small peace of a bigger script, so normally "tell application ..." sentence isn't in.
--Put in the scale factor
set VWidthscale to (text returned of (display dialog "Scalefactor widt" default answer "100")) as string
set VHeightscale to (text returned of (display dialog "Scalefactor height" default answer "100")) as string
tell application "Adobe InDesign CS4"
select all
set horizontal scale of selection to VWidthscale
set vertical scale of selection to VHeightscale
select nothing
end tell

Hello
I downloaded sample scripts and looked into the PlaceMultipagePDF.applescript :
indesigncs4_samplescripts.zip
It seems that you have inserted some code into the myPlacePDF() handler and have not adjusted its flow control accordingly. (You need to break the loop promptly when the vDone is set to true)
Try something like the codes below :
--CODE1
--Place pdf
on vPlacePDF(vDocument, vPage, VPDF)
tell application "Adobe InDesign CS4"
set vDone to false
set PDF crop of PDF place preferences to crop media
set vCounter to 1
repeat until vDone is true
repeat 1 times -- # added
tell vDocument
if vCounter > 1 then
set vPage to make page at after vPage
end if
end tell
set page number of PDF place preferences to vCounter
get page number of PDF place preferences
tell vPage
set vPDFPage to place VPDF
set vPDFPage to item 1 of vPDFPage
end tell
get properties of PDF attributes of vPDFPage
if vCounter = 1 then
set vFirstPage to page number of PDF attributes of vPDFPage
else
if page number of PDF attributes of vPDFPage = vFirstPage then
tell vPage to delete
set vDone to true
exit repeat -- # added (exit inner one time loop; skip the rest of this iteration of inner loop)
end if
end if
--Put in the scale factor
set mydoc to active document
tell mydoc
select all
set absolute horizontal scale of selection to 50
set absolute vertical scale of selection to 50
select nothing
end tell
--Center
-- page size: top, left, bottom, right.
set {b, a, d, c} to bounds of page 1 of document 1
set mySelection to selection
set mydoc to active document
tell mydoc
select all
-- size of the item
set {y1, x1, y2, x2} to geometric bounds of selection
--center
move selection to {(c - x2 + x1) / 2, (d - y2 + y1) / 2}
select nothing
end tell
-- end Center
end repeat -- # added (end of inner one time loop)
set vCounter to vCounter + 1
end repeat
-- end place pdf
display alert "finished!"
end tell
end vPlacePDF
--END OF CODE1
Or more simply :
--CODE2
--Place pdf
on vPlacePDF(vDocument, vPage, VPDF)
tell application "Adobe InDesign CS4"
set PDF crop of PDF place preferences to crop media
set vCounter to 1
--set vDone to false -- # commented out (not used)
--repeat until vDone is true -- # replaced with the below
repeat -- # modified
tell vDocument
if vCounter > 1 then
set vPage to make page at after vPage
end if
end tell
set page number of PDF place preferences to vCounter
get page number of PDF place preferences
tell vPage
set vPDFPage to place VPDF
set vPDFPage to item 1 of vPDFPage
end tell
get properties of PDF attributes of vPDFPage
if vCounter = 1 then
set vFirstPage to page number of PDF attributes of vPDFPage
else
if page number of PDF attributes of vPDFPage = vFirstPage then
tell vPage to delete
--set vDone to true - # commented out (not used)
exit repeat -- # added
end if
end if
--Put in the scale factor
set mydoc to active document
tell mydoc
select all
set absolute horizontal scale of selection to 50
set absolute vertical scale of selection to 50
select nothing
end tell
--Center
-- page size: top, left, bottom, right.
set {b, a, d, c} to bounds of page 1 of document 1
set mySelection to selection
set mydoc to active document
tell mydoc
select all
-- size of the item
set {y1, x1, y2, x2} to geometric bounds of selection
--center
move selection to {(c - x2 + x1) / 2, (d - y2 + y1) / 2}
select nothing
end tell
-- end Center
set vCounter to vCounter + 1
end repeat
-- end place pdf
display alert "finished!"
end tell
end vPlacePDF
--END OF CODE2
Hope this may help,
H
Message was edited by: Hiroto (oops, fixed a typo in the first code)

Similar Messages

  • Changing images to 300dpi within indesign

    Hi again only me, lol
    Within Illustrator have an action set up so i can automatically change the resolution of an image to 300dpi with one click.
    I know Indesign doesnt use actions but is there away of simply setting a script to action this very time saving exercise?
    Andy

    You don't need to do this.
    Make a PDF
    Go to File>Export and in the Compression section of the dialog box there is the option to Downsample All Images to 300 ppi that are above 450.
    However:
    There are scripts to resize images to do this http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/exchange/index.cfm?event=extensionDetail&extid=1833529
    (Window>Automation> Scripts) CS5 it's Under (Window>Utilities>Scripts)
    Installing scripts
    http://indesignsecrets.com/how-to-install-scripts-in-indesign.php
    Why do you want to change all the images to 300 ppi ? There's no need.
    There are two things to look for in the Window>Info Panel
    When you place an image check teh Info Panel
    It will have actual and effective PPI
    Actual will show you the ppi that is resident in the file.
    Effective will show you the PPI in relation to how it was scaled within InDesign
    As long as Effective PPI is 300 ppi or higher then all is fine.
    Generally there is no need to go to open all your images and save them as 300 ppi
    Just use them as they are - even if they are "effectively" over 300 ppi it won't matter.
    When you make the PDF for print you can downsample the images there - reducing the size of the PDF.

  • Uniform scaling problem

    I've only recently purchased cs5 design standard for mac and just started having a problem trying to uniform scale objects in Illustrator. Basically holding down the shift key (with or without the option key) no longer scales uniformly. It's as if I'm not holding shift at all. I can't even create a square or circle anymore without using the Force or typing in the equal values in the scaling tool. indesign and photoshop are fine, so it's not the keyboard. I've tried trashing my preferences and even reinstalled Illustrator from the original disc and I'm still having the same problem. WTF?

    Rohan Caesar,
    Certain other applications may interfere. There is an updated list of known offenders in item 5 here: Other options
    You may try to close the relevant one(s) down and see whether it helps.

  • How to apply a 'calculated' radius in Unsharp Mask en mass?

    In about a week's time, when I've finished applying Curves to about 1200 B&W images, I'll be ready to apply an Unsharp Mask to each of them. Exactly how I'll do that I'm not certain yet, but I've been reading my Photoshop CS Bible (Deke McClelland) in preparation. On page 503 it states:
    If you're looking for a simple formula, I recommend 0.1 of Radius for every 15 ppi of final image resolution... If you have a calculator, just divide the intended resolution by 150 to get the ideal Radius value.
    For example, at 300 ppi use Radius = 2. Such a recommendation is just that: a recommendation (and not 'ideal' as he also states), but I've taken it as a good starting point; and while I've been adding Curves I have also been experimenting with Unsharp Mask and various Radii (but not yet saving the sharpened images).
    McClelland's statement is not clear regarding what Radius should be used if you are NOT working on the image at final resolution. I think I know what the answer is, but I want to confirm.
    Some background: I'll be printing on a Xerox iGen running a colour line screen at 175 lpi. The printer wants the images to be 300 ppi. The images at the moment range from an effective ppi of about 100 to 2000, depending on how much they have been scaled in InDesign. So I've got resolutions all over the place which at some point I will have to tidy up. Those images below about 250 ppi, I will be upsampling to 300. Those above about 450 ppi (this may change), will be downsampled to 300 when I convert to PDF.
    I have some questions:
    QUES 1
    Say I have an image at 1200 ppi, that will be downsampled to 300 ppi. Should I do the sharpening on the 1200 ppi image, or on the downsampled 300 ppi image? i.e Will it make any difference to the final printed result if sharpening is done before or after downsampling?
    QUES 2
    I think the statement:
    I recommend 0.1 of Radius for every 15 ppi of final image resolution
    should read
    I recommend 0.1 of Radius for every 15 ppi of image resolution
    Surely the Radius (assuming you accept the figures McClelland gives) depends only on the resolution of the image you are working on. i.e if you have a 1500 ppi image, use a Radius of 10 (1500/150), NOT a Radius of 2 (300/150) -- the final image resolution that is sent to the printer. Is that a correct reading of McClelland's recommendation?
    QUES 3
    My experiments indicate that for the type of images I am using, McClelland's recommendation oversharpens, at least for my liking. I will probably use half the figure he suggests: Radius = 1 for 300 ppi.
    Given that I have about 1200 images, if I was going to apply an Unsharp Mask manually this is what I would do:
    1. Put all the layers in each image into a Group.
    2. Calculate the Radius to be applied to each image from the formula: Radius = (IMAGE PPI) /300.
    3. Apply an Unsharp Mask to the Group using the calculated Radius (plus Amount = 50, Threshhold = 0)
    Of course I'm not going to do this manually -- well, I hope I'm not -- but what is the best way? Could an Action handle all of this? A Script? A combination of both? Something else entirely? Not possible in PS?
    In summary: I want to automatically apply a variable Radius that depends on the image's resolution. Possible?

    The PDF says, for one of the steps:
    Command-click the duplicate channel to make the edge mask a selection.
    When I do that, a selection outline appears, but I can't work out, or find out, what conditions are applied to make the selection. Any ideas? I may have to start a separate thread for this question. I don't like to blindly follow recipes. I like to know what's going on.
    Guy,
    I'm not sure I understand your question. With command click, the channel is the selection. White = fully selected, black = not selected. It's all the steps made to create the channel that affect the selection. To me the selection edges are visually interfering with a soft mask, I usually hide the edges.
    In post 9 steps 2-6 all contribute to the final section. Find edges identifies the edges. Median has a smoothing effect. Maximum expands the selection a little, then the gaussian blur softens it.
    This process (post 9) works for me when I sharpen images, but you may not like it. Sometimes no mask at all is a viable option - some folks like a grainy/noisy appearance in non-edge areas. Some people may even purposefully add noise to create that kind of look.
    With USM the radius thickens the light and dark areas of edges, and amount intensifies (lightening the light, darkening the dark). Threshold is just what it's  name implies, it sets a parameter for Ps to apply the sharpening or not (but it can result in a pockmarked look in smooth areas, so I like 0)
    I always look at images at actual pixels in Ps when sharpening. With sharpening there is room for opinion. Some people like thicker edges (higher radius). Some people go easy on the amount, some people are more aggressive.
    It's the scaling in ID that makes things difficult, because actual pixels won't give you a true print appearance. To correct this the image either needs to be scaled to size in PS, and placed at 100% in ID - OR left as is in ID, and the resolution changed in PS (300 x % i.e. 300 x 25% = 75 PPI)
    I like to start with radius 1 and 100 amount but these values are always subject to change. I wish it was an exact science but it's not. I like sharp images, but I don't want icicles in eyebrows either. I believe you said 175 LPI screening, so if it was me I would err on the sharp side...
    Something else I just thought of - the print size is something to think about, too. Consider the two extremes (which may or may not apply to your project) - thumbnails, and posters. If it's a thumbnail, by the time you've got the scaling right in Ps, there really isn't much pixel information left! In his instance a lot of sharpening probably wouldn't hurt, it would create contrast (which is important in very small images). The other end of the spectrum - posters. Actual pixels may be a little misleading in this case, because when the average person looks at a poster, they don't get right up on it at a normal reading distance, they view it from several feet away. For this reason sometimes poster images are only half-resolution, to keep the file size manageable, and give a more realistic view perspective.
    Hope this helps. I am not a forum expert. The others may have better advice, or may see errors in my information.

  • How can I improve quality of photos in In Design Brochure?

    Hi,
    I'm trying to create an In Design Brochure but am finding that many of the photos are pixellated despite being of high res 300 dpi.  Is it better to use photos with a higher or lower resolution that I want to be for example a sixth of A4 on a page?  I can't understand why as these photos look fine when I've used them in other non Adobe publications previously.  Your help would be most useful.  Should I post this in Photoshop forum?  Thanks you

    Did you turn on high quality preview in the context menu when clicking with the right mouse button on an image?
    Is the actual resolution still 300 ppi (not dpi)? Have a look into the link panel. If they are scaled in InDesign, the resolution will change too. (Are they scaled in InDesign?)
    300 ppi is good enough for the most puposes.

  • Automatic upsampling of low-resolution images?

    I posted about this, it might have been about a year ago now, and got no joy, so I thought I'd try again in case something new has appeared.
    When exporting to PDF, InDesign CS can downsample images. Some of my images, however, maybe 20-30 at a guess, I need to upsample. In the next month or so I hope to export to PDF, and I dread the thought of having to go through the several hundred images in my book, find those images that are under-resolution, open them in PS, and do some calculations to work out the resolution to which they should be resampled to achieve 300 dpi in the InDesign document... whoa, I'm worn out just thinking about it.
    Also on my wish list: I have a hundred or so images that cross the centre-spread boundary. Before I impose the document, I will have to go through it and Copy and Paste-in-Place each image, and then resize the boundary to the centre for both images so that when imposed, some of the image is on one page and some on the other (thanks Buko, for that hint from a few years ago). Not a great problem, but still... can this process be automated?
    Bring joy to my heart, someone please, and tell me at least one of these chores is automatable.

    ROBERT LEVINE: "Never saw that happen". You can see it happen, and I explain how to make it happen, in my downloadable zip file.
    ROB DAY: Thanks for the feedback. The sample I generated (not a typical photo I work with; I choose it because it did not have any inherent imperfections) is an accurate reflection of how I use some of my images. i.e I start with a low resolution original and it is scaled in InDesign. I do not have the option of getting a better original. Most of the images I have are 2 x 3 Box Brownies from pre 1960, obtained by me driving from Tasmania to North Queensland (3000 km) each year for four years and scanning an elderly stranger's photos on their lounge room floor. In the two-three hours I was with them I had to get their life story, look at their photos, choose the interesting ones, write down the details, and then scan them. It's a challenge to do all that, day after day, 6-8 people a week, for three months at a time. Given 10-50 photos to scan, which at high resolution take three minutes each on my scanner, sometimes they couldn't all be scanned in high resolution in the time I had available. The most likely prospects for the book I did scan at high resolution, the others got the 300 or 600 dpi treatment (this is for a 2 inch wide image, remember). Three years later, when I started putting the book together, I choose to use some of the low scan originals, greatly enlarged, because they were important photos that I didn't realize at the time of scanning.
    So, I'm stuck with some low-resolution scans and I want to make them look their best. Upscaling does that, doesn't it? And your example proves it.The choice between the middle and right photo is easy: the one on the right. i.e the upscaled unpixelated one. And I wasn't the judge: I let my partner decide (it's her niece in the photo). It's a game man who would argue with my partner.
    Further, the image on the left, your reference and which is quite acceptable, is of course taken from my 300 dpi PDF -- itself an upscaled version of a 30 dpi image. So the reference you choose again proves that upscaling works. i.e it removes pixelation and is beneficial.
    Please everyone - this is not about using a low resolution image because I'm too lazy to rescan the original. In most cases the originals are now scattered among children and grandchildren of the person I spoke with because they have passed away. Plus, if I did locate the photos, they are 3000 km away. I have some low resolution images and I want to improve them. Upscaling does that, InDesign can't, and I think it should.
    MORE ON David's remarks: Excellent tutorial, David. Pity I wasted 20 minutes to unnecessarily generate mine.
    I'd like to know the reasons why InDesign doesn't simply offer a 'Resample' option instead of only 'Downsample'. If a particular printer requires 300 dpi images for best quality, InDesign should accommodate that by allowing a user to resample every image to 300 dpi. I reckon the programers never gave thought to the idea that someone might be using low-resolution images in a flash piece of software.
    This thread has gone a bit astray. Buko has given an indirect answer (to do what I thought I would have to do) -- use Photoshop. Can I take it that no version of InDesign, or any add on, allows for automatic upsampling?
    InDesign has the ability to resample, and I bet it uses the same algorithms as Photoshop which can resample both ways. InDesign can resample downwards; it is unfortunate that it wasn't given the capability to resample upwards.

  • Working with labelled vector graphics (CS4)

    I've working with a rather large set of simple geometric vectors.
    They've all been created in illustrator, but need to be scaled in InDesign and flow with the text.
    The only method I've come up with is somewaht convoluted, so I thought I'd share and see if anyone had any suggestions on how I might improve the workflow.
    - vector graphic is pasted (not placed) into InDesign and ungrouped
    - strokes are converted (manually) to object styles (graphic styles created in illustrator are lost)
    - graphis is regrouped and roughly scaled
    - labels are added and paragraph styles applied
    - labels are grouped with graphic, cut, and "paste into" anched text box
    - re-scaling and label edits are done with select content/container/next object
    More complicated graphics will be linked and rescaled in illustrator and relabelled and placed as above.
    Is there a better/easier way to do this?
    (Maybe CS5 will have a container isolation mode...)

    I want to keep the labels out of illustrator, but there are a few graphics with more detail that percentage scaling is the way to go.
    It would be far easier if InDesign would respect (i.e. import, map) Illustrator's graphic styles.

  • Determine/Reset Scale of Linked Graphics - Maximize Image Quality

    Hi, we're currently using Illustrator CS4 for website comps to quickly mock-up pages for our clients to sign-off (we've explored using Fireworks, but there's just some major things missing that we need in regards to typography, global swatches, etc.).
    But we would like to generate some final images from these files as well for the sake of efficiency, as I believe Illustrator is 'supposed' to use the same Save for Web interface as Photoshop. It's just very efficient for us to have our slices designed, setup, optimized and named in this same master document.
    But I ran a test comparing the results when generating a final JPEG from Illustrator vs. Photoshop using the same exact settings, and on a file that was 100% of final size. But the Photoshop file was significantly sharper. So I investigated a bit more and found out that the image was scaled just a bit in Illustrator (maybe 110% or less). When I got the image to be as close to 100% as possible in Illustrator, the differences were negligible.
    - So what is the quickest/easiest method of resetting an imported image to 100% of the actual size in Illustrator?
       I look at the Transform palette (where I would see the scaling in InDesign), but it doesn't tell me anything. I had to look into the Link Information in the links palette to find the scale, but I can't change anything from there.
    - Any other tips for keeping linked files looking as good and sharp as possible all the way through the process to Saving for Web?
    - If the original image has been retouched and optimized (it's a high quality image) in Photoshop before importing into Illustrator, 'SHOULD' the results from Illustrator match Photoshop when using Save for Web and the same settings?
    THANKS! It is much more efficient for us to save our graphics from Illustrator, but we can't risk losing image quality in the process.

    jethrodesign wrote
    Yeah, I see that as long as the image has a resolution of 72dpi, it does come in at 100% of size. ..
    For what you want to achieve  you are right, sort of, but your statement is wrong.
    Images are always placed at 100% size as indicated in the info when you double click the links in the Links palette. However you have to understand what size means here. If the image has metadata containing dimensional information then that is the size in Illustrator. For example if the metadata says 5 x 5 inches it will be placed as 100% with that size according to the Illustrator's rulers regardless of what the pixel resolution of the linked image is - it can be 5 or 5000 pixels per inch. If the images don't have metadata describing the dimensions then Illustrator assumes that 72 pixels are 1 inch and will place the image with that size at 100% scale. For example if the image is with 720 x 720 pixels, Illustrator will show it as 10 x 10 inches at 100% scale.
    With work for the web you are most interested in the pixel size of the images and objects. Change the units in File > Document Setup to Pixels. But have in mind that these are 72 pixels occupying one inch on the ruler in Illustrator and not the pixel resolution of the linked images. So, the Transform palette showing the selected images or objects with pixel dimensions will matter if you save for the web or export to a raster image file format where you can specify the pixel dimensions of the image. The pixel dimensions in Illustrator will not matter at all if you print the illustrator file in which case the resolution of the linked images will be used - not the pixel space they occupy in Illustrator. But for the Web all that matters is the pixel dimensions in Illustrator. So if you want the ppi (pixels per inch) in Illustrator to match the actual ppi resolutions of the placed images (links), you have to save all images from Photoshop as 72 ppi or remove their metadata. This will ensure that no resampling occurs when you save images at 100% scale from illustrator for the web .
    In Photoshop you can use its automatd batch processing features to change quickly the ppi of multiple images.
    As for the resampling of the scaled images I believe Illustrator and Photoshop use the same algorithms
    Message was edited by: emil emil for clarity and fixing spelling

  • Imported images distorted/pixelated

    Hi,
    I am importing images (PSD and JPG) that are crystal clear in photoshop, but when I import them to InDesign, they appear and print pixelated and don't have the same clarity as in photoshop.  Can anyone give me advice?

    I've found that relying on scaling in InDesign can occasionally be wonky when you apply a great deal of scaling (as you have) to a raster image. Do the scaling in Photoshop to get it to the size/resolution you need, and place that next to the image you've scaled in ID to see if it's any better.

  • CS3(AS) Open selected image in photoshop/resize/relink

    Hello,
    I'm working on a layout with hundreds of placed images. I only need to resize a select few to so they are placed at 100%, I want to do this by running a script on just the image selected in layout, open it in photoshop, resize to match the scaling in Indesign and then relink. I've started a script that I hope is getting close. The image opens in photoshop but then wont resize(maybe I should post this in the photoshop scripting forum as well). And then I need it to relink back in InDesign.
    Here is what I have started:
    tell application "Adobe InDesign CS3"
    set theSelection to item 1 of selection
    set theClass to class of theSelection
    if theClass is in {image, PDF} then
    set theSelection to parent of theSelection
    end if
    set myHoriz to absolute horizontal scale of theSelection
    set myVert to absolute vertical scale of theSelection
    set theFilePathOfImage to file path of item link of graphic 1 of theSelection
    tell application "Adobe Photoshop CS3"
    activate
    open alias theFilePathOfImage
    set docRef to current document
    resize image docRef width (myHoriz as percent) height (myVert as percent) resample method bicubic sharper
    end tell
    set theSelection to update theSelection
    end tell

    Richard,
    What I did when faced with a similar situation was to go to Control Panel, and select Add or Remove Programs, then select Uninstall or Change for Adobe Photoshop CS2, then when prompted whether to Uninstall or Repair, choose Repair. This will fixup all the registry entries that appare to be missing from your system.
    Works for me at least.
    Steve

  • Best way to deal with screen captures?

    Hi everybody,
    I have a lot of images captured with Snagit  (computer screens). They are going to be printed in black and white.
    Usually I do like this: open png file in Photoshop, select Mode to transform in grayscale and save as PSD.
    Generally I obtain reasonably good results in the printed books (CMYK and B&W). [If I have to scale the image I usually do that in Photoshop, but if the budget is tight I do the scaling in Indesign.] I admit that I am not a very good «Photoshoper» and I notice that under Image -> Adjustements there is a command to transform images to B&W.
    I have played a bit with this two options and I have concluded that the the resulting grayscales files obtained with this different metodes are a bit different.
    Can anyone advise me about the best method to use and about the best way to do this kind of convertions in Photoshop. I am on Windows using CS 5.5
    Thank you in advance.
    Maria

    Thank you John, Peter and Scott for the reply.
    I am very happy to descover that the consensus about scaling is to do that in Indesign. That is faster and as Scott pointed it saves me the trouble of keeping to sets of files (one original size and other scaled). The method Peter uses is very smart and I will use it on my workflow (at least for the books with higher budgets bacause it implies more work).
    This forum rocks and is really a life saver for everybody...
    Maria,
    PS. Do you know what I have discovered last night. I placed a Word file in Indesign (around 120 A4 pages full of text, 60 graphics and 850 Mathtype equations) and Indesign started to work very slowly. For exemple: editing the text took a long time (1 or 2 seconds inser a character)... I work a lot with complex Math books so I am a bit used with Indesign being slow in this kind of work. But yesterday it was too much. See what I have descovered: the word file had hundreds of crossed references and half a douzen of hyperlinks. As soon as I deleted all that stuff and amade a Save As, Indesign started to behave normally.

  • Muse 2014.3 update has an over-sized user interface.

    The Adobe UI Scaling bug has reared its head again, this time with Muse (like with previous versions of PS, AI and ID before it).  See screen grab that makes my 22" HD look like an old 12" monitor (see pasted at half resolution below).
    I don't see anyone else with this issue posting, but I'm sure it's just a matter of time. Any suggestions? Do I have to go back to the Windows Environment settings again? I set it to =1 to fix one of the other applications a while back.

    Sounds like your Win machine is set to run at 125% scaling (or thereabouts), is that right? Or do you have multiple monitors with different native resolutions, and the "one resolution to rule them all" setting engaged?
    Previous versions of Muse would ignore the 125% scale factor and run at 100%.
    The new release of Muse (2014.3) also does not support running at 125%, but can run at 150% and 200% scale factors. Muse 2014.3 chooses to run at 150% in this case. For many people with vision impairment or eye strain issues 150% is a better choice than staying at 100%, but we understand it may not be best for everyone. At 150% the cursors will be oversized as you describe (using 2x cursor artwork), but everything else will be drawn crisply at 150% scale.
    In the short term, we can add support for an environment variable override similar to what InDesign and Illustrator used (see Application user interface too large | Windows). Would that address the problem for you?
    One question, would it be better for you if Muse, InDesign and Illustrator all obeyed the same environment variable override, or would it be better if Muse used a different one? Now that ID and AI have exposed a user preference setting for UI Scaling (see InDesign's below), it might be better if Muse used a different environment variable so as not to override the user preference in AI and ID.
    We will aim to add a similar Win-only user preference for the next release of Muse.
    DaveB

  • The lines are pixelated

    I have been away from Adobe CSS for a while now, so I need a little help. I'm designing a logo, but having some problems creating nice faded lines. Also i cant move the little blue circle in the horses eye (guideline?). I hope that someone can tell me how to make the line less pixelated. Thank you very much.

    I suppose you do it in Illustrator. Did you have placed the file in InDesign because you are asking here?
    Did you have turned on the Display Performance on High Quality?
    If you have done the file in Illustrator and have used effects which will make a rasterized output how are your Document Raster Effects Settings (Effects) in Illustrator, and if so, how was the graphic scaled in InDesign?

  • Overall Download Size Issues

    Hi - we have a multi-folio DPS app that has gone live. New issues are released every year. We now have two folios released, each measuring in excess of 500 GB. This is somewhat unavoidable due to the required amount of content: Over 100 pages complete with multi-state objects, hundreds of photos, and dozens of interactive .oam files. I have two questions:
    • Are there any best practices on how best to reduce overall download size of a folio without sacrificing quality?
    • Is there a way to download just the newest folio in a DPS app instead of all the past issues as well? I wonder how, for example, a magazine like Esquire handles back issues while maintaining a manageable download size for its viewers.
    Thanks in advance for any guidance and advice.

    I assume you mean 500 MB.
    The user can choose to download whatever folio he/she wants.
    For smaller file sizes stick to single orientation PDF 1024x768 articles. Compress videos as much as possible and if you viewing in line scale them to the proper dimensions instead of scaling in InDesign. You might also consider streaming the video.

  • Scaling images and text in indesign CC

    Indesign CC (MAC 10.8.4)
    Hi, I'm a long time user of indesign and I'm having a real problems with scaling text and image boxs. Can't believe I'm asking having to ask this question, it's such a basic function!!
    If I use cmd or cmd+shift none of the content scales.
    Is there a new check box or a preference I need to change?
    Thanks in advance!

    There's no change in the way scaling works in InDesign CC. Cmd+Shift-scaling adjusts the content with the frame.
    Things to try out: (1) Restoring your preferences. (2) Looking for applications that conflict with the shortcuts. (For example, I found the password protector 1Password conflicts with InDesign.)

Maybe you are looking for

  • A new problem , the dvd driver icon disappeared in the computer

    i have a thinkpad T410, 64bit family premium .  when i double click computer. i can't find the dvd driver icon. and this driver doesn't work as well. what is wrong whith that ?

  • Help! hyperlink to email

    Hi, I'm trying to write a resume on Appleworks 6. I've been really frustrated with it, I cannot get my contact info right because I can't make my email address into an email hyperlink. Is this possible with AW? All I see are options for internet or d

  • Linking Dreamweaver to Access

    I am unsure what way I should go about linking a website I am creating in Dreamweaver to a simple Access Database. All its purpose is, is to allow people to enter their name and email address, before clicking submit. This will then store on a table,

  • 1131 LAP in autonomous mode

    I was setting up the APs for a new users lab when we discovered they had puchased LAPs instead of APs. I installed the current version of the IOS following the procedures outlined in "Converting a Lightweight Access Point Back to Autonomous Mode" on

  • How to change the Format Colour?

    Hi, I found that something are really useful~in the Inspector~Link tab~Format tab,it can change the colours of the instruction like NEXT,PREVIOUS... But this useful skil only able to apply on some pages like the Blog~Entries;but it seems doesn't work