SCCM creating duplicate computer Objects

Hi
We have just upgraded from an SCCM 2007 to SCCM 2012. In the old system I had it set up that other members of my team could all add a machine to SCCM adding the MAC address information and then add the machine into AD. once in AD they could assign it
to security groups for example a windows 7 group. every 10 minutes SCCM would scan AD see the machine name and update the security group information on the computer object that was manually created earlier. based on this if SCCM could see it
in the Windows 7 group it would move the machine to the Windows 7 collection and then I had an advertisement that would deploy Windows 7.
On the new system however I add the machine into SCCM with the MAC then add it to AD but I end up with 2 objects one that I added with the MAC but doesn't get updated with the security group information so doesn't get added to the collection and then another
one created from scanning AD which has the security information but no MAC so wont build.
how can I get it to just update the one object?
thanks

I create the object in AD so that I can assign a computer security groups like Windows 7 or install office and based on that SCCM moves the machine into various collections. when I then build a machine it will build with the various option set for example
it will build a machine with Windows 7. I have to also import it into SCCM so I can assign it a MAC address so that when I PXE boot a machine it recognises it.
I used to be able to under sccm 2007 import it manually into SCCM with the MAC so it would PXE boot and also create an AD computer account with the security groups and in the correct OU so that when it built it would be joined to the domain
with the correct GP applied. 2007 used to merge the 2 objects or at least detect the machine name already existed and applied the information to the existing objects.
its neater for me to do it this way than have everyone doing direct relationships for all machines on collections

Similar Messages

Duplicate Computer objects in SCCM

Hi,
I am noticing that now and then I am seeing duplicate computer objects in SCCM 2012. We are using AD discovery and in AD there arent duplicates. Do you know what the cause of having duplicate computers in SCCM is and how to resolve this issue?
Thank you.

Hi,
Please refer to the link below:
ConfigMgr SCCM How to Resolve Duplicate or Conflict Record Issue
http://anoopcnair.com/2011/04/08/configmgr-sccm-duplicate-record-issue/
Note: Microsoft provides third-party contact information to help you find technical support. This contact information may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this third-party contact information.
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

AD System Group Discovery not updating System OU Name on computer object when computer moves OU

2 related questions.
1. We have noticed that computer objects (active clients) in ConfigMgr are not getting their System OU Name discovery data updated when a computer account is moved from one OU to another, and AD System Group Discovery runs. Since we are basing some of our Software Updates collections on AD OU name, these systems are not falling into their required collections.
2. On a few occasions we are also seeing duplicate computer objects being created. One new record from AD System Discovery, which contains the correct 'new' System OU Name, and one 'old' computer object from before the computer account was moved to a different OU in AD. The heartbeat discovery of this second object is still updating e.g. showing new heartbeats, but the computer object still shows the old System OU Name from before the computer account was moved in AD. If we delete both objects and run a Discovery Data Collection Cycle from the client, and AD System Group Discovery, then we get one new record with the correct 'new' set of System OU names.
This duplicates issue is happening in both our Central Primary Site and our other child Primary site. Both sites are set to create new client records for duplicate hardware IDs, and there is a possibility we're seeing the duplicate records on machines that have been re-imaged and redeployed at some point.
It's my understanding that it is AD System Group Discovery that updates the System OU Name property on client objects. We have this set to run every 4 hours. I'm not seeing any errors in the adsysgrp.log. Any idea why discovery is not updating the System OU Name information when a computer account moves OU? As far as I understand it, nothing additional is required to happen from the client end for this property to get updated.

The only thing I can think of would be ad sys group discovery not running at the site where the client is assigned to?
"Everyone is an expert at something" Kim Oppalfens Configmgr expert for lack of any other expertise. http://www.scug.be/blogs/sccm
HI Everyone..
ANy reply or correct answer to this question???
Same problem even i have. Duplicate machine names created when machine moved to different sites.
And also, AD sys group discovery running on all the sites (i have 4 sites).
System Security analyst at CapG

AMT Computer Object Creation in Out of Band Management

Just configured our Out of Band Management / AMT settings and we're getting all our AMT systems provisioned successfully. I've noticed that now, in SCCM 2012, the AMT object that gets created are Computer objects in AD. Their objectCategory is
CN=Computer,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=mydomain,DC=com
Back in the SCCM 2007 days, They were Person objects in AD. We still have some in AD.
CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=mydomain,DC=com
Is this the default setting or do I have the option to change it?
Orange County District Attorney

Since no one has answer this post, I recommend opening a support case with CSS as they can work with you to solve this problem.
Garth Jones | My blogs: Enhansoft and
Old Blog site | Twitter:
@GarthMJ

Deleted computer object from SCCM console, so why is it still appearing in SSRS reports?

We recently divested about 400 computers from our network. I got a list of these computers and deleted them from both Active Directory and in the SCCM Console. I know the deletes were successful because when I search via device name in the SCCM console
they no longer show up. Yet when I run one of our inventory reports in SSRS I still see several of the devices that I deleted listed there. I thought SSRS represented a" live view" of the SCCM database. If that's true then how can a computer object
that I deleted in the console still be present in the database? Is there something I'm missing?

Okay you are saying to select from v_R_System_Valid instead of v_R_System in my query and that will automatically filter out items I removed in the console? Okay that sounds like what I want, the only problem is my query is selecting form v_GS_COMPUTER_SYSTEM.
Can I just add "_Valid" to the end of that and achieve the same result?
Update - Yeah no I tried that and it did not work. Clearly I have a very limited understanding of the SQL views. Interestingly enough Torsten I see you posted a linbk on your blog to a new Microsoft article that documents the SQL views in SCCM 2012. Looking
at it now...

SCCM 2012 OSD: Import computer object fails

Hi,
Please see this post:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/6dbd2b38-4dbb-4de3-bb25-e3a30813f108/importing-computer-fails-unable-to-save-changes?forum=configmanagerosd
We have exactly the same issue: we cannot import a computer object due to the error "Unable to save changes", a query which searches for mac-addresses doesn't reveal the pc-name (which is logic because the sccm 2012 should run an inventory first
but the pc is not loaded).
Please advise.
J.
Jan Hoedt

Any chance that the object (where you are trying to add a MAC address) was added to the database by AD group discovery? So the name is already in the database? If so: that's expected.
If not: CU1 for R2 might fix the problem (it is listed as being fixed)
Torsten Meringer | http://www.mssccmfaq.de

SCCM 2012 R2 task sequence: Move a computer object to different OU

Hi,
We migrate from Windows XP to 7.
During task sequence, we need to be sure the object is moved from one OU to another (XP to Vista OU/policies).
What is the best way to do this?
Could be wrong, but it seems that a default task sequence does not move the object although there is a step which explicitely says to put the computer object in a certain OU ("apply network settings").
Please advise.
J.
Jan Hoedt

Hi you can check this article:
http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/maikkoster/archive/2010/04/08/moving-computers-in-active-directory-during-mdt-deployments-step-by-step.aspx
Hope this helps.
Note: This posting is provided 'AS IS' with no warranties or guarantees, and confers no rights. Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable. This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and
recognises useful contributions.

Managing multiple "old" AD computer objects

So we have implemented a naming convention where the techs just select a location and department during the imaging process for a machine that is about to be deployed; during that process and the computers are automagically named something like "NYC-FIN-1234567"...
with 1234567 being the dell asset tag.... pretty nifty Johan(!)
However... the problem is that once that machine gets re-imaged at the same location and deployed to another team like the marketing folks (ie."MKT")... it gets the name NYC-MKT-1234567...
the problem I am seeing is now we have multiple objects in AD with the same asset tag which is causing nightmares for licensing management... NYC-FIN-1234567 & NYC-MKT-1234567 respectively.
I am working on a PowerShell script that will trim the names down to their respective tags and then compare the list for duplicates - then check and compare the duplicates properties like "created date" and make a determination and delete
the older object...
this checking for duplicates is proving to be a little more difficult and haven't even gotten to the evaluate section yet... I am still working on my proficiency when it comes to more complex arrays.
am i going about this the right way or does anyone else have another approach to this conundrum?
scripting games '14 anyone :p

all good info!
Since our AD has less than 3000 workstation objects the 'scaling' is manageable... but could make it a little faster, but alas here is what i have with a couple of tweaks
i am skimming all computer objects in our 'workstation' OU... and dropping the first two prefixes, and then checking for machines that match... we were originally using "created date" but since we have workstations that have been imaged to say
a FIN dept and then to a MKT dept and then re-re-imaged back to FIN... the created date doesn't change so i switched to Modified date, and keep the newest one...
but also as another 'layer' of protection i test-path of the workstation (we run this middle of the day) before disabling it and moving it to a "temp" ou where we can let them sit for a couple weeks in case we had a false positive (thus the ping)
we can quickly restore that object... i also can just comment out the actual "move and disable command" so it generates me a nice list of machines that would have been deleted so i can do a 'sanity check' before deleting a bunch of vip's machiens
from AD :)
#Declare Domain and OU to be Scrubbed - and $dupou is the ou we can let them 'chillout' before deleting on the next run
$domain = "domain.com"
$OU = "OU=Workstations,DC=domain,DC=com"
$CleanupList = "c:\disabled.txt"
$dupOU = "OU=Duplicates,OU=INACTIVE,DC=domain,DC=com"
if (test-path $CleanupList) {Remove-Item $CleanupList}
$delOK = "c:\DelOk.txt"
if (test-path $delOK) {Remove-Item $delOK}
#this is the TEMPORARY throttle cap... so it will stop after it finds the amount defined by $cap (so we can phase it in)
$cap = 10000
$Global:i = 0
$sdate = (Get-Date)
Write-Output "AD Duplicate 'Scrubber' Script started on: "$sdate >> $CleanupList
Write-output "These Machines were disabled and moved to the Inactive\Duplicates OU in our domain" >> $CleanupList
Write-Output "--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------">> $CleanupList
$comps = (Get-ADComputer -filter * -Server $domain -SearchBase $OU).name
ForEach ($comp in $comps) {
if ($global:i -lt $cap) {
#trim length to just asset tags (last 7 digits)
$Length = $comp.Length
$var = $Length - 7
$tag = $comp.Substring($var,7)
Write-host -ForegroundColor yellow "Testing asset tag: $tag"
$x =(Get-ADComputer -Filter "name -like '*$tag'" -Properties DistinguishedName, Modified -Server $domain -SearchBase $OU |Sort-Object -Property Modified)
if ($x.count -gt 1) {
$y = ($x.count) -1
while ($y -ge 1 ) {
$z = $y - 1
$x.name[$z] >> $CleanupList
#added a ping feature to as another level of "protection"
if (Test-Connection $x.name[$z] -Count 2 -Quiet){
Write-Output $x.name[$z]" is Online... Skipping"
$x.name[$z] >> c:\WTF.txt
}Else {
#this line below this one is the one that moves and disables... comment out if testing with a # sign or remove when testing compelete
#Get-ADComputer $x.name[$z] | Move-ADObject -TargetPath $dupOU -PassThru | Disable-ADAccount
Write-Output $x.name[$z]" is Offline... should delete"
$global:i++
$x.name[$z] >> $delOK
write-host -ForegroundColor Cyan $x.name[$z]" Moved and Disabled - $global:i"
$y--
Write-host "------------"
Write-host -foregroundcolor cyan "$i Computer objects were Disabled and Moved to $dupOU :)"
#message in the body
$msg ="Please review the attached list to see the Duplicate machines that were moved and disabled via this script"
#Recipients
$mailTo = "shad acker <[email protected]>"
Send-MailMessage -SmtpServer smtp.domain.com -Attachments $delOK -Body $msg -to $mailTo -From "DuplicateFinder<[email protected]>" -Subject "Computer Duplicates Disabled" -Cc "who ever <[email protected]>"
not the prettiest or most efficinent but it seems to be working :)

Set Computer Variables on "unknown" computer object

Hi all,
we are using unknown Computer support for OSD. When the OSD process started, there is a new record created called "unknown" for every machine.
Our OSD Process consists of a workflow running in the background on System Center Orchestrator, collecting a few more values from other systems like ITSM. To interface with the currently running OSD of a Machine, we write down Computer Variables on the device
object (visible in SCCM Console then) which can be used in the task sequence.
Well, this is how it worked for us with "known" computer but with "unknown" computer it seems that we can't set variables on the "unknown" device object in that state.
Is this per design ? Can't I set any variable on the object self during "unknown" phase?
After OSD is done, the computer object is updated to reflect its name and we now can set variables, but indeed to late.
Could you confirm that this is per design ? Any workaround ?
Thanks

This is not documented as far as I know, but I guess that it is by design since those 'unknown' objects are transient. I also think that the client (once in the 'unknown state' does not download policies again so that those variable additions will never
make it to the client).
Workaround? Most likely yes, but this requires deep knowledge of what you want to achieve exactly.
Torsten Meringer | http://www.mssccmfaq.de

ITunes Consolidation: Will it create duplicates of media files if they already exist in the new itunes destination folder but arent being referenced by the itunes library?

I have a macbook pro from fall 2010. I have been using my external HD as my primary itunes folder for the past 7 yrs ( i.e it is organized by itunes default categorization, etc). However, there is some overlap between my external HD itunes folder and my comps original itunes folder (probably 20-30% of my current library's media files were already duplicated there from when i first bought the HD and transferred files to the external, however they are mostly referenced from the external now). Also there are files in the comp's itunes folder that are not on my external (probably due to organizational mishaps and podcast downloads when not connected to the external, etc). I do not know how many files this is the case for.
Recently, i decided that i wanted to consolidate all of my itunes music into one concise folder on my macbook's HD to avoid these issues going forward. I also just bought a new external which i will use to back up my comp's itunes folder once i consolidate everything to the comp. But i plan on using the itunes folder on the comp going forward or at least using the consolidate fcn to avoid these issues.
Here is my dilemma. Prior to learning of the consolidate feature today, I changed the default itunes folder in settings to the original itunes folder on the macbook and then manually dragged all of the media files from my external itunes folder to the macbook's itunes folder. There were a ton of duplicates or overlapping folders with similar artist names, so i opted to have them merge all folders where possible. After doing this, i realized the itunes library still references these files that i dragged and dropped from the external since that is where my default itunes folder used to be. At that point i then read and learned of the consolidate itunes feature which seems like the best way to do this. But i am afraid that if i consolidate my library to my macbook's itunes folder now, will it create duplicates of the 4000 + media files i just dragged to the macbook's itunes folder which are already in the itunes library but being referenced from the old external??
Question: Is there a way that i can make these files i just dragged to the macbook's itunes folder become the ones referenced by the itunes library through the consolidate feature without creating duplicates of these 4000+ files? I want to avoid having three copies of these files (two duplicates in the itunes and the originals on the external). Furthermore, is there a best way to find out which files in the macbook's itunes folder are not being included in the library after consolidating everything to the computer's HD? Then after that, what is the best way to start backing this all up to my new external, so that this overlapping issue doesnt happen again? Im assuming i just need to make sure to consolidate first when changing itunes folders going forward. Thank you. I know that was a lot to read but hopefully someone can help with this issue.

In general:
- The best way to check if files are in a library is to drag the whole media folder to the library. If something was missed it will be added. If it is in the library is won't be added a second time.
- If you have a second copy of a file and iTunes does not currently list that specific file in its database then even if it is identical to one already in the database it will add it a second time. So if you have file xyz on the internal drive and the external drive and add them to iTunes you will end up with two entries for the same thing in iTunes because you really do have to copies of the files. While this can happen with two copies on a single drive, it will almost definitely be the case when you have a copy of a file on two drives because iTunes really sees them as two different things.
-Unless you know how iTunes works, avoid moving files yourself. Let the consolidate feature do all the file moving. Manually moving files can really mess up iTunes unless you know what you are doing and have iTunes set to not try to do it itself.
- There's no clean and easy way to delete duplicates. The best thing is to change practice so you don't create them. Here are references:
How to find and remove duplicate items in your iTunes library - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2905
http://dougscripts.com/itunes/itinfo/dupin.php (commercial)
Posts by turingtest2 about different types of duplicates and techniques- https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3555601 and https://discussions.apple.com/message/16042406 (Note: The DeDuper script is for Windows)
http://www.hardcoded.net/dupeguru_me/

Error in creating Duplicate Database in same server..

Hi,
I am getting following error when creating duplicate database
DB Version=10.2.0.4
$ rman target sys/sys@test nocatalog auxiliary /
Recovery Manager: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Sep 28 15:13:32 2009
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
connected to target database: TEST (DBID=1702666620, not open)
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
connected to auxiliary database: CLNTEST (not mounted)
RMAN> DUPLICATE TARGET DATABASE TO "CLNTEST";
Starting Duplicate Db at 28-SEP-09
allocated channel: ORA_AUX_DISK_1
channel ORA_AUX_DISK_1: sid=156 devtype=DISK
contents of Memory Script:
set until scn 597629461;
set newname for datafile 1 to
"/u01/data_new/clonetest/system01.dbf";
set newname for datafile 2 to
"/u01/data_new/clonetest/undotbs01.dbf";
set newname for datafile 3 to
"/u01/data_new/clonetest/sysaux01.dbf";
set newname for datafile 4 to
"/u01/data_new/clonetest/users01.dbf";
set newname for datafile 5 to
"/u01/data_new/clonetest/example01.dbf";
set newname for datafile 6 to
"/u01/data_new/clonetest/undotbs02.dbf";
set newname for datafile 7 to
"/u01/data_new/clonetest/alweb1.dbf";
set newname for datafile 8 to
"/u01/data_new/clonetest/indx1.dbf";
restore
check readonly
clone database
executing Memory Script
executing command: SET until clause
executing command: SET NEWNAME
executing command: SET NEWNAME
executing command: SET NEWNAME
executing command: SET NEWNAME
executing command: SET NEWNAME
executing command: SET NEWNAME
executing command: SET NEWNAME
executing command: SET NEWNAME
Starting restore at 28-SEP-09
using channel ORA_AUX_DISK_1
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of Duplicate Db command at 09/28/2009 15:13:40
RMAN-03015: error occurred in stored script Memory Script
RMAN-06026: some targets not found - aborting restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 8 found to restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 7 found to restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 6 found to restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 5 found to restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 4 found to restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 3 found to restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 2 found to restore
RMAN-06023: no backup or copy of datafile 1 found to restore
RMAN> crosscheck backupset of datafile 1;
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: sid=154 devtype=DISK
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u01/rmanbkp/db_prd0akqcnoh_1_1 recid=10 stamp=698769169
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u02/data/flash_recovery_area/BINGO/backupset/2009_09_28/o1_mf_nnndf_TAG20090928T151044_5d114x0h_.bkp recid=17 stamp=698771444
Crosschecked 2 objects
RMAN> crosscheck backupset of datafile 2;
using channel ORA_DISK_1
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u01/rmanbkp/db_prd0akqcnoh_1_1 recid=10 stamp=698769169
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u02/data/flash_recovery_area/BINGO/backupset/2009_09_28/o1_mf_nnndf_TAG20090928T151044_5d114x0h_.bkp recid=17 stamp=698771444
Crosschecked 2 objects
RMAN> crosscheck backupset of datafile 3;
using channel ORA_DISK_1
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u01/rmanbkp/db_prd0akqcnoh_1_1 recid=10 stamp=698769169
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u02/data/flash_recovery_area/BINGO/backupset/2009_09_28/o1_mf_nnndf_TAG20090928T151044_5d114x0h_.bkp recid=17 stamp=698771444
Crosschecked 2 objects
RMAN> crosscheck backupset of datafile 4;
using channel ORA_DISK_1
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u01/rmanbkp/db_prd0akqcnoh_1_1 recid=10 stamp=698769169
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u02/data/flash_recovery_area/BINGO/backupset/2009_09_28/o1_mf_nnndf_TAG20090928T151044_5d114x0h_.bkp recid=17 stamp=698771444
Crosschecked 2 objects
RMAN> crosscheck backupset of datafile 5;
using channel ORA_DISK_1
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u01/rmanbkp/db_prd0akqcnoh_1_1 recid=10 stamp=698769169
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u02/data/flash_recovery_area/BINGO/backupset/2009_09_28/o1_mf_nnndf_TAG20090928T151044_5d114x0h_.bkp recid=17 stamp=698771444
Crosschecked 2 objects
RMAN> crosscheck backupset of datafile 6;
using channel ORA_DISK_1
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u01/rmanbkp/db_prd0akqcnoh_1_1 recid=10 stamp=698769169
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u02/data/flash_recovery_area/BINGO/backupset/2009_09_28/o1_mf_nnndf_TAG20090928T151044_5d114x0h_.bkp recid=17 stamp=698771444
Crosschecked 2 objects
RMAN> crosscheck backupset of datafile 7;
using channel ORA_DISK_1
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u01/rmanbkp/db_prd0akqcnoh_1_1 recid=10 stamp=698769169
crosschecked backup piece: found to be 'AVAILABLE'
backup piece handle=/u02/data/flash_recovery_area/BINGO/backupset/2009_09_28/o1_mf_nnndf_TAG20090928T151044_5d114x0h_.bkp recid=17 stamp=698771444
Crosschecked 2 objects
Thanks,

Hi,
RMAN> show all;
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
RMAN configuration parameters are:
CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO REDUNDANCY 1; # default
CONFIGURE BACKUP OPTIMIZATION OFF; # default
CONFIGURE DEFAULT DEVICE TYPE TO DISK; # default
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP OFF; # default
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO '%F'; # default
CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE DISK PARALLELISM 1 BACKUP TYPE TO BACKUPSET; # default
CONFIGURE DATAFILE BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE MAXSETSIZE TO UNLIMITED; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION FOR DATABASE OFF; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM 'AES128'; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY TO NONE; # default
CONFIGURE SNAPSHOT CONTROLFILE NAME TO '/oracle/ora10g/product/10.2.0/db_1/dbs/snapcf_TEST.f'; # default
Thanks,

Duplicate Resource Objects are displayed while provisioning the resource

Duplicate Resource Objects are displayed while provisioning the resource to organization after creating a new workflow through export and import process.
A workfolw already exists in the environment and I am trying to replicate the work flow with a different name . So i import all the components related to provisioning workflow rename the names of the components and make the necessary changes and import it back. after this I am getting Duplicate Resource Objects being displayed while provisioning the resource to organization .plz help.its urgent

I have tried this process thrice not able to solve this problem ......unchecking allow multiple ..i don t think matters as this is provisioning to org ...n what i am telling is the list from which u select the resources to be provisioned --that list shows duplicate resource object names at a time..Each time I import an xml the number of same resource object names being displayed in the list increases ...So If I have imported three workflows then (say Resorce Object AD) appears thrice in the list. I have not given the resource objects same name in all the workflows for this to happen
Sahana

CUSTOMER_REL - Business partner not created; duplicate check on address

Hello Colleagues
I have a problem during CUSTOMER_REL replication from ERP to CRM.
In r3am1 object looks fine but in some BDoc following error appears:
Assignment person - address exists already
Message no. AM038
and the Business Partner for Contact Person is not created.
We are on:
SAP_ABA     701     0005     SAPKA70105     Cross-Application Component
SAP_BASIS     701     0005     SAPKB70105     SAP Basis Component
PI_BASIS     701     0005     SAPK-70105INPIBASIS     Basis Plug-In
ST-PI     2008_1_700     0001     SAPKITLRD1          SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
SAP_BS_FND701     0005     SAPK-70105INSAPBSFND     SAP Business Suite Foundation
SAP_BW     701     0005     SAPKW70105     SAP Business Warehouse
SAP_AP     700     0018     SAPKNA7018     SAP Application Platform
WEBCUIF     00     0005     SAPK-70005INWEBCUIF     SAP WEBCUIF 700
BBPCRM     700     0005     SAPKU70005     BBPCRM
BP-CRM70     700V1     0000               SAP Best Practices for CRM 7.0
BP-INSTASS     600V7     0000               SAP Best Practices Solution Builder
ST-A/PI     01L_CRM5700000               Application Servicetools for CRM 500 51
And have already applied
1394635
1396910
1397895
1410788
1438046
But it is seems problem lies on SAP_ABA as I have found note
1092089 - Business partner not created; duplicate check on address
which is valid for different BP role and
SAP_ABA 700
SAP_ABA 710 but not for our 701
Have you ever seen similar issue?
Thanks in advance
Michal

Hi Naresh,
Thanks for reply. Correction instructions from this note refer to METHOD MODIFY_CONP_ADDRES which doesn't exist in crm7.0.
I can see in CRM that contact person is replicated and is present in BUT000 but table BUT052 is empty for this contact.
What is more we have implemented in our CRM note 564538 To change Contact Persons grouping replicated from ECC to CRM.
But also have: Note 757955 - Incompatible change concerning CRMC_BUT_CALL_FU.
We checked as well
Note 609766 - Correction of BP GUIDS in CRMM_BUT_CUSTNO, BUT000, CRMKUNNR
Note 836353 and run reports to find inconsistencies in tables BUT052, BUT051, ADCP and ADRVP. However no inconsistencies were found.
Thanks in advance if you have any other idea.
Cheers,
Michal

How do I prevent Lightroom from creating duplicates if the edit in photoshop is not saved?

Hello!
How do I prevent Lightroom from creating duplicates if the edit in photoshop is not saved?
So... Quite often I choose to 'Edit in photoshop' from Lightroom but then end up not saving the result. (for example, because I just wanted to experiment with the photo, or I'm not satisfied with the results)
However, Lightroom always creates a copy of the original photo, which stays in the catalog even if the photoshop changes aren't saved.
Is there a way to stop this, and only add a photo if it has been edited in PS?
Using LR5 with PS CS6 on a Mac 10.9
THANK YOU!

Select 'Open the Image in PS as a Smart Object'. The image will be rendered by ACR in memory without being written to disc until you save it from within PS.

Health rollup to computer object from Microsoft.Windows.ApplicationComponent

Hi All.
Trying to author a Management Pack in Authoring Console 2007 R2. And can't get rollup to work as I want.
Here's the long story.
I've created:
A discovery MP witch holds:
- an abstract class inherited from Microsoft.Windows.Computer, named: "AppX.Cmp.Role"
- a (seed?) class inherited from the above, named: "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server"
- a class inherited from "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server" named "App.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator"
- a class inherited from "Microsoft.Windows.ApplicationComponent" named: "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator.Loginstance"
- a class of type "Microsoft.SystemCenter.InstanceGroup" named: "AppX.Group"
- a relationship (system.hosting) where source class is "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator" and target class is "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator.Loginstance"
- a registrydiscovery to discover "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server" targeted at "Windows.Operating.System"
- a scriptdiscovery to discover "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator" targeted at "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server"
- a scriptdiscovery to discover "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator.Loginstance" targeted at "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator"
- a groupdiscovery ("Microsoft.SystemCenter.GroupPopulator") target: "AppX.Group" (Microsoft.Windows.Computer)
- a dependencymonitor targeted at "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator" and monitor dependency set to "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator.Loginstance", HealthRollup set to "worst state".
A monitoring MP (depending on the discovery MP) witch holds:
- a processmonitor targeted to "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator" and "replicator.exe"
- a logfilemonitor targeted to "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator.Loginstance"
- a stateview targeted to "AppX.Group"
When I kill the "replicator.exe" process the object goes to unhealthy all the way up to "Windows.Computer". But when the logfilemonitor triggers and turns into "unhealthy state" the object in the above view turns RED but not the
"Windows.Computer" object (looking at the default view "Windows Computers").
Is it possible to get the "Windows.Computer" object to reflect the "AppX.Cmp.Role.Server.Replicator.Loginstance" state?
How?

Sorry about that - its been a long weekend.
I was quoting from the following;
"Use the Microsoft.Windows.LocalApplication as
a base class when your class type represents a local application that shares the resources of the hosting Windows computer with other applications. Unlike theMicrosoft.Windows.ComputerRole class,
the Microsoft.Windows.LocalApplication class
type does not automatically roll its health up to the hosting computer."
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee533867.aspx
Would you be able to upload the results if you run the Visio MP diagram generator and possibly the health explorer views and this will help me see how it hangs togther?

SCCM creating duplicate computer Objects

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for