Scenarios for implementing email

Hello,
Can anybody suggest some common scenarios where email notifications can be implemented in 4.6C?
Regards,
Sujith

Hi,
1. When you use workflow for approvals. For example if invoice is more than $ 1000 then you would need approval from the manager. Hence, you would send an email for approval if the invoice amount exceeds $ 1000.
2. In EDI processes. You would send an email to responsible persons when a document fails.
3. When you use workflow for notifications. To inform the responsible persons that a document has been created. etc
4. Handling of exception situations.
Regards,
Srilatha.

Similar Messages

Scenarios for implementing email notification

Hello,
Can anybody suggest some common scenarios where email notifications can be implemented in 4.6C?
Regards,
Sujith

Hi,
you can look into the following threads on SDN,
Two tasks under one change request
email
Re: Email

Different scenarios for implementing screen exits

Hi all,
Is there different scenarios for implementing screen exits for different applications such as MM,SD....etc.

Hi all,
Is there different scenarios for implementing screen exits for different applications such as MM,SD....etc.

Scenarios for implementing workflow

Hello,
Can anybody suggest some scenarios where I can implement SAP work flow?
Some links will be very useful.
Regards,
Sujith

Hello,
Implementing the model for workflow execution
This section discusses the modeling option we implemented with the required task iteration functions for our client. The process model we created to represent the end-to-end process, and its mapping to the client's business scenarios, are shown. A snapshot of the process model, with its process modules and activities that each of the process modules orchestrate, are also discussed.
Rationale for the choice
To implement task rework we selected Option 2, the process-subprocess approach (stop, rewind, and start). This approach allows for better process simulation that helps optimize the business process. It also helps keep the model unchanged, even after the process improvements result in less rework. Although, it is recommended that the model is cleaned up to remove the unwanted rework steps.
Rework needs will likely be reduced because rework is not typically driven by process or business conditions. It is most often caused by operational constraints and lack of full understanding of the process. The rework occurrences would diminish as users gain better understanding by using a workflow solution and by applying monitoring results to improve the business process.
The business process model developed using WBI Modeler consists of process modules identified in the process scope. The end-to-end process is created by using the process modules and business rules to help choreograph these modules in the correct sequence.
The process model approach supports execution of business process for a "happy path." The process modules are used to execute the end-to-end process for happy path and the task rework requirement. The approach also supports reusability. The model information includes organization data, process data elements, and metrics data (KPIs).
End-to-end business process model
The contract management process involves various business activities that result in creation of proposals and contracts. The activities are logically grouped into process modules, which in turn make up the end-to-end process model. A business event in the CRM system triggers the launching of the process and executes the modules and activities based on business rules. The process execution creates and assigns tasks to sales support team members, who will work and complete the tasks. The process modules are mapped to the business scenarios as shown here.
Scenario 1: Execute Service Request 1 - Customer Research
Scenario 2: Execute Service Request 2 - Solution Configuration
Scenario 3: Execute Service Request 3 - Solution Pricing
Scenario 4: Execute Service Request 4 - Perform Customer Credit Check
Scenario 5: Execute Service Request 5 - Prepare Proposal and Contract

Implement the following scenario for credit memo

Dear experts!
Thank you for your attention!
how to implement the following scenario for credit memo??????
1.Credit memo requests are usually blocked for billing (that is, credit) upon creation until the
employee responsible releases this block.
2.Within our company, we want make the definition of the point at which the check is carried out and
the employee responsible dependent upon the value of the credit memo request.
3.If the value of the credit memo request is below a certain minimum limit, then it can be released
automatically by the system.
4.The workflow within the framework of credit memo processing now guarantees that the employee
responsible is automatically determined and informed when a credit memo request is created,
depending on the value involved.
waiting for your help!!!!!
Best regard!
Tangdark

Hi,
Hope so you know all the setting regarding credit memo customizing.
Otherwise use the standard one.
Regarding authorization go to PFCG and create a new role.
In that you can maintain the authorization regarding the minimum credit limit.
Please check out this setting.
And update me also if I was wrong.
Regards
Raj.

What is the best way to follow the scenario for Out look integration with share point using SAP Gateway?

1)what is the best way to follow the scenario for Out look integration with share point using SAP Gateway?
2)workflow concepts for Purchase order?
3)Email triggering from out look for an approval process of PO? how these scenario can be best implemented with updated functions in Duet Enterprise.

Hi,
I do not have much idea on gateway integration with outlook but found out this document GWPAM Workflow Template which can be helpful for you to start with.
also you may want to post your question in SAP Microsoft Interoperability forum
Regards,
Chandra

How to use pre-defined scenarios for RosettaNet with XI 3.0

Hi all.
   I am working in Comgroup Shanghai co. ltd. which is partner of SAP China.
   We have a potential customer who use RosettaNet as their Supply Chain EDI system.
   I would like to make a demo for demostrate the pre-defined scenarios for RosettaNet RNIF 2.0 packages.
   Where can I find such guideline ? I have checked the article: implementing RosettaNet with XI 3.0, but it cannot help me.
   Another question is how I can develop my own scenarios for the RNIF standards which are not included in XI RosettaNet business package ?

Hi Andy,
See the instructions below after you installed the RosettaNet STK.
Below given is the sample config for PIP3B2 Scenario. Part I is using STK and Part II is using 2 XI systems.
<b>Part I. Test Using STK</b>
In your XI ID:
1) Define both the parties 1) Shipper(Your Partner) 2) Receiver(Your company) with identifiers like DUNS Number.
2) In ID goto>Tools>Transfer Integration Scenarios from IR-->select the scenario "PIP3B2_Receiver" from the drop down list.
3) Follow the 4 steps in the config wizard.
4) While creating your CC, create it from the channel template delivered with the RosettaNet BP.
   4.1) Specify the URL for STK which should be in the following format
http://<STK Server>:<port>/rosettanet/servlet/listenerServlet?userId=<Party Name>
   4.2)In the location fields, enter your location and your partner location.
In your STK
1) Start the RosettaNet STK.
2) enter the UserID<Partner Name in XI>
3) Select the Test Scenario, 3B2V01.01-AdvanceShipmentNotification-0001-Scenario-Shipper
4) Enter Global Business ID(DUNS Number) and Location ID for both the partners. These fields should be same as in your R/3 Party configuration.
5) Enter the URL as follows:
http://<XI Server:<J2EE_Port>/MessagingSystem/receive/RNIFAdapter/RNIF
If everything is configured correctly as mentioned, you should be able to test your single-action scenario.
<b>Part II Test using another XI System</b>
For these follow the steps above for XI Config.
Configure one XI System as PIP3B2 Shipper using the Scenario "PIP3B2_Shipper" and config wizard as mentioned above.
Configure the other XI as PIP3B2 Receiver using the scenario "PIP3B2_Receiver" and config wizard.
In the Url field, specify the URL as follows:
http://<XI host>:<J2EE_Port>/MessagingSystem/receive/RNIFAdapter/RNIF
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sam Raju

Scenarios for PI 7.1

Hi,
I am looking for different scenarios for PI 7.1, I am specifically looking for these scenarios.
1. iDoc to File
2. File to iDoc
3. iDoc to Webservice
4. Webservice to iDoc
5. Proxy to Webservice
6. Webservice to Proxy
Please do not send links for PI 7.0, I am specifically looking for PI 7.1
Thanks,
Nishant

Nishant,
THere is no much difference between PI 7.1 except webservices. File,IDOC,proxy will be similar.
Here by sending u new features of PI 7.1.Use ESOA for webservices scenario.
PI7.1 features refer this blog:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/706005a3-3bd6-2910-91ae-a2016239bdcf
Advanncements of PI 7.1
1. Enterprise Services Repository as a central storage location for enterprise service definitions and lifecycle management data for all enterprise services (Concept of Folders,.
Using Folders in PI 7.1
Using Folders in PI 7.1
2. Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration (UDDI) 3.0u2013compliant services registry for runtime management of enterprise services.
XI : How To publish WSDL generated from XI to UDDI
XI : How To publish WSDL generated from XI to UDDI
WebAS : A step by step guide for Configuring UDDI registry on Local Server
WebAS : A step by step guide for Configuring UDDI registry on Local Server
3. Enterprise Service Oriented Architecture (ESOA), Global Data Types, Modeling Tool Concept.
ESOA BASICS
SAP Architecture u2013Enterprise SOA Basics
SAP Architecture Enterprise SOA Basics
Quick Guides for setting up an eSOA prototyping environment with CE, ESR, and NWDS
Quick Guides for setting up an eSOA prototyping environment with CE, ESR, and NWDS
ESA = SOA + ES ?
ESA = SOA + ES ?
PRINCIPAL PROPAGATION
Principal Propagation with SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
Principal Propagation with SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
Principal Propagation in SAP XI
Principal Propagation in SAP XI
Modeling tools in PI 7.1
Modeling tools in PI 7.1
Publish services from PI 7.1 to the Service Registry
Publish services from PI 7.1 to the Service Registry
Using CCTS in PI 7.1
Using CCTS in PI 7.1
4. Improved support for standards such as Web Service Reliable Messaging (WS-RM), WS Policy, Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML).
5. Support Business Activity Monitoring (BAM).
XI: BAM - Episode III - new super trace
The specified item was not found.
XI: BAM - Episode II - Simple Proactive monitor
The specified item was not found.
XI: BAM - Episode I - Introduction s
The specified item was not found.
6. Advanced Adapter Engine Features (Eg. Bypass Integration Engine Process)
7. Enhancement for Mapping (Eg. Re-usable User Defined Functions, Look-up function reads multiple fields, Specify mapping parameters at configuration time, Synchronous DB RFC lookups, Message Packing etc.)
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Correct Structural Inconsistencies
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Correct Structural Inconsistencies
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Graphical Support for JDBC and RFC Lookups
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Graphical Support for JDBC and RFC Lookups
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Parameterized Message Mappings
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Parameterized Message Mappings
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1: Mapping Enhancements Blog Series
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1: Mapping Enhancements Blog Series
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Mapping Enhancements Demo
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Mapping Enhancements Demo
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Copy XML Subtree
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Copy XML Subtree
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Using Graphical Variable
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Using Graphical Variable
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Share User-Defined Functions
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Share User-Defined Functions
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Import SQL Table's Metadata
SAP PI 7.1 Mapping Enhancements Series: Import SQL Table's Metadata
MAPPING LOOK UPS
Lookupu2019s in XI made simpler
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/08/23/lookup146s-in-xi-made-simpler
XI: RFC Mapping lookups (from BC to XI?)
The specified item was not found.
Use this crazy piece for any RFC Mapping Lookups!
Use this crazy piece for any RFC Mapping Lookups!
SAP XI Lookup API: the Killer
The specified item was not found.
mapping look ups RFC api
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a03e7b02-eea4-2910-089f-8214c6d1b439
RFC Look up from XSLT mapping
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/05a3d62e-0a01-0010-14bc-adc8efd4ee14
Data Lookup Optimized
Data Lookup Optimized
8. Extended support for high volume scenarios
huge processing of files
Night Mare-Processing huge files in SAP XI
Step-by-Step Guide in Processing High-Volume Messages Using PI 7.1's Message Packaging
Step-by-Step Guide in Processing High-Volume Messages Using PI 7.1's Message Packaging
SAP XI acting as a (huge) file mover
The specified item was not found.
Managing bulky flat messages with SAP XI (tunneling once again) - UPDATED
The specified item was not found.
New NetWeaver Process Integration how-to guide for typical high volumen replication scenarios.
New NetWeaver Process Integration how-to guide for typical high volumen replication scenarios.
9. Business Activity Monitoring for process definition of milestone monitoring (event correlation).
10. Improved SAP NetWeaver Administrator support for central configuration and administration of both mediated and point-to-point scenarios.
11. XML payload validation and validations using JAVA.
VALIDATING MESSAGES
Validation of Messages in SAP NetWeaver Exchange Infrastructure - SDN Member Session EPI213 at SAP TechEd '06 Amsterdam
Validation of Messages in SAP NetWeaver Exchange Infrastructure - SDN Member Session EPI213 at SAP TechEd '06 Amsterdam
SOA Middleware: XML validation error handling
SOA Middleware: XML validation error handling
The Hitchhiker's Guide to Validation
The Hitchhiker's Guide to Validation
Validations using Java for those not having PI7.1
Validations using Java for those not having PI7.1
Xml validation
XML Validation BPM:
VALIDATING INCOMING FLAT FILE
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part 1
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part 1
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part II
Generic Approach for Validating Incoming Flat File in SAP XI - Part II
Validating messages in XI using XML Schema
Validating messages in XI using XML Schema
BPM:
Enhancements in ccBPM within SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
Enhancements in ccBPM within SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
12. Process editor modeling enhancements: step groups, integrated alert management and configurable parameters.
13. Integration of human interaction (generic user decision).
14. Language dependent texts for end-user display.
15. WS-BPEL 2.0 adoption (Preview and implementation BPEL4People, BPLE-SPE Simple User Defined Functions can be configured directly in the process.)
Also refer this links for more clarifications:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d6/369142f195675ee10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/fb4cd3207c7063e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f36ce30f-0e01-0010-a89b-c158d07c44ff
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ec19c05d-0501-0010-09a2-b6db51b5318d
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5441afe5-0601-0010-dba5-dc5f9d5caa9d
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c50cddbb-0601-0010-92a7-f2a40ca68e6d
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f027dde5-e16e-2910-97a4-f231046429f2
Refer these threads as well:
Advantages of using PI 7.1 over PI 7.0
PI 7.0 and XI 3.0
http adaptor on which factors we will use
Diff between XI and PI
differences between xi 3.0 and pi 7.0
Difference/ changes from XI 3.0 to PI 7.0
give me main advantages of XI-7.0 TO XI-3.0
XI 7.0 vs Xi 3.0
XI/PI
XI vs. PI
XI 3.0 vs. PI (XI 7.0)
Difference/ changes from XI 3.0 to PI 7.0
moving from XI 3.0 to PI 7
Edited by: VenkataPrabhakar Teegavarapu on Dec 2, 2008 1:48 PM

Scenarios for FICO report

Hi gurus
     anybody please say a scenario for
1)Exception
2)Condition,
3)Variables,
4)RRI
for FICO based reports... its urgent ..please help me out...
   i will assign points
Thanks in advance
pradeep

See below scenarios on which you can implement Exceptions, conditions,........etc on keyfigs.
1. Balance Sheet and P&L: Actual/Actual Comparison
Technical name: 0FIGL_VC1_Q0001
Based on: Virtual InfoCube 0FIGL_VC1
Use
This query is used to display the balance sheet and P&L in two different report periods. The report periods are broken down in the columns, the balance sheet structure/P&L is displayed hierarchically in the report rows.
The balance sheet/P&L is created for exactly one company code. This must be entered using a variable.
Filters
InfoObject     Description of the InfoObject (and restriction or calculation formula)
0COMP_CODE     Company code, variable 0P_COCD (individual value, required entry)
0VERSION     Version, constant value 1
0CURTYPE     Currency type, constant value 10 (company code currency)
0VTYPE     Version, constant value 10 (actual)
0FISCVARNT     Fiscal year variant, variable 0P_FVAEX (SAP exit variable)
User-Defined Characteristics
InfoObject     Description
0BUS_AREA     Business area
0GL_ACCOUNT     General ledger account
Rows
InfoObject     Description of the InfoObject (and restriction or calculation formula)
0GLACCEXT     Balance sheet/P&L item
Columns
InfoObject     Description of the InfoObject (and restriction or calculation formula)
Structure     Key figures
0FIGL_VC1_CK001     1.              Balance value, calculated key figure for the 0FIGL_VC1:
0FIGL_VC1_CK001 = 0VAL_STOCK + 0VAL_FLOW
Structure     Periods:
Report period     1.              Selection for characteristic 0FISCPER, variable 0I_FPER
Comparison period     2.              Selection for characteristic 0FISCPER, varianble 0FI_FPER2 (= copy of variable 0I_FPER)
Absolute variance     3.              Formula:
Report period comparison period
Variance (%)     4.              Formula:
Report period % comparison period
2. Bal. Sheet and P&L (Cost-of-Sales Acc.): Actl/Actl Comparison
Technical name: 0FIGL_VC2_Q0001
Based on: virtual InfoCube 0FIGL_VC2
Use
This query is used to display the balance sheet and P&L according to the cost-of-sales accounting method in two different reporting periods. The reporting periods are expanded in the columns, the balance sheet/P&L item (hierarchically) in the reporting rows.
The balance sheet/P&L is created for a single company code that must be entered using a variable.
Filters
InfoObject     Description of the InfoObject (and restriction or calculation formula)
0COMP_CODE     Company code, variable 0P_COCD (individual value, required entry)
0VERSION     Version, constant value 1
OCURTYPE     Currency type, constant value 10 (company code currency)
0TYPE     Value type, constant value 10 (actual)
0FISCVARNT     Fiscal year variant, variable 0P_FVAEX (SAP exit variable)
User-Defined Characteristics
InfoObject     Description
0BUS_AREA     Business area
0FUNC_AREA     Functional area
0GL_ACCOUNT     G/L account
Rows
InfoObject     Description of the InfoObject (and restriction or calculation formula)
0GLACCEXT     Balance sheet/P&L item
Columns
InfoObject     Description of the InfoObject (and restriction or calculation formula)
Structure     Key figures
     Balance sheet value, calculated key figure for InfoCube 0FIGL_VC2:
0FIGL_VC2_CK001 = 0VAL_STOCK + 0VAL_FLOW
Structure     Time periods
Report time period     Selection for characteristic 0FISCPER, variable 0I_FPER
Comparison period     Selection for characteristic 0FISCPER, variable 0I_FPER2 (= copy of variable 0I_FPER)
Variance (absolute)     Formula: Report period - Comparison period
Variance (%)     Formula: Report period % Comparison period

Billing document output needs to tigger for multiple emails.

Hi Experts,
We have a scenario wherein a single billing document output gets triggered for multiple emails. The requirement is to send the invoice layout copy to multiple emails where we maintain customer mail ids in customer master record.
When tried ,we found option in customer master record and maintained multiple email ids to send the billing output.The system has considered first email id from customer master record and did not consider next mail ids from CMR. Could you please suggest how can we suffice this requirement .
Thanks in advance.
KV.

Hi,
Email Address is maintained in Table ADR6 against the address number of table BUT000 for a particaluar BP.
If the custom code is used, following logic can be used:
For multiple email address multiple entry will be there in ADR6 for the same address number. To send the correspondence to all email address, select all entries and concatenate them separated with semi-colon ( and pass the same to the email address field.
This is working in our case where we are using a third party for creating and sending the PDF.
Regards,
Pranavjeet.

Triggering billing output for multiple emails

Hi Experts,
We have a scenario wherein a single billing document output gets triggered for multiple emails. The requirement is to send the invoice layout copy to multiple emails where we maintain customer mail ids in customer master record.
When tried ,we found option in customer master record and maintained multiple email ids to send the billing output.The system has considered first email id from customer master record and did not consider next mail ids from CMR. Could you please suggest now how can we suffice this requirement .
Thanks in advance.
KV

Dear Kv rekha,
Check whether the following thread helps you.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Snippets/Howtosendmailtoadistributionlistoragroup+ID
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles

Help in Function Module for Sending Email to Supplier afetr Registration

Hi Team
I am beginner in ABAP, need your help in finding solution for the below issue.The Scenario is between MDM to SRM(R/3 System)
External supplier when registers, system need to generate a unique identification number ( Registration Number / Profile Number ) for the supplier and also generate a PIN ( password ) for the Registration Number, so that users from supplier company can request a user id to be created.These user idu2019s will be then linked to the supplier profile using the registration number.Also, supplier needs to be communicated with the Registration and PIN number via email.
FOr the email we are using the FM"ZGVMP_SUPPLIER_REGISTRATION".
My query is when the supplier is receiving the email , he is getting the email from the name GVMPUIDC(i.e the system id, it is being sent by the syetm id or user id of the program).
I want the mail to be sent by the following name to the supplier by different name instead of GVMPUIDC.
please help in solving the problem
Thanks
Edited by: VArjun86 on Dec 5, 2011 11:12 AM

Hi Kesshav
The FM which i am using is zgvmp_supplier_registration..
Below is the code which is being used to send the emails.
Send emails to Registration from Suppliers only
    if not wa_contact-name1 is initial and
       not wa_contact-name2 is initial.
      if sy-sysid = 'NSP'.
        perform send_email.
      else.
        perform send_html_email.
      endif.
    endif.
please let me know if you require any more details

Setting Importance Level for a email message using javax.mail.* API

Setting Importance Level for a email message using javax.mail.* API
From what I understand we can set Flag on Email Message. How can we set Importance Leve: High/Low for an email message?
Thanks
Purvi

Most of the message Flags work only for IMAP mailboxes. POP3 supports only the DELETED flag. It must be understood that Javamail is a framework which provides all the features available in a standard mailing system. But whether or not a particular feature works is a functionality of the particular implementation being used.
Thus for example POP3 cannot differentiate read from unread messages in a mailbox though Javamail provides that feature.

Best Practices for Implementing BI7.0

Dear all,
We are currently in BI 3.5 and have planned to go for BI 7.0.I have a few questions
1. Is the BI in Netweaver 2004s is BI7.0?
2. What are the best practices to go for BI 7.0? I found few documents regarding the Best Practices in service.sap.com
3. Where can I find more detailed information and documents for implementing BI7.0?
If you have any document can you please send it to
(yo - no email addresses in here buddy boy)
Thanks & Regards,
Chandran Gansan
Message was edited by: Ron Silberstein

Dear Chandran,
1. Is the BI in Netweaver 2004s is BI7.0?
>> I read some posts before that the correct term should be SAP Netweaver 2004s; Whereas the SAP BW3.5 is referred to SAP Netweaver 2004. I hope I am not mistaken.
2. What are the best practices to go for BI 7.0? I found few documents regarding the Best Practices in service.sap.com
3. Where can I find more detailed information and documents for implementing BI7.0?
>> Since you have access to the SAP service marketplace, kindly check under the categories: bi, bifaq, sevices & implementation.
Hope this helps..
Thanks...

Give me the Best Scenario for Chemical Manufacturing

Hi Experts
Pls Give me the Best Scenario for following:
To make XYZ there is two stages as follows:
To make Semi finished item ABC for XYZ: (My Scenario: Prod. Order1)
Item A + Item B + Item C
To make Final item XYZ: (My Scenario: Prod. Order2)
Semi finished item ABC + Item X + Item Y + Item Z
Finally I will get the Finished Item XYZ in ltrs:
Again my client will sells as like XYZ 100ml, XYZ 200ml, XYZ 450ml, XYZ 2ltrs, XYZ 5ltrs, XYZ 20ltrs.
No :1 (My Scenario: Goods issue in ltrs for Finished Item XYZ in ltrs)
No:2 (My Scenario: Make Goods Receipt against the Good issue qty
For Ex: Good issue
XYZ -3ltrs u20131000Rs
Good receipt:
XYZ 2ltrs-1--2litres-666.666Rs
XYZ 450ml -2----900ml-300.333Rs
XYZ 100ml -1-----100ml--033.00Rs So total 3litres and 1000Rs of Good Issue (XYZ -3ltrs u20131000Rs).
Here in my scenario I am some what feeling that lot of chances is there to miss the price difference B/n G.I & G.R, calculation of qty to match the good issue and Calculation of correct item price to have Item cost.
So how to Overcome this issueu2026u2026.
This is Standard Process for The items to sell:
Also the items XYZ 100ml will be sold in One Box which has 60 bottles of each 100ml.
Also the items XYZ 200ml will be sold in One Box which has 30 bottles of each 200ml.
Also the items XYZ 450ml will be sold in One Box which has 24 bottles of each 450ml.
Also the items XYZ 2litres will be sold in One Box which has 10 Jars of each 2litres.
Also while selling, Cartoons or Box used for packing the goods so inventory of packaging has to be reduce while doing Delivery document.
So Pls give me the Best way to implement in Our SAP.
Item master setup:
XYZ 100mlu2014Sales UoM:Bottles-Item per sales unit:60-Packaging UoM(Sales):1Cartoon u2013 60Bottles.
Eagerly waiting for your reply
Giri
Edited by: Giri dharan on Oct 13, 2009 3:58 PM

Hi
I will get Finished Item XYZ, but again i have to convert to xyz 100ml, xyz 450ml, xyz 2ltrs.... also these are maintained in different item codes.
SO how to convert this to xyz 100ml, xyz 450ml, xyz 2ltrs.. from Finished ITem XYZ....
Because this xyz 100ml, xyz 450ml, xyz 2ltrs.. will be varry in production from Finished item XYZ , the production will be according to sales order most of the time.
Pls give me the scenerio.......
Giri

Scenarios for implementing email

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for