Scope Entities under the selected Consolidation Group

Hi Experts,
During running of Consolidation, I have a logic to compute the translation of Retained Earnings via Account Transformation. Now my problem is that the logic calculates for all Entities. As a result there are data in other Entities even though they are not part of the consolidation group. In the MS version, we used the function below to filter Entities that are active under the selected consolidation group but it seems that this is not supported here in NW. Any function I can use to scope only the Entities that are active in the selected conso group?
To scope active Entities in MS:
*XDIM_GETINPUTSET ENTITY=%MYENT%
*APP=OWNERSHIP
*XDIM_MEMBERSET GROUPS=%GROUPS_SET%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET OWNACCOUNT=ACTIVE
*CRITERIA SIGNEDDATA>=1
*ENDXDIM
Conso Script Logic:
//CALCULATE RETAINED EARNINGS TRANSLATION
*RUN_PROGRAM CALC_ACCOUNT
   CATEGORY = %CATEGORY_SET%
   CURRENCY = USD
   TID_RA = %TIME_SET%
   OTHER = [GROUPS=%GROUPS_SET%,NON_GROUP]
   CALC = RE_BEG
*ENDRUN_PROGRAM
//TRANSLATE TO GROUP CURRENCY
*RUN_PROGRAM CURR_CONVERSION
   CATEGORY = %CATEGORY_SET%
   GROUP = %GROUPS_SET%
   TID_RA = %TIME_SET%
   RATEENTITY = GLOBAL
   MEASURES=YTD
*ENDRUN_PROGRAM
//RUN CONSOLIDATION RULES
*RUN_PROGRAM CONSOLIDATION
   CATEGORY = %CATEGORY_SET%
   GROUP = %GROUPS_SET%
   TID_RA = %TIME_SET%
   MEASURES=YTD
*ENDRUN_PROGRAM
Thanks in advance,
Marvin

Hi Marvin,
Normally we have a consolidation hierarchy structure in Entity Dimentsion also, so you can add entity filter in script logic and DM and run CALC_ACCOUNT for this group only.
Anil

Similar Messages

User Profile Sync - Fields That Appear Under the "Person or Group" Column

As I go to add a new column to a list on SharePoint 2010, I notice some fields under the drop down labeled "Show field". Inside that drop down there is a "Test" and a couple others I see in there that I don't notice in the User Profile
Sync. Forgive me, I've inherited this SharePoint config. Where should I be looking to find these phantom fields or how can I erase them?
Thank you!

Those fields are part of the schema for the "Person or Group" field type and are not related to the UPS.
Trevor Seward, MCC
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Function Moudule not showing under the Function Group in SE80

Hi guys
I transported a couple of newly developed Function Modules to the R3Q ( Quality System) under an exsitng Function Group. the FM are all transported perfectly and the report is also working but in SE80 where u can see a function group and all its related objects i dont see the name of my newly developed FM. Why is that?
I tried transporting my Function Group etc.. but still i am not able to see my new FM's.
When i go to my FM's attributes tab, it shows its under the right function Group. but only in SE80 its not showing up.
Any ideas y ?
Thanks
Moderator message - Please do not use txtspeak in the forum
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jul 18, 2011 9:52 AM

Hi Adnan;
Are you sure you haven't dont release second or more requests for FG?
If you have more requests, your FG may hasn't be last FM list.
Yo can check below include in SAPLZ<FG> function pool.
INCLUDE LZ<FG>UXX. " Function Modules
Are you seeing last FM list?
Best regards.

BCS 604 SP6 - Change to Consolidation Group extra features

Hi All,
We've upgraded from SP0 to SP6 and noticed some new options for CCG config:
IN UCWB we have rthe following new options:
1. under Consolidation area --> Settings --> Consolidation Functions used, we have:
(checkbox) Separation of Goodwill from Investment (ERP 2005)
2. Under Changes to Consolidation group we had:
- Selected Items
- Task
- Document Type
- System Utilization - NEW
> (checkbox) Other Comprehensive Income in Total Divestiture
Help on "1" reveals:
If you select this checkbox, you enable the separation of goodwill from the investment relationship.
Use
If the Separation of Goodwill from Investment function is active, you can manually enter a goodwill entry on a separate consolidation unit for the Reclassification of Treasury Stock activity. The system does not post a minority interest to effects from valuation allowance or currency translation. The system suppresses the posting of minority interests on the assumption that no investment and equity data exist for a separate consolidation unit for which you have entered a manual goodwill entry. (However, the system does not check whether investment and equity data on the separate consolidation unit really do not exist.)
Help on "2":
Other Comprehensive Income in Total Divestiture
If you select this checkbox, you enable the system to post the other comprehensive income in the Total Divestiture activity with an effect on net income.
Use
If the Other Comprehensive Income in Total Divestiture function is active, the system posts the group value of the other comprehensive income in total divestiture to the income statement.
Dependencies
You define the items for other comprehensive income as a subset of the equity items in Equity Data Customizing on the Other Comprehensive Income tab page. You specify there for each item for other comprehensive income the relevant posting item in the income statement.
Anyone used either of these extra features,
found them useful, any problems?

I have not used the 1st "Separation of Goodwill".
The second feature is needed when Cons of Investment (COI) is not used. I actually configured Cons Grp Chgs with this and subsequently implemented COI in the same system. What happened is that this feature disappeared from Cons Grp Chgs and reappeared in COI > Settings > Appropriation of Retained Earnings.
I hope this helps.

Consolidation group change without ownership change

Hi All,
I require help in resolving this particular issue.
I have a company called 1000 which is having a subsidiary called 5010. both of the fall under the same consolidiation group called CG1.
Now I have run the First consolidation as of March 2009 and carry forwarded the balances in 2009.
Now 5010 has invested in 6 more companies and has become a holding company to them.
Now I thought of two options
1. To just create these 6 companies and enter the investment details for these companies and run the COI.
2. To create a new consolidation group called CG2. Put the 5010 company along with its 6 newly acquired subsidiaries under this consoldation group.
I ma exercising the option 2 by creating a new consolidation group as it will easy to get the reports at CG2 level.
As you can observe there has been no transfer of investment happening here. How do i take care of such a situation.
I read the posts regarding the Consolidation group changes but all posts were dealing with change in ownership happening. In my case there is no change in ownership as 1000 still continues to be the holding company. But only difference is that earlier 5010 was existing as a end node but now It has to have a consolidation group of its own where in it will have the holding company 5010 along with its 6 subsidiaries.
Pl give me a solution.
Thanks in advance.
Shivaprasad

facts of the scenario
1. Did first consolidation in period 012.2008
2. There is a company 5510 which belongs to CG1 as of first consolidation which was in period 012.2008
3. 5510 has invested in 6 new companies in period 003.2009
4. I want to create a new consolidation group CG2 and put the existing company 5510 along with 6 new companies under this group (client requirement)
5. I created a new consolidation group CG2 and assigned the company 5510 to this group along with 6 new companies
6. In consolidation group CG1 mentioned the divesture period as 003.2009 (DABP ticked) for 5510 company
7. in Consolidation group CG2 mentioned the First consolidation period as 003.2009 (FCEP unticked) against 5510 company
8. The figures are not accurate at the CG2 group level.
Should I be doing anything else apart from the above steps.
Will appreciate a fast reply as it is stopping the go-live
Thanks in advance
Shivaprasad

Problems with the selected item in a JList

Hi,
I am using a JList with a JTextPane as renderer, when I select an item in the list the foreground color is black instead of being white and when I go up in the list the foreground color of the items under the selected one is white (they are not visible anymore).
Does anyone know why this list behaves like that and what I should do to prevent this?
Thanks in advance
Here's the code of the renderer (I suppose this is the place where the problems are):
public class TextPaneListRenderer extends JTextPane implements ListCellRenderer
public TextPaneListRenderer()
setOpaque(true);
public Component getListCellRendererComponent(JList list, Object value, int index, boolean isSelected, boolean cellHasFocus)
this.setText(value.toString());
if (cellHasFocus)
setBackground(list.getSelectionBackground());
setForeground(list.getSelectionForeground());
else
setBackground(list.getBackground());
setForeground(list.getForeground());
return this;
getListCellRendererComponent() not yet implemented.");
}

Hi,
i would use isSelected:
if (isSelected)
setBackground(list.getSelectionBackground());
setForeground(list.getSelectionForeground());
else
setBackground(list.getBackground());
setForeground(list.getForeground());
It might help, just give it a try.

Image Trace colors don't match selected color group. (Mac, CS6)

When I select the Document Library option when making a color image trace, the colors shift in the image but do not match the selected color group. I've tried multiple color groups, and the colors always change, but never match the selected swatches. Is this typical? Can anyone explain this?

After some additional experimentation, I discovered the problem was with images dragged from iPhoto and dropped into an illustrator file. When I placed the files instead, the colors matched the selected color group. After trying several other images using both methods, it appears as if dragging and dropping from iPhoto is a no-no when wanting to image trace and change the colors.

Huge block of blank space under the tab area?

Ok i just recently downloaded the fire fox 4, i been using 3 forever and i like the look of it but.. on the top bar under the selected tab there is a wide swath of wasted space all the way across the screen and about 2x as wide as the tab, i want to make that go away i like keeping the top area as small as possible.

ok... i'm an idiot just seconds after posting this i was looking thru the options and i found that it was "conduit engine" toolbar and i got rid of it so sorry for wasting everyones time.

Total Transfer between paralel consolidation groups

Hello Gurus!
We are using SEM-BCS for legal consolidation of our consolidation hierarchy. The hierarchy stands as shown below in 04.2014:
CG00
     CU000
      CG20
          CU005
          CU001
     CG01
          CG19
               CU018
     CG02
     CG03
In period 04.2014, we have to make a transfer of one consolidation unit (CU001) from consolidation group CG19 to CG20.
In consolidation group CG19 in 03.2014, company CU001 is hold at 100% by consolidation unit CU018.
In consolidation group CG20 in 04.2014, company CU001 is transferred to this consolidation group, as well as the participation (100% of the shares) from company CU018 to company CU005.
The holding of the hierarchy is CU000 in CG00.
To execute the transfer, we created organizational change company and organizational change number in the master data tab. Afterwards, company CU001 was changed from consolidation group CG19 to CG20. In the company CU001 we set the mark for first consolidation with organizational change and indicated the ID of the organizational change.
After this definitions in the master data tab, we executed the task for consolidation group changes, obtaining the following result:
Balance sheet items were correctly posted in group CG20, as this the destination group of the transfer. But on the other hand, the elimination from the previous consolidation group (CG19) is being wrongly executed, as the elimination is being executed in consolidation group CG00, when this should be posted in CG19.
Could you help us understand what is being wrongly made, for the post being made in CG00 and not in CG19.
Thanks in advanced.

Thank you for your reply Dan.
Responding to your questions:
1) The operation wasn't made with indication of divestiture in period 004/2014. However I tried to test it with that indicator (divestiture with OC), and the results weren't diferent from the ones i'm obtain now.
2) The consolidation group changes were executed.
3) The whole balance sheet accounts. The consolidation group changes were executed at levels 02, 12 and 22.

Usage Based Optimization Wizard not finding Queries for Selected Measure Group (2008)

I have configured my analysis services server to capture queries in an OLAP Query Log table. The connection string points to a table on a SQL Server relational database. I have verified that the dbo.OlapQueryLog table was created. I have set it to
capture every 5th query. The table has been collecting query statistics for several hours. I opened my model in BIDS, clicked on the cube and opened the Aggregations tab. I click on the measure group partition and select the Usage Based Optimization
button. The wizard opens up and I click next. In the "Specify Query Criteria" dialog, there is a warning that there "are no queries in the log for the selected measure group". The problem is that there are queries but the UBO
Wizard doesn't seem to be finding them. Do I need to set a property in the BIDS to point to the location of the query log file in the relational database?
davidg12

Hi David,
Is your SSAS database name and ID are same? We came across same kind of issue while ago. We initially created our database with one name and later renamed the database.
The database name and ID should be same in order to perform Usage Based Optimization.
To do so,
On the solution explorer the top node is the database.
Right click on that node and click edit database. In the property windown you should be able to see ID. The ID and the name of the database should be the same.
If both are not same, Change the database name to match ID.
Please mark as Answer if this helps!
Rajasekhar.

New consolidation group with wrong values

Hi all,
We are working with SEM-BCS 6.0 and we are having an issue that we hope you can help us.
At 012.2008 we have created a new consolidation group (N002) with the consolidation unit 0100.
This consolidation unit (0100) also exists in consolidation group (H001) since 006.2008.
The problem is that at 012.2008 when we use the posting logic u201Cstandardu201D the account values are correct in the consolidation group that used to exist (H001), but for the new consolidation group (N002) the account values are only the delta values.
For example:
011.2008
Account 111000 = 50.000u20AC
012.2008
Account 111000= 60.000u20AC
At 012.2008 in the consolidation group (H001) we have the 60.000u20AC but in the consolidation group N002 the account only has 10.000u20AC (delta)
But if the new consolidation group (N002) only exists since 012.2008 and for the consolidation unit 0100 the first consolidation is defined as 012.2008 why is only being considered the delta (10.000u20AC) and not the all value (60.000u20AC)?
Thanks for your help.
Best regards

We are using the cumulative type of data storing.
Sorry, you can't. It's the system that always stores data periodically. You may just load data cumulatively.
Regardless of type of your load data in the system is always kept periodically.
> The reason for the appearance of this company in another group is only because they want to do a u201Csecondu201D consolidation considering a different group of companies by consolidation area.
> That is, they want to consolidate both consolidation groups with the same companies but with them being considered differently by consolidation areas.
> Is like the second consolidation group is a simulation.
Sorry, Ricardo, I cannot read it in business terms. Different hierarchies, dif. ConsAreas, dif. groups... I do not see why and what for.

BCS - Divestiture consolidation group change

Is there a FM module that would tell me when a company was divested and what the new consolidation group would be?
I'm not a BCS consultant.

There may not be a FM for this.
When you define the consolidation units and consolidation group in BCS in the context of consolidating investments and eliminating inter comoany diviidends.
Even there, you may not get the date on which the disinvesment took place. Consolidation of investments will be carried on a "given day" on which the Balance sheet and BS are drawn.
Ravi Thothadri

Consolidation Group Change and Consolidation Activity

Hi Experts,
I am new in SAP consolidation, I have a question regarding the difference between the function "consolidation group change" and "consolidation activity".
If I read in the sap library, these 2 functions are separated, but if I look at the content, I saw some similarity where the consolidation group change also included the investment activity like acquisition and divestiture.
Could anyone explain what are the difference between these 2 function?
When I was a user, if the group acquiered a new cons unit, I just add a new cons unit in the consolidation group hierarchy, assign consolidation method, add the additional financial data for the ownership percentage (activity = first consolidation), enter the reported financial data, run CI function and add one more column in my report painter.
When I read SAP library, I saw the "consolidation group change" function talking about the consolidation activity, now I wonder, what are the difference? What is the business scenario for using the "normal" CI activity and the "consolidation group change"? Please anyone advise. Thank you.
regards,

Normal C/I is a regular acquisition or divestiture. Cons Group Change could be movement of a company from one consolidation group to another (i.e., parent A sells company 1 to parent B). Or you own a company 20% and purchase an additional 60% and must switch accounting technique from Equity to Purchase. BCS will need to book Cons Group Change entries to account for the acct technique change. (In the past, at 20%, you would only book equity pickup, or equitization entries, to the parent as PL30 adjustments in the CoI. Now you must bring in the complete balances of the company due to purchase method of consolidation. BCS books consolidation-group specific adjustments to do this.)
Example....
"Normal C/I activity"
New company A needs be consolidated in Cons Group 1 starting in 03/2007. Add the company to the Cons Group master data, set the accounting technique, update additional financial data w/ activity First consolidation and load data for the new company. Run COI
"Cons Group Change"
Company A is consolidated in Cons Group 1, but starting in 06/2007 they will be sold to a parent in Cons Group 2. Update the Cons Group master data...setting company A to divest in 06/2007 from CG1 and to First Consolidate in CG2 starting in 06/2007. If using Org Change logic, create an Org Change number and define a sender/receiver relationship for CG1 --> CG2. In additional financial data, create a total transfer activity w/ org change logic from CG1 to CG2. Run Org Change task and BCS will zero out balance sheet related to company A in CG1 on posting level 02/12/22. In CG2, similar postings will book "catch up" entries in 06/2007 to bring full balance sheet into CG2. In CoI, company will be transferred to new parent.
Hopefully that makes sense...
Chris

Consolidation Group Hierarchy in the reports

Hello exports,
Recently we had a consolidation group hierarchy cahnge. We moved a cons unit from one cons group to other. I did not use the drag and drop of course. The change had been made from 01.10.
The consolidation group is time depended.
The problem regards the queries I have: when I open the combo box of the "consolidation group hierarchy" I expect to get
2 optional hierarchies: one for the previous hierarchy and second for current hierarchy.
Instead I get to see only the current hierarchy. In my point of view it is wrong because users who would like to watch reports for 30.09 can only get to see the new hierarchy which is not relevant for 30.09 yet.
Any ideas anyone ?
Thanks

Collet Hi,
Thanks again. The resaults are correct , this is not the problem.
Let me use an example in order to simplify the problem:
Suppose I made an organizational change in 01.10 in which CC A became CG A and owns some other CC under it.
From your point of view, from 01.10 and on the users will see on the selection screen only CG A,
Even if they rather produce the report for 30.09, they wont be able to select CC A.
By the way, on the result screen of the query the hierarchy acts perfectly- just like the hierarchy has been at the specified date, 30.09. As I mentioned- the only problem is relevant for the selection screen.
Thanks again

Title Bar stuck under the Menu bar and I cannot select and move it.

I often arrange windows around the desktop and sometimes I inadvertently push a window up too far and the title bar gets under the menu bar. Once I let go of the arrow, the title bar is too far under the menu bar and I can no longer reach it to move it down. The only solution is to close out the program and start over. Is there a way unbeknownst to me to select the title bar again and move it?
Sharon

My E*Trade streaming watch list was stuck under the Menu Bar also. I tried reseting the screen resolution down to 1280 x 1024, and restarting the MarketTrader. There on the display was the stuck window, out from under. I resized and moved it to a central location, and resized the display back to my normal 1920 setting. And to my relief, the window Bar! Thanks Discussion!

Scope Entities under the selected Consolidation Group

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for