Scritical scenarious and critical threads

Iam attending an interview after 2 days could anyone send me real time scenarios in GL,AP,AR please to this id [email protected]
please help me ..i will reward this points..
its very urgent ..hope to see some replys to my email id
thanks in advance

Julius wrote:
> 1 abuse raises an alert.
> 10 abuses automatically removes the post.
>
Otto Gold wrote:
> Ok, but I don´t want to waste the time of the moderators. Somebody has to go through the abuse report.
>
Otto if what Julius says is true then no one needs to go through the abuse/stupid category report. After 10 negatives the post is removed automatically. I guess in your case you would want the offending post to be relocated to the Playground forum rather than removed completely.
I suppose you could keep the existing abuse button and after 10 negatives the post is relocated to the playground forum. Moderators could then decide what step to take next. Remove the post, leave in playground, reinstate in original forum or reinstate in original forum with warning, etc.
Che
Edited by: Che Eky on Dec 22, 2010 5:47 PM

Similar Messages

Why is time-critical thread not interrupting sleepless high priority thread?

Hello,
I have two threads running in the same execution system on a real-time PXI platform. The time-critical thread sleeps using "AI Single Scan.VI", and acquires my data at a rate of 8000 Hz.
I have a slower high priority process that calls a DLL function to calculate some filter coefficients. This function call takes longer than 1/8000 s to complete, and runs in a loop, executing as often as it can (with new data from FIFOs).
I expected the time-critical thread to interrupt the the high priority thread without problem.
I am finding that unless I insert a LabVIEW delay (for example a wait for x ms VI) in the loop, the real-time system stops responding. With a small delay (ie 1 ms), t
he acquisition completes, and a FIFO shuts down the loop of the slow process.
Why do I need a labVIEW delay in the high-priority loop, when the DLL function call itself is quite slow? Even without a DLL call, I would expect the time-critical VI to interrupt, finish its data acquisition, and shut-down the high-priority thread using its FIFO.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Frenk

Here are a couple things to try/check:
1) Check the call library node in your high priority VI. If it's orange (runs in UI thread), your high priority VI is actually switching to the UI thread every time your dll runs. That alone is not a problem. But if your TC VI tries to update any control terminals, the TC thread will switch over to the UI thread to access UI resources, possibly while the dll within your high priority VI has a lock on those resources. Why does the dll have a lock on UI resources? Because it was running in the UI thread and got interrupted by the TC thread before it finished doing its business. Not likely, but possible.
2) There's another possible reason you're seeing this behavior. If the TC VI and the high VI call a mutual subVI, the subVI will be elevated to ALWAYS run in the highest priority thread irrespective of the actual caller (in your case, it's the the TC thread). Even when the *high priority VI* calls the mutual subVI, that subVI runs in the time-critical thread, which means there's a thread switch from high to TC, then back to high after the subVI finishes. And because high and TC VIs are in the same exec system, that mutual subVI will always run in the 1 and only TC thread alotted to that exec system.
So, while your TC VI is running, you're in the TC thread. While, your high VI is running, you're in a high non-TC thread, and when your high VI calls the mutual subVI, you're again in the TC thread until the subVI finishes.
So how could this arrangement cause your TC VI to become starved by the high VI? If your TC VI wakes up while the high VI is in the middle of running the mutual subVI, the TC thread responsible for running the TC VI is actually busy (in the middle of running the subVI in your high VI!!!), so the TC thread cannot run your TC VI until it finishes running that mutual subVI.
The fix: make your TC VI run in a different exec system. It will be given its own TC thread that no one else can mess with. When TC VI wakes up, it's guaranteed a TC thread.
I think there's a good reason behind why a mutual subVI ALWAYs runs at the highest priority of all its callers, irrespective of the actual caller's priority...but I can't think of the reason at the moment.

Will there be a fix for Firefox's problems with Hotmail. I have gone back to 3.5.9 but mostly I am disappointed by the lack of action on this serious problem where a major and critical feature of a major international website is unavailable in the Firefox

Will there be a fix for Firefox's problems with Hotmail. I have gone back to 3.5.9 but mostly I am disappointed by the lack of action on this serious problem where a major and critical feature of a major international website is unavailable in the Firefox browser.
== URL of affected sites ==
http://www.hotmail.com

We've reached out to the Hotmail team and they've determined that this is a bug in their code. (It was masked by a timing issue in 3.5 that was fixed in 3.6.) We've worked with them to develop a fix but they may not have deployed it yet.

Memory leaks and multi threading issues in managed client.

In our company we use a lot of Oracle, and after the release of the managed provider we migrated all applications to it. First the things were very impressive : the new client was faster, but after some days applications that uses 100MB with old client goes to 1GB and up. The memory is not the only issue, we use a lot of multi threading, and we experience connection drops and not disposal, after 1 days working one of the application had over 100 sessions on the server. I think there is something wrong with connection pool and multi threading.
Is someone experience same problems.
Yesterday we went back with unmanaged provider. Now things are back to normal.

connection drops: did you try to use "Validate Connection=true" parameter in your connection string?
the new client was faster: are you sure with this statement? Even in 64bit environment? I got quite serious performance problems when running application under 64bit process: https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2595323

RE: DBSessions and Single-threading

Thanks Linh. Always good to here from you.
thanks
ka
Kamran Amin
Forte Technical Leader, Core Systems
(203)-459-7362 or 8-204-7362 - Trumbull
[email protected]
From: Linh Pham[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 1998 2:51 PM
To: Ajith Kallambella M; [email protected]; ForteUsers;
[email protected]
Subject: RE: DBSessions and Single-threading
all,
This information (technote draft # 11716) is to clear up the confusion
regarding
database access.
Note, Forte reserves the right to change this implementation in the
future.
Currently, there are two flavors of database access available with forte
(as of version 30j1):
1. single-threading access to all databases on all UNIX & VMS platforms
2. multithreading access to all supported database except Sybase on
intel/alpha-NT,
and to a certain extent, limited support with SQLServer (see more
details below)
1. single-threading access:
with this type of access, when the following code is executed
(SQL select ... on MyDBSession;), forte locks the partition and
all EXTERNAL requests will be queued. However, task switching inside
the partition continues until the called task enters the DBVendor's
API (as with any 3GL call). Prior to this moment, you can still have
multiple tasks running inside the partition. As the called task
enters the 3GL, it truly blocks a partition, ie. it's OUT there
talking to the database and not communicating with the
the forte's environment. If the query is long, the partition might not
be
able to acknowledge the environment manager's ping, and thus, will be
deemed NOT reachable, and a new partition will be started (see technote
11147). Another problem arises when you have multiple INTERNAL tasks
trying to perform database access concurrently on the same DBSession.
Since the behavior is unpredictable, we RECOMMEND that you only
have ONE task at any time accessing the DBSession inside a partition.
Please see also technote 7104 for more information regarding DBSession
sharing & blocking.
2. multi-threading access:
on NT, we have added code to allow multithreading access to most
supported
database. What does this mean?
a. when a task access the database, the partition will NOT be blocked.
b. you can have multiple DBSessions inside a partition and allow
concurrent access; however, we still RECOMMEND that you
only have ONE task accessing a DBSession at any one time.
Please consult a Forte consultant or a TSR in reference to technote
11151 (only available internally). Please do NOT call Forte Technical
Support for this technote.
As to SQLServer, the ODBC driver that you use to access the database
will
determine if it's is reentrant or not. There is also a known problem
with
the Microsoft ODBC driver which causes the cursor state to become
invalid when
multiple tasks accessing the same session. Due to these problems, forte
recommends that you single-threading access to SQLServer; otherwise
use at YOUR OWN RISK.
Hope this helps. IF you have questions regarding multithreading access
support
in the future, please contact a Forte Sales Rep or TSR.
linh ...
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Ajith Kallambella M
Sent: Friday, November 13, 1998 9:08 AM
To: [email protected]; ForteUsers; [email protected]
Subject: RE: DBSessions and Single-threading
Though, the DBSession partitions can reside on a
thread-safe
OS ( like NT ), the DBSession is still single threaded
and your
partition gets blocked for the duration of the DB
access. Same
is true, even if you have multi-threaded databases.
Forte has not changed DBSession to make it
multi-threaded.
Infact, given the current implementation, the only way
to simulate
concurrent database access is to replicate the
partition which
has DBSession object. The famous DBEntityManagerPattern
does essentially the same.
I think we should all feel happy with this now, and
hope for
something better in 4.0.
Ajith Kallambella. M
Forte Systems Engineer,
International Business Corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Pereira [<a href=
"mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</a>]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 1998 9:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: DBSessions and Single-threading
Kamran,
That's not entirely correct. Partitions which access
multi-threaded
databases (like MS SQL Server on NT) do not block.
There was some
discussion about this over the User Group a while back
- with no real
conclusion, so perhaps Forte might want to step in and
clarify.
What I'm curious about is the outcome in a situation
where one DB
Session accesses SQL Server and another one talks to a
non
multi-threaded database within the same partition.
Thanks.
Eric Pereira
Forte Consultant
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Amin, Kamran" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], Peter Kelly
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: DBSessions and Single-threading
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 07:52:09 -0500
Reply-To: "Amin, Kamran" <[email protected]>
Peter,
If one of the service object is being used the that
partition gets
blocked until it has finished the request to the
dbsession. It will not
mater if the service objects are connected to different
database. Using
a
dbsession makes the partition single threaded and
that's why we use load
balancing. Please look at tech. note 10647 for more
info.
ka
Kamran Amin
Forte Technical Leader, Core Systems
(203)-459-7362 or 8-204-7362 - Trumbull
[email protected]
From: Peter Kelly[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 1998 6:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: DBSessions and Single-threading
Does a DBSession executing in a partition cause thatpartition to
become
single-threaded?
Suppose a partition has 2 Service Objects.
Each Service Object has its own unique DBSession.
While a method in one Service Object is using itsDBSession,
do all other threads in that partition halt and thenresume
when the work with the first DBSession is complete.
What if the two DBSessions are connected to differentdatabases,
does this change anything?
I heard rumours that Oracle on NT supportedmulti-tasking and blocking
would not occur. If blocking does occur, is it aForte or Oracle
limitation?
Any input/comments appreciated.
thanks,
Peter
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive
<URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
>>
>>
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive
<URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
>>
>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
>>
>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

Thanks Linh. Always good to here from you.
thanks
ka
Kamran Amin
Forte Technical Leader, Core Systems
(203)-459-7362 or 8-204-7362 - Trumbull
[email protected]
From: Linh Pham[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 1998 2:51 PM
To: Ajith Kallambella M; [email protected]; ForteUsers;
[email protected]
Subject: RE: DBSessions and Single-threading
all,
This information (technote draft # 11716) is to clear up the confusion
regarding
database access.
Note, Forte reserves the right to change this implementation in the
future.
Currently, there are two flavors of database access available with forte
(as of version 30j1):
1. single-threading access to all databases on all UNIX & VMS platforms
2. multithreading access to all supported database except Sybase on
intel/alpha-NT,
and to a certain extent, limited support with SQLServer (see more
details below)
1. single-threading access:
with this type of access, when the following code is executed
(SQL select ... on MyDBSession;), forte locks the partition and
all EXTERNAL requests will be queued. However, task switching inside
the partition continues until the called task enters the DBVendor's
API (as with any 3GL call). Prior to this moment, you can still have
multiple tasks running inside the partition. As the called task
enters the 3GL, it truly blocks a partition, ie. it's OUT there
talking to the database and not communicating with the
the forte's environment. If the query is long, the partition might not
be
able to acknowledge the environment manager's ping, and thus, will be
deemed NOT reachable, and a new partition will be started (see technote
11147). Another problem arises when you have multiple INTERNAL tasks
trying to perform database access concurrently on the same DBSession.
Since the behavior is unpredictable, we RECOMMEND that you only
have ONE task at any time accessing the DBSession inside a partition.
Please see also technote 7104 for more information regarding DBSession
sharing & blocking.
2. multi-threading access:
on NT, we have added code to allow multithreading access to most
supported
database. What does this mean?
a. when a task access the database, the partition will NOT be blocked.
b. you can have multiple DBSessions inside a partition and allow
concurrent access; however, we still RECOMMEND that you
only have ONE task accessing a DBSession at any one time.
Please consult a Forte consultant or a TSR in reference to technote
11151 (only available internally). Please do NOT call Forte Technical
Support for this technote.
As to SQLServer, the ODBC driver that you use to access the database
will
determine if it's is reentrant or not. There is also a known problem
with
the Microsoft ODBC driver which causes the cursor state to become
invalid when
multiple tasks accessing the same session. Due to these problems, forte
recommends that you single-threading access to SQLServer; otherwise
use at YOUR OWN RISK.
Hope this helps. IF you have questions regarding multithreading access
support
in the future, please contact a Forte Sales Rep or TSR.
linh ...
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Ajith Kallambella M
Sent: Friday, November 13, 1998 9:08 AM
To: [email protected]; ForteUsers; [email protected]
Subject: RE: DBSessions and Single-threading
Though, the DBSession partitions can reside on a
thread-safe
OS ( like NT ), the DBSession is still single threaded
and your
partition gets blocked for the duration of the DB
access. Same
is true, even if you have multi-threaded databases.
Forte has not changed DBSession to make it
multi-threaded.
Infact, given the current implementation, the only way
to simulate
concurrent database access is to replicate the
partition which
has DBSession object. The famous DBEntityManagerPattern
does essentially the same.
I think we should all feel happy with this now, and
hope for
something better in 4.0.
Ajith Kallambella. M
Forte Systems Engineer,
International Business Corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Pereira [<a href=
"mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]</a>]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 1998 9:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: DBSessions and Single-threading
Kamran,
That's not entirely correct. Partitions which access
multi-threaded
databases (like MS SQL Server on NT) do not block.
There was some
discussion about this over the User Group a while back
- with no real
conclusion, so perhaps Forte might want to step in and
clarify.
What I'm curious about is the outcome in a situation
where one DB
Session accesses SQL Server and another one talks to a
non
multi-threaded database within the same partition.
Thanks.
Eric Pereira
Forte Consultant
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Amin, Kamran" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], Peter Kelly
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: DBSessions and Single-threading
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 07:52:09 -0500
Reply-To: "Amin, Kamran" <[email protected]>
Peter,
If one of the service object is being used the that
partition gets
blocked until it has finished the request to the
dbsession. It will not
mater if the service objects are connected to different
database. Using
a
dbsession makes the partition single threaded and
that's why we use load
balancing. Please look at tech. note 10647 for more
info.
ka
Kamran Amin
Forte Technical Leader, Core Systems
(203)-459-7362 or 8-204-7362 - Trumbull
[email protected]
From: Peter Kelly[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 1998 6:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: DBSessions and Single-threading
Does a DBSession executing in a partition cause thatpartition to
become
single-threaded?
Suppose a partition has 2 Service Objects.
Each Service Object has its own unique DBSession.
While a method in one Service Object is using itsDBSession,
do all other threads in that partition halt and thenresume
when the work with the first DBSession is complete.
What if the two DBSessions are connected to differentdatabases,
does this change anything?
I heard rumours that Oracle on NT supportedmulti-tasking and blocking
would not occur. If blocking does occur, is it aForte or Oracle
limitation?
Any input/comments appreciated.
thanks,
Peter
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive
<URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
>>
>>
Get Your Private, Free Email at <a href=
"http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive
<URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
>>
>>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
>>
>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

Hard drive and critical error messages

Hello, I have suddenly rec'd numerous hard drive errors "hard drive doesn't respond to system commands" and critical error messages "damaged hard drive clusters detected. private data is at risk." "system has detected a problem with one or more installed IDE/SATA hard disks" along with other error messages. I have a toshiba satellite A505 over a year old and never had a problem until now. Was just surfing the web on a retail site and started getting all these pop-ups. desktop is missing most icons, favorite list gone. not computer savvy when it somes to figuring the error messages out. Any help appreciated. Should I take it in somewhere to get fixed? Please help.
Thank You.

not computer savvy when it somes to figuring the error messages out. ... Should I take it in somewhere to get fixed?
Yes, Katy. Be sure to back up all your important files. The machine you get back will most likely have all of your pictures, Xmas cards, favorites, contacts and so forth missing.
Locate a Toshiba Service Center
-Jerry

How to kill parent and child thread in sequnece

Hello freinds,
I have one class FirstClass which creates one thread Pserver and Pserver creates three threads then how to kill parent Pserver and child threads.........

define a method that requests that the parent thread terminate itself, and within the code called when the thread is shutting itself down, have it do something similar to its child threads: call methods that request they shutdown themselves.
One common way to do this is to interrupt the thread.

RAR: SoD Riskk and Critical Actions risks

Hi all,
I would like to get your input regarding different approaches followed in order to load in RAR SoD risk and critical actions risks.
1) Do you load all of them under the same rule set?
2) Do you think is convenient to load them under two different rule sets? One for SoD and the other for critical action?
My decision here since AC modules when calling to RAR are using the default SoD, would be to define everything under the same unique rule set. Agree on that?
Keep in mind the four GRC AC modules are implemented.
Thanks for all. Kind regards,
Imanol

Hi Imanol,
It depends on the client requirements. If client wants to see critical risks as well as SoD risks in CUP then same ruleset is the way to go. If client doesn't want to confuse approvers by showing critical risks then separate ruleset is the right way. At my current client, we have separate rulesets for SoD and Critical actions. We ask role owners to reaffirm all the role assignment which contains critical actions quarterly so we are covered from that angle.
Regards,
Alpesh

Enterprise User and Multi Thread Server

Hi,
We are going to build a system which uses a configuration:
10g2
Enterprise User
Multi Thread Server
Client apps accesses db over JDBC/SSL
Could some please share experience about issues regarding
using Enterprise User and Multi Thread Server ?
Is MTS transparant for Enterprise User authentication ?
Regards,
Cezary

If you build simpserv with -t, and set MIN and MAXDISPATCHTHREADS, you
should have an example of a multithreaded server.
Scott
Johan Philippe wrote:
>
We have been going to the documentation on multi-threading and contexting in servers
on Tuxedo 7.1.
And the impression so far is that apart from the function definitions there is
not much information around.
Didn't even find a simple example of a multi-threaded server in the Bea refs yet.
Does anyone know/have such an example?
And is anyone using multi-contexting in a server, because the limitation that
only server-dispatched
thread get a context puts quite a limitation on its usefullness.

PDF to InDesign and text threads

I have only a PDF of a 300+ page book. I tried using the PDF2ID plug-in to transfer to InDesign CS3, and it looks clean. However, each page comes in as a separate, unthreaded text block. Is there some way to thread all the pages at once?
The book is pretty much straight text.
Alternatively, are there other plug-ins that would do the job?
Thanks,
Gail

PDF to InDesign and text threads
Hi Sandee,
Thanks for your quick answer. I tried the trial version and couldn't get the text frames to link so I wrote to recosoft and got the very puzzling answer below. So I'm wondering how this works. Would you know or would you know the direct contact of the gentleman who spoke at the InDesign meeting in SF in January?
Thanks,
Gail
> I notice a couple of things, however.
> 1. Converting a whole chapter, I notice that the text boxes are no longer
> linked.
Text Frame linking is only performed within a page and that also PDF2ID has
to perform responsible Text Frame linking otherwise frames that shouldn't be
linked will.
A PDF file doesn't contain any kind of text frame linking information.
PDF2ID makes this on its own.
> I believe one of the new features is to thread text frames.

Why oc4j allows to use File IOs and manage thread in EJB?

I don't understand why Oc4j 9.0.2 allows to use File IO and create thread in EJBs? These things should be denied in its implemenation.

Any chance I can get this data?

Combining the fixed and cached thread pools

Is there a way to 'combine' the behavior of cached and fixed thread pools ? I have a requirement where
- at startup, I need to execute a fixed number of short-lived tasks at the background
- after startup, on demand, I need to run one short-lived task at a time
If I use a fixed thread pool for my startup processing, it creates the fixed number of threads to process the tasks. But subsequently, those many threads are not required since my task submission is going to be one at a time. The remaining (n-1) threads therefore are really sitting idle & useless.
If I use a cached thread pool, then I cannot constrain the number of threads to run at startup (since it creates one for each task). Though it ends up taking those threads out after they are idle for a fixed period. But I'm worried that it might create many threads and possibly slowing down the startup ?
Is there a way to create a pool with a fixed number of threads but 'remove' a set of threads when they are idle ?
TIA

v_bala wrote:
Thanks. The SynchronousQueue worked as expected. But I tried a LinkedBlockingQueue with size 1 hoping that would cause the second task submission to cause a new thread creation. It didn't. Instead it queues up the request (maybe the doc in ThreadPoolExecutor says that when it mentions "If corePoolSize or more threads are running, the Executor always prefers queuing a request rather than adding a new thread"). I suppose if I were to try another it would create another thread ? (I was testing with only two tasks - the first one ended up creating a thread for the task and the next got queued since the queue capacity is 1)yes, the TPE will not start adding threads until the queue starts rejecting them. kind of odd in my opinion, but that's how it works.
Btw, that was an interesting idea to add a task that scale the core pool number down ! Currently it comes back down to just the one thread (my core pool size is one) after the idle timeout but your idea may give me a slightly better response since it will scale down the core pool size quicker....I suppose if there was a task submission before that idle time there maybe a performance hit (but I don't anticipate that in my case )?actually, that won't scale things down any faster. changing the core pool size will not ditch the other threads immediately, they will still stick around until they idle timeout. changing the core pool size allows you to not worry about the queue implementation (the first solution). you can set the initial core pool size to your "max" size on startup, then drop it down for the normal processing, all the while using a linkedblockingqueue of unlimited size.

Similar to the question in cvs and eclipse thread

My Question is similar to the question in the cvs and eclipse thread, how can you know on the *.<file_extension>, v the date it was created? thank you very much to those who will reply

Hey wspearman,
Thanks for the question. Genius is still a great feature of iTunes 11, it may be that you simply need to turn it on. To do so, click Store > Turn On Genius
iTunes 11 for Windows: Use Genius Shuffle, Genius playlists, or Genius Mixes
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH12342
Note: Use Control-B on a Windows computer to show/hide the menubar
Thanks,
Matt M.

How to capture tablespace warning and critical messages

Hi,
Where in the database dictionary, the tablespace threshold percent (warning and critical) defined by the user is stored.
Requirement is to set threshold percent (warning and critical) in OEM and in a function (for User-Defined Metrics) or procedure (for scheduler) check for Tablespace PCT_FULL against the set threshold percent and display message accordingly.
Thanks & Regards,
Sanju.

Sounds like this is default behaviour of the metrics for tablespace full?
Here is the basic query for OEM metrics:
select
target_type,
target_name,
metric_column Metric,
decode(warning_threshold,' ',null, decode(warning_operator,'Equal To','=','Not Equal','!=','Greater Than','>','Less Than','<',warning_operator) || ' ' || warning_threshold) Warning,
decode(critical_threshold,' ', null, decode(critical_operator,'Equal To','Not Equal','!=','=','Greater Than','>','Less Than','<',critical_operator) || ' ' || critical_threshold) Critical
from mgmt$metric_collection
--where target_type = 'oracle_emd'
--and metric_column = 'HostInfovszGrowth'
--and warning_threshold != '20'
--where target_type = 'host'
where-- metric_column like 'tnsPing'
-- (warning_threshold != '80' and critical_threshold != '95')
--and
target_type = 'oracle_database'
--and target_type = 'host'
--and
--target_type = 'oracle_listener'
--target_type = 'oracle_emd'
--and metric_column like 'generic%'
--and warning_threshold like '%ORA%'
and target_name = 'XXXSOMEHOSTNAMExxxx'
and metric_column = 'pctUsed'
order by 1,3,2

Logging just exceptions and 'critical' TopLink info to the log

I'm trying to just log exceptions and other 'critical' info that occur within TopLink to the log rather than getting lots of SQL statements, unit of work info etc.
I'm running TopLink 9.0.3.5 in WebLogic Server 7.0 (SP4) using container managed persistence for Entity Beans.
If I startup WebLogic with the toplink.log.level=INFO option then I get SQL statements, unit of work info, JTS registration info as well as any exceptions that are logged.
If I leave the logging like this my WebLogic log will likely be huge and performance degraded from writing a lot of info that will never be used.
If I startup WebLogic with the toplink.log.level=NONE option then I don't get any log statements, not even exception info (although obviously clients still get the exception stack). I need to get the exceptions and 'critical' TopLink info in the WebLogic log because I cannot rely on getting the information from client logs.
In the TopLink for WebLogic 2.5.1 product the default logging behaviour was to log only exceptions and other 'critical' info to the log.
Is there a way to configure TopLink 9.0.3 so that only exceptions and any other 'critical' TopLink information is written to the log (and SQL statements, unit of work info and JTS registration info is not written).
Thanks.

You don't mention which version of 10g you have but there is a bug in all versions 10.1.2.0.2 and newer in that usernames are no longer being inserted in the Apache log files when portal pages are viewed. It was somewhat hit or miss before, but good enough to get a feeling of what was being used Now, it does not even provide that. Bug number reference from Metalink is 5638057. It is shown as "Closed -- not feasible to fix", but will be addressed in 11.0
I am experimenting with getting this data a couple of ways. One, if you happen to use WebTrends, you can manually set the authenticated users field to whatever you'd like so I am using the API's to retrieve the username and the user company (organization) and concatenating them together.
The other option I am considering is a procedure call in the footer of each page that automatically updates a new table with the session id, username, page, timestamp, and whatever other information you may want each time the page is visited. This table can then be dumped to a data file if desired or left in the database and analyzed using a tool like Discoverer.
Rgds/Mark M.

Scritical scenarious and critical threads

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for