SD Over to Cost structures

Hi guys,
Please any one can send me the SD (Over to Cost) structures.

Hi
Go to the transaction MC23 in R/3 and chekc the suitable structure for your requirement
The strcutures from S001 to S500 are standard structures and you can create if nothing fulfills to your requirment
Is this what you want? or pls elaborate what you want
Regards
N Ganesh

Similar Messages

Over head cost controlling

Hi All
I am using Over head cost controlling by order, How does the values flow from product costing to COPA...mainly variances?

Hi,
If you are talking about cost object controlling by Order,product costing variances
Here you go
Variance Calculation
As long the production order is not fully delivered or flagged Technical Complete the remaining order balance is treated as WIP. Otherwise the order balance shows up in variance calculation.
If a lot-based product-controlling WIP, is valuated at actual costs. The WIP is calculated as the difference between the debit and credit of an order as long as the order does not have the status DLV (delivered).
In lot-based product controlling the variances are not calculated until the order has the status DLV (finally delivered) or TECO (technically completed). This means that at the time the order has reached this status, the system no longer interprets the difference between the debit and the credit as work in process but as a variance. In lot-based product controlling orders never have work in process and variances at the same time.
Variance calculation compares the actual costs incurred for the production/process order with the target costs according to the standard cost estimate for the finished material, and assigns the individual variances to variance categories. The target costs are calculated using the quantity delivered for the order.
In this way you can find out which variances occurred between the value of the delivery and the actual costs and you can find the reason for the posting to the price difference account for materials with standard price control.
Variances from production (target version 1)
Variance calculation compares the actual costs incurred for the production order with the target costs for the production order and assigns the individual variances to variance categories. The target costs are calculated using the quantity delivered for the order.
This enables variance calculation to find out which variances occurred between the time the production order was created and the end of the production process.
Variances from planning (target version 2):
Variance calculation compares the planned costs for the production order with the target costs according to the standard cost estimate for the finished material, and assigns the individual variances to variance categories. The target costs are calculated using the quantity delivered for the order.
This enables variance calculation to find out which variance occurred between the time the standard cost estimate was created and the time the production order was created.
Variance categories:
The system assigns every variance to a variance category. The variance category indicates the cause of the variance (such as price change, lot-size variance). Variances are updated to the information system and passed on to Profitability Analysis according to variance category.
You differentiate between variance categories on the input side and on the output side:
u2022 Variances that occur because of goods issues, internal activity allocations, overhead and G/L account postings are displayed on the input side. Price variances, quantity variances, resource-usage variances and input variances are displayed on the input side.
u2022 Variances that occur because too little or too much of the planned order quantity were delivered, or because the delivered quantity was valuated differently are displayed on the output side.
Variances on the output side occur when you deliver using a price that differs from that found by dividing the target costs and the delivered quantity. If you deliver using the standard price, a variance can occur when the order lot size differs from the costing lot size. This is displayed as a lot-size variance.
For config
3.1.4.2 Variances & Settlement
Variance Calculation determines differences between the actual costs incurred on a production order and the standard costs of the material produced. Variances are calculated not at once, but for different variance categories. The variances computed are then transferred to CO-PA.
3.1.4.2.1 Define Default Variance Keys for Plants
Use
The Variance Key is part of the order header and controls variance calculation. The system selects the value set by this step as default value when a material master is created. From the material master the variance key then is transferred to the order when an order for the material is created.
Procedure
1. Access the activity using one of the following navigation options:
Transaction Code OKVW
IMG Menu Controlling  Product Cost Controlling  Cost Object Controlling  Product Cost by Order  Period End Closing  Variance Calculation -> Define Default Variance Keys for Plants
2. Make the following entries:
Plant Variance Key
BP01 000001
BP02 000001
BP03 000001
BP0X 000001
3.1.4.2.2 Define Target Cost Versions
Use
The target cost version controls various parameters related to calculation of target costs in variance calculation. In variance calculation, target costs are needed as a comparison to the actual costs incurred.
Procedure
1. Access the activity using one of the following navigation options:
Transaction Code OKV6
IMG Menu Controlling Product Cost Controlling  Cost Object Controlling  Product Cost by Order  Period End Closing  Variance Calculation  Define Target Cost Versions
2. Choose New entries and enter the following values or copy from default settings of CoArea 0001 to BP01:
CoArea TgtCostVsn Text Variance Variant Control Cost Target Cost
BP01 0 Target Costs for Total Variances 001 Actual Costs Current Std cost Est
BP01 1 Target costs for production variances 001 Actual Costs Plan Costs / Preliminary Cost Estimate
BP01 2 Target costs for planning variances 001 Plan Costs Current Std cost Est
3.1.4.2.3 Create Settlement Profile
Use
The settlement profile controls various parameters related to settlement.
Prerequisites
Allocation Structure
Procedure
1. Access the activity using one of the following navigation options:
Transaction Code SPRO
IMG Menu Controlling  Product Cost Controlling  Cost Object Controlling  Product Cost by Order  Period-End Closing  Settlement  Create Settlement Profile
2. Choose New Entries and enter header data. Then for each new entry choose Details and enter remaining data.
3. Overview of data records:
Profile Text
YGPI00 BP Process Order w/o CO-PA
YGPP00 BP Production Order w/o CO-PA
YGPI00 YGPP00
Actual costs/costs of sales
To be settled in full X X
Can be settled
Not for settlement
Default Values
Allocation Structure A1 A1
Source Structure
PA Transfer Struct.
Default object Type
Indicators
100% Validation X X
%-Settlement X X
Equivalence Nou2019s X X
Amount Settlement
Var. to co. bsd. PA
Valid receivers
G/L account N N
Cost center O O
Order O O
WBS Element O O
Fixed asset N N
Material O O
Network N N
Profit. Segment N N
Sales order O O
Cost objects O O
Order item O O
Business proc. N N
Real est. object N N
Other parameters
Document type SA SA
Max.no.dist.rls 3 3
Residence time 3 3
You have to assign Variance Key in material master for semi-finished and Finished goods in costing 1 tab also.
To Execute
KKS1-Collective Variance calculation
KKS2-Individual Variance calculation
CO88-Collective settlement
KO88-Individual settlement
if you need anything more,let me know.
Thanks,
Rau

Components in the lowest level of costing structure in SO

Hi,
Could you please let me know is any function module to get Components in the lowest level of costing structure in Sales order.
Thanks,
Harinath

Yes, you can manipulate your components any way you like. Becareful about the layout manager though as it likes to handle the positioning and sizing, so there is an intimate relationship there.
Also call validate() on the container after you make your changes.

CK13N costing structure download

Hi,
After entering material , plant , costing variant, costing version and valid on ( date ) in ck13n tcode. , we will get costing structure on the left side of the screen . I want to download these costing structure to "excel" or some other format.
help suggest me how to download costing structure detils.
Thanks & regards,
Hari priya.

Hi Haripriya,
We dont have that option in this transaction.
Why dont you try reporting through Trans:S_ALR_87013032
then press Shift+F6.The same structure will be available for download.Menu->System-List->Save->Local File.
Got One more option:
From the same Trans CK13N
Click the Print Option
In Windows Printer -> select->Microsoft Off Document Image writer
then click OK
Go to Trans SP01 - Spool
You can print the structure from there.
Revert back if you need more clarifications.
Regards
Andrew
Edited by: Andrew J on May 19, 2009 4:19 PM

Over Head Costs

Hi
What are the various ways in which Over Head Costs can be allocated?
Regards
Kapil Singhvi

Costs can be allocated from sender to receiver in the following methods:
Distribution
Periodic Reposting
Assessment
DISTRIBUTION
===========
Distribution was created for transfer primary costs from a sender cost center to receiving controlling objects. During distribution, only cost centers or business process can be used as sender.
A distribution receiver can be a cost center, WBS element, internal order, cost object, or a business process. You can restrict the number of receiver categories in customizing.
Primary Postings (such as, energy costs) are collected on a cost center, and allocated at the end of the period by means of the user-defined key.
You can only distribute primary costs. During this process, the original cost element remains the same.
Line items are posted for the sender as well as for the receiver, enabling the allocation to be recorded exactly.
You can reverse distributions as often as required.
You use the Cycle-Segment method to define sender-receiver relationships.
PERIODIC REPOSTING
=================
Differences between periodic reposting and distribution are due to information content and performance.
For periodic reposting, no separate credit record is written on the sender for the cost element in the summary report. Instead, the totals record for the cost element is reduced on the debit side, which means that the original debit amount can no longer be checked there (u201Cunclean creditu201D). However, during distribution, the system writes a totals record for the credit (u201Cclean creditu201D). The information on the receiver is the same for periodic reposting and distribution (u201Cclean debitu201D).
Compared with periodic reposting, during distribution, the system also updates the partner in the totals record for the sender. This means that the partner can be displayed in the information system on the totals record level.
As fewer totals records are written during periodic reposting, performance is better than during distribution.
ASSESSMENT
===========
Assessment was created to transfer primary and secondary costs from a sender cost center to receiving controlling objects. During assessment, cost center or business processes can be used as senders.
The receivers for an assessment can be a cost center, WBS element, internal order, cost object, or a business process. You can restrict the number of receiver categories in customizing.
Primary and secondary posting are allocated at the end of the period by the user-defined key.
During assessment, the original cost elements are summarized into assessment cost elements (secondary cost element category = 42). As the system writes fewer total records, the assessment has a better performance than periodic reposting and distribution.
The system does not display the original cost elements in the receivers. Therefore, assessment is useful if the cost drilldown for the receiver is not important.
Similar to distribution, the partner is updated in the totals record during distribution
You can reverse assessments as often as required.
You use the Cycle-Segment method to define sender-receiver relationships.
Regards,
Ravi

I have an iMac with a black / blank screen on startup. Been to Apple Genius. They have no idea and wish to replace logic board, screen ,cable - over $1300 cost - ouch. Any ideas

I have an iMac with a black / blank screen on startup. Been to Apple Genius (Aus, Bondi). They have no idea and wish to replace logic board, screen ,cable - over $1300 cost - ouch. Any ideas ? Thanks

Buy a new iMac, the base 21.5" models are only $1,199.00
Apple iMac Desktop Computer - Buy iMac, the Ultimate All-in-One - Apple Store (U.S.)

Report to display Mat Cost Planned Labour Cost and Over head cost

Hi Abapers,
Greetings of the day..
I need a Report that Display Material Cost , Planned Labour Cost,Actual Labour Cost and Over head value
where do i start from and what are the tables involving in this report..
if already done this A code snippet is more helpful...
Thanks In Advance...
Thanks & Regards
Sathish

Assuming you are talking about Maintenance Order.
Use table: PMCO.
Here the line with field VORGA having value KPPS gives the Planned Costs of the Order in the field WRT01.
Similarly, the line with field VORGA having value RKL gives the Actual Costs of the Order in the field WRT01.
Also have a look at Tcode KKBC_ORD.
Jogeswara Rao K

Forecast for planning over the Cost element/Cost center with KP06

Hi all
I'm searching a idea: one of our chief controller need to insert a "forecast" of budget inserted over the various cost elements/cost centers using the transaction KP06. THe problem is that he don't want lost the budget because he can need the reload the previous budget data during the year if the actual situation change. Obvisiously the insertion of the forecast overwrite the budget data over the version 0. This forces us to download over a file the budget and archive it, and reload it eventually. But this solution, a part the programming effort, don't permit to have both the data at the same time in the system. Exist a pratical customizing solution in CO for manage a "forecast"? Our release is 46c.
thanks
Davide

Thanks Pascal.
Some questions (i dont' have a CO background ):
>execute charge transferts and plan distribution in the new >version
Can you explicate me these concepts (or the transaction used for make this, probably I know this but in italian the name is different)? The KP47 copy the value over the single cost element or only the total of cost center?
>KP98 is the transaction to copy postings from version 0 to >another version. In this case version 0 is the template.
Are you sure? The KP98 have the description "Copy by actual version to planned version", the KP97 "copy from planned to planned"
thanks in advance
Davide

Get CK11N cost structure value is incomplete

Dear friends,
I use BAPI_COSTESTIMATE_GETEXPLOSION, BAPI_COSTESTIMATE_GETDETAIL, BAPI_COSTESTIMATE_ITEMIZATION to get CK11N data; I found the data is incomplete.
The Reason is BOM structure, BOM is recursive, like this:
Level1 FERT 1
Level2 HALB1 RAW1
Level3 HALB12 RAW2
Level4 HALB123 HALB12 (here set recursive)
BAPI_COSTESTIMATE_GETEXPLOSION can explosion the Level4 HALB123,but canu2019t explosion level4 HALB12,then I also use HALB12 run BAPI again,
The data is not equal CK13N .and I checked BOM with PP consultant, He said, BOM is correct.
How Can I get the recursive BOM cost value?
Thx
Edited by: sun on Nov 25, 2011 2:42 AM

Activate Cost component structure using Tcode OKTZ.

KSV5 : cycle over distributed cost.

HI, team!
Please, I'd need your help, I monthly run KSv5, and normally it has any problem, but this may, the cycle over distributed the cost (around 1000%). I don't understand why because, nothing has changed. I'm not using sKf, I'm using Actual costs
Please, somebody can help me? thanks a lot and regards,
Lorena

Hi Lorena,
assuming your distribution cycle is maintained properly use the information of SAPNET note 416507 (Allocation: Trouble shooting guide) to check whats going on. But thats a really technical approach and I doubt thats its an technical issue...
The other approach is to (test) distribute values only for a view segements (block the others) to find out which segment(s) cause the problem. You can do this by reversing the values if they are already posted and then step-by-step blocking segments and "test" distribute the others. See the sender/receiver values in test mode and identify the wrong ones.
BR Christian

Over head Costs splitting equally

Dear All,
I have created 8 activity types,but I want to split the Ovrehead Costs among 3 activity types only,but the system is splirring the costs on all the 8 activity types.
In my splitting structure,I have given activity type group by assigning the 3 activity types for which splitting is to be done.
Can sombody throw any light on this issue.
Regards
SU

hi
IN OKES, please create an assignment line, select the assignment line for the particular splitting structure. create activity type group for which the costs to be splitted and update them in selction for assignments.
in the activity group selct only those three activity types.
with out creating the splitting structure also the costs will be split that is they will be split equally. but where as if you properly assign it to the cost center then only the cost will be split as u like
krishna

How to view the Billing data,direct postings from FI and Over head costs

Dear All,
I have created a PA report by Report Painter and when I execute the report by KE30,I could able see the report for billing data by selecting the 'F' and when I want to see the direct postings from FI,I have to come back to initial screen ,then select 'B' and similarly select 'D' for overhead costs.
Can I see all data (i.e billing,postings from FI & overhead costs ) in a single report,without selecting the Record Type.
Regards
Su

Hi,
In KE35 (Form),I have defined the columns (for actuals and plan) and rows (for value fields only) and in KE32 (Report),I have defined the characteristics and variables and when I defining the VARIABLES ,I have selected 'Record Type' as one of the variable.
As you said that I have tried to remove the Record Type as a variable,but i could not remove it . Please suggest me as how to remove it and take it as a Characteristic.
Regards
Subbu

Does using the skype app (from my iphone to a computer)over 3G cost me money, or is it free like Wifi?

I was at a family dinner last night and included my college daughter at the table via Skype on my iphone. She was on her laptop. After about 30 minutes, I remembered that my mother-in-law does not do technology, and has no internet, so I was on 3G, and not Wifi. I have AT&T. Does anyone know offhand what fees (if any) are involved? I don't have unlimited data, although I never come near the alloted amount of data usage I am allowed per month. Skype has always been free when I've used it over Wifi. Am I just paying for data usage, or am I going to get charged for making some kind of call? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks.

If you don't have unlimited data, then you could incur overage charges for Data use. How much will depend on what data plan you have. Check your AT&T account at att.com for details or contact customer service.

Over head cost

Hi,
In the work order we need to calculate the overheads actual cost also apart from the planned cost, estimated cost. also let me know if we have to do any cofigurational changes for this to be done?
Thanks
Vishnu Kumar

Hi,
planned cost will be calculated automatically by the system
Estimated cost has to be entered manually i.e before releasing
the order.
Actual Cost also will be calculated manually
To calculate overhead cost costing sheet has to be entered in the actual costing variant.
Try the steps mentioned below:
Plant maintenance and customer service>Maintenance and service processing->Maintenance and service orders>Functions and setting for order types>Costing Data for Maintenance and service orders-->Maintain Costing Variants.
Thanks
Arun Vijay D

Dilema over Plant / Organization Structure

Hi,
We are a Service Provider Company based in Orissa.
We receive Contracts from other Companies & execute them across India (different Project Sites). We have different Project Site across India.
In SAP, do we need to create all the Project Locations as PLANT.
Or, we can simply create a SINGLE PLANT & treat all the Project Sites Storage Locations.
As of now I have treated all the Site Locations as Plant.
For example, in Jharkhand, we have got two offices, one in Ranchi & another in Dhanbad. The Ranchi Site is taking care of three different projects running near by & Dhanbad Site is taking care of two different rojects. We have created both Ranchi & Dhanbad as Plants.
But while discussing the Organization Structure with our seniors, some one suggested that there is no need to create Project Sites a Plant; the same can be managed using Storage Locations only. They have proposed to create Jharkhand as a Plant; Ranchi & Dhanbad as Storage Locations. The problem with me is that there are different people handling purchase & stock both in Ranchi & Dhanbad.
Also there is some Stock Transfer from Ranchi to some other States (for example, Guwahati & Silchar in Assam).
If we create Jharkhand & Assam as Plants and Ranchi ,Dhanbad, Guwahati & Silchar as Storage Locations, will be logically true.
I am in a dilema as I am not aware of how the Project Systems people map the Plants in SAP. Here in our case, the Project Systems guy is thinking of STATE as Plants while I personally think that Office Locations from where purchase & stock keeing is done as Plants.
I am confused about the process for transfering Materials among the locations (withinn and outside State)
Pls. guide.
Regards
Aditi..

Discuss with your client , How they are handling the procurement in Legacy..
IF you they are using de-centralized Procurement then you need to define the respective procurement centres as Plants.. (Which will allow you to address the taxes & Valuation of Material )
If they are using the sites only for monitoring the stocks & goods movements, then you need to define them as Sto Locations..
It all depends upon the inputs from the client & the Legacy business scenario..
Prepare a Presentation detailings the advantages & dis-advantages of defining as a Plant or Sto location..
First Discuss the same with your colleagues and then with the client..

SD Over to Cost structures

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for