Search for SCN Bug Reporting is broken

Hi
See my comments in the pic below. The bug search is broken.
I can enter a search term, and even the URL gets updated.
But the results are not refreshed. SAP IT has given me a new IE10 today (see further below).
can this be checked please.
( i have seen there are a bunch of other reports on broken searches, they seemed to be about different issues imo )
Pieter

I've checked in IE11. Its working fine for me.
Searching for "Link is"
Then I have changed the text as "Render"

Similar Messages

Adobe bug report system broken

I've been having issues with Flash Pro CS6 that are getting progressively worse. I filed a few bug reports using their Bug Report form here: https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
I just noticed today that I had some delivery failure notifications for those bug reports in my spam box.
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
[email protected]
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
The form submits to a nonexistent email address. This is basically Adobe giving everyone the finger. Great.

Suhas,
It is not fixed. It is not even changed:
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
[email protected]
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.

Compilations - Search for Artist (Bug?)

Hi!
When I use the compilations menu, it's not possible to search for a compilation track's artist name. I guess the reason is that the artist name is hidden from the artist menu (which is good), but IMHO it should still be searchable. When I turn the compilations menu off, I'm able to find the track by searching for the artist.
Best regards, Jens.

I think it's meant to be like that. see the info in the wikipedia change log
Thanks, but I don't think it's working right. The change log says:
"Search now has Search Bar for refining search results ... Search all artists, albums..."
If you type in "House of Love", after the search results appear, you get the Search Bar. Click "Artist" and there's no semblence to the results and what was searched. In other words, it doesn't seem to "refine search results."
Don't you believe this is a bug? If I type "House of Love", search, click "Artist", and get "Etta James" does that sounds like a "refined search?" What would you expect to get if you search for Etta James and click "Artist"? (sorry, being sarcastic).
I'm curious how to report this to Apple.
Thanks,
Mark

Searching for Access Point Report by SSID on the WCS

Hello,
im searching for an option to make a Report on the WCS (Software Version 6.0.170.0 ) to see all SSIDs that are ratiated in detail by the Access Points.
I mean something like this: (example)
AP 1   - SSID 1 and SSID 2
AP2   -   SSID 1
AP3   -   SSID 3 and SSID2
Or is they any other alternativ to see that on the WCS or WLC?
Thank You

Hi,
The "AP SUMMARY" report will provide you the AP group to which the AP is mapped to.. here by we can come to know what all WLANs are getting broadcasted by the AP..
REPORTS LAUNCH PAD >> DEVICES >> AP SUMMARY >> NEW.
Lemme know if this answered ur question and please dont forget to rate the suefull posts!!
Regards
Surendra

How to remember what I search for in Interactive Report's search field

Hi.
I made Cro-Eng dictionary using Interactive Report by joining two table columns of Croatian and English word. Now I want to remember every word that I write in the search field of Interactive Report by filling the table SEARCHEDWORDS which has two columns WORD and DATE, so that I can see all the searches that were made and the date they were made. Is it possible? Do I need triggers for that, or do I do it through processes in edit page of Interactive report? something like INSERT INTO SEARCHEDWORDS (WORD, DATE)
VALUES (?SOMETHING?, SYSDATE);

Hi Tihomir,
The last step is Javascript so you'll need to create an HTML region and wrap the code in <script> tags. The Javascript basically overwrites the default actions to refresh the IR report. Instead it says to call a custom function which first logs the search request then makes a request to refresh the IR region.
jQuery is used to help manipulate these links. jQuery is a javascript library. You can read more about it at jquery.com. To see more examples, Insum has an excellent jQuery for APEX page: http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=987654321:home:0
If you have multiple IR pages then you can include the code on Page 0 or on each of those pages. Since you're trying to log information for several different IR you may want to add some extra columns to your log table to include which IR the searches belong to. You'll also need to update your application process and (depending on your requirements) some of the javascript code.
Martin
[http://apex-smb.blogspot.com/]

What is the correct channel for submitting bug reports on nightly builds?

I am using the nightly build channel of Firefox. I would love to help with development by sharing my experiences. Unfortunately, I can't figure out where I'm supposed to report bugs. The "Firefox made me sad" form is completely worthless because of the character limit. Is there something else, that actually gives me room to explain the problem?

You can also discuss problems with Firefox 13 Nightly builds at the MozillaZine Builds forum.
You need to register on the mozillaZine forum site in order to post at that forum.<br />
See http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=23

Bug report: ube_ipa: internal error when compiling with -xO5

When compiling imlib2-1.1.2, one source file causes compilation to fail with the following error message:
ube_ipa: internal error
cc: ube_ipa failed for loader_tiff.c
The command which fails is (probably wrapped):
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I.. -I../src -I../loaders -I../libltdl -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/openwin/include -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/include -g -fast -xarch=386 -xstrconst -v -xildoff -xO5 -c loader_tiff.c -KPIC -DPIC -o .libs/loader_tiff.o
Changing -xO5 to -xO4 works around the problem. The source file in question is imlib2-1.1.2/loaders/loader_tiff.c
Patch 112756-10 has been applied, and doesn't correct the problem. GCC doesn't have any problem compiling the file.
A quick note to any Sun employees reading this: it took me 45 minutes to find somewhere to submit this bug report. Searching sun.com for "submit bug report" turned up many forum postings where people asked "Where do I submit bug reports?", a bug report form for Sun One Java Studio, and not much else. It might be in your interest to make submitting bugs easier.

Internal errors, such as the one you encountered, are generally considered compiler bugs. They indicate that the compiler reached an unexpected state and therefore bailed out. I opened bug 20703141: internal error: pic_relocs(): hh reltype? to investigate. I see the same error message emitted by the current Studio development release; I will update this thread if I find a work-around.
Thanks,
Mark

Bug report status

Hi, I have previously highlighted an issue with the Xperia C3 D2533 running 5.0, where the back camera is producing low quality images.This is from the Galaxy Note 1 While this is from the Xperia C3 What is appaling is if you zoom in, the N7000 has more detail than the C3, whereby the C3 just paints over the colours unscrupulously giving jagged edges obvious from the USB. I have sent an email to support and received a reply saying it has been forwarded to the developers about two weeks ago. I have heard that the Lollipop 5.1 is coming out in July and am curious as to whether the camera issue has been confirmed as a bug by the developers and are currently looking into it, hopefully rolling out the update with the fix as well. Edit: I have done a software reset and a repair via PC Companion using the steps recommended. The PC Companion told me there are no available updates or softwares for this phone. Therefore to sum it up, what I would like to know is a confirmation on the status of this report among the devs and whomever it may concern in the troubleshooting phase.

Seems like a search of the bug report submission
queue would be useful.Use this:
http://developers.sun.com/contact/feedback.jsp?referer=http://forum.java.sun.com&category=sdn&mailsubject=Forums%20or%20Community
It's as pointless as any other measure in getting Sun to do what you want. ;)

Sending a bug report on the OS and a sleep mode problem.

I find the bug button in Safari really convenient for sending Apple bug reports. And when other applications crash, you usually get an error dialog with a button to send a bug report. But sometimes problems arise that require reporting, but which don't fall in either of these categories. It would be very handy to have a bug "button" for the OS, or perhaps just a menu selection in the Finder menu bar that invokes a bug report dialog box. I know you can dig around and find the URL for Apple's bug report web page, but I am always forgetting it -- I suppose I could just bookmark it, but then I'd just have to dig around in all the bookmarks to find it. Better would be a utility built-in to the OS for sending bug reports (like Safari's). It could also automatically transfer necessary info about the OS rev and such.
The problem I had was this. I have a script that puts my iMac to sleep. I put the script alias on the task bar and a single click puts the computer to sleep (easier than using the menu). Unfortunately, I sometimes click it by mistake when I am trying to click an adjacent icon in the task bar, and the Mac starts going through its cycle to enter sleep mode and is impervious to anything I do to try and cancel it. I tried pressing the space bar continuously to prevent it from going to sleep, but that did not work. Worse, when it went to sleep and I woke it up again, the task bar would not appear, clicking on app windows did not activate them, Finder menus could not be selected, etc. The cursor would move, but I could not do anything else. (I wish now I had noted if the clock in the menu bar was still advancing, but I didn't think to do that.) I powered down the iMac from the power key and rebooted. Things are working fine now.
I wanted to send a bug report on this, but realized that unlike Safari, there was no button or menu selection for doing that. So here I am.
Any suggestions are welcome.
TIA,
Drake

[email protected]
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Bug Report: Revert Component to Artwork

On my machine, I have a test file where I have turned some artwork into a Scroll Panel. After realizing that the Scroll Panel was the wrong component, I selected it, right clicked it, and chose "Revert Component to Artwork".
Once this was done, my project would not display when testing. In Firefox, I would just get a white page.
This was repeatable on my machine using anything that I converted to a Scroll Panel and then back to artwork.
Hope this helps.
Graham

Hi Graham,
Thanks for the bug report. Would you be able to send us an FXP that exhibits this problem? I haven't been able to reproduce it on my machine so far.
Thanks again!

How to find out bug report status or disposition?

Is there someone to contact; or, is there a way to find out the disposition of a bug report which has possibly not been assigned a number yet, or whose subject has been changed (i.e. can't be found in a search) ?
About 3 months ago I submitted a report with the subject, "TrueTypeFont.open() ..." related to Linux JDK 1.5.0 runtime.
Thanks,
Dick

Seems like a search of the bug report submission
queue would be useful.Use this:
http://developers.sun.com/contact/feedback.jsp?referer=http://forum.java.sun.com&category=sdn&mailsubject=Forums%20or%20Community
It's as pointless as any other measure in getting Sun to do what you want. ;)

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

Bug report - nbsp in search results

See http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=24317:86
Out of the box report on EMP with query as
select * from emp
where (:P86_SEARCH is null or lower(empno||ename||job) like '%'||:P86_SEARCH||'%')
order by empnoand Highlight Search enabled on EMPNO, ENAME and JOB columns for &P86_SEARCH. Report Attributes "Show Nulls as" is set to blank (per documentation it should default to (null) but that doesn't seem to be happening either)
Runs fine without any search, see http://screencast.com/t/eF1xXtjQ5
But when you enter a 1-letter search for any of the letters N, B, S or P, the HTML code & nbsp; magically appears in the search results with the search letter highlighted. See http://screencast.com/t/lYXnBnb5u

Hi Vikas,
Thank you for reporting this issue. I easily reproduced this.
I have filed this as Bug 12581907 to be fixed for Application Express 4.1.
Thanks again.
Joel

Bug report - Application Search

Apex 4.1
See http://screencast.com/t/wc8cyKKV5Pvh
Searching for a string like *1e6* in the Search box is interpreted as a number (in scientific notation) and it tries to pull up page no 1000000

Hi Scott,
thanks for reporting. I have filed bug# 16599622
Regards
Patrick
Member of the APEX development team
My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
APEX Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

Bug in Notes ? Search for "Apple" highlights almost all Notes.

Hi,
I just discovered that entering the keyword "apple" in the search bar of notes shows me that almost all my notes contain it.
Even though they don't. I checked it many times.
Short notes with only 5 words which cleary dont have the word "apple" are shown for example.
By deleting the notes and rewriting it ( whith "copy&paste" ) the dissappear from the search results.
Is it just me ? I can't imagine this being a bug.
Any Ideas ? Thanks in advance.

I am not a Notes user even though I have Mountain Lion and can tell you that what you describe is a very strange bug.
Things to try:
Close Notes application and then reopen the Application and try to find if the error is reproducible.
If the issue persits, reboot your Mac.
File a bug report in the OS X Feedback Page or by creating an Apple Developer Account (Don't worry it's free).
Hope this helps!

Search for SCN Bug Reporting is broken

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for