Search with LOV

i want to execute a search from a LOV. this search should be done by key or by name. the restriction that i found is that my LOV perform a search only by the first column.(in this way only by key or only by name).
there is any solution to this pb.
thanks in advance.

You can assign at runtime another record group to the LOV using SET_LOV_PROPERTY.
You can choose which record group to use depending on the the type of search required.
Regards
Rose

Similar Messages

How to do search with LOV+oracle adf

Hi,
I m using jdeveloper 11g with oracle adf .As i know that input text with LOV has default search facility. Plz tell me how to make search by using LOV .so that when i click on input text with LOV data should come in form.

hi
check this
http://andrejusb.blogspot.in/2008/02/list-of-values-component-in-search-and.html
Regards

Input Text with LOV in table, the search list will be limited with 25 row?

Hi, experts
I got a strange problem with JDev 11.1.1.5.0, I created Input Text with LOV in Data View for one attribute with default setting, the LOV worked fine when I drop the DC with 'ADF form'; but when I drop it with ADF Table, the search function will just show 25 rows, I can see it try to fetch data when scroll down just like form, but then nothing happened, only the first 25 rows will be show without any error log.
Any special configuration needed for LOV in table? or a bug in LOV?
many thanks.

You can change the range size on the VO which you use for the LOV. If you only want to change it for the VO the lov uses, select the VO in question in the application module data model and clic edit. There you enter -1 fro raneg size.
If you want to change it globaly for this VO you open the VO and select the Tuning section and check 'all at once' which should get you all rows. Be careful that the VO don't return too much rows. A LOV wiht more then 50 rows is too big. In this case you may choose an other component.
Timo

Personalized Simple Search with new messageLovInput - Search does not work

I have currently set an Message LOV Input into a Simple Search Panel for IcxPorRcvSrchPG.
I have got the LOV bringing back the correct values, but when I hit the GO button the Search does not work.
Can someome please help me on how I am able to get the search working in the Simple Search Panel.
Details of VO's are as follows:
xxReceiveItemsDueVO (extended from ReceiveItemsDueVO)
xxReceiveMyItemsVO (extended from ReceiveMyItemsVO )
xxReceivePurchaseItemsVO (extended from ReceivePurchaseItemsVO)
xxReceiveReqItemsVO (extended from ReceiveReqItemsVO)
Extended Attribute I am looking to search with is xxWono.
Current search items are working 100% with extended VO's, but when I try and search with new item, I am having no luck. The search is acting as though the new item has not even been created.
Additional Lov Details are as follows:
Level: Site
Item Style: Message Lov Input
ID: xxWONumSearch
Data Type: VARCHAR2
External LOV: /oracle/apps/icx/lov/webui/WorkOrderLovRN
Prompt: Work Order Number
Search Allowed: False
Search Criteria: False
Lov Map
ID: xxWipEntityName
Criteria Item: xxWONumSearch
LOV Region: WipEntityName
Programmatic Query: False
Required: False
Return Item: xxWONumSearch
Framework version: 11.5.10.6RUP
Is there a way of doing this through Personalization?
With the version of framework I am not able to add a simpleSearchMapping through Personalization.
Can someone please advise?
Thanks
Lee

When I generate and then view the help, it looks perfect! I changed the name of the project folder since the information is proprietary. I have several pictures including the parent folder and the only 3 folders that are generated. I cannot find the Webhelp output folder. I think this is what you need to see.

ComboBox with Lovs on Jdev 11g r2

I'm facing this Error on JSF on Jdeveloper 11g r2, Windows7.
I'm Using a ComboBox with Lovs on af:table.
I'm getting this Error below when I invoke the (Search) option... to see the popup list.
it works fine in every other case, if I select from the small list works ok, enter the text works ok. everything but the search option.
thank you for any help.
JBO-29114 ADFContext is not setup to process message for this exception.
Use the exception stack trace and error code to ivestigate the root cause
of this exception. Root cause error code is JBO-29000.
<LifecycleImpl> <_handleException> ADF_FACES-60098:Faces lifecycle receives unhandled exceptions in phase RENDER_RESPONSE 6
oracle.jbo.JboException: JBO-29000: Unexpected exception caught: java.lang.NullPointerException, msg=Cannot invoke method minus() on null object
     at oracle.jbo.ExprEval.internalEvaluateGroovyScript(ExprEval.java:1218)
     at oracle.jbo.ExprEval.doEvaluate(ExprEval.java:1253)
     at oracle.jbo.ExprEval.evaluateForRow(ExprEval.java:1075)
     at oracle.jbo.server.ViewObjectImpl.createViewAccessorRS(ViewObjectImpl.java:16203)

I'm not Using a custom seach.....
I just define my LOV using a Model Driven List. and select Option ComboBox with Lovs.....
the lov with the issue belong to a detail table. I got several ComboBoxes working fine in similar model.... master/detail and the lov in the detail table.
thank you

Combobox with LOV showing ID but would like to display more meaningful text

Hi, I'm experimenting with JDeveloper 11.2.
I have a base table/eo with an FK ID to another table/eo which is a lookup table.
On the base tables view I have created a combobox with LOV but it is showing the ID and I'd like it to show the name from the lookup table.
So rather than showing the ID 1 I'd like it to show James instead.
I can just about remember being able to do this in Oracle Designer.
I know this is something stupid but I've searched Google and not come up with anything.
CREATE TABLE ACCOUNTS
ACCOUNT_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
ACCOUNT_LOGIN VARCHAR2(30 CHAR) NOT NULL,
FIRST_NAME VARCHAR2(50 CHAR) NOT NULL,
LAST_NAME VARCHAR2(50 CHAR) NOT NULL,
EMAIL VARCHAR2(150 CHAR),
CREATED_TIMESTAMP TIMESTAMP(6) WITH LOCAL TIME ZONE DEFAULT SYSTIMESTAMP NOT NULL
ALTER TABLE ACCOUNTS ADD (
CONSTRAINT ACCOUNTS_PK
PRIMARY KEY
(ACCOUNT_ID));
CREATE TABLE ACCOUNT_MODULE_ROLES
ACCOUNT_MODULE_ROLE_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
ACCOUNT_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
MODULE_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
ACCOUNT_ROLE_ID NUMBER NOT NULL
ALTER TABLE ACCOUNT_MODULE_ROLES ADD (
CONSTRAINT ACCOUNT_ROLES_PK
PRIMARY KEY
(ACCOUNT_MODULE_ROLE_ID));
ALTER TABLE ACCOUNT_MODULE_ROLES ADD (
CONSTRAINT AMR_ACC_FK
FOREIGN KEY (ACCOUNT_ID)
REFERENCES ACCOUNTS (ACCOUNT_ID)
ON DELETE CASCADE
ENABLE VALIDATE);
I've created the LOV on AccountModuleRolesView.

1. Create a transient attribute AccountFirstName. - Created in AccountModuleRolesView1, attributes a transient string called AccountFirstName with an alias of VIEW_ATTR
2. Create a VA on accountId attribute. - VA? There is a tab called View Accessors and I have three, one for each of the FK's.
3. In attribute mapping ... Where abouts is that? After I've created the LOV?
map ... accountId to accountId I did this in the LOV, list return values, using the VA's I linked in.
and fristName to accountFirstName. Did this also in the same place.
4. In UI hints shuttle accountFirstName. The field doesn't show up in the list to shuffle, only the underlying eo attributes.

Help with LOVs 2

Sorry for the "repetition"
I opened this thread
Help with LOVs
but I forgot to ask another question that is related,
once I call up my LOV, how can I use the value that I select from that LOV and use it to display specific info? like getting the ID to use it in a select statement??
thanks In Advance!!

In order of price here are some suggestions:
Seashore (free)
Graphic Coverter ($45 approx)
Acorn ($50 approx)
Photoshop Elements ($75 approx)
There are many, many other options. Search on MacUpdate.
Regards
TD

Performance issues with LOV bindings in 3-tier BC4J architecture

We are running BC4J and JClient (Jdeveloper 9.0.3.4/9iAS 9.0.2) in a 3-tier architecture, and have problems with the performance.
One of our problems are comboboxes with LOV bindings. The view objects that provides data for the LOV bindings contains simple queries from tables with only 4-10 rows, and there are no view links or entity objects to these views.
To create the LOV binding and to set the model for the combobox takes about 1 second for each combobox.
We have tried most of tips in http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/tips/muench/jclientperf/index.html, but they do not seem to help on our problem.
The performance is OK (if not great) when the same code is running as 2-tier.
Does anyone have any good suggestions?

I can recommend that you look at the following two bugs in Metalink: Bug 2640945 and Bug 3621502
They are related to the disabling of the TCP socket-level acknowledgement which slows down remote communications for EJB components using ORMI (the protocol used by Oracle OC4J) to communicate between remote EJB client and server.
A BC4J Application Module deployed as an EJB suffers this same network latency penalty due to the TCP acknowledgement.
A customer sent me information (that you'll see there as a part of Bug# 3621502) like this on a related issue:
We found our application runs very slow in 3-Tier mode (JClient, BC4J deployed
as EJB Session Bean on 9iAS server 9.0.2 enterprise edition). We spent a lot
of time to tune up our codes but that helped very little. Eventually, we found
the problem seemed to happen on TCP level. There is a 200ms delay in TCP
level. After we read some documents about Nagle Algorithm, we disabled a
registry key (TcpDelAckTicks) in windows2000 on both client and server. This
makes our program a lot faster.
Anyway, we think we should provide our clients a better solution other than
changing windows registry for them, for example, there may be a way to disable
that Nagle's algorithm through java.net.Socket.setTcpNoDelay(true), in BC4J,
or anywhere in our codes. We have not figured out yet.
Bug 2640945 was fixed in Oracle Application Server 10g (v9.0.4) and it now disables this TCP Acknowledgement on the server side in that release. In the BugDB, I see backport patches available for earlier 9.0.3 and 9.0.2 releases of IAS as well.
Bug 3621502 is requesting that that same disabling also be performed on the client side by the ORMI code. I have received a test patch from development to try out, but haven't had the chance yet.
The customer's workaround in the interim was to disable this TCP Acknowledgement at the OS level by modifying a Windows registry setting as noted above.
See Also http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=328890
"New registry entry for controlling the TCP Acknowledgment (ACK) behavior in Windows XP and in Windows Server 2003" which documents that the registry entry to change disable this acknowledgement has a different name in Windows XP and Windows 2003.
Hope this info helps. It would be useful to hear back from you on whether this helps your performance issue.

How to use ADF Query search with EJB 3.0

Hi,
In ADF guide http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12839_01/web.1111/b31974/web_search_bc.htm#CIHIJABA
The steps to create query search with ADF Business Components says:
"+From the Data Controls panel, select the data collection and expand the Named Criteria node to display a list of named view criteria.+"
But with EJB, I'm not able to find Named Criteria node. Can we use ADF query search component with EJB? If yes, can you please show me some example, tutorial etc.?
Thanks
BJ

For EJBs you'll need to implement the query model on your own.
An example of how the model should look like is in the ADF Faces components demo.
http://jdevadf.oracle.com/adf-richclient-demo/faces/components/query.jspx
Code here:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/adf/adffaces/11/doc/demo/adf_faces_rc_demo.html

How do i change the setting so that when i type something in the address bar, it searches with google. it's started using yahoo and i hate yahoo, i'm even considering leaving firefox

somethings i type something in the address bar, like 'paypal', mozilla used to go straight to that website, which was helpful... then it started searching with google, this i was not too upset about... however now it has started searching with yahoo, this i am upset about, and i would like to change this, however i do not know how?

1. Use free AdwareMedic by clicking “Download ” from here
    http://www.adwaremedic.com/index.php
    Install , open, and run it by clicking “Scan for Adware” button   to remove adware.
    Once done, quit AdwareMedic by clicking AdwareMedic in the menu bar and selecting
    “Quit AdwareMedic”.
2. Safari > Preferences > Extensions
     Turn those off and relaunch Safari to test .
     Turn those on one by one and test.
3. Safari > Preferences > Search > Search Engine :
    Select your preferred   search engine.
4. Safari > Preferences > General > Homepage:
     Set your Homepage.

How to enhance the standard search with custom field?

Hi all,
I would like to know the general optimal procedure to enhance the standard searches like Opportunity search or Lead search.
I've gone through some of the threads here. Some suggest, to add the new field using AET and copy the IMPL class of the search and then code the custom logic. Some say, append the new field to the structure of the search object and then implement the BADI.
I'm actually a bit confused to understand the correct procedure.
Can someone please help me with a generic procedure to enhance the standard search with a custom field?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Maren,
Once I have got the same development. I have followed the below steps, please check with this. Let me know for further inputs.
Add new field using Append structure of type ‘XXX’ in search
Create BADI implementation for Enhancement spot ‘ES_CRM_RF_Q1O_SEARCH’ and include filter ‘BTQOPP’
Put your logic in BADI implementation – SEARCH method
Add it in WebUI configuration
Remove the operator if required
Regards,
Swadini Sujanaranjan

Searching with in a SharePoint 2013 Document Library

Hi,
i want to search document library by passing values from Search box to Search Results webpart. I m not able to search with in the document library although i have configured content source and result sources.
With Regards,
Jaskaran Singh

You can try using a web form html webpart in a web part page instead.
Use Designer to add additional search columns and you should be able to create something usable.
Steven Andrews
SharePoint Business Analyst: LiveNation Entertainment
Blog: baron72.wordpress.com
Twitter: Follow @backpackerd00d
My Wiki Articles:
CodePlex Corner Series
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves (or helps) your problem.

How to customize quick query to search with SQL in contain keyword

I want to build simple query using quick query component. But it will search with SQL equal keyword. How can I customize it to use contain keyword instead. That means, I enter 'sc' to return 'scott'.

Not sure if the technique described here http://tompeez.wordpress.com/2011/08/21/extending-viewcriteria-to-use-sql-contains-4/ can be used for quick query, but you can try ...
Timo

How to search with multiple constraints in the new java API?

I'm having a problem using the new MDM API to do searches with multiple constraints. Here are the classes I'm trying to use, and the scenario I'm trying to implement:
Classes:
SearchItem: Interface
SearchGroup: implements SearchItem, empty constructor,
             addSearchItem (requires SearchDimension and SearchConstraint, or just a SearchItem),
             setComparisonOperator
SearchParameter: implements SearchItem, constructor requires SearchDimension and SearchConstraint objects
Search: extends SearchGroup, constructor requires TableId object
RetrieveLimitedRecordsCommand: setSearch method requires Search object
FieldDimension: constructor requires FieldId object or FieldIds[] fieldPath
TextSearchConstraint: constructor requires string value and int comparisonOperator(enum)
BooleanSearchConstraint: constructor requires boolean value
Scenario:
Okay, so say we have a main table, Products. We want to search the table for the following:
field IsActive = true
field ProductColor = red or blue or green
So the question is how to build this search with the above classes? Everything I've tried so far results in the following error:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Search group nesting is currently not supported.
     at com.sap.mdm.search.SearchGroup.addSearchItem(Unknown Source)
I can do just the ProductColor search like this:
Search mySearch = new Search(<Products TableId>);
mySearch.setComparisonOperator(Search.OR_OPERATOR);
FieldDimension myColorFieldDim = new FieldDimension(<ProductColor FieldId>);
TextSearchConstraint myTextConRed = new TextSearchConstraint("red",TextSearchConstraint.EQUALS);
TextSearchConstraint myTextConBlue = new TextSearchConstraint("blue",TextSearchConstraint.EQUALS);
TextSearchConstraint myTextConGreen = new TextSearchConstraint("green",TextSearchConstraint.EQUALS);
mySearch.addSearchItem(myColorFieldDim,myTextConRed);
mySearch.addSearchItem(myColorFieldDim,myTextConBlue);
mySearch.addSearchItem(myColorFieldDim,myTextConGreen);
the question is how do I add the AND of the BooleanSearchConstraint?
FieldDimension myActiveFieldDim = new FieldDimension(<IsActive FieldId>);
BooleanSearchConstraint myBoolCon = new BooleanSearchConstraint(true);
I can't just add it to mySearch because mySearch is using OR operator, so it would return ALL of the Products records that match IsActive = true. I tried creating a higher level Search object like this:
Search topSearch = new Search(<Products TableId>);
topSearch.setComparisonOperator(Search.AND_OPERATOR);
topSearch.addSearchItem(mySearch);
topSearch.addSearchItem(myActiveFieldDim,myBoolCon);
But when I do this I get the above "Search group nesting is currently not supported" error. Does that mean this kind of search cannot be done with the new MDM API?

I'm actually testing a pre-release of SP05 right now, and it still is not functional. The best that can be done is to use a PickListSearchConstraint to act as an OR within a field. But PickList is limited to lookup Id values, text attribute values, numeric attribute values and coupled attribute values. It works for me in some cases where I have lookup Id values, but not in other cases where the users want to search on multiple text values within a single field.

IFS Searching with other Search Engines

Is it possible to set up iFS searching with or without interMedia) that would work with a search engine for static pages, like Infoseek?
From an "end-users" point of view, I would like to have them search for a document, some of which may be stored in the database, but others are html pages used for the site.

You would have to write a custom program which would submit searches to IFS and to your Infoseek search engine, and then combine the results for the end user.
Or you could use iFS and Intermedia to index the static HTML pages.

Search with LOV

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for