Security object for check against Lab office in DIR

Hi,
We are running R/3 46C and use DMS to store our business documents via online vault. I have a requirement to set up access based on Lab office (department) that is used in the Document Information Record. Is there a standard security object that I can use in security roles to build this.
Any info would be appreciated and rewarded.
Regards
Nirmal

Your best option would be to use a user exit, for example badi "document_main01" "before_save" to populate the auth. group field, and then use normal roles/profiles to check on auth. group.
Regards,
Espen
Please reward if useful.

Similar Messages

Security object for shipping conditions (T-Code VA02-sales order)

Hi
I need to gray out filed-VSBED (shipping conditions) in T-code VA02 (sales order change) for users, what could be the security object to be used for this requirement?
Regards
sri

The functional requirement till doesnt seem very clear to me , why would someone want to grey this field? (unless you have a strong case that you use different document types for normal orders, express deliveries, normal service, free of charge and a whole lot of possibilities)
Your SD consultant should guide and let you know that:
Shipping conditions are defined in customizing
you can eithe assign particular shipping conditions to particuar sales document types to make it as a default
(or) you can have the shipping conditions defined in the customer master
the ones set up in SPRO take a preference, but as you rightly noticed - if a use wishes to change the shipping conditions proposed by the system he would be able to do that, and this CANNOT be controlled with authorization objects
The only option you would have, is to find out if the users who are not suppposed to change the conditions beong to the same user group (or make a logical assesment on the common binding feature in the set of users)
then evaluate if you want to make the program changes such that the changes affect only the particular set of users
Note: Changes you make in ABAP do not necessarily apply to the complete user base - it depends on how well you analyse and plan the requirement

Securing Printers for Check Printings

Hello -
We want to designate a printer for printing checks only. We do not want anyone else printing to this printer. Ideally, we don't want anything going to this printer but the checks.
Is there a way to configure security for a printer within SAP? We tried at the network level, but it generates errors.
Unfornately searching sap with termns like printer and security are bring in too many irrelevant results.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.

in your system you need to identify all printer with a unique name.
In mentioned object S_SPO_DEV you can allow users (in roles) to accees a specific printer, but also be sure to limit all other users NOT to be able to print
So i would give all users in a general user role access to all printers exept the specific one. and have One role giving access to that specific printer. In all other roles set teh object to inactive and you are in control of that printer via role assignment

Using Product Structure for checking out originals of child DIR's

I have a requirement of creating a package of documents.
Some of my DIR's are linked to service notification, some are linked to Purchse Order, & some are linked to Sales order.....
Each service notification, PO, SO is linked to one master DIR, so that they can be seen under Product Structure.
Is there any method to extract(Check Out) all the originals of all these DIR's at one place using Product structure.
Or can we atleast create a link between Master DIR and all child DIR's.
Please giude me.
Points for sure.

Hi,
as far as I know there is no way to check out a product structure, but you can check out a document structure.
If you DIR has a bill of documents, you can use the BAPI CheckOutView2. The parameter GetStructure determines weather the structure is read or not.
- GetStructure = 0 Document structure is not read
- GetStructure = 1 Document structure is exploded one level
- GetStructure = 2 Document structure is exploded completely
Regards Iring

SAP security - changing check maintain setting for security objects

I am trying to change the check maintain indicator for a couple of transactions
to alow me to manage access based on security objects that are not currently defined as check maintain. Specifically, I have updated the check indicator
(using SU24) to check maintain for object c_stue_ber on transactions MD11 and MD12 (planned order create/change). The transactions still do not check this object as expected. Does anything else need to be done to enable checking an
object that is not set up as check maintain originally?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Doug Scott

Hello Kerstin,
I also wrote a message to SAP and got the following response. Looks like there are no security checks for this object in these transactions.
Regards,
Doug
Response from SAP
03.04.2007 - 12:48:38 CET SAP Reply
Dear Doug,
An authority check on C_STUE_BER is not possible for the transactions
CO02, CO03, MD11, MD12, CO26, CO27, CO28, COOIS, COHV, CO05, CO05N,
CO04N, COMAC or CO46.
In CO01 we check if the user has the authority to resolve the BOM
(C_STUE_BER). After resolving the BOM we don't check any longer with
C_STUE_BER since we don't work with the BOM but with a component list
in the order (which is actually a copy or the BOM).
For this component list there is no authority check.
The component list is visible in CO02, CO03, CO26, CO27, CO28, COOIS,
COHV, CO05N, CO04N, COMAC, CO46.
For production orders we use authority C_AFKO_AWA. With this
authority you can limit the access to CO02, CO03 and the change of
production orders by other transactions.
But please note that there are still transactions
that will display the orders and its components without authority
checks. For example infosystem transactions (COOIS, COHV, CO26, CO27,
...) and other processing transactions (COGI, ...). For those
transactions you would have to limit access.
For the creation of planned orders MD11, the authority check C_STUE_BER
is not used. Here you can use M_MTDI_ORG to check on a MRP controller.
So you should enter the same MRP controller in the material master
of the troublesome products and only this MRP controller will be able
to create a planned order for this material.
I am sorry not to be able to offer you any better solution for this
problem.
Kind Regards
Eoin Donnelly
SAP Support Consultant (SCM)
SAP GSC Ireland

Authority-Check Object for PLANT(WERKS)?

Hi Experts,
By using "V_VBAK_VKO" Authority Object am checking the user Authentication against the sales area(Sales OrgDistr. ChannelDivision) in my custom report. Below is the code,
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'V_VBAK_VKO'
    ID 'VKORG' FIELD s_vkorg
    ID 'VTWEG' FIELD s_vtweg
    ID 'SPART' FIELD s_spart
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '01'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'.
(Note: My report is for SD/OTC module)
I also need to check the authenmtication of user against entered PLANT (WERKS) in selection screen, so, pls. let me know that What is the Authority-Check Object for PLANT(WERKS)
Thank you

Hi,
Transaction SU20, search for WERKS.
When you find it, double click on the row, in the bottom half of the resulting screen there is a list of authorisation objects that contain the field.
Unfortunately, you can't navigate from this list into the definition of the objects, so you'll need to cross-reference against transaction SU21.
Regards,
Nick

IP in NW2004s - Security error for object ALVL

Hi,
When we try to create aggregation level on a realtime infoprovider getting security error. It says "No authorization for object ALVL..."
We are at NW2004s -SP7. This object was included in the role with an "*". Security trace for ABAP as well Java does not tell anything. The infoprovider is a regular one with out any We did try with much broader security like SAP_ALL.
Did anyone encountered this type of Issue?
Any help is appreciated.
Regards,
Surges Ablactating

Suresh,
Check out thread
Integrated Planning Object - ALVL
You will need the following
Authorization objects for business planning:
- S_RS_ALVL: Authorizations for working with aggregation levels
- S_RS_PLSE: Authorizations for working with planning functions
- S_RS_PLSQ: Authorizations for working with planning sequences
- S_RS_PLST: Authorizations for working with planning function types
- S_RS_PLENQ: Authorizations for maintaining or displaying lock settings
Dennis

ATP Check against customer stock for return Sale order

Hi Friends,
Pl.help in this.
1. Is it possible to configure ATP check against Customer stock in a Sale order/Return order/any other way? ( Actuallly, client wants to take back empty cylinders through return sale order by ATP check against the customer stock)
Regards,
Mani

Hi Mani ,
Are you taking cylinder as returable packing item or not?
ex- For soft drinks or beverages industry it pretty common , they use thel returnable package material type and more over why you want use return sales order for this?
Note- Just plz explain scenario to MM and PP People also as availability check with all combination
Hope it is helpful to you,
Regards
Venkat

Are there any good tool for checking security risks, Code review, memory leakages for SharePoint projects?

Are there any good tool for checking security risks, Code review, memory leakages for SharePoint projects?
I found one such tool "Fortify" in the below link. Are there any such kind of tools available which supports SharePoint?
Reference: http://www.securityresearch.at/en/development/fortify/
Amalaraja Fernando,
SharePoint Architect
Please Mark As Answer if my post solves your problem or Vote As Helpful if a post has been helpful for you. This post is provided "AS IS" with no warrenties and confers no rights.

Hi Amalaraja Fernando,
I'm not sure that there is one more tool that combines all these features. But you may take a look at these solutions:
SharePoint diagnostic manager
SharePoint enterprise manager
What is SPCop SharePoint Code Analysis?
Dmitry
Lightning Tools Check
out our SharePoint tools and web parts |
Lightning Tools Blog | Мой Блог

DropTarget check against all objects on the stage

Hey all,
Not sure the best way to do this. I have a class we will call DropActivity, here is the code
package com.activitycontrol
          import com.activitycontrol.DropCheck;
          public class DropActivity
               // Constants:
               // Public Properties:
               // Private Properties:
               private var _selectedClip:Object;
                    // Initialization:
                    public function DropActivity(/*selectedClip:Object*/)
                    // Public Methods:
                    public function set selectedClip(selectedClip:Object):void
                              _selectedClip = selectedClip;
                    public function stopDraggingMe():void
                                   var dropCheck:DropCheck = new DropCheck();
                                   //dropCheck.checkAgainst = dropTarget.name; ///***********
                                   if (dropCheck.canBeDropped == true)
                                        _selectedClip.stopDrag();
                    // Protected Methods:
when the stopDraggingMe() method is called from another object (code shown below) I need to see all the objects on the stage to see what objects on the stage my currently selected movie clip is over and assign it to the dropCheck.checkAgainst method (that will be checked against an array to see if it can in fact be dropped, if so set the canBeDropped value to true and therefor run the .stopDrag() ). I have read using root is not a good coding practice in AS 3.
call to the stopDraggingme() mehod.
private function setDown(event:MouseEvent):void
                         var droppedItem:DropActivity = new DropActivity();
                         droppedItem.selectedClip = this;
                         droppedItem.stopDraggingMe();

No, I think I can use drop target, I just need to use it from the DropActivity class and not a document class. I just don't know how to use it from a non-document class.
"and you need to loop through all displayobjects to see which have a positive hitTest with your dropped object, correct?"
I am trying to say..... ok, what movie clip is currently under the one I have selected, the drop activity class knows what object I have selcted as it is in the selectedClip variable. so I need to find out what clip is under it ......... the light just came on!
answer duh......dropCheck.checkAgainst = _selectedClip.dropTarget.parent.name;
thanks a bunch kglad you have helped me out once again, you are the man. I might just have to buy you a beer one of these days.

Windows 2012 server security checklist for corporate company standard/recommended check-list

Hello All,
Good Day.
I am looking for Windows 2012 server security checklist (standard hardening
settings), would you kindly assist me by providing Wintel 2012 standard/recommended check-list ASAP?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
The Microsoft Security Compliance Manager 3.0 tool is designed to provide you with an end-to-end solution to help you plan, deploy, and monitor security baselines for computers running Windows Server 2012 in your environment.
For more detailed information, please refer to the articles below:
Windows Server 2012 Security Baseline
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj898542.aspx
Security Hardening Tips and Recommendations
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18931.security-hardening-tips-and-recommendations.aspx
Regards,
Mandy
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

ATP check and Check against preliminary planning for prod order

Hi
For same material, order type and plant for some orders ATP check is happening and for some orders Check against preliminary planning is happening.I want to know why its happening.
Regards,
PradeepM.

Pradeep,
What types of orders? Do you mean SD orders?
ATP check is defaulted 'on' or 'not on' by the MRP Strategy(OPPS, look for "availability check"). MRP strategy is in turn determined by the MRP strategy group in the plant-level material master. Assuming, then, that your MRP strategy group contains only one MRP strategy (this is common), then the default check will be set by MRP strategy group.
ATP check can subsequently be turned on/off other ways in SD, leaving you with either no ATP, or possibly an Availability check against planning.
So, if you are talking about sales orders, and not PP orders, the most likely place for 'turning off'' the ATP check is with the schedule line category. A close second culprit is with the requirements class of the SO item. SD configuration will determine the default requirements type, requirements class, and the default Schedule line category. Study the sales orders in question in VA03. Specifically look at the requirements type (procurement tab of SO Item) and the Schedule line category (goto-item-schedule lines). Then, look at the configuration for
Schedule line category: OVZ8
Mapping of requirements type to requirements class : OVZH
Requirements class: OVZ0
Look at the setting for 'AvC'. If it is 'on', you will get ATP against product. If it is off, you will get either an ATP against planning, or no ATP at all.
If you wish to change the determination of the Requirements type, or the determination of the Schedule line category in SD, you should probably discuss with your local SD functional expert. A small change here can have many unintended consequences.
Best Regards,
DB49

ATP check and Check against planning for a production order

Hi
When I create a production order for some orders it is ATP check and for some orders it is showing 2 in type avail check is check against planning in coois screen. Because of this orders are gettign released even though BOM material is out of stock.Can I know in which situations the orders will come under the second scenario. I always want the orders should be in ATP check
regards,
PradeepM.

Hi,
If you want only ATP check, then in MRP-3 view of the mtl master change the checking group to the same value as the one which you find to be following the ATP check.
However before making this change do consult your colleagues in other domains, as this will impact all places where Av. check is done.
Hope it clarifies.
Regards,
Vivek

HT5312 How do I check my security answers for my ID. I'm sure I put them the answers in correctly but Apple says I am wrong. There seems to be no facility to check what answers Apple have.

How do I check my security answers for my ID? I'm sure I have put them in correctly but Apple says they are wrong. There seems to be no facility to check what answers Apple has and I do not have a rescue e-mail address.

Read the article you linked

[svn] 1433: adding 'console' security constraint to MBeanServerGateway remote object for MBean tests and ds-console , used when running on Websphere with administrative security enabled.

Revision: 1433
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-28 13:13:12 -0700 (Mon, 28 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
adding 'console' security constraint to MBeanServerGateway remote object for MBean tests and ds-console, used when running on Websphere with administrative security enabled. Should call setCredentials("bob","bob1") to use this RO.
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/remoting-config.mods.xml
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/services-config.mods.xml

Hi,
It seems that you were using Hyper-V Remote Management Configuration Utility from the link
http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/HVRemote, if so, you can refer to the following link.
Configure Hyper-V Remote Management in seconds
http://blogs.technet.com/jhoward/archive/2008/11/14/configure-hyper-v-remote-management-in-seconds.aspx
By the way, if you want to perform the further research about Hyper-V Remote Management Configuration Utility, it is recommend that you to get further
support in the corresponding community so that you can get the most qualified pool of respondents. Thanks for your understanding.
For your convenience, I have list the related link as followed.
Discussions for Hyper-V Remote Management Configuration Utility
http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/HVRemote/Thread/List.aspx
Best Regards,
Vincent Hu

Security object for check against Lab office in DIR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for