Sendmail broken from Solaris 10 11/06 to Solaris 10 8/07 - port 25 broken

I am in the process of building a new solaris 10 8/07 server to replace a solaris 10 11/06 server. Both are running.
Sendmail on both has changes limited to:
correcting /etc/hosts to include mailhost entry
dns server pointing to localhost as mailhost
local-host-names set on each
aliases set up and newaliases run
Otherwise, the configuration files are standard and both are running the as shipped main.cf.
svcadm enable -r network/smtp seems to work fine and the services show as enabled
The 11/06 server has run fine for close to a year.
The 8/07 server has mconnect work fine to localhost but I get connection denied when I try to come in via the ip number.
TCP Wrappers are not running, but even then I have hosts.allow set with lots of variations of ALL: ALL.
No errors in /var/log/syslog.
How do I figure out what is happening on the port and why it is not connecting?
# mconnect localhost
connecting to host localhost (127.0.0.1), port 25
connection open
220 mailhost.molten-rock.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 16:44:25 +1300 (NZDT)
# mconnect magma
connecting to host magma (192.168.25.250), port 25
connect: Connection refused
# uname -a
SunOS magma 5.10 Generic_127112-02 i86pc i386 i86pc
# svcs | grep smtp
online 15:45:50 svc:/network/smtp:sendmail

Thanks, but had found a previous discussion with this hint and applied it.
svccfg -s sendmail listprop shows config /local_only = false
Yes, I would really love to fix the fault, but what I would really like is some hints as to how to debug ports under svc control.

Similar Messages

Migrating C/C++Development environment from Solaris 6 OS to Solaris 10 OS.

Hi,
I have several questions. Hope i can get some advises.
I am tasks to do a migration for my current Development environment from Solaris 6 OS to Solaris 10 OS.
Current Scenaros:
=============
My Development environment is on Solaris 6 OS machine ( 5.6 Generic_105181-31 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2 )
and where i did my C/C++ codings and compilation for my company software application.
We have purchased a new machine Solaris 10 OS machine ( 5.10 Generic_125100-07 sun4u sparcSUNW,Sun-Fire-V210 )
with the objective to replace the old development H/W and OS.
The machine ( Solaris 6 OS) where the software application currently is running will also be replace with a new machine ( Solaris 10 OS).
The Software application is purely C/C++ codings and has no database requirements.
The application is make up of several executables and they utilise the Solaris Unix queues.
The source codes are compiled using Sun compiliers and libraries.
Problems:
========
I did the followings:
1. Installed the Solaris 10 OS machine with all the necessary compilers and libraries for my C/C++ codes.
2. I ported over all my sourcecodes and makefiles from the old machine ( Solaris 6 ) to the new machine ( Solaris 10 )
3. I did a recompilation of the source codes on the new Solaris 10 machine and hit many errors as followings:
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/rstream.h", line 46: Error: The name istream is ambiguous, istream and std::istream.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/rstream.h", line 46: Error: The type "istream" is incomplete.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/stringid.h", line 50: Error: The name ostream is ambiguous, ostream and std::ostream.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/stringid.h", line 50: Error: The name ostream is ambiguous, ostream and std::ostream.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/rwdate.h", line 82: Error: The name istream is ambiguous, istream and std::istream.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/vstream.h", line 92: Error: The name ios is ambiguous, ios and std::ios.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/vstream.h", line 92: Error: eofbit is not a member of ios.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/locale.h", line 115: Error: The name ios is ambiguous, ios and std::ios.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/rwdate.h", line 151: Error: The name ostream is ambiguous, ostream and std::ostream.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/rwerr.h", line 197: Error: The name ios is ambiguous, ios and std::ios.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/cstring.h", line 347: Error: The name istream is ambiguous, istream and std::istream.
Questions:
========
1. Can anyone advise on these errors messages that i am seeing?
2. Can i say that as long i can successful recompile my codes on Solaris 10 , my application will work?
3. Can i simply copy my application ( Compiled in Solaris 6 ) directly to the new Solaris 10 machine and expect it to run properly? What are the concerns if i adopt this approach.
Regards,
Edwin

I did the followings:
1. Installed the Solaris 10 OS machine with all the necessary compilers and libraries for my C/C++ codes.
2. I ported over all my sourcecodes and makefiles from the old machine ( Solaris 6 ) to the new machine ( Solaris 10 )
3. I did a recompilation of the source codes on the new Solaris 10 machine and hit many errors as followings:
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/rstream.h", line 46: Error: The name istream is ambiguous, istream and std::istream.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/rstream.h", line 46: Error: The type "istream" is incomplete.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/stringid.h", line 50: Error: The name ostream is ambiguous, ostream and std::ostream.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/stringid.h", line 50: Error: The name ostream is ambiguous, ostream and std::ostream.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/rwdate.h", line 82: Error: The name istream is ambiguous, istream and std::istream.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/vstream.h", line 92: Error: The name ios is ambiguous, ios and std::ios.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/vstream.h", line 92: Error: eofbit is not a member of ios.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/locale.h", line 115: Error: The name ios is ambiguous, ios and std::ios.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/rwdate.h", line 151: Error: The name ostream is ambiguous, ostream and std::ostream.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/rwerr.h", line 197: Error: The name ios is ambiguous, ios and std::ios.
"/opt/SUNWspro/prod/include/CC/rw7/rw/cstring.h", line 347: Error: The name istream is ambiguous, istream and std::istream.
Questions:
========
1. Can anyone advise on these errors messages that i am seeing?My guess would be that the names have changed from Solaris 6 to Solaris 10.
2. Can i say that as long i can successful recompile my codes on Solaris 10 , my application will work?No. I've seen GNU utilities that compile without error and then fail on make test or make check. A clean compile only means that, a clean compile nothing more.
3. Can i simply copy my application ( Compiled in Solaris 6 ) directly to the new Solaris 10 machine and expect it to run properly? What are the concerns if i adopt this approach.It might. The easiest way to find out is to just move it and see what happens. On a test machine of course.
alan

Application Migration from HP-UNIX to SUN Solaris

Hi Gurus,
Need help on the application migration from HP-UNIX to Sun Solaris . Copied the filesystems APPL_TOP, OA_HTML, OA_JAVA, COMMON_TOP/util and COMMON_TOP/_pages from SOURCE( HP) to TARGET SUN-solaris as per 238276.1
Now trying to clone Autoconfig XML context file on the TARGET System
perl adclonectx.pl migrate java=\opt\java1.4 \
contextfile=\ul01\app\applmgr\lasrx\admin\LASRX_fiapd4.xml
Error: source context file ul01appapplmgrlasrxadminLASRX_fiapd4.xml does not exist.
Questions:
======
1. we still need to install jdk in the TARGET or copy the file system from source(HP) to target( Solaris) bring the JDK and how to check jdk on Solaris?
2. In clone autoconfig XML, contextfile=? Is the location of SOURCE or TARGER?
3. I think running above with root permission.
Please help somebody on this issue.
Thank You.

Hi Hussein,
I need your help on the Application migration from HP-UNIX to SUN Solaris. As per the note 238276.1 we dont copy $806_ORACLE_HOME for cross platform migration, Copied all the filesystem from SOURCE to TARGET but rename it because it suppose to create while installing Middle tier.
Issue:1
=====
When i start to set environment like below, i get the error and
. /ul01/app/applmgr/lasrx/APPSORA.env
ksh: /ul02/app/oracle/lasrx/8.0.6_new/LASRX_fiapd4.env: not found
I am trying to install Middle Tier Technology Stack on SUN server ( Migrating from HP-UNIX to SUN solaris)
Issue 2: ( Display error) while install Tech Stack
=====
./rapidwiz -techstack
Rapid Install Wizard is validating your file system......
>> Wizard requires the DISPLAY variable to be set.
>> Please set your DISPLAY variable and restart Rapid Install Wizard.
even i can not see
echo $DISPLAY because not set the environment.
Need your help and suggetions on this.
Thank You.

Migrating from 8.1.7 (on Solaris) to 10.2.0 (to Linux/Windows)

Hi,
Our company is considering to migrate our database from 8.1.7 (on Solaris) to 10.2.0 (on either Linux or Windows). Currently, I'm testing on migrating our database from 8.1.7.0.0 (on Solaris) to 10.2.0 (on Windows 2000 Advanced Server). I checked the 8i menu and found I cannot take advantage of "transportable tablespace" due to different platforms. I also tried to export and import the schemas but failed due to complicated referential integrity constraints among those schemas. Just wondering is there any other way I can try in order to migrate the database to 10.2.0 on a Windows platform successfully?
Any input will be appreciated!

Add this paramter CONSTRAINTS=NO while exporting, could be one solution.
Amir

Upgrade from Solaris 11 Express to Solaris 11 Release (11/11); Guide MIA?

Would there be an easy way to upgrade from Solaris 11 Express to Solaris 11 Release (11/11)? The FAQ for Solaris 11 Release has the following hopeful text:
Can I upgrade to Oracle Solaris 11 from Oracle Solaris 11 Express or Oracle Solaris 11 Early Adopter?
Yes. Customers can upgrade to Oracle Solaris 11 by using the package management tools. Refer to the Oracle Solaris 11
Transition Guide (http://www.oracle.com/pls/topic/lookup?ctx=E23824&id=MF JAI) for more information
But that link comes up with an error page 404, "topic not found".
The one transition guide I can find is:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E23824_01/html/E21799/index.html
But that covers Solaris 10 jumpstart, not Solaris 11 Express or Early Adopter.
The Solaris 11 documentation at:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/documentation/index.html
Also seems to mention only Solaris 10, not 11 Express or Early Adopter.
I have already downloaded the full repo for Solaris 11 Release, and the live installer, but I'm hoping it's something as simple as pointing the ips manager to a new repository, or just loading the full repo I already have as a local source. I would also like to keep the dtrace and sun studio set up I have now in the Express version, without reinstalling them on a new release version on bare metal.
If it keeps the features of the express version while ironing out a few kinks (gdm authentication bug, etc.), that would rock.
Many Thanks,
Gordon

Alan, Thank You, that worked with no problem at all. 11 Express was already using the correct repository, and only required a pkg command update, then other updates.
So here's what I'm guessing:
1. The Oracle Solaris maintained repository for Express and Early Adopter are now the same as Release, but they do require an updated pkg executable and pkg update command.
2. The second form of the command mentioned in the update guide:
# pkg set-publisher -g http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release
-G http://internal.co.com/solaris solaris
is for using a local copy of the repository within our lan or vpn wan.
3. Updates should be fairly regular now that Solaris 11 is in release version.
I think the new hash (SHA 256) fried some of our old gdm settings for our users, so we're creating new user accounts, and migrating the older accounts. We don't have too many, so it's not a problem for us. But that brings up another point:
4. The graphical user manager in Express is now gone, and user and group management are now done with command line interface.
That's fine with me as well. I always use ssh to connect to the machine and then run the screen command for administration. The graphical user manager was always kludgy in Express, and I couldn't get it to work correctly anyway.
This is great stuff so far. Well done.
Gordon

How to upgrade from Solaris 10 u2 to Solaris 10 u3 using Live Upgrade?

Does anyone know how I can use "live upgrade" (or any other method) for upgrading my solaris 10 u2 to Solaris 10 u3?
I can't find instructions anywhere! ugh.
Thank you for your help!

Try the following documentation:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-6396
For future reference, I found this by going to sun.com -> documentation -> Solaris Operating Systems -> Solaris 10 Operating System -> Solaris 10 11/06 Release and Installation Collection.
-- Alan

Jumpstart Solaris 8 vs. Solaris 10 (sparc)

Hello Solaris Community.
I'm wondering if anyone else has seen this behaviour.
With Solaris 8, we've had a process in place for awhile now which has worked well. We've simply been creating compressed configuration tarfiles, parking them on an nfs share, then booting the Sun client from cd/dvd rom drive, using the appropriate obp command line:
boot cdrom - install nowin dhcp \
nfs://<nfsserver>/<path_to_compressed_config>/<config_tarball>
The machine would then go through the process of starting the kernel, grabbing an IP addres, grabbing the compressed config file, then kicking off the automated install. No need to mess with creating boot servers, etc.
With the inception of Solaris 10, however, this seems to have become broken. The system will start the kernel, obtain an IP address (with success), then promptly bust into an un-breakable loop of death. Here's the output:
.... [snip]
Configuring devices.
Trying DHCP on hme0
Success
Using DHCP for network configuration information.
<unknown>: warning: dhcpagent: daemonize: timed out awaiting adoption.
DHCP: using local media
/sbin/install-discovery: /usr/bin/loadkeys: not found
[ network/physical:default failed (see 'svcs -x' for details) ]
Feb 24 06:38:17 svc.startd[7]: svc:/network/loopback:default: Method "/lib/svc/method/net-loopback" failed with exit status 1.
[ network/loopback:default failed (see 'svcs -x' for details) ]
Feb 24 06:38:17 svc.startd[7]: svc:/system/filesystem/usr:default: Method "/lib/svc/method/fs-usr" failed with exit status 1.
Feb 24 06:38:18 svc.startd[7]: svc:/system/filesystem/usr:default: Method "/lib/svc/method/fs-usr" failed with exit status 1.
Feb 24 06:38:18 svc.startd[7]: svc:/system/filesystem/usr:default: Method "/lib/svc/method/fs-usr" failed with exit status 1.
[ system/filesystem/usr:default failed (see 'svcs -x' for details) ]
Requesting System Maintenance Mode
(See /lib/svc/share/README for more information.)
Console login serice(s) cannot run
svc.startd: Could not exec() sulogin: No such file or directory
Requesting System Maintenance Mode
(See /lib/svc/share/README for more information.)
....... endless loop.
Something's obviously been modified for 10 -- has Sun removed the option for using compressed tar configuration files or something?
Thanks.

If you try to use slice1 as the root instead of Tools/Boot you get this error. You can still boot off the CD using slice1 as normal. We have modified the jumpstart to use this as well.
This works in the bootparams:
j197-svr root=jump8:/export/jump/slices.606/slice0.files/Solaris_10/Tools/Boot install=jump8:/export/jump/slices.606/slice0.files .....

Solaris 8 in a Solaris 10 Container

Dear all,
we came upon the question whether it's possible to run Solaris 8 in a Solaris 10 container. Hereby, the idea is to be able to use Solaris 10 with its great ability of server virtualisation but also to use a Oracle 8i certified operating system at the same time.
Any ideas?
Greetings
/Marc

Ok, that was exactly my first impression. Anyway, i
came to know that there's a project about running
FreeBSD in a Solaris 10 Container. How does this work
if there's just a single (so shared) kernel? Can't
image a FreeBSD system running a Solaris kernel.Here's a quote from a Sun blog on the project:
An example of what I mean is ZoneBSD, an opensource initiative with as goal "will be to factor as much Solaris code as necessary into FreeBSD in order to support running a FreeBSD container within a Solaris 10 Zone", really cool stuff... or as they say around here "Sweeet".
(I can no longer find any current link to the project).
So yes, it appears to have been quite an ambitious project involving merging kernel bits. Not something that's going to help you do anything with Oracle on Solaris 10 GA.
Darren

Solaris 8 binary compatibility - Solaris 7

Greetings:
and TIA.
Also apologies if this issue has been covered via some other resource.
Note: Hardware Utilized - Sparc
We have recently ported our 4.2 Forte C++/C code successfully from Solaris 6 to Solaris 8. As part of that port, we upgraded the compiler resources from 4.2 to 6.0. With these new binaries we have encountered the following runtime issue:
Solaris 8 code runs fine on Solaris 8, however these same executables dump core on Solaris 7
To troubleshoot this, we built the same code on a Solaris 7 platform. These executables ran fine on both Solaris 7 and Solaris 8
My question: Are Solaris 8 binaries incompatible with Solaris 7? Is there any online documentations which provides an overview/explanation for this behavior?
Regards:

In general there is forward compatibility for applications between Solaris releases. There is no official backward compatibility. This means you
should always compile on the oldest release of
Solaris that you expectto run on. So, if you need
to run on Solaris 5.6, 7 and 8, compile on Solaris 5.6.
There is a tool called appcert which is shipped with
later versions of Solaris 8 and can be downloaded from:
http://www.sun.com/developers/tools/appcert/download.html
That will give you a good idea of the forward and backward compatibility of your application. General ABI information can be found at:
http://www.sun.com/developers/tools/abi/index.html
Alan
Sun Developer Technical Support
http://www.sun.com/developers/support

Cannot start Solaris Management Console in Solaris 9

I cannot start the Solaris Management Console in Solaris 9. The splash screen appears for a few seconds, then nothing else.
There is a error: "Assertion Fail: Offset < fFileSize ..." something like that.
Please help me~~~~~~~

Java Bug 4838130:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4838130.html
suggests to trace the problem by running the java application with JAVA2D_DEBUGFONTS defined, so try
env JAVA2D_DEBUGFONTS=1 smc
The bug report also documents a workaround: Set the environment variable JAVA_FONTS to
/usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType, i.e.
env JAVA_FONTS=/usr/openwin/lib/X11/fonts/TrueType smc

My socket plug for my charger has broken from no fault of my own, can I get a new one for free?

The plug that you plug onto the socket has broken from no fault of my own, cAn I claim for a new one?

Take it into Apple with your iPad and they will evaluate the plug
and replace if it has a manufacturing defect.

I want to downgrade Solaris 2.7 to Solaris 2.5

We have Solaris 2.7 pre-installed operating system. i want to change Solaris 2.7 to Solaris 2.5 operating system. Because our softwares is running under 2.5. Do you have procedure on how to downgrade OS?
Thanks in Advance,
[email protected] or
[email protected]

Might be advisable to also ask in this forum area:
Servers and Enterprise Software
if you still have trouble.

Solaris 2.6 to Solaris 8

Hi,
we have deliver a Motif 1.2 application to a customer a few years ago. This application is currently running under Solaris 2.6 on IBM PC computer (Pentium II), is built using X11R6 and is using MWM.
Now this customer is replacing the old computers by new SUN Blade 150 and would like us to port our application to run on these new machines with Solaris 8.
I'm trying to figure out the details of this port. Anyone has been through something similar? Is it as simple as recompiling the application under Solaris 8? Where can I find more information about this?
Thanks in advance...
Luc Leblanc

To make sure the upgrade does not touch the mountpoints you mention, I would recommend that you comment them out of the /etc/vfstab file before the upgrade.
RE: the HP software. You will need to check with HP to see if that version of that software is compatible with Solaris 8. The Solaris upgrade should not modify this software, but that does not guarantee it will work under Solaris 8.
Solaris 8 does not have seperate upgrade and full versions. Any Solaris 8 media kit can be used to do an initial or upgrade installation.
If you have sunsolve access, I recommend looking for infodoc 16141, which has a list of general suggestions to help insure the Solaris OS is upgradable.
Something else to look at is the LiveUpgrade program. This allows you to make a copy of your current OS, upgrade the copy, and verify that its functionality meets your needs. If the upgrade is does not function as you hope, you can easily go back to the previous version of Solaris. More info can be found at http://docs.sun.com/?p=/doc/806-7933
HTH,
ct

I have purchased my i phone 5 one month back, unfortunately I have got some hardware problem like some part has been broken from inside, but the phone works without any issue, Did anybody face this issue?

I have purchased my i phone 5 one month back, unfortunately I have got some hardware problem like some part has been broken from inside, but the phone works without any issue, Did anybody face this issue?

If you believe there is a hardware problem, call AppleCare or make an appointment at an Apple Store if there is one nearby.

My iPod fall from me last night, and it's front glass broken what should I do throw my ipod in the trash and go buy another one or there 's a way to fix it. (mind that the ipod is working probably) ipod touch 4

My iPod fall from me last night, and it's front glass broken what should I do throw my ipod in the trash and go buy another one or there 's a way to fix it. (mind that the ipod is working probably) ipod touch 4

You'll have to get it serviced by Apple, you'll have to pay for the replacement device:
Apple - Support - iPod - Repair pricing
Apple - Support - Service Answer Center
You can also search for a 3rd party repair company in the Internet.

Cisco 3548 xl and ports broken

Hello could you please help me.
we have several ports broken in cat 3548 xl ( fast 35,37,38,39) when we are trying to connect new workstations to them, ports do not work.
there is over 80 procent packet loss.
all other ports work ok.
Do you konw if there is a known problem in cat 3548xl's. ( could not find anything in bug toolkit)
our version is flash:c3500XL-c3h2s-mz-120-5.3.WC.1.bin
Model number: WS-C3548-XL-EN
System serial number: FAB0534M322
i thank you in advance,
best regards,
Susanna

Hello all and thank you for the replies !
i can now open the referred cisco-page. I will check the page
Here are anwers to all questions. we will boot the switch as soon as possible and see what happens.
do you know a good debug command what to use to see if port is acting wrong ?
i know it is not a duplex problem, since we have had a lot of duplex problems ( and this is a different case). All the other ports seem to work fine ( except for 35,37,38, 38)
laptop had only 10/100 nic and it works fine with another 3548 ( next to the 'faulty switch).
both the printer and laptop had same kind of problem.
Here are the tests
1) first the switch port and printer had auto config ( auto speed/auto duplex) in ports/ nic.
--> only 20 % of pings succeeded.
sometimes ping succeeded 10 times and then there was 30 fialed ping-packets.
2) then printers configuration was changed to 100/FD. the link started to work ( ping succeeded 100%) the switch had still auto speed and duplex, and therefore switch had only 100/HD.
when i changed switch port to 100/full, printer lost its network connection and did not answer at all to pings.
3 ) when i changed the switch port back to auto ( autospeed/auto duplex) the printer did not start to work again.
when swicth and laptop/printer were configure to auto, switch saw the port as 100/FD, negotiation was ok. as soon as data was going to the port, connection stopped working.
here is the show int . it is down, since we cant use the port at the moment. but as you can see there are no errors
BTW the printer and laptop work fine in the same switch in port 41.
best regards TIA ! Susanna
FastEthernet0/38 is down, line protocol is down
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0007.5070.5d26 (bia 0007.5070.5d26
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 0 Kbit, DLY 0 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Auto-duplex , Auto Speed , 100BaseTX/FX
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input never, output 2d17h, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 2d21h
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
12126 packets input, 2217643 bytes
Received 918 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 101 multicast
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
32145 packets output, 3533981 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 50 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Sendmail broken from Solaris 10 11/06 to Solaris 10 8/07 - port 25 broken

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for