Separtae PO for the third party vendor while adding the item in the sales

Hi
There is any possible to create to separate PO for the added new item (third party vendor)in the existing sale order .
Thanks
Ramesh

I don't think it will update the Billing Date. However, In VF while creating Invoice, we can mention the required Date.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka

Similar Messages

Who will do benefit enrollment? third party or In sap itself? who is the third party vendor?

who will do benefit enrollment? third party or In sap itself? who is the third party vendor?

Hi Rakesh,
Who should handle benefit enrollement depends on client requirement.
In SAP Benefit Administration module we do have enrollment function.
Here is the document
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/8a5f51545711d1891c0000e8322f96/content.htm
Client may chose to only store benefit related information and take help of other third party vendor and use interfaces to communicate it to SAP for payroll and master data maintenance.
Aon Hewitt is one of the well known vendors. Might be more not sure of all names.
Hope it answers your question.
Regards,
Jignya

Mass update of Third Party Vendor at PO Line item pricing condition

Hi All,
We have requirement from business as follows:
We are using item level condition for Lumper Charge in PO and it is for Third Party Vendor. We maintain vendor in pricing condition record so it will be automatically populated while PO is created. Recently vendor is changed so we have also updated new vendor in pricing condition record so it will be taken care when new POs will be created. But there are thousand open POs in which new vendor needs to be updated.
Is there any way to mass update third party vendor at PO line item level?
Relevant pointers will be rewarded.
Regards,
Tt

Hi,
You may check the following options:
1. If the freight vendor was pulled through condition record, then change the vendor in the condition record and update the pricing in MEI1. Refer the KBA: 1819416 - Condition records not getting updated automatically when using MEI1/MEI4
2. If the condition is manual condition, there is no option to mass change the vendor in standard, as of my knowledge. You may create a custom program to change the vendor in the PO. Refer the similar thread: Mass update of freight vendor in PO condition
Regards,
AKPT

Is it possible for a third party to be added to an esatblished text message thread?

Is it possible for a third party to be added to a text message thread (between 2 people). This test message thread has been established for over a year! He says he could see our message history via his icloud. Is this possible? Please help.....

How "third party" are we talking about here.....? Not another user (usually family) who has access to the same Apple Id, is it? I know, that seems too obvious.....
Could you explain the situation a little more? Did you or the other party forward your iMessage ("text" between "i" devices/Mac users) to this 3rd party? How did this 3rd party end up with any portion of your conversation (or is that the question)? I know it is easy to forward a portion of your conversation to another user. When you choose to forward a "text bubble", you receive round check boxes next to all messages in the conversation; you just pick and choose how much you want the 3rd party to receive. Other than that method, I know of no way to loop in a 3rd party to an existing conversation via iPhone or iPad.
Anyone else?
Best of luck,
Bill

How to create new subsite while adding new item to the list by using javascript?

hi,
I hav a task ie, when I add item to the list then subsite will create with that list item title and description . So By using javascript, I have to create subsite while adding new item to the list.
Help me to solve this.
Thank you,

Is your item getting added through Javascript client object model ? If yes, you can write in the success delegate of your list creation method the logic to create the subsite.
function CreateListItem()
var clientContext = new SP.ClientContext.get_current();
var oList = clientContext.get_web().get_lists().getByTitle('List Name');
var itemCreateInfo = new SP.ListItemCreationInformation();
this.oListItem = oList.addItem(itemCreateInfo);
oListItem.set_item('Title', 'My New Item!');
oListItem.set_item('Body', 'Hello World!');
oListItem.update();
clientContext.load(oListItem);
clientContext.executeQueryAsync(Function.createDelegate(this, this.CreateListItemOnSuccess), Function.createDelegate(this, this.onQueryFailed));
function CreateListItemOnSuccess() {
var subsiteTitle = oListItem.get_item('Title');
//Logic to create a subsite
function onQueryFailed(sender, args) {
I have added a sample flow for the above scenario. Have a look at the following lnk for how you can craete a subsite using ecmascript.
http://ravisoftltd.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/sharepoint-2010-create-site-with-ecma-script-with/
Geetanjali Arora | My blogs |

The cart on the retail website is not adding new items to the cart. The items in the cart are replaced by new items added

The cart was not being updated. Firefox recommended all history for this website be cleared. All History was cleared. It resolved the problem of adding items to the cart. But now there is a new problem. The item in the cart is being replaced by new items ordered. So the cart has only ONE (The latest item ordered) in the cart. How can I resolve this issue?

Thanks... I got it....

EDI message is not sending to the third party for one particular SA

DearAll,
We have the scenario to send the schedule lines to the third party system. for one particular schedule agreement schedule lines not sending to the third party system.
while processing the messgae it is giving the error as "Message XEDI already processed on 20110317 070042"
What could be the reason?.. we have checked all the EDI settings maintained for this supplier. some two weeks back there is no problem now only getting this message.
how to resolve this?..
Thanks in Advance
Ananth.

Hi Hareesh,
Thanks a lot for the help. I have tried with removing the xml namespace, still the same result. I believe, the problem is with MTs tag in response message structure, bank xml data is trying to map with the response structure in PI, but when its finding the MTs tag I believe then its not mapping, and directly its passing the response in SXMB_MONI without any mapping.
My question is how can I define my response structure without the MTs tagm, I mean same as what I am receiving from bank.
Also I tried with without any mapping in response structure, I mean I used only one Message type for "response from bank" to "response to ECC" , without xml namespace, in this case I am able to receive the response in ECC, but there is exception called "PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA Error during XML => ABAP
conversion: Response Message; CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT in " while receiving response, and when I go and see the logs, it says "System expected element 'MT_Response_MT940_Test'" , as its try to match with the defined structure in PI.
Please experts help me, so my question is how can I avoid the MTs tag in my response structure, I just want to define my response structure in PI same as bank is sending me the data in xml tag, without any MTs tag.
Thanks,
Farhan

Employee Vendor and Third Party Vendor Posting Issue

Dear Experts,
I have an issue while Posting of Employee Vendor and Third Party Vendor.
In T706K table, maintained symbolic account offset entry MJ90 Wage Type but its asking for Symbolic Exp account too. Otherwise, while posting its says Trip has no postable entries.
I should get entry in FB03 as mentioned below
Employee Vendor (Dr)
Service Tax (Dr)
Third Party Vendor (Cr)
Awaiting for quick response.
Regards
Shaik

Hi Sieg,
Thanks for your reply.
Company has given Forex advance to employee via third party vendor
So, We need to debit the amount into Employee Vendor and Credit into Third Party Vendor
For Ex: Third Party Vendor is Thomas Cook (Forex Provider)
Please guide me how to post the above entry in Standard.
Regards
Shaik

SAP SD integration when Scraping materials at third party vendor place

Hi,
Could you please guide how do I map the below scenarios:
1. The Pharma materials are all batch managed. Now the co' has got pharma returns and the credit memo to be issued for all those valid returns. How do I trace the batch while taking return as I have to create return with ref to a billing document only?? Advice on how to map this!
2. Also, the expired materials are destroyed and scraped at the third party vendor place. Now how , in what way do I account through SAP SD process?
Please advice and your inputs are highly appreciated.Thanks in advance!
Regards,

Hi Shrihari
well, it is a bit tricky to refer the billing document because the last one could have the latest batch and which high likely will be a different batch.
For case one, we actually do refer the billing document if for example the wrong ship to party was entered in sales order, the wrong products have been shipped or when goods have been damaged in transit.
When we have a case like the one I 've l mentionned above, the customes tells us by email about the return, we then acknowledge the return by return of email usually and then when goods arrive at warehouse, they are booked as return (normal retun w/o reference to billing document).
What we also face it that sometimes the customers buys the product in , say january, but was not able to sell whole purchased quantity and then wants (in may) to return the remaining product to us. Well we have a policy that we do not accept such returns. sold is sold.
For case two, the customer may return damaged goods to us, we create a sales order return to our warehouse, at 0 price, so we actually do not issue a credit note, but rather book the quantities back into inventory stock blocked and subsequently issue then as scrapped (mvt type 555)
What the customers destroys at their permises w/o informing us, then we do not take any action.
Regards
Sidi

A "VZW free msg" says a phone on my account "made a charge with a third-party vendor ... ."

This evening, I got a "VZW free msg" alerting me that a phone on my account had "made a charge with a third-party vendor." This is the second such message I've gotten this billing period. The messages are identical. My bill for the current billing period won't be ready till this weekend, so I have no way to track down any details. The phone belongs to my wife, and I am absolutely certain that she has not billed anything to her phone. The maddening thing about these messages is they give no details. Who's the third-party vendor? How much was the charge? What did my wife supposedly buy? No such details appear in the text message, and I can't find details anywhere on the My Verizon site.
This text message does add: "For details or to block such charges: www.verizonwirel." (That's correct as written—I presume some of the message got truncated. That's how the message appeared both times.) However, I can't find any documentation about how to block these charges.
After I got the first of these messages, I called Verizon's customer service number (800.922.0204). A very pleasant gentleman noted my concern and checked my account. He found no such third-party charges, and he advised me to look carefully at my next bill. I left it at that until I got the second message this evening.
Speaking of customer service: This evening, I tried twice calling Verizon's customer service number. Both times, the call ended with a recorded voice telling me, "I'm sorry, but your call cannot be processed at this time. Please try your call later." Huh? Why not an offer to leave my number for a call-back? They as much as hung up on me. Not impressed. And, by the way, why doesn't Verizon post their customer service number on the Web site? I had to dig up the number by way of www.gethuman.com.

Contact us on every page has the number.
*611 from your device works as well.
That third party stuff is probably "cramming" Verizon just got hit with this practice which is illegal.
The law states you can call Verizon up and have them place a permenant block on third party services.
They cannot refuse and you do not have to pay for them.
Notify the FCC http://www.FCC.gov or the Federal Trade Commission http://www.FTC.gov
Good Luck

Restrict PO creation with a third Party vendor

Hi,
I would like restrict a user for PO (ME21n) creation if the vendor belongs to the third party vendor account group?
Regards
Sreeni
Edited by: sadasiva srinivasa rao on Oct 12, 2010 5:27 PM

closing

Third Party Vendor Error

Hello everyone
We have certain vendors who are set up in the system with wagetypes such as 2AFL,2DEN and 2MED, which are used for deducting money from EE's paycheque and then sending to third party vendor.
However, when I compare the vendor report and the report of how much has been removed from the EE's paycheque, I see that a couple of hundred dollars is missing.
The money has been deducted from EE pay but its not going to the vendor.
I know that wagetypes are linked to symbolic accounts which in turn are linked to the GL accounts.
Any suggestions on why this error could be happening ?

Hai..
There are certain deductions like say for Ex.. Garnishments where the total amount deducted from the employee is not directly posted to vendor's account small part of the amount goes to employers as service charge...
so in this case the total deduction amount will be reflected from the EE. But will not be reflected in the Vendor..
Kindly make sure if 100% of the deduction is being credited to vendors account.. to aviod inconsistencies...
Manohar

Segregate third party vendor and inter-co vendor POs

Hello,
We have a situation where the business would like to prevent Supply chain buyers (inter/intra company POs), from creating POs against third party vendors.
1) We have explored the option to create new POrg (for ICO only) and move all ICO vendors to the this new POrg. Then this POrg would be setup in the supply chain users' security profile so they cannot create POs against third party POrg. But this requires a significant amount of effort and alot of master data/ sources of supply updates.
2) The second option is to create different document types for inter and intra company POs. Then the doc type would be assigned in the security profile to prevent supply chain from creating third party POs (currently, doc type UB is used for intra-co POs however, doc type "NB" is used for both 3rd party as well as Inter-company POs).
3) Another one we thought of is to create each buyer as a Purchasing Group and set that in their secuity profile. This option also works good as we want to implement a PO Release Strategy.
However, we are still stuck on how to check that the vendor used on the PO is an ICO vendor and not a third party (for both options 2 and 3). Does anyone have an insight on how we can ensure that the vendors on an inter/intra company PO is infact an ICO vendor? We want to make sure that our supply chain folks do not create POs for third party vendors.
Thanks,
Batul.

Hi,
If you are going for option 3, you may create the release strategy with the field CEKKO - RESWK (EKKO - RESWK) (Supplying plant). This field will be filled with plant only in case of STO and you can trigger corresponding release strategy. If its third party vendors, the above field will be empty.
Regards,
AKPT

Iphone and third party vendors like Bose and ihome

Do the third party vendors like Bose and iHome plan to make adapters so the iphone can be used in those systems?

Bose and iHome already work with iPhone. I have used both plenty of times. It helps to have airplane mode on so that there is no interference from data but they work fine now.

Indicator for third party vendor

Hi,
I would like to know how to create third party vendor in SAP. Is there any indicator that indicate that the particular vendor is third party vendor?
Please advise.
Thanks.

You can do it using partner function
But before it , you have make customization in SPRO for vendor master.
Regard,
Riten

Separtae PO for the third party vendor while adding the item in the sales

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for