Sequence of sequence

Are Sequence of sequence's supported in WLE?

yes
raghunath Sekhar wrote:
Are Sequence of sequence's supported in WLE?

Similar Messages

Can a strored procedure contain Drop Sequence /Create Sequence statement?

I am trying to schedule a job to update the starting value of a sequence. So I need to write a strored procedure to drop and then recreate the sequence. But when i tried to cimpile the follwing stored procedue, it gave me the error "'DROP' is not a valid identifier". Is it illegal to have "Drop Sequence /Create Sequence " in a stored procedue? If this is true, is there any way to accomplish my task (simply recreate the same sequence with different starting value every month)? Thanks!
Begin
DROP SEQUENCE TEST_SEQ;
CREATE SEQUENCE TEST_SEQ
START WITH 0
MAXVALUE 999999999999
MINVALUE 0
NOCYCLE NOCACHE NOORDER;
End

In general, it is a bad idea to try to encode information into a key because it
- complicates queries in the future
- complicates updates to the data in the future
- can easily be generated on the fly from other data elements
Inevitably, if you do something like what was proposed, you'll find out that the data encoded in the key gets out of date from the data stored in the row, that users are writing queries that do things like strip off the first 6 characters of the string in order to do date searches, and that users discover they want to be able to modify the data to fix the data that's encoded in the keys, which can be terribly expensive if there are child tables.
Rather than trying to do this, I would store a DATE value and a non-reset sequence. You can always generate the reference number for the user by doing a TO_CHAR on the DATE and concatenating the output of an appropriate ranking function. If the users decide that they need to correct the DATE of an event, the reference number will be updated automagically since it was never stored in the database. A number generated in the query can also be guaranteed to be gap-free, which tends to please users.
Justin

Why it is creating the null sequence in sequence file while dynamically creating a sequence file using c#

I am creating sequences in sequence file dynamically using c#.it is creating a null sequence in the sequence file everytime of execution.I have red marked in the attachments showing the difference between the original sequence and the null sequence.How can I prevent thos.Can you please help me solve this?

duplicate
Regards
Ray Farmer

Drag sequence into sequence (not nesting).

Drag sequence into sequence (not nesting). It was possible in the previous version of Premiere but now, when I drag the sequence into a new sequence it's not mergind all video and audio into one clip anymore. It was REALLY usefull. How can I do it again. Don't tell me to NEST sequences... this is not the same and now what I need. I wss dragin the sequence from the browser into a new sequence so it was easy to add effect on the entire sequence and also, my audio clips were combine into that one clip sequence too which was amazing. Now, with Premiere pro CC, when I drag that sequence from the browser into a new sequence, I get the original sequence... just like if I've copy/paste the entire sequence... = really bad and useless !

I wss dragin the sequence from the browser into a new sequence
That is nesting.
But with CC there is now the option of adding the sequence as a one clip, or adding the original clips from the sequence. You'll find the switch in the top left of the sequence panel, under the timecode and near the magnet and wrench icons.

Sequence to Sequence 3 point edit

I am a FCP Newbie, Avid long time lover.
FCP is nice, but has it's moments.
These forums are great.
I have been working on a project now for two months and have learnt from the manuals and the "FCP for Avid editors" PeachpitPress book (a god send).
My question is this,
I hate the FCP subclip function so I prefer to go through my cutaway tapes and create a sequence that has all the best shots.
This way I can pre-create short sequences of shots, and save time wading through wilds when cutting.
I set F9 & F10 to "insert sequence content" and "overwrite sequence content" so that I don't end up with sequences in sequences when I final cut.
All goes well when I edit, except for three point edits.
FCP can't load sequences into the timeline from the Viewer (Avid has this handy feature so you can easily edit from one seq to another, and make navigating through footage easier!),
so I load a seq into the viewer, scrub to a clip I want,
and press 'mark clip'.
I see that it has marked the in and out for my selected clip; good.
Then I go to my timeline and find where I want the shot to END
(sometimes I know where a cutaway should end, rather then a start point),
so I mark the end point.
Next I press overwrite,
Now I would expect the shot to lay nicely where I marked an end.
But it does not,
it rather inserts ALL the shots from the viewer sequence (from the in point to the end of it's sequence), and it puts them at the start of my timeline!
Am I doing something wrong?
Has anyone found a way to make FCP behave with three point edit from seq to seq?

this is a circuitous way to work in FCP.
How so?
I am interested in a simpler or faster way of working with cutaways and footage.
I am working on documentaries with 10s of hours of unscripted footage.
There is base voiceovers and interviews that need to be covered with cutaways and recreations.
I spend time watching all the footage and found that if I break it into subclips it turns into bins full of 100s of subclips.
So I have to label each one to differentiate them.
This takes a long time to give each one a different title.
Or I could look at the small thumbnails, but then inevitably it shows the wrong frame or doesn't give me an idea of what movement it contains.
Loading each into the viewer to view them is slow going when I could just scrub through a sequence timeline of good shots.
Mini-select timelines allow me to create much fewer clips in a bin to view.
I name the sequence as to what cutaways they refer.
And again I can pre-create small sequences, or place them in an order that is not alphabetical.
I find the subclip limits annoying very often.
When I am breaking up my wilds I select the exact duration of a clip that looks nice
(I can fairly well spot how long a shot looks good before it misses it's target, or doesn't suit the style of edit).
But sometimes I need to extend it, or often add dissolves in the sequence in one of the many tweaking stages of editing; subclip limits are really annoying then.
Is there a way to always remove subclip limits when they are inserted in a sequence?

The sequence named "sequence name" is setup incorrectly.

Hi everyone , I am using a trigger on my database when inserting a records..
when i persiste the entity i am getting this error
Exception Description: The sequence named [SEQUENCE_PROJECT_ASSIGNMENT] is setup incorrectly. Its increment does not match its pre-allocation size.; nested exception is: oracle.oc4j.rmi.OracleRemoteException: javax.persistence.EntityExistsException:
Can anyone help me please...
I am using EJB 3.0
Thank you for your kind cooperation
Regards
Lutchumaya

Okay. Suppose we have a simple entity:
@Entity
public class Book implements Serializable {
    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(
        strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE,
        generator = "bookIdGen"
    @SequenceGenerator(
        name = "bookIdGen",
        sequenceName = "seq_books_id",
        allocationSize = 1
    private Long id;
    // some more code
}This configuration tells EJB3 (namely JPA) to fill in the id from a sequence "seq_books_id". It is important that the sequence is defined like that:
CREATE SEQUENCE seq_books_id START WITH 1 INCREMENT BY 1; -- it's the value of INCREMENT BY that really mattersThe value of INCREMENT BY in your sequence should match the value of allocationSize in the @SequenceGenerator annotation shown above. The approach with the sequence generator allows you to forget about triggers here - the id is filled in automatically by JPA.
Janusz

Sequence Issue - sequence keeps getting renamed?

I just upgraded to FCP 7 (from 5) and when I drop a clip into my sequence, it automatically renames the sequence as whatever that clip is labeled. Why is this, and how do I get it to stop doing this?
More info: I created the sequence settings by dragging a clip into the timeline and selecting "yes" to "Change sequence settings to match the clip settings" - is this why?

The first step in troubleshooting is to delete the Preference files associated with the application.
These instructions are for FCP 6 but should still apply:
Deleting FCP Preferences:
Open a Finder window. Set the view mode to columns:
Click the house icon that has your name next to it.
Click the folder "Library" in the next column.
Find and click the folder "Preferences" in the next column.
Find and click the folder "Final Cut Pro User Data" in the next column.
Move the files "Final Cut Pro 6.0 Prefs", "Final Cut Pro Obj Cache" and "Final Cut Pro Prof Cache" to the Trash and empty it.
When you have a stable set of preference files, download [Preference Manager|http://www.digitalrebellion.com/pref_man.htm] to back them up. If you have further problems, the backup can be recalled and you can continue working.

Sequence in sequence Like Picture in Picture

I have a background (People dancing)and foreground sequence (Talking heads)and I want to scale the foreground sequence and various different places throughout. I dont seem to be able to apply a motion filter to a sequence. can you help?
G5 Mac OS X (10.4.7)

If you nest the clips, with the background on V1 and the foreground on V2, you can add a motion effect to the pair. Just select the pair, type option+c to create the nest. Then with the resulting single layer nest selected, type on the return key to open it in the Viewer...
Jerry

Sequence in Sequence

Hi, Is there way to play 4 animated sequences in a row (ie: Sequence 1 followed by Seq 2, followed by Seq 3 etc) Cheers
Gazzzz

If you nest the clips, with the background on V1 and the foreground on V2, you can add a motion effect to the pair. Just select the pair, type option+c to create the nest. Then with the resulting single layer nest selected, type on the return key to open it in the Viewer...
Jerry

Sequence and sequence files advice

I am embarking on a project to test two way radios using around 50 tests (receiever and transmitter).
It seems each test should be in its own sequence but should each sequence be in its own sequence file? - or should they all be in just a few files?
I am just not sure on the pros & cons of individual sequence files vs having many sequences in one file, so I'd appreciate any advice on the subject.
Many thanks,
Ronnie
TestStand 4.2.1, LabVIEW 2009, LabWindows/CVI 2009

Hey Ronnie,
I would absolutely not put each Sequence in its own Sequence File - this is completely unnecessary and will add in a lot of maintenance overhead to your development. However, that being said, the way in which you organize your Sequences on a Sequence File basis is a matter of both personal preference and application architecture. Placing all application Sequences within a single Sequence File will be easier to keep track of, as they'll all be contained within a single file that you need to maintain. That being said, there are often logical reasons to involve a few different Sequence Files under the umbrella of one single application.
For example, what if you were creating a "library" of commonly utilized tests/Sequences and you wanted to store those common Sequences in one Sequence File, but put a set of application or UUT-specific Sequences within a separate Sequence File? This would make sense, as all applications (no matter which UUT) could then utilize your common "library" Sequence File and you'd introduce a nice modularity to your system. This is just one example in which this might make perfect sense.
You can expand upon this and ask yourself - does each test really need its own Sequence (it might, depending on how many steps-per-test) or can each test be more simply organized in the form of an individual code module, thereby cutting down on the number of Sequences you need?
There are more architecture considerations discussed in our TestStand Customer Education courses (both online and regional). Let me know if you'd be interested in finding out more information about the courses.
Derrick S.
Product Manager
NI DIAdem
National Instruments

Sequence within sequence... do chapter markers come with it at QT?

Hi,
I've had a look around, can't see this and have searched. When I drop a sequence into a sequence, do the chapter markers come with it so when I QT them and send to IDVD, the sequence chapters will be there or on the new timeline with the completed sequences, should I (again) add markers?
Thank you.

Never used that feature, wouldn't have known it would keep the timeline markers, but a good solution.
Only caveat is that it doesn't show the markers in the nest itself. (if one wanted to have the visual reference.)
I've never been really hip on using nests, preferring to dupe seqs, with incremental naming...personal preference.
K
Message was edited by: Kevan D. Holdsworth

Patched audio track renders in sequence, but sequence won't render

Odd problem. I clipped a bit of sound out of the audio track and patched in a clip from elsewhere. The two clips are red, but it renders and plays...in the sequence.

John Kernan wrote:
...The two clips are red, but it renders and plays...in the sequence.
May be there are offline (but still in cache) since they are red.
Michel Boissonneault

Audio clips change when moved from sequence to sequence in FCP7

Working on a documentary piece within FCP7 and am having problems with moving audio from one sequence to another. Both sequences have the same settings, but when I copy the audio clip and paste it into the new sequence, the audio that pastes is from the same clip but is not what I copied. Does anyone know why this is happening and/or how to fix this?

Just to back up Michael. The native sample rate for video is 48khz. To work at anything other than that is to ask for problems.
x

Sequence to sequence to sequence to sequence.....

In trying to import edited sequences from the browser to a NEW timeline, I'm allowed to do it only once. If I try to attach another edited sequence, I am prevented with the message: Sequences cannot be added recursively. Is there no way to finesse that? - to build a sequence from edited work already done? (This is in FCP 4.5.) - THANKS!
G5 Mac OS X (10.0.x)

I'm trying to import edited film scenes from the browser, and compile them into a new sequence in the timeline. < </div>
No, you're not importing them, that's a separate function and the language barrier here might be large part of your problem.
In other words, I wish to move scenes A, B, and C into the timeline, for what I might called Sequence 1.....< </div>
This is something I do all the time. It's apparent, but not certain, that you are expecting FCP to work in some way that it does not. Nested sequences are not complicated but they are unique.
Here's another question: < </div>
Easier if you only use one post for one question. Otherwise, how will you know where to look for an answer?
Can you "reopen" an imported (edited) scene, once it's in the timeline? < </div>
If you "exported" it as a self contained movie, no. It's no longer a sequence, it is now a clip. Hence the language problem. If you have simply moved a nested sequence from the browser to the timeline, of course you can. See the manual for NEST. You must option-double click. However, copying and pasting a sequence into the timeline is completely different from editing it into the timeline.
I've tried doubleclicking on what's called a "nested" sequence. But it doesn't open it to it's edited components. It just highlights it, as though I mean to delete it. - Thanks again! < </div>
Right, you didn't look carefully enough at the manual and you're expecting a nest to behave like a clip. It doesn't.
bogiesan

Sequence to sequence editing....

Hey all,
I'm working on a music video with a ton of B-Roll footage that I've selected to a sequence. I want to know if it's possible to edit this sequence into my master sequence using the source monitor without nesting the clips.
i.e. - load my selects sequence to the source moitor and edit to the timeline without the clips being nested. The resulting clips on the timeline would be the original clips and not a nest. Make any sense?
Thanks.

it should work when you hold APPLE and press F-10. I have it mapped myself...look in the Keyboard Layout.
Shane

Sequence of sequence

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for