Service binded on only one ethernet interface

Hello everyone.
I am stuck with a little problem on Snow Leopard Server.
I want to open an auxiliary ssh server on the port 443, so I duplicated the /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/sshh.plist
I modified the label with a new name and set the socketName to https (443)
After loading and starting the services I have the following pb:
on 127.0.0.1:443 the server is working fine.
on my LAN interface (en1 or en2)10.0.0.1:443 the server is working fine
on my WAN interface (en0) 82.XX.XX.XX:443 the server cannot be reached...
the firewall is setted to let pass everything and I am sure of any NAT.
even if I try an "ssh 82.XXX.XXX.XXX -p 443" on the server itself, I have no answer.
Any idea?
Best Regards

Construct your MulticastSocket with not just a port number but with a SocketAddress as the bind address, containing the port number and a non-null InetAddress representing the local IP address to bind to, i.e. the network interface to listen at. If the InetAddress is null or absent the socket listens at all local network interfaces.
MulticastSocket.setNetworkInterface() controls which interface is used when sending.
If you are doing all this, so as to restrict multicasting, you also need to make sure to join and leave your multicast group(s) via the same network interface(s) as above.

Similar Messages

How do I add an airport extreme to a cable modem with only one ethernet port, while keeping that port connected to my Mac?

I have a mac pro connected by ethernet to a cable modem via ethernet. There is only one ethernet port on the modem.
I want to keep the Mac connected via ethernet for speed. Is there a way that I can add an airport extreme to this set up - for my ipad and roku, and for guests to use - or do I need to buy a router to put between the modem and the mac?
If I need a router, what kind?
Thanks.

The modem connects to the WAN "O" port on an AirPort Extreme router.
The Mac Pro connects to one of the three LAN <-> ports on the AirPort Extreme router.
Or if you do not need the ability to connect a hard drive to the USB port on the router, you can save a bit by using an AirPort Express.
The modem connects to the WAN "O" port, the Mac Pro connects to the LAN <-> port
Either the AirPort Extreme router or AirPort Express router will allow up to 50 wireless device to connect.
There are many other wireless modems offered by other manufacturers as well.

How to resolve error 'The DPMRA service terminated with service-specific error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted'

One of my exchange 2010 servers dpm agent is give the following error when the dpmra service attempts to start.
The DPMRA service terminated with service-specific error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted..
I have tried uninstalling/reinstalling the agent but this does not resolve the issue
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
William Hickson

Hi
Something has probably changed on the protected server side that affects the DPM agent. In some cases the DCOM configuration could change. Look at this blogpost and verify your DPMRA DCOM object.
http://robertanddpm.blogspot.com/2010/08/dpm-ra-rights.html
If this doesn't do the trick try reinstall the agent.
Best Regards
Robert Hedblom
MVP DPM
Check out my DPM blog @ http://robertanddpm.blogspot.com

Cmd biee service windows left only one after win. cumulative security patch

Customer (3-5456748787) reported that the cmd obiee service windows left only one (instead of the usual two) after applying window cumulative security patches.
No change was made to the shortcut Start BI Services and they like to find out why they are getting one cmd window now.
Customer installed the 11115 environment using Simple Install option.
Everything else is working fine as normal. Any idea why and what caused the cmd window to disappear?
I can't find vcap image for 11115 Simple Install option. Anyone has one environment that I can verify this?
Thanks
Teik

Hi Teik,
I could not check this as I do not have any environment at the moment, but I think this is due to the changes in the 11.1.1.5 installation modes.
If I am right, the "Start BI Services" through the windows start menu, starts the BI weblogic servers and then the opmn and the nqserver processes. In 11.1.1.5 Simple mode, there is only one weblogic server (Admin Server) and there is only one command window.
I am sorry if I got this wrong.
Hope this helps.
Thank you,
Dhar

Setup more than one ethernet interface

Hi,
On a 10.5.2 server, I have 4 ethernet ports, 2 on Lan and 2 on Wan with public IP.
What I am suposed to do first :
1- Setup 1 lan interface, DNS, others interfaces an d thne services
2- Setup 4 interfces, Dns, Services
3- Other
Services planned on that Xserve : DNS, OD, Ical, VPN, MAil, Web.
Thank's four your help
Eric Sudan

Thank's for your response servantofserver,
I'll have an internal DSN, so I'am not sure of one thing :
What ethernet interface is suposed to be the "primary" ?
One of the lan, or one of the wan ?
Can it be changed later, changing the order by drag and drop ?, need to use changeip ?
Thank's
Eric

"securely" use one ethernet interface for WAN and other for the LAN

I am reconfiguring our dual 2.7 Intel Xserve running MacOSXServer 10.5.4, and had a question.
Is it possible (or advisable) to use en0 to perform LAN services, and then configure en1 to only allow access to very limited service. VPN, FTP, CALDAV and later Mail.
I imagine that this is possible via a firewall configuration, but first I do not know how to specify interface in addition to ports, and second I don't know how advisable this would be.
Currently I have a DSL package from ATT with 5 static IP addresses. I have an Airport Extreme set up as one of those addresses providing DHCP and NAT to the LAN. I am using the LAN ports on the back of that to bridge my three switches (2 managed [clients and oce print server 100 base-T] and 1 unmanaged [ laser printers and copier 10 base-T]).
I have the LAN based on 192.168.0.x, with the Xserve at 192.168.0.5. I have DNS configured and working (Thank you Antonio Rocco)
I have 20 LAN clients, 18 mac 1 PC and one PC via Parallels. I will have no more than 1 or 2 WAN clients at any one time
I provide AFP, SMB, Directory Services currently. As part of the reconfigure, I desire to take better advantage of the collaboration tools to provide wikis and CALDAV services. I also want to allow our employees to publish their individual calendars, so that they can subscribe to them at home, or vice versa.
I would like to configure VPN, one for me to access configurations when I am away using Remote Desktop (I have used command line to some extent, but still feel more comfortable with the GUI tools) and second for limited access to content for certain users.
It would also be very helpful for us to have a FTP site. It is unnecessary for this the be a FQDN service, sending the IP address is perfectly acceptable as we only use a service like this 10-15 times a year.
(Related but unimportant in the grand scheme, is there a way to generate a link to the FTP server that you could email that not only is a link, but also a temporary username and password?)
Thank you in advance,
Ion Webster

First, I missed a zero in the network speeds, I have two managed GbE switches that have all of the GbE capable machines connected to them, and an unmanaged GbE switch that has all the 10 or 100Base-T connections. My apologies for the mistake. That was one of the reasons I went with the GbE capable Airport to bridge the switches.
Ok, I had been leaning towards a separate hardware firewall, but here is also where there is a hole in my knowledge. Do I need to look at something like the Linksys RVS4000 which bills itself as a +"4-Port Gigabit Security Router with VPN. Secure, smart Gigabit networking for growing business"+ I would like easy configuration, as I take care of these systems in addition to my job, rather than full time. This will be the first time I have set up a VPN connection, so even though I have spent a lot of time researching the manuals, and reading Schoun Regan (Apple Training Series) I don't have real world experience here. So if I buy more hardware, I want it to be the product that will provide the protection, and also allow me to configure it so that I can get these services running. All my VPN clients are running Macs, most on an AIrport connection and have their IP ranges in the 10.0.1.x range. all but one is on OS 10.5.x so I have a fairly homogeneous set of machines to make work together.
I will review the links you provided regarding static routing, but I do believe the hardware solution is a better one, and wish to pursue it, for all the reasons you give, and that in the brief perusal of the links, it is more than I want to tackle.
As far as FTP vs sFTP, I have no preference. I simply want a way to have online storage for transfer of large files on occasion. Ideally I want a folder, or a series of folders that are accessible for my LAN users to put items in and take them out, and for my (s)FTP users to do the same
So long story short, the hardware solution I would like to purchase, I need to be able to do the following:
VPN connections for content access and ARD access ( knew about and will ensure differing IP ranges)
(s)FTP
Calendar publishing
mail(at a later time)
Thank you for your help thus far.
Ion Webster

Is it fair to pay for one year service and get only one trial?

Why am I only allowed to convert one file from PDF to Word when I have paid a whole year's subscription (US$19.99) to do just that?

OK, So after waiting on hold on the phone for an hour and getting mad I got ahold of someone here on live chat and got disconnected but have an answer for everyone and a solution! Here it is so you don't have to go through the same thing,
It takes 24-48 hours for your payment to clear in order for you to be able to use the program. (I told them it should clearly state this on there)
Then I asked if there was a way to get one or two more conversions for now and was told to use the 30 day FREE trial version of "Acrobat XI Pro" I was told by adobe customer service just now that this has the same thing included in it.
So if you only needed it temporarily you can get a full refund for "ExportPDF" within 30 days of original purchase sine you can use "Acrobat XI Pro" FREE 30 trial version anyways
Good luck everyone. I still say we all complain about not being notified about the waiting period to use our PAID software though

Netctl: Using same ethernet interface for PPPoE and LAN

Configuration overview
One ethernet interface connected to a switch which has both the LAN and my ADSL router (running in bridge mode).
My Arch PC should connect via PPPoE (possibly multiple connections) to the ISP and be able to access the LAN simultaniously. (Connection sharing is another goal, but that is not yet relevant...)
The main reason for not changing the setup is that some other people on the LAN use their own ISP accounts over the same line.
I currently have two netctl profiles, adsl (PPPoE) and ethernet (LAN).
I also want the ability to run two PPPoE sessions simultaniously (with routing to determine which data uses which connection). (This is not currently relevant, but have been in the past and might be again in the future...)
The problem:
I'm unable to connect to both the ethernet and ADSL profiles simultaniosly.
I tried to switch to Network manager, but it has a known bug preventing the same interface from being used for both plain LAN and PPPoE.
The workaround that currently seem to work, is to use ifconfig to manually add an IPv4 address to the ethernet interface after connecting the PPPoE session.
The systax for a PPP profile also have the unusual feature that its "Interface" value refers to the underlying interface, rather than the created PPP interface.
I currently have it working on my Ubuntu HDD and previusly had it working on Gentoo.
(Under a standard Windows XP / 7, it works with a single connection, but multiple simultanious PPPoE connections require soem non-standard tools...)
The Ubuntu setup
eth0 is set up by NetworkManager (I didn't have the option to avoid that one...) and I have the PPPoE connections configured in my /etc/interfaces: (ppp0 is not currently in use, was previously)
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
iface ppp0 inet ppp
pre-up /sbin/ifconfig eth0 up # line maintained by pppoeconf
provider dsl-provider-local
auto ppp1
iface ppp1 inet ppp
pre-up /sbin/ifconfig eth0 up # line maintained by pppoeconf
provider dsl-provider-intl
I then have these files under /etc/ppp/peers: (with the name mathing the "provider" line) An example below. (passwords are in the /etc/ppp/*-secrets files)
unit 0 # This specifies that the created connection uses ppp0, differs in others.
noipdefault
hide-password
noauth
persist
plugin rp-pppoe.so eth0
user "myuser@radius-domain"
Arch setup:
ADSL profile:
Description='ISPName'
Interface=enp4s0
Connection=pppoe
User='username@radius-server'
Password='mysecret'
ConnectionMode='persist'
#UsePeerDNS=true
# Override default LCP parameters from /etc/ppp/options
LCPEchoInterval=15
LCPEchoFailure=10
Ethernet profile:
Description='A basic static ethernet connection'
Interface=enp4s0
Connection=ethernet
IP=static
Address=('192.168.0.8/24')
Solutions / Workarounds
1. Manually configuring a IP after connecting PPPoE
2. Not using netctl for pppoe, rather using the pppoe-setup tool
3, Figuring out the correct netctl setup for this scenario - which is what I need your help for...
Possibly related links
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=163956
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sh … Connection - Insists that an extra interface is needed for sharing connections - which is not a fundemental Linux requirement

I used to use ubuntu & if you reboot into it (if you can) & run:
$ ifconfig
you will see eth0 & ppp1
ppp1 will be set as the default gateway.
Your issue in Arch is that you currently want the PPPoE interface to be the same as your LAN, this will not work at best you will need to bridge the 2 BUT I think what you should do is use the networkmanager profile as a guide & have netctl create an adsl interface called ppp1 & set that as the default gateway
thus:
Description='ISPName'
Interface=ppp1
Connection=pppoe
User='username@radius-server'
Password='mysecret'
ConnectionMode='persist'
#UsePeerDNS=true
# Override default LCP parameters from /etc/ppp/options
LCPEchoInterval=15
LCPEchoFailure=10
I think this will work, try it & good luck
PS:
I do not use netctl as I use dhcp but you might even be able to configure netctl to set ppp1 as default gateway as a "post-up" command OR just create a systemd service to do it after the relevant netctl services are up
Last edited by t0m5k1 (2013-06-18 17:56:02)

Creation of one outbound interface for two diferent senders

helo.
i just want to conform ont thing that .
my scenario is two diferent files from 2 diferent business systems are sending to one Rfc.
so i was created only one outbound interface for both senders and one message type bcos the file structure is same for both senders.
so is there any thing wrong in creating only one datatype,message type,message interface for both senders.
waiting for your response.
cheers.
seeta ram.

Hi Ram,
That is perfectly correct when you have two senders and one receiver Scenario and <b>Business Service is different</b>. Then you can use the same Interface.
Just keep in mind that the key for XI to recognise the Right interface is combination of these 3 parameters:
Sender Service, Sender Interface and Namespace. These cannot be duplicated.
When the Message type is same in the sender input data then you can create just one Message Type and One Data type and RFC is anyhow the imported RFC which you need not have to worry.
In Configuration Scenario you need to configure separately the RD, ID, CC and Agreements for the Interfaces.
Hope this answers your query. Let us know if you need anymore clarification
Thanks
Srini

Sharing one ethernet cable with two macs using a USB Ethernet Adaptor

I have two computers running Mac OS 10.6 but only one ethernet cable in my office. One ethernet cable goes from the wall to Mac #1. I have a cisco USB Ethernet Adaptor USB300M that I like to use as OUTGOING ethernet cable from Mac #1 to plug into Mac #2. Does anybody know how this works? Simply plugging it in does not work. Thanks for any suggestions!

If either of these computers is a Mac Pro (65 lb.) tower, all of which have two Ethernet jacks, Internet sharing is crisply supported with any additional Hardware. Cable the wall jack Ethernet to the first Ethernet port, then cable the second Ethernet port to the second Mac. Configuration is described in this article:
Mac OS X 10.6 Help: Sharing your Internet connection

EJB3 - More than one remote interface for Session Bean?

Hi,
Is it possible in EJB3 to have more than one remote interface for a SessionBean?
I have seen it posetd on here that it is possible but never been able to find any other information.
Using JBoss as my App Server, I have deployed an App, where a SessionBean is defined as implementing 2 interfaces, both of which are annotated using @remote.
However when I examine the JBoss JMX Console, Global JNDI Namespace only one remote interface is listed, and indeed it is the first one defined in the SessionBean.
Considering I use a String similar to (MyApp/MyBean/remote) to do the JNDI lookup, this would indicate that it is not possible to have more than one remote interface.
1. Is this a JBoss specific limitation?
2. Is there another way of performing the JNDI lookup?
Thanks,
Alan.

Hi,
Thanks for prompt response! I tried the suggestion in my application, and the output from JBoss JMX Console was
+- XXXBean (class: org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContext)
| | +- remote (proxy: $Proxy291 implements No ClassLoaders found for: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.Remote1 (no security manager: RMI class loader disabled))Again only displaying the remote interface that is first in the @remote ({ Remote1.class , Remote2.class}) list. This would lead me to believe that JBoss does not support this.
Can anyone confirm this?
Alan.

How to display events of only one IPS in Security Monitor?

Hello,
i searched the forum with no result. I have CW 2.2 with IDSMC 2.1. I got two IPS and 2 IDSM-2 (4.x is in production / 5.x is in test) which have all their four interfaces sniffing in different network segments. Now i am flooded by the thousands of messages from the internet with no possibilty to just concentrate my view on the events generated on only one special interface of a single IPS.
To temporarily focus only one one interface of a single IPS how can i filter the events in Security Monitor to only display the events of a this device and a single interface?
This would be extremly helpfull for to simulate attacks in an test environment with shuning/blocking. I have rare possiblities to set up a second CW IDSMC on another machine. And after all, i would appreciate to focus (filter) in that way for later examining my network to tune signatures and events.
Furthermore, on IEV 4.1 i was able to get a real time dashboard showing 'real time' events. I did not see this functionality for IPS 5.x and IDSMC. How can i view real time data there to see my networks reaction to simulated attacks.
Any ideas how to only display only wanted data in Security-Monitor?
Thanks in advance, Gerhard

As far as I know, you cannot display the events of only one IPS in Sec Mon.

How to use Mac Mini Server as NAT with only one port??

How to use Mac Mini Server as NAT with only one ethernet port??

But why did apple sell me this server that does NAT with one port? I don't get it.

Bridge static IP using only one interface

Hi All,
I started a thread yesterday at serverfault, without much luck so far http://serverfault.com/questions/510361 … ly-one-nic
So the problem is that I have a bridged interface configured (br0) which bridges two physical interfaces (eth1/eth2) - bridging works as expected and packets traverse through the bridge properly. My problem comes from a static IP address configured on the bridge:
br0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1488
inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 broadcast 10.255.255.255
ether 00:24:9b:04:3b:a7 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)
RX packets 3623 bytes 332062 (324.2 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 1494 bytes 154380 (150.7 KiB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
Now the problem is that depending on which interface was added last into the bridge, I see arp requests coming FROM the bridge box on only one of them. Lets say I do:
#brctl addif br0 eth1
#brctl addif br0 eth2
and then ping 10.0.1.101 - I will see arp requests coming on br0 and eth2, but not on eth1 - obviously that is an issue - since I would expect bridge IP to be seen equally from both eth1 and eth2 sides - am I missing something? Is there a way to fix this?
Thanks

Yes. Just configure a static IP address instead of DHCP on the computer/device.
Linksys routers usually don't have any option to assign static IP addresses through DHCP. You have to configure it on the computer.

VPLS (ATM-Ethernet) using only one circuit in the main ethernet site

Hi Everybody
We are needing to connect the following topology in our MPLS net:
The main site connects to the net through an Ethernet circuit and the remote sites are connected through ATM circuits. we need to use only one vlan in the main site. It is possible to connect this topoligy using only one vlan in the main site through VLPS? or pseudowires? which other solution can we use to solve this problem?
thanks a lot.

I understand your best option will be to run AToM/L2VPN internetworking and have a PVC from a remote locate to be "internetworked" to a sub-interfaces (representing a vlan) at the central site which have an Ethernet connection.
Take a look at this example:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/wan/configuration/guide/wan_l2vpn_iwkg_ps6922_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1055162
HTH,
-W

Service binded on only one ethernet interface

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for