Service scenario Freight condition value is not pick up in Service entry sh

Hi,
I have done Service PO and assigned freight condition in header level as amount 100 and complete the service PO, then we have done service entry sheet wrt Service PO and check in GRN detail we are not getting the Freight value in as 100 separately.
i am using freight condition as YDFR as delivery cost indicator B assigned.
User required in freight value in GRN and secondly it is comming in Normal GRN its not showing in service.
please suggest me
Thanks
Shital

Hi,
This is clients requirement and we have upgraded in R/3 4.7 to ECC 6.0 so same thing working in R3 4.7.
so we put freight value as header level in PO and complete the service entry sheet and check the FI doc we didnot get the separate freight amountor not added in also. we get only base value as 1000 not get 100 freight amount. in R3 4.7 it is showing separately
we need this please guide me.
Thanks
Shital

Similar Messages

Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation

Hi All,
I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
Actual Issue:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
Can anybody solve this issue!
What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi All,
Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
Working:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
Actual Issue:
When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
tax value is not picked .
I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
What can be the issue over here!
Can anybody give me solution for the same!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Condition Value is not updated

Hi All,
I am using bill of services, so i have a sales order and as a subsequent document a service entry sheet, my invoice is created with reference to the service entry sheet.
In my price procedure i have a percentage guarantee condition.
In the sales order i insert a percentage for the condition, afterwards i create a service entry sheet with reference to the sales order and all the conditions values are copied correctly, till here everything ok.
In the SES i change the guarantee condition value and then i create the invoice, but the guarantee condition value is not updated and takes the value i inserted before in the sales order.
I already tried to change the condition copy control but no sucess.
Anyone can help me with this issue??
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Tiago Ferreira

Hi Madhu,
Here is my code:
    SALES_CONDITIONS_IN-ITM_NUMBER = I_UPLOAD-ITMNUMBER.
    SALES_CONDITIONS_IN-COND_TYPE = I_UPLOAD-COND_TYPE.
    SALES_CONDITIONS_IN-COND_VALUE = I_UPLOAD-COND_VALUE / 10.
    APPEND SALES_CONDITIONS_IN.
    CLEAR SALES_CONDITIONS_IN.
    SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-ITM_NUMBER = I_UPLOAD-ITMNUMBER.
    SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-COND_TYPE = I_UPLOAD-COND_TYPE.
    SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-UPDATEFLAG = 'U'.
    SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-COND_VALUE = 'X'.
    APPEND SALES_CONDITIONS_INX.
    CLEAR SALES_CONDITIONS_INX.
I am just creating a CMR with reference to billing document. Its creating condition recod 'ZAP0' correctly, which i am passing manally. But, its not populating condition value to levy condition it should determine automatically.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Srikanth.

Excise base value is not picking for Imports

Dear All,
     Excise base value is not picking for Imports when doing MIGO and BED/E CESS/S&H E CESS also not picking.
          Please suggest me
Thanks,
Tiru

Hi,
In case of Imports, you have to define following condiiton types in MM Pricing Procedure;
JCDB     IN:Basic Custom Duty
JCV1     IN : CVD
JECV     IN : Ed Cess on CVD
J1CV     IN : H&SECess on CVD
JEDB     IN : Ed Cess on BCD
JSDB     IN : H&SECess on BCD
JADC     Addnl Duty of Custom
These should be created as a delivery cost condition in M/06. And assign the accruals to these in M/08.
Folowing Gl Accounts will be assigned to those accruals in OBYC;
CVD Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCV1, JECV, J1CV, JADC) and Customs Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCDB, JEDB, JSDB)
Now follow the below procedure for Import Purchase;
1. ME21N u2013 Create Import Purchase Order (Here assign the Vendor of Customs Office to the above mentioned 7 condition types in "Details" of "Conditions")
2. MIRO u2013 Enter Customs Invoice w.r.t. Import PO (Here select "Planned Delivery Cost" and do LIV for Customs office Vendor, enter values for duties as per Bill of Entry manullay during LIV)
3. J1IEX u2013 Capture Bill of Entry
4. MIGO u2013 Goods Receipt against Import PO
5. J1IEX u2013 Post Bill of Entry
6. MIRO u2013 Enter Vendor Invoice
7. MIRO u2013 Enter Clearing Agentu2019s Invoice

Condition value is not displaying in sales order

Hi Friends,
when i am creating sales order, condition type(JEXP,JECP,JA1X..) is displaying in cond.type column and percentage(14%,2%,1%) is displaying in amount column and
the condition value is not displaying in cond. value column in conitions tab of sales order.
In analysis it is showing as condition record found...
please help me...
with regards

Hi,
can it be that you have a problem with units of measure? Often, if there is no value in Condition value, the problem is in the master data of material. Did you use standard schema? If you not, have you tried it with standard schema? What is your value under "per" and "UoM"?
Regards Thomas

Basic Excise duty condition value is not captured in in Excise tab at GR

Dear Experts
i am facing the problem that, Basic excise duty amount is not appearing / captured in Excise tab, Goods Receipt Screen.
Please guide me on whether the problem is with Excise master data or excise configuration.

Dear friend,
please check the your maintained in fv11 or not for the bed, ecess, and secess, and set offs if your using the taxinn procedure
or in case of your using the taxinj at the time for taxcode for the conditions your maintained condition values or not
and again in j1id excise rates your maintained or not check for the particular chapterid of that material
i think this will help you
Regards
Pramod

Condition value is not updating in shipment cost documents.

We are creating a shipment cost document and condition value is not updating automatically when we enter the amount.
Regards,
Jagadeesh

Dears,
The material master of the material is not maintained with gross weight and net weight, hence automatic updation for condition value is not taking place, i resolved the issue.
Thanks,
Jagadeesh

Header Freight Condition Value to be Spread at Item Level

Dear All,
There is an issue i am facing.
We have a freight condition (header level) in a Stock Transport Order
There are say 6 line items in the STO. The functional requirement is that the Header Freight Condition Value has to be inventorised on the line items in ratio of their value. Also the header freight amount should get spread only on specific line items ( say of a particular material type )
Please help me with this issue.
Regards,
Adams P

Dear RamShiva,
I think below forum document will resolve your issue.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-43356
Regards,
Haresh Panara

Excise value are not pick

hi experts
hi i have a problem while doing billing document against sales order and outbound delievery excise values are not pick by the system.but in the sales order it is showing . please help to resolve this issue ..

Dear Farhan,
Just take a help of an SD consultant it is a matter of 2 min for him to solve this issue.
still Go to tcode VTFL
and search for your delivery type and your billing type and double click on the same,
2.Then you will have an item folder on the left side click on that and you will get the list of all item category.
3. Double click your item category YP05 and on the right side lower end you will get the Price type - in that enter "D" instead of "G"
and Save it. then transport it to your quality and do the sales order process again.
REgards,
Sudhir

Error 1297 A privilege that the service requires to function properly does not exist in the service account configuration

When I try to start Windows installer in Services.msc, it gives me this error Error 1297 A privilege that the service requires to function properly does not exist in the service account configuration. How do I fix this? I am running Windows 7 ultimate.

Hi,
Based on the error code, we can use the Services Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in (services.msc) and the Local Security Settings MMC snap-in (secpol.msc) to view
the service configuration and the account configuration for Windows Installer service.
Besides, the following two threads focus on the similar issue and can be referred to as reference.
Error 1297: "ERROR_INCOMPATIBLE_SERVICE_PRIVILEGE 1297” FTP service in Windows 7 computer
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/52329b48-1ba9-4cab-a6b2-efd8db173625/error-1297-errorincompatibleserviceprivilege-1297-ftp-service-in-windows-7-computer?forum=w7itpronetworking
Service fails to start, error 1297 and 7000
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/419ba006-4413-4036-8c49-252b08593131/service-fails-to-start-error-1297-and-7000?forum=winserverDS
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Frank Shen

Condition Type JSRT not picking Condition Base Value in Pricing Procedure

Hi Friends,
In a procedure System is not picking condition base value for condition type JSRT. I have checked the tax procedure and found alternative Cal Type is 17 and is working fine for Domestic vendors.
Friends i need your help in sorting out this issue. Pls suggest what I can check in order to sort out this issue.
Rgds, Krishan Raheja

Hello!
In TAXINN the base value for the condition JSRT is picked up from step 100.
I suggest that you change the "From" value to 100 instead of whatever you may be using
Then test the transaction once again.This will not affect your normal service tax calculation either. So please make this change & try using S1 for planned delivery cost.
Hope this helps !
Cheers!
Plauto
Edited by: Plauto Abreu on Feb 11, 2011 9:03 PM

SRV: pricing condition not picked up in service confirmation

Hi gurus,
We maintained the service scenario with R/3 billing, and using service contracts. When we enter a service order,
the contract is determined, and discounts (on spare parts) are taken into the pricing. When copying the item
to the confirmation, the discount is copied as well. So far everything works as desired.
However, when entering a spare part directly into the confirmation, the discount is not taken into pricing. Contract determination works fine. So the contract is determined, but the discount is not found.
Please help us solving this matter.
regards,
Wim Olieman

Hi,
Please check the Copy conditions tick in the SPRO path for Copy control for item categories between the contract item and the confirmation item for spare parts.
Regards,
PP

Freight condition value modify after reverse GR

Hi
I have done PO with freight condition FR1 and done GR again i reverse GR now i want to change my PO freight value but system is not allowed, in Config i have removed Dlivery cost B in Condition type now it will work but i want to know this is correct way or not or any other option.
What is use of Delivery cost B in PO,GR or MIRO, please explain this
Please suggest solution
Thanks
Shital D

Hi,
I have created two POs with & with out the config option : Delivery Costs - B. But in both the cases, the system does not allow the change in the freight percentage FRA1. For standard conditions like FRA1, the control will be entirely throgh the backend program. If you need to work with configuration/control data of the condition type, please create Z-condition by copying the std condition and try to change the control data.
thanks & regards
Chaitanya Rayaprolu

R/3 ZCOND values are not picked properly in BW

We had a issue in one of the BW Reports. There are three types of discounts offered in the sales, namely Hospital Discount, Market Discount & Pharmacy Discount.
For certain billing document nos, the R/3 and BW values were not matching. However, the Net Amount is matching.
There is a table by the name ZVBW_PRICE_COND which is a view created out of the tables VBRK, VBRP & ZSBW_PRICE_COND.
In R/3, we put the POSNR value (Billing Item) and BELNR value (Billing Doc no.) to generate KNUMV value (Number of Document Condition) and KSCHL values.
In the KONV table, we put the KPOSN (Condition Item no.) = 10, KNUMV value and KSCHL value (Condition Type) to get the Condition value.
The value generated was ok and were same as that of vf03.
Now we checked the Data source 2LIS_13_VDITM and its extract structure.
Here we found Field only in Customer Exit checkbox ticked for ZCOND1 to 4.
However, in BW, there are specific Infoobjects like Condition Value1,2,3,& 4 each of which is directly mapped to ZCOND1,2,3,& 4 respectively.
Hospital Discount and Market Discount are mapped to ZCOND3 & ZCOND2 respectively in the concerned report.
I could have remove the ticks in the checkbox and make ZCOND accesible to extractor. But problem is that it is only certain billing doc nos for which discounts are not matching. Any help will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Surajit

Hi,
This checkbox is set for those fields of the datasource(in rsa6) which are custom fields,and whose values are determined by a user-exit written in tcode CMOD.
We have observed that keeping this checkbox ticked or unticked does not make any difference at all.So even removing this checkbox for your 4 fields will not solve the mismatch issue.
The mapping for the 4 fields in your case,is already there in BW.
Please go to tcode CMOD,enter the BW project name,select components and click on display.4 user exits will be displayed.
1st is for TD datasources,2nd for master data attr,and next are for text and hierarchies.
Double click on 1st exit FM,then double click on the include program,and find the exit code written for your datasource.Most probably user-exit not working OK.
cheers,
Vishvesh

Condition Value should not effect on Material Price

Dear All
I have created one condition ZLOC - Local Conveyance ( At header Level & Positive ) and assigned in pricing procedure. But while making PO if i put some value against ZLOC condition its effect on my Net Price of Each Item. Price is getting Increased in respective their Quentity Ratio.
E. G ( Before puting ZLOC )
Material No                         Po Qty                       Price
1500000030                           10                            200
1500000031                             1                            100
After Putting ZLOC = 100 at header level
1500000030                           10                            210
1500000031                             1                            200
I want Per Price Should be remain same & Local Conveyane should be added in Net Amount.
Thanks & Regards

HI
CHANGE UR CALCULATION SCHEMA
u have to frame ur schema as per ur requirement
now for ur case make the entry of this condition at last
create a normal pricing procedure then just after last condition give this condition and try
the procedure will be something like this
base amount
excise
cess
hcess
TOTAL
discount (if any ,u can have this condition after base amount also )
freight
total value
ZLOC - Local Conveyance
FINAL total
regards
KI

Service scenario Freight condition value is not pick up in Service entry sh

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for