Service tax value required updating while posting GR in MIGO transaction

Dear Friends,
We have a following scenario where service tax value required updating while posting Goods Receipt MIGO transaction.
1. Purchase Order created for first line item where Qty. 1 and Net Rate Rs.1000/- so total Gross value will be Rs.1000/- example Vendor XYZ
2. Freight condition type maintained for the first line item for Rs.500/- and assigned to Transportation vendor ABC.
3. When Goods Receipt Posted for the Material against PO first line item, the material value updates Rs.1500/- (Material value as
    per PO + Freight Charges)
4. After posting GR while making Invoice verification through MIRO transaction against the PO GR/IR clearance will be done for
    Material vendor XYZ. For transportation Vendor ABC Planned delivery cost indicator will be select and since service tax is
    applicable Service tax code will also select.
Here the values of Service tax if the Material available in Stock it will be inventories. If stock consumed before making the Invoice verification for Transportation vendor ABC, then the Service tax values update to PRD account.
We know that in PO, tax code can be select for first line item (Raw Material) Vendor XYZ and if transportation charge condition type maintained for same first line item and assigned to Vendor ABC and there is no provision to maintain Service tax. So the service tax will get inventories while posting Invoice Verification for the transportation vendor.
We want the values of Service tax to update while posting Goods Receipt in MIGO transaction.
Thanks & regards
Dhanu

hi,
Please note at the time of MIGO Servecie tax value does not appear, it will appear at the tiem of Invoice only.
Regards,
Rama Mohan Bangaru

Similar Messages

Want to assign output type while posting document in MIGO

Hi All,
I want to assign output type(WEE1) while posting document in MIGO txn.
It can be done through configuration but it won't apply in my case as I have some conditions to put as well.
If anybody could suggest for any User Exits/BADI/Enhancement spots for the same would be of great help.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi
There are many reasons why an update could be terminated, not
just
number ranges.
Go to transaction SM13.
Enter the date and user ID if known and find your transaction that was
terminated. Drill-down until you find which function (line) caused the
termination and double click. That should help you determine why the update failed.
update was terminated
regards
kunal
Edited by: kunal ingale on Nov 7, 2008 7:03 AM

Problem in Posting Document through MIGO transaction

I am posting goods in MIGO transaction.When the goods are posted tables MSEG(Document Segment: Material) and table MKPF(Header Table for material) are getting updated for the new material.My requirement is to update the table QALS and QAVE with the new batch number getting updated in MSEG table.I have to fetch some data(Inspection Lot Number) from these tables.

Hi,
You can find data in these tables when quality checking is done, these needs to be set by functional consultants.
Chekc your process if any Inspection lots size is defined for each each goods movement at all, if not these tables will not be populated at all.
Regds,
Mano Sri

Excise amount not updating while posting invoice

Dear SCN's,
I have done GRN and captured excise amount and later in invoice posting these captured excise values are not updating. Please help me out where the root cause might be, please share your views were might be the error. And also help me with information of excise tables updating while capturing excise invoice and posting excise invoice.
Regards,
Kumar

For Domestic & Imports Excisable Material Procurement at Excisable Manufacturing Plant
J_1IEXCHDR: Table for Excise header information.
J_1IEXCDTL: Table for Excise item information.
J_1IGRXREF: Table for Excise & Material document reference.
J_1IPART1: Table for Part I entry
J_1IPART2: Table for Part II entry.
For Domestic & Imports Excisable Material Procurement at Excisable Depot
J_1IEXCHDR: Table for Excise header information.
J_1IEXCDTL: Table for Excise item information.
J_1IRG23D : Table for Depot Register.

Acquistion Value Negative in Area 01 while posting Goods Receipt (MIGO)

While posting a Goods Receipt am facing the error Acquistion Value Negative in Area 01.
The related Purchasing Document has an Account Assignment as AUC.
I have checked the Asset Master of that AUC. In the Depreciation Areas Tab when I am
trying to put the negative values allowed, it says that E669 Fiscal year 2009 is already closed in Financial Accounting.
Practically it is not possible for me to open the fical year 2009 in Financial Accounting since our Fiscal Year Variant is V3(April-March) and we currently in the period
05/2010.
Point to be considered is that Year end closing for Fixed Assets (AJAB) for 2008 is complete and year 2009 for Fixed Assets should ideally be open.
Please let me how to handle the situation without opening the closed Fiscal Year in Financial Accounting.
Regards
Gemini

Gemini,
First set your COD with OAPL.
Go to OADB and choose all values allowed for acquisition value under management of values for your effected dep area.
SAVE and import these settings to your production system and post your GRN.
Thanks,
Srinu

Service Tax reg No. in Invoice Posting

Hello Gurus,
When i post Invoice i am getting error message is enter service tax reg number for G/L account, Business Areaxxxx
Please advice me how can i resolve the problem
thanks in advance.
gopi.

i got solution.
gopi.

Posting Block in Migo transaction

Dear all,
please help me with this problem, I want user don't view price condition into migo transaction during a goods entry.
How must use authorization object or other strategies?
many thanks.
GV
Edited by: Gianluca Vinco on Oct 24, 2008 3:38 PM
Edited by: Gianluca Vinco on Oct 24, 2008 3:39 PM

not properly, we speak about purchase order data in "detail data" in migo.
About your note on migo_gr, in my system user that have migo_gr and go to "search PO" got error:
PO items rejected due to authorizations/selection
parameters
PO items rejected due to authorizations/selection parameters
if I block me23n I got this error message.
"Message no. ME422
Diagnosis
The selection of purchasing documents failed for the following reasons:
The system could not find any purchasing documents that matched the selection parameters and/or that can be used in this transaction
or
You do not have authorization to select purchasing documents.
Procedure
Choose different selection parameters
or
Ask for your authorization profile to be extended."
do you have updates about that?
Edited by: Gianluca Vinco on Oct 24, 2008 3:57 PM

Tax GL determination error while posting billing doc

Dear Experts
Am able to post billing documents into FI for a customer from a plant with out any errors. But for the same customer,sales invoice generated from different plant (both cases, plant region is same ), it is not taking proper tax GL accounts w.r.t. the state.
Can anybody suggest, the SPRO config steps to be checked while creating new plants, where there is a link for tax GL flow and plant/sales office
Thanks
Venugopal

Hi,
Go to OB40. Maintain the entry for EXD and relevant tax code whichi is used in your billing document. Also update the proper GL Account.
Regards,
Jigar

Tax statement item missing for tax code A0 - error while posting in MIRO

Hi,
At the time of MIRO, I am inserting P.O. and simulating the doc. However, at the time of posting the system is throwing the below mentioned error :
Tax statement item missing for tax code A0 (0% Input Tax)
Message no. FF805
Diagnosis
No tax item exists for tax code A0 in a G/L account item. A possible cause is an incorrect transfer of parameters by the application to the Accounting interface.
Procedure
Enter an OSS message.
Request you to help me resolving this error
Thanks in advance
Sagar
Edited by: Sagar Padhye on Nov 5, 2009 11:30 AM

Hey K.R.
a) Are you able to post transaction through Accounts payable using the same tax code ? - YES
b) in Miro are you able to use any other tax code and post the document ?- NO
I have created other tax code and tried to use it in MIRO, but system throwing the same message. Is it somehow related to Tax procedure / OSS pack levels?The message Type is ERROR.
Please confirm.
Thanks and Regards
Sagar
Edited by: Sagar Padhye on Nov 5, 2009 3:51 PM

Invoice Type not being Updated while Posting INVOIC01 - Incoming Invoice

Hello,
I am trying to Post Incoming Vendor Invoice in to SAP using INVOIC01 and IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM Function Module. I am adding values INVO for Invoice, CRMO for Credit Memo in the Field E1EDK01-BSART to Post the Invoice with different Invoice Types. However, the Invoice for the PO gets Posted only as Invoice, no matter what I populate in the Segment Field E1EDK01-BSART. What could be the issue? Please let me know.
Thank You,
Venkata Phani Prasad K.

This issue has been Resolved. A Sub routine MRM_DOCUMENT_COMPLETE is called in the Function Module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM in which the value of the USING Parameter MRM_RBKPV-TCODE is being hard coded to MR1M. Since I am using a Z-Version of this Function Module, I've changed the value of the above field to MIRO after the Subroutine call which solved the issue.
MRM_RBKPV-TCODE = 'MIRO'.
The Values to be Passed to the Field BSART in the Segment E1EDK01 are
E1EDK01-BSART = 'INVL' - For Invoice
E1EDK01-BSART = 'CRME' - For Credit Memo
Thanks,
Venkata Phani Prasad K

Freight Calculation while posting GR in MIGO

Hi Experts,
The following is the scenario :-
A Purchase Order is raised for procuring coal from the coal supplier. A freight condition is maintained in the Pricing Schema of the Coal Purchase Order. At the time of making a GR in MIGO a freight vendor is selected against the freight condition in the freight tab of the GR screen.
While doing MIRO we select the Purchase Order and Planned Delivery Cost, a pop up window populates the names of the coal supplier and transporter. On selection of the transporter the freight value is displayed and the freight invoice can be processed.
This is a normal scenario, but there is a penalty clause, that the transporter is allowed 0.5% tolerance on the weight of the coal supplied. Meaning if the Purchase Order is for 100 tonnes @ Rs. 10 per tonne, then the vendor has to supply atleast 99.5 tonnes to avoid penalty. Now suppose the vendor supplies only 90 tonnes of coal out of the 100 tonnes. He will be charged a penalty of 10 tonnes as follows :-
(10 tonnes x Rs. 10 per tonne) x 1.5 = Rs. 150/-.
Rs. 150/- will be deducted as penalty from the freight amount to be paid for 90 tonnes delivered.
The client wants that the system should automatically calculate the penalty and deduct the same from the freight amount at the time of posting the goods receipt so that the amount to be paid only is populated in the miro for invoice processing and the actual value of the freight paid is charged to the stock account.
Please suggest a BADI or user exit with which this can be done.
If it is not possible at the time of MIGO is there any user exit to automate this at the time of MIRO.
Thanks in advance.
AJ

Hi AJ,
Your requirement is very genuine, but system has its own limitations.
Suppose you have raised a PO for coal of 100 Ton of material.
And the vendor has supplied you only 50 Ton of material.
Then you make a Goods Receipt for the material (MIGO_PO).
Then while making GR, how can a system judge / calculate the transportation loss?
Secondly, although you have received lesser quantity of material due to transportation losses, still we need to post the quantity written in vendoru2019s invoice into our system, because we need to pay the vendor the amount of total coal dispatched from his location.
So, try to resolve the issue using your consulting skills.
Regards,

Error while posting downpayment documents in transaction f-53

Hi,
I am sending this mail once again as my earlier two messages was blocked by moderators. I don't know the reason for the same. I didn't used any mocky languages or abusing words. Normally the questions are blocked if the total no of postings are unmarked as 'answered' exceeds 10. But in my case it is not exceeded the limit. Any way I am posting the question once again, and I hope I will get some helpful support from SAP community network.
We have different company in our configurations and in some cases we were using same document types in different company codes. For easy tracking from this fiscal year onwards we assigned separate document types for individual company codes. When we use tcode f-53 or 5.58 in the initial screen after specifying company code and document type and the bank account , business area and vendor account in the next screen normally the open items for the given vendor should appear. but in our case it is giving error message f-5150 ' number range for the document type xx is not maintained for company code 'xxx' for this fiscal year 2009' and we are not albe to proceed. Please give any valid solutions for the same. I hope I didn't used any abusing words in this. I will explain the problem with an example given below.
doc type : xx in company code com1 ( number range defined)
doc type : zz in company code com2 ( number range defined)
suppose we are using these document types for the outgoing payments in two diffent company codes and we have common vendor v0001 for both.
now in tcode f-53 or f-58 if you are posting for the first company with doctype 'xx' and company com1 and if we specify vendor account, normally as per sap all the open items pertaining to the vendor / compnay code will display, but in our case it is displaying the next screen with an error stating that ' number range not defined for document type xx in company code COM2'
which is not correctl. In this screen we cannot change the company code to 'COM1' which is correct.
This is same in the case of customer and GL account.
How to solve this issue?
Regards
SK

Hi Dinesh,
Since you have same Vendor for your both the company codes and you have different document types for both company codes and you are posting payment for company code com1 for this number range you have maintained as per document type number object, but you are using same vendor for both company codes so if maintain number range for same number object for company code com2, system will pick company code com1 number range at the time of postings through company code com1, so maintain same number range objects number range against company code com2 to avoid inconsistency.
As per your given example you can check by posting through company code com2 with document type ZZ.

Deffered Tax Transfer - Service Tax Advance payment

Hi,
I have created two Tax codes for service tax S1 and S2 for interim and final. While receiving the advance payment I am using the final service tax code S2 and while posting the invoice i am using the interim service tax code S1. I am clearing the advance against invoice using the T.code F-39. When I am running the derrered tax transfer S_AC0_52000644 the system is not picking this partly paid (adjusted the advance) invoice. Both the tax codes are having more than one tax rate like base rate, edu.cess and H. edu.cess. I also created another tax codes I1 and I2 with one tax rate for all base rate, edu.cess and H edu.cess and while doing the above transactions the system is picking the document.
Could you please let me know what is the reason the system is not picking the document in the first case.
Advance thanks for your help and Regards
Koteswara Rao Padarti

hi...
please dont use a deffered tax code for down payments...
Raghav

Service Tax not updating in Table J_1ISERVC

Hi,
When i do Service Tax scenario, I have done the process from Sale Order and billing and other things. postings are made correctly. But the service tax values are not updating in Table J_1ISERVC
Because of this issues,we are not able to generate ST3 Report. Please provide me some inputs regarding this..
Thanks
Sasi Kanth

Hi,
For service Tax report, there is a report called ST3 but it is not yet implemented by SAP and still it is in testing. So, we need to develop an ALV report for Service tax from this Table.
That is the reason we need to update in this table. Kindly provide me few inputs.
Thanks

Badi/ User Exit - to update item data on Post GR in MIGO

Guyz,
I have a requirement to update the value in ALAN1 , ALAN2 fields while posting GR in MIGO. And also I need to access the value of realted PO (ebeln) and line item(ebelp) and equipment number(or serial number) EQUNR filed ,while doing the coding for this enhanemnet.
I was looking for Badi or User exit to meet the need. I have found a Badi MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI, which I have implemented. I have put a break in the method and found that I can access all the value in the above mentioned field (IS_GOITEM, is the sturcture in the Badi signature) but one problem still persists.
I can see only the last line item(ebelp), in IS_GOITEM, where I need to see all the line item, so that I can relate which Equnr is assigned to which Lineitem.
Please tell me if you know any badi or user exit for this purpose.
Regd,
Anid
Points Guranteed
Message was edited by:
Anid

Hi,
we have checked above BADI;s but will not suffice the requirement;
The requiement is
While Creating PO(ME21N) and Changing PO(ME22N):
When the user tries to Save the PO:
All the line items should be accessible and can be editable.
If the validation fails, error message should be displayed on
the screen and user should be able to edit at that location.
Please let me know if there is any other way or enhancement point for the same...
Regards
Shiva

Service tax value required updating while posting GR in MIGO transaction

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for