Set height=100% of a panelSplitter

Hi, I want to set the height of a panelSplitter to a 100% of tha page. In IE7 works fine, but it doesn't with Firefox 3.
Here's my css code:
af|panelSplitter {
border:0;
margin: 0 auto;
padding:0;
vertical-align: middle;
height:100%;
width:90%;
Any suggestion to make it work under FFox3??
Thanks.

In this thread they have solve it. Thank you for your help.
Re: [BUG?] "height:100%;" doesn't work for af:panelsplitter with firefox
I'll try to explain it easier anyway:
- In the CSS file:
.AFVisualRoot:dark {
background-image: url('/afr/m_bg_global.png');
background-repeat: repeat-y;
background-color: #0D4988;
color: #FFFFFF;
- Put panelSplitter into a panelStretchLayout
- Write on panelStretchLayout Syle Class at properties: AFVisualRoot
- At the panelSplitter InlineStyle: height:100%;
I think that might work ;)
Thanks!

Similar Messages

  • Need to set height to 100%

    I need to set a web page to be 100 width and 100% height.
    I've got the width ok, as it's easy, but the height just won't
    work.
    I've set a css style to 100% height, but in safari and
    firefox, it's only 20% or so of the open window. I have a 3x3 table
    with set heights on the top 2 and bottom 2 and I need the middle
    left (which has a background colour) to fill the depth of the page
    with the bottom 2 columns right at the bottom - I just can't see
    hotw to do this.
    CS3, mac osx 10.4.9
    thanks

    http://www.apptools.com/examples/tableheight.php
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
    - Template Triage!
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
    - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
    ==================
    "livingwithanangel" <[email protected]>
    wrote in message
    news:f0bejo$lkm$[email protected]..
    >I need to set a web page to be 100 width and 100% height.
    I've got the
    >width
    > ok, as it's easy, but the height just won't work.
    > I've set a css style to 100% height, but in safari and
    firefox, it's only
    > 20%
    > or so of the open window. I have a 3x3 table with set
    heights on the top 2
    > and
    > bottom 2 and I need the middle left (which has a
    background colour) to
    > fill the
    > depth of the page with the bottom 2 columns right at the
    bottom - I just
    > can't
    > see hotw to do this.
    >
    > CS3, mac osx 10.4.9
    > thanks
    >

  • Dynamically setting height to 100%

    How do you dynamically create a container/control and set
    it's height to 100% in ActionScript?
    control.height = 100% doesn't work

    control.percentHeight = 100;

  • Iframe not scrolling to content below set height in IE9

    Because iframe height of 100% didn't render correctly (in any browsers) I chose a set height (600px) in which to display my clients' property listings within one of their site pages.
    All works reasonably all tested browsers (double scroll bars in Chrome and Safari -- div and iframe -- despite that the div isn't set to have such, but I can likely fix that); IE9, though, is nonfunctional:  In IE9 I get a Y scrollbar, as defined, however it does not scroll past content that fits into 600 pixel iframe height.  That is, is does not scroll to show the rest of the iframe page.
    I have tried separately defining x and y scrollers as well as simply calling for scrolling in general; no luck.
    I have been searching for hours for a fix, and have tried every combination of style coding to the iframe itself as well as the overall style sheet (to the div).  I also read the soure for the page rendered in IE9, and the style coding was as I'd written it.
    It has to be a simple fix, or others would be having this IE9 issue, too, right?
    Have even added <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=8"> to the header; didn't change anything.
    Anyone know what is going on -- and how to fix it?
    I apologize for how jumbled both the CSS and source code is for this site.  If I were recreating the site today, I could do a much cleaner job.
    Here are a few tries:
    http://cbm1.com/retail_property_listings/costar.html
    http://cbm1.com/retail_property_listings/costar3.html
    This version (more info in the CSS, less inline) gets rid of the double scrollers in Safari and Chrome (while still working in FF) but still the same doesn't-scroll-beyond-the-600px-iframe-pane-height issue in IE9.  Tried moving the meta directive toward IE8 to immediately above the body tag as well as first meta tag on the page; neither resulted in any IE9 rendering change:
    http://cbm1.com/retail_property_listings/costar4.html
    Happy to simply paste the inline + CSS coding alone in this window, if that's easier for anyone.

    Because iframe height of 100% didn't render correctly (in any browsers) I chose a set height (600px) in which to display my clients' property listings within one of their site pages.
    All works reasonably all tested browsers (double scroll bars in Chrome and Safari -- div and iframe -- despite that the div isn't set to have such, but I can likely fix that); IE9, though, is nonfunctional:  In IE9 I get a Y scrollbar, as defined, however it does not scroll past content that fits into 600 pixel iframe height.  That is, is does not scroll to show the rest of the iframe page.
    I have tried separately defining x and y scrollers as well as simply calling for scrolling in general; no luck.
    I have been searching for hours for a fix, and have tried every combination of style coding to the iframe itself as well as the overall style sheet (to the div).  I also read the soure for the page rendered in IE9, and the style coding was as I'd written it.
    It has to be a simple fix, or others would be having this IE9 issue, too, right?
    Have even added <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=8"> to the header; didn't change anything.
    Anyone know what is going on -- and how to fix it?
    I apologize for how jumbled both the CSS and source code is for this site.  If I were recreating the site today, I could do a much cleaner job.
    Here are a few tries:
    http://cbm1.com/retail_property_listings/costar.html
    http://cbm1.com/retail_property_listings/costar3.html
    This version (more info in the CSS, less inline) gets rid of the double scrollers in Safari and Chrome (while still working in FF) but still the same doesn't-scroll-beyond-the-600px-iframe-pane-height issue in IE9.  Tried moving the meta directive toward IE8 to immediately above the body tag as well as first meta tag on the page; neither resulted in any IE9 rendering change:
    http://cbm1.com/retail_property_listings/costar4.html
    Happy to simply paste the inline + CSS coding alone in this window, if that's easier for anyone.

  • Workaround for the Firefox height="100%" bug

    Hi,
    Does anyone have a workaround / solution to the bug which affects Firefox which means you can't specify height=100% in the wrapper? The one which means you have to specify an absolute height.
    Maybe even better - does anyone know when it's getting fiex?
    Tks
    Alex

    The problem is that firefox browsers don't support percentage based heights. See...
    http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=Part2_DevApps_1.html
    If you set everything to 100% in your wrapper and set your app to 100% in the code it works fine (ie resizes) in every browser except firefox. It's not working correctly in firefox 3.5 either.

  • DW 8 - Table Height 100%

    What's the secret to get it to work?
    I have a table at the top of my site that contains a masthead
    graphic, below that - I have another table that I want to extend
    all the way down 100%. I have that table height set to 100% as I
    did when I had DW mx, but for some reason - it doesn't work now.
    I'm viewing the site on IE 7 and Firefox.
    Thanks

    Table height is not deprecated. It was never a part of the
    HMTL specs.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
    - Template Triage!
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
    - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
    ==================
    ": Nadia : ** Adobe Community Expert **"
    <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > That's because DWMX didn't use a valid doctype, so that
    it rendered pages
    > on non compatible browsers in quirks mode. Table height
    is not valid,
    > it's deprecated, but it can be made to work with a
    correct doc type... see
    > if this helps:
    >
    >
    http://apptools.com/examples/tableheight.php
    >
    > --
    > Nadia
    > Adobe® Community Expert : Dreamweaver
    > ----------------------------------------
    > CSS Templates |Tutorials |SEO Articles
    >
    http://www.DreamweaverResources.com
    > ~ Customisation Service Available ~
    >
    http://www.csstemplates.com.au
    > ----------------------------------------------------
    > Spry Widget Examples
    >
    http://www.dreamweaverresources.com/spry-widgets/
    > ----------------------------------------------------
    > ~ Forum Posting Guidelines ~
    >
    http://www.adobe.com/support/forums/guidelines.html
    > CSS Tutorials for Dreamweaver:
    >
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/css.html
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > "darone75" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> What's the secret to get it to work?
    >>
    >> I have a table at the top of my site that contains a
    masthead graphic,
    >> below
    >> that - I have another table that I want to extend
    all the way down 100%.
    >> I have
    >> that table height set to 100% as I did when I had DW
    mx, but for some
    >> reason -
    >> it doesn't work now. I'm viewing the site on IE 7
    and Firefox.
    >>
    >> Thanks
    >>
    >
    >

  • Group setting height to size of content, after having it set explicitly

    Hi
    I have a group like:
    <Group id="test" height="100">
    <button height="200" />
    </Group>
    Can I get the group, to have the size of the content, after having set the height explicitly?
    Regards
    Martin Andersen

    It seems that the default is actually 0 as demonstrated in this sample:
    <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
                   xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
                   creationComplete="init()">
        <fx:Script>
            <![CDATA[
                import mx.core.UIComponent;
                import spark.components.Group;
                private function init():void {
                    trace((new UIComponent()).height); // prints 0
                    trace((new Group()).height); // prints 0
            ]]>
        </fx:Script>
    </s:Application>

  • Height:100% is actually more than 100% of screen window??

    Hello,
    Here is a link to the page in question:
    www.aiwebsites.net/products
    I am trying to make the div with all the product descriptions
    size to height:100% of the users screen. Right now I have the body
    height set to 88% so that the main content will fit most screens
    pretty nicely, but it's not perfect by any means. If I size
    body:100% the scroll_content div gets too large. I would love to
    have the scroll_content div end at the bottom of the screen for
    each screen size and resolution. I know the reason for this glitch
    is some conflict with my padding or margin in my rather large
    stylesheet, but I just can't figure it out. Any help would be MUCH
    appreciated! Let me know if you can't see my css/html and I'll be
    glad to post it (I guess I'm assuming you all have the web
    developer extension for Firefox).

    .oO(daniel-son)
    >I hear what you all are saying, but I have already
    decided this is the best way
    >to display my content on this particular page. There are
    real reasons for this:
    There's hardly a reason to intentionally decrease a site's
    usability.
    I've already seen sites with 3 (three!) adjacent vertical
    scrollbars
    caused by such scrolling boxes. Can you imagine how stupid
    this looked
    and how bad it was to use?
    Your site also causes two vertical and one horizontal bar
    here. Two of
    them are totally unnecessary.
    > 1) the main reason being if people scroll down away from
    the "Estimate Widget"
    >and then add a product to their estimate, the most
    important aspect of my
    >website, the Estimate Widget, will be out of sight and
    not serving its purpose.
    >People won't see it updating and might click the "Add"
    button more than once,
    >or just might forget it's up there all together.
    There are other ways to keep such elements in place, even if
    the entire
    rest of the page is scrollable in a normal way. This is one
    of the rare
    situations where absolute positioning might be a helpful
    option.
    > 2) eventually I will have all many product descriptions
    on that one page,
    Very long pages should be split, which is much better than a
    tiny little
    hard-to-grab scrollbar slider.
    >making people "far" from all the important navigation
    links. Meaning there will
    >be no quick way to navigate all the products. [...]
    People are used to that. The [pos1] key exists and some sites
    even use
    links to jump back to the top/TOC. You're seeing a problem
    which isn't
    one really.
    > Basically, I need help on how to size the div properly,
    can anyone actually
    >help?
    That's the main problem with your approach, simply because it
    can't be
    done properly! It will always be either too small or too big.
    Another little thing: You don't have a background color
    defined for the
    page body. Not every browser uses white by default.
    Micha

  • RC Table with height=100% disappears

    Hi JDev gang
    Under JDev 11g TP2, I've an issue with the RC table control.
    I've dragged and dropped a VO data control onto my page and created an <af:table>. I've then placed the <af:table> inside an <af:panelCollection> with defaults values. If I change the panelCollection's height to 100%, at runtime the table does not render inside the browser. However if I set it to a pixel height it works fine.
    My code as follows:
    <af:panelCollection inlineStyle="height:100%;">
      <af:table ..... all the usual table attribute suspects>
      </af:table>
    </af:panelCollection>As a side note, setting the panelCollection's width = 100% works fine.
    Any idea what's going on?
    Regards,
    CM.

    Hi Chris,
    This is a common frustration I have seen with web browsers. Percentage based heights are not reliable.
    I see there is a release note that specifically addresses this at:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/htdocs/11tp/readme.html#faces2
    Scroll down to the "Page Layout Tips" section for a good explanation of how to avoid using percentage-based heights.
    Regards,
    Matt

  • Setting height for grid layout cell

    hai,
    i am creating my own layout for my framework page.i am using grid layout tag presents in htmlb.i want to set height for my grid layout cell using taglib but there is no height attribute as per i know.is there any way for that.....
    if anybody knows about it please tell me. if u have an sample code also please send me...
    regards,
    prasath

    Hi,
    Try the method setHeightPercentage in both GridLayout and GridLayoutCell classes.
    GridLayout result = new GridLayout();
    result.setHeightPercentage(100);
    Greetings,
    Praveen Gudapati
    [Points are welcome for helpful answers]

  • Width changed when droplet set to 100% of source

    I captured using firewire a source of HDV 1440 x 1080 24p in 60i from an HV20 into ProRes 422 HQ. The resulting file showed 1920 x 1080.
    I then used my droplet that I always use on HV20 HDMI 24p in 60i captures (not HDV, this skips the MPEG compression and gives true 1920 x 1080).
    For some reason, the resulting width from the droplet was 1440 x 1080 (even though the source file was 1920 x 1080 ProRes HQ.
    1. For HDV capture, as I'm 'reverse telecine'ing the clip anyway, do I lose any info if I capture it as HDV (is there a 1 to 1 byte transfer without transcoding) - and then transcode to ProRes HQ while 'reverse telecine'ing.
    2. Out of curiosity, why did it change the width back to 1440 when the source was 1920? I believe I recreate my droplet, and set it for fixed width of 1920 x 1080 - and this seemed to fix it.
    3. Should the pixel aspect ratio be 'default' or 'square'?
    4. Is there a way to open a droplet so that it can be edited?
    5. Here's my droplet setup (that messed up the width):
    File Extension: mov
    Estimated file size: unknown
    Audio: multi-track passthrough
    Video Encoder
    Format: QT
    Width: (100% of source)
    Height: (100% of source)
    Pixel aspect ratio: Default
    Crop: None
    Padding: None
    Frame rate: 23.976
    Frame Controls On:
    Retiming: (Fast) Nearest Frame
    Resize Filter: Linear Filter
    Deinterlace Filter: Reverse Telecine
    Adaptive Details: Off
    Antialias: 0
    Detail Level: 0
    Field Output: Progressive
    Codec Type: Apple ProRes 422 (HQ)
    Multi-pass: Off, frame reorder: Off
    Progressive
    Chroma filtering enabled
    Pixel depth: 24
    Spatial quality: 50
    Min. Spatial quality: 0
    Temporal quality: 0
    Min. temporal quality: 0

    Sounds like we have a very similar setup (HV30, HDMI capture, etc.).
    What you are seeing is pretty typical, and I don't think it has anything to do with your droplet. I have been looking for a consistent solution to this issue myself.
    Note that none of this should matter inside Final Cut, since FC will properly recognize the aspect ratio of the footage and show it properly. I only find this a problem if I am going through raw footage using Front Row or something like that.
    When you capture via HDMI, the input is true 1920x1080 and your pixel aspect ratio is 1:1.
    When you capture via firewire, the input is HDV 1440x1080 and your pixel aspect ratio is 0.75:1. Your initial capture files are marked to be shown at 1920x1080, and if you play them in Quicktime, they will show stretched as they should be. These files are not actually 1920x1080--they are just shown that way.
    Once you do your 60i to 24p reverse telecine in Compressor, the resultant files no longer have the "tag" that tells Quicktime to show them at 1920x1080, and if you play them, they will be shown at a 1:1 pixel aspect ratio (1440x1080), which looks scrunched.
    Before Quicktime 7.1, the solution was to load the file in Quicktime Pro, go into Movie Properties (CMD-J), and change the Visual Settings on the video track so the Scaled Size was 1920x1080 and save.
    Recent changes to Quicktime have added a presentation aperture property which has made this even more complicated. Now you have to go into the Movie Properties, change the Presentation properties so that the "Conform aperture to:" is off, and then change the Scaled Size as above.
    I hope this helps
    Message was edited by: Trevor Little

  • How to set height panelCollection

    hello all
    i have problem with UI, i can't set height panelCollection to full height in my page, and i have change StyleClass to AFStretchWidth/ AFStretchHeight
    this below structure in my project file
    template.jspx facet
    panelGroupLayout
    panelHeader
    panelCollection
    popup
    anyone help :)
    thx gan
    agungdmt

    Your PanelCollection is not stretched because neither PanelGroupLayout nor PanelHeader stretch its children. Either the PanelCollection has to be the root component or the whole hierarchy above it should be of components that stretch their children (for example, center facet of PanelStretchLayout, DecorativeBox, PanelSplitter, ShowDetailItem(stretch), etc.). Have a look here for more details:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/web.1111/b31973/af_orgpage.htm#CDEFAFGJ (See the last 2 columns in the table)
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/web.1111/b31973/af_orgpage.htm#CDEECCJF
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/web.1111/b31973/af_orgpage.htm#CACHIIAE
    Dimitar

  • How to find out which plugin is missing ( embed width="100%" height="100%" messagecallback="parent.frames.MANIPULATIONS.AppendMessage" spinfps="15" spiny="30")?

    How to find out which plugin is missing fro mthe website: http://web.it.nctu.edu.tw/~twli/interactive/scr_tutf.htm?
    After looking at one similar question found in mozilla support and answered by jscher2000 (https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/957655), I have found out I have to look for either &lt;object or &lt;embed. What I found is : &lt;embed width="100%" height="100%" messagecallback="parent.frames.MANIPULATIONS.AppendMessage" spinfps="15" spiny="30"
    What do I have to do now?

    This big1.mol (and possibly big2.mol) file is loaded in the embed plugin object that is opened in a iframe, so you can right-click the plugin area to check the embed code.
    *http://web.it.nctu.edu.tw/%7Etwli/interactive/big1.mol
    *http://web.it.nctu.edu.tw/%7Etwli/interactive/big2.mol

  • Img size height="100%" OK?

    I want my images to it in the viewer's window.
    Making the height="100%" does that. But only if I do not
    specify a width.
    It works in Safari on my Mac. Firefox displays the image in
    native size. Are there browsers that will distort the image?
    Here is my test page, using 97% for the height.
    http://tinyurl.com/rasxc
    Is there a way to do this with tables or div or ? Since all
    browsers don't work with img %s, perhaps my only choice is to wrap
    the image in a Flash movie.

    I agree... Sizing your images doesn't seem like a good idea
    at all..
    If you really "must" display your images this way, then I
    think the
    crash's take on it is quite good.
    Maybe there is also a javascript which would do the job, but
    I tend to
    stay away from js as the user may smiply have it disabled...
    Anurag
    crash wrote:
    > Why? What are you tryign to accomplish? THis is not a
    good way to size
    > images.
    >
    > The best way that I can think of would be to run aserver
    side script and get
    > the size of the user's viewport, then use PHP's GDI to
    manipulate your image
    > size.
    >
    > The way you're sizing that thing right now is ugly.
    You're just resizing
    > the display, nto the actual image.
    >
    >
    > "Wholeo" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    > news:eadk16$l5i$[email protected]..
    >> I want my images to it in the viewer's window.
    >> Making the height="100%" does that. But only if I do
    not specify a width.
    >> It works in Safari on my Mac. Firefox displays the
    image in native size.
    >> Are
    >> there browsers that will distort the image?
    >>
    >> Here is my test page, using 97% for the height.
    >>
    http://tinyurl.com/rasxc
    >>
    >> Is there a way to do this with tables or div or ?
    Since all browsers don't
    >> work with img %s, perhaps my only choice is to wrap
    the image in a Flash
    >> movie.
    >>
    >
    >

  • Hp 2159m Monitor is Set to 100 Brightness and is Dull

    Im' using Windows 8 - 64 bit.  Brightness is set to 100 and is till too dull. How can I boost the brightness?

    Hello Susankaye,
    Welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience! To help you get the most out of the HP Forums I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide First Time Here? Learn How to Post and More.
    I understand that the brightness on your monitor is set to 100 and is too low and you are looking for help getting it brigher. I would be happy to assist you, but first I would encourage you to post your product number for your computer. I am linking an HP Support document below that will show you how to find your product number. As with this I can provide you with accurate information.
    How Do I Find My Model Number or Product Number?
    Please re-post with the requested information and I would be happy to provide you with assistance. Thank you for posting on the HP Forums. Have a great day!
    Please click the "Thumbs Up" on the bottom right of this post to say thank you if you appreciate the support I provide!
    Also be sure to mark my post as “Accept as Solution" if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others who face the same challenge find the same solution.
    Dunidar
    I work on behalf of HP
    Find out a bit more about me by checking out my profile!
    "Customers don’t expect you to be perfect. They do expect you to fix things when they go wrong." ~ Donald Porter

Maybe you are looking for