Set Message Processing Queue based on input payload

Hi all..
Can i set the message processing queue from graphical mapping?
Receiver system in my scenario is ECC.Whuile sending messages to ECC, i need to send the message related to a particular ORDER Number in a particular queue.
for EX: if ORDER Number from my input payload is 457 i want to set the queue as ABC457.
Please let me know how to get it done from mapping or if there is any other approach.
Thanks
Manohar

Hi Ram,
What do you mean by Queue here?? we can check condition in mapping level only based on ORDER Number we can send message to receiver.use enhance receiver determination.
Regards,
Raj

Similar Messages

How to receive message from queue based on JMSPriority

Hi all,
I want to receive message from Receive Message From Queue based on JMSPrirority.
I am able to send message to queue using Send Message To Queue component with specifying Priority value as Five(Liternal value).
Now, when I am trying to receive message from Queue by specifying JMSPriority='Five'; in Message selector, it is not working.
But, when I use JMSPriority is not null in Message selector, I am able to receive message.
How to receive message from queue by specifying exact value of JMSPriority.
Please suggest.

Hi WASIL,
I tried with captial FIVE and it is not working.
I tried also like operator and the standard example doesn't recieve messages based on priority.
I am experiecing below error:
Caused by: javax.jms.InvalidSelectorException: The selector is invalid: JMSPriority LIKE '%FIVE%';
    at com.adobe.livecycle.jms.QueueMessageReceiver.receiveMessageFromQueueWithPropertiesNoWait( QueueMessageReceiver.java:206)
    at com.adobe.livecycle.jms.JMSService.receiveMessageFromQueue(JMSService.java:413)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1017.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
    at com.adobe.idp.dsc.component.impl.DefaultPOJOInvokerImpl.invoke(DefaultPOJOInvokerImpl.jav a:118)
    ... 135 more
Caused by: javax.jms.InvalidSelectorException: The selector is invalid: JMSPriority LIKE '%FIVE%';
    at org.jboss.jms.server.selector.Selector.<init>(Selector.java:107)
    at org.jboss.jms.server.endpoint.ServerSessionEndpoint.createConsumerDelegateInternal(Server SessionEndpoint.java:2103)
    at org.jboss.jms.server.endpoint.ServerSessionEndpoint.createConsumerDelegate(ServerSessionE ndpoint.java:277)
    at org.jboss.jms.server.endpoint.advised.SessionAdvised.org$jboss$jms$server$endpoint$advise d$SessionAdvised$createConsumerDelegate$aop(SessionAdvised.java:94)
    at org.jboss.jms.server.endpoint.advised.SessionAdvised$createConsumerDelegate_8721389917985 689973.invokeTarget(SessionAdvised$createConsumerDelegate_8721389917985689973.java)
    at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:111)
    at org.jboss.jms.server.container.SecurityAspect.handleCreateConsumerDelegate(SecurityAspect .java:124)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor389.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
    at org.jboss.aop.advice.PerInstanceAdvice.invoke(PerInstanceAdvice.java:122)
    at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:102)
    at org.jboss.jms.server.container.ServerLogInterceptor.invoke(ServerLogInterceptor.java:105)
    at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:102)
    at org.jboss.jms.server.endpoint.advised.SessionAdvised.createConsumerDelegate(SessionAdvise d.java)
    at org.jboss.jms.wireformat.SessionCreateConsumerDelegateRequest.serverInvoke(SessionCreateC onsumerDelegateRequest.java:100)
    at org.jboss.jms.server.remoting.JMSServerInvocationHandler.invoke(JMSServerInvocationHandle r.java:165)
    at org.jboss.remoting.ServerInvoker.invoke(ServerInvoker.java:967)
    at org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.completeInvocation(ServerThread.java:791 )
    at org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.processInvocation(ServerThread.java:744)
    at org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.dorun(ServerThread.java:586)
    at org.jboss.remoting.transport.socket.ServerThread.run(ServerThread.java:234)
    at org.jboss.remoting.MicroRemoteClientInvoker.invoke(MicroRemoteClientInvoker.java:216)
    at org.jboss.remoting.Client.invoke(Client.java:2034)
    at org.jboss.remoting.Client.invoke(Client.java:877)
    at org.jboss.remoting.Client.invoke(Client.java:865)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.delegate.DelegateSupport.doInvoke(DelegateSupport.java:189)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.delegate.DelegateSupport.doInvoke(DelegateSupport.java:160)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.delegate.ClientSessionDelegate.org$jboss$jms$client$delegate$ClientS essionDelegate$createConsumerDelegate$aop(ClientSessionDelegate.java:267)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.delegate.ClientSessionDelegate$createConsumerDelegate_87213899179856 89973.invokeTarget(ClientSessionDelegate$createConsumerDelegate_8721389917985689973.java)
    at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:111)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.container.StateCreationAspect.handleCreateConsumerDelegate(StateCrea tionAspect.java:136)
    at org.jboss.aop.advice.org.jboss.jms.client.container.StateCreationAspect_z_handleCreateCon sumerDelegate_930384804.invoke(StateCreationAspect_z_handleCreateConsumerDelegate_93038480 4.java)
    at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:102)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.container.ConsumerAspect.handleCreateConsumerDelegate(ConsumerAspect .java:76)
    at org.jboss.aop.advice.org.jboss.jms.client.container.ConsumerAspect_z_handleCreateConsumer Delegate_930384804.invoke(ConsumerAspect_z_handleCreateConsumerDelegate_930384804.java)
    at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:102)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.container.FailoverValveInterceptor.invoke(FailoverValveInterceptor.j ava:92)
    at org.jboss.aop.advice.PerInstanceInterceptor.invoke(PerInstanceInterceptor.java:86)
    at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:102)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.container.ClosedInterceptor.invoke(ClosedInterceptor.java:172)
    at org.jboss.aop.advice.PerInstanceInterceptor.invoke(PerInstanceInterceptor.java:86)
    at org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodInvocation.invokeNext(MethodInvocation.java:102)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.delegate.ClientSessionDelegate.createConsumerDelegate(ClientSessionD elegate.java)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.JBossSession.createConsumer(JBossSession.java:237)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.JBossSession.createConsumer(JBossSession.java:220)
    at org.jboss.jms.client.JBossSession.createReceiver(JBossSession.java:396)
    at com.adobe.livecycle.jms.QueueMessageReceiver.receiveMessageFromQueueWithPropertiesNoWait( QueueMessageReceiver.java:198)
    ... 140 more
Please suggest

Did anyone tried Rejection Message Handler via Queue based method?

Dear All,
I am presently doing a Rejected Message Handler process and successfully implemented with File based and Web Service based. But I am not getting the clue for Queue based. We can enqueue the rejected message into queue as a JMS message via this method. But the URI format they have given is *"jdbc:oracle:thin:@<host>:<port>:<sid>#<un>/<pw>#queue"*. Format includes jdbc connection string along with queue name. For this I have created JMS module with JDBC Persistent store and created queue in it. But still I am not able to enqueue the message inside the queue. Also, is there anyway to see the queue names inside the DB. Did anyone tried this method? Could you please share the info??

WL JMS Queue consume>BPEL1 (One way) invoke>Mediator service (one way) route> BPLE2 (one way). Also I have added transaction properties in BPEL1 and 2 + References + Services.
Now, if there is a fault in BPEL2 the transaction should be rolled back in BPEL1 and the message should be seen in the WL queue itself. But that is not happening in my case. Everything is getting rolled back upto a point just after the >recieve activity in BPEL1 except the message is not getting rolled back to queue.There will be 2 transactions in this scenario : 1) jms queue to soa hydration store 2) soa-hydration to bpel execution.
This is the behaviour for 1 way or async interfaces , jms adapter thread completes its transaction work after persisitng to dehydration store and another bpel system thread starts work executing the bpel code after retrieving the message off the db in a separate transaction. So the rollback you are seeing is only applicable for 2nd transaction which roll backs to the dehydration store instead of the queue.
For synchronous interfaces, the same adapter thread will be involved for complete message processing including bpel code execution. So I think if you want to get the jms queue within the same transaction you can try set up the interfaces to be sync, even with dummy responses. This might make jms adapter thread to start a transaction --> read message off queue within the same transaction --> execute bpel code within same transaction --> complete/rollback transaction based on bpel code execution.

Queue assignment based on Input

Hi All,
Is it possible to assign a particular queue based on the Input payload?
Regards,
Naresh

Hi,
Check these
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/12/12/how-to-prioritize-messages-in-xi
/people/arulraja.ma/blog/2006/08/18/xi-reliable-messaging-150-eoio-in-abap-proxies
Regards

How to get the input payload passed to the BPEL Process using java.

Hi all,
I am working on an application in which, if some fault occurs in the flow I need to insert the input payload that is being sent to the BPEL process into a Queue using Java. I have gone through the FaultHandling framework and failed to find the method by which we can get the input payload. Can someone kindly help me in getting the input payload. using the java.
Regards

Hi,
Use method getVariableData with your input variable.
Object getVariableData(String name, String part, String query)
For example: getVariableData("input", "payload", "/");
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17904_01/integration.1111/e10224/bp_java.htm
Cheers,
Vlad

How to stop message processing based on validation?

Hello experts,
I have a requirement to stop message processing in the graphical mapping based on validation results. Here is the scenario - messages are translated using graphical mapping and sent to the target system. An RFC lookup will be done to ECC to determine if the data in the message is good. If the lookup returns a negative result, message processing should be stopped right there.
I guess we can throw an exception from the mapping to force a failure and stop further processing, but that will cause the message to show up as failed on SXMB_MONI and cause alert emails to be sent out in PROD. Another option will be to supress creation of the root node itself, but I think the message will then fail in the subsequent "call adapter" step if the target schema has a min occurence of 1 for the root node (as in the case of IDocs).
Is it possible to do it without using BPM?
Thanks,
Michelle

Hi Michelle,
If your requirement, to stop message processing without sending an alert?
If yes, then you can have a alert rule, not to trigger alerts on a failure (And to raise an exception based on the result from RFC loookup).
If your requirement is not to make the message fail, then you have to go for the ccBPM route.
Best Regards,
Ravikanth Talagana

Problem validate the input payload in a bpel process

Hi
I am trying to validate the input payload in a bpel process and need to catch the exact validation error . I am using the validate activity or validate property
I am getting the error as
<process>
<main (80)>
receiveInput (pending)
Jun 21, 2013 12:24:57 PM Invalid data: The value for variable "inputVariable", part "payload" does not match the schema definition for this part Invalid text 'Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)Final cure time (Posn7)' in element: 'PARAM_NAME'. The invalid xml document is shown below:
<payload>
<catchAll (60)>
Unable to handle the error. Please help me if anybody handled this validation.
Thanks in advance
kalyani

One of the issues with using the validate activity in BPEL is that when the error is thrown it throws it with little information. Mediators however give much more information as they throw a remote exception and this can be caught. If you require detailed fault information to be sent back to the caller, then one solution is to use a mediator with validation as a callout (echo service etc). Then catch the remote exception, this will give you more information in the fault payload.

Get/set message Queue ID in PI 7.1 Adapter module

Hello,
I have a special requirment to get and set message Queue ID in PI 7.1 adapter module.
I tried to use the method setConversationID for the Message Class, but this doest seem to available any more.
Any pointers to which class and method can be used.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Abhishek

Hi, try [setSequenceId|http://help.sap.com/javadocs/pi/pi711sp03/com/sap/engine/interfaces/messaging/api/Message.html#setSequenceId(java.lang.String)]. Maybe you have to use setDeliverySemantics before in order to set EOIO.
regards, Martin

Message processing in the queue for long time

Hello All,
We are executing a file to Idoc scenario. The mapping is very complex.
The file to be processed is of size 125kb size. Which generates around 450 Idocs.
The file is picked by the adapter engine in hardly a minute.
But I see the message taking 6 hours to process in the Queue.
(SMQ2)
Is there a way I can improve and speed up the Queue processing.

Hi,
>message taking 6 hours to process in the Queue.
It should not happen,
Check whether all the Queue are Registered.
/people/sap.india5/blog/2006/01/03/xi-asynchronous-message-processing-understanding-xi-queues-part-i
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/59e837d3-0201-0010-c096-dc1869733413
Regards
Agasthuri Doss

How can we attach input payload of failed message in Alert mail

Hi Experts,
Please suggest If by using alert framework (No BPM) can we attach payload of failed message in alert mail.
If yes, Another query...
Scenario: IDoc to File
Requirement: If message fails in PI, need to trigger an alert mail having IDoc number(DOCNUM) in it.
Regards,
Raghav

Hi,
Thanks for your update Vankata, Please let me know in case message successfully passed receiver determination step and after that if it fails in any other step then how can we proceed for mail including Input payload field values.
Thanks for you suggestions sunil but I need to send mail only when any error happend in PI scenario. While using UDF or RFC lookup concept, I can only send mails independent of PI message failure. I mean to say what if message failed before mapping execution.
One query, Is it possible to handle this kind of scenario requirement where the input field value need to populate in mails ( not using BPM) via Custom modules?
Waiting for more suggestions on this.
Regards,
Raghav
Edited by: RaghavTiwari on Feb 15, 2012 3:55 PM
Edited by: RaghavTiwari on Feb 15, 2012 4:23 PM

SAP Blog XI Asynchronous Message Processing: Understanding XI Queues

Hi,
I was not able to access this blog anymore.
It was at this link before : XI Asynchronous Message Processing: Understanding XI Queues -Part I
Can someone please send me a copy if you've saved before? Thanks.
Please email to yuanyuanlin2001 at yahoo.com

hi,
the link is working and you can still access that - I've just tried
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Problem in Message Processing Rules

Hi All,
I have created Webservice(URL) for an transaction through Message Processing rule, with server name: 'XMIIMESSAGELISTENER'
URL: http://<IP Address>/XMII/Illuminator?Service=WSMessageListener&mode=WSMessageListenerServer&NAME=Shop_order_data&XacuteLoginName=<username>&XacuteLoginPassword=<passwrd>
Above URL or transaction has 1 input(XML) and 1 output(string)
As it tested from Oracle system, its working fine and updating all the data and saving xml file in MII DB.
As it save data in MII, it will send success message(string) in the output parameter of transaction.
This message has to send back Oracle system
Issues is, they are not recieving success message.
Is Message Process rule wont return any value or message from MII transaction to other system?
Please help me on this
Thanks,
Kind Regards,
Praveen Reddy M

Hi Praveen
The WSMessageListener HTTP Service does not process the incoming message immediately.
What you have done in MII.
1. Created a MII Transaction with an Input Param type XML and an Output Param Type String.
2. Configure the Transaction in MII Processing Rules for WSMessageListener server.
3. Sent XML Message to URL http://<IP Address>/XMII/Illuminator?Service=WSMessageListener&mode=WSMessageListenerServer&NAME=Shop_order_data&XacuteLoginName=<username>&XacuteLoginPassword=<passwrd>
What happens in the system:
1. MII WSMessageListener receives the XML Message and stores the message in MII DB.
2. It invokes the processing rule and runs the transaction that was configured for it.
3. Message status is set to Success.
This means that MIIWSMessageListener does not run the Transaction immediately upon receiving the XML Message. Hence the response of the Transaction output is not sent to the sender application. The reason for this is that the WSMessageListener service is treated as an asynchronous service where the sender does not care about the response of the receiver.
If this is not what you want then you can run your transaction in one of the following ways:
1. http://<host:<port>/XMII/Runner?Transaction=<project/folder/trx name>&OutputParameter=<paramname>
2. with a Soap Message to the URL http://<host>:<port>/XMII/SoapRunner/<Transaction full path>. Please note that this service expects a SOAP Message and not just an XML payload.
Hope this helps you.
Regards
Partha

OSB input payload with characters ' ' ' ' fails service invoke

Hi,
In OSB I am calling a USM service to search the contents. Created a Business Service out of USM Search WSDL and then a proxy service which calls the business service. When I am trying to test the service through SOAP UI with the below payload I get an error: *<faultstring>Error parsing the XML resource. The tag 'contains' has not been properly closed. Instead, the tag 'sear:queryText' was encountered.</faultstring>*
and when I run the same payload through OSB test console get an error:
The XML document is not well-formed:
error: </sear:queryText> does not close tag <contains>.
The same works in SOA Process but in OSB
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:ns1="http://www.stellent.com/Search/">
   <soapenv:Header/>
   <soapenv:Body>
      <ns1:AdvancedSearch>
         <ns1:queryText>(xIdcProfile<matches>`xxAB`)<AND>(x_ID<contains>`13-AZXX001-TST`)</ns1:queryText>
         <ns1:sortField>dInDate</ns1:sortField>
         <ns1:sortOrder>DESC</ns1:sortOrder>
      </sear:AdvancedSearch>
   </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>Now if I replaced *<* with *<* and *>* with *>* it works fine.
the below payload just works fine
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:ns1="http://www.stellent.com/Search/">
   <soapenv:Header/>
   <soapenv:Body>
      <ns1:AdvancedSearch>
         <ns1:queryText>(xIdcProfile<matches>`xxAB`)<AND>(x_ID<contains>`13-AZXX001-TST`)</ns1:queryText>
         <ns1:sortField>dInDate</ns1:sortField>
         <ns1:sortOrder>DESC</ns1:sortOrder>
      </sear:AdvancedSearch>
   </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>But the consumers of this service pass the data in this format *(xIdcProfile<matches>`xxAB`)<AND>(x_ID<contains>`13-AZXX001-TST`)* only. How do I make sure OSB takes in this format payload and executes it properly.
As the same thing works in Oracle SOA Process but in OSB it just chokes out. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks

Like others mentioned, the XML which your service consumer is sending is not a valid XML because of the special characters and you need to escape them.
1. The best way is to ask the service consumer to send a proper XML with any special characters put in a CDATA section or escaped.
2. If above is not possible, then you need to make sure that your first Proxy service which receives the message from service consumer is of Messaging type with text as input message format. AnyXML,AnySOAP or WSDL based services will error out because these types of services expect a proper valid XML document as input.
So in the messaging type service, you read the input message as text and then use the fn-bea:inlined-XML() and fn-bea:serialize() functions or CDATA to create a valid XML from the text input and pass this XML to your business service.

Oracle JMS Adapter - Bpel Pick message from AQ based on the correlationId?

Hello,
I'm experiencing an issue during pricking the messages from AQ based on the JMSCorrelationID in Asynchronously.
I've developed asynchronous BPEL services, which will post messages in AQ (Inbound), the same service will liston response from Out queue.
Currently my service is consuming all messages, i want to consume only relevant response message based on the correlation Id.
Could you please advise me?
Regards,
Paddy.

Thanks MaShek for your replay,
During process invocation I've generated guid and set this value to JMSCorrelationID property which will set as message corrlationID, same JMSCorrelationID coming in response as well, I've set on message property same JMSCorrelationID which I set in invocation.
If same message response comes then the pick activity is working fine that means consumed message and correlation correctly, but other messages also consuming and then rejecting message. I want to restrict this.
Only relevant correlationid messages need to pick and process.
If any suggestions appreciated.
Note: I'm using Jdev11.1.15,
Regards,
Paddy

Net.Msmq Binding Not Picking Up Messages in Queue as soon as the application pool gets recycled

Hi,
We are trying to implement a wcf service that exposes a net.msmq endpoint. We are running windows server 2008 R2/IIS 7.5 running on a DOMAIN mode.
1. Our service is called service.svc and it is deployed under an application called Test in the default website (application pool running under network service)
2. The url to reach the service webpage is http://machinename/Test/service.svc.
3. We created a private queue called Test/service.svc and we configured permissions for network service to full control.
Now, when the application pool is "alive" the service picks up the messages correctly, but as soon as the application pool gets recycled (because of timeout or any other reason), the service stops picking up the messages, that just sit in the queue until the service starts again by browsing to the service webpage (http://machinename/Test/service.svc)
I know this is a popular question, but I already tried several solutions with no luck (for example, we triedhttp://keithelder.net/blog/archive/2009/06/03/fix-for-wcf-netmsmqbinding-not-picking-up-messages-in-queue.aspx,http://www.codewrecks.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/17/hosting-a-wcf-service-based-on-msmq-in-iis7/,http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wcf/thread/a1df55c4-e642-442a-9057-f0aec278d10c/ and other ones)
Any Help?
If this post is helpful, please mark it as such
Alessandro Cardoso
MVP | Microsoft Heroes | MCT
blog: http://itaustralia.spaces.live.com
http://cardosoalessandro.spaces.live.com

Hi Steven,
I am Alessandro's colleague, I am working with him on these net.msmq issues.
Our configuration includes a transactional queue called Test/Service.svc (unauthenticated,
we shut down all security for the moment...does it matter?) and these attributes on the service:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IService
[OperationContract(IsOneWay=true)]
void ProcessMyMessage(MyClass parameter);
[ServiceBehavior(InstanceContextMode = InstanceContextMode.PerCall, TransactionIsolationLevel = IsolationLevel.Serializable, TransactionTimeout = "00:03:00")]
public class Service: IService
[OperationBehavior(TransactionScopeRequired = true, TransactionAutoComplete = true)]
public void ProcessMyMessage(MyClass parameter)
//Do some stuff here
The service is hosted on IIS 7.5 under an application called Test (so that the full http address of the service is http://machine/Test/Service.svc).
In the configuration (for both client and service) we specified None for the security mode, "true" value in durable and exactlyOnce
The Net.msmq Listener Adapter windows service is running fine under the Network Service account (the same as our application pool)
Is there something we are missing?
Also, can you explain how a transaction not configured properly can create this behaviour? In my understanding the process of delivering a message happens in 3 steps (I remember a nice picture of this the Juval Lowy book):
1) Transaction 1: client delivers message to local instance of msmq. The transaction rolls back if the message does not get delivered.
2) Transaction 2: the local instance of msmq delivers the message to the remote (service) instance of msmq. The transaction rolls back if the message does not get delivered.
3) Transaction 3: wcf activates my service which picks up the message and process it. The transaction rolls back if the service fails to pick up the message or does not complete the transaction (for example, because of an unhandled exception).
The message gets delivered to the service machine successfully, so I am assuming that steps 1 and 2 are executed correctly. If my service was not configured to handle transaction properly, wcf should still activate it and do something with it. Or at least,
if it doesn't get activated at all, this should be the case even when the application pool is well alive and awake, because it should be a configuration problem. Instead, the service works great if the appPool is alive and it never gets activated when the
appPool is sleeping (absolute nothing in the .svclog trace file generated by the service). Am I saying something wrong?

Set Message Processing Queue based on input payload

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for