Set up Plant in India with US Company code

Hi MM Gurus,
I am in the process of setting up new SAP plant in india linked to US company code. When I enter the address information, there isn't any regions in selection screen under country IN. Why is that? Also, is there any other things I should be looking into while setting this Plant. I have successfully setup many SAP Plants with US address, but its the first time I am doing for country IN.
Thanks
Suri

Hello Suri,
You need to define region code for country IN in the following path:
SPRO --> General Settings --> Set countries --> Insert Regions
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Similar Messages

  • Project stock exist in a plant and WBS but with different company code

    Hello,
    As I know I can not create a PO in company A, but was assigned to a WBS maintained in company code B. The system will check if the WBS getting the same company code with the PO, and pop up  the error message if the company code was differect.
    But seems the project stock could exists in a plant  but assign to  WBS was maintained with different company code. For example, A material stock was in plant A assigned to company code A, and it is also assigned to WBS belong to company code B.
    Any one know it is correct?
    Thanks!

    I knew crossing company code to assign WBS element to PO is not allowed since i got the error message, and I think it's reasonable, cause the expense from the project PO should post to the same company code through the WBS element.
    But why for  the inventory crossing company code is allowed?  The stock in plant A belong to company code A, was assigned to WBS element B belong to company code B. That means the inventory is in the GL balance of company A but under the profit center belong to company B.  How to understand it? I think it's wrong

  • Creating order with out Company code and plant - just for pricing -possible

    Hi gurus
    Just for creating sales order (let us say no delivery and no billing, client was not intrested in the initial setup) for just pricing thing, does we really need Company code and plant. with out that just with sales org setup(sale org+D.C) can I create an order to full fil the pricing scenario.
    Please I need help on this
    Thanks
    Kris

    hi kris,
            we cannot create a order with out company code and plant , due to the following reasons
          we do not require the company code to create the order , but we require the plant to create a material and use it in the sales order .and we require a company code to create a customer .
    the pricing procedure is determined depending upon the sales area(sales org+distribution channel +division).
    please reward the points if it is helpful
    Regards,
    Murali

  • PO created with wrong Company code

    Hi Gurus,
    I have Plant XXXX assigned to Company code 1111 and
             Plant YYYY assigned to Company code 2222
    One of the user has created PO with Plant XXXX and company code wrong as 2222.
    (we have warning message setup & not error message. So, it allowed user to create PO with wrong Company code and save)
    GR & IR both are already posted. I find the accounting document of these GR/IR show correct company code as XXXX-1111 (mostly would have taken correctly based on plant XXXX).
    These are service POs (non stock).
    Now user wants to change the company code in PO to 1111.
    I checked...and system simply allow to change to company code to correct one i.e 1111. It does not give any message.
    Could any one give me some additional info.. if it is right to do so? I am not too convinced at this moment.
    I was suggesting user to reverse GR, IR, delete PO and create new PO. Is that right?
    Thanks n advance for your input.
    Best Regards,
    Mohan

    Dear Mohan,
    U can change the company code in PO as it will not have any impact since the GR and IR is completed.
    Accounts are hit based on the valution area(valuation grouping code).
    Since the PO is already closed u can go ahead the change the same.
    Regards,
    AM Vahanan

  • Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

    Hi Gurus,
    I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
    In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
    While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
    Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
    Message no. F5786
    Diagnosis
    You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
    System Response
    You cannot enter this kind of document.
    Procedure
    Enter the transaction in two documents.
    For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
    The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
    Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
    JBC.

    Hi Mamta,
    Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
    For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
    I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
    Posting        GL                   Co Code
    Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
    Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
    For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
    I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
    Thanks,
    Bapu

  • Cross company subcontrating in sap with same company code

    Dear Sir
    we have an scinario of cross company subcontrating in sap with same company code , take an example my plat is 1003 and another is 1019 with same company code, so is it possible to do subcontracting ? i will process doccoumntation like j1if01
    which i raise with vendor also.
    plz send me procedure
    regards''
    sumit

    Yes,you can do subcontracting between plants of same company code.
    You need to to treat respective plants as vendors.
    SAP process may be
    1. Create a subcon p.o (sending plant as vendor)
    2. Issue material using MB1B
    3. Raise challan using J1IF01 if it is excisable or else print material document(step-2) as delivery challan for reference.
    4. Receiving plant will raise sales order based on p.o
    5. GR material from issuing plant - MIGO
    6. Process material
    7. Do Delivery / PGI from receiving plant
    8. Do billing or proforma invoice
    9. Receive processed  material based on p.o
    10. Challan reconcillation(not needed if material is non excisable)
    11. Invoice for subcontracting work(optional)

  • Single excise registraction to two excise registration with same company code

    Dear all,
    Our customer is using single excise registraction now with three plants and one company code and doing STO between the plants with shipping (641/101). We have implemented SAP with the above scenario. (SAP ECC 6.4 implementation with TAXINN procedure)
    Now, the excise registraction is splitted into two, out of three plants, two plant comes under one excise registration and remaining one plant comes under another registration.still all the three plants are under the same company code only.
    Need your help on what are all the changes interms of process and configurations
    Earlier response will be highly appriciated
    Reg
    Sridharan

    HI Sridhar,
    You have to define customer, vendor option but without account aspect.
    Following are the steps in STO between a plant ( seperate Excisable units)
    You will create an STO ( Purchase order from Receiving plant)
    1: Create Delivery and excise invoice on the basis of performa invoice ( in performa invocie no accounting entry)  Excise register will be updated on the basis of this not account entry would be as below:
    Delivery: ( movement type 641)
    Stock at receiving plant Dr to
    Stock at Sending palnt
    You would be following standard cost incase of SFG and FG. so materail valuation would on same basis and there may be valuation difference.
    Excsie invoice generation:
    Excise Clearing account Dr To
    Excise Duty payable
    Excise Duty Cess Payable
    Excsie Duty hCess Payable
    At receiving palnt you would receive material through MIGO no account entry will be generated only physical receepi of material.
    Capture the excise in J1iex wrt to excsie challan.
    Hope the process will help you.
    Regards
    Pankaj

  • Form-16 ,if employee get transfered with same company code.

    Hi Friends,
    If an employee get ransfered from one personnel subarea to other personnel subarea with same company code, can we get Form-16 seperately for two different periods.
    Thanks in advance.
    Appreciate any help and points will surely be rewarded.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nanditha

    Hi,
    Pricing configuration for STO: -
    In SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Conditions > Define Price Determination Process > Define Schema Determination > Determine Schema for Stock Transport Orders > Here assign Calculation Schema "RM2000" i.e. Stock Transfer Document to Schema Grp Pur. Org, STO Type (For e.g. UB) and Supplying Plant.
    Calculation Schema "RM2000" has condition type P101 which will pick up the MAP of supplying plant automatically during creation of STO in ME21N ("Conditions" Tab).
    You can create new freight / delivery cost conditions in M/06 for Margin and assign in pricing procedure "RM2000" in M/08 and also assign the Accrual Key to this and do the Account Determination for this Accrual Key in OBYC
    At the time of PGI, following accounting entry will get generated;
    Stock A/c - Dr - 110 INR (Receiving Plant)
    Stock A/c - Cr - 100 INR (Supplying Plant)
    Margin Account - Cr - 10 INR (Supplying Plant)

  • SRM PO created with wrong company code

    Hello,
            The users have created several PO in SRM with wrong company code. The user was found in the wrong organization structure during the creation of shopping and approval. The PO did not get transfer to the Back because of this. Is there a way to modify the PO and change the company code.
       In case we want to modify it in the tables given that BBP_PD gives you an indication of which table and entry to modify, is there a way to do this operation (like SE16N in ECC)? Have you ever done this and what risk is their in such an operation.
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    I doubt anyone here will (or will dare) suggesting to you how to do it as it is against SAP practise totally. if the document is created wrongly, it should be deleted and approved with all the tracking and changes in place for auditing purposes.
    Frankly that is what you should practise as well.. my 2cents opinion.
    Regards.
    YS

  • Vendor Master Creation through IDoc with Multiple Company Codes

    I am trying to create vendor masters sent from a 3rd party into SAP using CREMAS05 IDoc.  I have the requirement that the vendor should be created in each of 3 company codes and the vendor number is internally assigned in SAP.
    I create my IDoc with the general data E1LFA1M and multiple E1LFB1M & E1LFB5M Children.  When I post the IDoc using IDOC_INPUT_CREMAS which uses Call Transaction, the vendor gets created for the first company code, but the IDoc errors on the vendor extension XK01 for the next company code with the error: "Fill all required fields SAPMF02K 0111 ADDR1_DATA-NAME1". 
    In debugging through this, it appears that the vendor number that gets created in the first XK01 transaction does not get passed into the data for the second XK01 call and SAP tries to create a new vendor instead of extending the newly created one.
    If I force the value in during debug after the initial call transaction into the variable h_lifnr, it works fine (Vendor created with multiple company codes.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    -Larry

    I cannot give you exact solution, but can guess why this is happening, below is what I believe.
    I think Synchronous update is not happening in call transaction, second transaction is getting processed before the first one is saved, debugging it works fine, because we give system enough time to save while processing.
    Generally in call transaction we have MODE, if we pass S - then synchronous update happens, in your case, you need to find the way to incorporate this.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Ravi Kishore.

  • How to prevent settlements from AE to wbs with different company code

    Hi gurus,
    i'm currently facing a problem regarding settlements from activity elements to wbs above.
    we have one controllign areas with various company codes.
    For some projects, we have wbs assigned to company code A and activity elements assigned to Company A and B.
    We have an automatic settlement rule generation so that we settle all activity element costs to wbs. But, for activity elements assigned to company B, we don't want to settle the costs, we want to go through a sd/mm invoicing between the two companies.
    How can we prevent the settlement to take place, apart from manually removing the settlement rule for each activity element?
    can we put a validation rule that check that whenever the company code in the wbs is different from the one in the activity element, then the settlement doesn't take place? or remove the automatic settlement rule generation and use cjb1 to generate settlement rules only when an activity element as the same company code as the wbs above. would it be possible?
    would the WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE BADI or badi proj be of any help?
    Any help is welcome.
    regards
    tim
    Edited by: Tim Ursulet on Jan 22, 2009 5:29 PM

    Hi Tim,
    The transaction CJB1 or CJB2 creates the settlment rules for WBS only, therefore the transactions and Badi WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE BADI are NOT relevant for the settlement rules of activity and elements at all.
    For the settlement rules of activity (and elements) the default rule is inserted, as soon as the user navigate to the settlemenent rule overview screen, if the activity do not have the settlement rule at that time. I am not sure, if there is BaDi or substituation to prevent the system apply this default rule in certain case. Other alternative is to specify the objects during settlement,  e.g. using selection variant with the company code.
    Kind regards,
    Zhenbo

  • Vendor master data with the company code

    Hi Friends,
       There is a requirement to pull out all the vendor master records with the company code.  I didnt find any standard report how can i pull the  same plz guide me...
    Thanks
    Prem

    check whether compounded infoobject (Material & Company Code) is available then you could create a report on that.
    Vikash

  • Difference between Group A/c and Chart of Account with serval Company Code

    Hi Friends,
    Please explain the term chart of account with serval company code and also group a/c.
    Thanks and regards,
    Dev

    Hi Mahendra
    The Chart of Accounts is a list/directory of the G/L acounts maintained in the company. This COA can be used by one or many company codes.
    For e.g Co code A located in Delhi and Co code B In Mumbai may use the same COA for reporting as well as consolidation purpose.
    Group COA is maintained when there are more than one COA (e.g country-specific and operating COA) being used in the company. In this case the COA maintain alternative account numbers to the same account for automatic updation and consolidation.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Kavitha

  • One controlling area  with two company codes assigned with one CoA

    Hi,
    I   am having one controlling area  with two company codes assigned , i am using the same  gl for two company codes  as cost element , when i am positng the  miro for vendor purpose  it posted the error  , to avoid the  price difference purpose , i have given  one cost center  of  first company code in OKB9 , and  overcome the error , entries posted, when i am posting new entry for MIRO   in secod  company codes with same cost  element ,  price difference of that account should go to the other cost center  which specifically created for second company code,  in the OBK9 i have given  cost center first company code   of the same GL  account , now this is another new entry in the second company code with other cost center in the second company code  since the price difference  account should sit in the other cost center of second company code,  how to  over come  this problem, pls help me
    Thanks and regards
    Murugesan

    Hi,
    First, remove the default cost center in the cost element. Then, for the system to derive the correct cost center for each company codes, define one cost center for each compny codes in OKB9 just like this:
    Co Code   Cost Element   Cost Center
    1000          1000000              A
    2000          1000000              B
    So during MIRO, the system will derive these values you maintain in OKB9.
    Regards,

  • EXTERNAL OPERATION in a production order with  different company code plant

    Hi,
    in my case i am having a production order with  4 operations.
      0010 milling
      0020 winding
      0030 cutting
      0040 milling
    among this opearion 0030 i want to do it in a plant which is assigned to different company code than mine.
    in this case whether i should proceed with PP01 Control key  with opearion plant as that plant which is lieing in diffent company code or
    i should specify  PP02 control key saying that plant as an external vendor for me and do PR  and PO for that service .
    which should i follow for my case and how cost gets updated .

    Hi,
          For different company code, u have to specify PP02 in the routing for external vendor. In PP02 control key indicator must be set in external opn.
    Before that create purchase info record.
    Enter subcontract info record in routing.
    after running MRP , convert the PR to PO.
    Send the material by MB1B by 541 mvt
    Receive the material by MIGO  by 101 mvt.
    Regards,
    Raja sd

Maybe you are looking for