Setting default costing relevancy on IW31

Hi all,
i have problems with the definition of the default value of the costing relevancy during the creation of an orden by the transaction IW31.
In particular i have to set that default value just for a specific order type.
is it possible doing it?
Thanks.
Lello

Hi,
To define your own logic you can use BAdI IWO1_ORDER_BADI with method CHANGE_COSTRELEVNCY to set 'relevant for costing flag'. See also some information in note [649743|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/649743].
-Paul

Similar Messages

Costing relevancy in bill of materials

Hi Experts,
We have default settings to mark items in bill of materials as costing relevant, we have certain materials for which we do not want default costing relevancy as waht has been sent in default values. but for most of the materials default settings should be applicable.
is ther any settings where for certain materials default settings can be overwritten, do not cost in costing tab page did not worked, and default costing relevancy was taken for item.
Thanks in advance
Anand

Dear,
Pipeline materials are relevant for costing it pickup price from the Info-record. If you don't want to cost that item you need to remove its costing relevancy from bill of material. Or else define it as non valuated material and then assign it in BOM.
Bulk material are not cost relevant it will available in mass. For the standard cost estimate and the calculation of planned costs and actual costs for a work order, will not included in costing.
You can not make it material specific setting default for the BOM.
In OS18 you can define you own cost Relevancy and by BOM usage in OS20
Customizing under Production -> Basic Data -> Bill of Material -> General Data -> BOM Usage -> Define BOM Usages.
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Default cost center can't work

we encounter a error in MI07, it says account 5300010 required a assignment for CO object, however we can't set default cost center for this account, because for inventory difference we need to go for different costcenter. is there any other solution, 5300010 is created as cost element.

Hi,
What is the basis for determining cost center ? Without ascertaining this, you can't resolve your with a substitution.
I have used OKB9 settings to post these kinds of scenarios.
Best Regards,
Madhu

Default Cost element pick up despite there is no setting in config.defined

Hi,
During external services(control key PM03), system picks up default cost element in maintenance order. Irony is that I have set no default cost element in "External procurement service in Config". I have also checked there is no default user data, despite this default cost element system picks up.
Please suggest me what to do.
Thanks & Regards
D.Singh

Once you enter the control key PM03, you will get pop up for maintaining material group. If you have defined the material group in config, cost element will be picked up from that.
Cost element will be picked up from the Material group which you mentioned in Order or in config.

Cost Relevance Indicator default in BOM

Hi All,
The cost relevance indicator is by default X in the BOM. I have defined a new cost relevevance indicator as Y. How can i default the new indicator in teh BOM
Appreciiate your support
Regards
Tehseen

Hi,
Reason of making a new costing relevance indicator.
Our management wants to add 10% extra cost in that is calculated in Quotation. Also the 10% must only be applied on paperboard items of the BOM. The same BOM is used in Quotation and Sales orders. So i have defined a new indicator Y with 110%. I have changed all paperboard items in the BOM as Y. This solution works fine in the Quotations. But when i calculate cost in Sales order, the same 110% get applied on all paperboard cost which we dont want. In sales order we want 100% cost. Both sales order and quotations have diffrerent costing variants. Further please also explain that while i run CK11N, it calculates cost only based on indicator X which is ok. I want the same cost calculation in Sales orders. We are using condition EK02 to calculate cost in Quotation & Sales Orders.
Appreciate your support
SAPXPT

Costing Relevancy indicator cannot be set as 50%

Hello,
I have a issues with costing relevancy indicator in production order item. It doesnot consider the % such as (25% or 50%) costing relevancy. Only 100% or " " is considered.
Kindly let me know the steps to achieve the 50% costing relevancy for order component.
Best Regards
Sameer

Hi UKSAPPP ,
I have checked transaction OS18 and found that the factors are maintained. Actually i am looking for the 50% cost of component in production order planned cost. Does this come under inventory coseting as per you reply?
Because the customer wants this in production order cost for that component where this relevancy to costing is maintained as 50%.
Regards
Sameer

Costing relevancy of BOM

Hi guys,
M a bit new in SAP.so this question may sound very basic.
My question is when we go to item data in BOM,there is a tab status/lng text.
In that tab there is costing relevancy indicator field.
If i need it to be x all the time and it should be default to all items,what settings need to be done.
Thanks,
Sam

Thanks a lot Ganesh/Anish,
You gave me the required solutution.Can I ask you guys another question?
If i am copying my prod bom from SD bom and the indicator u told me about is not set for SD BOM,will that indicator still appear in production BOM?
Regards,
SAM

Cost relevancy indicator for Material

Dear PS colleagues,
Refer to the subject, when we assign a material to activity then sometimes cost relevancy indicator (on General Data tab for material) is ticked & sometimes not, can you guide me how it is controlled.It seems that it may me controlled from material master but not sure.Pl suggest...
Regards,
Ashok Sangal

Hi,
All materials which are account assigned to network/ activity, or WBS element are defaulted with cost-relevancy indicator, though this can subsequently be changed manually. This defaulting is hard-coded (as far as I know) and is dependent on the procurement type . For instance, if you attach a stock (cat:L)material component with collective requirement indicator in MRP4 to a network activity and if you opt for procurement type "Planned Indpendent requirement", you will find that 'Cost Relevancy" indicator is not defauluted. For the same material component with the setting material master settings, if you opt for procurement type "Reservation to Network", the cost relevancy indicator gets defaulted.
Obviously, text type materials etc. will not have any cost relevancy.
Hence, we can conclude that materials which are account assigned (i.e which are relevant for adding cost to proejct objects) will be defaulted with "Cost relevancy" indicator.
If you use BOM transfer functionality, you can define the cost relevancy in the "Profile for BOM transfer"
Hope the information provided is useful and relevant.
Regards
Muraleedharan.R

Shipment cost relevance checkbox

*Hi Gurus,*
*I got a recent issue with shipment cost relevance check box. My shipment type is shipment cost relevant and by customizing it has been set. while creating new shipment always this box is defaulting ticked .But user reported few shipment Nos. where it has not been ticked and am not able to find out the actual reason. While creating test case it is always working properly. User confirmed there is no manual untick of the checkbox. Can you suggest me any probable reason why this checkbox box is getting unticked automatically?*
*Thanks in advance*

Check in T_57 to see if you have activated the Shipment type under the Header and Leg whichever you are looking for.
There can be two reasons:
Check if the shipment is a old one.
Check if he is using the right shipment type.

Can you set a Cost Rate Table to be used for an entire project

In earlier versions of project, the default cost rate table (A) is used unless changed by the user for each assignment. In 2010, is it possible to define which cost rate table to use for the entire project, not at the assignment level?
Thanks.

Hi melduncan,
Welcome to this Microsoft Project forum:)
I assume you want project to have a default cost rate, so why not set the cost rate details into A to begin with, You could then set this as a template from which you initiate all your new projects see FAQ
Item: 8. New Project Template. FAQs, companion products and other useful Project information can be seen at this web address: http://project.mvps.org/faqs.htm
Hope this helps - please let us know how you get on :)
Mike Glen
MS Project MVP
See
http://tinyurl.com/2xbhc for my free Project Tutorials
"" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In earlier versions of project, the default cost rate table (A) is used unless changed by the user for each assignment. In 2010, is it possible to define which cost rate table to use for the entire project, not at the assignment level?
Thanks.

In Transaction code va41 how to set default sales contract start date

Hi ,
In Transaction code " VA41 " how to set default sales contract start date and end date.
Can any one tell me the correct user exit for the same.
Thanks
Basu

hi,
u have to use user exits or badis.
use sutable exits mentioned below.
SDTRM001 Reschedule schedule lines without a new ATP check
SDVFX006 User exit: Tax line (transfer to accounting)
V45A0001 Determine alternative materials for product selection
V45A0002 Predefine sold-to party in sales document
V45A0003 Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
V45A0004 Copy packing proposal
V45E0001 Update the purchase order from the sales order
V45E0002 Data transfer in procurement elements (PRreq., assembly)
V45L0001 SD component supplier processing (customer enhancements)
V45P0001 SD customer function for cross-company code sales
V45S0001 Update sales document from configuration
V45S0003 MRP-relevance for incomplete configuration
V45S0004 Effectivity type in sales order
V45W0001 SD Service Management: Forward Contract Data to Item
V46H0001 SD Customer functions for resource-related billing
V60F0001 SD Billing plan (customer enhancement) diff. to billing plan
Edited by: katigiri linganna on Apr 28, 2009 12:19 PM

Issue with update of BOM by Variant Config - Cost relevant indicator

Hi All VC Expert,
We are facing an issue with the update by reference characteristic of the field STPO-SANKA Cost relevancy indicator on the BOM.
We are on SAP ECC 6.0 release 700 on Oracle
Hot Package
- SAPKA70015 on ERP Cross Application componenent
- SAPKH60013 on SAP-APPL Logistics and accouting
We are using material variant
We are on the first level of configuration
Classically, we built a procedure to set X to this data base field as below :
$self.STPO_SANKA = 'X'
We assigned this procedure to the relevant items
Here is the result we have:
At the creation of the Plan Order, this is not working
At the creation of the Prod Order, this is not working
When we do a Reload PP master data, this is working very well
On CU50/VA02 when we check the trace, the procedure is executed.
Do somebody have an idea or already facing this and solve it ?
Thanks in advance for your appreciated help.

Hi Fabien. Did you solve your problem?

Maintain default cost element in controlling area USD

Hi All,
I were trying to clear vendor down payment with vendor invoice ( error)required me to Maintain default cost element in controlling area USD.
Is that a way to do without making to default cost elemnt
Thank you for your help
Regards
bali

Hi,
As process you should clear the down payment first and then vendor thry F-44.
It should not be asking you for default cost centre untill there is validation rule set.
hope this helps you.
Regards
Bharat

How to set default values in dialog programming

hi gurus
can anyone suggest me
how to set default values in dialog programming
thanks&regards
kals.

it's a bit dirty but I usually just place it in the PBO with a flag for control. It's simple and not too costly i think.
MODULE preRender OUTPUT.
DATA first_time TYPE flag VALUE 'X'.
IF first_time EQ 'X'.
* put your initialization code here
CLEAR first_time.
ENDIF.
ENDMODULE.
-MiR

Change default cost assignment specification

Hello,
I do have an organisation which assignes all travel expenses to (project) orders instead of cost centers.
Is there a way to change the default cost assignment (cost centers) to (project) orders on the travel expense WebDynpro?
As there is no project order maintained in any employee related Infotype this should force the traveller to select the appropriate (project) order from a list.
Thanks for your feedback,
Wolfgang

Hello Wolfgang
Good news you can do this by customizing
You can even hide unused cost objects if you need only orders.
This can be customized here : Financial accounting (new) => travel management => Employee Self-Services => Interface Configuration for web dynpro interface in travel management => Set up variable layout for account assignment objects
Hope this helps
Mathieu

Setting default costing relevancy on IW31

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for