Setting up a RAID of system drives

hello everyone,
I am looking to add a second system drive for more hd space. I was planning on purchasing a second Raptor and setting up a RAID 0. will I need to format my existing drive, or can I just plug in the new drive and set up my RAID in DU?
...any feedback appreciated, thanks.
Dual-core PwrPC 2.0ghz G5 2mb RAM Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Ok,
You already have a Raptor as boot, most likely it's a 36 or 74GB with 8 MB cache and it's hooked up to your internal SATA ports.
To create a RAID O, you must match the two drives exactly. Erase w/Zero both of them, create the RAID O set in Disk utility and clone your boot drive back from a booted external drive using cloning software. (meaning you have to first clone the original to a external then boot from it and clone to the RAID O)
Problem: Western Digital has updated all their drives with a new SATA spec, also increased the cache to 16 MB. The PowerMac's can't handle the new SATA spec (supposedly the Quad can, but I'm hearing mixed stories)
So unless you find a 8MB cache Raptor, your going to need to spend more money.
The solution if your determined to have RAID O Raptors, is to buy two of them, preferably the new 10,000 RPM 16MB cache 150GB ones, and a Firmteck SATA PCI card (the only one that's bootable off of) with 4 internal SATA ports and 4 external ports. Then hook the internal Raptors to that.
The Firmteck card will also give you the option of hooking up external SATA drives in a powered enclosure, one cable to each drive. So you can expand if you wish.
With a RAID O, you must clone (for a whole boot drive) or backup (for files) quite regularly, like at least once a week for clone and daily backup for files. Since one should be doing this anyway, it's really no big deal. Because like the other poster said, RAID O is a bit more risky, one drive goes you lose all data as the data path is split. But the speed is worth it. So with a pair of 150GB Raptors your going to need a 250-300GB drive external Firewire 800/400 drive.
Now to keep a drives performance up, you shouldn't fill it more than 50%, and certainly shouldn't fill a boot drive more than 80%. So one can use a 250GB external drive for clone backup as long as the data on the 300GB RAID O doesn't go over around 240GB. (80%) Get it?
LaCie makes a good Firewire 800/400/USB d2 drive.
However if this is a bit too much to bear on your wallet, then what you can do is reduce what you have on the boot Raptor below 50% by moving just what you have in documents, pictures, movies and audio files into NEW folders on a second internal SATA drive (preferably one with 16MB cache not from Western Digital)
Once you have slimmed up your Raptor, then clone the whole drive to a external drive, option boot from it and make sure everything works correctly, repair permissions and test all software (some copy protected ones will need to be fixed). Once your are 100% certain it's ok, then Erase w/Zero the Raptor and clone the whole drive back.
What this will do is optimize the Raptor boot drive drive, free up disk space, de-fragment large files/apps and sort of tighten everything up to the most fastest part of your boot drive, the outer tracks, in the good part of the 50% side of your drive. (vs the inner tracks where performance starts to suffer)
Without the space hogging files that are now on the second SATA drive, your drive freshly optimized, the arm in the hard drive has less space to travel to get your data that Mac OS X, apps and random music files iTunes needs to constantly access.
Now I suggest using Carbon Copy Cloner to do your optimizations with, because I know how this program clones drives, in alphabetical order on the main directory of your boot drive. So Applications, Developer (if you have installed Developers Tools from Tiger install disk) Library, System and finally Users at the end (where it could expand without de-optimizing your drive)
Always follow these rules when cloning.
1: Don't run or do anything else while a cloning process is going on.
2: Always Disk utility Erase w/Zero option all new drives one time or in the case of a security issue.
3: Option boot from the clone and check it out.
4: Repair permissions BEFORE and AFTER each cloning.
5: Avoid partial clones because of copy protection schemes hiding files on the drive.
6: Avoid cloning to partitions, especially on the same drive, because if the drive fails mechanically your screwed out of your clone as well. Keep it a boot clone to a boot clone on a separate drive.
7: If you can keep two clones of your boot drive, just in case you get hacked or have a exploit, because when you hook up the second clone, it will get owned too and possibly erased. If this happens, C boot off the installer disk (write protected) and Erase w/Zero all infected drives and disconnect from the internet/network before hooking up that last clone.
I wrote a book, I hope it helps.
Note to others: Firmteck SATA PCI card will not work in PCI-Expressed based PowerMac's.
http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/firmtek/1eve4/

Similar Messages

  • Setting up a Raid O system.

    I have a P5E motherboard with 6 SATA slots. I have been in the editing universe since 1999 and have never used raid as I always found it very complicated to set up. However for an upcomming projet I would like to be on top of things and get rid of the eternal hard drive bottleneck problem. What is the easiest way to set up a RAID 0 system and could somebody here please guide me through the essential steps. I just was never able to figure it out. Thank you

    I would highly recommend setting up Raid 10, not Raid 0.
    In my hardware based system, I just added drives as members in the Raid setup from the BIOS.
    Four 500GB drives give me 1TB of storage with a combination of striping and mirroring.
    I actually had a hard drive problem, and never even noticed it. The next time I booted, I saw the problem, went into the Raid BIOS, removed the bad drive from the Raid and then added it back in. The Raid rebuilt itself without me doing anything and returned to "Normal."
    While it's good to have someone who knows what they are doing set it up for you, it's probably better to try it yourself so you know what's going on if there's a problem in the future, IMHO.
    Just don't start experimenting two days before that huge job is due to start....:)

  • Setting up a RAID

    I just got another internal hard drive for my Mac Pro, and I'm thinking setting up a RAID between two drives. I read some documentation here on Apple, but I wanted to check and make sure about one thing. Do both of the drives I plan to set up a RAID need to be erased first? It doesn't say that in the documentation. Or can precede with the RAID even though one drive has data on it and the other doesn't.
    And finally, if I plan to add VISTA to RAIDed drives, will that be a problem?
    Thanks for the feedback.

    All drives used in a RAID will be erased. You cannot add an active startup volume to a RAID. You cannot use a RAID for a Boot Camp Windows installation. If you install OS X on a RAID you will not be able to install firmware updates for your computer.
    RAID Basics
    For basic definitions and discussion of what a RAID is and the different types of RAIDs see RAIDs. Additional discussions plus advantages and disadvantages of RAIDs and different RAID arrays see:
    RAID Tutorial;
    RAID Array and Server: Hardware and Service Comparison>.
    Hardware or Software RAID?
    RAID Hardware Vs RAID Software - What is your best option?
    RAID is a method of combining multiple disk drives into a single entity in order to improve the overall performance and reliability of your system. The different options for combining the disks are referred to as RAID levels. There are several different levels of RAID available depending on the needs of your system. One of the options available to you is whether you should use a Hardware RAID solution or a Software RAID solution.
    RAID Hardware is always a disk controller to which you can cable up the disk drives. RAID Software is a set of kernel modules coupled together with management utilities that implement RAID in Software and require no additional hardware.
    Pros and cons
    Software RAID is more flexible than Hardware RAID. Software RAID is also considerably less expensive. On the other hand, a Software RAID system requires more CPU cycles and power to run well than a comparable Hardware RAID System. Also, because Software RAID operates on a partition by partition basis where a number of individual disk partitions are grouped together as opposed to Hardware RAID systems which generally group together entire disk drives, Software RAID tends be slightly more complicated to run. This is because it has more available configurations and options. An added benefit to the slightly more expensive Hardware RAID solution is that many Hardware RAID systems incorporate features that are specialized for optimizing the performance of your system.
    For more detailed information on the differences between Software RAID and Hardware RAID you may want to read: Hardware RAID vs. Software RAID: Which Implementation is Best for my Application?
    You would be wiser to use you second drive to backup your main drive and forget about RAIDs. They are of no real value to the home user like yourself. RAIDs are used mainly for large enterprise servers and very fast data storage systems.

  • Macbook Pro: How do I set up a RAID system?

    Macbook Pro: How do I set up a RAID system on a MACBOOK PRO properly?
    Can I have the OS on the same drives or does it need to be seperate?
    I mostly want to do this becuase I am having a lot of problems with the "spinning ball of death" and slow speeds.  I have my RAM maxed out at 6Gigs and my 7200rpm 750GB HD is about half full.
    Am I correct in trying to do an external RAID Drive to help with speed?
    If yes, what is the best way to do this and which type of connection (USB, Firewire, etc) is best to use?
    Thanks!

    Edward House
    Edward House
    Am I correct in trying to do an external RAID Drive to help with speed?
    No
    Why is my computer slow?

  • Replacing a hard drive of my RAID 5 system just ruined my OS X 10.6.8 server... help...

    My system is MacPro 2009 with 10.6.8 server and Apple RAID card. Last week, RAID util just notified me of one drive is not viable, so i decided to replace the drive today. The configuration of my system is...
    There is an Apple Raid Card for HW Raid system
    Bay 1 = 640 TB drive with Mac OS X 10.6.8 server installed
    Bay 2, 3, 4 = 1.5 TB drives set up as RAID 5
    below is what I did to replace the degraded Bay 4...
    1. I shut down the system
    2. replaced the corrupted drive with the new hard drive
    3. tried start the machine again...
    Now my machine refuses to start up with the blinking question mark... I guess that the system fails to recognize the new drive or cannot find the system files...
    4. So I put back the degraded drive...
    5. The machine still won't start...
    6. I tried to use the 10.6 server installation disk to boot up the machine to check if I can fix the system via disk util; but, everytime I do this, I got kernel panic...
    7. resetting PR Ram didn't help, cannot boot up via safe mode as well (since the system file is not accessible now, I guess...).
    8. booting via 10.6.2 server installation DVD still gives me kernel panic...
    Why would my system corrupt by just replacing one degrade drive? The Mac OS X is not even the part of the Raid system... How am I supposed to fix this issue with out the installation disk?
    This Apple Raid card is driving me nuts now...

    Something weird is definitely happening to my OS HD. Here is my updates to the problem.
    1. I just put the old corrupted HD into the Bay 4, and tried to restart the machine again.. still not bootable
    2. So I replaced the OS HD from the Bay 1 with a new blank 2TB WD green drive, and use the 10.6 server DVD to boot up the machine. This time I didn't get the kernel panic.
    3. Checked the RAID partition, everything is still intact, but the RAID utility is still complaining about Bay 4 being not viable...
    4. I replaced the blank drive from the Bay 1 again with the previously installed 10.6.8 server HD. This time the machine refused to boot up and threw that infamous folder with question mark error...
    5. So, I replace the bay 1 with blank HD, and installed the 10.6.0 server this time. The RAID partition is now initialized and can bee seen from the OS. RAID utility still complains about one disk being not viable. Now I am syncing and backing up all the data from the RAID 5 partition and try to figure out what is wrong here...
    More specifically, my current set up is...
    bay 1 = 2.0 TB JBOD+
    bay 2 = 1.5 TB registered to RAID 5, viable but degraded
    bay 3 = 1.5 TB registered to RAID 5, viable but degraded
    bay 4 = 1.5 TB registered to RAID 5, not viable
    The previous OS drive was also set up as JBOD+ to the RAID card, and was not supposed to be a part of the RAID system. I wonder why changing one drive at the Bay 4 did corrupt the system, though.
    Also, now I am a bit freaked out and do not dare to change any drive yet... How am I supposed to appropriately change the failed drive? Should I just shut down the system and remove the drive from Bay 4 like last time?

  • Do I need a fast system drive if i also have a RAID 0 array for media?

    If my video and media files are all on a Fast RAID array then do i need a fast system drive?
    Im building a system. The only thing on my system drive will be programs. And I will have a RAID array for my video and PSD files - but my System drive is an older UltraDMA EIDE133 250g Maxtor. This system drive is testing at 51mb/s Read, and 26mb/s write. (According to Blackmagic disk speed check program)
    A New SATA drive tests at 53 write and 43 read. So should i bother upgrading my system drive to a RAPTOR 150 or stick with the older EIDE drive? Main Programs i use are Adobe After effects, premiere pro, Photoshop for uncompressed editing with blackmagic intensity.
    Specs:
    MB: Tyan K8WE
    AMD Opteron 270 (dual)
    4GB RAM.
    Nvidia Quadro FX 560
    Apple cinema Display 30'
    4x500gb RAID array (2TB total) on Nvidia SATA motherboard controler.

    Jeron,
    Yes, you are probably.
    - Its i either spend $900 dollars or $200.
    The best possible Rig is this; I spend $500 dollars on a dedicated PCI-X RAID controller card. I buy a Raptor 150g system drive $200. And then buying another 3 drives to add to the RAID array of 2 disks i already have = $300.
    Or option 2: My motherboard (K8WE) has 4 SATA-II ports. So I could set up a 4 disk raid with what i have right now and be achieving 210+ mb/s read and write. My system drive would be off the IDE/133 channel. Then i would only have to spend $200 on 2 disks.
    I have been trying to decipher if it is logical to spend that much more money - when it is possible i will only achieve maybe 50 more Megabytes a second. - and have windows and programs start faster.
    A part of me says - "any time i try to save money on something it comes with calamity and disaster". vs. a part of me that says - "you could get more bang for your buck".

  • CPU upgrades, RAIDing system drive, and more

    Final Cut Studio user... editing on an iMac is murder... need more power Scotti! I intend to buy a Mac Pro next week, either BTO or retail, not sure yet!
    I know that CPUs on Mac Pro's are socketed and not soldered. Yipee! Is it confirmed that CPUs are truly upgradable? My usual Mac vendor wasn't convinced.
    I know it's possible to RAID 0 or 1 data drives, but is it possible to RAID 0 the system drive? I was thinking about getting a couple of Raptor drives for a performance increase. Also I imagine that the current BootCamp won't be able to manage that.
    Speaking of Bootcamp, can Windows be on another drive other then on a partition of the system drive?
    My same Mac vendor seemed to think that Bluetooth and AirPort are only BTO and not upgradable (even from a certified repair center). But I see posts that say otherwise. What's the concensus on this?
    Will be using existing CRTs off my old PC for now. I assume that any standard DVI-VGA adaptor will do? Or are there variations in those adaptors that I need to be aware of?
    iMac G5 20, 1.8GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

    Is it confirmed that CPUs are truly upgradable?
    Given the socket nature it's potentially possible. Until there's are actually chips out there to actually try it no-one really knows if it's possible or even worthwhile.
    but is it possible to RAID 0 the system drive?
    Yes.
    Speaking of Bootcamp, can Windows be on another drive other then on a partition of the system drive?
    Yes… any internal drive.
    My same Mac vendor seemed to think that Bluetooth and AirPort are only BTO and not upgradable
    Yes they are upgradeable after purchase but is a service centre job. While it is probably possible to do the job yourself you would still need to source the part.
    I assume that any standard DVI-VGA adaptor will do?
    Yes, the Mac comes with at least one DVI to VGA adapter.

  • Setting up RAID for a drive with user folders on it!

    We have one hard drive for user data, partitioned into 2 volumes, IDHome and IDData. IDHome contains the home directory for all the users. IDData is shared network data. I want to set up a Raid 1 array for this entire drive, however it seems that you cant do this on the fly without erasing both drives. Ive got a second identical drive, but when I try to create the array in Disk Utility, it wants to erase both drives. That would be a catastrophy of monumental proportions!
    Everything from the original drive is backed up, so Im not affraid of losing anything. But I dont even want to go there.
    Hers my main qustion. If no users are connected to the server and I backup the original HD, set up the Raid array (thus erasing both drives), then copy everything back onto the array, are users going to be able to log in as if nothing happened? Is OS X going to care that /Volumes/IDHome is no longer on /dev/disk1 and instead on the Raid array now (/dev/disk2 I guess)? Is OS X looking for specific hard drives or just at /Volumes/IDHome?
    Ive read a couple of articles on the internet about using the command line diskutils to first enable one drive as a raid array, making the computer think the array exists, then adding a second drive to the array and "rebuilding" the array... but I go back to my original question, is osx going to care that /volumes/idhome isnt technically on /dev/disk1.
    I tried to test diskutil enableRaid mirror /dev/disk2 (/dev/disk2 is a backup drive we have installed on the server), but I got an error message saying the syntax needed to be in diskutil enableRaid mirror /Volumes/VolumeName format...it wanted /Volumes in stead of /dev is guess.

    You can't partition an Apple software raid drive.

  • How do I set up my G Raid external hard drive on my iMac

    just bought a brand new G Raid external hard drive to act as my time machine back up and external storage source for music and film. I have no idea how to set it up and to get things rolling I have simply plugged it in.
    any suggestions?

    Matt cool...
    the G Raid drive has worked perfectly then it is my understanding that is rather limited
    so I have a 4T drive which means that I have two drives of 2T
    as this is acting as my Time Lapse on my iMac which gives me an automatic back up every 10 mins at the moment which I am guessing is to regular and I can change this?
    Therefore I should buy a further drive (in spain at the apple store cost is 350 euros) and on this drive I should store all my content music and film as I should have a minimum of data stored on teh internal hard drive on the iMac itself to improve functionality?
    does the same apply for my MacBook Pro? this is a mobile solution for film and music (final cut pro and logic) or do I use a solution that does not need an external power source?
    any suggestion welcome

  • What is the best way to set up my RAID? (8Core MacPro with 2x1TB HDD) + (1x2TB External G-RAID)

    EQUIPMENT:
    Spring 2011 MacPro OSX-10.6.8
    8-Core (2 x 2.4 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon)
    Memory: 16GB 1066 MHz DDR3
    RAID:
      PCI Slot:          Slot-4
      Hardware Version:          2.00
      Firmware Version:          E-1.3.2.0
      Expansion ROM Version:          0018
      Shutdown Status:          Normal shutdown
      Write Cache Enabled:          Yes
    +
    2TB G-Technology G-RAID External Hard Drive
    2 x Firewire 800, 1 x eSATA, 1 x USB 2.0
    Self Powered DC-IN
    I know RAID basically lets different drives work together to work more efficiently, especially with large files.
    I use my MacPro for video editing for motion pictures, using both Final Cut and Avid Media Composer (also have Adobe Premier because it came with CS5, but have yet to try it). I also use ProTools to score the films.
    QUESTION:
    I would like to know what you amazing MacPeople think I should do. I know there are multiple setups for RAID, and I obviously intend on one day having all 4-hard drive bays in use, but only ordered 2 initially when I built it. I also have the G-RAID external. I am in a position where I could partition my G-RAID external to backup both the hard drives, but I have only been using it as a way to bring my media with me when I was going to edit in the lab, but now I do everything at home. I would like to keep it as my travel drive, but let me know what you guys think. I obviously want to put it to the best use possible. I have a 500GIG slow external that I can use too, but I want to get my processor performance as fast as possible. When I edit now, it seems like I am not getting the full potention of my $7,000 MacPro (+ the $1000 Display).
    Thank you in advance for your insight.
    -RaphSai

    I think you got no rsponses because the question you asked is too broad.
    The single biggest performance payback on a Mac Pro (that is not compute-bound and has enough RAM) is to establish a Boot Drive -- with System, Library, Applications, and the hidden unix files on its own drive.
    This keeps Mac OS X Virtual Memory system from wrecking the performance of regular file access -- whether you have the User files on a RAID or not.
    Most Mac OS X Applications are built like pre-paged paging files. They are similar to the stuff already on the Boot Volume, and some are cranky if they are not on the Boot Volume.
    As Mac OS X runs, and applications run, they take a different path through the software and find that the code needed to do a certain function is not present, and must be "paged" in.
    You want that activity not to interfere with reading big Source files or writing big Destination files. Mac OS and Applications "snacking" moves the drive heads away -- and they take 20 milliseconds to get where they are going, a spin or two of the Hard drive at 10 milliseconds a spin to read, and 20 milliseconds or so to get back to work. All that is dead time before you can get more data to proceed.
    Next is to set it up so that reading Source files does not compete with writing Destination files, such as having a separate Volume for destination files.

  • Setting up a RAID 0 between the Mini's internal HD and an external

    Would it be possible to set up a RAID 0 between two hard drive, one being the internal drive of the MacMini and the other being an external firewire drive?
    Would these two drive have to be configured outside of the computer in external enclosure and then one transplanted into the mac mini, or will the operating system allow this to be set up between the two drive?

    Yes you can RAID the internal Mac mini 2.5" hard drive with a FireWire external, but a striped RAID set is always limited by the speed of the slowest drive and the size of the smallest drive.
    As such I would not expect much of a performance gain and you would have to erase your internal drive to create the striped RAID set while booting from a 3rd drive to setup the RAID0.
    Using a FW boot drive will give you increased performance. You can see details here:
    http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/wiebetech/max/
    Or if you really want to speed up the Mac mini read about the AMUG Super-mini project which uses 3.5" SATA hard drives. It was tested in single and RAID0 configurations on the internal ATA/100 IDE bus of the Mac mini
    http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/addonics/mini/
    Michael

  • RAID for OS drive failing

    I jumped through the correct hoops to make this work once, and was fully up and running for a month or so. Then a Windows Critical Update (x3) caused blue screens to appear several times a day. At one point, I went into the BIOS and reset to all defaults. Which I think removed the "magic" that had allowed my two RAID-striped SSDs to act as a single logical system drive, fed by the two 6GB/s SATA cables from the MB. When it was working, it was blazingly fast! Sadly, the guru that led me through the whole setup the first time is no longer here.
    The failure mode: very long wait with B4 in lowest righthand part of black screen. Then the MSI image flashes for an instant and black screen again, saying only "Missing operating system".
    I've booted off the Win 7 Ult. installation DVD and reinstalled both the iaAHCI and iastor drivers. Under Advanced Boot options, Intel(R) Rapid Start Technology is Enabled. But I suspect there's something else I need to do in the BIOS with Rapid Start. The same screen where you enable RST says "No valid iFFS partition found." Not sure what that means.
    Can anyone please help me?
    Thanks.

    Thanks for the note. It was just enough info to get me over the hump. I had to search the BIOS to find the place to set the HD mode to "RAID", but after a few minutes I found it. Thanks for the tip!
    Sorry about not following the posting guidelines, I've been fighting a bad cold, but that's no excuse. I have a Z77A-G41 with an Intel i5-3570 Sandybridge CPU. No GPU. 16GB RAM, Win 7 Ultimate. Now I'm keeping my fingers crossed that I don't get a recurrance of the many blue screens-a-day problem that brought on the meltdown in the first place. 
    Cheers!

  • Is there any value in partitioning the system drive?

    I've always set up my computer with a system drive for the OS and Programs and then a RAID 0 for video capture.
    However, I found this link which suggests that it might be better to partition the "system drive" for better performance.  Does anybody partition, their system drive?
    http://partition.radified.com/partitioning_2.htm
    John Rich

    NO !!!
    One physical drive has one set of read/write heads
    When you partition a drive, that one set of read/write heads now has to do double the work to navigate two areas
    The only time you might want to partition a drive is to have a dual boot... and then each OS is completely separate from the other and that set of read/write heads is still only working in one space

  • Windows 7 slow to boot after setting up windows backup to additional drive.

    I have an issue with windows taking forever to boot after setting up Windows backup.
    PC Setup:
    2 Samsung SSD Mirrored for Hardware raid on (MOBO OS/Programs)
    2 Seagate 4TB Mirrored for Hardware raid (Data storage)
    1 Seagate 4tb HD used solely for Windows backup.  (Have also tried with multiple other drives with same outcome.)
    If I have all drives connected without setting up the Windows Backup, system will boot up in 37 seconds.  As soon as I enable the backup to the additional drive, it kills the boot time.  Brings boot time to over 2.5 mins.  Brand new PC, clean
    installation, no antivirus or any other software that could be slowing it down.  If drive is just in PC as an extra drive there seems to be no issue, just as soon as I enable the Windows Backup to additional drive. Never noticed this issue on any other
    PC

    Log booting process (set it in F8 menu).
    Regards
    Milos

  • RAID for secondary drives?

    Hey all, I was just curious about something.  I have a KT3-Ultra2 with RAID but have never used RAID before.  I got this board because I thought I'd try it.
    My system runs off a 30 gig drive, but I thought it would be nice to have mirrored raid drives to store all my music, about 15 gigs.  As it is a home computer I have no reason really to back up my whole system like this, just my music.
    So I'm curious, if I get the drives to set up my raid array, can I still boot and run my system off my current drive, leaving it as a single drive on the normal IDE connector, and use a raid array for just for backup?  Or if I set up the raid, will I have to boot from it?
    Thanks in advance-

    you can do it way you want
    install raid drivers on current drive
    http://www.amdforums.com/showindex.php?s=&threadid=146384

Maybe you are looking for

  • AP Payment Clearance

    I have a question about AP payment, when I create a new payment, the payment status is always "negotiable" which means I'll see it in the bank statement in Cash Management Module to clear it. but the case here this payment is cash, and I don't need t

  • I am in report 1 i want to execute report2 in background .

    Hi, I am in report program 1 i want to execute the report program2 in backgound and iam passing some selection screen parameters . user should not know about the running of this program2. i tried using submiit but iam seeing the result of report 2 in

  • Getting error System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: Server did not r

    I am trying to acces my web service using this code Call call = new Call (); SOAPMappingRegistry soap = new SOAPMappingRegistry(); call.setTargetObjectURI ("http://tempuri.org/"); call.setMethodName ("EarnNValue"); Vector params = new Vector (); para

  • Multi-Server Monitor log outs repeatedly

    I recently installed ColdFusion Enterprise 10 and set up 3 instances on the same server and then set up multi server monitoring for my three instances. The problem is logging into one CF admin on one port logs you out of the other. This appears to be

  • Itunes driving me crazy

    i have a brand new (2005) gateway laptop. itunes will not recognize any cd's. when i put the cd in the computer, itunes opens, it says "accessing gracenote CDDB" and when it's done processing nothing shows up in my library or anywhere else in itunes.