AP Payment Clearance

I have a question about AP payment, when I create a new payment, the payment status is always "negotiable" which means I'll see it in the bank statement in Cash Management Module to clear it. but the case here this payment is cash, and I don't need to see it in cash management to be cleared.
We have this option in AR to make a cleared receipts, is there an option like that in AP? or is there any work around to do so?
Thanks in advance...

thanks James for your comments.
Actually I'm using R12. About payable bank document setup or any other setup, I have no problem to do it however you ask me to do just to get this requirement done.

Similar Messages

  • Payment Clearance Report

    Hi Experts,
    Can anyone point me to a report I can use in SAP B1 2007A PL45 where I can see how quickly customer payment are cleared following the due date of an invoice.
    Ideally it would show:
    On Due Date - Qty and %age of total
    2 to 5 Days - Qty and %age of total
    6 to 10 days - Qty and %age of total
    11 to 20 days - Qty and %age of total
    21 to 30 days - Qty and %age of total
    31 to 60 days - Qty and %age of total
    > 60 Days
    Many Thanks
    Geoff

    Hi Gordon
    The Qty means the quantity of documents which are cleared in the time specified - the percentage is what percentage that figure is of the total.
    thanks
    Geoff

  • F-53  payment clearance Exchange Rate Difference

    HI
    There is a exchange rate problem while clearing Purchase Order.  In Freight condition  P/o is Total amount in $ is 819.77 while theexchange rate is Rs/$= 86 which is ok at vendor invoice level .
    Problem area is F-53 when we clear payment system pick old rate which is Rs/$ =61.0299.
    it giving problem for only one vendor.
    thanks
    thomas

    Hi,
    Check in po header whter exch rate fixed tick box is ticked.
    Regards

  • Query for Vendor Payment in SAP

    Hello All,
    I am a sap abap developer with little knowledge in SAP MM and SAP FI modules.
    As per some requirement of my company ,i have created a PO then its GR and finally IR.
    Now when i checked EKBE table (History per Purchasing Document) , i found two record in this table out of which one with
    VGABE = 1 (Good Receipt) & another with  VGABE = 2 (Invoice Receipt) .
    Now my requirement is ,i want a entry in this table with VGABE = 5 (Payment) but i don't know how to do payment of vendor in sap so that this table will populate with a entry for payment type.
    Please help me and let me know what will be the flow with tcodes to do the vendor payment in sap.
    Please reply ASAP.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards.
    Abhinav Goel.

    Hello Mr.Raman,
    Thanks for your response to my query.
    As per my company requirement i have to track duplicate payment made to the vendor against same PO.
    So for that after completing the cycle PR-PO-GR-IR-F-53 finally i found two records in BSAK table out of which :
    One record was  with my accounting document no from my invoice receipt of type RE.
    Another record was with the vendor payment clearance document with type KZ.
    Now again i have done payment to the vendor using F-53 tcode and now i found one more record with belnr = last payment document no and augbl = new payment document no. with type KZ.
    So if i use below mentioned logic to track for duplicate payments made to the vendor ,then it will be fine or if not can you suggests me the needful changes in the logic.
    1.) Check If record exists for my belnr no from invoice recipt in bsak.
    2.) Take AUGBL No for this BELNR No and check if record exists for this AUGBL with type KZ.
    Note:Means payment is done to the vendor upto this logic.
    3.) Now if with the found record with type KZ any other record found with type KZ it can be taken of as duplicate payment made to the vendor.
    Please suggest me if above mentioned logic is fine.
    Regards.
    Abhinav Goel.

  • Payment clearing on amount with mismatching business areas

    Hi, gurus:
    We recently activated AR module under 4.6c.
    We use automatic clearing which calls FB1D, based on amount match between the cash receipt and the invoice. 
    The invoice comes with an business area, but the cash receipt record (RM doc type) has a blank business area. 
    The payment will clear, but SAP actually creates a new WO record to clear the invoice.  The WO record contains the business area from the invoice.
    The RM cash receipt record has no business area after the payment clearance.  This creates a problem for us during reporting for the business area, and the new WO record also screws up the real WO amount in our Write-Off reports.
    Is there a user exit in FB1D(SAPMF05A) that would allow us to add the business area to the RM record during payment clearance, and avoid the creation of the WO record ?
    Thanks.

    May be you can use Substitutions:
    http://webmailmty.softtek.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/5b/d231a843c611d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Regards.

  • AP tables

    Hi Experts,
    1. From purchase to Vendor payment flow which one is correct ...
    PR ->PO (ME23N) -> GRN (MIGO) -> Invoice verification (MIRO) -> AP Vendor invoice (FB60) -> Payment clearance (F-53)
    (OR)
    PR -> PO (ME23N) -> GRN (MIGO) -> AP Vendor invoice (FB60) -> Payment clearance (F-53).
    If there is any correction in the flow , please let me know.
    2. AP invoice and payment will be stored in which SAP TABLES?
    3.  BAPI  "BAPI_ACC_GL_POSTING_POST " is similar to FB60 or any other BAPI is available for this TCODE?
    4.  BAPI  "POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING" is similar to F-53 or any other BAPI is available for this TCODE?
    Advance Thanks.

    Hi Geeta,
    What you want to develop ? Ageing report or something else. please elaborate your requirement.

  • Acconts payable Flow

    Hi Experts,
    1.       From purchase to Vendor payment flow which one is correct  ...
      PR ->PO (ME23N) -> GRN (MIGO) -> Invoice verification (MIRO) -> AP Vendor invoice (FB60) -> Payment clearance (F-53)
                                                     (OR)
       PR -> PO (ME23N) -> GRN (MIGO) ->  AP Vendor invoice (FB60) -> Payment clearance (F-53).
    If there is any correction in the flow , please let me know.
    2. AP invoice and payment will be stored in which SAP TABLES?
    Thanks.

    Purchase to Vendor Payment flow is as below:
    With MM Integration:
    Purchase Requisition (ME51N) ---> Purchase Order ---> Down Payment Request >( F-47) - Down Payment (F-48 )--> Goods Receipt (MIGO) -- Invoice Report (MIRO) ---> Down Payment Clearing --> Final Payment (F-53/F110)
    Without MM Integration:
    Finance Invoice Posting (FB-60 )---> Post with Clearing  F-53/  Automaitc Payment PostingF110 --
    Table to check check Vendor Cleared document : BSAK, where you can find clearing document against invoice documents

  • Text Field is Blank in Transaction F-28

    Hi Experts,
    There is a requirement to add to the current layout the text field in F-28 transaction code. However, when I add them as an administrator, The text field is blank. We already maintained the text field in both Accounting Document Line item and in the Invoice but still the text field is blank. Where can we find the value of text field in the documents shown in F-28. Are there any configuration to do this?

    Ok. Currently they had this problem on tagging which Invoices to be considered for payment clearance in tcode F-28. Their current process is every Ship-To-Party, they also equate it as one project code with the location of the project information,etc. They are using this ever since the first implementation. So in their process, they go to FBL5N to check those invoices created before going to F-28. In FBL5N, I incorporated the text field there (filled by user-exit display) which also came from the accounting document. But it's not correct since they are using the ship-to-party value in F-28.
    So we tested by manual input directly the Ship-To-Party Code to Acc Doc Line Item Text Field. It went to FBL5N, as showing the value there but in F-28 it is not showing.
    Do you have any solution for this? Since during payment in F-28, I think these entries are already Acc Doc Entries and Ship-To-Party is not reflected here but Payer only (coming from the invoice).

  • Query for purchasing accrual in 12i

    Hi
    We have migrated to 12i ,the references in gl_import_references are no more updated after 12 i upgrade.
    Please find the 11i query,we need to change it to 12i using xla tables.
    SELECT
    gl_ledgers.NAME AS book_name,
           gl_periods.period_year AS fiscal_year,
           DECODE (gl_periods.quarter_num,
                   1, '1st QTR',
                   2, '2nd QTR',
                   3, '3rd QTR',
                   4, '4th QTR'
                  ) AS quarter,
           gl_periods.period_num AS period_number,
           gl_je_headers.period_name AS period_name,
           gl_je_headers.je_source AS SOURCE,
           gl_je_headers.je_category AS CATEGORY,
           gl_code_combinations.segment1 AS company,
           gl_code_combinations.segment2 AS cost_center,
           gl_code_combinations.segment3 AS ACCOUNT,
           gl_code_combinations.segment4 AS program,
           gl_code_combinations.segment5 AS future,
           po_distributions_all.expenditure_type AS expenditure_type,
           po_distributions_all.expenditure_item_date AS expenditure_date,
           gl_je_lines.accounted_dr, gl_je_lines.accounted_cr,
           po_distributions_all.quantity_delivered AS pa_quantity, 'Accrual' TYPE,
           DECODE (gl_code_combinations.segment2,
                   '0000', 'BS',
                   'PL'
                  ) AS ledger_type,
           ap_suppliers.vendor_name,
           gl_je_lines.reference_4 AS po_number,
           gl_je_lines.description
      FROM gl.gl_je_headers,
           gl.gl_je_lines,
           gl.gl_ledgers,
           gl.gl_code_combinations,
           po.po_distributions_all,
           po.po_headers_all,
           gl.gl_periods,
           ap.ap_suppliers
    WHERE gl_je_headers.je_source = 'Cost Management' --Changed to Cost Management
       AND gl_je_headers.je_header_id = gl_je_lines.je_header_id
       AND gl_je_headers.ledger_id = gl_ledgers.ledger_id
       AND gl_code_combinations.code_combination_id =
                                                   gl_je_lines.code_combination_id
       AND gl_code_combinations.segment3 <> '23004'
       AND po_distributions_all.po_header_id(+) =
                       TO_NUMBER (RTRIM (SUBSTR (gl_je_lines.reference_2, 1, 10)))
       AND po_distributions_all.po_distribution_id =
                       TO_NUMBER (RTRIM (SUBSTR (gl_je_lines.reference_3, 1, 10)))
       AND po_distributions_all.po_header_id = po_headers_all.po_header_id
       AND po_headers_all.vendor_id = ap_suppliers.vendor_id
       AND gl_je_headers.period_name = gl_periods.period_name
    Can someone help us

    Hello Mr.Raman,
    Thanks for your response to my query.
    As per my company requirement i have to track duplicate payment made to the vendor against same PO.
    So for that after completing the cycle PR-PO-GR-IR-F-53 finally i found two records in BSAK table out of which :
    One record was  with my accounting document no from my invoice receipt of type RE.
    Another record was with the vendor payment clearance document with type KZ.
    Now again i have done payment to the vendor using F-53 tcode and now i found one more record with belnr = last payment document no and augbl = new payment document no. with type KZ.
    So if i use below mentioned logic to track for duplicate payments made to the vendor ,then it will be fine or if not can you suggests me the needful changes in the logic.
    1.) Check If record exists for my belnr no from invoice recipt in bsak.
    2.) Take AUGBL No for this BELNR No and check if record exists for this AUGBL with type KZ.
    Note:Means payment is done to the vendor upto this logic.
    3.) Now if with the found record with type KZ any other record found with type KZ it can be taken of as duplicate payment made to the vendor.
    Please suggest me if above mentioned logic is fine.
    Regards.
    Abhinav Goel.

  • Where are defined in SAP bank clearance clauses / foreign currency payment?

    Hi All,
    with reference to foreign money transfer, I'd like to know where are defined in SAP the bank clearance clause (foreign currency payment).
    Thanks

    Hello,
    This is the classical payment medium payment program for Italy.
    You must have defined this in FBZP transaction code.
    Payment methods in country.
    Double click on your country & Payment method.
    You must have defined at
    Use classic payment medium programs (RFFO*)
    Base on this your file gets generated and saved on to a secured directory.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Clearance without payment of duty

    This may be under Bond or LUTor SEZ scheme.What is the selection criteria for this. Please clarify.

    Hi
    This is required for to update the RG1 Register for finished goods. This is a statutory register for submitting to excise department

  • Report for conversion payment of vendor against grn quantity.

    Dear all,
    In our scenario, we are doing conversion payment of vendor against SCO (subcontracting order) on the basis of GRN quantity. But,  I am unable to found that how much conversion payments are pending  against grn quantity in one month. Is there any report to found or any other process except  through purchase order history of any order. Plz help me.
    Thanks & regards
    Rahul

    HI,
    first thing payment not update in Po history and its sap standard.because you pay give payment to vendor against two different PO.
    for that you have to open MIRO means invoice document and check in that clearance document is there or not.
    if clearance document means payment is done.in report ME80FN  execute  that report and then select change icon from header
    and then select Po history
    now you will get report PO-MIGO-MIRO
    now click on miro then open account document and check clearing document there for invoice .
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Issue Regarding Payment recived by cheque

    Dear all
    Business Process:
    Sales team pass the Invoice Entry & Billing Entry. Collection of Cheque
    from Customer is also done by the Sales Team. After that they maintain
    an Excel Sheet containing Bill Number & Cheque details and send it to
    the Finance Team for clearance. Further the Finance department tracks
    the cheque payment and does the clearing.
    Requirement:
    Finance Department wants Sales people to tag the Cheque details with
    the Billing Document, So that they can avoid the dependency on Excel
    Sheet. The system should itself propose all details of cheque receipt
    against respective Billing Document.
    Thanks
    Jayashree

    Thanks for the response.
    i believe the requirement can not be fulfilled.
    Regards
    Sachin

  • In F110 I getting error No valid Payment method found but i did

    While doing intercompany clearance using Pay methd Y in F110 payment run in payment proposal system showing error "No valid payment method found" this is showing in vendor line item and if i am clicking customer line item showing debit bal still exit because system not picking my pay mthd Y in vendor line item which one i assigned in vendor master data. But for another vendor its posting clearing this error occur only for particular vendor. Any can help me to rectify my error.

    Hello,
    We were get the same error message and found that the solution was that the vendor must have an address.
    In OBVU, Payment method / country, the required master record specs had Street checked on.  This reqiured an address for the vendor.  Once we entered an address the F110 payment run was successful for this vendor.
    Rgds,
    Dan

  • Due date payment restriction during manual payment posting

    Hi Team.
    We have a requirement to pay bills only after the due date is over,and not before that.
    For Ex :- If i have payment terms of 30 days and i am booking invoice on 1st of mar then due date would be 31st of mar.
    our requirement is to pay this bill only on or after this 31st march.user should not allowed to post any payment entry before 31st march.
    Can some one please give the settings required for achieving this requirement during manual payment entry..
    appreciate your help..
    Thanks
    Vinai

    Hi Vinai,
    Sorry for giving confusion..It is as simple as below.
    1). Manual payment should happen only after  the invoice is due....and that too for only one vendor.rest of all vendors should be able to pay as usual before due dates. so we are creating one new payment term for particular vendor and trying to restrict the payment by creating validation.
    2). And this restriction should also apply when vendor is configured as customer.
    For Ex :- If vendor invoice value is 10,000 where i need to pay, and he is also a customer and has sale value 1000 which i need to receive.
    net balance is 9000.
    during this vendor & customer clearance also the due date calculation should work.
    Please help in building validation logic or any BADI , EXIT' s at lease for first one..
    Thanks
    Vinai

Maybe you are looking for