Settings in Actual Goods Issue Date for Delivery Document

Hi Masters,
We have a Requirement in Which the client wants that while Creating Delivery Document through VL01N the Actual PGI Date Entered should not be before the Panned GI Date it should be only After the Planned GI Date. If the user Tries to Enter the Actual GI Date which is before the Planned GI Date the System should not Accept it and should give and Error.Please tell how to Configure this.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
Pls make use of Status profile for the user as well as maintain proper schedule lines
regards
DSR

Similar Messages

  • What is the difference between delivery date and actual goods issue date?

    Hi ,
    Can you please tell me the difference between Delivery date and Actual goods issue date ?
    Delivery data can be be greater than goods issue date?
    Thanks,
    Ajay

    Hi Ajay,
                  Delivery date means its the original date on which the delivery should be done.Actual goods Issue date is the date on which goods to be delivered according to the purchase order.There can be delay in the delivery so we maintain 2 objects.
    Yes delivery date can be greater than Goods Issue date.
    Hope this clears
    Regards
    Karthik

  • Want to change Del Date and Goods Issue date in Delivery scdl tab of PO

    Hi Gurus,
    I am in a situation wherein i need to change the Goods Issue date in Delivery schedule tab of Purchase Order and make it equivalent to Delivery date in the same tab.
    Currently the Goods issue date that is taken by default will always be one day after the Delivery date.
    Where is the control for this???
    Regards,
    Trishul

    Hi Jürgen,
    Thanks for your response. You are right. The Process is STO.
    The delivery has not been created as yet.  Everything is happening while creating the PO. The settings are such that the delivery date will be taken by the system automatically by doing the Availability check and simultaneously the goods issue date will be updated. But it will be one day later to the delivery date. But i want this to be same.
    Incase if i change the Goods Issue date manually, this is the message i get "Goods issue cannot be carried out in the past"
    Message no. V1062
    Please let me know if i am not clear.
    Regards,
    Trishul
    Edited by: Trishul Das on Mar 17, 2009 4:09 PM

  • Collective Invoice - Actual Goods Issue date

    Hi Friends,
    Collective invoice topic has been discussed many times but I didn't find exact solution to solve my issue.
    From sap help and few other threads it is learnt that Billing type, Billing date, Payer, Billing unit, Terms of payment, Incoterms, Letter of credit should be same to have collective invoice. During my tests it is understood that apart from those Actual Goods Issue date (Post Goods Issue) date should be same to have collective invoice for different sales orders/deliveries. In my tests SAP didn't consider Billing date but it did consider Actual GI date. In other words, even the billing date and other requirements are same invoice split happend due to different Actual GI date. However collective invoice created even though the billing date is different but Actual GI date is same.
    My user creates one sales order and one delivery for a customer once in a week (so 4 orders/deliveries in a month) and creates Invoice by end of the month with collective invoice. So based on the above tests I can ask the user to create sales orders, deliveries every week but perform Post Goods Issue month end and then create invoice so that collective invoice can be done. But the issue is they want to do the Post Goods Issue every week because the stock levels should reduce on weekly basis. So how can we create collective invoice even though the Post Goods Issue is done weekly (so Actual GI date will be different)
    Any idea? Please let me know if further information required.
    Thank you

    Hi,
    You may consider writing a routine under copying requirements so that invoice is not split even if the Actual GI date is different.
    Consider the following [thread|Collective billing; for more info.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Actual goods issue date required to be equal to planned goods issue date

    Hi All,
    Can anybody tell me on what basis does the actual goods issue date get determined and what needs to be done if we want to restrict the actuall goods issue date to be equal to the planned goods issue date?
    Avinash

    Avinash,
    Can anybody tell me on what basis does the actual goods issue date get determined
    ???? It is the date that the goods are actually issued from stock, e.g. whatever the date was when the delivery was actually issued, that is the date that is normally written to this field in the delivery.
    what needs to be done if we want to restrict the actual goods issue date to be equal to the planned goods issue date
    That's a pretty restrictive criteria.  Basically, you are telling the warehouse that they are not able to issue the goods early or late.  In companies I have seen, that would constitute a lot of deliveries.  Hope your customers don't need the parts....
    Anyhow, the restriction would have to be against the goods issue transactions being used by the warehouse.  I don't believe there is any standard configuration that creates such a restriction, so it would require custom development.  If you pursue this restriction, make sure you leave yourself some kind of override.
    In many companies, this problem is handled through policy and procedure.  Warehouse manager simply creates a policy about early and late goods issues.  The system will track discrepancies in the case the policy is not followed.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Fieldes planned delivery date and actual good recipt date for SAP QUERY

    Hi Gurus
    I am changing sap query. I need to find two fieldes  : planned delivery date and actual goods recipt date
    I dont know MM tables, do you know wrhere are?
    in table EKPO i don't find the fieldes.
    Thanks in advance

    Thank a lot!
    Regards

  • New planned goods issue date during delivery creation due to changed route

    Hello All,
    I have defined 2 routes with different values for transit time and transporation lead times. I have configured routes such that in order creation - route A is determined and while delivery creation due to weight group - delivery B is determined.
    Now for Route A i have maintained transit time of 3 days and Transportation lead time of 4 days and for Route B it is 1 day each.
    Delivery scheduling is active for the order type.
    Now when i create the order with a delivery date of say 05/24/2010 then (route A with transit time of 3 days) is determined and the planned goods issue date of 05/21/2010 is in the order.
    Now while creating delivery (Route B which has transit time 1 day) is determined due to the weight group. But the planned goods issue date is still the same 05/21/2010 as in order.
    I am assuming that since the route B has a route of 1 day so the planned goods issue date should be re-determined to 05/23/2010? IS there no scheduling done during delivery creation even though route and subsequently transit time has changed?
    Please let me know the answer to this...
    Thanks
    Shobhit

    Hi ,
    You can use TA - MASS . Enter object type - BUS2032(for sales orders) on initial screen and select sales item data.
    Next screen enter selection fields like sales order no and items. After giving order no and item range , execute and enter all new values for any item data fields. After pressing button "carry out mass change", don't forget to press save button.

  • Delta not generated in case of Actual Goods Issue date change in R3

    Hi Gurus
    In our implementation in BI Production server we are using 2LIS_12_VCHDR and  2LIS_12_VCITM
    extractors where in R3 Deliveries are created first and then the PGI is done. While in BI Extractions As the data comes first time without any issue but when the PGI is done the PGI date Tech Name (WADAT_IST) gets updated in the R3 system but in RSA 7 too this delta is not getting generated. can any one tell the probable reason.
    We are stuck there Early help needed.
    Thanks
    Shivani

    Hi Shivani,
    did you manage to solve your problem?
    We are facing a similar issue:
    - We also have both datasources active: 2LIS_12_VCITM and 2LIS_12_VCHDR
    - In R/3 the following steps happened: A delivery was created and the record has issued to BW --> In PSA a request with status of good issue movement = A (correct!).
    - Afterwards in R/3 the delivery has been picked and then, after 1 second, issued.
    - This time the requests on the two datasource look different: in 2LIS_12_VCITM it seems like the good issue delta comes before the picking delta, so the result is that the delivery is read as still open (status of good issue movement = A Not correct!). In 2LIS_12_VCHDR, instead, is all correct: the last record in PSA refers to the good issue delta.
    Change documents order in R/3 is correct, but it is not the same as the sequence in PSA of 2LIS_12_VCITM.
    Can anyone help me?
    Thanks in advance
    Roberta

  • Change goods Issue date and delivery date

    while crating Sales document through VA01
    i want  to replace goods issue date (VBEP-WADAT ) with my Z calender date.
    so that delivery date(ETDAT) aslo should chaged automatically ( bcz iof the change in goods isuue date ).
    how to achive this ?
    i tryied in  Program    program of MV45AFZZ/ MV45AFZB in the User Exists mentioned below:
    1.     Form Userexit_Check_VBEP
    2.     Form userexit_move_field_to_vbep
    i was able to change goods issue date (VBEP-WADAT )  but  not refleting in output screen,..
    regards,
    ramesh

    Hi Venkat,
      Even it did not update in my user exit when I update from VBEP-WADAT.  So, I did back calculation (considering route lead time) and updated Delivery date field VBEP-EDATU.  It is simple.  I have given the sample code as below.
       if lines( xvbap[] ) = 1 and VBEP-ETENR = '0001' and            "Calculate RDD while the first line item entered
         vbap-route <> space and <<your GI date>> is not initial.    "Only when header RSD is filled
          select single TRAZTD into ws_traztd from tvro
                where route = vbap-route.
          ws_days = ws_traztd / 24 / 10000.
          if ws_days <> 0.    "Only when Transp. Lead time is maintained ( So, will not affect other entities )
             select single FABKL into ws_fabkl from T001W
                where WERKS = vbap-werks.
             CALL FUNCTION 'WDKAL_DATE_ADD_FKDAYS'       "Calculate as per Factory calender
                 EXPORTING
                   i_date        = <<your GI date>>
                   i_fkday       = ws_days
                   i_fabkl       = ws_fabkl
                 IMPORTING
                   E_DATE        = ws_date
                  E_FKDAY       =
                 EXCEPTIONS
                    ERROR         = 1
                    OTHERS        = 2
             IF sy-subrc = 0.
                VBEP-EDATU = vbak-vdatu.   "copy to the first line item
             ENDIF.
          endif.
        endif.    "Route days

  • Partial Goods Issue against a Delivery Document

    Dear Xperts,
    I am having a scenario regarding standard Stock Transport Process with Delivery(Material Movement 641).
    My requirement is, when I will create a Stock Transport Order the Delivery document will automatically be created at the same time.This can be achieved thru customization.
    But the problem is , the material quantity in the delivery document will be same as the order quantity in PO.My question is :
    1. Can the user change the quantity in delivery which is automatically got created at the time of PO creation.
    2. If yes, then for the remaining order quantities , shall the system will automatically create another delivery?
    3. If no, can we do partial goods issue against that delivery if total material is not available at sending plant?If yes , how to configure?
    Means , In delivery my material qty is 10, can I do Post Goods Issue of leass than 10 qty & create a proforma invoice against that delivery and do the P.G.I. and Billing again against that delivery?
    Plz advice.
    Regards,
    Soumick

    Hi
    As per your scenario you can do the PGI (post goods issue ) for partial quantity only if u required later for reaming quantity when ever stock is available that time you can do again PGI by using the same delivery no for reaming quantity but for this
    In PO you have unchecked the Delivery  completed indicator with   this when ever complete goods are coming then only PO will
    be close up to that PO will be in open Status
    Regards
    Balaraju

  • Actual Goods Issue date and Planned Goods Issue date

    Dear All
    we are loading the january,08 sales  invoice from the legacy system to SAP system through BDC program.
    for this at the time of PGI we are using Actual GI date as month of January, 08 and keeping planned GI date as the system date and at the time of creating sales order, delivery, we are not changing the material available date, loading date, delivery date, at the item level and system taking automatically based on the current date
    when doing PGI system accepting and creating PGI document and billing also creating based on this delivery.
    But dose it give problem in Inventory managements and FI in future, then what would be the right procedure to uploading the back dated invoices in the system.
    Please give me solution for this issue, or what we are doing is the right procedure.
    Thanks In advance

    For those who might come across this note, the design issue was solved by incorporating Rule Groups.
    Problem:
    Need to have 2 different Date references for 0calday, based on the key figures. For example for Sales key figure date it would reference to Actual GI Date. But, for Intake key figure I needed the date reference to be Planned GI date.
    Solution-- applied to the transfer rules of the desired cube:
    1. In the starndard rule group delete the transfer rule for the appropriate key figures. in this case (sales key figure)
    2. In the same rule group map all time characteristics from the cube to Planned GI date from DSO
    3. Create a new rule group in the transfer rule between the DSO and the Info Cube
    4. In the new rule group, create a new rule for the appropriate key figure i.e. sales
    5. In the new rule group, Map the date/week/month/fiscal period to Actual GI date
    6. save/activate
    This solution eliminates the need for changing the data model, which makes everything almost transparent to the report users.
    Hope this helps someone.
    Edited by: Babak Shafiei on Dec 12, 2008 5:23 PM
    Edited by: Babak Shafiei on Dec 12, 2008 5:24 PM

  • LR dt to be taken as BiIlling dt instead of Actual Goods issue dt

    Hi
    The normal Business practice is the system takes the actual goods issue date mentioned in the delivery document as the billing date and accordingly ,the payment terms or credit days given to the  customer starts from this date.
    Now the requirement is
    The payment terms has to be with ref to LR (lorry receipt ) date and not on Actual goods issue date, for example: If the Actual goods issue date is 15th April & the LR date is 17th april  then the customers credit days has to start from 17th and not from 15th april .
    Because ,in real time we do not know when the transporter will pick and deliver the goods to the customer,so if the transit time is  2 days ,then customer would be loosing the ,2 credit days and the invoice would be due on the 7th day ,where as the customer would have received the stock 5 days back  and not 7days back.(if the  terms of payment is say 7 days)
    can any one suggest how to addresse this scenario apart from the  following
    1) Define  the terms of payment as longer by 2days
    2) Give the actual goods issue date as 2days in advance
    shashi

    Hi TricaC,
    I'm sorry to see your friend is having problems with his BT Broadband.  Please use the 'contact the mods' link in my forum profile to send in his details and we'll be happy to help. You can find the link by clicking on my username.
    Thanks
    Neil
    BTCare Community Mod
    If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
    We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Calculation of goods issue date in scheduling agreements with routes

    Hello together,
    i have a problem with the calculation of goods issue date in scheduling agreements when we use route, because the system ignore the days of transit.
    Example:
    We had customized the route 4711 with a transit time of 3 days. This route would be related to a scheduling agreement. But this setting has no influence to the calculation of the goods issue date for the schedules. The same happens with loading date and so on.
    Can anyone give me a tip, which setting is additional necessary?
    Regards
    Andreas Walter

    Hi,
    check the following settings
    1, Route determination Path : IMG>sales and distribution>Basic function>Routes>Route determination
    2, Activate the route Determination for your sales document type in following path :IMG>sales and distribution>Basic function>Routes>Route Schedule Determination-->Schedule with route schedule for sales document type
    3, Maintain Delivery scheduling and transportation scheduling in the following path:IMG>sales and distribution>Basic function>Delivery scheduling and transportation scheduling>Maintain Duration
    Regards
    Senya

  • Billing date(fkdat) in sales order item is not copied from Goods Issue Date

    Hi All
    we are facing problem at item level billing date field.This field should be filled with the GI Date in schedule lines shipping tab.
    but, it(billing date) is not being filled with goods issue date but, with the required deliver date at sales order header.
    Please give me a solution and the root cause. This is urgent as business is halted.
    Thanks
    Kumar

    Lakshmipati
    This is from SAP Screen
    "If invoice dates are defined for the customer, the system proposes the billing date from the invoice date calendar. If no invoice dates are agreed, then the actual goods issue date is formed on the basis of delivery related billing. In order related billing, the billing date of the order forms the basis of the billing date."
    earlier it is happening as desired.i.e., billing date=GI Date.
    but, as of now it is taken from the required delivery date.
    Please give me solution
    Kumar

  • POD confirmation date allow to give before goods issue date.

    Hello ,
    Would like to know that POD confirmation date process , system allows to input the pod date before the actual goods issue date in VLPOD screen as logically it should be wrong i guess as per my knowledge .i.e as soon as goods receipt by customer then only he will confirm pod , how system can allow before the actual goods issue date in VLPOD.
    for eg:
    1.sales order
    2.delivery
    3.goods issue with 23.12.2013
    4.pod date can enter with 01.12.2013 and save it.
    5.billing document
    Please advisse your thoughts/suggestions.
    Regards
    venkat

    hi venkat
    system will take back also , there is no config control ,you have to user user exit and control it
    include:   MV50AFZ1
    user exit:  USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE.
    IF likp-vkorg EQ '1000'.    "
        READ TABLE XLIKP INDEX 1.
         IF XLIKP-PODAT IS NOT INITIAL AND  XLIKP-WADAT_IST grater then or eq to XLIKP-PODAT
          MESSAGE e001(Z1) with xlips-VBELN.  "MESSAGE DOCUMENT DATE IS BACK DATE ( CHECK YOUR ENTRY)
         ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    check the ABAPER discuss with above logic
    regards
    sankar

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to move a large iphoto library from one external drive to another

    Hi all (my first ever post to a forum!) I have a large iphoto library (379 GB) on an external drive (Lacie 1TB w/usb 2.0) and want to move it to a another ethernet connected external drive (LaCie Network Space 2) so I will be able to access it from o

  • Error when cloning a AD connector (cannot insert NULL into ("OIMUSER"."OIU"

    I am getting below error when trying to clone AD connector (new resource). I Imported/Exported AD resource Object, Process form and the dependent lookup tables. I can see the new resource object, process definition, process forms and Recon rule, when

  • Legacy-XI-R/3

    How do we achieve the scenario Legacy System (Oracle)-XI-R/3 ... Is there any Web Blog which discusses this scenario.....How many interface we'll be using for this scenario....Thank you...

  • XI 2.0 Where do you turn tracing up ?

    How do I turn Tracing up to get the max information in the TraceDocument found within the sxmb_moni transaction "monitoring for Processing XML Messages"?

  • Photo booth and garageband

    Ever since i updated to os x mountain lion, photo booth isnt as sharpe as it was iam now delayed  a few seconds on it and now when recording on garageband when laying down a drum beat iam unable now to change the tempo. is there anything that i can d