Several key figures in one colume in P&L report

Hello!
Please, say me about decision of my problem:
I hame hierarchy 0GL_ACCOUNT in P&L report, key figure is 0Balance.
Items of P&L connected with one or more accounts.
But for several accounts I need new key figure (not 0Balance), which calculated with 0Balance from other account.
For example, I need GP = Gross Profit/ NetSales * 100% (May be onother formulas)
Gross Profit1   0Balance
   account11      100
   account21        70
Net Sales2
   account31        50
   account41        30
GP1 .......            ?
Gross Profit3   0Balance
   account51      100
   account61        70
Net Sales4
   account71        50
   account81        30
GP2 .......            ?

You can achieve this if you have two structures in place and not the hierarchy. If you use structues you can go ahead with cell definitions.

Similar Messages

Add update rule for new key figure in one info struc

Hi, everyone
I would like to know how to add update rule for new key figure in one info struc.
Thanks ahead.
Eric

1)I have created the update rule for one info structure
2)add one key figure in the info structure due to business requirement
3)then I use MC25 to add update rule for the new key figure, but I find that there no relevant menu to do such operation.
Can anybody tell me how to do with it?
Any answer will be appriciated.

250 Key figures in one cube?

Hello,
we need to report on 250 key figures at the same time. I now there is a limitation in the cube of 233 KF, any ideas to solve this problem? What about using an ODS for the reporting, are there any performance issues or do you have experiences with this amount of KF in one infoprovider?
Many thx
René

I think you should reaccess your data model and see if the no of key figures can be reduced. 233 is the max allowed by SAP. You can partyly solve this problem by creating 2 cubes with the same characteristics and splitting the key figures. This solution will work only when you have mutually exclusive key figures requirement in the report.
Also you can use the Restricted key figures and calculated key figures in the reports thereby reducin the actual key figures in the cube to be within the limit.
Hope this helps.
Amit

Subject : Problem with Virtual key figures for one scenario.

Hi Gurus,
I have implemented Virtual Keyfigures for my Bex report and it is working perfectly bUt for one scenario.
If i give PLANT and MATERIALS in the selection , The report calaculates the Virtual
keyfigure value correctly But if i give Only PLANT
and NO Materials ( A single plant can have 700 materials also!!), The report executes and after sometime
gives me a messsage " Disconnecting from Server"
I executed the report in RSRT . It gives me this error "exception with the type CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW occurred"
Since the Virtual keyfigure doesnot use Cache memory. Is it restricted by the Physical memory?. How to overcome this
problem?
Please let know if anyone faced this issue and resolved It. Any help or guidance is really appreciated.

Hi Oscar,
Thanks for reply,
How can i know the overflow and how can i use the catch for avoiding the short dump?
thanks in advance.

Adding key figures using commands in Web Application Designer?

Hello, all.
I have a query the contains several key figures. From that query, I created a query view in which only one of the key figures is displayed. I'm using this query view for one of the data providers in a web template. In Web Applicaiton Designer, I would like to be able to hide the key figure from the data provider and show a different one. How can I accomplish this using the built-in commands?
I know I can hide all key figures using the CLEAR_SELECTION_STATE command, but I can't figure out how to use a command such as SET_SELECTION_STATE_SIMPLE to show a different key figure. Any help would be great! Thanks.

I've tried that using the GUI to configure the command, but WAD crashes when I try to open the window where I choose the member name. The error says:
"4A6DM1A4LTXPJKA1BA3LD9TTD is not a valid characteristic for InfoProvider MQM_M01."
I also tried entering the commands as you suggested in the XHTML editor, but that resulted in an error when I tried to execute the command.
Maybe I can do what I'm trying to do using some method other than changing key figures. Basically all I want do is change the date range of the data shown using offsets.
The key figures that I'm trying to add and remove are restricted in Query Designer to different date ranges. These date ranges use offsets to set the restriction. For example, one key figure is restricted to display values for only the last 7 days and I'm trying to replace it with a key figure that's restricted to the last 14 days.
If I knew how to set a filter with offsets using commands in WAD, then I'd use that method, instead. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Cockpit report-mapping of key figures in WAD

Hi,
I'm working on a cockpit report wich consist of several different key figures combined together and shown for various months + some planning values. The key figures come from a multitude of infoproviders (and applications). So you would have a plan value, a value month -1, a value month -2 and a value current month on the X-axis and than the different kind of key figures (for instance: financial result, costs, number of employees, absence % etc.) on the Y-axis. Hereby the number of digits can differ per keyfigure, as well as the scaling factor, and some key figures require a %-sign.
On top of this there are several key figures that combine data from different providers (let's say: financial result divided by number of technical installations).
Now this can never be done in a query. Even the just the financial block would require key figures on both X- and Y-axis wich is not possible (and wouldn't make any sense in a logical way), not even mentioning the key figures that combine data from totally different applications. Now what I'm looking for is a way to map the query results to create the required report. If we'd only use the analyzer it wouldn't be a problem since I could put the queries on one tab and then use Excel functionality to map them to the fields and to be able to decide per cell how it should be formatted (with regard to number of digits for instance, wich can differ per cell). Since no navigation other than a selection on year/month is required this would do.
The only problem is that the client wishes to use web fucntionality. So now I'm looking for a way to do the same in the WAD. However I can't find a substitute in the WAD for the Excel functionality that is required to link query results to cells in the final report, nor to format each cell individually. My only solution (wich only solves the first problem) is one that constitutes of a large number of APD's that are used to get the query results into a DSO wich uses one key figure for al numerical info and some characteristics for the specification of the actual key figure that it represents.
First of all this solution is rather cumbersome and second, it doesn't solve my second problem (because the actual report consists of only one key figure for wich I can set the number of digits only for the entire column.
Big question is, is there anybody who has a more satisfying solution tho this problem. I'd think that there are a lot more companies that use reports that consist of key figures from different applications combined together in the way I described. However I could'nt find much on the inetrnet with concern to this matter.
By the way, I'm sorry for the poor lay out of this post, but no matter what I try, this forum ignores the use of the enter key and spaces.
Edited by: Jesse Brock on Sep 24, 2009 11:29 AM

Hi Priya,
Most likely, you have too many figures to display. You need to hide or add some drilldowns (or KFs in BEx) just to leave what you want to show in graph. Then select an area in Excel and use a standard Excel functionality to show graphs.
Best regards,
Eugene
Message was edited by: Eugene Khusainov

Hide Key figures in report but show result

Hi all,
I have a query with GL Account in the rows and Fiscal Period and the key figures in the colums, so the key figures are displayed per fiscal period. One of the key figures I want to be hidden for every individual period. However I do want to display the result for that key figure over the different periods.
Any suggestions on how to do that?
thanks,
Bart

hi,
In the rows I have characteristic GL account and in the colums I have characteristic fiscal year/period and 3 key figures: a formula called 'mutations' and 2 hidden key figures called 'Total debit postings' and 'Total credit postings'. 'Mutations' is 'Total debit postings' -'Total credit postings'. Because Fiscal year/period is in the colums the mutations are displayed per period. What I want to be able to see is both the sum of the mutations over all periods and the average of the mutations over all periods.
best regards,
bart

SAP Note 0407563: Key Figure Model versus Account Model in BW

I am reviewing a document on Key Figure Model versus Account Model in BW.
There are a number of references to "SAP Note 0407563", can anyone with access to this note post it here for me to review. Sometimes some otf there links prompt for password.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
<b>SAP Note 0407563</b>
Symptom
You would like to design a data model for SEM-BPS and you are not sure, whether to use the key figure or the account model.
You are looking for proposals for data modelling.
Additional key words
bps0, key figure, characteristic, model, data modelling, consultation
Cause and prerequisites
In the following you find a simple example by means of which the terms key figure and account model are defined.
In the example we want to assign several key figures (for example revenues) to a characteristic (for example customer), whose units (for example currency DM) are identical.A modeling option, which is called key figure model, contains all key figures in one data record.
Customer Revenue_1 Revenue_2 Revenue_3
A 10 DM 30 DM 50 DM
In the account model, on the other hand, an additional characteristic is added, which separates the revenue types.
Customer Type Revenue
A 1 10 DM
A 2 30 DM
A 3 50 DM
Advantages and disadvantages from the point of view of data modelling
You can easily add an additional revenue type in the account model, because you do not have to change the data structure.In the key figure model, on the other hand, you must add an additional key figure to the structure.It actually depends on the frequency of these changes occurring.
A data record that is to be changed by a processor, is exclusively locked by SEM-BPS for this processor.A lock that only concerns individual key figures of a data record is not possible.As a consequence the different revenue types can be changed simultaneously by different processors in the account model, wheras in the key figure model one processor automatically locks all key figures exclusively for his own use.
If you use a planning function in the account or key figure model, a different Customizing is required in general. Consequently, a conversion of the data model leads to a change of Customizing in general.
Advantages and disadvantages from the technical point of view
The transaction data is stored in the BW.Analyses have shown that the read time basically depends on the number and not on the size of the data records.In the above example you can see that by changing the key figure and account model the number of records increases by factor 3, which means that you must expect longer read times.When determining the factor you must take into account that normally not all key figures are used in every record in the key figure model.As a consequence only those records are created when changing to the account model, for which the key figures are not equal to zero.
Example:
So if in the above example the key figure Revenue_1 is not used, only two records are generated and consequently the value of the factor is also reduced to 2.
After the transaction data has been read from the BW, it is stored in the application server's memory.The amount of memory required depends, among other things, on the number and on the length of the records.The length can be influenced by the data model you choose:in the key figure model the records are longer than in the account model and therefore consume more memory for each record. Therefore, the key figure or account model will require less memory depending on the relationship between record length and number of records.
When the data model is changed, also the planning functions must be revised.Depending on the type of calculation there might be advantages for one of the models.
Example and rules of thumb
The following example contains 30 key figures, which were mapped to 3 key figures and one additional characteristic with a maximum of 10 characteristic values when you changed to the account model.In both models a price calculation between three key figures each was executed.Consider the specifications in the table as relative specifications:For the number of data records you for example find a and a*10.This means that in the second case the number of data records is larger by factor 10 than in the first case.The determination of the relationships is based on 5000 data records in the key figure model.
Example: all key figures are used (100%)
measured size      :     Key figure model, Account model
Number data records:      a      ,     a*10
Read time       :     l      ,     l*10
Price calculation:      t      ,     t*9
Data record length:      d*4      ,     d
Memory requirement :     m      ,     m*3
Example: Key figures are partially used (20%)
measured size      :     Key figure model ,Account model
Number data records :          a      ,     a*2
Read time           :     l      ,     l*2
Price calculation      :     t      ,     t*2
Data record length      :     d*4      ,     d
Memory requirement      :     m      ,     m*0,8
How are the sizes determined?
Read the related notes for details on the use of the statistics.
1. a: In the statistics of SEM-BPS or BW this value is stored when you execute a planning function. The method has the name 0-DB1.
2. l: The above statistical record also contains the execution time.
3. t: In the statistics of SEM-BPS a record is stored for the planning function.The overall runtime of the planning function contains the database time. Therefore the database time must be subtracted from the runtime of the planning function to determine t.
4. d: The data record length corresponds to the data structure length (ABAP length), which is generated for every area.The name is made up as follows:
Prefix: /1SEM/_YS_DATA_
Client: mmm
Name of the area: gggggggg
The client must always be specified with three digits, the area only in its actual length.The name for an area called 'MYAREA' which is in client 001 is for example /1SEM/_YS_DATA_001MYAREA.When you determine the length, note that there is the dictionary and the ABAP length (Transaction SE11 => Extras => Structure width => ABAP length) and that the total of the two structures contained must be determined.In the structure stated above, for example /1SEM/_YS_CHAS_001MYAREA and /1SEM/_YS_KYFS_001MYAREA are contained.The total is the length you are looking for.
5. m: After executing the planning function, start Transaction STAD and find the appropriate statistical record for the dialog step, in which you have executed the planning function.The record contains a memory specification, which is the desired value for s.
Solution
Bear in mind that the values from the example are not generally valid, but were determined from a specific example.We recommend that you determine the parameters (both the values of the variables and of the relationships) for your specific case and to use it as the basis for discussion.You should not choose too few data records, because the fixed memory consumers predominate otherwise.
Regards-
Siddhu
Message was edited by: sidhartha

Bex report does not display key figures

Friends,
Need help urgently.
We have a report of a multicube(MC1). key figures of one of the infocube(IC1) in the multicube(MC1) does not showup on the report.
If reported independly on that IC1 it does show all values. This sounds really weird but its taking up all my time.
Please friends, need your inputs on what else could have gone wrong.
FYI...earlier we had same problem but creating new report on this multicube resolved problem. But this time, we have a new KF added to the infocube(IC1). But no change to the reports are made. Even though problem occurs. I even transported all the rules, multicube and infocube.
Please help me identify what could be the cause for it.
-Raj

Gupta,
Thanks, this resolved my problem.
But here;s another issue that came up now.
I have a keyfigure (conversion factoor to EA) as attribute to master data infoobject (zmatnr). I have this included in the multicube. On the query, I have created a replacement path variable for conv. factor and this works well with all reports except this sales report which has key figures included from multicube(from multiple infocubes in muticube. Any idea what is that i am doing wrong?
thanks

Query problem with accumulated key figures

Hi BI Gurus!
I have a report problem that I hope you can help me with!
In my report I have 2 key figures. One for accumulated revenue previous year (KF1) and one for accumulated revenue current year (KF2). Both key figures should be presented in a graph in monthly buckets.
January figures from both the key figures shoule be presented in the same bucket. Therfore I can't use 0CALYEAR since we have the "year" information in there. Instead I'm using 0CALMONTH2 which is only two digits, 01 for January. That way I can map figures from both previous year and current year in the same bucket.
I need the figures to be accumulated and this is what I have problem with. When I run the report today in February 2010 it looks like this:
Month   KF1   KF2
01        10     15
02        10     20
03        15
04        10
05        20
06        10
07        10
08        15
09        15
10        20
11        20
12        10
This is how I would like the report to look like:
Month   KF1   KF2
01        10     15
02        20     35
03        35
04        45
05        65
06        75
07        85
08        100
09        115
10        135
11        155
12        165
I have tried to use the setting "accumulated" for the key figures but then I get this result:
Month   KF1   KF2
01        10     15
02        20     35
03        35     35
04        45     35
05        65     35
06        75     35
07        85     35
08        100   35
09        115   35
10        135   35
11        155   35
12        165   35
Since the KF2 is revenue for current year and I run the report in February I don't want any figures to be displayed in Mars...
I have tried to restrict the key figures by 0CALMONTH2 and 0CALYEAR. The KF1 is havein a restriction to only show values for 0CALYEAR - 1 and an interval for 0CALMONTH2 from JAN - DEC.
The KF2 is having a restriction to only show values in the interval "first month in year - current month" (in this example JAN - FEB) for 0CALMONTH2. And current year for 0CALYEAR.
Despite my restrictions for KF2 the numpers repeats itself for every month...
Any suggestion how I can resolve this?
Best regards
Anders Florin

Hi Khaled and thank you for trying to help me!
I agree with you and think the users should accept the report as it is. But they are claiming that top management will not accept this and they would really want this to be fixed the whay that they want. I have tried to push back on this and said that I'm not sure that it can be resoleved and that it could cost them a lot of money if I try.
But I will try to resolve it for them if I have spare time in the end of the project. I have not promised them anything but it would really be nice if I could fix it.
So when you say I need to use a structure and a calculated key figure. How should the calculated key figure and the structure be configured?
If I use a structure in the rows I guess I can't use same object in calc.key.figure right? Like if I use 0CALMONTH2 in the structure I'm not able to restrict the key figure with the same object? If that is correct I also have a ZMONTH object, different story why I have that... , that I can use in the same way as 0CALMONTH2. Or is this only a problem when I use "local" formulas within the query and not using a "global" calculated key figure? Cause I have only used the "loacal" formula calculated key figure in this report....
Br
Anders

Calculated Key Figures question

Hi
In a Purchase Order report I have included a Calculated Key Figures and this report is transported to the QA environment.
Then I create another report using the same Calculated Key Figures but when I tried to save the query it gives me an error;
"The query could not be saved due to a problem in transport"
"BEx transport request 'BD1K900664' is not suitable or not available".
I was told that when the 1st report uses that Calculated Key Figures and the report transported over to the QA I cannot reuse the same Calculated Key Figures in the new report. Is this true in SAP BI? If so how can I reuse the same Calculated Key Figures in a new report.

Hello Lai,
Once you have transported the earlier report along with the original calculated key figure, create one more request by selecting just the cal. key figure which you want to use.
dont release this request.
Now any change you make in the cal. key figure will be stored in this newly created request.
also go ahead and create a new query using this ckf and save it in the newly created request.
Then you can always release this and transport the same.
hope this helps..
let me know for any further issues...
thanks,

SAP BW Key figures displayed 100 times larger than it should

Dear all,
I'm using Crystal Reports 2008 SP2 und SAP Intetegration Kit X3.1 SP2 to create a report upon a BW Query (7.01). Several key figures are displayed exactly 100 times larger than it should. Only the formatted value is displayed correctly.
Is anyone familiar to this phenomenon?
best regards,
madadm

Solved:
the regional settings of the client machine have to match the servers' .This have been hard times...

Expand clustered Key Figures in filter panel (based on BW queries)

Dear colleagues,
in my BW query, I have created several key figures and have clustered them below Error Categorization 1 and 2.
In my Design Studio application I use a filter panel to select the key figures. The goal is to show the first level (error cateogization 1 and 2) at a first view with the option to expand these so that the detailed categories can be shown and selected.
Currently only the subcategories are shown in the filter panel in Design Studio.
Could you help here?
Thanks,
Katharina

Go to transaction RSRT, select your query, click on the properties tab and tick the selection box "Use Selection of Structure Elements". This is recommended practice where there are lots of key figures.

Change in Key figures for COPA report

Hi
We have changed some formula using T.code KER1 for a element of Key figure scheme which is used in COPA report.
How do we find out which all COPA reports will get impacted by this change.
Regards,
Rams

that key figure mapping helps you to map the value fields to the std fields (the ones that are included in the std COPA content cubes.) So that you dont end up creating ur own Zfields in BI to correspond to the value fields. If you have a functional guy how can do the mapping or help u do it - go for it .... orelse you can always create ur own Z objects, so that you dont have to go back to source system to figure which IO refers to which value field.

In key figures

Hi all,
In reporting i want to have options to display Indian currency and (optional) dollar in the same report.both the currencies are in seperate key figures.
Regards,
P.Manivannan

If you have them in diff key figures, then just drag them to the report.
Make sure, these key figures in Indian Rupees and the one in USD arealready converted with the exchage rates.
Ravi Thothadri

Several key figures in one colume in P&L report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for