Shared Server Process

I have one query regarding Shared Server Process.
1)Why SHUTDOWN needs dedicated server process and not shared server process?
Thanks in advance

>
1)Why SHUTDOWN needs dedicated server process and not shared server process?
>
Because Oracle maintains the connection for the user performing the shutdown until the shutdown is complete and their is still more work to be performed after the shared server processes are shutdown.
If you look at the shutdown part of the alert log when a shutdown is performed you will see that the dispatchers and shareds servers are shutdown before the database is closed and dismounted. There would be no more connection if a shared server were being used.
Consider the example shutdown log from this article
http://oracleappstechnology.blogspot.com/2007/08/oracle-11g-db-startup-and-shutdown.html
Find the portion that shows these steps
>
All dispatchers and shared servers shutdown
ALTER DATABASE CLOSE NORMAL
Wed Aug 15 18:24:35 2007
SMON: disabling tx recovery
SMON: disabling cache recovery
Wed Aug 15 18:24:35 2007
Shutting down archive processes
>
See how the CLOSE is issued AFTER the dispatchers and shared servers are shutdown?
See how the SMON service is still running?
If you then look at the very end you will see this
>
Stopping background process VKTM:
>
That last background process is described in chapter 9 (Process Architecture) in the Database Concepts doc
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/process.htm
>
•VKTM (virtual keeper of time) is responsible for providing a wall-clock time (updated every second) and reference-time counter (updated every 20 ms and available only when running at elevated priority).
>
Grandfather time is the last process to be stopped.
When your time comes to an end - you too will be 'shutdown' (chances of a successful recovery are not good even with extensive logs).
Here's hoping that your personal shutdown is 'normal' and not 'immediate' or 'abort'!

Similar Messages

  • Dedicated Server Process or Shared Server Process

    Hi,
    I am little confused to justify the number of users that may be best to use dedicated server process or shared server process.
    Kindly advice.

    In addition, make sure you account for administrative issues. It's a lot more challenging to trace applications using shared server connections. Shared server configurations also tend to introduce a variety of gotchas into a DBA's world-- at a minimum, most articles you find on the internet tend to ignore any shared server specific issues. That's one of the reasons that I tend to be of the opinion that if you have to ask, you probably don't need to enable shared server.
    Justin

  • Reg : Shared server process or dedicated server process

    Hi,
    Apologies if i have asked a silly question.How do we know whether our DB is running in dedicated server process or shared server process.

    Hi,
    How do we know whether our DB is running in dedicated server process or shared server process.
    I assume that, you are asking about the view of Oracle Processes in different OS Platform.
    In a UNIX environment, Oracle processes (also other DB Processes) can be viewed as individual system processes.
    On Windows platform Oracle Processes  (also other DB Processes) are implemented as threads that run within one common Oracle operating system process, oracle.exe (e.g. in DB2, db2syscs.exe process). These processes are not visible when you list processes at operating system level.
    Regards,
    Bhavik G. Shroff

  • How to find if a SAP Application uses Shared server process ??

    Hi,
    Please find the details below wrt to SAP application:
    SAP Release : SAP ECC 6.0
    Oracle database Version : 10.2.0.4.0
    Can you please tell me how to find if my SAP application  with oracle  uses Shared server mode or Dedicated server mode for oracle database access??
    regards,
    Arul S

    Hi Nick,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I am also pasting the output of "lsnrctl services"
    LSNRCTL for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    Copyright (c) 1991, 2007, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
    Connecting to (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=IPC)(KEY=R1Q.WORLD))
    Services Summary...
    Service "R1Q" has 1 instance(s).
      Instance "R1Q", status UNKNOWN, has 2 handler(s) for this service...
        Handler(s):
          "DEDICATED" established:0 refused:0
             LOCAL SERVER
          "DEDICATED" established:269921 refused:0
             LOCAL SERVER
    The command completed successfully
    This looks like dedicated connection with the Oracle database..
    Can you please comment on this?
    Regards,
    Arul S

  • When we go for shared Server environment?

    When we go for shared Server environment from Dedicated server mode?
    When we have to choose thi shared Server mode?
    Which is the optimized way?

    > When we go for shared Server environment from Dedicated server mode?
    You do not. It is not one or the other - it is using both correctly. You want shared server sessions to service applications (any, from web/app servers to flat clients) that are OLTP in nature. They fire off short-and-sweet SQLs that takes a second or three to execute.
    A shared server pool of a few processes can service a very large number of clients.
    You want to use dedicated servers to service OLAP type clients. They fire off complex SQLs that can tie up the server processes for several minutes at a time.
    And that in a nutshell is how to apply the two. It is not Shared Servers versus Dedicated Server. It is about using The Right Tool For The Job. Nothing more and nothing less.
    As for Windows, I will not really bother quickly with shared server connections. On Windows both shared and dedicated servers runs as threads in the main Oracle executable process image.
    There is thus very little resource saving by reducing the number of threads as the footprint of a thread is tiny in comparison to a brand new process. The amount of resources saved by a reducing the number of dedicated server threads is not significant. If anything, Oracle on Windows has shown to scale better than Oracle on Linux in this regard. (refer to [url http://www.perftuning.com/pdf/Comparison_Oracle_Windows_Linux.pdf]A Comparison of Oracle Database 10gR2 Real Application Cluster Performance on Microsoft Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition x64 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux x86_64 from the Performance Tuning Corporation).
    And this is exactly the opposite of how Oracle behaves on Unix. Each server process is a physical kernel process. This means that a servicing a 1000 concurrent sessions with a 1000 dedicated server processes, each consuming memory and resources, are expensive. Conversely, supporting a 1000 concurrent sessions with a 100 shared server processes is (almost) 90% cheaper.
    This makes Shared Server a desirable option to use to scale OLTP sessions on Unix-based systems (or any platform where Oracle does not use multi-threading but multi-processing).
    PS. As the Linux kernel support Posix threads (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_POSIX_Thread_Library), it begs the question as to when Oracle is going to support multi-threading on Linux instead of multi-processing.. or at least give us the option to choose.

  • Shared server config issues

    Dear experts,
    Below is my environment details:
    DB: Oracle 10gR1 Base (10.2.0.1)
    OS: RHEL 5
    I have configured shared servers as shown below:
    1) Set the following parameters
    dispatchers='(protocol=tcp)(dispatchers=2)'
    max_dispatchers=10
    shared_servers=4
    max_shared_servers=10
    circuits (not configured)
    2) Changed TNS parameter as below
    I modified SERVER=DEDICATED to SERVER=SHARED
    3) lsnrctl services
    the output of this command shows dispatchers ready
    Now coming to the issue, when i connect to the database using new tns alias, i see "NONE" displayed under "SERVER" column of the V$SESSION view. It should have been SHARED.
    Appreciate your help in this regard.
    Thanks
    P

    In Shared Server configuration when we see value 'NONE' , it means there is no task being processed by shared server for that session. The server column will infact show status of 'SHARED' if there is some task being processed at that particular time by the shared server process for that session. Hence to check the status, fire some big query and then check the server status .
    you can check the shared server as
    select server from v$session where machine='XXXX' ;--neeraj                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

  • APEX error: Found dead shared server

    Hi,
    I frequently encounter an error when working with APEX. If I submit any change to APEX, fi a change on some page item, APEX asks me to whether I'd like to save the wwv_flow_accept URL. I then get a file save dialog. This doesn't happen all the time, but something like 2 out of 10 times I submit something.
    Looking at the database logs, I see an entry in alert.log with this information:
    <pre>
    Fri May 22 17:56:36 2009
    Errors in file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_s004_1948.trc:
    ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [_npierr+487] [PC:0x5F22C3] [ADDR:0x4] [UNABLE_TO_READ] []
    Fri May 22 17:56:40 2009
    found dead shared server 'S004', pid = (18, 1)
    </pre>
    Looking into the respective trace file gives me this information:
    <pre>
    Dump file c:\oraclexe\app\oracle\admin\xe\bdump\xe_s004_1948.trc
    Fri May 22 17:56:36 2009
    ORACLE V10.2.0.1.0 - Production vsnsta=0
    vsnsql=14 vsnxtr=3
    Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    Windows XP Version V5.1 Service Pack 3
    CPU : 1 - type 586, 1 Physical Cores
    Process Affinity : 0x00000000
    Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:727M/1511M, Ph+PgF:1181M/2133M, VA:1428M/2047M
    Instance name: xe
    Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
    Oracle process number: 18
    Windows thread id: 1948, image: ORACLE.EXE (S004)
    *** ACTION NAME:(PAGE 4311) 2009-05-22 17:56:36.625
    *** MODULE NAME:(APEX:APPLICATION 4000) 2009-05-22 17:56:36.625
    *** CLIENT ID:(CKH_DEV:2151496271973569) 2009-05-22 17:56:36.625
    *** SESSION ID:(29.4) 2009-05-22 17:56:36.625
    *** 2009-05-22 17:56:36.625
    ksedmp: internal or fatal error
    ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [_npierr+487] [PC:0x5F22C3] [ADDR:0x4] [UNABLE_TO_READ] []
    Current SQL statement for this session:
    COMMIT
    ----- PL/SQL Call Stack -----
    object line object
    handle number name
    267D174C 1275 package body APEX_030200.WWV_FLOW
    267D174C 5421 package body APEX_030200.WWV_FLOW
    267D174C 13366 package body APEX_030200.WWV_FLOW
    26521088 30 anonymous block
    ----- Call Stack Trace -----
    memory dump follows
    </pre>
    Has anybody an idea what is going wrong on my machine here?
    Best regards,
    Jürgen

    Hi,
    I took a bit of time to dig deeper into this issue. I came to the conclusion that there is a bug in Oracle XE:
    If you connect to Oracle XE database using the EPG path and if you create a report that gets its data over a database link, the shared server processes used to connect to the database break.
    What I did to produce this error:
    I installed Oracle XE Universal Edition on a Windows XP system
    I then updated APEX to the latest version 3.2
    At the database I simply created a database link pointing to the same schema the APEX-application is running at. I tested the database link.
    I then produced a simple test application with just one Report (I also tried a PPR-report with the same result) that displays orders with a query in line with this:
    <pre>
    select o.order_id, i.order_item_id, i.quantity, p.product_name, i.unit_price, i.unit_price * i.quantity amount
    from demo_orders@ckh o, demo_order_items@ckh i, demo_product_info@ckh p
    where o.order_id = i.order_id
    and i.product_id = p.product_id
    order by o.order_id, i.order_item_id
    </pre>
    When I ran this application, I was sometimes able to see the report without an error, sometimes a shared server process broke. You can watch the processes breaking by opening the admin/bdump directory and see how the database writes trace files for the shared server processes.
    Interesting to see is that the error happens not only when you try to see the report. If you hit the edit page link while running the page or if you submit the page definition with the link query in it, the same is likely to happen. You can see this error happening when APEX offers you to download the call to wwv_flow or the f-procedure. The contents of this download then is:
    <pre>IBMPC/WIN_NT-8.1.0</pre>
    with some binary information in front of the message.
    Another bug I'd like to add came up when I was lucky to see the report with the PPR-template. I tried pagination but this wouldn't work. Looking into this, I found the following link:
    <pre>
    javascript:html_PPR_Report_Page(this,'R2060428410112776','javascript:$a_report('2060428410112776','16','15','15');')
    </pre>
    To my understanding this can't work at all if you look a the apostrophes. So how to proceed with this???
    This to me is a severe problem, as I wanted to utilize APEX as a frontend for a production database to report the contents. I was informed by Varad that a way around this is to use an Apache access to Oracle XE but as far as I'm informed, this forces me into a licenced version in order to be able to run mod_plsql.
    I read about the mod_owa-approach, but the programmers state that this is not compatible with APEX. So my question is: Do you have any suggestion on how to proceed with this?
    Thanks,
    Jürgen
    Edited by: j.sieben on May 27, 2009 5:41 PM

  • Change of Server process

    Dear all
    I am using oracle 10G R2 ...on windows
    I want to change dedicated server process to shared server process
    pls let me know the command and step by step procedure to change
    As soon as no of users increased then i have to restart the services so i thnk if i changed it to shared server i wont face any problem
    so pls let me know how could i change it..

    Refer to Oracle documentation for following parameters for better understanding of shared server mode.
    http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/toc.htm
    DISPATCHERS
    MAX_DISPATCHERS
    SHARED_SERVERS
    MAX_SHARED_SERVERS
    SHARED_SERVER_SESSIONS
    LARGE_POOL_SIZE
    You need to evaluate these parameters as per your environment and set them in init.ora of your database. Then restart the database after creating the SPFILE.
    Generally, as a rule, 1 dispatcher can serve 10 client connections without much problem unless they keep the dispatcher really busy.
    Also, the MAX parameters define the maximum number of threads per type. So they are set to a higher value.
    You can dynamically alter the DISPATCHERS and SHARED_SERVERS parameter using ALTER SYSTEM to suit your system needs at runtime.

  • Can someone decode this diagram of a shared server?

    Hi.
    This diagram
    http://esupport.csci.unt.edu/oracle/server.901/a90117/manproc.htm
    of the Oracle Shared Server setup is quite useful but I would like to ask anyone here to tell me what the numbers 1 and 7 , and 4 represent.
    Im thinking that between 1 and 7 we have the user process.
    And that for number 4 we have the server process.
    Cheers.
    DA

    I believe these number is used to demonstrate the sequence of shared server flow.
    1. User application called to dispatch process to request for connection
    2. Dispatch place user request to Request Queue
    3. User request is served by Shared Server Processes
    4. Making necessary interaction with SGA, buffer cache, shared pool etc
    5. After request processed, result place to Response Queue
    6. Result was routed to Dispatch process
    7. Served back to User Application

  • SAP db upgrade to Oracle 10G 64 bit - Dedicated or Shared Server ?

    We current run 32bit servers ( approx 150 users ) and plan to migrate to ECC 6.0 on 64bit bit server. Question about upgrade <br>from Oracle 9.2.0.8 32bit to 10.2.0.4 64 bit . Database upgrade Oracle 64 bit should be Dedicated or Shared Server? <br><br>
    My understanding ( limited), is Oracle 64bit dedicated server connection has the dedicated resource so whether or not a user is<br> doing work the connection remains allocated to that user. So for example, in our case a small Windows "shop" will needs <br>around 2MB of kernel space. So 150 threads, for 150 dedicated server connections, approx 150 x 2MB RAM.  Correct ? <br><br>
    Whereas Shared server the user connection is shared, that is user is connecting by dispatchers and when a user is idle his <br>resource can be used by other users, thus lessen the load on system. So in this case maybe 5 dispatcher processes and <br>30 shared server processes to service the 150 sessions of the 150 users which seems very effective to me . <br>My main concern however is with some of the Finance people who get problems with huge COPA and SIS reports now which is <br>why we are moving to 64bit OS/DB/SAP<br><br>
    Question is which does SAP ECC 6.0 support ( or recommend ) Oracle 64 bit Dedicated or Shared Server db migration ?

    > Question is which does SAP ECC 6.0 support ( or recommend ) Oracle 64 bit Dedicated or Shared Server db migration ?
    Never heard that anyone uses shared Server Setup with SAP.
    With SAP, it is NOT the user having a DB connection.
    It is the workprocess, and it is keeping it even if all users are idle.
    You allways have dedicated Oracle processes for SAP Workprocesses.
    The rather old note 70197 states, that Oracle MTS (multi threaded server)
    allowed, but you are on your own to configure it and there are some pitfalls.
    Volker

  • Oracle Shared Server Session Scheduling

    Hi,
    We're currently evaluating the shared server architecture for production use. As far as we know, Oracle schedules N sessions across M operating system threads, dependent on the configured limits.
    An essential requirement for our production system is to be able to associate a given operating system thread belonging to an Oracle shared server process with a session (more specifically the session owner) and maintain this information externally. Because a shared server thread may handle multiple sessions in random order with interruption, the assumption that a given thread and its corresponding thread identifier always processes a specific session throughout the thread lifetime is incorrect, thus we cannot directly associate a thread and session via the thread identifier.
    Does Oracle provide a way to be notified (native callback) before and/or after a shared server level scheduling "session context switch" so that a thread id could be used to associate a thread with a session at any given time?
    Thanks in advance for any insights!
    cheers,
    Horst Reiterer

    You can realize if your database is working in shared mode through several ways:
    1.- Looking the background process at the OS level
    2.- Looking some init parameters and other methods
    What is your OS ?
    Joel Pérez
    http://otn.oracle.com/experts

  • Found dead shared server

    every day i found this message in the db log :
    "Tue Mar 29 22:21:08 2005
    found dead shared server 'S000', pid = (10, 5)
    Wed Mar 30 13:51:58 2005
    found dead shared server 'S000', pid = (10, 6)"
    what do it means ??
    it is danger for the databse ???

    mrashid07 wrote:
    In /bdump oracle only provide this information---
    found dead shared server 'S000', pid = (17, 49)
    How can I find out these processes (17, 49) which made the dead lock event??? There's no evidence from this message that the process was terminated due to a dead lock event.
    Oracle also does not terminate a dead lock process - it raises a deadlock exception, allowing the process to catch this exception and re-act on it.
    When Oracle does terminate a process, it will be due to some kind of fatal error. In which case there will be an ORA-0600 or similar error message in the alert log, together with a trace file reference (or cdmp ref) that contains the technical details as to what happened.
    Dead shared servers are usually caused by an external process (or user) explicitly issuing a command to terminate the shared server process. E.g. killing the shared process at o/s level (using the o/s CLI), or via Oracle using the "+alter system kill session+" command.
    You have not shown any evidence yet to the contrary - so the only conclusion that can be made thus far is that Oracle is not an issue here, but application code and/or users are.

  • Shared server connections.

    we are running a third party application with an 11g database shared server configuration and OAS 10gR2. Dispatchers set to 10 and shared servers set to 100. When the database instance is started, the 100 shared server and 10 dispatcher sessions start up and I can see these processes with ps -ef. They show as ora_s0* processes and ora_d0* respectively.
    At some point after the startup of the application, it establishes a connection pool of 100 sessions (10 per dispacher). The process Id of these sessions correspond to the pids of the dispatcher processes not the shared server processes.
    The 100 sessions in the connection pool remain idle until a user logs on to the system. When a successful login is made, I see that about 8 of the idle sessions become active and remain so until the user finishes with the application and logs out.
    Questions :
    1. Is there a query I can do to show me the shared sherver sessions i.e. ora_s0* being used?
    3. Are the 100 sessions (in the connection pool) really the shared server sessions even though they show up with the pid of the parent dispatcher?
    2. I need to record the number of connections being made to the system over a period and how long each user is connected for, could you suggest the best method (including queries) of going about this task?
    Thank you.

    user8869798 wrote:
    we are running a third party application with an 11g database shared server configuration and OAS 10gR2. Dispatchers set to 10 and shared servers set to 100. When the database instance is started, the 100 shared server and 10 dispatcher sessions start up and I can see these processes with ps -ef. They show as ora_s0* processes and ora_d0* respectively.
    At some point after the startup of the application, it establishes a connection pool of 100 sessions (10 per dispacher). The process Id of these sessions correspond to the pids of the dispatcher processes not the shared server processes.
    The 100 sessions in the connection pool remain idle until a user logs on to the system. When a successful login is made, I see that about 8 of the idle sessions become active and remain so until the user finishes with the application and logs out.
    Questions :
    1. Is there a query I can do to show me the shared sherver sessions i.e. ora_s0* being used?You can use v$shared_server s, v$circuit c, v$session n
    with this as joining condition- s.circuit = c.circuit and c.saddr = n.saddr
    3. Are the 100 sessions (in the connection pool) really the shared server sessions even though they show up with the pid of the parent dispatcher? you can query server column of v$session to check if they are shared or dedicated.
    2. I need to record the number of connections being made to the system over a period and how long each user is connected for, could you suggest the best method (including queries) of going about this task?
    I see only ash the option for you, else you need to have your own scheduled script/procedure that would gather that information.
    Thank you.

  • Dedicated server process

    1)How can we limit the max number of dedicted server processes in a adatabase? or it will be a memory dependent?or any parameter to limit the dedicated server processes?
    2)when i connect through database:
    a) sqlplus "/as sysdba" or
    b)sqlplus
    connect sys/password
    in the above two a and b cases, the user connects to the database through dedicted server process...right? so i want to over write this default connection means in above two cases i need to connect to the database through shared server process. how its possible...can any one explain?
    3)In dedicated connection the resources are fully utilized and in shared server connection the resources are splitted to various users because shared server connection supports multiple user environment. How the resources fully utilzed in dedicated connection and splitted to various users in shared server connection?
    Can any one explain this?

    1)How can we limit the max number of dedicted server processes in a adatabase? or it will be a memory dependent?or any parameter to limit the dedicated server processes?You cannot limit the number of dedicated connections. There is no such parameter. The only restriction that you can impose here is via the PROCESSES parameter.
    Doing so, will restrict the number of connections to a particular database (irrespective of dedicated or shared server connection).
    in the above two a and b cases, the user connects to the database through dedicted server process...right? so i want to over write this default connection means in above two cases i need to connect to the database through shared server process. how its possible...can any one explain?That's right and I don't think you can override this behaviour. You can get a shared server connection by using TNS alias when your database is running in shared server mode.
    3)In dedicated connection the resources are fully utilized and in shared server connection the resources are splitted to various users because shared server connection supports multiple user environment. How the resources fully utilzed in dedicated connection and splitted to various users in shared server connection?Well you need to understand the configuration difference in first place.
    Whenever a client connects to an Oracle database (via SQL * Plus, any application etc.), the client connection asks the database server to create a process on the server which will service the client's requests. Then this newly spawned server process would take all the requests from the client and process them and send the results of the same back to the client. This is “dedicated” server configuration.
    Each of these client connections takes up some resources (memory, CPU time, net-work bandwidth…) on the database server. More the number of client connections, more is the resource consumption, more is the delay is processing the requests.
    The clients can be working continuously or working at intervals. If the clients are working at intervals (e.g. inserting a record in approximately 10-12 minutes), then the “dedicated” server process spawned by this client connection is idle for more than 95% of the time and still consuming valuable resources on the database server.
    A database serving an application, where-in most of the server processes spawned by the client requests are idle for 90+% of the connect time, is a good candidate for Oracle Shared server mode configuration.
    Shared server is configuration method in which one server process can handle more than one client connections/processes/requests. As there are a few number of server processes created on server, the server resources are utilised to a minimum. This en-ables the database administrator to define more number of dispatcher processes to handle the requests from the clients and more number of shared server processes that handle and process the requests between these dispatchers and database kernel.
    Edit: "Hub" beat me while I was typing the whole story :-(
    Edited by: Satish Kandi on Nov 18, 2008 5:41 PM

  • Shared server trace file

    Hi All,
    Our production db is 10.2.0.3 with 2 nodes RAC in MS 2003 window servers. I am wondering what kind of information that Oracle capture in the shared server trace file (file name looks like instance_s001_3333.trc) . When I open some of these files I always see one query always there along with the messages like:
    WAIT #8: nam='gc cr block 2-way' ela= 1222 p1=65 p2=49677 p3=1 obj#=69689 tim=4137263779
    WAIT #8: nam='gc cr block 2-way' ela= 593 p1=65 p2=50863 p3=1 obj#=69689 tim=4137265531
    WAIT #8: nam='gc cr block 2-way' ela= 592 p1=65 p2=50879 p3=1 obj#=69689 tim=4137266700
    Should we need to tune this query to make it disappear in the shared server trace files? What are the conditions to trigger Oracle put this query into trace file?
    Thank you very much in advance for your support!
    Shirley

    These trace files are very likely generated by some trace statements originating from client programs connected to shared server processes such as client application processes, SQL*Plus, SQL Developer, OEM, TOAD, etc.
    Is your client application instrumented ?
    Do some people analyze performance problems on the database side ?
    The triggering statements may be some ALTER SESSION statements or package calls like DBMS_MONITOR in 10g or other
    (see examples in http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/04-jan/o14tech_perf.html).
    You should also check that instances are not configured with instance level tracing:
    show parameter sql_traceYou can also check current database sessions sql tracing status with:
    select sid, serial, program, sql_trace from v$session where username is not null;

Maybe you are looking for

  • IPad unresponsive after iOS 8.02 update, doesn't show up in iTunes, hardware reset (home and standby buttons both held down for ten seconds) not working

    I have a 32GB iPad mini that was purchased new in June of this year. A little while ago, I started the iOS 8.02 download while it was plugged into a wall socket using an official apple wall to USB plug and an official apple thunderbolt cable. I then

  • ENCODER 2.5 Issue on XP

    Using Live Media Encoder version 2.5 (also tried ver 3.0 with same result) running on XP via bootcamp on a Mac. On open looks good but as soon as I go and change ANY setting within it locks up/freezes the application and must close it down. Any one r

  • How to add a lookup to the customized jsp

    Hi, I added a menu item, when click on this menu item it goes to the one jsp page(my own jsp page), here I have one field, for this field I want to add a lookup..... please advice me how to achieve this..... Thanks.

  • EEO Category

    I am trying to update the EEO Categories that will be assigned to a job via infotype 1610 (US Job Attributes).  However, the new standards for the EEO category are as follows: 1.1 Executive/senior level officials and managers 1.2 Mid-level officials

  • Associate Button Clicked for a Value. Please help.

    How do I assoiate the 'Button Clicked' for a particular value.? I have a list displayed from a HashTable on a Layout The hashTable contains : ht.put("Monday Data ", new JButton("More Info")); ht.put("Tuesday Data ", new JButton("More Info")); ht.put(