Shipment Cost: Group Condition Type calculated on a special weight...

Here is the scenario: A shipment (truck) combines multiple deliveries, grouped on a stage when same destination (happens often).
A condition per LB is to be calculated on the cumulated weight per destination (per stage) BUT not simply on the gross weight, but on the heavier of 2 special weights: the business here uses a special formula according to the packaging, and it gives 2 weights (stored in Z fields of LIKP), an actual weight and a cubic weight.
The purpose is to identify for each delivery the heavier weight and to use cumulated the weight across the deliveries to the same destination to calculate the per CWT cost.
This is my first issue: the condition type is defined at Delivery calculation base, Calculation Type Multi-dimensional, and as a group condition). How do I define to use the cumulated of each delivery heavier weight ? In the Scale for condition type view, I used the scale basis D Gross Weight (which is not right..), there is also a field for a Scale Base Value formula, I wondered if that is what I should use..
My 2d issue: once the cost is calculated, I have to re-distribute it on the deliveries as per the proportion of their heavier weight compared to the total weight used for the calculation…Should that be an alternate Condition Base Value formula in the pricing procedure (where xkwert would be….the heavier weight….would that be then a new Z field to be filled in by the user exit determing the heavier value) ??
Thanks a lot, it is a tough one, I know...who is the best ever shipment cost pricing consultant ? !

Hi Guys
Unfortunately I do not think that you will get an answer now. Either your question is not simple or we do not know.
So in the interest of keeping the Forum tidy and easier to surf through could you please close your thread and either try one of the other forums or try another post. I do not think that most people will bother to look this far back anymore.
Sorry I cannot help as I would if I could.
Regards
Frenchy.

Similar Messages

  • PO condition type calculation formula.

    Dear there,
          Hallo, i going to develop a customize create Purchase order screen (same like ME21n), and i facing a problem in the condition type calculation part, because i dun know how to get the formula of each condition type calculation so i cannot calculate the price for the PO ,
         Is there any menthod we can get the formula for each condition type ? or any standard function we  can use to calculate the price instand of using coding to calculate it?
    THanks

    Hi,
    Hope this link will help you. Condition Type Formula--G

  • Condition Types : Calculation Type Change from A (percentage) to B (fixed )

    Dear All,
    We created a condition type (Calculation Type : A (percentage) ) and assigned access sequence and maintained in pricing procedure but later decided to change the calculation type to B (Fixed Amount) on this condition type.
    I am wondering, what impact it will have ?? Can I simple change the calculation type on this condition type or should I take care of any thing else ??
    Let me know, What things I have to take care of.  Thanking you.
    Anu.

    Hi Anu,
    No need of worry if it is independent condition type, means other conditions are not depending on it OR it is not depending on others.
    Also check the condition records if they have any impact.
    Else not a big issue, simply go ahead.

  • How to update cost related condition type amount in sales order without disturbing other condition types.

    Hi ,
    How to updae only one item condition  ZYV0 value in sales order. If I can see we have several options from pricing type to update condition types but here My requirement is to update only one condition amount .If I can see other pticing types they will update all condition types .
    -Exclusive option is checked for all the tables maintained in access sequence,
    Below options were not worked for me.
    -In condition type ----> Condition category has been updated with "D"(Tax) pricing type-"G" to update in sales order
    - This option worked for me but  condition category  "F"(frieght) and pricing type -H but in conditions tab when I update two condition amounts are activated for one condition type like below.
    ZYV0--30 % (old condition record value updated in sales order)
    ZYV0- 50% (updated condition record)
    Regards

    Hi Rita,
    Tried with condition category "u" and updated with pricing type "U" . It works as same I used old logic.
    with condition categories "D" and "F" it will update old and new condition record values in sales order.
    ZYV0--30 % (old condition record value updated in sales order)
    ZYV0- 50% (updated condition record)
    I have updated  here existing condition record value from 30 % to 50 % validity periods are not changed.
    Regards

  • Va01 condition type calculation

    1 want the net value to be the total of all condition tyoe amounts on the condition tab. at the moment it is only summing up the total of two condition types even if there are more than 2 condition types

    Hi,
    These settings are done in the Pricing procedure related to the sales order.
    GOTO --> Header --> Conditions --> Click on the Aalysis tab at the bottom.
    Get the pricing procdure from the next screen.
    Transaction --> VoK0 --> display the pricing procedure.
    click on the controls - you will find the list of condition types related to this  pricing procedure.
    Check the column for total which indicates which all condition types to be added.
    I think here you should  take help of Functional Consultant and get this resolved. Its all related to settings.
    Hope this helps..
    Regards,
    Shahu

  • Group Condition types & routines - pricing

    Do we have to code the group condtion routines all the time? If I just have the group condition box checked without any routine coded, I am seeing that SAP is grouping all the items in the sales order using the same access. Please let me know. Thanks.

    Hi,
    This depends on your requirement. If you have defined the condition at the material pricing group level, then no need. The routine is used only if you want the condition to be read differently for each item (with the scale base value being total of all the items).
    You can find some help in the below link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/de/7a8534c960a134e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
    There are some helpful SAP Notes if you need further clarifications:
    39034     Group condition routine
    854978     Function of cumulated scale base values (in SD)
    109708     Scale processing for group conditions
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Nikhilesh

  • Condition Type Of Shipment Cost

    Hi
    Guru:
    Anyone can tell me which transaction/table to include all the condition type of shipment cost ?Thanks.

    Hi ,
    The following is the path for defining the various parameters for Pricing Determination of Shipment costs.
    Logistics Execution >Transportation>Basic Transportation Functions -->Shipment Costs -->
    Pricing -->Pricing Control.
    For T.Codes:
    T_03                                      Cond.tab: Create (shipment costs)
    T_04                                      CondTab: Change (shipment costs)
    T_05                                      CondTab: Display (shipment costs)
    T_06                                      Cond.types: Pricing shipment
    T_07                                      Maintain access (shipment costs)
    T_08                                      Conditions: Proc. for A F
    T_09                                      Condition table: Change Index
    T_31                                      Maintain excl. group shipment
    T_32                                      Maintain CondTypes for ExclusionGrp
    T_53                                      Assign purchasing data
    T_54                                      Shipment cost relevance shipments
    T_56                                      Shipment cost types and item cats
    T_57                                      Shipment cost types and relevance
    T_60                                      Date determination: Define rules
    T_70                                      Maintain service agent group
    T_71                                      Maintain document procedure group
    T_72                                      Maintain shipping type group
    T_73                                      Maintain pricing procedure
    You maintain the values of the Shipment cost in TK11.
    Regards,
    Karthik.

  • Shipment cost transfer to condition types of PO

    HI! I saw this note 427944 which states the rules to transferring the shipment costs into the condition types of the PO:
    The shipment cost value (without tax amounts) is cumulated for all relevant shipment cost documents for each service agent and transferred to a corresponding condition type of the purchase order item. Before cumulation, the amounts are first converted into the purchase order currency.
    1. A transfer of the values for each condition type (similar to the transfer from a shipment cost document to the SD billing document) is not supported.
    2. If different service agents exist in the shipment cost documents, a corresponding number of condition lines (with value 0) must be specified in the purchase order item. These can always belong to the same condition type (in schema 'Manual') or also to different condition types (not 'Manual'):
    a) Manual condition lines: If the condition type in the schema of the purchase order is marked is 'manual', the condition type must be created (with value 0) in the purchase order item before the goods
    receipt. If delivery costs are expected from different service agents, several non-valuated entries must be generated for this condition type. If more condition lines exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines are missing, the last service agents are not settled.
    - Advantage: You only have to define one condition type for the delivery costs.
    - Disadvantage: Each purchase order must be processed manually before the goods receipt.
    b) Automatic condition lines: If the condition lines are to be generated automatically for the delivery costs (the condition type is not flagged as 'Manual' in the schema), the schema must have
    enough condition types to settle several service agents. If more condition lines exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines are missing, the last service
    agents are not settled.
    - Advantage: The goods receipt can be carried out without manual preparation beforehand in the purchase order.
    - Disadvantage: You must define identical condition types with different names.
    I can understand point a about the manual condition lines and have tried it out myself.
    But I don't quite understand point b about the automatic condition lines and so I need some clarification here.
    1. Does that mean I do not need to maintain the condition type in the PO?
    2. Does that mean the system will automatically find a condition to put the shipment cost for each service agent?
    3. How does the system know which condition to take then?
    4. I tested with the 'manual' field not flagged in the PO schema but no shipment cost is transferred. Is it because of the existence of other normal condition types that are also not manual?
    Appreciate any help to this.
    Thanks!
    SF

    No answer

  • Shipment cost & shipping type

    Hi all,
    i have some question about routes & stages.
    1) in one routes with two stages: these stages can be different for shipping type? (for instance: 1) by ship 2) by road
    2) when i calculate shipment cost: (a condition record with scales in function of tariff zone of departure and tariff zone of destination)----->
    why the costs are only calculated by the system for 2nd stage e not for 1st stage.????
    if i configure 1st stage (by road as the 2nd stage) the system calculates cost for 1some  st and 2nd stage... (and it's right)!!!
    Any solutions??
    best regards
    Alba

    Hi,
    Dear Imran,
    You have posted this question twice and there is no such condition
    You have to maintain scale and if need to develop routine and that I already suggested to you.
    Kindly do not post 1 question many time
    Kapil

  • Define upper/lower limits for shipment cost condition

    Hi people, help please!
    How can I define upper/lower limit for shipment cost conditions?.
    The transaction TK11 has the functionality for upper/lower limits, but I can't find how to define it in customizing.
    I follow the path Logistic Execution>Transportation>Pricing>Pricing Control>Define Condition Types, but is not like the transaction for pricing elements in condition types for sales.
    How can I do it?
    Regards.

    The problem is on the class condition import limits.
    I can’t customize upper and lower prices for the shipment cost class condition and i cant find how define it or what else can I do.
    The customizing transaction for shipment cost lass condition is not like sales price class condition, please look this:
    For the shipment cost class condition follow the path SPRO>Logistic Execution>Transportation>Shipment Cost>Pricing>Pricing Control>Define Condition Types.
    For the sales price class condition follow the path SPRO>Sales and Distribution>Basic Function>Pricing>Pricing Control>Define Condition Types, and take a look in Define upper/lower limits for conditions.
    So then, when I go to functional transaction VK11 for the sales price condition y can’t assign an import out of the limits defined. I need the same for shipment cost condition, transaction TK11, but I can’t find where define the limits, as result, user can load any import without limits.
    I hope the explanation is useful.

  • Error in pricing when trying to manually enter Shp. Cost  condition type

    Greetings everyone!
    I'm creating my own pricing procedure and I've added Shp. Cost (0HD0) condition type to it and when I'm trying to enter a price per KG it gives me an error:  "Material Test Product, condition 0HD0 : unit of measure KG is not allowed Invalid manual change to zero of condition pricing unit". Product's unit of measure and weight has been maintained though. It also happens if I use standard pricing procedure with that condition type in it... Why is that happening? Is there any workaround for that?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Alex.

    Hello Alex,
    Any solution to question yet? I am facing same issues and I am curious to the solution to this.
    Kind regards,
    Carla

  • Ranch Billing, the excise condition type JMOD calculation is wrong

    Hi
    I wish to know that in case of Branch Billing, the excise condition type calculation is wrong!!
    I am surprised and unable to know how it could be?
    In billing document display (T.code VF03) , Out of 3 Line items, Basic Excise Duty of 2 line items/ Materials were wrongly calculated.
    i.e. In Item level Condition Overview---> the excise condition type JMOD --> details -->
    Amount                   10.000  %
    Cond.base value            79,077.85  INR
    Condition value             5,733.14  INR
                                                                                    Alt.calc.type   355
    Ideally, It must be 7907.85 INR instead of 5733.14 INR wrong value.
    Please help me to know the possible reason.
    Thanking you.
    PP

    Check the condtion value in condition type UTXJ . If the JMOD value is 10% of UTXJ then assessable value should have been maintained for the Material and Plant combination in J1ID. This is due to Routine 351 maintined in pricing procedure for the condition type UTXJ
    check and confirm
    Senthils

  • Scale type D for group conditions

    Hi all,
    I am creating a new group condition and am trying to make it scale type D - graduated-to-interval scale. However because this is a group condition, SAP is giving me an error (Scale type 'D' cannot be used for group condition 'X').
    What is the best solution to this?
    I would like to give discounts based on:
    Sales quantity:
    1-100 = 15% off
    101-200 = 25%
    201-300 = 35%
    301-400 = 45%

    Hello
    This is b'coz your condition type with active Group condition Indicator. That means, here the system calculates the basis for the scale value from more than one item in the document.
    So, the scale D maintain in Scale basis for those condition type, does not go with it and throws an Error.
    Thus, if you want to scale functionality for condition type with group condition indicators use GrpCond.routine to maintain routine.
    Routine number for creating group key identifies a routine that calculates the basis for the scale value when a group condition occurs in pricing.
    For instance.
    Check routine 3-Mat.Pricing Group. This is an example of a structure of group key formula.  A structure of group key formula can be used to influence the basis the system uses when reading the scale of a group condition.  The formula is assigned to a group condition type in customizing.
    Formula '3' adds up the quantities / values of all of the line items in the sales document that have the same material pricing group (field KONDM) as the current sales document line item.
    A company defines a particular discount (condition type Z001) with scales based on weight.  When a sales order line item is priced that is eligible for the Z001 discount, the user would like the system to read the scale with not just the weight of the current line item, but the combined weight of all items in the sales document that have the same material pricing group as the current line item.  To accomplish this, the user defines condition type Z001 as a group condition and assigns structure of group key formula '3' to it in customizing.
    I hope this assist you.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • Shipment costs to appear as delivery costs in Purchase

    Hi,
    we want the shipment costs to appear on the purchase order.
    I have followed the sequence as below
    Created a purchase order
    Created a delivery VL31N
    Created a shipment VT01N
    Created a shipment cost document VI01
    I have goods receipt using VL32N, but the shipment cost did not appear in Purchase Order.
    in configuration i have created a new condition in Purchasing ZFRB which has copy shipment cost slected, and added this to the purchasing schema.
    for the shipment cost item category, i configured the settement to delivery costs and left the generate PO blank.
    i would be grateful if someone could help me with configuration that i've missed,
    thanks in advance
    Shadaab

    Please read OSS note 427944 and check SAP online help:
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/83/218ad1068a11d2bf5d0000e8a7386f/frameset.htm
    Prerequisites
    To add shipment costs to delivery costs in the incoming shipments, you need the following settings in Customizing:
    Shipment cost item categories
    Under the Shipment cost types and item categories activity, set the Relevant for costing field to A = Relevant for calculating delivery costs (Delivery costs). This results in the shipment costs not being transferred directly into accounting. The accounting is done via the purchasing functionality for delivery costs.
    Conditions in the purchase order
    Under the Define condition types activity, set the Condition type field to B = Delivery costs. In addition, select the Transfer shipment costs field. The system only shows this field, if you have chosen delivery costs as condition type. In the purchase order, you have to enter the condition type in the item category section. However, you do not enter a value since this value will be determined by the shipment cost document and will then be automatically transferred to the goods receipt document.
    Goods receipt
    To find the relevant shipment cost documents, you must know the corresponding inbound deliveries. Therefore for incoming goods this must relate to confirmation-related goods receipts. Under the Set up confirmation control activity, select the GR-relevant and GR assignment fields for the appropriate confirmation control key (which is then entered in the purchase order).
    Regards,
    Csaba

  • Problem in clearing the shipment costs to transporter

    Hellow,
    Scenario:
    Step1:
    1. I created on PO and I did one inbound delivery with reference to PO.
    2. Then i did inbound shipment, and shipment cost document.
    3. Shipment costs calculated based on weight of the delivery material, Here Weight is 3 To with 300/- per TO.
    Total amount is 900.
    3. Then i did MIGO with reference to inbound delivery.
    4. Now system copied shipment costs to material costs.
    5. Then i did MIRO for planned delivery costs(900/-) with reference to PO.
    Step2:
    1. same way i did one more inbound delivery for open items
    2. Shipment document with reference to Inbound delivery.
    3. Shipment cost document created, Here also only 3 To weight, but the freight rate is 200/- per TO, total cost is 600 only.
    4. I did MIGO with reference to Inbound delivery
    5. When i do the MIRO with reference to same PO for remaining 600/- planned delivery costs, system is not copying the 600/- from PO. It is copying the average on 900+600 for remaining delivery costs.
    If we go with same freight rates this kind of problem is not happening. In different rate situation only this problem is occuring.
    Can i have any solutions please?
    With regards
    Lakki

    Hi Lakki,
    May I know what's the condition type for the freight charges involved so that we could proceed to help you further.
    Thank you.
    Best regards,
    HC.

Maybe you are looking for