Should web images be sharpened or does Photoshop just "handle" jpegs better now & it's unnecessary

We have between 3-4MB "full size" print-quality product images that get downsized to about 204px wide x 300, and then proportionally smaller yet to 135 wide and 100 wide for our website.
The graphic designers I work with say there's no need to be sharpening these web-destined images--that "Photoshop handles jpegs better now and there's no point in sharpening at all." (This was in response to them providing images that are oversharpened and my asking them to adjust their settings.)
I'm only a "nonprofessional" photoshop user--but that just doesn't sound right to me (unless we don't want crisp images on our website).
Can anyone enlighten me if I am out of date and it's true no sharpening is needed?
Or if sharpening would be of value, provide a constructive response I could share with them and even an article I could direct them to with information/guidance on finding a good "bulk" way to do some sharpening (expecting the 3 sizes to be done by hand for the 50 or so product images a month isn't an option)?

It depends. I'd say 300 pixels is so small that sharpening may be counter-productive - the pixels may just get in the way.
Around 800-1000 pixels or up I always sharpen, and I have a couple of actions for it. Personally I don't like the "Bicubic Sharper (reduction)" algorithm, I think it overdoes it, and in the wrong way, giving just that oversharpened look. I prefer "Bicubic Smoother" and sharpen afterwards.
Confining sharpening to midtones, fading out high and low, always helps to reduce halos. There's a section of about 20 steps in my actions that does just that, trouble is I can't remember what they were...

Similar Messages

  • Does photoshop elements enable save for web for a batch of photos?

    does photoshop elements enable save for web or ready for web for a batch of photos ?

    Hi Patonabike,
    You can batch save images as jpeg, png, tiff etc. using Process Multiple Files. This feature will even allow you to batch resize them (as long as they are the same orientation and aspect ratio). However, the resulting images may be larger than what you would get if you individually did 'Save for Web' because 'Save for Web' removes the photo's exif data (and Process Multiple Files won't).
    With that said, it depends how you are editing your images and the results you are looking for, if you just want to rescale them or batch edit them - this is one way.
    Hope it helps!
    Clarice

  • I just installed the new firefox for Mac OSX 10.6.8 and when I select an image on a site (right click and copy) and paste in Photoshop 5.5, the image lightens. It does not do this in Safari.

    Question
    I just installed the new firefox for Mac OSX 10.6.8 and when I select an image on a site (right click and copy) and paste in Photoshop 5.5, the image lightens. It does not do this in Safari.

    Firefox, Safari, and PhotoShop each handle embedded color profiles differently. For an add-on that makes it easier to experiment with Firefox's color management options, you might be interested in: [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/color-management/ Color Management :: Add-ons for Firefox]. I haven't tried it myself.

  • Image appearance in Lightroom does not match exported .jpg

    First time user of Lightroom, so be gentle.
    I edit a RAW file in Lightroom and get it looking good, but when I export to jpg I run into a problem where the photo takes on a strong rosy hue.
    This image shows the problem:
    http://www.vaughnsphotoart.com/miscimg/colordifference.jpg
    I took a screenshot of Lightroom, and superimposed the jpg output next to it.
    I have been using RawShooter and have had no problems with the exported files matching the in-program image. I've had pretty good luck getting on-screen views to match my prints. So I'm a little baffled here at what to do. I see others are running into this as well (see http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bc34927/2 ) so a response might help many.
    Am I correct to guess this has something to do with the Adobe ProPhoto color space?
    What steps should I take to get my in-program image appearance match the exported version? I suspect I am missing a calibration process to get my color spaces to match, but I don't know how to affect the one Lightroom uses. Can anyone give some straightforward advice on what to do here?

    I had exactly the same experience as Vaughn and David. I tried to do some tests of my own:
    1. Exported a RAW image from LR as JPG, sRGB color space
    2. Exported the exact same image as JPG specifying Adobe RGB
    3. Exported the exact same image as TIFF (8bit, LZW compression), sRGB color
    4. Exported the exact same image as TFF (8bit, LZW compression), Adobe RGB color space
    The resulting images can be seen in the following web album:
    http://picasaweb.google.com/Chris.Diewald/TestExportsFromAdobeLightroom.
    (Most web browsers still do not care about embedded color space tags, but it appears that the images on the web page do not have a color-space tag anymore ! Still, they demonstrate what I see in other software on my screen.)
    5. I opened these 4 images in Photoshop CS2, working space Adobe RGB (!), but specifically using the embedded profile (in the case of of sRGB exports).
    Result: All 4 images - whether jpeg or TIFF, sRGB or Adobe RGB - look identical. And they are all identical to the likeness seen in LR!
    6. I opened the sRGB images (jpg and TIFF) in Photoshop, but this time without preserving the embedded sRGB profile ("discard the embedded profile, don't color-manage"):
    Result: The two sRGB images show a distinctive shift towards red and are a tad brighter. This was expected in a way.
    7. I opened these 4 images in Microsoft Fax and Picture Viewer:
    Result: All 4 images, whether TIFF or JPG, whether sRGB was embedded or Adobe RGB, are displayed identically, but *different* from what is seen in LR - more red and a bit brighter. Just like in Photoshop when the embedded sRGB profile was ignored.
    8. Out of curiosity, I opened the 4 images in Picasa 2.5 (so popular with amateurs, so nice and so blindingly fast with huge masses of images. No comment on LR here...).
    Result: Whether JPG or TIFF, the sRGB image comes out as redder and brighter, the AdobeRGB image exactly as viewed in LR!
    9. Last Test: I opened the 4 images in Paintshop Pro 9.01
    Result: same as those reported for Picasa. sRGB is not as seen in LR!
    What does that suggest? I am not a color-space expert, so I leave that to those who know. But I am worrying whether LR really does what it says when I export?
    Chris

  • Web Module Output Sharpening question

    Is the web gallery output sharpening in LR2 only available when a web gallery template makes it available? I can't seem to find it under Output Settings for most of my installed gallery templates? I'm guessing that the developer has to make this available and/or the template has to be LR2 aware. Not sure though. Of course, it would be very convenient to make web gallery output sharpening available for any template installed.

    I have to follow a somewhat convoluted workflow when doing my photobooks. But in a nutshell.
    Import Raw Image from EOS 30D
    Apply color correction and capture sharpening (I sharpen until it looks good onscreen)
    Export images at their largest size to my Links folder for InDesign. (I design all of the photo book in InDesign.)
    Once I know all the sizes for sure in InDesign, I run a script that takes each image into photoshop and sizes the images to 100% and imports them back into InDesign.
    I take the sized down images back into LR2 and output sharpen them and update them in InDesign.
    I know it's not the greatest workflow, but it seems the the easiest and quickest. I wish there was some way for InDesign and LR to communicate the correct image sizes. But I haven't discovered anything like that yet.

  • Images pasted into mail from photoshop are drastically reduced in size.

    At work, I am constantly sending previews of artwork through email. I CmdShiftC in Photoshop to copy merged (this essentially takes a screen shot of your current selection in a Photoshop document, then I Cmd+V to paste it into mail.
    I have been doing this exact process for over a year now, it works every time, the images are pasted at actual size and are not modified in any way regardless of how huge they were.
    This morning they suddenly started showing up as dinky, useless thumbnails.
    There is no option in mail I can find to control this, and the multitude of other posts in this forum about the same complaint mention a little popup in the bottom right when you have an attached image. I do not have this popup, there is nothing in the bottom right of my window.
    Why is this happening, and how do I fix it?

    Finchypoo wrote:
    At work, I am constantly sending previews of artwork through email. I CmdShiftC in Photoshop to copy merged (this essentially takes a screen shot of your current selection in a Photoshop document, then I Cmd+V to paste it into mail.
    I have been doing this exact process for over a year now, it works every time, the images are pasted at actual size and are not modified in any way regardless of how huge they were.
    This morning they suddenly started showing up as dinky, useless thumbnails.
    There is no option in mail I can find to control this, and the multitude of other posts in this forum about the same complaint mention a little popup in the bottom right when you have an attached image.
    it's not a popup, it's a little scroll button. and you should be getting it when you attach images. however, in my experience, sometimes this button doesn't show up for whatever reason. the following method works for me when I run into this problem (which happens with some regularity btw). start a new blank outgoing message and attach an image to it. don't do it from photoshop. just drag some large image from finder to the message composition window. hopefully, the scroll button will show up. adjust it to "actual size" and close that message composition window. next time you attach an image to a measge it will use the same setting to display the image, i.e. 'actual size".
    I do not have this popup, there is nothing in the bottom right of my window.
    Why is this happening, and how do I fix it?

  • Sending a photo heavy PDF for book printing on a web press.  Convert photo in photoshop first or Acrobat 11?

    Hi,
         The printing company for our photo book on Loons, uses roll fed web presses.  They have asked for a pdf set to X-1a.
    First soft proof was light and washed out.  Printer had us increase saturation and contrast.  Second proof
    all our blue water photos come out more purple then blue. 
    We currently  used srgb jpeg photos embedded in a ms word document.  We used acrobat 11 to create the pdf using the request X-1a
    setting.
        Should we have converted the photos in photoshop to the requested setting first and then embedded them in word?
    Thanks for any help.

    Can you show us screen shots of your X-1 PDF Settings ( i.e., Color )?  The reason why I ask is my default Distiller PDF-X1a:2001 Settings use a working space of RGB = sRGB IEC61966-2.1; and CMYK = US Web Coated (SWOP) v2 with the "Color Management Policies: "Convert All Colors to CMYK" ( default ); Rendering Intent ( default is "Preserve" ).  Have you discussed these settings with the print service provider?  These settings, if they are identical in Acrobat 11, would appear to have the same RGB work space as your original sRGB based pics. I sense that Word, although not a color managed application, would work as an image carrier into Acrobat 11 where the image files may retain their profiles going into Acrobat 11 and remain intact going out of Acrobat 11 via a PDF-X1a.  In which case, the print service provider then RIP and Prints the file for a hardcopy proof. In your case, the previous digital printer did a good job reproducing the photos as you supplied them, Word or no Word.  The question now becomes what changed with this new service provider?  Their prepress people must of accepted your documents and pushed them through their workflow.  So, what changed? I know of no way to "swap" images using Acrobat.  In your case, it may be a matter of saving a second set of files or the entire book document as a copy and replacing the pics in that file, then create a second PDF-X1a file.  And, as a third option, use InDesign ( however, no point in using it until you've determined where the problem with quality lies ).  If I assume the printer told you that the sRGB files were sufficient and, if you used the X-1 PDF Settings when Saving As > PDF, that would be their preferred workflow and the image files rendered dull and unsaturated ( as they did in your case ), and the printer recommended you increase the saturation and HUE of the images ( which he did ) and the entire workflow worked for a digital printer in the past ( which it did ), then something changed with this new print service provider.  You have to find out from them what it could be.  It could be something with their direct-to-plate equipment.  I believe it merits further research and development with the new service provider.  There is a solution.  You just have to find it.
    "Once the pdf is created could I swap out the photos
    for ones that had been converted from RGB to CMYK in photoshop with  Rendering Intent and Black Point Compensation etc. filled. "...
    Wait a minute.  You did a RGB-to-CMYK conversion in Photoshop?  Why?  I thought you embedded the RGB files in Word?  Then, Acrobat did the conversion using the X-1 settings mentioned above.
      "How hard would it be to dump my word document into InDesign with  the newly created RGB or CMYK photos would it work better?  Is the learning curve too much of a hassle for one off?"...
    Yes it would.  But, your procedures worked for the digital printer.  Why not now with the new printer?  That's my question.  Since Acrobat's X-1 settings have a work space of sRGB ( assumed ), then your sRGB files should render appropriately and they do not.  You have to find out what works for this new print service provider and, whatever Photoshop Color Setting RGB workspace you use, use it in Acrobat 11.  Discuss the entire document and Photoshop setups with the new print service provider.

  • ERROR ITMS-9000: "File given does not match type JPEG ... Image is likely corrupt

    Hi ALl,
    On compliing my book  get these errors with ITunes producer...I've resaved the files out with photoshop and they seems fine?
    Package Summary:
    1 package(s) were not uploaded because they had problems:
              /Users/Umran/Music/iTunes Producer/Playlists/9780957408654.itmsp - Error Messages:
                        Apple's web service operation was not successful
                        Unable to authenticate the package: 9780957408654.itmsp
                        ERROR ITMS-9000: "File given does not match type JPEG Image because of these validation issues: ; Error=com.apple.jingle.leghorn.fileformat.ValidationError@1cf629f[userString=An unknown error occured while parsing. Image is likely corrupt.  Exception message: null]" at Book (MZItmspBookPackage)
                        ERROR ITMS-9000: "File given does not match type JPEG Image because of these validation issues: ; Error=com.apple.jingle.leghorn.fileformat.ValidationError@1801285[userString=We reached the end of the file before we expected. Image is likely corrupt]" at Book (MZItmspBookPackage)
                        ERROR ITMS-9000: "File given does not match type JPEG Image because of these validation issues: ; Error=com.apple.jingle.leghorn.fileformat.ValidationError@1e056e9[userString=We reached the end of the file before we expected. Image is likely corrupt]" at Book (MZItmspBookPackage)
                        ERROR ITMS-9000: "File given does not match type JPEG Image because of these validation issues: ; Error=com.apple.jingle.leghorn.fileformat.ValidationError@11d58e0[userString=We reached the end of the file before we expected. Image is likely corrupt]" at Book (MZItmspBookPackage)
                        ERROR ITMS-9000: "File given does not match type JPEG Image because of these validation issues: ; Error=com.apple.jingle.leghorn.fileformat.ValidationError@127c00e[userString=We reached the end of the file before we expected. Image is likely corrupt]" at Book (MZItmspBookPackage)
                        ERROR ITMS-5107: "VirtualLandscapesTheModernEra20002012.epub: Fixed-layout books must supply a text or bodymatter starting location in the guide." at Book (MZItmspBookPackage)
    Any advice??? Hope someone can help!

    iBookstore Publisher Support send me a fast response email which included some helpful info:
    Please make sure that all image files inside the ePub end with one of the following: ".tif", ".jpg", or ".png" and that the file itself matches the file extension type. To check if the image file matches the file extension type, please right click on the image then select "Get Info". Once the info tab appears, please make sure that the file extension type of the image file matches the "Kind" found under "General".
    For further information regarding embedded images, please refer to the iBookstore Asset Guide, which is available for download in the Deliver Your Content module in iTunes Connect.
    And they INCLUDED THE TRANSPORTER LOG (!), the log generated by iTunes Producer as it tries to upload a book. We were able to search for the Validation Error # within the log and find out which image Producer was trying to upload when it encountered an error. Turns out the problem was a corrupted screenshot jpeg.
    Grateful!

  • Images: CMYK to RGB in photoshop or just export PDF in Indesign as CMYK?

    Hello again,
    This community has been of great help no end thus far.
    For my booklet, i would say 90% of the layout is images created in Illustrator. What is best practice here for scans or images which have been screen printed or ar basically RGB?
    I am unsure whether it is worthwhile converting images to CMYK in photsohop and then playing with them in Illustrator and then finally placing in Illustrator because of the following:
    Why do this if on "export PDF"  i can use press settings. Would this not convert EVERYTHING in my Indesign booklet to CMYK ready material???
    I'm unsure what to do?
    Best Regards
    Don

    The only reason you might want to convert to CMYK before export is if, and this is the most important factor, you already know the correct output profile for the device on which this will be printed and you will NEVER want to repurpose the art for another device, and if you want to be able to tweak the image and sharpen after conversion.
    If all you were going to do in Photoshop is convert to CMYK, and not do addtional edits after, there is no advantage, at all, to doing that over converting on export from ID.

  • Does Photoshop Elements 12 do setup for Gallery Wrap for canvas printing?

    Does Photoshop Elements 12 do a setup for Gallery Wrap for canvas printing?
    is there a plug-in available?

    You shouldn't need a plugin if you follow the steps from the video linked to below that should work in photoshop elements 12
    http://www.breathingcolor.com/blog/how-to-create-a-mirrored-edge-for-a-gallery-wrap/
    Two command are in different places in photoshop elements
    Image>Resize>Canvas Size
    and
    Image>Transform>Free Transform

  • Image size from Illustrator to Photoshop

    I'm new to Illustrator and may just be overlooking something here, but here's my the background and question:
    I took a screen shot of an image and opened it in Photoshop CS3. I've cropped out a portion I want to use and save the file as a .eps file and open it with Illustrator. Within Illustrator, I recreate the image at the same size as the image I opened (I'm looking at both images at 100% view). I save my new image as a .eps file and then open it with Photoshop. For some reason, the image is about 50% bigger in Photoshop than it was in Illustrator. Any ideas? Is a 100% viewing percentage not really showing the correct size of the image? Or is does the issue lie with how Photoshop CS3 interprets a .eps file from Illustrator CS4?
    Thanks in advance for any information/advice.

    You have just discovered image resolution and its effect on the display of pixel based images.
    In Illustrator there's no resolution. Objects have a defined size and Illy assumes a monitor resolution of 72 ppi as a basis for it's assumptions on the display of graphics and for it's calculations of this 100%.
    When exporting into pixel based file formats you can choose the resolution.
    In Photoshop the "100%" has no relation to the actual size of things (as defined in Illustrator) but means that one pixel of the image is one pixel of your monitor.
    When you open an EPS you get a dialog box in which you specify the way photoshop has to calculate the pixels from the vector and the resolution you want. When you enter 72 ppi you should get the size you expected. But that won't be enough to print.
    BTW: the workflow of making a screenshot and converting your image to and fro maybe harmful to printing results.

  • Cropping web images to paste into power point

    I have a web image that I would like to crop using photoshop elements, and paste into power point with out a background.
    I used the magnetic lasso tool to out line the crop area, select cut, and when I paste it into power point, a rectangular background comes with it. How can I paste just the selected area?

    It is probably a format thing
    Jpegs do not have transparency. That is probably what you are using.
    Gifs have transparency. I think Tiffs and PNGs do also.
    Try one of those.
    I just noticed you used copy>paste
    Maybe you should try insert>picture>from file.
    If you can't get this to work, try matching the power point background in PSE. That will give you the illusion of transparency.

  • Can't view image that was made on photoshop on my mac on a vista computer.

    I made an image for my dad in photoshop and saved it as a gif on my mac. I put it in my dropbox in a shared folder and added my dad to the shared folder. He can see on his windows vista computer in dropbox that the image is there but when he tries to open it there is an "X" where the image should be or it says its corrupt. This also happens when I send him the image in an email or if I give it to him on a flash drive. Does anyone know why this is happening? How can he see the image I made on my mac on his Windows Visa Computer?
    P.S. This also happens with every other image file type. When I send the image to my friend who has a Mac, he can open it with no problem.
    ~Thanks

    It's a good idea to go ahead and post how you fixed it, just in case someone else comes along with the same problem.

  • Downloading Linked Web Images

    I do a lot of photo-manipulations, and one thing I need are lots of different images to play around with. A couple of the women in my manipulations group are very good at searching out images and post new galleries of images each week. Downloading these images is a long, repetitive process (not as long as trying to search for them myself, but still hours each week if I want to snag them all).
    Automator is supposed to help deal with repetitive processes, and indeed there is a sample workflow called "Downloading Linked Web Images" on the front Automator page. It goes like this:
    1> Get current webpage from Safari
    2> Get image URLs from webpage (set to Get URLs linked from these webpages)
    3> Download URLs (where: Pictures is set in example, I set it to where: Incoming Downloads, the folder I download everything to and which is set up as a safe zone in Norton Anti-Virus)
    The workflow goes on with the following step to add the photos to iPhoto, but I stopped it here because I don't want the photos in iPhoto.
    4> Import photos into iPhoto (add to: either choose album with a pull-down menu or new album with a input box for the name, checkbox for "delete the source images after importing them")
    This workflow doesn't work, and I don't know why.
    On one of her galleries it said it sucessfully completed, but all it did was download an html file that when clicked on gave me a linking instructions page, which linked to the small version of the first photo in the gallery. (I replaced her actual name with "username" in the address to protect her privacy.)
    href=http://username.multiply.com/photos/photo/15/1>353474_3995.jpg
    On her other galleries, the workflow stopped at step 2 with this message:
    AppleScript Error:
    The command exited with a non-zero status. (255)
    I have no idea what that error is.
    The steps I currently go through to download photos from her galleries are (again I've substituted "username" for her real name in all the addresses):
    1) Open gallery address in Safari. They take this form:
    http://username.multiply.com/photos/album/15
    2) Double click on one of the thumbnails, which opens a page with a small version of that single photo. The addresses take this form:
    http://username.multiply.com/photos/photo/15/1
    3) Double click on the small version of the photo to open the large version. The large version addresses look like this:
    http://username.multiply.com/photos/hi-res/15/1?xurl=%2Fphotos%2Fphoto%2F15%2F1
    4) Command-click on large photo and choose "Save image to Incoming Downloads."
    5) Either hit the "back" link on the large picture page or the back button on Safari to get back to the small picture page.
    6) Either hit the back button on Safari to go back to the gallery page, or hit the "next" link on the small picture page to go to the small picture page for the next photo in the gallery.
    7) Either: a) from gallery page, repeat from step 2, or b) from small version page of next photo in gallery, repeat from step 3.
    Continue to repeat until I've downloaded all the pictures I like, or I'm totally exhausted, or I have no more time. This one person's galleries have between 60 and 300 photos each, and she updates three to five galleries each week.
    My group also has other people who put up galleries of images less often, but usually with more images. Last weekend one woman put up a gallery with 4387 pictures!
    Downloading pictures one at a time takes forever, and the process should be able to be automated. If someone posts galleries that aren't entirely new images every week, it would still be much faster to download everything and trash the pictures I didn't want.
    Does anyone know why this workflow won't work? It's one of the two sample workflows Apple has posted to demonstrate how Automator works, so I'm very surprised to find it doesn't work. BTW, I did download and install the latest version of Automator & X-code tools before trying the sample workflows.
    Can someone help?
    Thanks,
    chinchilla_gurl

    James
    Not sure I can help you with Automator but here's two options:
    Hazel (http://www.noodlesoft.com/hazel.php) will watch a folder for you and import the pics to a specified album
    Or
    Right click on the iPhoto Package File in Pictures and go 'Show Package Contents' In the resulting window you'll see a folder called 'Auto Import'. Make an alias to the folder and drag it to the desktop. Pics dropped onto that folder will be imported the next time iPhoto launches.
    Regards
    TD

  • Images become dark and saturated Photoshop JPEG

    So I have noticed several people having this problem, and the solutions that work for them don't seem to work for me!
    I start in Camera Raw 8.0, then move to photoshop to crop and tweak a little bit more, then when I save to JPEG and view in windows photo viewer or other medium, the photo is dark and overly saturated.  I understand that photoshop is a color mangaged space, and that most other programs are not, but I still can't figure out how to make what I see in photoshop translate to the JPEG image.  These will eventually be used on a website and I need everything to look as professional as possible.  The image on the right is really dark, especially on the front lawn and porch.
    Here are my color settings:
    If anyone can help, it would be greatly appreciated.

    I suspect that when you're seeing your images not looking right you're viewing them through an incorrectly or incompletely color-managed combination of software and settings.  Note that Internet Explorer, while it does read image color profiles, can ONLY show you proper color if your monitors are set to display the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color space accurately.  It makes the (incorrect) assumption that all monitors are sRGB.  I believe Windows Photo Viewer only does proper color-management if set to display in a window, not full-screen.
    If you're wanting to publish on the web, one generally accepted "least of evils" method is to publish the images with a profile and in the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color space.  At least that way people with "standard gamut" monitors will see them with similar to accurate colors, and folks with properly color-managed setups will see them accurately.  Firefox and Safari do NOT assume your monitor is sRGB, and both use the image and monitor color-profiles during image display.
    In the bottom-center of Camera Raw is what looks like a link for setting workflow options.  If you click it, it will allow you to set Camera Raw to open your images into any of several profiles.  As I recall, the out-of-box default is Adobe RGB.  You *could* consider converting your images to the sRGB color space directly, then whenever you save them they'll be in the color-space that's more likely to be seen properly.  Or you could open them into a wider gamut color space (as they are by default), then Convert them (your last dialog above) to the sRGB color space before saving as JPEG (or use the Save For Web function to do that conversion while creating the JPEG).
    There's really no "one set of best parameters" you can just set and forget for color-management.  All the various settings and functions have a good reason for being provided.  The important thing is to start to understand how color-management works, so you can begin to make the settings and workflow choices that make the most sense for you, to accomplish your goals.
    Note that some programs aren't color-managed at all, still others are improperly doing it, and others actually get it right.  You really can't be sure everyone is going to see your image in the correct colors, so you have to try for a good compromise.  Yes, color-management in the real world is kind of a mess.
    -Noel

Maybe you are looking for