Simultaneous connection from Access connection

Hello,
How to use access connection for two simultaneous connections to a WLAN and a wired Internet to local network (LAN)
Thank you in advance sorry for my english google translations

Please let us know your Windows-version you have installed and what computer you use.
Maybe this also will be helpful:
Userguide for Access Connections for XP: http://download.lenovo.com/ibmdl/pub/pc/pccbbs/mobiles_pdf/c79taac52fr.pdf (french)
User guide for Access Connections for Vista/Win7: http://download.lenovo.com/ibmdl/pub/pc/pccbbs/mobiles_pdf/c79szac51fr.pdf (french)
My home-forum: http://www.thinkpad-forum.de
Wiki: Deutsches ThinkPad-Wiki English ThinkWiki
My ThinkPad-Collection

Similar Messages

Simultaneous connections to the same server from IE and NN

Hi,
We are using iws4.1.
IE5+ can make only atmost 2 simultaneous connections to our server and
NN makes 4 connections.
We found certain pages hosted by iws4.1 like www.netscape.com can make
more than 2 simultaneous connection from same browser.
The above tests are done from a dialup connection
Is there a way to increase the no. of simultaneous connections from both
IE and NN with the knowledge on the end user.
Thanks in advance
rvenky

Could you please post the code, if you do not mind. Also if you could post the connection pool definition of both the pools that would help too.
If the business method is coded in the following way
m1() {
conn1 = // get connection
conn2 = // get another connection
// do some thing with conn1
// do some thing else with conn2
conn1.close();
conn2.close();
Could you try modifying the code in the following way and see if that helps
m1() {
conn1 = // get connection
// do some thing with conn1
conn1.close();
Basically start using conn2 after conn1 is used
conn2 = // get another connection
// do some thing else with conn2
conn2.close();
regards
sankar

Error establishing ODBC connection to Oracle database from Access 2007

I am trying to access via linked tables from Access 2007 my ODBC connections.
I am able to setup and test successfully in the ODBC Data Source Administrator my Data source, and Driver(Oracle in OraHome92), and I used this successfully when I had Access 2003 on this PC.
system details: Oracle 9i, MS Access 2007 on Windows XP
error - call failed:
detailed error from sqlnet.log:
Fatal NI connect error 12560, connecting to:
(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=BEQ)(PROGRAM=oracle)(ARGV0=oracleORCL)(ARGS='(DESCRIPTION=(LOCAL=YES)(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=beq)))'))(CONNECT_DATA=(SID=ORCL)(CID=(PROGRAM=C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office12\MSACCESS.EXE)(HOST=USRN4WNCNH6DDQG)(USER=fznp29))))
VERSION INFORMATION:
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Oracle Bequeath NT Protocol Adapter for 32-bit Windows: Version 9.2.0.1.0 - Production
Time: 05-DEC-2008 11:38:05
Tracing not turned on.
Tns error struct:
nr err code: 0
ns main err code: 12560
TNS-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
ns secondary err code: 0
nt main err code: 530
TNS-00530: Protocol adapter error
nt secondary err code: 126
nt OS err code: 0
Any ideas?

Hi,
Please can you specify how you create your DSN for Oracle connection in ODBC Data Source Administrator?
What did you specify for the TNS Service Name?
What is the content of your TNSNAMES.ORA file?
Thx
Mireille

How do I block a computer from accessing connection via wireless router?

This is my first linksys router. My previous one had an option that i could choose to block a specific computer from accessing my wireless connection. I cannot find an option like that with my linksys router. I have to leave the connection open becuase of issues with other computers in the household not being able to connect with security being used. Thanks!

what is the model number of your router?
if the wireless security wont work try to use the mac filter.you have to get the mac address of your computers in the house and you have to input it in the mac filter window on the set up page of your router.

Restrict number of simultaneous connection from client to EJB bean

I have EJB bean and JavaSE client. I want to restrict number of simultaneous connection from client to EJB bean. For example to maximum allowed 3. How I can do it?

:) but answer is too general.
I want to know how to design such "simple reference counting". As I understand it is not recommended to use static variables in EJB. so how to implement such counting in a right way?
Edited by: NoName on Aug 20, 2009 1:25 AM
Edited by: NoName on Aug 20, 2009 1:31 AM

Whenever I try to open Firefox it says cannot establish connection, maybe your firewall is preventing us from accessing the web.

Whenever I try to open Firefox it says cannot establish connection, maybe your firewall is preventing us from accessing the web. Even though I've let Firefox through my firewall, this message still appears. And whenever I try to redownload it, it just says installation failed. It does this with all installations... Is there something wrong with my computer? How do I fix it?

Sometimes you only disable the user interface of security software, but the firewall or anti-virus services are still running in the background.
It is possible that your security software (firewall, anti-virus) blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
Remove all rules for Firefox and the plugin-container from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process and the updater process.
See:
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Server+not+found
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firewalls
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/fix-problems-connecting-websites-after-updating

AIR-LAP1131AG-E-K9 maximum of simultaneous connections

Hi,
Does any body know what is the maximum of simultaneous connections that the AIR-LAP1131AG-E-K9 access point supports?
Any help is much appreciated!

Currently it is suggested around 25 devices per radio. It really depends on the bandwidth that is required by applications. I have seen 50+ on and ap with just web and email traffic. I have also seen up to 4 with video transfers.
I know with the 7.2 code, you can specify they max user per radio or ap.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

DPS simultaneous connection help

I'm running DPS 5.2 SP3. I have 2 network groups, the first one is for anonymous access only. The first group has an on SSL bind action to change network groups to the SSL only group, which requires SSL. This is required, to restrict password based bind's on the insecure 389 LDAP port, but still allow anonymous non ssl connections to DPS. I.e password based binds are rejected on 389, but accepted on 636. Anonymous binds can connect on either 389 or 636.
Problem occurs if you try and restrict the number of simultanous connections per IP address. This setting works on the first anonymous network group, but fails on the second SSL group. The counter will start at 1, but it won't reset back to zero after an unbind.
Example: The counter for IP :xxx is now 1 and the limit is 5. On the 6th bind, the logs then complain and say:
The counter for IP: xxx is now 6 and the limit is 5, maximum number of connections from same IP reached for this group: Change group failing.
Has anyone had a similar problem? I had a ticket with Sun back in september, and they never resolved the problem, and told me I was running the lastest ldapfwd binary. I'm not even sure what the latest ldapfwd binary is, since it's very difficult to find any information on sunsolve.

albert geven wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> The connection of multiple multimeters to the gpib bus is normal, the
> only thing you need to do is switch them each to a unique address on
> this bus.
> Your program can best initialise all multimeters once in the beginning
> of your program and read out those meters when appropriate.
With many instruments there are two types of "initialise."
One type, which is a reset, choose range, etc., as you suggest can
be done at the beginning of a program or section of a program.
However, the other type of initialize is to sent the SCPI INIT command
to the instrument. This command tells the instrument to take a measurement
(or scan of measurements).
When dealing with multiple multimeters, there are at least 2 ways of
handling measurements. The slow way deals with one instrument at a
time -- using the SCPI commands INIT, wait FETCH?, or perhaps just READ?
sent to each instrument. It is slow because each instrument must wait
for the previous instrument to finish before it can start.
The better way is to set up each instrument for the desired measurement.
If simultaneous triggering is needed, either use some type of external
trigger or BUS trigger if the instrument can use it. After all instruments
are set up, issue the INIT command to each instrument, then trigger.
when all measurements are completed, use the FETC? command to get the
results from each instrument. Note that there may be Plug&Play drivers
to issue these commands for your instrument.
[email protected]
www.CompleteTest.com

Can I share my internet with my Ipad and simultaneously connect to a airport express that I use to remotely connect speakers?

Can I share my internet from my Imac with my Ipad and simultaneously connect to a airport express that I use to remotely to connect speakers?
The big problem that I'm having is that when internet sharing via the airport I can not simultaneously connect with my airport express. It would be great to be able to share internet from my Imac so I can be using my Ipad and at the sametime have my wife use the airport express to stream music in a different room. It would be awesome to be able to have the ability to do both. Does anybody know how?

Unless your iMac was made before 2006 (this forum is for old iMacs), you might get better assistance by posting in one of the following forum areas:
AirPort
Using iPad
iMac (Intel)

Help needed : javamail Too many simultaneous connections

Hello
i'm using javamail to develop a webmail
i've created a service Class , and all things works well , but i have a serious problem when i browse my webmail ( viewing folders: inbox / spam / etc or messages) i get an error saying :
Too many simultaneous connections. (Failure)
i know that the imap server dosen't support more than 10 simultaneous connections.
But i can't say to users using my webmail to do not a lot of actions !!! , and also when i use thunderbird for example it works fine without errors even if i do a lot of actions/connections
How can i solve that problem ?
Thanks
A1 OK [email protected] authenticated (Success)
A2 CAPABILITY
* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT LITERAL+ IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA ID XLIST CHILDREN X-GM-EXT-1
A2 OK Success
A3 SELECT INBOX
DEBUG: no connections in the pool, creating a new one
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen \*)]
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 616267767]
* 7 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 1]
* OK [UIDNEXT 90]
A3 OK [READ-WRITE] INBOX selected. (Success)
A4 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen)+
+* OK Gimap ready for requests from MyIP 24if2631473eyx.55+
+A0 CAPABILITY+
+* 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen))+
+A4 OK Success+
+* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA XLIST CHILDREN XYZZY+
+A0 OK Thats all she wrote! 24if2631473eyx.55+
+A1 LOGIN myemail mypwd+
+A1 OK [email protected] authenticated (Success)+
+A2 CAPABILITY+
+* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT LITERAL+ IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA ID XLIST CHILDREN X-GM-EXT-1
A2 OK Success
A3 SELECT INBOX
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen \*)]
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 616267767]
* 7 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 1]
* OK [UIDNEXT 90]
A3 OK [READ-WRITE] INBOX selected. (Success)
A4 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen)
* OK Gimap ready for requests from MyIP 23if2388548eya.46
A0 CAPABILITY
* 1 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen))
A4 OK Success
* CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 UNSELECT IDLE NAMESPACE QUOTA XLIST CHILDREN XYZZY
A0 OK Thats all she wrote! 23if2388548eya.46
A1 LOGIN custom.infoma1 mypwd
A1 NO [ALERT] *Too many simultaneous connections. (Failure)*
A2 LOGOUT
* BYE Logout Requested 23if2388548eya.46
A2 OK Quoth the raven, nevermore... 23if2388548eya.46
A4 CLOSE
A4 CLOSE

Thunderbird supports disconnected or offline operation. It can disconnect from the server and then reconnect later
and synchronize its state, so that you never know it was disconnected.
You can do that too, but it's a lot of work.
For webmail, the simplest approach is usually to have only one folder open at a time for each user.
If your IMAP server is limiting you to 10 connections total, across all users, get a new IMAP server.

Does the socket implementation suport only 2 simultaneous connections?

Hi all,
I implemented this server the traditional way:
public void run() {
   while(state.isRunning()) {
      try {
         System.out.println("listening...");
         sourceSock = ssock.accept();
         System.out.println("new incoming connection");
         sourceSock.setSoTimeout(config.getHttpTimeout());
         new Thread(new ProxyHttpConnectionWorker(sourceSock, config)).start();
      } catch (IOException _ex) {
         config.out.trace(_ex.getMessage());
}It seems ok to me. I implemented it several times in a lot of situations.
However, this time I noted that after two simultaneous socket connections are opened (via accept()), all other connections I try to make from a client are blocking until one of the first two sockets close().
I mean, it seems to be blocking the incoming connections in the accept() method, because the string "listening..." was printed, but the string "new incoming connection" is only printed when one of the two initial sockets close()
Why is this happening? Is this correct?
I implemented it with J2SE 1.3.1 in a windows NT 4 workstation machine.
Is this an Operating System problem? A TCP/IP problem? Is the problem in the java socket implementation? Is there any flaw in my code?
Thank you all in advance,
Filipe Fedalto

Hi, Chuck
It could also be the case.
Actually, I am implementing a proxy server. All the major work is done and were it not this accept() problem it would be functioning very well.
The server is running in my machine and I am testing it by issuing 4 simultaneous HTTP requests from Internet Explorer 5.5 from my own machine itself. So, you see, this could be the problem, according to what you've just said.
I try to open the 4 browser connections simultaneously, but the servers' accept() method only seems to receive 2 of them at a time.
What do you think about it?
Just in case, I will try and test it using Netscape. Let's see if the number of simultaneous connections change...
Notwithstanding, why do the browsers limit the number of concurrent connections? I might think that this is because it is better to open a single page or two faster than trying to open 5 or 6 pages slowly... is this the point?
Thank you very much!
Filipe Fedalto

Does NET8 2-tier server have a simultaneous connection limit ?

Does NET8 2-tier server have a simultaneous connection limit ?
I came across one article that has a 100 simultaneous connection listing for 2-tier.
Please let me know
George

Yes, My WRT610N is currently using both 2.4Ghz and 5.0Ghz at the same time. I'm using WPA2 Private with AES on both frequencies. I'm currently getting 135mbps on both frequencies. Both are stable at 30 feet but the Actual throughput is better on the 2.4Ghz frequency and also range.
I think the reason that i'm restricted to 135mbps is the Intel wifi link 5100 can only transfer at a maximum of 150 mbps.
This router has always been stable although i did loose my network one night it dived to 6mbps for apparently no reason at all. But i believe that this issue was due to an update on my Laptop. I fixed this by removing the Wifi adapter drivers and reinstalling them.
5 G Network
Mode:   Wireless-N Only
Network Name (SSID):   N/A
Radio Band:   Wide - 40MHz Channel
Wide Channel:   38
Standard Channel:   36
Security:   WPA2-Personal
SSID Broadcast:   Enabled
2.4 G Network
Mode:   Mixed
Network Name (SSID):   N/A
Radio Band:   Wide - 40MHz Channel
Wide Channel:   8
Standard Channel:   6
Security:   WPA2-Personal
SSID Broadcast:   Enabled
** Note these settings are from the Status / Wireless Network page on the router, all wide channel / standard channels are actually set to Auto

Simultaneous connection of more than one unit of GPIB device

Dear all out there,
Would anyone has any idea/ solution in programming of ATE that makes Simultaneous connection of more than one unit?
What's the better, if not the best, way of initialisation, acquisition and report generation for such system? without significant delay incurred.
For instants,
1. Initialise X number of, say, Agilent 34401A multimeter (GPIB)
2. Acquiring of meter readings from each meter, limit check and write to respective report
Any idea/ sample code/ solution is very much appreciated.
Regards
ian.f k
Ian F
Since LabVIEW 5.1... 7.1.1... 2009, 2010
依恩与LabVIEW
LVVILIB.blogspot.com

albert geven wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> The connection of multiple multimeters to the gpib bus is normal, the
> only thing you need to do is switch them each to a unique address on
> this bus.
> Your program can best initialise all multimeters once in the beginning
> of your program and read out those meters when appropriate.
With many instruments there are two types of "initialise."
One type, which is a reset, choose range, etc., as you suggest can
be done at the beginning of a program or section of a program.
However, the other type of initialize is to sent the SCPI INIT command
to the instrument. This command tells the instrument to take a measurement
(or scan of measurements).
When dealing with multiple multimeters, there are at least 2 ways of
handling measurements. The slow way deals with one instrument at a
time -- using the SCPI commands INIT, wait FETCH?, or perhaps just READ?
sent to each instrument. It is slow because each instrument must wait
for the previous instrument to finish before it can start.
The better way is to set up each instrument for the desired measurement.
If simultaneous triggering is needed, either use some type of external
trigger or BUS trigger if the instrument can use it. After all instruments
are set up, issue the INIT command to each instrument, then trigger.
when all measurements are completed, use the FETC? command to get the
results from each instrument. Note that there may be Plug&Play drivers
to issue these commands for your instrument.
[email protected]
www.CompleteTest.com

LD-416 Overloaded By Simultaneous Connections?

Hello all,
We have a LD-416 running software version 4.2.4. The LD is setup to balance port 80 connections to seven real servers behind one virtual IP.
Lately, we have had an issue where if enough simultaneous connections hit the virtual IP address, the LD fails to distribute them. Our web server logs are showing one or two out of the seven carrying the brunt of the simultaneous connections. It is never the same two servers during any such instance.
When this occurs, we'll often see large (hundreds) unchanging connection numbers to each server according to "show real" where our normal load is between 20-40. Checking the monitoring on our web servers, they aren't registering anything beyond the normal connections. What is really troubling is that if we reset web services on the web servers during this time, the individual servers never show as failed like they do during normal operation.
Mind you, the traffic is valid traffic. It is coming from people opening a link in a newsletter we have sent. The page they are viewing is not very intensive, so the web servers should be able to handle the load, were it being properly distributed. However, near as we can determine, it seems that the Local Director is crumbling under the sudden load.
Is there a limit to the number of simultaneous connections an LD-416 can process? Is there anything in the settings I can tweak to help it along?
Regards,
Robert Kropiewnicki

According to the results of 'show predictor', it is already set to leastconn.
Virtual Machine(s) Predictor Slowstart
www.structuredweb.com:80:0:tcp leastconns roundrobin
Regards,
Robert Kropiewnicki

Simultaneous connect to same iCal calendar

All:
Here's the set up using iCal Server on Mac OS X Server 10.5.7:
User A (boss) has an account on the iCal server.
User B (admin asst) sets up an account in iCal with User A's account name and password and gets full access to User A's calendars.
In some brief tests of creating and deleting calendars, it looks as though this will work fine (simultaneous connection via the same account to the same calendar by multiple users) and accomplishes two goals:
--It allows either User A or User B to mark an event or to do as private. (When User B is a delegate of User A's calendars and has write privileges, User B still cannot make an event or to do private.)
--It allows User B to sync User A's calendar to her iPhone (something that can't be done if User B is merely a delegate of User A's calendar).
In other words, it seems to give you everything that making User B a delegate with read/write privileges for User A's calendar does, and then some. (Sorry that's quite a tangled sentence; read it slowly.)
To keep the calendars in sync to the greatest degree possible, both users have the calendar refresh every minute.
Has anyone seen a problem with a set up like this? Could two simultaneous users corrupt the calendar somehow?
TIA,
mm

Temporary google issue.

Simultaneous connection from Access connection

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for