Singl GL for vat collected on Sales

Hi
My client requires a single GL for VAT/LST/CST. The standard SAP reports provide for a condition type and region based VAT collection. However, the user faces a problem while remitting the payment for VAT. There are so many line items, that he is not aware how to select the open items for making payments for vat/cst/lst. How can we select the open items for a particular location using a single location
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Similar Messages

Single Delivery for more than 2 Sales Order

Hi,
How to create a single delivery for the different sales order?
If it is possible how we will do the post goods Issue for the different Items?

Hi,
There are lots of thread there in SDN, Search them. for ur reference these are some
Multiple Sales Order to Single Delivery
Delivery Doc. against multiple Sales Order
Thanks,
raja

Single condition for contract and domestic sales

Dear All,
I just want to know is there any possibility to go with one condition type for contract and regular sales as in case of regular price will be determined automatically and not modifible, where as based on the requirement contract price condition will be created.
Now under this process there is a problem and it is picking contract price in regular sales order also, but i want contract price need to be triggered only when it is referenced.
Thanks
Srini

Hi,
As I understood you want to have same Condition type (Say PR00) to have in both Sales Document types. (In other words to have same condition type in both pricing procedures used for Contract & Sales Order)
Since you want to set "Not modifiable" when it's in the sales order & when it's in Contract you want to manually enter same condition, this is not possible.
Because, "Manual entries" control is inside the Condition Type.
IMG Path:
Sales and Distribution -> Basic Functions -> Pricing -> Pricing Control -> Define Condition Types -> Maintain Condition Types
Therefore you can set it only for a condition type. Where is for PR00 it's either "Manual entry has priority" or "No limitations" or "Automatic entry has priority" or " Not possible to process manually"
Therefore you cannot have same condition to satisfy both requirements. In that case you have to have 2 condition types,
Best regards,
Anupa

No single edition for master collection?

so, when i was deciding whether to buy the master collection and the creative cloud, i chose master collection CS6 because under “reasons to buy” its stated that toy can publish to the iPad , wish i could upload a sceenshot but there’s the link:
http://volumelicensing.adobe.com/store/adbevlus/en_US/pd/productID.249293600
check under “reasons to buy” / Access to Adobe Digital Publishing Suite
heres the full quote:
Access to Adobe Digital Publishing Suite
Access Adobe Digital Publishing Suite from within InDesign to publish engaging digital documents for a range of tablet devices. New Single Edition now available for publishing to iPad.
i just find a little frustrated to know that i bought the master collection and its only available to creative cloud subscriber, now when i call adobe they tell me “sorry, you have to upgrade to creative cloud.” my response is how can i upgrade and pay an extra $600 more when i already have the master collection. THIS is really frustrating and misleading. If i knew i would have returned it immediately and changed. How can i fix this? i cant be the only one going thru this.
i think adobe should at least come with a creative cloud membership for people who bought the licenses.

Sorry, don't know what to tell you. But no, I don't see a whole of people complaining about this.
People made their choice based on available information. On a positive you get to use CS6 pretty much forever while Creative Cloud members only get to use it for as long as they keep paying.
You can still move to CC at any time for $29.99/month for the first year. Paying for one SE app would be more then an entire year.
Bob

Change the Tax Code- In Sales Order i have Tax code for VAT

In Sales Order i have Tax code for VAT ( Condition type JIVP) it is reflecting "P4" instead of "A4".
Where the "P4" Tax code is picking in Sales Order.
How to change the Tax Code.
Urgent

Hi CHAKRI,
Check if the condition record is maintained with the appropriate taxclasssification.If yes, Go to sales order in change mode,then goto-header-billing-alternate taxcalssification and modify tax classification.It will pick up right tax code.
Regards
Ram Pedarla

Single Del. for multiple sales order:

Dear all,
i wanna do a single del. for multiple sales order ,So plz provide me the exact flow to do it.
Also provide what conditions are required to do the same.
Waiting for ur reply,
Thanks & Regards,
Olet malla..

Hi,
It is very much possible in SAP.
Goto the T code VL10A and enter your Shipping point and Execute.
This will give you the list of Sales orders which are ready for delivery.
Select the sales orders for which you want to create single delivery and click on "Back Ground".
This will create the delivery. PGI you can do it VL02N.
Requirement for combining Sales order are: Ship to party should be same, Route should be same, Delivery date should be same, Shipping point should be same, plant should be same.
Regards,
Mullairaja

Can system produce one single invoice for bulk of sales orders?

Hie all...
I have a few questions with regards to sales orders per Billing.
1) Can the system cater for creation of only ONE Invoice for about 8,000 sales orders in one click of VF04?
2) Is there a limit of sales order to be created in ONE Invoice? If there is, how much is the maximum limit?
3) If can, will there be any performance issue to the system? Waht are the impact that we should be aware of?
I've tested billing for lesser sales orders (execute VF04 for 5,427 s/orders only). However, the system still produce 2 Invoices and yet still has remaining 407 sales orders not processed.
i have read the discussion about Billing line item here Re: Maximum no of lines in the Invoice but the issue is still uncleared to me.
TQVM!
Haryati haron

Hie all.
My appology for the above post. I have double check the bill and found the split analysis as mentioned by G.
As this is my first time encounter the split scenario, would appreciate if anybody would share the knowledge on how to tackle my issue here. I found tHE split analysis as follows:
Split due to different header data
                                                                                Fld Name                        0300001429           0300001430
                                                                                Country of Destination          MY                   SG
Region (State, Province, Count SL                   SG
Country of Sales Tax ID Number MY                   SG
Reference Document Number       0300001429           0300001430
Payment Reference               0300001429           0300001430
1) All sales order's Sold-to-Party hardcoded to onely one customer - e.g 10919 but different Ship-to-Party
2) I assume that Country of Destn, Region and Country of Sls Tax Id data is taken from Customer master data but why does it takes Ship-to-Party customer master data? Can i change it to take Sod-to-party Master data?
3) I believe i need to change the Origin sls tax no from A (Ship-to-Part) to C (Sold-to-Party) but can anybody pls help pointing out the tcode or menu path to do so? (TQ!).
4) believe also should point #4 above be resolved, Ref Doc No. and Payment Ref No. will not be an issue anymore.
Appreciate any feedback.
TQVM!
3)

Single Invoice with reference to 2 Sales Order

Hi,
How can i make a single billing invoice no (vf01) with reference to 2 sales order?
billing plan has been maintained from each sales order,we dont have any pgi process.
so process is sales order->billing plan-> invoice
my user want to generate single invoice with reference to 2 sales order - same customer no.

For processing billing due list (VF04) - The system combines documents with the same customer number, proposal billing type and sales organization, and attempts to include them all in the same billing document. If the preconditions are met, then a single invoice is created for the deliveries and/or orders.
To do a collective billing. Collective Billing Documents
The selected documents in the billing due list are billed. The system tries to combine them as much as possible. Processing of the selected documents is carried out in the background. After processing of the documents, you return to the billing due list. The sysytem will indicate whether or not a document has been billed successfully.
If successful, then Save
You can also carry out a simulation of billing. In this case, select Simulate. The system simulates the collective billing / online function described above.
-After the collective run you can display a log for the collective run. This displays possible errors during billing.
-You can also branch to the resulting billing documents, in order to carry out a split analysis.
-The billing documents of a collective run can also be canceled.
Re: VF04
Hope it assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Using a Single Library for Entire Site and When to Use Subsites

I'm hoping a discussion I am having with my coworkers can be solved. We are trying to decide two things:
Should the entire office be under a single site or should each division have their own site? Our Office has 5 divisions that contain 17 Branches, one site for business functions and one top-level site for the entire office.
Is it standard practice to create one huge library managed by metadata or should there be multiple libraries? I tend to think one library will be too hard to manage with regard to metadata and site columns and that libraries should be based on business
functions or subject domains (i.e., SOPs, Quality Documents, Business Documents, Technical Documents, etc).
Currently, several workflows, libraries and lists have already been created under our business functions site. In order to house everything under a single site, we would need to change the name of the site and move everything under it. I'm not
sure if changing the name of the existing site will cause problems.
I group these two items together because they really seem related. With everything under a single site, individual libraries, lists and workflows could get out of hand as everyone tries to manage their own division. But then so would a single
library for everyone. The problem with more than one site is that data cannot flow freely between sites (via workflows) and search would be less effective so some are against separate sites. So knowing one question may affect the answer for the
other.
Any thoughts on our library and site structure would be appreciated. Thanks.

As always the usual SharePoint consultant cop-out answer of 'it depends' is correct.
Having said that there are certain trends that are quite relevant:
It isn't common to use a single site collection for all sites. It can be done but it often leads to a state where you have a single monstrous site collection which is harder to backup, recover and maintain (see the boundaries and limits documents). The
default behaviour in most cases is to have a central 'shared' site collection then one per <group> where Group is a team that works on the same content, has broadly the same area of interest and access. That might be one for HR, one for the Support team,
one for the Sales team etc.
In terms of libraries there's a wide variation. If there' no difference in views, security and metadata then keeping the library count down is generally a good thing. However using multiple libraries can make life easier and better for users by allowing
more useful views, more secure by locking down libraries rather than using item level permissions (always a nightmare) and allowing more useful alerts and so on.
SharePoint architecture is a science but it's a really, really hard one to formulate into If/Then rules. So, broadly answering your questions I would lean towards multiple site collections and I generally agree with you on point 2, although if there's only
a small number of documents and simple structure then a single library might still make sense.

Create a single delivery for different schedule lines in the scheduling agr

Hi
I want to create a single delivery for different line items with different delivery dates in the scheduling agreement, as Iam aware it is possible to combine different line items into one delivery through sales order.
Need your inputs
Aravind

Hi,
Try with below solution and see I am not confirm about this
VL01N >>> Menu outbound delivery >>> Deliver sales order
Here you put order number and selected date as your ANOTHER SCHEDULE LINE
Kapil

Single invoice for multiple orders with different divisions

Dear All,
while I am trying to do single invoice for muliple orders with different divisons invoice is gettting splitted..In copy control vbrk routine I tried with 003 and 007 etc..but result is same..what configuration need to be done for getting the single invoice
Thanks In advance
Regards
CNRNAIR

Hello
single invoice for multiple orders with "different divisions" invoice is getting split
FYI - Different Division means different Sales Area.
So, sales doc (whether sales order, Delivery & Billing) is applicable to EXACTLY one sales area.
Thus, combining docs with different sales area is practically impossible.
Provided, you are using common division.
Hope this assist you,
Thanks & REgards
JP

Single invoice for multiple deliveries in Export scenario

Hi All
I am trying to create a single invoice for multiple deliveries. In case of Local Sales i am able to do it.
But when it comes to export sales the system is not allowing me to create Single invoice for 2 deliveries . This is a export scenario. Can you suggest... When i am checking the split invoice log it says split due to header data "Number of foreign trade data i"
Plz suggest.
Thanks
Rishi

Thanks G. Lakshmipathi
Resolved
As per the split analysis, System was checking the number generated for Foreign Trade data at delivery level.
As told i have Tried maintaining the Indication at copy control level VTFL "Redetermination of Foreign Trade Data at Billing level".
This has resolved my Issue.
Thanks Again
Rishi

Dynamic creation of single reports for characteristic value combinations

Dear Experts,
We have a report showing the monthly sales from one reporting unit (RU) to another u2013 see example below:
RU 1, RU 2, Sales 100
RU 1, RU 3, Sales 60
RU 2, RU 1, Sales 20
RU 2, RU 3, Sales 40
There is a requirement to automatically generate single reports for each combination of RUs selling to each other and broadcast these reports automatically by mail:
Report 1:
RU 1, RU 2, Sales 100
Report 2:
RU 1, RU 3, Sales 60
Report 3:
RU 2, RU 1, Sales 20
Report 4:
RU 2, RU 3, Sales 40
Of course it would be possible to create single reports for each combination using fixed filter values. But we need a dynamic calculation because there are not always sales for each combination. Moreover this would be difficult to maintain, because each time a new reporting unit has been created, new reports have to be created as well. We are looking for a completely dynamic solution,
Maybe there is a way to solve it with the BEx Broadcaster function u201Cprecalculation of value setsu201D or u201Cburstingu201D. But we unfortunately do not have any experience with this.
Thanks a lot in advance for your help!
Best regards
Marco

Hi,
Using the bursting functionality in the broadcaster this is possible. I think you would want to send the reports from RU1 to RU2 and RU1 to RU3 to a recipient linked to RU1 or somehting. In that case you need to add an attribute email to the RU infoObject. In the bursting settings you can use that value to determine the recipient of the email. Furthermore, you can automatically split the resultset to receiving reporting unit.
If you have any specific questions regarding this subject, let me know.
Kind regards,
Alex

TAX Calculation as per child items for fininsh goods in sale bill.

hi team,
here i am implementing SAP business one in construction company :
SCENARIO:
TEMPLATE BOM= FG=ABC+D
steps:
1.sales order for FG item in which child items we are manually at row level for print layout issues.
2.Delivery challan document we are making by copy to functionality and then again selecting FG item so that
child items come again under FG at row level this we are doing so that we can decrease teh stock of chil items whihc ever is required.
3.A/R invoice we are creating in system only with FG item by deleting child item at row level due to print layout problems.
in sales invoice we are entering unit price of FG.
ISSUE ONLY ON VAT:
here in this company during creation of sales invoice WE HAVE to calculate the tax amount through system but the problem is that we have different taxt rates for different child items whihc is explained as below:
1.A(Material-aluminum)-vat@4%
2.B(material- hardware)- vat 12.5%
3.c(Material- Glass)- vat@4%
4.D(labour)- VAT not applicable only service tax 10.3% is applicable
so now my question is as follows:
1.how to calcualte the vat tax amount on invoice if child items are not present on invoice or
how to calculate the sale price( exclusive of tax) of the child item from the sale price of the FG(COMPANY is not able to bifurcate the sale price of finish goods at child items)
example:
after adding delivery we can come to know the COGS of the child items suppose
A=50
B=30
C=20
D=60
total=160
FG SALE PRICE =200 (exclusive of tax)SO Total margin is 40Rs(equivalent to 25%)
then A= 5012.5(MARGIN)=62.5 WITH VAT 4%= 62.52.5=65
B=307.5(MARGIN)=37.5 WITH VAT 12.5%= 37.54.69=42.19
C= 205(MARGIN)=25 WITH VAT 4%= 251=26
D=60+15(MARGIN)=75 with NIL VAT
FG= 62.537.525+75=200
vat on above= 2.54.691= 8.19Rs.

Hi Amit,
Ur example is practicle example by PLD or query and QPLD this is not possible to solve.
I will suggest u , through help of crystal report and developer u can get desire output for print out of sales bill
with reference of its base documents.
Regards,
Mahesh.

Pricing For Text Item in Sales Order

Hi ,
How to give price for text item in sales order.
With regards.
Afzal

Hi Afzal,
consider to create a single service material as a generic one, type DIEN, with basic data and sales org views, with item category group LEIS (it will determine item category TAX in sales order). Material description could be "Don't forget to change me!" so in sales order user remembers to changes the description according to the especific sales order requirements.
Regards,
JM

Singl GL for vat collected on Sales

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for