Site deosn't look right in third party hosting and can't publish to catalyst in muse

the muse export site looked horribly different than in muse. http://www.shopdaisygirls.com/
and this is what the site is supposed to look like, which it does in muse alone like so...
as well, I can not publish the site even to catalyst from muse as pictured above, it says there was no response from the server. Check you network connection (which is running fine) and try again. I've been trying again, alot. how do I publish correctly to the third party hosting or even to catalyst

It appears that the master css file is missing. Try this and see if it helps. Ensure you are using the latest version of muse. Under the edit menu choose preferences and switch user and sign in with your AdobeID. Re-export the html and upload it to your server.
Let me know if it helps.
J

Similar Messages

I changed web hosts and can't publish through iWeb SEO Tool or Rage Site Map Automator. Do I need to delete the old site map?

I switched to iPage hosting since Mobile Me is expiring. Also recently upgraded to OS X 10.7.3 and am using iWeb 3.0.4 for my web site design. I published directly to the FTP from iWeb but all title tags, meta tags have disappeared and I'm not showing up in Google or others. I tried publishing from iWeb SEO but it couldn't complete the process.
Should I first publish to a folder as I did before with Mobile Me, then delete all old sitemaps and start over with the Site Map Automator and then try to publish from the SEO tool? Will I lose the key words and meta tags that are already in iWeb SEO?
Thanks!

The problem is that most tech support people don't understand how iWeb structures a site.
When a visitor types in "domain-name-com" the browser expects to find an index.html in the root folder on the server. In "normal" websites the index.html file is the first page of the site.
The iWeb index.html file is a redirect to the first, or landing, page of the site which is the one at the top of the left column in iWeb just below the site name.
iWeb produces two index.html files.
One is outside of the folder containing the rest of the files and directs to - folder-name/home-page-name.html
The other one is inside the folder and directs to - home-page-name.html
You have two choices of how you upload the files since you are publishing to a local folder.
You can upload the whole folder plus the external index.html to the root folder on the server and the URL to any page will be...
http://www.domain-name.com/site-name/page-name.html
If you upload the contents of the site folder, and not the folder or the external index.html, the URL will be...
http://www.domain-name.com/page-name.html
See this page for more info and the warning about breaking the RSS feed....
http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/URLs-Favicons.html

Problems with certain text appearing once exported as HTML on my third party hosting site

Hello,
I am experiencing problems with how certain text is appearing on my website www.pplmedia.com/speakers.
Most of the text is appearing how I want it to once I have exported it out of Muse, but for a reason I can not rectify, certain text is coming out as plain Arial Black text, in a bigger font and the text boxes move slightly. If you go onto the page www.pplmedia.com/jock-wishart you will see what I mean.
I have taken the text out of Muse, put it into the program 'TextEdit', I changed the text from rich to plain, put the text back into Muse and the problem still remains.
I have also published the site as a trial in BC and the text is how it should be, so I assume this is an issue with third party hosting I am using?
If someone can get back to me to offer any help or suggestions that would be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Oliver

You are awesome!!! Thanks so much! I have talked to a ton of people this
week, and no one could figure this out. I read your email to the technical
support person at our 3rd Party Host, and she fixed some files that were not
in the correct spot and changed some of the permissions settings. I am up
and running. Thanks for making my Friday!
Re: Adobe Muse Site will not preview properly on Third Party Hosting
Site...Help!
created by adobelance <http://forums.adobe.com/people/adobelance> in Help
with using Adobe Muse - View the full discussion
<http://forums.adobe.com/message/5227992#5227992>
What's the URL for your uploaded site?
Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you
want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the
forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/5227992#5227992
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not
directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply
to this email or visit the message page:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/5227992#5227992 To unsubscribe from this
thread, please visit the message page at
http://forums.adobe.com/message/5227992#5227992. In the Actions box on the
right, click the Stop Email Notifications link. Start a new discussion in
Help with using Adobe Muse by email
<mailto:[email protected].ad
obe.com> or at Adobe Community
<http://forums.adobe.com/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&container
Type=14&container=4761> For more information about maintaining your forum
email notifications please go to
http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

Third Party Hosting Muse Site - 404 Error on Mobile

Hi guys,
I recently exported my Adobe Muse site files (pixelariumstudio.com), uploaded them into FileZilla, and then uploaded the site to GoDaddy hosting services using FileZilla.
The site looks great on desktops but I receive a 404 error whenever I try to view the site on mobile devices (even tablets). I called GoDaddy thinking it was a problem on their end but after two opinions from two separate calls, I've been informed it's the code of the site itself that is the problem. The funny thing is, when the site was hosted through Adobe, it appeared fine on mobile devices but when the site was moved over to GoDaddy, the 404 error arose.
I'm wondering if Muse writes specific code for displaying a site in mobile browsers that is not recognized by third party hosting services because GoDaddy is not redirecting the site to the mobile view and instead just coming up with a 404 error. If so, is there any way to change the code that Muse writes to display the site on mobile devices so that GoDaddy can recognize it? I've done some research online to see what basic code is used to redirect a site to the mobile view but all I came up with was:
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
Every guide I find says to place that tag right after the <head> and I do but still no luck getting the website to display on mobile devices. If anyone knows the proper coding to get GoDaddy to display a Muse site on mobile devices, I would forever be in your debt. I'm guessing it's just a couple lines I have to replace but I don't know what lines or with what to replace it. :/ Here is the entire <head> of the website in case this helps find any faulty code:
<head>
<script type="text/javascript">
   if(typeof Muse == "undefined") window.Muse = {}; window.Muse.assets = {"required":["jquery-1.8.3.min.js", "museutils.js", "jquery.musemenu.js", "webpro.js", "jquery.watch.js", "jquery.musepolyfill.bgsize.js", "musewpslideshow.js", "jquery.museoverlay.js", "touchswipe.js", "museredirect.js", "jquery.scrolleffects.js", "index.css"], "outOfDate":[]};
</script>
<script src="scripts/museredirect.js?17485671" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
   Muse.Redirect.redirect('desktop', 'tablet/index.html', 'phone/index.html', '');
</script>
<meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8"/>
<meta name="generator" content="2014.2.1.284"/>
<title>Home</title>
<link media="only screen and (max-device-width: 370px)" rel="alternate" href="http://pixelariumstudio.com/phone/index.html"/>
<link media="only screen and (max-device-width: 960px)" rel="alternate" href="http://pixelariumstudio.com/tablet/index.html"/>

<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="css/site_global.css?3995807253"/>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="css/index.css?4104780936" id="pagesheet"/>


<script type="text/javascript">
   document.documentElement.className += ' js';
var __adobewebfontsappname__ = "muse";
</script>

<script type="text/javascript">
   document.write('\x3Cscript src="' + (document.location.protocol == 'https:' ? 'https:' : 'http:') + '//webfonts.creativecloud.com/playfair-display:n4:all;ubuntu-condensed:n4:all;raleway:n3, n7,n6,n4:all.js" type="text/javascript">\x3C/script>');
</script>

    
<headHTML>
<style type="text/css">video {
        width: 100%;
.mask {
width: 100%;
height: 903px;
display: relative;
position: absolute;
overflow: hidden;
}</style>
</headHTML>
<style>
li {
letter-spacing: 2px !important;
</style>
</head>

Sounds like you haven't uploaded all the files exported by Muse.
Specifically, it looks like you didn't upload the 'phone' folder.
If you use Filezilla or another 3rd party FTP tool, you have to be sure to upload all the files exported by Muse for your site to work correctly.
You can also use the 'Upload to FTP host...' menu item within Muse to upload all the files to your web hosting provider.

If I upload a site to FTP host (third party hosting), will my client have any kind of site management options like the dashboard page on Business Catalyst?

I am creating this website for a client, and they want to be able to take it once I'm finished and manage it on their own. However, they are not Adobe users, so I am using BlueHost to host the site instead of Business Catalyst. If I do this, will there be a way that they can view analytics or have any kind of management page like the dashboard in BC? With the new update, they can now use the in-browser editing option through a third party hosting site, but they would like to have something where they can view the analytics.
I've searched and searched to find an answer to this and haven't found one. I don't want the client to spend the money on the hosting site if it is not the best option for what they want. But, since they are not Adobe users, they can't use BC, and I don't want to use one of my free BC sites.
Please help!

You would have to add analytics etc yourself likely Google Analytics. As for a Dashboard, no they won't. On a side note, the client does not have to be an Adobe User to have it hosted on BC. You can just create the site, host it on BC and simply add them as an admin. They don't have to be an Adobe user.

TS3938 When I went to the Quicken site I was routed to a third party tech company that asked me to download a software that allowed them to access my computer for a remote session to fix my computer. Is that a scam? I did not do it but how do I get my Q

When I went to the Quicken site I was routed to a third party tech company that asked me to download a software that allowed them to access my computer for a remote session to fix my computer. Is that a scam? I did not do it but how do I get my Quicken 2007 to work with Mountain Lion?

old diane wrote:
When I went to the Quicken site I was routed to a third party tech company that asked me to download a software that allowed them to access my computer for a remote session to fix my computer. Is that a scam? I did not do it but how do I get my Quicken 2007 to work with Mountain Lion?
Ahhh, I see that you did not allow them to connect (is this true)
Here is a link to the Lion/Mountain Lion compatible version of Quicken.
http://quicken.intuit.com/personal-finance-software/quicken-2007-osx-lion.jsp

Looking for a third-party affiliate program that will integrate well with Adobe Business Catalyst.

Dear Adobe Community,
I am looking for a third-party Affiliate Program that will integrate well with the Adobe Business Catalyst platform.
The requirement is fairly basic, i.e., to track multiple affiliates and down-stream affiliate-to-affiliate referrals. Also looking to report and display these referrals an affiliate’s dashboard.
We have looked into Affiliate Program Software, Affiliate Tracking Software Marketing and would like to entertain other options before making a decision.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! —Thank You!
Kind Regards,
Doug McClure

For what it is worth, I am a fan of NuGen, I have both SEQ 1 and 2 and two stereo enhancing tools (stereoizer and stereoplacer I think they're called). Since I have the SEQ 1 it replaces all Channel EQ's. And the stereotools sound great and very lush, in stead of the more usual cheezy combfilterthingies that pass for stereo enhancing tools.
And I actually like the interfaces. Simple, but stylish, functional and ergonomic (in this case meaning you can see all parameters in a quick glance, no guessing at settings).

Publishing an Adobe Muse site to a third party hosting provider?

Hi Guys,
I'm trying to find instructions as to how to go about publishing my completed Adobe Muse site which is hosted with a third party hosting company, there are videos for publishing to business catalyst alright.
Any help would be greatly appreciated...
Thanks
Have a nice Saturday :-)

I am having a problem trying to FTP my site created in Muse, too. I am using "Upload to FTP host" (Found under File) and after several tries I am still getting a different error message each time: "Error uploading (a certain file which happens to be a jpg this time!). Click Resume to try again. If this problem persists, try again later.
[426 Failure reading network stream.]."
I tried again and again and again. So I called the host company and I checked to see if am using all the correct settings that they have.They verified that I had the proper settings.
Still no success.

Name servers are not responding on third party host site

Hi I'm working on a site in muse at the moment, it has a .ie prefix (Ireland) so when I attempt to change the name server settings in the third party host to the oneworld server their system is telling me I've to ask adobe to first accept the .ie prefix.
Gary.

Hi Gary
You can add .ie domain to your site and point to BC servers , you can either use name server records or use BC IP for creating an A record.
Thanks,
Sanjit

Third party apps and peripherals to blame?

I am wondering what applications and external add-ons are working and which ones are not?
It appears to me a lot of people are having problems with external hard drives and previously installed applications.
I did a clean install and have only added Apple programs so far (iLife, iWork). I am hesitant to add any other programs for fear of messing up my install, or worse... my Macbook.
The big question is who did the research and development (lack of) on Leopard.
It is beginning to look more and more like Apple focused all it's attention on perfecting the OS and left all the responsibilities for software compatibility to the third party software developers.
Bad idea. Companies that make software for Apple computers are catering to a far smaller market than our PC brothers, which leads me to believe they do not have the resources to insure 100% compatibility. Apple should have anticipated this and performed more testing.
When I installed Roxio Toast 7 I could not burn a disk image. Shortly thereafter my superdrive stopped working completely. I found out from other posts, that you need version 8, or an older version of 7 to get it to work. On Roxio's website there is no mention of this at all. No a peep.
Apple had a few years to check compatibility and work software engineers to make sure their products worked on Leopard.
I further confirmed my suspicions when I visited the apple store today. I was there because my superdrive stopped working. After I installed Leopard and started to re-install my applications (Office, Toast), the drive quit accepting disks. They replaced the drive while I was at the store. By the way they said it was a coincidence. Mmmm.
While I waited (Fantastic customer support by the way, even on a Sunday) I noticed all the computers in the store happily running Leopard without a hitch. I looked deeper and found little or no third party software installed. External hard drives and cameras appeared to be working fine, but with no added software.
My suggestion is be real careful with what you install.
To Apple... Pleeeaaase test your products more thoroughly before sending them out the door. It may not be your responsibility, but if there are known issues then they should be disclosed.
On the other hand how sad it that... Imagine- "To install our software you must take the weekend off, back up all your data, delete all third party apps, and hope you hardware works with our new OS. Some of you will be lucky and others will not. Meeting our system requirements does not really guarantee anything... Good luck".

It seems they deleted my post from discussions. Thanks.

Third party shipment and dropship differences

Dear all,
I have several questions on the following and it is always confused me:
1 - Is there a difference btw the Third Party Shipment and the Third Party Dropship? or are they actually means the samething? if not, please tell me the differences?
2 - May I know in what step of the above two processes does the MM functional come into the picture? (i.e. what part of the above process are own by MM).
Thanks.
tuffy

Hi Tuffy,
In Third party dropship scenario, customer give an order from your e-trade site or online sales site. after receiving the order, your contracted company with you will deliver the order, not you. you are adding your profit to the list pricing. Process is going below:
customer >> shopping from you >> payment to you >> getting the amount of profit after sales >>> sending of order and delivery information about customer to contracted company >> contracted company will deliver th order to the customer.
But in other type of third part sales, we sould create purchase order additionally.
I hope these will clarfy your confussion.
Regards,

Third Party Items and Receiving Calendar

Hi Gurus,
I have a question about third-party items and receiving hours. I've searched this forum, OSS, and other sources, but I'm stumped.
First some background: our company ships product from stock and third-party items. For each customer we maintain a single unloading point, and the receiving hours for this unloading point are the days the customer is open.
For stock items, we have transportation scheduling switched on. SAP determines the delivery date for these items based on the route and the receiving calendar.
For example, assume an order is placed on Monday 9/24, we are using a 1-day route, and the customer is only open on Fridays. The system will schedule the delivery for Friday 9/28 - based on the customer's receiving calendar.
For third-party items we have a committed 1-day delivery time from our vendors. My problem is that in this case SAP does NOT consider the receiving calendar. For example, if an order is placed on Monday 9/24 and the customer is only open on Fridays, the system will schedule delivery for Tuesday 9/25.
This is a big issue for us because we drop-ship refrigerated product to the customer. If the product arrives on a day the customer isn't open, it will be damaged.
Does anyone know how to get SAP to consider the customer's receiving calendar for third-party items?
Thanks
Rick

Hi Navneetha,
Thanks for d reply.
I hv checked d mentioned tables and Itm Categories nothing is +ve there. All 3 itms hv TAS itm category. Also I agree with ur MIRO statement.
I found one thing which might b d cause plz check.
As we knw dat we cant change the schedule ln date and quantity once the Pur. Requisition created. and we cant make changes in sales order itm line if the PO is created for that Pur. Requisition. Bcoz afteward the PO wont be updating the Pur Requsition and sales order automatically.
But here the schedule line date at d schedl ln category for itm 2 is changed by a certain Batch job after the PO cration.
Therefore I think this wd b d reason that the item line 2nd is not getting updated in sales order from the PO and looks open.
The change of schedule line dates is not maintained in the PO manually ever.
So would it b d reason for the inconsistent doc flow updates and 2nd item being open as not invoiced yet?
regards,
Sandesh

What types of third party loyalty solution can SAP POS 9.5 intergrate with

What types of third party loyalty solution can SAP POS 9.5 intergrate with (reserached already Rediron, and DBS)?
Looking For Loyalty\rewards and giftcard solution. Any advice would be appreciated.

Hi Hiram,
The SAP POS Suite has solutions already in place for Loyalty - Allegiance Analytics and for Gift Card - SVA. However, there are other 3rd party options that can be incorporated into the POS as well, but you would need to contact those vendors directly.
Regards,
Mark

I renewed my subscription for a third party app and was charged TWICE! $38 bux a pop. How do I go about getting one of the charges refunded?

I renewed my subscription for a third party app and was charged TWICE! $38 bux a pop. How do I go about getting one of the charges refunded?C

You can try contacting iTunes support via this page : http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/ - click on Contact iTunes Store Support on the right-hand side of the page, then Purchases, Billing & Redemption

Fees for Third Party Hosting

Is theri an Adobe fee to export/publish a Muse designed site with a third party host?

Nope, you just don't get all the same functionality you would such as In Browser Editing, detailed site statistics, etc that are only part of BC Hosting. Also if it is only a basic site the BC hosting is free for a limited number of sites.

Site deosn't look right in third party hosting and can't publish to catalyst in muse

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for