Slow Archiving.

Hi,
I have O9i Prod & stdby DB. On Prod DB I have 9 Redo Log groups with 1 member each with 50MB each. The Stdby DB is config for Max Performance mode. Whenever there is a heavy lod on the DB than the Archiving process becomes very slow. At that time if I chk the alert log file, I see the following msg:
"ARC1: Unable to archive log 4 thread 1 sequence 9587
Log actively being archived by another process"
Following para are set on the prod DB:
-->log_archive_max_processes = 4
--> archive_lag_target = 3600
- log_archive_dest_2 service="(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS
_LIST = (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp
)(HOST=xxx.xxx.x.xx)(PORT=1521
)))(CONNECT_DATA=(SID=xx)(OR
ACLE_HOME=/oracle/ora9/OraHome
)(SERVER=DEDICATED)))", ARCH S
YNC NOAFFIRM delay=180 OPTIONA
L max_failure=0 reopen=300
Please advice.
Also pls let me know that in the max perf mode for stby db:
1) does Arch process creates the Arch log files 1st on the Prim & then on the Stdby & after that it creates the next Archive log
or
2)does the Arch process creates the Arch log files simultaneously on both DB & after that it creates the next Archive log
or
3) 1st Arch process creates the Arch log files the Prim & then creates the next Archive log on Prim independent of the Archive log copy on the Stdby
Thank You.

Hi
I guess the "slow archiving" under hevy load is because You have many log switch with full checkpoints. So You should change from 50MB to biggest the redolog file" size, eg 100MB or bigger.
If there are 2 archive destination and You have 2 archive processes then the archiving will be "parallel".
lajos

Similar Messages

  • Will SSD speed up iDVD

    Hi,
    have a nice MacPro 2010 4core 12gig with fast boot and user drives and two slow archive drives.
    Am pretty disappointed with how long my iDVD takes to make either a TS_Folder or a Disc Image from my projects.
    Would getting an SSD Drive to boot & run iLife on Speed things up?
    If so, by how much? If it's just a few percent I'll shrug and live with it, but shaving even 25% off a 4hr encode is still a full hour!
    Activity monitor shows app fluctuates between 100 and 200% during most of the encodes.
    Getting impression From the dramatic fluctuations in percentages that the CPUs are getting starved by a bottle neck at the hard drive level.
    Richard in Michigan

    No

  • Archiver Import & Indexing is running very slow

    Dear All,
    We have OracleTextSearch search engine configured for Metadata only indexing. The server specs for application and database machines are way high & underutilized.
    FileStoreProvider is used to store content in WEBLESS mode on a filesystem.
    Our Archiver Exports are quite fast but Imports are pathetically slow. We suspect that the Indexing is the culprit.
    Indexer is configured for 25 items per batch, 1000 items per checkpoint.
    What various factors do you think can slow down the Indexer?
    We have several content stuck in GENWWW due to an earlier bug in DIS Outlook integration. Could those be an issue and is there a way to move them to released state.
    Regards,
    Prateek

    Hi Prateek,
    I'm a bit confused with this statement "We have OracleTextSearch search engine configured for Metadata only indexing."  OracleTextSearch is a full text indexer.  How would you configure OTS itself as "metadata only" indexing?  I would think that instead of using OTS, it would be more efficient to set the SearchIndexerEngine to "DATABASE.METADATA".  Maybe this is the case already, but I'm just puzzled by the statement.
    Indexing just metadata, though, should not be that performance intensive.  There are a couple of things that jump out.
    - File system access with regards to read/write.  Even though you are using a webless state for STORAGE, the actual files being indexed would have to be resident on the file system during the indexing operation (unless the process has changed, which I don't think is the case, as the items are not indexed directly within the database itself.  This would be true even though it's meta-only. It's just the way the product is written as I recall).  You then would be subject to any other file system limitations, such as sufficient space, virus scanning, etc.  Keep in mind that a txt file with the index value gets written, and this txt file is processed in the index insert/update operation.  Slow writes/reads of this file would affect the process. 
    I point out the file system since the observation was made that the system is relatively underutilized.  I've seen many high-end processor/memory configurations get sabotaged with slow disk/SAN/NAS access.
    - Database access/performance.  If searches are slow in addition to the indexing being slow, I'd think you'd be well served by looking at the database for some maintenance operation, like recomputing statistics, rebuilding indexes, etc.

  • Archive and install slowing down?

    When I installed Leopard I chose Archive and install after two failed Updates with BSOD, now it's working fine but sometimes I think it's not as fast and responsive as it should be.
    Could archive and install be slowing it down?
    Thanks

    If you have a spare external hard drive you can copy the old system folder to it (or burn it to DVD) and then toss it, though I doubt it has anything to do with the old system.
    Check "Activity Monitor" to see if there are any applications that are using a large amount of CPU time or percentage. Sometimes various applications will take off on using the CPU (the Finder has done it once or twice for me) and need to be relaunched.

  • Archiving old mail - as mail is running very slow

    Can someone please give me some guidance as to how to archive my older emails in Mail? I have to keep a copy of everything but some of my inbox's have 20,000+ emails in them and this is making Mail run very slow. I would love to be able to select for example a date criteria and export or archive everything prior to that date. Any ideas? Also, am i right in assuming this will make Mail run faster for me? The slowness occurs usually when switching between mail boxes within the application. Thanks in advance, John

    Hi David,
    Thanks for your reply. I downloaded VacuumMail and ran it successfully, it seemed to have worked yesterday but again today opening my inbox is very slow loading again.
    I have now created a new white folder called Archive and moved 15,000 of my incoming messages into a sub folder within there and have done the same with 10,000 of my sent messages into a 'sent' sub folder of the white folder. This leaves me with around 8,000 in my inbox and 5,000 in my sent folder. Is this the reason that my mail is still opening these folders very slowly, because of the large volume of mail? I guess i must see the little clock icon to the right of the inbox for about 15-25 seconds each time before the mail is displayed in my inbox folder...
    Are there any other diagnostics i should run?
    Finally, thanks to everyone who has posted in this forum. I have been trying to hit the 'helpful' button for each of you but there seems to be a bug with this as i get the following message each time:
    Error
    +An error in the system has occurred. Please contact the system administrator if the problem persists.+
    +Useful links :+
    +* Forum Home -- browse the forums here.+
    +* Search Forums -- visit the search page to query all forum content.+
    I will keep trying though, and if in the meantime anyone has any other ideas as to how to help please let me know.
    Thanks in advance
    J.

  • Flash Archive (flarcreate) Painfully Slow

    I really like the concept of flar, but flarcreate is just painfully slow.
    To the point that I don't want to use it. I could do L0 backups to
    tape significantly faster than flash archives. I'm popping off
    a flarcreate on my Sun Blade 100 before I do an OE upgrade
    and after 2 hours it's still determining the size of the archive.
    I'll be the first to complain about the speed of Sun Blade 100's,
    particularly for IO, but this is just crazy.
    Is there any expectation that a better/faster way is going to be made
    avalible? I really would much rather use flar than tape.
    Thanks.

    That is painfully slow! The longest I've seen the size estimation take is around 10-20 minutes. It's been a while since I've done it though & that was on a 100 as well. I didn't have anything else running on the machine, and it was a base install + patch cluster, with compression my flar archive came out to be about 500 megs. It definately took under 2 hours to create the archive [start to finish]. Maybe you should try this on a different machine & see if it goes faster, or maybe even restart the process.
    Now that I'm thinking about it, there was one time where the flar create was actually including the archive files into the archive, such that the archive was 2x-3x it's normal size. The problem was, it was one of the last files to be added to the archive & by then it was a pretty large file. You might want to make sure you're excluding the directory that you're saving the archive to...
    HTH,
    Daryl

  • IBook G4 slowing down -- Archive & Install question

    Hello,
    I have an iBook G4, that I bought I believe back in late 2004. It's been slowing down quite a bit and I'm thinking about performing an Archive & Install, which a guy at the Genius Bar recommended would make my performance much quicker and less spinning beachballs.
    I have an Airport, through which I access my internet wirelessly, and printer wirelessly. After performing an Archive & Install, will I need to re-setup my wireless internet and ability to print wirelessly? It's been a long time since I set these up the first time, and kind of dread relearning the process.
    Thanks,
    Ben

    You could try booting into Safe Mode. This will take quite awhile longer than a normal startup because it does a file check and repair of the hard disk.
    You will see your normal desktop. Once completely started up in Safe Mode, restart normally, and go to Applications > Utilities > Disk Utility. Click on the top hard drive icon in the left sidebar and note the S.M.A.R.T. status at the bottom right of the pane. What does it say?
    Select the named boot volume in the left sidebar ("Macintosh HD" unless you've renamed it). What is the hard drive capacity and how much space remains available on it? Repair permissions on it.
    See if a little hard drive maintenance helps things out.
    (In the future, you may want to post in the iBook G4 Forum. You have posted in the iBook G3 (Dual USB) Forum.)

  • Goldengate Extracts reads slow during Table Data Archiving and Index Rebuilding Operations.

    We have configured OGG on a  near-DR server. The extracts are configured to work in ALO Mode.
    During the day, extracts work as expected and are in sync. But during any dialy maintenance task, the extracts starts lagging, and read the same archives very slow.
    This usually happens during Table Data Archiving (DELETE from prod tables, INSERT into history tables) and during Index Rebuilding on those tables.
    Points to be noted:
    1) The Tables on which Archiving is done and whose Indexes are rebuilt are not captured by GoldenGate Extract.
    2) The extracts are configured to capture DML opeartions. Only INSERT and UPDATE operations are captured, DELETES are ignored by the extracts. Also DDL extraction is not configured.
    3) There is no connection to PROD or DR Database
    4) System functions normally all the time, but just during table data archiving and index rebuild it starts lagging.
    Q 1. As mentioned above, even though the tables are not a part of capture, the extracts lags ? What are the possible reasons for the lag ?
    Q 2. I understand that Index Rebuild is a DDL operation, then too it induces a lag into the system. how ?
    Q 3. We have been trying to find a way to overcome the lag, which ideally shouldn't have arised. Is there any extract parameter or some work around for this situation ?

    Hi Nick.W,
    The amount of redo logs generated is huge. Approximately 200-250 GB in 45-60 minutes.
    I agree that the extract has to parse the extra object-id's. During the day, there is a redo switch every 2-3 minutes. The source is a 3-Node RAC. So approximately, 80-90 archives generated in an hour.
    The reason to mention this was, that while reading these archives also, the extract would be parsing extra Object ID's, as we are capturing data only for 3 tables. The effect of parsing extract object id's should have been seen during the day also. The reason being archive size is same, amount of data is same, the number of records to be scanned is same.
    The extract slows down and read at half the speed. If normally it would take 45-50 secs to read an archive log of normal day functioning, then it would take approx 90-100 secs to read the archives of the mentioned activities.
    Regarding the 3rd point,
    a. The extract is a classic extract, the archived logs are on local file system. No ASM, NO SAN/NAS.
    b. We have added  "TRANLOGOPTIONS BUFSIZE" parameter in our extract. We'll update as soon as we see any kind of improvements.

  • Macbook running very slow after Archive & Install

    Hey everyone, I needed to reinstall my OS the other day so I used archive and install because I needed to save Ableton Live files. My problem is that now the computer runs horribly slow. Any application I open takes about 20 seconds to load and I get the rainbow 'wait' wheel constantly. I am hoping all I need to do is repair my permissions but i would like some better advice
    Thanks.

    theworkplace:
    How much free disk capacity do you have? You need to maintain a minimum of 15% of total disk capacity as contiguous free space. Check to be sure that everything is in place, then delete the Previous Systems Folder. That should instantly free up a bunch of space.
    cornelius

  • Over the years and upgrading machines, I now have over 20k of emails in the import mailboxes within several folders. How can I archive these in way so the are still available, if necessary, to search, but don't load and slow down my mail app.

    Over the years and upgrading machines, I now have over 20k of emails in the import mailboxes within several folders. How can I archive these in way so the are still available, if necessary, to search, but don't load and slow down my mail app.

    Ok Thank you.
    I wont worry now.
    Just maybe dig in deep and delete the deleted mails that are still around and that will hopefully clean it up a bit.
    Many thanks for your help and advice.
    Regards
    Chrispl0

  • Time Capsule Archive very slow... or stuck

    I put my TC to archive yesterday to a USB 2T iomega drive... all initial steps went well but later on the next day the TC is still with an amber light and nothing has happened, is this normal, should it take so long... I had about 450 GB of information in the TC so I don't know it this is a lot or not.
    Also, is there anyway to know the progress of this archive?
    thank you,
    eric

    Nope that is not normal.
    The SOLID AMBER light means that the operating system on the TC is loading... so it's not actually even running when you see that.
    Try again - and when you start the Time Machine backup - you should have the time machine indicator up on the finder bar is OSX that spins when it is backing up - click on that - it will give you a real-time progress of the backup.

  • Workbench is too slow and creating an archive in Workbench takes an eternity

    Creating an archive in Workbench is taking too long.
    Creating an archive for 1 four page document is taking 15 minutes and 15 seconds to prepare then another 9 minutes to create the 150K archive file.
    We are experiencing this constantly and we need to figure out why. Are there configuration settings that can be made to correct this situation. We are running workbench in Citrix. Are there known issues about running workbench in Citrix.

    How big is your 4-page document source file?
    I had an issue recently where one of my .process files grew to 34MB. There was a bug where it just kept inserting blank lines into one of the xml tags every time I saved it. But because it was constant, it compressed down in the archive quite well.
    Rename the .LCA file to .ZIP, open it and see how big the files are in there. If there is one huge file, you might want to try copying the offending file to a new file in Workbench, delete the old one and see if that reduces the size.

  • IWeb Archive slow to load in browser

    My readers have complained that it takes a long time to access my iWeb archive when they click on the Archive button. Some of them use Safari, others IE on Windows.
    Anyone know how to improve the loading time? My pages have at least one photo each but that should not affect the loading time of the archive right since only the first few lines of text are displayed.

    You must be talking about the main blog summary page...the one that has a preview photo and a little excerpt of text. The real Archive page that lists all of your entries only has text...no images and only the titles of your entries.
    With regard to you blog summary page, there is not a whole lot of control you have. Make sure that you haven't placed a really large (in file size) image in the header. If you adjust the number of entries shown, you can cut down on the load time as well. Usually, people don't have more than 5-10 entries shown on the main blog summary page. The rest of the entries fall off to the Archive page.
    You can adjust the number of entries shown by opening the Inspector and clicking on the RSS tab. You can adjust the number of entries as well as the amount of preview text.

  • The "Edit Undo" command is extremely slow, taking 10-15 seconds to undo an archive or deleted message. Is this typical?

    Everything in Thunderbird seems to be operating fine. I'm very happy with the performance, EXCEPT: The "Edit > Undo" command takes a very long time to take effect. If I accidentally archive a message I want back in my inbox, and hit "ctl Z", it takes a good 10-15 seconds for the message to return to my inbox. Is this typical?

    Oops!
    Just saw that I hadn't updated my hardware profile, so I just did.

  • Slow to wake up; "Welcome" screen after archive & install

    Thanks for the ongoing help. This board has been a lifesaver many times.
    I've had numerous problems with my Rev. B iMac that usually require DiskWarrior to fix. It gets worse every time.
    Anytime it shuts down unexpectedly, either because of a power outage or force shutdown, the files are so scrambled that it never gets past the gray screen without the fans running and then shutting down. I have to boot up in target disk mode and fix it with DW from my G3 iMac.
    The problems start when I try to open a file or program immediately (less than five minutes) after it wakes up; I get the spinning beach ball for at least ten minutes, and then the computer seems to catch up.
    This latest time, though, the files were so screwed that it gave me the "Welcome" screen and wants me to set the computer up from the beginning. I can tell that my files are still there when I boot up in target disk mode, but if I go through with the setup, will they be erased, and what's causing all these problems to begin with? The hardware test didn't show any problems, and both my RAM sticks appear to be OK.
    Thanks again for any help.
    G5 iMac 2.0 G   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   1 G additional RAM

    Power outages can cause disk corruption just like a forced shutdown. With a UPS, you can eliminate the frustrations associated with a power loss. Get one.
    Even though it passed the hardware test, I would still say that it sounds like a hard drive problem. Take the time to run the extended test and see what it finds.
    If it still finds nothing, then I would try creating a new user account. There is no reason that starting up from sleep should give you any problems at all, but by creating a new user account, you can eliminate some possibilities like corrupted plist files and such.
    Take a look at Dr. Smoke's <a href"http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/faqs.html"A>FAQs and see if you can find anything that works there.
    If you create that new account and there are no further problems, I would either keep using that or do an archive and install of the OS.

Maybe you are looking for