Smb server for multiple interfaces

I have IFS 1.2 installed on a Linux box running RedHat 7.1. There are two ethernet cards in the box. By default, when iFS is started, it grabs both interfaces and uses their port 139. Is there a way to make it only use one of them? I configured lisener to listen on one specific ip instead of hostname, and I was able to make the Oracle 9i to listen to just that ip, but could not make the iFS to do so. Any suggestions?
If there is no way around, has anyone tried to mount iFS via NFS to a directory and then use samba server (from www.samba.org) to share that directory? Is iFS utilities (check in/out, versioning, etc.) working in this kind of setting?

I had a NT Box with two cards and wcp was not working as a parameter in server configuration ServerIp was set to the second ip address which i did not use , So i had to manually change the ip address for wcp to use. I stopped wcp server changed the parameter
WCP.IpAddress as documented in setup and administration guide and unloaded and reloaded the server and it seemed to work.
Also Check the ipAddress parameter which SMB is using OEM and see if its using the right
ipAddress.
I have not tried on Linux though

Similar Messages

  • 2K8 - Best practice for setting the DNS server list on a DC/DNS server for an interface

    We have been referencing the article 
    "DNS: DNS servers on <adapter name> should include their own IP addresses on their interface lists of DNS servers"
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd378900%28WS.10%29.aspx but there are some parts that are a bit confusing.  In particular is this statement
    "The inclusion of its own IP address in the list of DNS servers improves performance and increases availability of DNS servers. However, if the DNS server is also a domain
    controller and it points only to itself for name resolution, it can become an island and fail to replicate with other domain controllers. For this reason, use caution when configuring the loopback address on an adapter if the server is also a domain controller.
    The loopback address should be configured only as a secondary or tertiary DNS server on a domain controller.”
    The paragraph switches from using the term "its own IP address" to "loopback" address.  This is confusing becasuse technically they are not the same.  Loppback addresses are 127.0.0.1 through 127.255.255.255. The resolution section then
    goes on and adds the "loopback address" 127.0.0.1 to the list of DNS servers for each interface.
    In the past we always setup DCs to use their own IP address as the primary DNS server, not 127.0.0.1.  Based on my experience and reading the article I am under the impression we could use the following setup.
    Primary DNS:  Locally assigned IP of the DC (i.e. 192.168.1.5)
    Secondary DNS: The assigned IP of another DC (i.e. 192.168.1.6)
    Tertiary DNS:  127.0.0.1
    I guess the secondary and tertiary addresses could be swapped based on the article.  Is there a document that provides clearer guidance on how to setup the DNS server list properly on Windows 2008 R2 DC/DNS servers?  I have seen some other discussions
    that talk about the pros and cons of using another DC/DNS as the Primary.  MS should have clear guidance on this somewhere.

    Actually, my suggestion, which seems to be the mostly agreed method, is:
    Primary DNS:  Locally assigned IP of the DC (i.e. 192.168.1.5)
    Secondary DNS: The assigned IP of another DC (i.e. 192.168.1.6)
    Tertiary DNS:  empty
    The tertiary more than likely won't be hit, (besides it being superfluous and the list will reset back to the first one) due to the client side resolver algorithm time out process, as I mentioned earlier. Here's a full explanation on how
    it works and why:
    This article discusses:
    WINS NetBIOS, Browser Service, Disabling NetBIOS, & Direct Hosted SMB (DirectSMB).
    The DNS Client Side Resolver algorithm.
    If one DC or DNS goes down, does a client logon to another DC?
    DNS Forwarders Algorithm and multiple DNS addresses (if you've configured more than one forwarders)
    Client side resolution process chart
    http://msmvps.com/blogs/acefekay/archive/2009/11/29/dns-wins-netbios-amp-the-client-side-resolver-browser-service-disabling-netbios-direct-hosted-smb-directsmb-if-one-dc-is-down-does-a-client-
    logon-to-another-dc-and-dns-forwarders-algorithm.aspx
    DNS
    Client side resolver service
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc779517.aspx 
    The DNS Client Service Does Not Revert to Using the First Server in the List in Windows XP
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/320760
    Ace Fekay
    MVP, MCT, MCITP EA, MCTS Windows 2008 & Exchange 2007 & Exchange 2010, Exchange 2010 Enterprise Administrator, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
    Microsoft Certified Trainer
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
    Complete List of Technical Blogs: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/technicalblogs.php
    This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
    I agree with this proposed solution as well:
    Primary DNS:  Locally assigned IP of the DC (i.e. 192.168.1.5)
    Secondary DNS: The assigned IP of another DC (i.e. 192.168.1.6)
    Tertiary DNS:  empty
    One thing to note, in this configuration the Best Practice Analyzer will throw the error:
    The network adapter Local Area Connection 2 does not list the loopback IP address as a DNS server, or it is configured as the first entry.
    Even if you add the loopback address as a Tertiary DNS address the error will still appear. The only way I've seen this error eliminated is to add the loopback address as the second entry in DNS, so:
    Primary DNS:  The assigned IP of another DC (i.e. 192.168.1.6)
    Secondary DNS: 127.0.0.1
    Tertiary DNS:  empty
    I'm not comfortable not having the local DC/DNS address listed so I'm going with the solution Ace offers.
    Opinion?

  • Using a Single HTTP Server for Multiple APEX Instances

    Our company's DBA Manager has asked if it would be possible to externalize the HTTP server portion of APEX from the DB Servers. In other words, he would strongly prefer that the DB Servers *only* run Oracle Database software.
    We know that we can install the HTTP server on another box but, in thinking about how to do this, we were wondering if it is really necessary to create a separate HTTP server installation for each APEX instance. What we'd really like to do is have one HTTP server for all our our Dev boxes and several (but, not one to one) for each of our upper environments; staging, qa, prod, etc.
    Right now, each instance have a single dads.conf file on each DB box. So, if we we're to attempt to consolidate them, we'd need some way to embed multiple dads files and to associate each instance with the correct one.
    Has anyone ever done this or (preferably) have some examples?
    Thanks,
    -Joe

    Joe,
    I don´t know a specific reference for it, I remembered it because when I was looking the documentation on the site, I saw the reference "Support for multiple database connections" in the URL: APEX Listener New Features 2.0&lt;/title&gt;&lt;meta name=&quot;Title&quot; content=&quot;APEX Listener New Features 2.0…
    I´ve tried to use APEX listener some time ago, but in a earlier version together with glassfish. So, since for me was only one database, I created the necessary amount of DAD´s on my database, each one for a specific port.
    Check the link and you´ll see the same information I saw.
    Thanks.
    José Valdézio
    "Neo, everything that Oracle told me, became true, except extinguish bugs in a first release."

  • Single SOAP receiver adapter for multiple interfaces

    Hi,
    I have to send multiple interfaces like Vendor, Customer, Material to one receiver.
    I want to configure only one communication channel (receiver SOAP adapter) to send all these interfaces. Is this possible?
    Currently I am provided with different URLs from the receiver system as below.
    http://host:port/Services/Vendor.wsdl
    http://host:port/Services/customer.wsdl
    http://host:port/ServicesMaterial.wsdl
    I will be having 3 Sender agreement, 3 receiver determination, 3 interface determination and 3 Receiver agreement.
    I want only one SOAP reciever adapter which goes inside all the above 3 Receiver agreement.
    So When I give the target url as http://host:port/Services, the messages fail.
    But When I specify the full targert url in the adapter as http://host:port/Services/Vendor.wsdl then it works.
    Which means I would have to create as many communication channel as interfaces.
    Is there a work around for this?

    hi kantheri,
       For this, we have to fill the TargetURL and the SOAPAction in Receiver Communication channel dynamically.
    So, we need to write UDF in Message Mappings using DynamicConfiguration to fill the TargetURL and the SOAPAction Dynamically.
    DynamicConfigurationKey keyURL = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","THeaderSOAPACTION");
    DynamicConfigurationKey targetURL=DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","TServerLocation");
    // access dynamic configuration
    DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration) container
    .getTransformationParameters()
    .get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
    conf.put(keyURL,"Soap action");
    conf.put(targetURL,"target url");
    return "";
    In this UDF, we are filling the TargetURL in u201CTServerLocationu201D message attribute and SOAPAction in u201CTHeaderSOAPActionu201D message attribute.
    So, whenever we execute this corresponding operation these values will be filled in receiver communication channel at runtime.
    TargetURL- Give some dummy URL or http:// 
    SOAPAction - *
    regards,
    ganesh.

  • Generic HTTP URL For Multiple Interfaces

    Hi All,
    Please suggest on the following requirement. I am using PI 7.31 Single stack (Java only version).
    There are multiple HTTP to Proxy interfaces and each interface has different source structure.
    The requirement is --- How to utilize a single HTTP URL for all the interfaces.
    The major challenge is the source structure for all the interfaces is different.
    Kindly Suggest....
    Regards,
    Nitin...

    Hi Nitin,
    One solution is to create one sender interface (with either multiple operation of each interface or having all structure in different node and optional occurrence), then use operation specific mapping.
    refer the below example for multiple operation scenario
    Setup Multiple Operations Scenario in ESR and ID
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90dcc6f4-0829-2d10-b0b2-c892473f1571?overridelayout=t…
    regards,
    Harish

  • Remote Desktop Licensing Server for multiple deployments

    Hi all. I'm towards a project of implementing 4 deployments of RDS in branch offices and 1 in head office. Those tend to be VMs on Server 2012 R2. 
    I've began collecting info from technet and even found that great post: 
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/yungchou/archive/2010/01/04/remote-desktop-services-rds-architecture-explained.aspx
     but I still can't figure out if I'm to use separate licensing server for all deployments or there is a possibility to use a single one for 5?

    If all machines are in the same domain a single license server will be fine. you will just need to add the licence server to your individual deployments via server manager. We have a single license server for 2003TS, 2012RDS 2012citrix VDI and 2008 Citrix
    XenApp

  • One TREX server for multiple Portals?

    I have the same requirement as that contained in this thread:
    TRex for Multiple Portals
    I wonder if anyone can technically elaborate a bit what the procedure for this configuration.
    I would have to install a TREX and create a TREX instance for each Portal that I want to give TREX service?
    Each instance points to a different host?
    My requirement is to use the same TREX to both DEV and QA Portal hosts.
    Any suggestions would be appreciated. !!
    regards,
    Leandro.

    Hi Leandro,
    For your requirement this document describes the TREX installation -
    [TREX with Multiple Instances|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/78df2a46-0a01-0010-ef81-a6be60cc5cfd]
    Hope this helps,
    Reward points if helpful
    Regards,
    Shailesh Nagar

  • Journal data --- for multiple interfaces

    hi,
    i have a source table.
    i want to capture the journal data on this table.And use the data stored in the "jv$ tables" in multiple interfaces.
    The multiple interfaces have same source table and are linked in a package.
    Is it possible to achive it.

    Yes.
    Just have one extend window / lock subscriber at the start of the package, run all the interfaces you want to on that Change data before finishing the package with a Unlock Subscriber / Purge Journal step.

  • PortForwarding to start a Game Server for Multiple...

    Hello, I am new please don't be harsh.
    I got my Homehub, then a BT Infinity (Thing) a few months after.
    Please keep in mind; I know nothing on what to do. Just a faint Idea.
    I need to know how to actually portforward. 
    Any aditional information that you need, Just ask..
    The game(s) (Probably not important) that I will be running a server for:
    Team Fortress 2
    Minecraft
    Thanks!

    You need to open ports for different games. 
    Follow these steps to port forward minecraft
    1. Go to 192.168.1.254
    2. You may be asked to Enter a default password, follow the on-screen steps once completed come back here.
    3. Click on "Settings" in the blue bar at the top
    4. Enter the password you just created if prompted
    5. Click on "Advanced Settings"
    6. Click on "Continue to Adavanced Settings"
    7. Now click on "Port Forwarding"
    8. Click on "Supported Applications"
    9. Click on the button "Add new game or application"
    10. Give it a suitable name, I suggest "Minecraft"
    11. Copy an existing game/application: Put no
    12. Now under "Protocol" select TCP
    13. In the 4 Fields to the right of TCP you just selected put this number in "25565"
    14. Now Click on "Add"
    15. Select UDP now under the Protocol list
    16. Put the number in again "25565"
    17. Click "Add" once more!
    18. Finally, click "Apply"
    19. Click on "Configuration"
    20. From the list select name you called it, in this case "Minecraft"
    21. Now select the device you wish to broadcast the Minecraft server from
    22. Click on "Add"
    23. Finally click "Apply"
    Just google Team Fortress 2 port forward home hub 3 or something for the ports for the game.
    If this helped you please click the Star beside my name.
    If this answered your question please click "Mark as Accepted Solution" below.

  • Mac OS X 10.5 Server: Preventing DDNS registration for multiple interfaces

    Please see http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3169 regarding a method to prevent OS X from registering all of its NICs IP addresses to the Active Directory to which it is bound's DNS.
    This is the default and expected behavior and is actually quite helpful on machines with a single NIC.
    However it is fatal on servers with more than one NIC as it breaks all sorts of things!
    The problem I am having is that apples fix as linked does not work. I have applied this two both my Xserves running OS X 10.5.x Server (currently 10.5.6 Server) and I still see the automatic registration of both NICs IP addresses to the AD DNS. I am a little unconvinced that SAMBA is the root cause as my logs cheerfully report directory services is successfully registering the IPs to the Active Directory.
    Windows at least allows you to turn of this feature per NIC, Id settle for turning it off entirely and manualy adding Arecords to the AD DNS as at the moment this is killing me.
    What am I doing wrong. i have actualy rebuilt one of my servers from scratch to see if I can fix this to no avail.
    In short, help!

    I contacted Apple and they provided me a workaround:
    You have to manually add the DNS entries once you have followed the steps.
    1. In Terminal, we need to make a backup of the file /usr/bin/net which we will be replacing:
    sudo mv /usr/bin/net /usr/bin/oldnet
    2. Place the following in a shell script at /usr/bin/net and chmod its permissions to make it executable. The script will prevent the name registration and allow other net commands to succeed.
    #!/bin/sh
    if [ "$4" == "ads" -a "$5" == "dns" -a "$6" == "register" ]; then
    exit 0
    else
    /usr/bin/oldnet "$@"
    fi

  • One Open Directory server for multiple businesses?

    Hi all,
    Is it possible to have one Mac OS X server seen by client computers through different domain names?
    See, I have one server now, with name:
    server01.it.lan
    As we are managing three different companies, I'd like the users working for one particular company to see the server with that company's name:
    server01.bizA.lan
    or
    server01.bizB.lan
    ...and so on.
    And I'd want whatever service used by that user to have a path or address that refers to that name, even though it will point to the same server in the end...
    After some reading, I have different avenues available which would each require quite some reading. So I'm turning to you to narrow the field of researches.
    1. First of all, is this possible? I mean, not-too-complicated possible?
    2. Where would you recommend I spend time learning?
    - DNS aliases? AFP seems to go back to the primary name when I use an alias in Directory Access... (shows server01.it.lan/share instead of server01.bizA.lan/share)
    - Network configuration duplicates, to have more than one IP address pointing to the same machine?
    - Other ideas? I don't need/want a full walkthrough. Actually, I'd prefer to just have simple hints to direct my researches...
    Thanks,
    Fred

    Hi Leandro,
    For your requirement this document describes the TREX installation -
    [TREX with Multiple Instances|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/78df2a46-0a01-0010-ef81-a6be60cc5cfd]
    Hope this helps,
    Reward points if helpful
    Regards,
    Shailesh Nagar

  • Configuring IISExpress as default web server for multiple TFS workspaces in VS2013

    I am trying to configure VS2013 so that IISExpress works in a similar way to the builtin web server (Cassini) in VS2010.
    For the past year or so, I have worked with multiple local TFS workspaces for a web site which all map the same TFS branch. When running the web site, the solution sets a default port which is used if I only have one VS 2010 instance in use. If I use multiple
    instances, a new random port is assigned, but the instance works fine and I can debug both sessions without problem.
    Having installed VS2013, the 'internal' web server is no longer provided, so I have to use IISExpress. I cannot figure out how to configure this to work the same way as the server in VS2010.
    As far a I can tell, IISExpress always uses the workspace folders on the first site specified in the applicationhost.config file. If I create a second site, it seems to be ignored and the second instance uses the files in the first set of folders!
    Reading elsewhere, it seems it might be possible to get IISExpress to use a second workspace folder by editing the config file every time, but (a) this is tedious and (b) something, probably IISExpress, rewrites the file at various times, so it's not clear
    whether changes would persist. 
    I can't believe I'm the only developer using VS2013 who regularly will be working on a new feature for a website and want to bring up a second instance of in using either a workspace which does not have the changes made in the first or even another site
    with a different set of changes and have them run smoothly in parallel! VS2010's internal web server just worked!

    Hi Derek Dongray,
    You are posting on Visual Studio Setup forum which talks about Visual Studio installation problems. If you need to know how to set your IISExpress, please post on this forum instead:
    http://forums.iis.net/
    Regards,
    Barry Wang
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Storing SessionManager or Server for multiple web applications

    We currently have one enterprise application with 2 web applications installed. These 2 web applications must share the same session cache.
    Toplink is installed as a shared library for both of these web applications.
    What I am wondering is how Server and SessionManager should be utilized.
    In our servlet initialization of web application one we get an instance of the SessionManager and assign the SessionManager to a static instance variable.
    static SessionManager sessionManager;
    sessionManager = SessionManager.getManager();
    Now whenever we want to get a client session from either web application we make the call
    Server serverSession = (Server) sessionManager.getSession("XXX");
    From looking at the code for the sessionManager.getSession("XXX") I see that this
    results in a synchronized method invocation which is in turn bottlenecking our database access code.
    My question is should we not just be storing the Server in a static instance variable to distribute client sessions to both web applications and not the SessionManager.

    Hi,
    One SSA is ok, but you should think about access rights. If the access is clear cut between all the web apps you should be ok with one SSA. Multiple result sources limiting on content source also works, but could easily be bypassed.
    Multiple SSA's will eat up RAM/CPU like a mother :)
    As for popular etc.. it could be due to how those sources are set up, but haven't investigated or tested this much.
    Thanks,
    Mikael
    Search Enthusiast - SharePoint MVP/MCT/MCPD - If you find an answer useful, please up-vote it.
    http://techmikael.blogspot.com/
    Author of Working with FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint

  • How do I set access to the same network share on a Windows server for multiple users on an iMac (school set-up) in Lion 10.7.3?

    We've got them authenticating/binding with AD (after hours of troubleshooting to get working), and their Home drive on the Windows 2003 server loads in the dock, but they also want to be able to load the same network shares on the server e.g. "Students$" for every student that logs onto the iMac.  I realise without Lion server we can't control it by group, but if we could at least set it up consistently for the students that would be a great start.
    Thanks.

    When you install you get the opportunity to install it for "All Users".
    It sounds like you have a demo version on your Mac however, you need to delete it:
    http://www.freeforum101.com/iworktipsntrick/viewtopic.php?t=105&mforum=iworktips ntrick
    Peter

  • How complicated is it to implement Robohelp Server for multiple authors?

    I am presently the lone techical writer in my company and I use Robohelp HTML V8 to generate WebHelp for our software. The RH software has been upgraded from an original V5 Robohelp full license, to a V7 upgrade and then a V8 upgrade.
    I am investigating the use of Robohelp Server to open the possibility of adding another author, and would like to know how complicated it is. Do we still need to buy two seat licenses for Robohelp V9 as well as Robohelp Server V9, or are they included with the Server license?  Also, are there any concerns for upgrading V8 project to V9? 
    If this information is already covered somewhere in the forums, please feel free to point me in that direction. I have not been able to find it myself. Thanks in advance!  

    Hi Sheryl
    Indeed what you likely want is some form of source control. And certainly, splitting the project up and making different folks "captain of their own ship", is one way to roll.
    But it sounds like you may have either misunderstood or had the RoboSource control misconfigured. With any source control system, the way it usually works is by storing all the content on the server in the source control database. But for each client connecting to the database, you establish what is called a "Working Folder". And that is usually on each local PC. When you check files out, they are copied to the working folder. So you work locally, but the application handles copying them back and forth to and from the server as you work. That way, you shouldn't be seeing performance issues.
    Cheers... Rick
    Helpful and Handy Links
    RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
    Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7, 8 or 9 within the day!
    Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
    SorcerStone Blog
    RoboHelp eBooks

Maybe you are looking for