Soft_val method of ofgtel65.pll differs

Hi,
We have migrated from Oracle 9i to 10g and
In 'OAS904' ,
we used ofgtel65.pll ,this pll uses cg_ref_codes to retrieve the meaning for the dynamic LOV .
During migration , we have changed the pll files,
In that ofgtel65.pll uses qms_ref_codes instead of cg_ref_codes to retrieve the meaning for the dynamic LOV .So we are not able to retrieve the data.
am using wrong pll file?
what to do for thia?
please provide me the suggestions or soluntions.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Tharini.

We also did a migration of 9i to 10g and we have both the qms_ref_codes and the cg_ref_codes. The qms_ref_codes is inside the headstart scheme and the cg_ref_codes is inside the application scheme of the database. Our ofgtel65.pll makes usage of the qms_ref_codes but our forms make use of the cg_ref_codes. We didn't change anything to the ofgtel65.pll and for us everything works fine.
The qms_ref_codes and cg_ref_codes are the same kind of tables, so you could think of making a synonym from the cg_ref_codes to the qms_ref_codes table.

Similar Messages

Ofgtel65.pll , CGDV$REF_CODES.SOFT_VAL problem after migrating to 10g

Hi,
We have migrated from Oracle 9i to 10g and
In 'OAS904' , i have used CGDV$REF_CODES.SOFT_VAL to populate a field with a meaning via a dynamic list in one of the FORM and if I query the form by giving a value and press F12,all fields are populating , its working fine but the same thing is not working after migrating the FORMS application to 'OAS10.1.2'. If I query the form by giving a value and press F12,its showing error like "FRM:40201 Field must be entered" for that particular field because that field is not populated and also a required field in the form.
Actually , this form is generated by designer.If i open the form using forms builder, i can see the auto generated code like 'POST-QUERY', in that CGDV$REF_CODES.SOFT_VAL is used to retrieve the meaning.
Note : ofgtel65.pll points to QMS_REF_CODES instead of CG_REF_CODES.
Am using headstart6.5.4.0 .
The generated form having post_query with the following code
CGDV$REF_CODES.SOFT_VAL(P_VALUE=>curr_value, P_MEANING=>l_meaning, P_DOMAIN=>l_domain, P_VAL_CODE=>TRUE);
But in the ofgtel65.pll ,
the soft_val method will have a query that refers to QMS_REF_CODES .But my meanings are present in CG_REF_CODES.
Any help would be of great help. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Tharini.
Edited by: tharini on Aug 4, 2010 10:30 PM

Is this a Designer generated Form ? You may want to ask the question on that Forum too.

Overloading methods that do logically different things, does this break any major principles?

This is something that's been bugging me for a bit now. In some cases you see code that is a series of overloads, but when you look at the actual implementation you realize they do logically different things. However writing them as overloads allows the caller
to ignore this and get the same end result. But would it be more sound to name the methods more explicitly then to write them as overloads?
public void LoadWords(string filePath)
var lines = File.ReadAllLines(filePath).ToList();
LoadWords(lines);
public void LoadWords(IEnumerable<string> words)
// loads words into a List<string> based on some filters
Would these methods better serve future developers to be named as LoadWordsFromFile() and LoadWordsFromEnumerable()?
It seems unnecessary to me, but if that is better what programming principle would apply here?
On the flip side it'd make it so you didn't need to read the signatures to see exactly how you can load the words, which as Uncle Bob says would be a double take. But in general is this type of overloading to be avoided then?

Hi PandoraElite,
>>Would these methods better serve future developers to be named as LoadWordsFromFile() and LoadWordsFromEnumerable()? It seems unnecessary to me, but if that is better what programming principle would apply here?
I think you could define a class with many complex behavior, and the behavior has the same method name with different parameters like below:
//difine the class
public class LoadClass
public void LoadWords(string filePath)
//add method
MessageBox.Show("string");
public void LoadWords(IEnumerable<string> words)
// loads words into a List<string> based on some filters
MessageBox.Show("IEnumerable<string> words");
//use the class
string str = "hello";
List<string> list = new List<string> { "h","e","l","l"};
TestClass.LoadClass loadclass = new TestClass.LoadClass();
loadclass.LoadWords(str);
loadclass.LoadWords(list);
>>On the flip side it'd make it so you didn't need to read the signatures to see exactly how you can load the words, which as Uncle Bob says would be a double take. But in general is this type of overloading to be avoided then?
I think it would be better not to use the “LoadWords(lines)” in the “public void LoadWords(string filePath)”. When you modify the “LoadWords(IEnumerable<string> words”, it would affect the “LoadWords(lines)” method and the function of the “LoadWords(lines)”method
might be effected.
Best Regards,
Edward
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click HERE to participate the survey.

WSDL for web method with parameters from different namespaces

I'm trying to create a web service that exposes a method that accepts a JAXB XML object and a timestamp as parameters and returns another JAXB XML object. I've tried to follow the contract-first method by creating the schema and WSDLs first. I've created the schemas for the XML and deployed them on a web server and I've written the following WSDL:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<wsdl:definitions xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
     xmlns:tns="http://bar.org"
     xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
     xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" name="MyWebService"
     xmlns:ns0="http://foo.org/Transaction"
     xmlns:ns1="http://bar.org/TransactionResponse"
     targetNamespace="http://bar.org">
     
     <wsdl:types>
          <xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://bar.org"
              xmlns:ns0="http://foo.org/Transaction"
              xmlns:ns1="http://bar.org/TransactionResponse"
              xmlns="http://bar.org">
               <xsd:import namespace="http://foo.org/Transaction" schemaLocation="http://myHost/schemas/Transaction.xsd"/>
               <xsd:import namespace="http://bar.org/TransactionResponse" schemaLocation="http://myHost/schemas/TransactionResponse.xsd"/>
               <xsd:element name="ProcessTransactionRequest">
                   <xsd:complexType>
                       <xsd:sequence>
                           <xsd:element ref="ns0:Transaction"/>
                           <xsd:element name="TransactionTime" type="xsd:dateTime"/>
                       </xsd:sequence>
                   </xsd:complexType>
               </xsd:element>
          </xsd:schema>
     </wsdl:types>
     
     <wsdl:message name="ProcessTransactionRequest">
          <wsdl:part element="tns:ProcessTransactionRequest" name="parameters" />
     </wsdl:message>
     <wsdl:message name="ProcessTransactionResponse">
          <wsdl:part element="ns1:TransactionResponse" name="parameters" />
     </wsdl:message>
     
     <wsdl:portType name="MyWebServicePortType">
          <wsdl:operation name="ProcessTransaction">
               <wsdl:input message="tns:ProcessTransactionRequest" />
               <wsdl:output message="tns:ProcessTransactionResponse" />
          </wsdl:operation>
     </wsdl:portType>
     
     <wsdl:binding name="MyWebServiceSOAP" type="tns:MyWebServicePortType">
          <soap:binding style="document"
               transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" />
          <wsdl:operation name="ProcessTransaction">
               <soap:operation soapAction=""/>
               <wsdl:input>
                    <soap:body use="literal"/>
               </wsdl:input>
               <wsdl:output>
                    <soap:body use="literal"/>
               </wsdl:output>
          </wsdl:operation>
     </wsdl:binding>
     
     <wsdl:service name="MyWebService">
          <wsdl:port binding="tns:MyWebServiceSOAP" name="MyWebServiceSOAP">
               <soap:address location="http://www.example.org/"/>
          </wsdl:port>
     </wsdl:service>
</wsdl:definitions>However when I run the WsImport tool bundled with JAX-WS RI 2.1.1, I get the following interface:
public interface MyWebServicePortType {
     * @param parameters
     * @return
     *     returns org.bar.transactionresponse.TransactionResponse
    @WebMethod(operationName = "ProcessTransaction")
    @WebResult(name = "TransactionResponse", targetNamespace = "http://bar.org/TransactionResponse", partName = "parameters")
    public TransactionResponse processTransaction(
        @WebParam(name = "ProcessTransactionRequest", targetNamespace = "http://bar.org", partName = "parameters")
        ProcessTransactionRequest parameters);
}Which is workable, but I was wondering how to modify the WSDL to get a web method signature similar to:
public TransactionResponse processTransaction(
        @WebParam(name = "Transaction", targetNamespace = "http://foo.org/Transaction", partName = "transaction")
        Transaction transaction,
        @WebParam(name = "TransactionTime", targetNamespace = "http://bar.org", partName = "transactionTime")
        XMLGregorianCalendar transactionTime);With two parameters in the parameter list instead of one. Is there a way to do this?

Try changing the <xsd:element name="ProcessTransactionRequest"> element name to: <xsd:element name="ProcessTransaction"> and update the reference to it in the <wsdl:message name="ProcessTransactionRequest"> message.
In order to use wrapper style, your WSDL needs to have the following characteristics:
1) The operation's input and output messages (if present) each contain a single part
2) The input message part refers to a global element declaration whose localname is equal to the operation name
3) The output message refers to a global element declaration
4) The elements referred to by the input and output message parts (henceforth referred to as wrapper elements) are both complex types defined using the xsd:sequence compositor
5 The wrapper elements only contain child elements, they must not contain other structures such as wildcards...

Abstract method which when implemented will have different parameters

Hello to all,
I have an assignment but not looking for someone to do it for me. I am only searching for a suggestion on how to do the following.
Imagine having an application that needs to provide an estimate of the rent for different buildings.
Basically I start with by having a class name Building. This class has an abstract method called estimateRent.
I then create two classes that extend the class Building which are named Apartment and House. Both need to have the method estimateRent.
However the problem is that the rent for the Apartment is calculated on the nights passed in the flat and the people in it, while the rent for the House is just calculated on a month bases.
This means the estimateRent method requires to have different parameters depending if it is implemented inside the Apartment class or the House class.
Now I only know of two options.
The first option is to not declare the estimateRent method as an abstract method inside the Building class and just implemented inside the Apartment and House with different parameters. I do not like this option since in the future if a new Building comes in then I would like to impose the fact that that object needs to have a calculate method.
The second option is to make the estimateRent method as abstract inside the Building class however takes a parameter of either a String array or else a Map. Then the estimateRent within the Apartment class would search for the elements tagged as nights and people, and the House class would only search for the elements tagged as months!
However do not know if there are any other, better ways on how to do this. I am using Java 1.4 however if you only have answers for Java 5.0 then please post them again since I always like to learn something new :)
Thank You for any comments.
tx

The implementation changes, yes.Yes that I could understand in the Strategy Pattern (in the document I read it was being compared with the Template Pattern).
Then you need to refactor your design.I tought about that, however if you read my first post you will notice that I have different criteria on which the costs need to be estimated. While the costs for a flat are estimated on the people staying in and nights slept there, the costs for the house are based only on the months stayed there regardless of the people living in. Now for me I feel that it is bad programming practice to create one method that can have all the parameters required for any scenario. I mean the following is NOT something I am going to do:
estimateCosts(int nights, int people, int months ... etc);
That's not a very elegant way of going about it.
What is the "Context" going to have?Yep I agree, but so far my limited brain has only come up with that! I am open to any other sugestion! always if i understand it first!
Basically the Context would better be named as Criteria and it would be an interface as follows:
interface Criteria{}
Then I would create two classes that implement the Criteria object as follows:
class AppartmentCriteria implements Criteria{
public Result estimateCosts(int nights, int people);
class HouseCriteria implements Criteria{
public Result estimateCosts(int months);
Now when I recieve the inputs, depending on the scenario the Criteria is typecasted and the correct parameters passed and we recieve the Result.
I feel the above sucks since I am not seeing it as an object oriented way of doing this out! Is there any other sugestions! The refactoring thing I am intrested in! however really I can not see how such a call to that method could be refectored!
Thank You,
tx.
PS: Sun has blocked my other account as well, and this time they did not even send me an email to confirm that I was registered successfuully :( Is there someone I can contact on this? I guess next time I will reply with tx53m :)

After release 4.11 library OFGTEL differs from OFGTEL65

Hi,
After an update of Designer to release 4.11 (coming from release 2) I have troubles generating a form. I found the exact same problem in this forum (see OFGTEL65 problem however the solution provided by Lauri (Boyd, i presume) cannot be applicable.
She suggests to replace the OFGTEL65.pll by the OFGTEL.pll, delivered by the new release 4.11
However, this means that all the headstart customizations, that can be found in the original OFGTEL65.pll are lost!!!!! Can the working of headstart still be guaranteed then?
What to do? Are there new OFG* libraries patched by Headstart, which I missed?
With regards,
William de Ronde

Open the PLL file and change any extra arguments to be optional, that is, set their default value = NULL. You must not change the order of the arguments, and the NULL arguments must be at the end of the list (all mandatory arguments comes first). After that recompile all PLL and FMB that depends on this PLL.

RE-POST: different request, same method

Hi:
Sorry, I have to re-post as Anamitra acquired my thread. :)
I have a strange requirement.
It is to expose a session bean method that could take different xml inputs.
For example:
TestBean exposes testMethod(String xmlstr)
xmlstr could be of schema xmlSchema1.xsd
or xmlstr could be of schema xmlSchema2.xsd
In future it could also represent xmlSchema3.xsd... and so on.
What is the right approach in this scenario?
I was thinking to create a different web service for different xsd.
Say, webservice1 imports xmlSchema1.xsd, webservice2 imports
xmlSchema2.xsd...
Unfortunately due to some design restrictions, I cannot create different
methods in my session bean like testMethod1, testMethod2....
Is there any other better way to do this in one web service?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
/k

Bruce,
Thanks for your response.
If I use attachments, how do I represent the attachment content in the WSDL?
As I mentioned earlier, my requirement is to associate the requests against
more than one some schema definition.
/k
"Bruce Stephens" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Hello,
Why not just send your data using attachments instead of creating
multiple methods.
http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/webserv/implement.html#1072763
HTHs,
Bruce
Karthik V wrote:
Hi:
Sorry, I have to re-post as Anamitra acquired my thread. :)
I have a strange requirement.
It is to expose a session bean method that could take different xml
inputs.
>>
For example:
TestBean exposes testMethod(String xmlstr)
xmlstr could be of schema xmlSchema1.xsd
or xmlstr could be of schema xmlSchema2.xsd
In future it could also represent xmlSchema3.xsd... and so on.
What is the right approach in this scenario?
I was thinking to create a different web service for different xsd.
Say, webservice1 imports xmlSchema1.xsd, webservice2 imports
xmlSchema2.xsd...
Unfortunately due to some design restrictions, I cannot create different
methods in my session bean like testMethod1, testMethod2....
Is there any other better way to do this in one web service?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
/k

Pass a method as an object to DocumentListener

So far, I have been assigning document listeners to JTextfields within the same class as the JTextField, as in...
               private createJTextField(){
                   JTextField t = new JTextField();
                   t.getDocument().addDocumentListener(documentListener());
               private DocumentListener documentListener() {
              DocumentListener listener = new DocumentListener(){
                  public void changedUpdate(DocumentEvent e){textFieldActions();}
              public void removeUpdate(DocumentEvent e){textFieldActions();}
                     public void insertUpdate(DocumentEvent e){textFieldActions();};};
             return listener;
            private void textFieldActions() {
              //Do something, like search the text in the JTextField for a string;
              }This does work, but it means I have to include similar blocks of code for every JTextField I create.
...so, I thought it would be better to set up a utility that I could pass the JTextField and method to, which would assign the method to the DocumentListener. Something like...
     private JTextField t;
     private Boolean b;
     private JTextFieldDocumentListenerUtility l;
     protected void setUp(){
          t = new JTextField();
          b = false;
          l = new JTextFieldDocumentListenerUtility();
     public void testDocumentListener(){
          assertFalse(b);
          l.assignAction(t, someAction());
          t.setText("bogus");
          assertTrue(b);
     private void someAction() {
          b = true;
               }The JTextFieldDocumentListenerUtility class includes the "private DocumentListener documentListener()" method in the first block of code.
However, I can't pass the method "as is". I think (and I need some guidance here) its because the method "someAction()" returns a void, whereas I need to pass an object to the JTextFieldDocumentListenerUtility.
What is the tidiest way to do this, given that I'm trying to cut down duplicate code every time I create a JTextField?
Can someone please walk me through this?

You could use the Strategy pattern.
Basically creating a DocumentListener implementation that accepts as parameters the JTextField and a separate "Operation" instance. Where operation would be an
interface that would define a single operation() method (or 3 different operation methods if you want different operations performed for the changed/remove/insert events).
Some non-tested sample code.
public class MyListener implements DocumentListener {
    private JTextField field;
    private Operation operation;
    public MyListener(JTextField field, Operation operation) {
        this.field = field;
        this.operation = operation;
    public void changedUpdate(DocumentEvent e) { operation.changed(field); }
    public void removeUpdate(DocumentEvent e) { operation.remove(field); }
    public void insertUpdate(DocumentEvent e) { operation.insert(field); }
}This way if you have 10 textfields that need to behave in a similar way, you'd need only create 1 Operation implementation that handles the functionality and just use
t.getDocument().addDocumentListener(new MyListener(t, new MyStandardOperation()));Since you can't pass around only methods, you need to have a class to contain them in.
But if you need to have several textfields that have similar functionality, you'll have the functionality contained in a single place and cut down on the boilerplate code.

Payment through F-58, but different Account IDs need to assign how?

Hi
How to make vendor payment through different Account IDs of the same House Bank?
When I am using F-58 T.code for making vendor payment. But only 2 Bank accounts only possible to take.
Payment method, Currency, House Bank will be the same but 22 types of Account IDs are there.
So, when I am assigning them in FBZP> Bank Account determination, the system is not accepting.
What is the solution for this.
Waiting for earliest solution
Regards
CHINNU

Dear All
Did you get any solution for this.
Client wants to make payment daily from many bank accounts from same house bank. For this F-58 T.Code is using.
But here, Same house bank, Same payment method, Same currency but, different account IDs.
Waiting for earliest reply.
Regards
CHINNU

Handling deletions from vo via service method - how?

If you create a hyperlink to delete a row (from a grid), i.e.
    <a href="MyPage.do?event=RemoveNew&Arg0=<c:out value='${Row.rowKeyStr}' />">Remove</a>
What do you do with this Row Key String? I'm reluctant to use a value (such as a PK ID#) as I like the transparency of the key string, and wouldn't really want the user issuing a URL and just changing the pk value and removing something else.
So, do I:
a) pass this rowKeyString to the service method, which I can't see how I can even look up anything in an appmodule based on a rowkeystring, I really need a oracle.jbo.Key, but creating a Key from a string is deprecated
public void onRemoveNew( DataActionContext ctx )
       log.info(userName(ctx) + "onRemoveNew **** - START");
       try
          // grab rowKeyStr from from end hyperlink (Arg0)
          String strRowKey = ctx.getHttpServletRequest().getParameter("Arg0");
          AppModule am = getAppModule(ctx);
          am.removeRowbyRowKeyStr( strRowKey );
       catch ( JboException jex )
         au.logException( jex, log );
         throw jex;
       log.info(userName(ctx) + "onRemoveNew **** - END");
    } // onRemoveNewthe backend service method "stub" for now:
public void removeRowbyRowKeyStr( String rowKeyStr )
    log.info(userName(ctx) + "removeRowbyRowKeyStr**** - START");
    // Since no navigation took place on front end, first let's find this row
    // what do I do with this rowKeyString
    // deprecated:    Key k = new Key( rowKeyStr );
    ViewObject vo = findMyViewObject();
    try
         Key k = new Key ( rowKeyStr, vo.getKeyAttributeDefs() );
         // proceed from here...
    catch ( Exception ex )
          au.logException( ex, log );
    log.info(userName(ctx) + "removeRowbyRowKeyStr**** - END");
} // removeRowbyRowKeyStrb) issue the setcurrentrow in the front-end to get to the correct grid row, grab the pk column# of this row, then call the service method
c) something altogether different than these ideas that escapes me right now, but is the preferred/best practice
Thanks!

You can use JboUtil.getRowFromKey(RowSetIterator rsi, String skey) to do the job.
You can pass any ViewObject, RowSet, or RowSetIterator to the first argument, and your string key to the second argument.
Out of curiosity, it's source code looks like this:
   static public Row getRowFromKey(RowSetIterator rsi, String sKey)
      Key key;
      try
         key = new Key(sKey, rsi.getRowSet().getViewObject().getKeyAttributeDefs());
      catch (Exception ex)
         ex.printStackTrace();
         return null;
      Row rows[] = rsi.findByKey(key,1);
      if (rows.length <= 0)
         return null;
      return rows[0];
   }

PaintComponent: inner class / method?

Hi,
I am doing a lot of painting in my paintComponent method and would like to ask whether it's possible to use e.g. inner classes or methods within paintComponent? I think I am confronted with the problem that my paintComponent method gets too unstructured :-/
Thanks for your help!

I am doing a lot of painting in my paintComponent
method and would like to ask whether it's possible to
use e.g. inner classes or methods within
paintComponent? I think I am confronted with the
problem that my paintComponent method gets too
unstructured :-/paintComponent is a method... so, you can call other methods from it. I'm not sure what you mean by "use inner classes". You can define an inner class and instantiate an object of that class from within paintComponent just like you can from any other method. Your question seems a bit weird, or I'm not understanding it.
Is your paintComponent too slow or just too long? By all means, use methods to logically separate different things you are doing, but this only add organization, not speed.

Non-static method/object cannot be referenced from a static context...?????

What does this mean. I know about static, but I don't understand why I get this so many times.
I try to do something pretty normal and this is what I get a lot of times. I mean: the main() method should be static right? Then what good is the main() method if you cannot let it do stuff for you like this:
public class Test extends JFrame
    public Test
        setSize( 100, 100 );
        show();
public static main( String args[] )
    Test window = new Test();
    draw();
public void draw()
    blablabla whatever I want to do, a lot of times I can't.....
}Why is this, what is the reason for Java to forbid this and what can I do about it?

Your draw() method, since it isn't defined as static is considered by Java to be part of your Test object; hence, it can only be invoked in the context of an existing instance of your object. In other words, any Java program that wanted to use your draw() method would have to create an instance of your Test class using something likemyTest = new Test()Your main method, however, is something different. Since you want to execute your class as a program, the Java run-time environment needs to have standard starting point. This starting point is the main method. The problem is that the main method must be static, because the run-time environment cannot be expected to know beforehand the correct way to create an instance of your class so that non-static methods can be invoked. The drawback is that your main method can only directly access methods that are defined as static.
There are two possible solutions to this problem, and which of the two you want to use depends on the object-oriented nature of your program.
On the one hand, if your draw() method is closely tied to the object itself, if the draw() method is actually drawing your object or a part of it, it should be left as an instance method, and you should simpy use the instance of the object you created in your main method:public static main( String args[] )
    Test window = new Test();
    // maybe some code to generate something to draw???
    window.draw();
}This is what I think you are trying to do.
On the other hand, if your draw() method was some kind of universal method that didn't depend in any way on the current configuration of your instance, you could simply define draw() as static at which point your main method (or a method in an external class) could invoke it directly, without a corresponding instance. But if you did that, the draw() method itself would only be able to access static variables and methods.
Doug

Dump while running in FG mode at different places

We are running a Z transaction which is related to some trading of shares.
It is handling huge data.
when run in fore ground, its throwing dump at different places each time, its run.
For ex: CL_OS_CA_COMMON->Method SM_UPDATE_SUBSCRIPTIONS
In a different run, it failed at class CA_COL_POSITION_TRQ -> Method MAP_LOAD_FROM_DATABASE_GUID.
But the reason it states in both the cases is Maximum permitted time is reached.
We tried to improve the performance of the program technically and still getting dump.
So we want to post a message to SAP. For this, I need to know the module am dealing with. How Do I find that exactly.
As I was extracting my main data from table FMFINCODE, I thought its FUND MANAGEMENT.
Please help me in both the cases.
I also want to know, if a class is released for customer re-use or not?
Thanks
Kiran

Hi Rob,
Do you mean to say, SAP doesnt support custom transactions?
I did try se30 but I tried to reduce to the extent I could.
Any thoughts on the last question? If a class is for Customer re-use.
Thanks
Kiran

EFT Payment Method

Hello Experts,
Are EFT/ACH/Transfer one and the same payment method or are they different.
All answers would be duly rewarded with points.
Thanks,
Nandita

Hi Nandita,
they all means the same.
from a purely sap perspective, the only difference between one payment method to another is the payment medium attatched to the payment method.
Hope this helps

One Payment method, one house bank but Multiple Account ID

Hello
My client has one house bank but multiple accounts(Account IDs). They would like to have one payment method "C" - Cheque.
Is it possible to have one payment method, one House bank and multiple account ids and during F110 the program should post to the correct gl (Bank account)
Thank You

Hi,
For a combination of House bank, payment method and currency key, only one account ID with sub GL account can be maintained in SAP.
If there are different account IDs in the same House bank, the accounts should be either in different currencies (INR, USR, GBP .....) or the payment method should be different.
If all the accounts in a bank are to have same payment method and same currency, different house banks have to be created for each of the accounts.

Soft_val method of ofgtel65.pll differs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for