Solaris 10 x86 won't boot.

Hello,
I just installed Solaris 10 x86 on a brandnew disk, but the system will not boot. After generating lots of errors, it flips back to Grub. I managed to catch some error messages:
Tue Oct 14 00:13:57 WEST 2008
Oct 14 00:07:09 schille gda: [ID 107833 kern.notice]      Requested Block 4637010, Error Block: 4637025
Oct 14 00:07:09 schille gda: [ID 107833 kern.notice]      Sense Key: ICRC error during UDMA
Oct 14 00:07:09 schille gda: [ID 107833 kern.notice]      Vendor 'Gen-ATA ' error code: 0x16
Oct 14 00:07:09 schille gda: [ID 107833 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci@0,0/pci-ide@f,1/ide@0/cmdk@0,0 (Disk0):
Oct 14 00:07:09 schille      Error for command 'read sector'     Error Level: Retryable
These errors are repeated many times, for many different disk blocks.
Funny thing is, my old disk had the same problem, therefore I just bought this brandnew disk. It is a WD Model : WDC WD1600AAJB-00PVA0, Revision : 00.07H00.
I 'm not using this disk within a serial ATA configuration.
Since the Award Phoenix BIOS version is quite old (2003), I am beginning to suspect the problem might be there.
Does this look familiar to anyone?
I 'll look forward to your comments.
Thanks, Bram

Just for the record: The problem is solved.
I went on looking for more info on this message:
Oct 14 00:07:09 schille gda: [ID 107833 kern.notice] Sense Key: ICRC error during UDMAAnd then found an interesting post from 2004 by Juergen Keil:
The "bad block detected" message appears to be an old/obsolete error
message text, somewhere in the Solaris "ata" driver.
The ATA-1 standard (1997?) defined the 0x80 bit in the IDE
controller's error register as "bad block detected". (See page 32 on
<URL:http://www.t13.org/project/d0791r4c-ATA-1.pdf>)
The 0x80 bit seems to be "reserved" (undefined, not used any more)
with ATA-2 and ATA-3.
ATA-4 and newer now defines this bit 0x80 as ICRC "interface CRC error
has occurred during an Ultra DMA data transfer" when using ultra dma
transfers. (see the description of the "READ DMA" or "WRITE DMA"
command in <URL:http://www.t13.org/project/d1153r18-ATA-ATAPI-4.pdf>).
The Solaris ata driver seems to interpret the 0x80 bit according to
the old / obsolete 1997 ATA-1 standard.
So the "bad block detected" message seems to be a hint that some sort
of data corruption is happening on the IDE interface during UDMA data
transfers with the HDD. With UDMA capable disks it apparently does
not mean "the disk drive is dying".
I went to search what could cause a hardware datacorruption on my system and found that my internal removeable disktray was making bad contact.
After replacement everything worked as expected.

Similar Messages

  • Solaris 10 won't boot after changing the CPU

    Hi. I was running Solaris on my Intel-based desktop machine. It was running fine. One day I upgraded my CPU and since then Solaris won't start. Immediately after it tries to load itself, it displays something on the screen really fast ( something with "dumping" in it) and then reboots.
    I runned Solaris in fail safe but I cannot run reboot -r for example. It says that reboot has wrong parameter or something. And I don't know what else to do.
    Please help.
    Thanks.
    P.S. I'm not 100% sure that the problem is related to changing the CPU. Maybe I configured something wrong when working in Solaris prior to the hardware change. But I think that's unlikely because I'm usually pay attention when changing settings in Solaris and don't dive in dark waters.

    Right after I wrote my previous post I looked again at the web page Darren recommended and I figured out what it was all about. I had troubles understanding the procedure in the first place because I wasn't familiar with mounting partitions and I didn't know what /a refers to. On another site I found out about the command that saved me: mount /dev/dsk/c0d0s0 /a A bit later I found out that when starting Solaris in single user mode (failsafe for example) the partition is mounted automatically to /a when you choose to update the boot archives.
    (As a tip for beginners like me, once in single user mode use the Delete key instead of Backspace :P ).
    So, the procedure explained on that site is:
    In case of a hardware mismatch, use one of the two methods that follow:
    Method 1 (Recommended)
    1.Move path_to_inst          ex: # mv /a/etc/path_to_inst /a/etc/ORIGINAL_PATH_TO_INST      2.Remove all old device links          ex: # rm /a/dev/rdsk/c* ; rm /a/dev/dsk/c* ; rm /a/dev/rmt/*   3. Rebuild path_to_inst and devices          ex: # devfsadm -r /a -p /a/etc/path_to_inst Note: If you are worried about the bootblock being corrupt, reinstall it.       # cd /a/usr/platform/`uname -i`/lib/fs/ufs
          # /a/usr/sbin/installboot bootblk /dev/rdsk/<c#t#d#s0>  4.Unmount the root slice and reboot          ex: # umount /a ; init 6Method 2
    From the OK> prompt, do a 'boot -ar'.
    Accept the default for all questions except the path_to_inst file.
    When you get to that one, specify /dev/null.
    It should then prompt you if you want to create a new /etc/path_to_inst file from scratch. Say yes.
    So I tried method 1, but no success. First of all I noticed that the devfsadm command didn't create the /a/etc/path_to_inst file. As many times I have tried it (even after I read a lot more on the Internet regarding these commands) I never made it to work. Somewhere on the net somebody asked about the "-p" argument that is not explained in the man pages of the command and the answer was that it specifies the path to the path_to_inst file wich makes sense but doesn't work. Somewhere else it was suggested that the "-p" argument to be ignored and the new path_to_inst file to be looked under /etc ; this was not the case for me.
    I tried method 1 many times with small variations, within the virtual or the real machine, but it never worked.
    So I tried method 2 as well, but no luck either. First of all, for all other beginners facing this kind of problem, on a x86 machine there is no OK> prompt; it's a SPARC "feature". But "boot -r" commands or alike can be issued using "reboot -- -r".
    So I have tried all the variations I could find on the internet -r,-a,-ra,-rav, but this command didn't work either. I always got the message
    bootadm: Cannot update menu. Cannot reboot with requested arguments.I never quite figured what "menu" is all about. My guess was that it refered to the grub menu/commands for booting and that it couldn't change those. So I
    read on the net a few things about the booting commands in GRUB bootloader and I tried a few variation but they never worked. Indeed the changes I did to the commands were not saved, as the bootadm erros would indicate. Am I wrong?
    After reading about the GRUB commands I got a little bit more familiar to what goes on at booting time and later I found an article in the Sun Documentation called x86: How to Boot the Failsafe Archive to Forcibly Update a Corrupt Boot Archive ( http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2379/6n4m1vlfi?a=view ). There I so this command
    To forcibly update the corrupt boot archive, type:
         # bootadm update-archive -f -R /a
    Unmount the device.
         # umount /a
    Reboot the system.
         # init 6I have tried it, looked like it is searching through the hard-disk, after a while finished and I rebooted but with no effect.
    This is where I am now.
    Any idea of why devfsadm would not create the path_to_inst file?
    Any ideas of what to do else or where I could have got it wrong?
    Thank you.

  • Solaris x86: How to boot from Veritas mirror disk?

    Hello team,
    We are using trailware Veritas Storage Foundation (VxVM) on Solaris 10 x86 system and need help in booting from alternative boot disk(Mirror disk).
    Steps did :
    1. Mirrored the root disk group using veritas volume manager command *"vxrootmir"*
    2. Updated the bootpath with mirror disk path in /boot/solaris/bootenv.rc
    Updated the EEPROM information:
    # bootadm update-archive -R /a
    3. Edited the grub configuration file, /boot/grub/menu.lst
    Created the following entry similar to primary disk entry to allow the root disk mirror to be booted
    title Oracle Solaris 10 8/11 s10x_u10wos_17b X86 <VxVM: Alternate Boot Disk>
    findroot (rootfs0,0,a)
    kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot
    module /platform/i86pc/boot_archive
    4. reboot -- -r
    At the time of boot, selected the newly added entry from the grub list and got the following error,
    *"Reboot and select proper boot device or insert boot media in selected device and press a key".*
    I am unable to move further from here, is this because of the veritas trial version we are using ?
    Please help in resolving this issue and also explain the step by step process of booting from alternative boot disk on a x86 machine.
    Let me know if you find anything inappropriate. Looking forward for your replies.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi--
    I have not seen this message before but a quick google search says that is pretty common and is related to the system
    trying to boot from a different device (not the one you intended). Can you check your BIOS settings and possibly remove
    devices from the boot order setting... Otherwise, I would suggest running installgrub on the disk that you are trying to boot
    from.
    I'm curious why you are trying Veritas. Is there a Veritas feature that you need? You might consider trying ZFS if you haven't
    already. Its very simple to set up and use.
    Thanks, Cindy

  • Solaris 10 won't boot:(

    I am running Solaris 10.
    I get the following mesage after reboot "Select (b)oot or (i) interpreter:" Neither option allows me to boot successfully.What should I do? Is there an emergency repair utility that will fix boot problems?

    Which Solaris version, what hardware and most important: whats happening exactly? Do you get any specific errors ?

  • Solaris 10 won't boot up "Cannot load drivers for /pci@400.....

    This is the error message that I am getting on a Solaris 10 sparc server
    scsi: no major number
    cannot load drivers for /pci@400.....
    Can't load the root filesystem
    Type 'go' to resume
    {0} ok
    Is there a way for me to correct this issue. It looks like I am missing a scsi driver to boot up the server? Is there a way to boot into single user mode, mount the filesystem and rediscover the hardware, etc.....

    First i guess you have to verify that you can find the disks with a probe-scsi-all
    next you can boot it of a CD-rom/dvd into single-user:
    boot cdrom -s
    .. or similar into single-user from a jumpstart image:
    boot net -s
    Then you can mount the root disk under something such as:
    /mnt
    and rebuild the config with:
    devfsadm -R /mnt
    be careful if you have a mirrored filesystem though, you don't want to update just one of the mirrors without first breaking the mirror..
    .7/M.

  • New X2270 won't boot OpenSolaris 2009-06 from internal disk

    Is anyone having any problems with recent X2270 servers? I took delivery of two of these last week. They are without the ILOM card because Sun are having quality issues with them - a firmware bug I believe. They are fun to install as my only eyes is via a serial port that seems to have some kind of bios video text to serial ascii emulation which has quite a delay on it.
    Basically after installing Solaris it won't boot from the internal disk. So far I've tried net installs of SXCE b105 and also the latest OpenSolaris 2009-06 and in both cases the install completes correctly without any errors (that I've detected) but after rebooting they fail to load the kernel. Here is what's left on my serial console:
    Press F2 to run Setup (CTRL+E on Remote Keyboard)
    Press F12 if you want to boot from the network (CTRL+N on Remote Keyboard)At this point the hard drive activity light flashes twice and then the machine appears frozen. The Solaris banner is never shown. I've left it like this for hours just be sure.
    I've chosen ZFS for the whole disk in both instances. I wonder if this has something to do with it.
    Presumably OpenSolaris has the drivers for the disk interface cards otherwise it wouldn't have been able to install onto the disks.
    Any advice greatly appreciated.
    Kind Regards
    Jesse

    The solution for my problem was reinstalling linux-firmware & linux. Maybe this can help you too.
    I have booted from a live cd and doing these steps:
    RAID Array scan
    mdadm --examine --scan > /etc/mdadm.conf
    RAID Array start
    mdadm --assemble /dev/md1
    mdadm --assemble /dev/md2
    mdadm --assemble /dev/md3
    mdadm --assemble /dev/md4
    LVM scan & aktivieren
    vgscan
    vgchange -a y
    Mounten von „root“ & „boot“
    mount /dev/mapper/root-root /mnt/root/
    mount /dev/md1 /mnt/root/boot/
    In „chroot“ wechseln
    cd /mnt/root/
    „dev“, „proc“, „sys“ einbinden
    mount -t proc proc proc/
    mount -t sysfs sys sys/
    mount -o bind /dev/ dev/
    Nun / ändern
    chroot ./
    Reinstalling packages with
    pacman -S linux-firmware linux
    May I could help you
    jesus loves you

  • Solaris 10 x86 Won't Startup After Install - system just restarts itself?

    Ok, I'm another one of those wacky Vista people. I have a Dell Latitude D630 running a dual boot scenario with Vista Ultimate and Solaris 10.
    I had plenty of issues getting that working but it does work. Vista WILL boot. Solaris won't boot. Solaris failsafe will boot.
    Now the issue is....
    Solaris will not boot. When I select it from the GRUB menu, I see some text that flashes really quickly before the system restarts. It's the same text that I see when I boot failsafe mode.
    Something to the effect of Sun Solaris.... blah blah....Subject To License Terms and Conditions....
    So it's as if it's trying to boot Solaris, but for some reason it just restarts the system. The only thing that works is failsafe mode and Vista.
    How can I troubleshoot this issue when I can only get in failsafe?
    Please note I'm an IT professional (so I'm quite capable) but I have ZERO Solaris experience and limited (very limited) Linux experience so break it down for me if you will.
    Thank you in advance!
    SPECIFIC DETAILS:
    *1. Solaris 10 x86 Platform*
    *2. Windows Vista Ultimate*
    *3. Dell Latitude D630 Notebook, 2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM*
    *4. (1) HDD with a Vista and Solaris partition*
    *5. I have tried installing Solaris 10 (3) times to resolve. To no avail.*
    *7. Failsafe mode does boot.*
    *8. Grub looks like this:*
    kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot
    modul /platform/i86pc/boot_archive
    Edited by: derrickonline on May 13, 2008 4:53 PM
    Edited by: derrickonline on May 13, 2008 4:57 PM

    I should have searched the forums first. This was the solution to my issue....
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10249826

  • Hd won't boot after installing solaris 10

    I installed cd1 for Solaris 10 for x64/x86. Then I rebooted as I was instructed by the setup but the pc won't boot the hd. Am I doing something wrong? How can I boot my hd to solaris?

    Having just installed Solaris 10 u1 on a system myself recently. This version now uses a different boot loader. So it may help others to know which version you are installing. (maybe it's opensolaris?)
    Also, the drives on these systems are first partitioned using the DOS "fdisk" type partitioning. You basically create a SOLARIS2 type partition and build the "format slices" inside it. If this Solaris partition isn't marked as "active" in fdisk you will get no place fast. So check that first.
    Usually the install does all this for you but depending on how you did the install it may not have.

  • Solaris 10 x86 - software RAID boot

    What I can write in eeprom : - for boot form 1-st, and if it absent - from 2-nd disk ? (2 disks in soft raid). two bootpath ?
    In Solaris 9/sparc for boot with one working HDD in mirror (2 disks in mirrir) I wrote in /etc/system : set md:mirrored_root_flag=1
    What I can wrote for this in solaris 10/ x86 ?

    Just for the record: The problem is solved.
    I went on looking for more info on this message:
    Oct 14 00:07:09 schille gda: [ID 107833 kern.notice] Sense Key: ICRC error during UDMAAnd then found an interesting post from 2004 by Juergen Keil:
    The "bad block detected" message appears to be an old/obsolete error
    message text, somewhere in the Solaris "ata" driver.
    The ATA-1 standard (1997?) defined the 0x80 bit in the IDE
    controller's error register as "bad block detected". (See page 32 on
    <URL:http://www.t13.org/project/d0791r4c-ATA-1.pdf>)
    The 0x80 bit seems to be "reserved" (undefined, not used any more)
    with ATA-2 and ATA-3.
    ATA-4 and newer now defines this bit 0x80 as ICRC "interface CRC error
    has occurred during an Ultra DMA data transfer" when using ultra dma
    transfers. (see the description of the "READ DMA" or "WRITE DMA"
    command in <URL:http://www.t13.org/project/d1153r18-ATA-ATAPI-4.pdf>).
    The Solaris ata driver seems to interpret the 0x80 bit according to
    the old / obsolete 1997 ATA-1 standard.
    So the "bad block detected" message seems to be a hint that some sort
    of data corruption is happening on the IDE interface during UDMA data
    transfers with the HDD. With UDMA capable disks it apparently does
    not mean "the disk drive is dying".
    I went to search what could cause a hardware datacorruption on my system and found that my internal removeable disktray was making bad contact.
    After replacement everything worked as expected.

  • Solaris 10 06/06 x86 HP DL585 boot hang aftrer reboot HELP!!!

    Solaris 10 06/06 x86 HP DL585 boot hang aftrer reboot
    when I shutdown server and power on,
    solaris usually start.
    but after "reboot" (or "init 6"), boot hang on
    "SunOS Release 5.10 Version....
    Copyright ...
    Use is subject to license terms"
    HELP!!!

    try getting the Solaris x86 drivers frm HP....
    http://search.hp.com/redirect.html?type=REG&qt=Solaris+x86&url=http%3A//h18007.www1.hp.com/support/files/server/us/download/22412.html%3Fjumpid%3Dreg_R1002_USEN&pos=1
    hope it helps.

  • Install error for Oracle 10g on Solaris x86 64-bit.  NETCA won't run

    Hi All,
    I'm installing Oracle 10.2.0.1 on Solaris x86 64-bit. I run the Oracle installer and all runs well until the NETCA portion of the install. It then errors (error file below). When i attempt to run NETCA outside of the installer i'm getting the same error output. I have verified my OS version and that all dependent packages are installed. I'm not sure what is causing this. Any help would be greatly appriciated.
    thanks, dave
    ERROR FILE:
    An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
    Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0xFEEF24E8
    Function=strchr+0x8
    Library=/lib/libc.so.1
    Current Java thread:
         at oracle.net.common.NetGetEnv.getDNSDomain(Native Method)
         at oracle.net.ca.ConfigureProfile.setDefaultProfileParams(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.setupConfigObjects(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.<init>(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.net.ca.NetCA.main(Unknown Source)
    Dynamic libraries:
    0x8050000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/bin/java
    0xfefc0000      /lib/libthread.so.1
    0xfefd0000      /lib/libdl.so.1
    0xfeed0000      /lib/libc.so.1
    0xfea00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
    0xfee80000      /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1
    0xfee50000      /lib/libsocket.so.1
    0xfedc0000      /lib/libnsl.so.1
    0xfeda0000      /lib/libm.so.1
    0xfeeb0000      /usr/lib/libsched.so.1
    0xfe9a0000      /lib/libm.so.2
    0xfed50000      /lib/libscf.so.1
    0xfe980000      /lib/libdoor.so.1
    0xfe960000      /lib/libuutil.so.1
    0xfe940000      /lib/libmd5.so.1
    0xfe920000      /lib/libmp.so.2
    0xfe8e0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libhpi.so
    0xfe890000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so
    0xfe850000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so
    0xfe830000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so
    0xf1a00000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8.so.3
    0xfc780000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/methods_en_US.UTF-8.so.3
    0xf13c0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
    0xf0f90000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_image.so
    0xf0f30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/motif21/libmawt.so
    0xf0d50000      /usr/dt/lib/libXm.so.4
    0xf0cf0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4
    0xf0cc0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0
    0xf1890000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXtst.so.1
    0xf0c30000      /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4
    0xf0be0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libdps.so.5
    0xf0a90000      /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6
    0xf0a70000      /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6
    0xf0a30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnjni10.so
    0xefe00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1
    0xefc60000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnnz10.so
    0xf0a10000      /lib/libkstat.so.1
    0xefc40000      /lib/libgen.so.1
    0xefc20000      /lib/librt.so.1
    0xefbf0000      /lib/libaio.so.1
    0xefbd0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libldapjclnt10.so
    Heap at VM Abort:
    Heap
    def new generation total 576K, used 343K [0xf1e00000, 0xf1ea0000, 0xf22e0000)
    eden space 512K, 55% used [0xf1e00000, 0xf1e467f8, 0xf1e80000)
    from space 64K, 96% used [0xf1e80000, 0xf1e8f798, 0xf1e90000)
    to space 64K, 0% used [0xf1e90000, 0xf1e90000, 0xf1ea0000)
    tenured generation total 1408K, used 338K [0xf22e0000, 0xf2440000, 0xf5e00000)
    the space 1408K, 24% used [0xf22e0000, 0xf2334ab8, 0xf2334c00, 0xf2440000)
    compacting perm gen total 4096K, used 3580K [0xf5e00000, 0xf6200000, 0xf9e00000)
    the space 4096K, 87% used [0xf5e00000, 0xf617f170, 0xf617f200, 0xf6200000)
    Local Time = Tue Aug 29 13:49:22 2006
    Elapsed Time = 225
    # The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
    # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_05-b04 mixed mode)
    #

    I have the same problem on Linux Debian 3.0.
    My /etc/hosts looks like:
    127.0.0.1     localhost.localdomain     localhost
    #192.168.100.1     bt.lan.home     bt
    #192.168.100.5     jacek.lan.home     jacek
    # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
    ::1     ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
    fe00::0 ip6-localnet
    ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
    ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
    ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
    ff02::3 ip6-allhostsPlease help.

  • Won't boot after installing Solaris 10

    Hi!
    I use Ultra 10 machine
    CPU: 1 440MHz
    Memory: 512M
    Disk: 20G
    I install Solaris by typing
    ok boot cdrom -text
    after choosing the network and time zone
    The system reboot, but it still stays in ok
    Does anyone have similar questions? Could you please help me with this? Thank you very much.

    tpe-link-test? true true
    scsi-initiator-id 7 7
    keyboard-click? false false
    keymap
    ttyb-rts-dtr-off false false
    ttyb-ignore-cd true true
    ttya-rts-dtr-off false false
    ttya-ignore-cd true true
    ttyb-mode 9600,8,n,1,- 9600,8,n,1,-
    ttya-mode 96
    pcia-probe-list 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4
    pcib-probe0list 1,2,3 1,2,3
    mfg-mode off off
    diag-level max max
    #power-cycles 106
    system-board-serial#
    system-board-date
    fcode-debug? false false
    output-device screen screen
    input-device keyboard keyboard
    load-base 16384 16384
    boot-command boot boot
    auto-boot? true true
    watchdog-rebot? false false
    diag-file -F cprbooter cprboot
    diag-device /pci@1f, 0/pci@1, 1/ide@3/.....disk net
    local-mac-address? false false
    ansi-terminal? true true
    screen-#columns 80 80
    screen-#rows 34 34
    silent-mode? false false
    use-nvramrc? false false
    nvramrc devalias pgx24/pci@1f,0...
    security-mode none
    security-password
    security-#badlogins 0
    oem-logo
    oem-logo? false false
    oem-banner
    oem-banner? false false
    hardware-revision
    last-hardware-update
    diag-switch? false false
    I bought Ultra 10 and hard drive separately on eBay
    It's my first installation on this hard drive. I have never boot from this drive before. The seller of the hard drive claimed that the hard drive is pulled out from a Ultra 10 machine. Thanks for your help.

  • Ultra60 with Teac CD-R58S won't boot Solaris 8 from CD

    Hi there,
    for my Ulra60 (2x 360MHz) I tried to replace the original Toshiba XM-6201B
    with the Teac CD-R58S drive.
    With this drive, the machine won't boot from CD. SCSI-ID ist set to 6. Terminator is on the cable.
    Booting from disk and copying a full 700MB-CD to disk ist working fine.
    Both drives, the Toshiba and the Teac have no jumper to set the blocksize.
    Anyone with some ideas here?
    73
    Peter

    I seem to remember reading in some forum (or wherever) that there were some issues with the July 2001 disks in Sun's distribution of commercially shipped disks.
    ... something about ... they were "made wrong".
    No corrupt files, but they had issues with being bootable.
    As you experienced, it showed as a hardware compatibility problem.
    Unless you <i>must</i> use them for some specific system, consider misplacing them.
    The 2/02 distro would have much more value for general purpose usage.

  • Core 2 Duo and solaris x86 11/06 works for me

    This is FYI, since I seen (and posted) problems, but I haven't seen the solution posted.
    I have successfully gotten solaris x86 11/06 to install and run on my core 2 duo machine. I had tried solaris x86 06/06, but I could only run in 32bit mode until patch 118855-19 was installed. It looks like 118855-33 is the baseline for 11/06.
    With 06/06 I had to edit the grub command and add " kernel/unix" to the end of the 2nd line. This would force 32 bit mode rather than 64 bit. If I tried 64 bit, it would enter an endless reboot cycle. Once I installed the patch to 118855-19 I could run solaris 10 06/06 in 64 bit mode without issue.
    Again, since solaris 10 11/06 is at 118855-33, it runs on my core2 machine straight from the install.
    Hope this helps

    On a laptop there is little point with running a 64-bit operating system unless it physically has more than 4gb of ram, or if you are processing datasets exceeding 4GB of ram. Unless you're into assembly or use Solaris for some reason to manipulate media, little is to be gained by using 64-bit versions if anything. The increased pointer, integer, and padding causes more memory to use for the same software, most software on 64-bit operating systems runs in 32-bit mode because there is no need to have 16 exabyte memory addressing capability for anything but media encoders, giant databases, or extremely bloated single-threaded software. Sun Java Creator takes a heck of a lot of ram, but even at peak it's still under 4GB. If you move files bigger than 4GB, the ability to memory map all 4096MB might have less overhead on a 64-bit operating system, but generally from an end-user perspective, especially on a fast Intel or Opteron system, you won't notice the difference much. Solaris is bi-arch, a large chunk of Windows Vista and XP x64 is bi-arch, and most of FreeBSD and Linux are bi-arch in 64-bit versions, as I said, no point in making everything 64-bit. 64-bit device drivers is an issue for every OS, you should stick with 32-bit on a laptop, and hold off on desktops unless you need extended assembly registers available only in 64-bit mode.

  • Solaris x86 8 bootdisk

    For some reason my computer fails to boot from scsi cdrom, is there a
    bootdisk for Solaris x86? I have a Tekram DC-390F SCSI adapter and
    Pioneer DR-U24X CDROM-drive.

    Tekram offer a driver for download - this presupposes you have a system already installed and running Solaris so that you can actually install the Tekram driver.
    What Tekram have failed to implement and deliver is the "ITU" version of the driver - Install Time Update is Sun's mechanism \for allowing installation of drivers for devices which need to be bootable duringthe installation of the system - you'll see something like "F4 - use ITU floppy" along the bottom of the install screen.
    Options are: complain to Tekram and ask if they've heard of ITU
    or
    install with IDE CD then add SCSI support after

Maybe you are looking for