Solaris 11.1 x86, lots of "snapshot already exists" in backup pool

Experts,
This is strange. I have been using time-slider and a synchronization script every 15 minutes since the OpenSolaris days. The recent update to 11.1 has caused the backup pool randomly to refuse to delete phantom snapshots during a weekly trim of the pool. Just now I saw several errors during a snapshot delete:
deleting: backup/export/site@zfs-auto-snap_daily-2012-11-05-14h48
cannot destroy 'backup/export/site@zfs-auto-snap_daily-2012-11-05-14h48': snapshot already exists
The solution is to export then import the pool, but this happened earlier today and I could not export, even with the -f flag because the pool was busy (?). I suspended the synchronization and could find no processes with open files on mount points. I settled on a reboot.
Does this happen to anyone else? Is there a less disruptive way to recover?
Also, I have noticed that CPU utilization in pool and I/O operations is markedly higher on 11.1 vs. 11. Server is HP DL585 with 4x dual core Opteron 8216. Before the 11.1 upgrade, scrubbing three pools could sustain 400MB/s throughput with about 30% CPU utilization. After 11.1, the scrub will consume about 70% CPU with 320-ish MB/s throughput. Nothing else has changed. Similar effects happen during the regular snapshot synchronizations.
Any insight on either issue is appreciated.
Thanks,
Marty

I also get this - it's quite annoying.
This may help:
#!/bin/sh
svcadm disable -t time-slider
for f in `zfs list -H -t snapshot -o name`; do zfs release -r org.opensolaris:time-slider-plugin:zfs-send $f; done
svcadm clear svc:/application/time-slider/plugin:zfs-send
svcadm enable time-slider

Similar Messages

How will encryption of my computer affect my already existing external backup drive?

I need to encrypt my macbook air and I am worried that this will affect future time machine backups. I have an external hard drive that I use and I don't know how that will handle the new encripted backups from now on. Am I better off buying a new external hardrive? I am afraid the new encrypted files will force the drive to reformat.
Thank you!

encrypt it with what?
3rd party software that is .dmg mountable like Espionage? That would be a train wreck if you try to TM backup same.
Or use Apples encryption?
Make a regular TM backup, .........archive your data onto a 2nd hard drive,...... and encrypt select data on your Air,....... but unlock same before backing it up again in a TM refresh backup

Installation of solaris 10 on x86 intel dual core or core 2 duo

hi all,
while i am installing solaris 10 on x86 machine which has 250 GB hard disk and 4 GB RAM with intel dual core processor
the first steps are going cool i.e. in the first cd it asks about partitions and it is accepting the partitions and also the partitions sizes what i am giving are:
/ -- 30 GB, /etc -- 6GB, /home -- 6GB, /usr -- 6GB, /export/home -- 100GB, /var -- 9GB, swap-- 10GB
and after the first CD got installed it asks for restart the system and when it
boots then i am getting the booting option and i selected it as solaris and one more thing to tell is it has already Windows XP pro+sp2
after selecting it boots with solaris and
after few seconds it restarts
please tell me if any body knows that is there any compatability issue with the processor that solaris is not going to support for intel core 2 duo or dual core processors
looking for the good reply

OK, so what are the options if we run the HCL check and come up with some incompatibilities??
I have Solaris 11/06 (from DVD media) installed on a brand new Dell Inspiron 530 (dual boot with XP). After the grub menu appears, and selecting 'Solaris', it takes about 3 minutes to get to a command line. I get a few errors at that time, such as:
file in / differ from the boot archive: /etc/path_to_inst
cannot find /etc/devices/mdi_ib_cache: no such file
I tried running 'svcadm clear system/boot-archive' and it seems to attempt to boot into a graphical CDE, but I just end up with an unintelligible multi-colored display, and need to power off.
I've checked the HCL and found some incompatibilities, but I don't know how to work-around these?
Running the Hardware compatibility test came up with the following:
No Solaris Driver
No Solaris Driver
Communication
Conexant
HSF 56k Data/Fax Modem
No Solaris Driver
No Solaris Driver
Network
Intel Corporation
*82562V-2 10/100 Network Connection*
No Solaris Driver
No Solaris Driver
Multimedia
Intel Corporation
HD Audio Controller
Can I simply disable the Modem and the HD audio in windows XP device manager, then reboot to Solaris, to get around these two (I tried this already)??
For the network card driver incompatibility, there is a Sun doc that says the workaround is to run: update_drv -a -i '"pci8086,1064"' iprb, but when I run this command at the initial Solaris command line, or try to edit any file for that matter, I get the error "read-only file system" Seems I have my hands tied in maintenance mode.
Thanks.

Solaris 8/07 x86, wireless intel 2200bg networking

Just finished a dvd-based install of solaris 8/07 x86 (not opensolaris) and everything good, except wireless networking.
Before the install, I ran the suitability/compatibility tester and it vetted my wifi and everything else.
ifconfig doesn't show my iwi interface. no /dev/iwi? either. And no wificonfig tool anywhere on the hard drive.
Did I miss a step in the install?
What do I need to do to be able to wifi on this supported wifi?
I will eventually try the opensolaris, but I have 640MB and the opensolaris doesn't install unless it sees 768 MB.
N.B: openBSD and BSD/nixes experienced ... but a little new to solaris so any and all pointers and details appreciated.
Thanks,
/Scott
Edited by: 8F27E956 on Feb 9, 2008 3:56 PM

ifconfig doesn't show my iwi interface.Did you do:
ifconfig -a plumb
ifconfig -a
This is the answer to a really FAQ:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"ifconfig -a" on Solaris will only show "plumb"ed interfaces.
Plumb your interface(s) first!
If you don't know the name (or index#) use "ifconfig -a plumb" to plumb all (that wasn't already plumbed)!
"plumb" is to power on, and load and initialize the driver for the relevant interface.
P�l

Installing Solaris 10 on x86

I have downloaded the iso files and zip files(all 5 files) for Solaris 10 for x86.
How do I go about installing it on a particular partition?I
am running Win XP Pro, but have made an unformated partition on a logical drive in the extended partitions.
How much disc space do I need?(The documentation says 2gb,but I guess I shud allocate mroe?

I've just installed Solaris 10 1/06 yesterday. I have already had windows xp installed on my system and there was no problem with this. At that time the partition configuration was: 5,5GB for the Primary Partition on which XP was installed and the rest to about 80GB was an extended partition (logical).
Using Partition Magic I resized and moved the logical (larger) partition so that I would get some free space before and after that partition. I've used the "left side" unused space created to enlarge the winXP NTFS partition to a total of 9GB. The unformatted space of 15 GB remaining at the "right side" I've formatted as a primary partition (FAT32) - this does not really matter, but I wanted there to be a partition I could see.
As you can see, I reserved 15 GB for Solaris 10. The full installation costs about 6-6,5 GB. During install you will be prompted for a sort of "drive configuration" in which I specified about 10GB for the Solaris system, 4GB for my Home "drive"/directory (I'm not used to Unix terminology) and about 850 MB for Swap (beeing taken into consideration the physical memory of 512MB). The system works fine like this. The only problem I get now is that Partition Magic will not start anymore in windows because it does not recognize the Solaris partition and that creates an error. :P
Hope it helps.

How print duplex on Solaris 10 0508 x86 ?

Hello,
I just installed Solaris 10 0508 x86 on a Ultra 20. We have a networked HP laserjet 8150dn printer. What is the option to print duplex?
Previously on Solaris 10, 1106, I followed the instructions on http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/submitted/duplex_printing.html and was able to print double-sided.
However, now on update 0508, the same lp and lpadmin option "-o sides=two-sided-short-edge" doesn't work - still prints single-sided. What gives? Please help me save a tree!
These lp or lpadmin options didn't work either:
"-o duplex"
"-o sides=duplex"
Also looked at HP's SOLe134.PKG, but it's for SPARC, not x86 - couldn't find a download for x86.
Thanks!
Edited by: onetree on Jul 16, 2008 9:36 PM

I'm not sure if there was some sort of corruption, but I eventually resolved the issue by removing and readding the printing-related packages from the CD:
SUNWpcr
SUNWpcu
SUNWpsr
SUNWpsu
SUNWpsf
SUNWscplp
SUNWspman
SUNWscpu
and then installing a default local virtual printer before the network one:
# lpadmin -p new-printer -v /dev/term/a -T PS -I postscript..
# enable new-printer
# accept new-printer
# lpstat -t

Solaris 8 on x86: been there, am back

Just a quick opinion on my Solaris experience: it's as evil as Win2K when it comes to partitioning, except it's even harder (in my case not possible) to get lilo to boot Solaris, even on a primary partition... it's not quicker than Linux or FreeBSD, as user-hostile as *BSD, the install feels clunky and awkward...
CDE is awful, even XFCE beats it by miles, I'm glad GNOME is there but not for x86 alas??
ash could really be replaced by bash or anything with command line completion for instance, etc etc.
I won't blame them for lack of hardware support, but as it is I was without network under Solaris (USB ADSL), so really there wasn't much to keep me using it. Except it's messed up my partitions badly enough that I had to reinstall Linux and FreeBSD...
I am sure quite a few of you disagree with that, but I haven't seen any reason to stick to Solaris on my x86. Dissenting opinions please feel free to do so, I am disappointed but curious nevertheless...

Hello,
Actually, I have had a miserable experience attempting to install Solaris 8 on "ANY" INTEL hardware I have. At least, you were able to get it to install. It's a shame though, Sun and others complain about how Microsoft is trying to monopolize, but as much as I do agree for the most part, I have to give it to MS. Their OS' 95/98/W2K/NT, they all work on "ANY" hardware it seems as long as you can get the drivers from the manufacturer -- from the oldest to the newest machines.
For Sun to enjoy a better share of the market, it needs to spend more time ensuring its OS works(even if it's not supported) on most INTEL H/W. This will ensure people, like myself(consultants) who are looking at new possibilities for Unix can seriously consider the product by evaluating it on simple machines and once proven can actually consider the product as part of a recommendation to customers. What this has reaffirmed, is that, the big 3 Unix houses -- HP, SUN, and IBM have a great product on Mid-to-Mainframes but are still sleeping while MS makes a BIG whole in their pocket with software that works on ANY! platform or H/W. The reality is that I would be hard pressed to recommend Linux for any "Prime Time" production(don't get me wrong, Linux is just fine and I use it and will continue to use it, but it's not ready for prime time) application and although I do not believe MS NT or 2K has the maturity of Unix, it certainly stands out in terms of viability. If this is another way to sell more proprietary boxes, I'll just say -- remember what happened to apple? Great product with a very smaaall market share...
As you can tell, I am deeply dissapointed because SUN make awsome workstations and servers and can easly translate that success to the INTEL platform by having their software run on more H/W(even if it's not supported). This would definitely go a long way, in my opinion, to gain the market share they seem to be wanting to acquire since they did take MS to court.
Very Dissapointed,
Frank

Installation of Solaris 10 pr x86 paltform

Hello !
Recently I get a version of Solaris 10 for x86 paltform.
I've tried to install Solaris on my comp but I get the next
error:
elf32 read error
Load error: Read of "paltform/i86pc/kernel/unix failed.
First I thought that the problem is in SATA 160 Maxtor disk,
becouse i had one problem with live distribution of Ubuntu Linux too.
So I remove this harddisk and i've replaced it with the ATA Maxtor disk.
I've got the same result.
Has anyone any idea what could be wrong?
Thank you!
by Damijan Bec

I'm newbie in Unix arena so what is "elf32 and " fb" ?
I was hooked by linux three years ago, and now I'm trying to find out what the really UNIX lookse like. And the other reason is that ESRI (GIS software) software works better on UNIX platform then Linux.

Reconfigure reboot for Solaris 10 u5 x86 guest in VirtualBox

Hello,
I just installed the new kernal patch into a Solaris 10 u5 x86 32-bit guest OS in VirtualBox 2.0.4 on a WinXP 32-bit host. I need to do a reconfigure reboot. I can't seem to get to the ok prompt from which to use boot -r. init 0 does not work, it only offers a "push any key to reboot."
What is the optimal way to initiate a reconfigure reboot for Solaris 10 in my setup?
I tried the grub-based technique in which, upon reboot, I get the grub menu and push "e." That gets me to another grub screen with 3 entries. I selected the kernal entry, pushed "c" to add "-r" to the end of the line, and then "b" to reboot. Is that the best way to reconfigure reboot for Sol 10 x86.
The above method did configure devices on reboot, but I'm not sure that is the best way to boot -r
Thank you in advance...

x86 machines (including virtual machines) do not have an OBP or an 'ok' prompt.
You have to manipulate the GRUB either through interactive commands like you've shown, or by editing the menu.lst file to change boot parameters.
Of course for reconfiguration, you also have the option of touching '/reconfigure' and doing a normal reboot.
Darren

Where can I J2SDK for solaris 8 on x86?

Hi,
Would you kindly tell me where I can find J2SDK for solaris 8 on x86?
Thx,
Regards,
Justine

Follow this link:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/download-solaris.html
The version is the same for Sparc or Intel.

How can I set ne2000 network adapter in Solaris 8 for x86

I am a beginner. I can not set a ne2000 compatible network adapter(isa) in Solaris 8 for x86.
I do follows:
write the file ' /kernel/drv/nei.conf ' with ' name="nei" parent="isa" reg=0x1,0x0300,0x1f interrupts=10 '
and use the command: drvconfig -i nei --failed
use the command: drv_add -i nei; devlinks; --there is no the command drv_add
use the command: touch /reconfigure; reboot
after reboot, use the command: ifconfig nei0 plumb --failed
Did I miss something obvious, or what driver should I use?

After backing up the suspect hard drive, I ran Disk Repair on it and found no problems. Then ran Disk Warrior again and no problems. It is a Hitachi, btw.
As for the PrefPane issue: Repairing disk permissions on the main volume and on the partition that holds the system did not make any difference.
Reinstalled the 10.5.8 upgrade, performed safe start and then repaired permissions again. Still getting a blank PrefPane for network.
Next step is to try and trash the System Configuration plist and Network Interfaces plist.

Could not start Agent on a Solaris 5.10u2 x86 machine

Hi,
I installed SunMC 3.6.1 on a Solaris 5.10u2 x86 machine. Only Agent
and Concole are installed.
There's no error during installation and setup, but the agent could not be started.
# /opt/SUNWsymon/sbin/es-start -a
Could not start Agent.
After running svcs -x, I could see:
# svcs -x
svc:/application/management/sunmcagent:default has no "restarter" property group; ignoring.
svc:/application/management/sunmcplatform:default has no "restarter" property group; ignoring.
svc:/application/print/server:default (LP print server)
State: disabled since Mon Aug 21 10:41:38 2006
Reason: Disabled by an administrator.
See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-05
See: lpsched(1M)
Impact: 2 dependent services are not running. (Use -v for list.)
# svcs -v
offline - Aug_21 - svc:/application/print/ipp-listener:default
offline - Aug_21 - svc:/application/print/rfc1179:default
- - - svc:/application/management/sunmcagent:default
How to solve this problem? Any help is appreciated.
Hal

Hi Hal, :)
# /opt/SUNWsymon/sbin/es-start -a
Could not start Agent.I've seen this before too. "svcadm enable/disable sunmcagent" didn't fix things. But for some reason if I started the agent interactively (es-start -ai) it worked... and I let the Agent load a few modules and verified it worked in the Console. Then once I quit out of interactive mode (thereby stopping the Agent) svcadm enable/disable and es-start/stop worked correctly again.
I had that happen to me 2-3 times now, and every time mucking about in interactive mode a bit fixed it. It must reset something in svcs.
Regards,
[email protected]
http://www.HalcyonInc.com

Latest patches for solaris 10 - sparc & x86

Hi,
Pls any to help me.
How can i know the latest patches is released by sun microsystem (solaris 10 - sparc & x86) ?
Thanks in Advance

Start here:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/show.do?target=patches/patch-access
and here:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/show.do?target=patchpage
You may need to sign up for a free SunSolve account.
You can download README files that show all the latest patches for latest versions, view individual patch information, etc. You need a subscription to download the full patch clusters, but you can download individual patches for free if they are security/bug fixes.

Solaris Express Developer x86 -- only 64-bit?

Hi, people, glad to be back. Just downloaded Solaris Express Developer edition x86 and installed -- almost with no problems.
It's a system with Intel Celeron D with 64-bit and Hyper Threading support, DDR2 1Gb.
Now running Solaris I noticed it's a 64-bit version, not 32-bit, as I meant to have. The command `isainfo -n` gives back ... "amd64"!
Is there a 32-bit version of Solaris Express DE x86?
Or maybe I need not worry at all and keep running the 64-bit one (actually, I've got no problem as yet)?
Thanks in advance for any comments.

So, my system supports 64-bit computing after all. I
never thought about it, in fact.
But does it mean Solaris Express DE x86 runs as
64-bit on the systems supporting 64-bit, and as
32-bit on 32-bit-only systems?Yes, that's correct. Solaris 10 was the first version of Solaris to support 64 bit operation on the x86 architecture.
It and later versions (including Solaris Express DE x86) should automatically detect the architecture and run in that mode at boot time. There are some ways to force it to run in 32 bit mode only if necessary, but that would be unusual.
Darren

Does WebLogic 6.x support Solaris for Intel x86 platform?

Does WebLogic 6.x support Solaris for Intel x86 platform?
Thanks,
Levi

levi wrote:
Does WebLogic 6.x support Solaris for Intel x86 platform?
Thanks,
See http://edocs.bea.com/wls/platforms/index.html - as far as I
can tell, it is not supported.
regards,
Per Jessen

Solaris 11.1 x86, lots of "snapshot already exists" in backup pool

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for