Solaris 9 and Intel 8086,109a nics

Due to MySQL Cluster hanging Solaris 10, I have attempted to run Solaris 9 on these Supermicro 6014 Intel servers. The hardware is a little too new, but it mostly works. I can not boot directly off HDD ("prom_panic: Could not mount filesystem") so I am currently using a boot floppy. This will do temporarily.
However, I had to use an old 3com nic in the server, and it would be much better if I could get the on-board nics to work. I have been attempting to get them to plumb for quite a while without success.
The meaty details:
SunOS mysqldata02 5.9 Generic_122301-17 i86pc i386 i86pc
Installed "115320-12" in the hopes of it helping.
mysqldata02:~# prtconf -vp | grep 109a
compatible: 'pci8086,109a.15d9.109a.0' + 'pci8086,109a.15d9.109a' + 'pci15d9,109a' + 'pci8086,109a.0' + 'pci8086,109a' + 'pciclass,020000' + 'pciclass,0200'
device-id: 0000109a
model: 'PCI: 15d9,109a - Intel(R) PRO/1000 Server Adapter Driver'
name: 'pci15d9,109a'
subsystem-id: 0000109a
mysqldata02:~# grep 109a /etc/driver_aliases
e1000g "pci8086,109a"
e1000g "pciex8086,109a"
mysqldata02:~# mount -F pcfs /dev/diskette /mnt
mysqldata02:~# grep 109a /mnt/solaris/devicedb/master
pci8086,109a pci8086,109a net pci none "Intel(R) PRO/1000 Server Adapter Driver"
mysqldata02:~# ifconfig e1000g0 plumb
ifconfig: plumb: e1000g0: No such file or directory
mysqldata02:~# ls -l /dev/e1*
/dev/e1*: No such file or directory
mysqldata02:~# modinfo | grep e100
mysqldata02:~#
mysqldata02:~# devfsadm -v
mysqldata02:~# devfsadm -i e1000g
devfsadm: driver failed to attach: e1000g
mysqldata02:~# dmesg | egrep -i 'e1000g|109a'
mysqldata02:~#
mysqldata02:~# egrep -i 'e1000g|109a' /var/adm/messages
mysqldata02:~#
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root sys 133632 Jul 20 2007 /kernerl/drv/e1000g
mysqldata02:/kernel/drv# modload /kernel/drv/e1000g
mysqldata02:/kernel/drv# modinfo | grep e1000g
194 d2ceb000 15a26 110 1 e1000g (Intel(R) PRO/1000 Server Adapte)
Repeat all commands above, no difference. It just does not want to see it. I must admit I do not know if it is supposed to be pci8086 or pciex8086. Perhaps Solaris 9 can not do pciex?
I have tried disabling ACPI, and Plug'n'Pray, and all combinations of those two.
Any help would be appreciated.

And anyway if you use a Solaris8 DCA that works the samem, since they are not much changes in hardware support for x86, and the important thing is to use further a Solaris 9 Cd to install.
By the way these IBM x86 boxes (300 an NetVista series from a pair of years ago) are a pain,they don't support el-torito, even with the more recent bios.

Similar Messages

Tiffsplit crashes on Solaris (sparc and intel), okay on Linux

Hello experts,
I have a tiff file that causes a crash with tiffsplit when run
on Solaris (both Sparc and Intel) but not on Linux.
It works successfully on
Red Hat Linux 2.4.18 -- libtiff.so.3.5
but crashes on
Solaris 9 on Sparc -- libtiff.so.3.7.1
Solaris 9 on Sparc -- libtiff.so.3.9.4
Solaris 10 on Intel -- libtiff.so.3.8.2
It's crashing at a call to
TIFFGetField(in, TIFFTAG_GROUP3OPTIONS, &v)
and pstack shows stack trace like
$ pstack /var/core/core.tiffsplit.15965
core '/var/core/core.tiffsplit.15965' of 15965: /usr/local/bin/tiffsplit file.tiff
ff32a4e8 _TIFFVGetField (26280, 124, ffbff260, 67, 27e48, 2a) + 1a0
ff3498f0 PredictorVGetField (26280, 124, ffbff25c, ff3213c4, 3, 26288) + 30
ff32acd0 TIFFVGetField (26280, 124, ffbff25c, ff34d838, ff34d848, ff34d858) + 70
ff32ac50 TIFFGetField (26280, 124, ffbff2a4, 0, 0, 26000) + 1c
00011754 tiffcp (26280, 285f8, ffbff321, ffbff318, ffbfffdd, 404) + 1f8
0001135c main (fffffffe, 285f8, ffbff7a0, 26130, 0, 0) + 98
0001115c _start (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 5c
Running tiffinfo produces following:
$ tiffinfo file.tiff
file.tiff: Warning, unknown field with tag 292 (0x124) ignored.
file.tiff: Warning, unknown field with tag 326 (0x146) ignored.
file.tiff: Warning, unknown field with tag 327 (0x147) ignored.
file.tiff: Warning, unknown field with tag 328 (0x148) ignored.
file.tiff: Warning, unknown field with tag 37680 (0x9330) ignored.
TIFF Directory at offset 0xb156
Subfile Type: (0 = 0x0)
Image Width: 1728 Image Length: 2162
Resolution: 204, 196 pixels/inch
Bits/Sample: 1
Compression Scheme: LZW
Photometric Interpretation: min-is-black
Date & Time: "2010/07/28 14:19:00"
Software: "....."
Orientation: row 0 top, col 0 lhs
Samples/Pixel: 1
Rows/Strip: 56
Planar Configuration: single image plane
Page Number: 1-1
Predictor: none 1 (0x1)
file.tiff: Warning, unknown field with tag 292 (0x124) ignored.
file.tiff: Warning, unknown field with tag 326 (0x146) ignored.
file.tiff: Warning, unknown field with tag 327 (0x147) ignored.
file.tiff: Warning, unknown field with tag 328 (0x148) ignored.
TIFF Directory at offset 0x14512
Subfile Type: (0 = 0x0)
Image Width: 1728 Image Length: 2162
Resolution: 204, 196 pixels/inch
Bits/Sample: 1
Compression Scheme: LZW
Photometric Interpretation: min-is-black
Date & Time: "2010/07/28 14:19:00"
Software: "......."
Orientation: row 0 top, col 0 lhs
Samples/Pixel: 1
Rows/Strip: 56
Planar Configuration: single image plane
Page Number: 1-1
Predictor: none 1 (0x1)
What could I do to make it work properly on Solaris 9 on Sparc ?
Thanks for your help.

You should have no problems if both are using Sun's Java Runtime enviroment. I believe there are some problems with Microsofts implementation of Java, but I don't know exactly what.

Solaris 10 and Intel RAID Controllers SRCSAS144E

Where can I download a drivers ?

That answer was trollish.
Did you look into this card - did you even try to see if Solaris could support a PCI-express MegaRAID SAS? This is the heart of the - ssr212mc2 - http://www.intel.com/design/servers/storage/ssr212mc2/index.htm . This is a pure Intel reference design. This is the most drives that fits into a 2U **EVER**. This is the best storage product in existence today. So being snarky and not supporting it will only hurt Sun. The SRCSAS144E is a MegaRAID SAS controller. Need I remind you that the Sun v60 and Sun v65 were pure Intel reference servers that worked GREAT! It works in Linux, want to see:
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5 (Final)
uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 #1 SMP Mon Oct 22 08:32:28 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
megasas: 00.00.03.05 Mon Oct 02 11:21:32 PDT 2006
megasas: 0x1000:0x0411:0x8086:0x1003: bus 9:slot 14:func 0
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:09:0e.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 185
megasas: FW now in Ready state
scsi0 : LSI Logic SAS based MegaRAID driver
Vendor: Intel Model: SSR212MC Rev: 01A
Type: Enclosure ANSI SCSI revision: 05
Vendor: INTEL Model: SRCSAS144E Rev: 1.03
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05
SCSI device sda: 2919915520 512-byte hdwr sectors (1494997 MB)
sda: Write Protect is off
sda: Mode Sense: 1f 00 00 08
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
SCSI device sda: 2919915520 512-byte hdwr sectors (1494997 MB)
sda: Write Protect is off
sda: Mode Sense: 1f 00 00 08
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
sda: sda1 sda2 sda3
sd 0:2:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda
Fusion MPT base driver 3.04.02
Copyright (c) 1999-2005 LSI Logic Corporation
Fusion MPT SAS Host driver 3.04.02
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:04:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 177
mptbase: Initiating ioc0 bringup
ioc0: SAS1064E: Capabilities={Initiator}
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:04:00.0 to 64
scsi1 : ioc0: LSISAS1064E, FwRev=01100000h, Ports=1, MaxQ=511, IRQ=177
09:0e.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS
Subsystem: Intel Corporation SRCSAS144E RAID Controller
09:0e.0 0104: 1000:0411
Subsystem: 8086:1003
Usually we get this problem with PERCs here, this crap where Solaris drivers, unlike **all** other operating systems, strangely don't work with Modern (far more modern than any of the crap storage cards Sun sells) versions of LSI cards.
Strange.

Solaris 9 and Intel 845

Hi
I'm trying to get this Intel 845 graphic chip to work with Solaris 9.
I've installed The XFree86 porting kit, tried the VESA driver but it still doesn't work.
Had a look att this page, but it didn't help me.
http://www.xfree86.org/~dawes/845driver.html
Any ideas anyone???

After two days of hard work and digging the Sun documents site, I found the following:
Execute the code below to re-scan the SCSI bus and identify any changes made in the storages, like adding or removing virtual disks.
cfgadm -al -o show_FCP_dev c#where c# is the controller number allocated for your SAN
bash-3.2# cfgadm -a
Ap_Id Type Receptacle Occupant Condition
c5 fc-fabric connected configured unknown
...Cheers,
Andreas

How can I use the "gcc compiler and emacs editor" in Solaris 8 for Intel?

I installed Solaris 8 for Intel to my desktop computer.
After the installation, I found I couldn't use the companion software (the software CD included in the Multilinugal Media Kit for Solaris 8) - especially the emacs editor and gcc compilers.
I certainly installed the companion software to my computer. And I can identify that those softwares are
really installed to my system. In order to check out whether I installed them or not, I went to the "System Administrator" and opened the "Solaris Product Registry", in which I identified that all the files in
the companion software were succesfully installed in my computer.
However, when I open terminal or console box and tries to use those
software, the system responds that "there is no emacs or gcc."
Why I cannot use those things?
Did I install the companion software wrong?
I really don't understand why I can't use them.
For your reference, I saw the directories "/usr/bin" and "usr/ccs/bin"
too.
In /usr/bin I typed
#as
and no such command.
In /usr/ccs/bin
#as
and also no such command
was what I had as a response.
If I installed the companion software CD correctly and if they are installed somewhere in my computer,
where I can find them and how I can use those softwares?
Lastly, whenever I try to connect to my ISP via telnet mode, I see this
message.
"Try to connect ...
connected to ***.***.***.*** (IP address of my ISP)
Closed by foreign hosts."
Is there any one who knows why this happens?
Thanks for reading my question.

gcc and emacs install in /opt/sfw. You should change your path statement to include /opt/sfw/bin and should obtain the FAQ from sunfreeware.com. The FAQ answers all your questions.
I have installed gcc and gtk and am using both at this time.
[email protected]

Cheap KVM switch for Solaris 10 on US and Intel boxes?

Hi. Any one got some idea on which kind of KVM switch is supported on Solaris 10 on UltraSparc as well as Intel boxes? I can only find those expensive ones for enterprise users, but I am just a home user, unable to afford that. Thanks for your suggestion!!

From what I can tell, containers (zones) are supported just fine on the x86/64 systems with the exception of Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 branded zones. Oh, and Linux-branded zones only work on x86/64 systems. Solaris 10 though as a non-global zone works on any S10 host OS.

T61 XP-pro Microsoft file and printer sharing unchecks on Intel(R) 82566M NIC after reboot

I check Microsoft file and printer sharing but after reboot it is unchecked for Intel(R) 82566M NIC connection profile.
Anyone else seen this or fixed?
Message Edited by jbaaremartin on 07-18-2008 11:11 PM
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Problem was setting in security section for the profile in Thinkvantage Access Connections; it was set to cancel Microsoft File and Printer sharing.

Intel i217-LM NIC Causes Broadcast storm and High CPU

Wanted to post this here to help others that may be experiencing issues with broadcasts.
If you have PC's with the Intel i217-LM NIC if you don't have the latest driver from Intel the NIC will cause an IPV6 broadcast storm when the computer goes into sleep/hibernate. You have to have at least two PC's on your network in sleep/hibernate mode. It causes the same affect as a network loop. In my network it would cause the MDF CPU to go to 100% and basically shut the network down.
We have Lenovo M93 desktops that have this NIC and I know that there are other PC's that have his same NIC and experience the same problem.
When the broadcast storm is happening you can issue the command
show interfaces | include is up|line|broadcast on your MDF switch to find which interfaces have high broadcasts. You may have to trace it through your uplinks to your IDF's. You can then shut those interfaces to stop the broadcast storm.
Your long term solution will be to get the latest NIC driver from Intel and update your PC's.

It's connected IPV4 but because of the faulty NIC driver it starts broadcasting IPV6 when in sleep/hibernate mode.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12291431/ipv6-broadcast-storm-caused-hp-eliteone-800-intel-i217-lm-nic-how-find-hosts
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/A-M-and-Edge-Series-ThinkCentre/M83-and-M93p-ipv6-storms-intel-i217-LM-NIC/td-p/1600686

Compare Solaris based processor and Intel processor for EBS

We are planning to migrate our 9i database and Application(11.5.10.2) from Solaris to Linux.
Also planning for some major hardware changes.
We want to compare sparc V9 processors and Intel Processor.
Please let us know any documentation which compares both processors
- Bench marck for Solaris and Inter processors
- Any calculation like 1 Inter processor = n Solaris based processor
- Any other related topics .
Thanks
TT

Hi,
Please see the links referenced in the following threads.
Hardware for Oracle E-Biz R12(12.0.4)
Hardware for Oracle E-Biz R12(12.0.4)
Hardware requirements for Oracle APPS
Hardware requirements for Oracle APPS
Question Regarding R12
http://forums.tangosol.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=861380
Sizing..
Re: Sizing..
Regards,
Hussein

M83 and M93p ipv6 storms intel i217-LM NIC

The Intel i217-LM NIC in some new lenovo devices will create massive IPv6 listener discovery spam when the machine sleeps, hibernates, or is turned off. This can be resolved by using the 19.0 or later driver from intel (currently 19.1). The officially supported driver provided by Lenovo is older than 19.0 and causes network storms. Highly recommend that Lenovo bump up their supported version and anyone using this NIC on a production network update their driver from Intel's website.
This problem only seems to occur if there are 2 or more machines with this NIC on the same network that are in a sleep, hibernate, or off state (off but plugged in).
This is also a problem for T440 machines, probably others as well.

It's connected IPV4 but because of the faulty NIC driver it starts broadcasting IPV6 when in sleep/hibernate mode.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12291431/ipv6-broadcast-storm-caused-hp-eliteone-800-intel-i217-lm-nic-how-find-hosts
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/A-M-and-Edge-Series-ThinkCentre/M83-and-M93p-ipv6-storms-intel-i217-LM-NIC/td-p/1600686

Oracle 8.1.5 and Solaris v7 for Intel

Does anyone know if Oracle 8i (8.1.5) will work on Solaris v7
for Intel. Don't laugh...I know these are old versions but if
they will work I would like to know.

Does anyone know if Oracle 8i (8.1.5) will work on Solaris v7
for Intel. Don't laugh...I know these are old versions but if
they will work I would like to know.

How to configure Intel pci8086,109a Network dapter

hi folks, a sI'm totally new to Solaris 10 so I can use lots of help PLEASE.
After installing Solaris 10 11/06 on Dell 9150, there's NO internet connectivity.
With some help I've added a line [i]pci8086,109a pci8086,109a net pci iprb.bef "Intel 10/100/1000 Network Adapter" [i]to /boot/solaris/devicedb/master and iprb "pci8086,109a" to /etc/driver_aliases and then ::devlinks & touch /reconfigure::
Still there's NO internet connectivity. Many, Many thanx in advance. -Jags

hi folks, a sI'm totally new to Solaris 10 so I can
use lots of help PLEASE.
After installing Solaris 10 11/06 on Dell 9150,
there's NO internet connectivity.
With some help I've added a line [i]pci8086,109a
pci8086,109a net pci iprb.bef "Intel 10/100/1000
Network Adapter" [i]to
/boot/solaris/devicedb/master and iprb"pci8086,109a" to /etc/driver_aliases and then
::devlinks & touch /reconfigure::
Please undo the entry in devicesdb/master. You don't need a .bef file. This was required when one used the older boot method and that too when one needed to network boot the system. With GRUB boot which available on Solaris 10 11/06 network boot is done using PXE protocol.
The problem is that Solaris does not recognize your device. The drivers are probed and attached depending on the entries available in /etc/driver_aliases. The entry the ethernet device is not in that list.
To obtain the correct entry,you would need to look at the output from prtconf -pv. Check for Intel or "Ethernet" in the output and look for the compatible properties. The entry would look something like "pci8086,1029.8086.109a". Note that actual entry should be based of the the entries from the "compatible" properties. The correct method to add an entry is use update_drv -a -i "pci8086,XXXX" Where XXXX is based on the output from prtconf -pv.
>
Still there's NO internet connectivity. Many, Many
thanx in advance. -Jags

Installation problems with Solaris 8 on Intel

Howdy,
I am having some problem with my installation of Solaris 8 on Intel. I am installing the system on a P133 (Asus TX97 motherboard). When I first start the installation and perform the system scan I get the following error:
The PnP ISA: IDE Controller programable device was unable to be programmed.
This could be caused by two possible reasons:
- Lack of resouces available
- There is a conflict with the following already-existing device: 8086,7111 - Bus Mastering IDE Controller
When I bring up the View/Edit device settings and I scroll to the IDE controller there is an ! mark beside the PCI IDE controller. The controler is specifying: Bus 0, device: 1, function: 1 port 1F0-1F7, 3F6, 170-177, 376, E000-E00F, 0 IRQ 14, 15
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to resolve this conflict? I tried removing the PCI IDE interface and then installing a ISA IDE interfact (for IRQ: 14, IRQ 15 automatically put a PnP IDE controller there). This seemed to resolve the conflict but then I received a: No Bootable devices have been found.
If anyone can help out with how to resolve the conflict, or what the No Bootable Devices have been found error it would be greatly appreciated.
Currently there is a partition set up with NT on it, but I wish to basically get rid of everything on the HD and install Solaris on it. FYI, when I check the HD's in NT it mentions I/0: 1F0-1F7 IRQ 14 and also I/O 170-177 IRQ 15.
Any help would greatly be appreciated.
Regards,
S.

When I close down Solais in the CDE I am taken back to the logon screen
and I turn the PC off.Don't do that. If you simply turn off the PC, the OS has no chance to
write back cached / modified disk data back to the HDD - this is also the
reason why solaris has to check the filesystems on the next boot and apparently
has to repair filesystem defects.
What you have to do is shutdown the machine, before you can power it off.
Login as user "root" and use the command
init 5
or
halt
"init 5" will shutdown system services, by executing commands from
/etc/rc0.d/K* with argument "stop". Then it'll sync all modified disk blocks to
the HDD, kills all remaining processes and unmounts all filesystems. In this
state it's safe to power off the machine!
"halt" is a quick-and-dirty shutdown. It does not stop system services (the
/etc/rc0.d/K* commands are not run). But, it syncs all modified disk blocks
to the HDD, kills all processes and unmounts all filesystems. "init 5" is preferred,
especially if you have services like a database server running on the machine,
which needs to be cleanly shutdown. On the other hand, with a default solaris
installation and no extra services, a simple "halt" should be OK.
Btw. if multiple users are logged in on the machine, you should also have a look
at the shutdown(1M) command. "shutdown" sends warnings to the logged in
users that the machine is about to be shut down, ...

Ultra 24 and Intel Boot Agent

I recently purchased a Sun Ultra 24, my first foray into the Intel + Solaris arena.
The machine has performed flawlessly with a number of x86 operating systems, and the BIOS has seemed rock-solid.
Yesterday, I decided that I would reduce the BIOS boot time by disabling the PXE Boot, by using the BIOS menu option to do so. Following that change, the various operating systems I've tried cannot enumerate or activate the e1000 NIC. I did attempt to re-enable the PIX option in the BIOS, although the IBA doesn't appear any longer unless I reset the defaults with ibautil from DOS. The defaults reset doesn't survive beyond a reboot (the process is: boot using CD containing DOS and the intel proboot utils, execute ibautil -all -defcfg, reboot.) At that point, the menu is present and everything is back to normal. If I again reboot, the IBA menu doesn't appear during POST/boot and I cannot get the e1000 to function an OS.
Thank you for your time, and any feedback you may be able to offer.
UPDATE: I went ahead and did something rather unorthodox: On a hunch, I invoked ibautil with the option to enable the boot menu, believing this would force invocation of the IBA and enumeration of the NIC. It does, and the NIC does display activity and link lights at the rear (which it previously wasn't doing following the disabling of IBA in the BIOS). At POST, the IBA does say that it cannot continue due to a corrupt configuration (which I can eliminate with -defcfg, even though defcfg doesn't "stick" beyond a reboot). So, the NIC is working, but I believe the root issue is in being able to access the IBA menu with the option enabled in the BIOS. The IBA menu apparently is set to disabled within the ctrl-s config menu, and with zero seconds wait, which I cannot access to change. As a result, the NIC doesn't initialize at POST, leaving it dead for all practical purposes.
If any of you know how to re-initialize the IBA ctrl-s properties so as to display ctrl-s normally without the volatile, non-lasting ibautil -defcfg, and without a BIOS update (Sun hasn't released one for this model, yet) I'd love to know how.
Thanks again, and hopefully this provides some insight into what to avoid when configuring the IBA and e1000 nic on this machine. Hopefully any answers will lead to the solution for those that have run into the issue.
Edited by: tenex on Dec 28, 2007 4:57 PM

I also have this problem, but I don't know how it happened. The machine came with Solaris 10 installed and the network interface worked fine. Then I wiped the machine and installed Solaris Express 01/08 and it worked fine. Then from the GRUB boot menu I booted to "Sun xVM Hipervisor" out of curiosity. It booted into Solaris Express, but the network was no longer available (not even listed in ifconfig -a). From that point onward this computer doesn't think it has a network card in it. I've reintalled the OS, tried Indiana builds, etc. The OS installers don't ask me network questions anymore, and people on the install-discuss (solaris) mailing list tell me that it means no network interface was detected.
From the BIOS's Advanced/Integrated Devices screen I see that "GbE Controller" is Enabled, and "GbE LAN Boot" is Enabled. When I try to access the Intel Management Engine Bios (CTRL-P at boot), it asks me for a password! I don't know what the password is, and it is not mentioned in the manual.
I don't like the idea of shipping the computer back because I'll just get an other one with the same problem. I guess it's time to call Sun and get some help.
Edited by: rdelaplante on Feb 17, 2008 4:45 AM

Solaris 10 and LSI MegaRaid 320 problem

I have problem with installation of Solaris 10 on LSI MegaRaid 320 SCSI controller....
Driver which in the solaris is SUNWlsimega and has VERSION: 11.10.0,REV=2005.09.15.00.24 and contains path
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-122829-02-1
Driver at http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=431fd1be
has VERSION=11.10.0,REV=2005.08.08.12.43
and during install process always freeze at 97%....
how can i make floppy disk image with the latest driver or how can i set up driver from Solaris DVD?

Dear Sun manager!
Our competitors OS and their distributives - freeBSD and mandrake have a nice Support and a very advantages - complires an development tools!
I setup Solaris 10 systems on the IDE HDD - but thos is a first and last experiments with Solaris 10
I think that many users GNU OS and software take a high rate our " High support level"!
Good Luck

Solaris 9 and Intel 8086,109a nics

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for