Solaris 9 upgrade do 10 - zfs problem

Hi,
I have solaris 9 on x86 server, which was upgrade to solaris 10 and ufs was upgrade to zfs, now when the system is rebooting or shutdown, I have problem with mount some disk resource, e.g
rpool/some/foo /local/foo, but is mouting as legacy, what does mean the directory /local/foo isn't empty, but it's empty. Everything is ok when I mount manualy "zfs set mountpoint=/local/foo rpool/some/foo
Somebody have similar problem? On this server work solaris 10 05/09 version.

ZFS filesystems mount as legacy if their mounted via vfstab rather than the ZFS mountpoint options.
So check that the filesystem isnt mentioned in /etc/vfstab.

Similar Messages

  • Solaris 10 upgrade - Major problems - PLEASE HELP

    I have a v880 running Solaris 10 11/06 (U3) which I am trying to upgrade to the latest Solaris 8/11 (U10) release without much success. I am simply using the Solaris Installation Program and booting from DVD and running the upgrade option. However the process fails with the following error:
    The selected Software exceeds the available disk space.
    The Solaris operating environment selected to upgrade contains
    a metadevice. Disk Space Re-allocation is not allowed.
    Please do one of the following:
    Deselect some software to be installed.
    Choose another version of Solaris to upgrade. (If available)
    Go back and select Initial Install.
    Exit the installation.<Press ENTER to continue>
    A df -h shows that / has 22Gb free, swap space is 3.1Gb free, /var has 7.1Gb free and /usr 3.1Gb free. All the documentation seems to show that that is ample space. I'm relatively new to Unix and Solaris so be gentle with me if I'm doing something stupid. Many thanks to all. An initial install is not an option as I need to keep the setup as is.

    It's probably /usr that it's whining about. It's not very exact when calculating space and 3.1G is not ample space these days. This is why I put everything in the / partition anymore. Don't have to worry about this crap down the line...
    You might try copying some stuff off of /usr (if you can find it) and try again.

  • Lucreate error on Solaris 10 10/09 root ZFS

    Hi guys,
    I got some errors while trying out live upgrade on Solaris 10 10/09 root ZFS x86 environment.
    I do intent to do this in the SPARC environment but not comfortable with the experience so far.
    First of all, I have a separate zpool dataset - "rpool/opt".
    Not sure if this is causing the error below.
    Anyone can help to advice? TIA
    bash-3.00# lucreate -c zfsBE -n new-zfsBE
    Checking GRUB menu...
    Analyzing system configuration.
    No name for current boot environment.
    Current boot environment is named <zfsBE>.
    Creating initial configuration for primary boot environment <zfsBE>.
    The device </dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0> is not a root device for any boot environment; cannot get BE ID.
    PBE configuration successful: PBE name <zfsBE> PBE Boot Device </dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0>.
    Comparing source boot environment <zfsBE> file systems with the file
    system(s) you specified for the new boot environment. Determining which
    file systems should be in the new boot environment.
    Updating boot environment description database on all BEs.
    Updating system configuration files.
    Creating configuration for boot environment <new-zfsBE>.
    Source boot environment is <zfsBE>.
    Creating boot environment <new-zfsBE>.
    Cloning file systems from boot environment <zfsBE> to create boot environment <new-zfsBE>.
    Creating snapshot for <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u8wos_08a> on <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u8wos_08a@new-zfsBE>.
    Creating clone for <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u8wos_08a@new-zfsBE> on <rpool/ROOT/new-zfsBE>.
    Setting canmount=noauto for </> in zone <global> on <rpool/ROOT/new-zfsBE>.
    ERROR: cannot open '              ': dataset does not exist
    ERROR: cannot mount mount point </.alt.tmp.b-UB.mnt/opt> device <              >
    ERROR: failed to mount file system <              > on </.alt.tmp.b-UB.mnt/opt>
    ERROR: unmounting partially mounted boot environment file systems
    ERROR: cannot mount boot environment by icf file </etc/lu/ICF.2>
    ERROR: Unable to mount ABE <new-zfsBE>
    ERROR: Unable to clone the existing file systems from boot environment <zfsBE> to create boot environment <new-zfsBE>.
    ERROR: Cannot make file systems for boot environment <new-zfsBE>.
    bash-3.00#
    bash-3.00# df -h
    Filesystem             size   used  avail capacity  Mounted on
    rpool/ROOT/s10x_u8wos_08a
                           9.8G   3.2G   5.0G    40%    /
    /devices                 0K     0K     0K     0%    /devices
    ctfs                     0K     0K     0K     0%    /system/contract
    proc                     0K     0K     0K     0%    /proc
    mnttab                   0K     0K     0K     0%    /etc/mnttab
    swap                   613M   384K   613M     1%    /etc/svc/volatile
    objfs                    0K     0K     0K     0%    /system/object
    sharefs                  0K     0K     0K     0%    /etc/dfs/sharetab
    /usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap1.so.1
                           8.1G   3.2G   5.0G    40%    /lib/libc.so.1
    fd                       0K     0K     0K     0%    /dev/fd
    swap                   613M    40K   613M     1%    /tmp
    swap                   613M    32K   613M     1%    /var/run
    rpool/opt              3.0G   409M   2.6G    14%    /opt
    rpool                  9.8G    34K   5.0G     1%    /rpool
    /hgfs                   16G   4.0M    16G     1%    /hgfs
    rpool/ROOT/new-zfsBE   9.8G   3.2G   5.0G    40%    /.alt.tmp.b-UB.mnt
    bash-3.00#
    bash-3.00# ludelete new-zfsBE
    WARNING: Boot environment <new-zfsBE> has one or more file systems mounted at </.alt.tmp.b-UB.mnt>.
    Checking if last BE on any disk...
    cat: cannot open /tmp/.lulib.luclb.dsk.1801.new-zfsBE
    BE <new-zfsBE> is not the last BE on any disk.
    No entry for BE <new-zfsBE> in GRUB menu
    ERROR: Unable to unmount file systems for boot environment <new-zfsBE>.
    Unable to delete boot environment.
    bash-3.00#

    I had the exact same problem.
    I found that by simply renaming rpool/opt to rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b/opt seemed to fix this problem:
    $ umount -f /opt
    $ zfs rename rpool/opt rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b/opt
    $ zfs set canmount=noauto rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b/opt
    $ zfs mount rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b/opt
    $ lucreate -n test
    Analyzing system configuration.
    Comparing source boot environment <s10x_u6wos_07b> file systems with the file
    system(s) you specified for the new boot environment. Determining which
    file systems should be in the new boot environment.
    Updating boot environment description database on all BEs.
    Updating system configuration files.
    Creating configuration for boot environment <test>.
    Source boot environment is <s10x_u6wos_07b>.
    Creating boot environment <test>.
    Cloning file systems from boot environment <s10x_u6wos_07b> to create boot environment <test>.
    Creating snapshot for <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b> on <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b@test>.
    Creating clone for <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b@test> on <rpool/ROOT/test>.
    Setting canmount=noauto for </> in zone <global> on <rpool/ROOT/test>.
    Creating snapshot for <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b/opt> on <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b/opt@test>.
    Creating clone for <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b/opt@test> on <rpool/ROOT/test/opt>.
    Setting canmount=noauto for </opt> in zone <global> on <rpool/ROOT/test/opt>.
    Creating snapshot for <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b/var> on <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b/var@test>.
    Creating clone for <rpool/ROOT/s10x_u6wos_07b/var@test> on <rpool/ROOT/test/var>.
    Setting canmount=noauto for </var> in zone <global> on <rpool/ROOT/test/var>.
    WARNING: split filesystem </> file system type <zfs> cannot inherit
    mount point options <-> from parent filesystem </> file
    type <-> because the two file systems have different types.
    Population of boot environment <test> successful.
    Creation of boot environment <test> successful.Don't know what the downstream implications of doing this will be, but it seems to work.

  • Sun Solaris 10,Upgrade 8 or higher,having issues with VxFS,for Oracle 11gr2

    A while ago, we tried doing a prototype upgrade of our main Oracle 10g db to Oracle 11gr2.
    The OS on which our Oracle 10g is running is Sun Solaris 10, upgrade 4.
    According to Oracle 11gr2 documentation, we need Sun Solaris 10, upgrade 6 or higher for Oracle 11g2.
    The filesystem we are using is VxFS, Veritas File System.
    According to our system administrator, we had issues , making Sun Solar 10, upgrade 8 , work with the VxFS filesystem.
    I was wondering if anybody is running Oracle 11g2 on Sun Solaris 10 upgrade 6 or higher with VxFS file system.
    At present, our Oracle db upgrade project is on a hold, because of the above issue. So your help on this , can really help us in figuring out if there is an issue between VxFS filesystem and Sun Solaris 10 OS.
    Thanks
    Ashish

    Hi Ashish,
    We are not running Veritas Cluster file system.
    We tried moving our Oracle 10g r2 db on ZFS ,before doing the upgrade and performance on ZFS was worst.
    ZFS has certain memory parameter setting. If you did not configure that then ZFS will eat your complete system memory.
    My system administrator, has gotten a copy of Solaris 10 upgrade 9 and will try that with VxFS.
    I was curious to find out if folks are running Oracle 11g on Sun Solaris 10 with VxFS file system and if they had experienced any issue.If you can Install Vxfs on Oracle Soalris 10 U9, then according to me there sholudn't be any limitations for an oracle database.
    Recently i installed Oracle database 11.2.0.2 on one of my test server. I have created two databases - one on ZFS and another on ASM.
    Refer:
    http://appsdbaworkshop.blogspot.com/2010/10/installation-of-11202-on-oracle-solaris.html
    We dont have any performance issues. We are testing it for the performance benchmarks on both of the filesystem.
    If you can Install Vxfs on Oracle Soalris 10 U9, then according to me there sholudn't be any limitations for an oracle database.
    Regards,
    X A H E E R

  • How does one update Flash? I currently cannot watch videos on You Tube, it says I need to upgrade, I have no problem doing this on a PC.

    How does one update Flash? I currently cannot watch videos on You Tube, it says I need to upgrade, I have no problem doing this on a PC.

    If you're not using chrome you can just go to adobe's website (http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/) and download the newest flash player.  You run the .dmg and then open the application, which updates flash.  With the latest version of flash there should be a preference pane within system preferences to allow you to change settings and check for updates.

  • I run Tiger OSX on one MacBook and SnowLeopard on another. Photos were downloaded from Tiger to SnowLeopard, and now iPhoto won't open on the Tiger Mac. Will upgrading iPhoto fix this problem?

    I run Tiger OSX on one MacBook and SnowLeopard on another. Photos were downloaded from Tiger to SnowLeopard, and now iPhoto won't open on the Tiger Mac. Will upgrading iPhoto fix this problem?

    What matters is the version of iPhoto you have on the different machines. Can you tell us what they are, and what exact error message you get.
    Regards
    TD

  • 7.01 to 7.3 Upgrade - Logon Screen - "Logon Problems? Get Support" occuring

    Hi
    We have upgrade our ABAP and JAVA stacks from NW 7.01 to NW 7.3.
    After the upgrade is the "Logon Problems? Get Support" occuring on our portals logon screen. In 7.01 this was controlled with the parameter ume.logon.logon_help - however after the upgrade we do not see this parameter anymore.
    Screen dump (requires a couple of clicks)
    http://www.filefactory.com/file/c26d20b/n/Portal_Logon_Page_Issue.jpg
    Any idea about how we remove the "Logon Problems? Get Support" part?
    Thanks and kind regards,
    Torben

    Hi Torben,
    On my fresh 7.3 installation, everything is clean and ... fresh ...
    So, for example, the built in group AnonUsers only has the user Guest as it's solely relation (no parent, no child groups); the guest user has the Guest role, which has (via it's groups) roles Everyone and Guest; onbly the role Everyone as got UME actions.
    All together, this sounds much like an upgrade issue (on my fresh 7.3, there is no group "J2EE_GUEST" at all).
    Two possibilities to go:
    - Open an OSS message (should be done in any case probably, to report this issue to SAP, so that this can be fixed);
    - Check the UME consistenty by yourself (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/44/aecb4253217037e10000000a422035/frameset.htm)
    Maybe the second point already will fix some things; would be great for you, anyhow, I still would advise to report this issue officially to SAP.
    Hope it helps
    Detlev

  • After upgraded ios6 i got problem with whatapp. "last seen" function is not working

    HI eveyone
    after upgraded ios6 i got problem with whatapp. "last seen" function is not working .. it's doest show last seen who enter the chat . is anyone have the same problem .. i even restore and reinstall to my ph but it's  not work .. if someone know how to fix it, plz tell me how to do .. thanks

    Also, when I check this post several times a day, I always see warning 'Connection is untrust'. If I close browser and reopen immediately everything is ok.

  • Solaris 2.7 to Solaris 8 Upgrade

    Hi, I'm attemting to upgrade Solaris 2.7 (11/99) to Solaris 8 (1/01) in a Sun E450 and I get an error. Now I describe the steps that I follow:
    - I insert the CD 1 of 2 of Solaris Software 8 (1/01) and I do an Stop+A with "boot cdrom"
    - We insert geographical region, the network configuration...
    - When it asks for an Actual or Initial installation I select Actual and it shows something like this:
    " The version of Solaris (solaris 2.7) of the segment c0t0d0s0 can't upgrade.
    Fsck can't verify a system archives in the archives system table (vfstab)"
    I verified from console that c0t0d0s0 is mounted in "a/" and then I've done an fsck and the partition not contents any errors
    This is my "vfstab":
    #device          device          mount          FS     fsck     mount     mount
    #to mount     to fsck          point          type     pass     at boot     options
    #/dev/dsk/c1d0s2 /dev/rdsk/c1d0s2 /usr          ufs     1     yes     -
    fd     -     /dev/fd     fd     -     no     -
    /proc     -     /proc     proc     -     no     -
    /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s1     -     -     swap     -     no     -
    /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0     /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0     /     ufs     1     no     logging,noatime
    /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s3     /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s3     /var     ufs     1     no     logging,noatime
    /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s4     /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s4     /opt     ufs     2     yes     logging,noatime
    /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7     /dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s7     /home     vxfs     2     yes     -
    /dev/dsk/c6t0d1s0     /dev/rdsk/c6t0d1s0     /programas     vxfs     3     yes     -
    swap     -     /tmp     tmpfs     -     yes     -
    /dev/dsk/c7t1d0s0 /dev/rdsk/c7t1d0s0 /imagen vxfs 3 yes -
    /dev/dsk/c7t1d2s0 /dev/rdsk/c7t1d2s0 /imagen2 vxfs 3 yes -
    /dev/dsk/c6t0d3s0 /dev/rdsk/c6t0d3s0 /imagen3 vxfs 3 yes -
    and this is the output of an mount command:
    proc on /proc read/write/setuid on Wed Jan 28 17:50:21 2004
    / on /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 read/write/setuid/logging/noatime/largefiles on Wed Jan 4
    /dev/fd on fd read/write/setuid on Wed Jan 28 17:50:21 2004
    /var on /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s3 read/write/setuid/logging/noatime/largefiles on Wed J4
    /opt on /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s4 read/write/setuid/largefiles/noatime/logging on Wed J4
    /home on /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7 read/write/setuid/log on Wed Jan 28 17:50:24 2004
    /programas on /dev/dsk/c6t0d1s0 read/write/setuid/log on Wed Jan 28 17:50:24 204
    /tmp on swap read/write/setuid on Wed Jan 28 17:50:24 2004
    /imagen on /dev/dsk/c7t1d0s0 read/write/setuid/log on Wed Jan 28 17:50:24 2004
    /imagen2 on /dev/dsk/c7t1d2s0 read/write/setuid/log on Wed Jan 28 17:50:24 2004
    /imagen3 on /dev/dsk/c6t0d3s0 read/write/setuid/log on Wed Jan 28 17:50:25 2004
    and the "mnttab" file:
    /proc     /proc     proc     rw,suid,dev=2f80000     1075308621
    /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0     /     ufs     rw,suid,dev=800000,logging,noatime,largefiles     1075308621
    fd     /dev/fd     fd     rw,suid,dev=3040000     1075308621
    /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s3     /var     ufs     rw,suid,dev=800003,logging,noatime,largefiles     1075308621
    /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s4     /opt     ufs     largefiles,noatime,logging,dev=800004     1075308624
    /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s7     /home     vxfs     rw,log,suid     1075308624
    /dev/dsk/c6t0d1s0     /programas     vxfs     rw,log,suid     1075308624
    swap     /tmp     tmpfs     rw,dev=1     1075308624
    /dev/dsk/c7t1d0s0     /imagen     vxfs     rw,log,suid     1075308624
    /dev/dsk/c7t1d2s0     /imagen2     vxfs     rw,log,suid     1075308624
    /dev/dsk/c6t0d3s0     /imagen3     vxfs     rw,log,suid     1075308625
    -hosts     /net     autofs     ignore,indirect,nosuid,nobrowse,dev=31c0001     1075308629
    -xfn     /xfn     autofs     ignore,indirect,dev=31c0002     1075308629
    eusleg01:vold(pid345)     /vol     nfs     ignore,noquota,dev=3180001     1075308639
    I've done the same steps with a Sun E250 and the result is Ok , Solaris is upgraded ok to version 8
    I need urgent help :(
    Thanks

    http://supportforum.sun.com/sunos/index.php?t=tree&th=673&start=0&rid=27&S=801555a93d24e3464fa33b5a32e88894

  • Websphere 4.0.4 crash on heavy load after solaris 8 upgrade

    We have our application running on solaris 8 with websphere 4.0.4 and IBM HTTP Server. Things seem to be fine since one year. We recetly went with a solaris patch upgrade (may 2005) applying
    108528-29 SunOS 5.8: kernel update and Apache patch
    116973-01 SunOS 5.8: Apache Patch
    Since than websphere is crashing with the following error
    java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
    at java.lang.Thread.start(Native Method)
    at com.ibm.ws.util.CachedThread.start(ThreadPool.java:126)
    at com.ibm.ws.util.CachedThread.wakeup(ThreadPool.java:111)
    at com.ibm.ws.util.ThreadPool.getThread(ThreadPool.java:453)
    at com.ibm.ejs.oa.pool.ThreadPool.startWorkerThread(ThreadPool.java:83)
    at com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.IIOPConnection.processInput(IIOPConnection.java:879)
    at com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.StandardReaderThread.run(StandardReaderThread.java:187)
    libthread panic: cannot create new lwp : dumping core (PID: 7313 LWP 2)
    stacktrace:
    ff361c90
    0
    Not sure if the solaris patch has caused it.
    Any suggestions will be very helpful.
    Thanks,
    Praveen

    No specific ideas but take a look at this trouble-shooting article.
    You could try trashing the preferences again as described in it and if that does no good it might be worth uninstalling it exactly as described and reinstalling .
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TA24195?viewlocale=enUS&locale=enUS

  • Unbootable Solaris 10 x86 installed on ZFS root file system

    Hi all,
    I have unbootable Solaris 10 x86 installed on ZFS root file system. on an IDE HDD
    The bios keep showing the msg
    DISK BOOT FAILURE , PLEASE INSERT SYSTEM BOOT DISK
    please note :
    1- the HDD is connected properly and recognized by the system
    2- GRUB don't show any messages
    is there any guide to recover the system , or detail procedure to boot system again
    Thanks,,,

    It's not clear if this is a recently installed system that is refusing to boot OR if the system was working fine and crashed.
    If it's the former, I would suggest you check the BIOS settings to make sure it's booting from the right hard disk. In any case, the Solaris 10 installation should have writting the GRUB stage1 and stage2 blocks to the beginning of the disk.
    If the system crashed and is refusing to boot, you can try to boot from a Solaris 10 installation DVD. Choose the single user shell option and see if it can find your system. You should be able to use format/devfsadm/etc to do the actual troubleshooting. If your disk is still responding, try a `zpool import` to see if there is any data that ZFS can recognize (it usually has many backup uberblocks and disk labels scattered around the disk).

  • Solaris cluster 3.2 with zfs failover filesystem failed. How can I recover?

    Hi all,
    I have just install and configure Solaris cluster 3.2U3 using zfs for both of root filesystem and shared storage file system.
    This cluster operate clearly. Today, I can not see the zpool for shared storage. I can see the storage volume in the output of format command.
    So all my resources change to offline status. and my application is failed.
    How can I recover this cluster??????
    is there any body can help me :(

    Have you used a SUNW.HAStoragePlus (HASP) resource to control your zpool? If not, the zpool is probably needs importing. That is what the HASP resource would do for you. You would also need a dependency from your application on the HASP resource to ensure that your application does not try to start up before the storage is avaialable.
    Regards,
    Tim
    ---

  • Solaris SPARC upgrade failing

    I am trying to apply a Solaris 10 upgrade release to my E450 server, but get the following error during the install process:
    "Could not reinitialize system state, please exit installer and try again"
    Retrying the upgrade gives the same error.
    The current release on the server is 10 1/06 and I am trying to move this on to 10 11/06.
    Anyone got any idea what it is complaining about, the upgrade process worked OK on my V480/V490 servers!.

    Obviously Sun (excuse me, Oracle) does not intend to support the solaris-10/sparc/firefox-3.6 combination. Firefox 3.6 requires the NPAPI and/or NPRuntime interfaces to java, but oracle does not provide the new "libnpjp2.so" java plugin with the jre-6u18-sparc-solaris java download.
    A search at www.oracle.com does not turn up any support announcement about this. You have to learn it the hard way. :(
    If you want to continue to use sparc-solaris, downgrade to firefox-3.5 so you can use the old libjavaplugin_oji.so module. Otherwise run Linux or Mac OS X to stay in the unix camp.

  • Solaris Live Upgrade

    I didnt find a specific place to place this topic, so maybe you can replace.
    I read a lot about Solaris Live Upgrade, but I'd would like to know if I can copy a BE from one computer to another over network via NFS.
    Or if there is another software that can make a image of my system and replace to the others computers (they are all the same), so I will dont need to configure all of them.
    Thx for any help.

    Thanks for answering.
    I read about JumpStart installation, but is it possible to install a customized image, but not with just the partition, packages and patches selected. I wanted to share a whole system configured. For example, the DNS, IP, User's account settings, etc.
    Because, I just found a way to share the installation image with the selected packages and patches. But you will need to configure the files of the packages later in the clients.
    Is it possible?

  • My iphone 5s have problems with the battery to upgrade to IOS8, the problem is that low battery level quickly since I upgraded to IOS8.

    My iphone 5s have problems with the battery to upgrade to IOS8, the problem is that low battery level quickly since I upgraded to IOS8.

    recalibrate your battery.

Maybe you are looking for