SOLR Commit (exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4)

My understanding of the following error, "exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4", when indexing collections, is that I am committing too often. I do not pass in autoCommit="no", which to me means that it committed the changes each and every time cfindex was executed. I am looping over a large collection of information, cfindexing with each loop. If I do pass in autoCommit="no", when and how do I commit those changes? Can I place a "cfindex autoCommit='yes'" after the loop has finished to commit all those changes? What is the best way to do this?

You should use "MAXCORRUPT" option in rman.
For more details about this error and solutiones, please check:
http://heliosguneserol.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/ora-19566-exceeded-limit-of-0-corrupt-blocks/
http://arjudba.blogspot.com.es/2008/05/ora-19566-exceeded-limit-of-0-corrupt.html
http://www.runningoracle.com/product_info.php?products_id=397

Similar Messages

My iTunes Match won't load past step 1; All songs in my library say "Exceeded Limit", even the ones that were uploaded before.

My iTunes Match hasn't been working for a couple of days. It said I had exceeded the song limit, so I was going through my library and clearing out some songs. When I deleted the songs, the box that asked if I wanted to delete them from the cloud wasn't showing up. I decided to update my iTunes Match before deleting anything else. When I attempted the update, Step 1 moved incredibly slowly, then stopped working before reaching Step 2. When this has happened in the past, I have been advised to try several troubleshooting tactics from the support forum and from writing to Apple support in the past. The first one is to turn off iTunes Match, restart the computer, and turn on iTunes Match again. I did that. The same problem occurred. I tried the second trouble shooting tactic, which was to turn off iTunes Match, close iTunes, find the iTunes Library Genius.itdb and iTunes Library Extras.itdb and move them to the trash, then run a Repair Disk Permissions using Disk Utility, then turn iTunes Match back on. I tried that. The same problem occurred. I went to my iTunes library to see the iCloud status of my songs, and every single song was listed as not being in the cloud yet and had the "Exceeded Limit" status, even the songs that have been in my cloud for over a year. I checked a few of the forum topics here on the support site. One suggested opening up iTunes while holding down the Option button, creating a new library, then turning on iTunes Match and deleting songs from the cloud that way. Then open up the original library and turn on iTunes Match. I did that. The status of my songs hasn't changed, nor can iTunes Match load past Step 1. Does anyone know what I can do to fix this?

Maybe I didn't explain it properly, but that's one of the things I described trying in my first post. It helped get songs out of my cloud that I didn't need there, but iTunes Match still couldn't get past the first step. Last night I deleted the iTunes Library Extras.itdb, iTunes library Genius.itdb, iTunes Library.it, and iTunes Library.xml files from my computer, entered Time Machine, and recovered those same files that had been backed up after the last time I added music (the time the problem began.) After recovering those files I opened iTunes and turned Match back on. For some reason, it worked, even though those were the files that existed when the problem initially occurred.The combination of having songs removed from the cloud as well as restoring those original files must have done something, but I have no idea why that fixed the problem.

ORA-19566: exceeded limit of 999 corrupt blocks for file

Hi All,
I am new to Oracle RMAN & RAC Administration. Looking for your support to solve the below issue.
We have 2 disk groups - +ETDATA & +ETFLASH in our 3 node RAC environments in which RMAN is configured in node-2 to take backup. We do not have RMAN catalog and the RMAN is fetching information from control file.
Recently, the backup failed with the error ORA-19566: exceeded limit of 999 corrupt blocks for file +ETFLASH/datafile/users.6187.802328091.
We found that the datafiles are present in both disk groups and from the control file info, we got to know that the datafiles in +ETDATA are currently in use and +ETFLASH is having old datafiles.
RMAN> show all;
RMAN configuration parameters for database with db_unique_name LABWRKT are:
CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO RECOVERY WINDOW OF 3 DAYS;
CONFIGURE BACKUP OPTIMIZATION ON;
CONFIGURE DEFAULT DEVICE TYPE TO DISK; # default
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP ON;
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO '%F'; # default
CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE DISK PARALLELISM 4 BACKUP TYPE TO BACKUPSET;
CONFIGURE DATAFILE BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG BACKUP COPIES FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO 1; # default
CONFIGURE MAXSETSIZE TO UNLIMITED; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION FOR DATABASE OFF; # default
CONFIGURE ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM 'AES128'; # default
CONFIGURE COMPRESSION ALGORITHM 'BASIC' AS OF RELEASE 'DEFAULT' OPTIMIZE FOR LOAD TRUE ; # default
CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY TO NONE; # default
CONFIGURE SNAPSHOT CONTROLFILE NAME TO '+ETFLASH/CONTROLFILE/snapcf_LABWRKT.f';
CONFIGURE SNAPSHOT CONTROLFILE NAME TO '+ETFLASH/controlfile/snapcf_labwrkt.f';
Above configuration shows that SNAPSHOT CONTROLFILE is pointing to +ETFLASH. So I changed the configuration with the SNAPSHOT CONTROLFILE points to '+ETDATA/controlfile/snapcf_labwrkt.f'. At the end of backup, SNAPSHOT file was created in +ETDATA and I was expecting it to be the copy of control file being used which has dbf located in +ETDATA. But still the backup was pointing to old datafiles in +ETFLASH. Since we dont have RMAN catalog, resync also is not possible.
When I ran it manually, it was successfull without any error and was pointing to the exisiting datafiles.
RMAN> backup database plus archivelog all;
I hope the issue will get resolved if the RMAN points only to the datafiles present in +ETDATA. If I am correct, please let me know how can i make it possible? Also please explain me why the newly created snapshot file does not reflect the existing control file info?

Hi,
I am getting an error from the DBA Planning Calendar every time the job ...
So when was your last successfull backup of this datafile. Check if still available.
If this is some time ago, and may be you are currently without any backup, try to backup without rman at once,
to have at least something to work with in case you get additional errors right now.
Then you need to find out what object is affected. You are on the right way already. You need the statement,
that goes to dba_extents to check what object the block belongs to.
Has the DB been recovered recently, so the block might possibly belong to an index created with nologging ?
(this could be the case on BW systems).
If the last good backup of that file is still available and the redologs belonging to this backup up to current time are as well, you could try to recover that file. But I'd do this only after a good backup without rman and by not destroying the original file.
If the last good backup was an rman backup, you can do a verify restore of that datafile in advance, to check if the corruption is really not inside the file to be restored.
Check out the -w (verify) option of brrestore first, to understand how it works.
(I am not sure it this is already available in version 7.00, may be you need to switch to 7.10 or 7.20)
brrestore -c -m /oracle/SHD/sapdata4/sr3_16/sr3.data16 -b xxxxxxxx.ffr -w only_rmv
You should do a dbv check of that file as well, to check if it gets more information. I.E if more blocks are
affected. rman stops right after the first corruption, but usually you have a couple of those in line, esp. if these are
zeroed ones. (This one would also work with version 7.00 brtools)
brbackup -c -u / -t online -m /oracle/SHD/sapdata4/sr3_16/sr3.data16 -w only_dbv
Good luck.
Volker

ORA-19566: exceeded limit of 0 corrupt blocks

Hi All,
We have been encountering some issues with RMAN backup; it has been erroring out with same errors (max corrupt blocks). As of now, I ran the db verify for affected files and found that indexes are failing. When I tried to find out the indexes from extent views, I was unable to find it. Looks like these blocks are in free space as I found it and also the V$backup corruption view shows the logical corruption.
Waiting for you suggestion....
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.3.0 Production
TNS for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
RMAN LOG:
channel a3: starting piece 1 at 14-DEC-09
RMAN-03009: failure of backup command on a2 channel at 12/14/2009 05:43:42
ORA-19566: exceeded limit of 0 corrupt blocks for file /ub834/oradata/TERP/applsysd142.dbf
continuing other job steps, job failed will not be re-run
channel a2: starting incremental level 0 datafile backupset
channel a2: specifying datafile(s) in backupset
including current control file in backupset
channel a2: starting piece 1 at 14-DEC-09
channel a1: finished piece 1 at 14-DEC-09
piece handle=TERP_1769708180_level0_292_1_1_20091213065437.rmn tag=TAG20091213T065459 comment=API Version 2.0,MMS Version 5.0.0.0
channel a1: backup set complete, elapsed time: 01:14:45
channel a2: finished piece 1 at 14-DEC-09
piece handle=TERP_1769708180_level0_296_1_1_20091213065437.rmn tag=TAG20091213T065459 comment=API Version 2.0,MMS Version 5.0.0.0
channel a2: backup set complete, elapsed time: 00:24:54
RMAN-03009: failure of backup command on a4 channel at 12/14/2009 06:14:33
ORA-19566: exceeded limit of 0 corrupt blocks for file /ub834/oradata/TERP/applsysd143.dbf
continuing other job steps, job failed will not be re-run
released channel: a1
released channel: a2
released channel: a3
released channel: a4
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03009: failure of backup command on a3 channel at 12/14/2009 06:41:00
ORA-19566: exceeded limit of 0 corrupt blocks for file /ub806/oradata/TERP/icxd01.dbf
Recovery Manager complete.
Thanks,
Vimlendu
Edited by: Vimlendu on Dec 20, 2009 10:27 AM

dbv file=/ora/oradata/binadb/RAT_TRANS_IDX01.dbf blocksize=8192
The result:
DBVERIFY: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Thu Nov 20 11:14:01 2003
(c) Copyright 2000 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
DBVERIFY - Verification starting : FILE =
/ora/oradata/binadb/RAT_TRANS_IDX01.dbf
Block Checking: DBA = 75520968, Block Type = KTB-managed data block
**** row 80: key out of order
---- end index block validation
Page 23496 failed with check code 6401
DBVERIFY - Verification complete
Total Pages Examined : 34560
Total Pages Processed (Data) : 1
Total Pages Failing (Data) : 0
Total Pages Processed (Index): 31084
Total Pages Failing (Index): 1
Total Pages Processed (Other): 191
Total Pages Empty : 3284
Total Pages Marked Corrupt : 0
Total Pages Influx : 0
Seems like I have 1 page failing. I try to run this script:
select segment_type, segment_name, owner
from sys.dba_extents
where file_id = 18 and 23496 between block_id
and block_id + blocks - 1;
No rows returned.
Then, I try to run this script:
Select tablespace_name, file_id, block_id, bytes
from dba_free_space
where file_id = 18
and 23496 between block_id and block_id + blocks - 1
Resulting 1 row.
Seems like I have the possible corrupt block on unused space.
Edited by: Vimlendu on Dec 20, 2009 2:30 PM
Edited by: Vimlendu on Dec 20, 2009 2:41 PM

Project duration exceeds limit

hey,
I made a movie in iMovie and exported it to iDVD. After the export process it says "project duration exceeds limit".
My movie is 82 min long and 4.35 GB. Why can it not be burned onto a 4.7GB DVD???
is there a possibility to burn it onto 2 different DVDs, because I do not want to loose any quality.
thanks in advance
Thomas

Possibly you set the wrong encoding setting:
iDVD encoding settings:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=iDVD/7.0/en/11417.html
Short version:
Best Performance is for videos of up to 60 minutes
Best Quality is for videos of up to 120 minutes
Professional Quality is also for up to 120 minutes but even higher quality (and takes much longer)
That was for single-layer DVDs. Double these numbers for dual-layer DVDs.
Professional Quality: The Professional Quality option uses advanced technology to encode your video, resulting in the best quality of video possible on your burned DVD. You can select this option regardless of your project’s duration (up to 2 hours of video for a single-layer disc and 4 hours for a double-layer disc). Because Professional Quality encoding is time-consuming (requiring about twice as much time to encode a project as the High Quality option, for example) choose it only if you are not concerned about the time taken.
In both cases the maximum length includes titles, transitions and effects etc. Allow about 15 minutes for these.
You can use the amount of video in your project as a rough determination of which method to choose. If your project has an hour or less of video (for a single-layer disc), choose Best Performance. If it has between 1 and 2 hours of video (for a single-layer disc), choose High Quality. If you want the best possible encoding quality for projects that are up to 2 hours (for a single-layer disc), choose Professional Quality. This option takes about twice as long as the High Quality option, so select it only if time is not an issue for you.
Use the Capacity meter in the Project Info window (choose Project > Project Info) to determine how many minutes of video your project contains.
NOTE: With the Best Performance setting, you can turn background encoding off by choosing Advanced > “Encode in Background.” The checkmark is removed to show it’s no longer selected. Turning off background encoding can help performance if your system seems sluggish.
And whilst checking these settings in iDVD Preferences, make sure that the settings for NTSC/PAL and DV/DV Widescreen are also what you want.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1502?viewlocale=en_US

Message Content Exceeds Limit

I've had an error message: Message content exceeds limit while trying to send a 2mb video by mms. What am I doing wrong? I've sent them before and they've gone thru. HELP Please!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi and Welcome to the Forums!
Since MMS is a voice-level service from your carrier, you should contact them for assistance.
Good luck and let us know!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

#5.3.4 message header size exceeds limit

Hi !
We are getting this bounce error message from our customers trying to send emails to our newly built C370 Ironport box.
Here is the error message;
"The following message to [email protected] was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.3.0 - Other mail system problem 552 - '#5.3.4 message header size exceeds limit'"
Hope is Delivery Satus Notification will help to identify what the problem is about.
Appreciate your kind response on how to fix this issue.
Best Regards,
Ruveni

Hi Ruveni,
Please check our following knowledge base article which explains this error and provide solution for it.
Message Bounces with "552 #5.3.4 message header size exceeds limit"
http://tinyurl.com/2yw579
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Viquar
Customer Support Engineer

FullOffline Backup - ORA-19566: exceeded limit of 0 corrupt blocks for file

Dear SAP gurus,
I am getting an error from the DBA Planning Calendar every time the job for "Full Offline backup" is run. And it is always as you can see from the log on the same file "oracle/SHD/sapdata4/sr3_16/sr3.data16".
The oracle error is the following:
ORA-19566: exceeded limit of 0 corrupt blocks for file /oracle/SHD/sapdata4/sr3_16/sr3.data16
I found the SAP Note 969192 - RMAN Backup of SYSTEM tablespace terminates with ORA-19566
but it does no apply because this is for the tablespace SYSTEM and not PSAPSR3.
Please find below the log:
BR0051I BRBACKUP 7.00 (46)
BR0055I Start of database backup: begomwsv.ffd 2011-08-17 10.01.37
BR0484I BRBACKUP log file: /oracle/SHD/sapbackup/begomwsv.ffd
BR0477I Oracle pfile /oracle/SHD/102_64/dbs/initSHD.ora created from spfile /oracle/SHD/102_64/dbs/spfileSHD.ora
BR0101I Parameters
Name                           Value
oracle_sid                     SHD
oracle_home                    /oracle/SHD/102_64
oracle_profile                 /oracle/SHD/102_64/dbs/initSHD.ora
sapdata_home                   /oracle/SHD
sap_profile                    /oracle/SHD/102_64/dbs/initSHD.sap
backup_mode                    FULL
backup_type                    offline_force
backup_dev_type                disk
backup_root_dir                /mnt/backup/oracle/SHD
compress                       no
disk_copy_cmd                  rman
cpio_disk_flags                -pdcu
exec_parallel                  0
rman_compress                  no
system_info                    shdadm/orashd eccdev01 Linux 2.6.16.60-0.87.1-smp #1 SMP Wed May 11 11:48:12 UTC 2011 x86_64
oracle_info                    SHD 10.2.0.4.0 8192 17654 1114483454 eccdev01 UTF8 UTF8
sap_info                       700 SAPSR3 0002LK0003SHD0011Y01548735220015Maintenance_ORA
make_info                      linuxx86_64 OCI_102 Jan 29 2010
command_line                   brbackup -u / -jid FLLOF20110817100136 -c force -t offline_force -m full -p initSHD.sap
BR0116I ARCHIVE LOG LIST before backup for database instance SHD
Parameter                      Value
Database log mode              No Archive Mode
Automatic archival             Disabled
Archive destination            /oracle/SHD/oraarch/SHDarch
Archive format                 %t_%s_%r.dbf
Oldest online log sequence     17651
Next log sequence to archive   17654
Current log sequence           17654            SCN: 1114483454
Database block size            8192             Thread: 1
Current system change number   1114501246       ResetId: 664011854
BR0118I Tablespaces and data files
BR0202I Saving /oracle/SHD/sapdata3/sr3_15/sr3.data15
BR0203I to /mnt/backup/oracle/SHD/begomwsv/sr3.data15 ...
#FILE..... /oracle/SHD/sapdata3/sr3_15/sr3.data15
#SAVED.... /mnt/backup/oracle/SHD/begomwsv/sr3.data15 #1/15
BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2011-08-17 10.28.42
BR0063I 15 of 48 files processed - 44100.117 of 121180.346 MB done
BR0204I Percentage done: 36.39%, estimated end time: 11:15
BR0001I ******************________________________________
BR0202I Saving /oracle/SHD/sapdata4/sr3_16/sr3.data16
BR0203I to /mnt/backup/oracle/SHD/begomwsv/sr3.data16 ...
BR0278E Command output of 'SHELL=/bin/sh /oracle/SHD/102_64/bin/rman nocatalog':
Recovery Manager: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Aug 17 10:28:42 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
RMAN>
RMAN> connect target *
connected to target database: SHD (DBID=1683093070, not open)
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
RMAN> *end-of-file*
RMAN>
host command complete
RMAN> 2> 3> 4> 5> 6>
allocated channel: dsk
channel dsk: sid=223 devtype=DISK
executing command: SET NOCFAU
Starting backup at 17-AUG-11
channel dsk: starting datafile copy
input datafile fno=00019 name=/oracle/SHD/sapdata4/sr3_16/sr3.data16
released channel: dsk
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03009: failure of backup command on dsk channel at 08/17/2011 10:30:30
ORA-19566: exceeded limit of 0 corrupt blocks for file /oracle/SHD/sapdata4/sr3_16/sr3.data16
RMAN>
Recovery Manager complete.
BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2011-08-17 10.30.30
BR0279E Return code from 'SHELL=/bin/sh /oracle/SHD/102_64/bin/rman nocatalog': 1
BR0536E RMAN call for database instance SHD failed
BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2011-08-17 10.30.30
BR0506E Full database backup (level 0) using RMAN failed
BR0222E Copying /oracle/SHD/sapdata4/sr3_16/sr3.data16 to/from /mnt/backup/oracle/SHD/begomwsv failed due to previous errors
BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2011-08-17 10.30.34
BR0307I Shutting down database instance SHD ...
BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2011-08-17 10.30.34
BR0308I Shutdown of database instance SHD successful
BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2011-08-17 10.30.34
BR0304I Starting and opening database instance SHD ...
BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2011-08-17 10.30.47
BR0305I Start and open of database instance SHD successful
Do you guys have any idea on how to solve this issue??
Thanks in advance, Marc

Hi,
I am getting an error from the DBA Planning Calendar every time the job ...
So when was your last successfull backup of this datafile. Check if still available.
If this is some time ago, and may be you are currently without any backup, try to backup without rman at once,
to have at least something to work with in case you get additional errors right now.
Then you need to find out what object is affected. You are on the right way already. You need the statement,
that goes to dba_extents to check what object the block belongs to.
Has the DB been recovered recently, so the block might possibly belong to an index created with nologging ?
(this could be the case on BW systems).
If the last good backup of that file is still available and the redologs belonging to this backup up to current time are as well, you could try to recover that file. But I'd do this only after a good backup without rman and by not destroying the original file.
If the last good backup was an rman backup, you can do a verify restore of that datafile in advance, to check if the corruption is really not inside the file to be restored.
Check out the -w (verify) option of brrestore first, to understand how it works.
(I am not sure it this is already available in version 7.00, may be you need to switch to 7.10 or 7.20)
brrestore -c -m /oracle/SHD/sapdata4/sr3_16/sr3.data16 -b xxxxxxxx.ffr -w only_rmv
You should do a dbv check of that file as well, to check if it gets more information. I.E if more blocks are
affected. rman stops right after the first corruption, but usually you have a couple of those in line, esp. if these are
zeroed ones. (This one would also work with version 7.00 brtools)
brbackup -c -u / -t online -m /oracle/SHD/sapdata4/sr3_16/sr3.data16 -w only_dbv
Good luck.
Volker

Why does Match list the iCloud status of iTunes purchased songs as "Exceeded Limit"?

Why does Match list the iCloud status of iTunes purchased songs as "Exceeded Limit"?

because you have loaded over 25,000 songs to the icloud library. to find out exactly what is in icloud from itunes match follow these directions to create a blank itunes library and load only the itunes match songs from icloud.
1. You will need to know the location of your iTunes library for later, the default is under music under your username. If its not there find it and remember where it is for later.
2. Then you have to exit iTunes and create a new empty library. To do this hold the option key when you open iTunes. Choose create Library on the pop up dialogue. Create the library anywhere on your system, you can delete the entire library once you have completed your iCloud changes.
3. When the library opens in iTunes it will be empty. Click on iTunes Match and click the start button. after it finishes all of the songs on your iCloud match account will be listed under music.
if you want to delete some or all songs from icloud so you can re-sync itunes match to show the songs in your current library fowwow this.
4. you can select up to 1000 at a time and delete them.
5. when you have deleted what you want, close iTunes and open again holding the option key and navigate to your original library, usually in the music folder under your username. You should be all set and can click iTunes match again and your account will be populated with the ones in your current library.
6. You can navigate to the temp library you created in finder and delete it as it is no longer needed.

I cannot send e-mail exceeded limit

I cannot send e-mail exceeded limit? What must I do? Wait a day for limit to reset?

The limit is a daily limit (see http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4863), although I'm not sure if you have to wait a full 24 hours or until midnight CST (in Cupertino, CA, where Apple is located).

Everything on iTunes showing as "Exceeded Limit", including Purchased songs

I am over the 25k limit for non-iTunes songs. On my iMac I uploaded the 25k and was comfortable that new ripped songs would not be matched into the cloud.
I had to turn iTunes Match off on my iMac for some testing. When I turned it back on, everything is showing as "Exceeded Limit", including new Purchased songs. I can't access any of my cloud songs, even those which were previously matched. I know they're still in the cloud, because I can see them from my MacBook, but I can't get at them from my iMac. How can I get my iMac to start again "cleanly" and recognise those songs that I have in the cloud that are not on my iMac?

If the songs have been changed then it will be the rights-holder/content provider that have changed them - unless they are a number of years old. But I wouldn't expect them to show as being available for download if you still have them in your library, you usually have to delete the previous download (or not having the version that was downloaded e.g. having converted it to MP3) for it show as available for download
There is nothing else that looks different between the tracks, all their other properties are the same ?

Almost all my songs are marked 'Exceeded limit' when i only have 13k songs. what does this mean?

I only have 13,ooo songs. only about 40 matched. most say Exceeded Limit and have a little dotted cloud.
does this mean they're not in the could? i have the song title listed in my phone with match on, but there is no cloud there to download it.
how do i get these songs to upload and or match?

Hi,
Try signing out of iTunes Store / match. Close iTunes. Reboot computer. Open iTunes, sign into iTunes Store the match. You will be asked to add this computer. Select this and let match go through the complete match process.
If this does not work, close iTunes and find cookie for iTunes which you will find it in safari's cookie. Delete this cookie and close safari. Reopen iTunes and turn on / update matched. You will be asked to sign in.
If this does not work, try creating a new library by holding ctrl key whilst launching iTunes. You will get a pop up box - select create new library. This will be blank. Sign into iTunes Store then match, you will be asked to add this computer.
This will now display all your music in the cloud. If you see any track with cloud status limited exceeded, delete tracks.
Now sign out and try step one again.
Jim

Can't send mail due to exceed limit?

Hi,
I am having some issues with my iPhone 3GS. Recently, whenever I try to send an email from my MobileMe account, I get the following error message:
A copy has been placed in your Outbox. Sending the message failed because you exceeded your sending limit.
I know Mobileme has a restriction of 200 messages per day, however I am sending one or two email so this is not the issue. Anyone have any ideas?

More than likely, yes, but since a MobileMe account is accessed as an IMAP account, when accessing the account with an email client you have the option to store messages on the server or locally on the hard drive or device. If your account has been compromised and someone is accessing the account with an email client on their computer, they could choose not to store the sent messages on the server so you wouldn't see them.

Failed to start essbase process: number of back up files exceeds limit

Can someone help to take a look at this?
More details is logged in bug 11887650
Failed to start essbase process, message in log file:
11/03/18 11:44:10 Start process
Info: Essbase is reducing the number of soft file descriptors because the 32K limit has been exceeded. Exceeding the limit may significantly increase application load time.
Environment variable [HYPERION_LOGHOME] is set - use it to define Log location folder.
Log location is [u01/APPLTOP/instance/BIInstance/diagnostics/logs/Essbase/essbaseserver3/essbase].
ODL log location is [u01/APPLTOP/instance/BIInstance/diagnostics/logs/Essbase/essbaseserver3/agent-log].
[Fri Mar 18 11:44:10 2011]Local/ESSBASE0///4072736080/Warning(1056807)
The number of back up files found on disk (40) exceeds the configured limit which is 2
[Fri Mar 18 11:44:10 2011]Local/ESSBASE0///4072736080/Info(1051283)
Retrieving License Information Please Wait...
[Fri Mar 18 11:44:10 2011]Local/ESSBASE0///4072736080/Info(1051286)
License information retrieved.
65535 Essbase user 65535 Planning user system
Logging configuration class "oracle.core.ojdl.logging.LoggingConfiguration" failed
oracle.core.ojdl.logging.LoggingConfigurationException: ODL-52050: unable to process file '/u01/APPLTOP/instance/BIInstance/Essbase/essbaseserver3/bin/logging.xml', XML parse exception (line: 5, column: 38): org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Attribute "class" is required and must be specified for element type "log_handler".
Mar 18, 2011 11:44:14 AM oracle.security.jps.az.internal.common.scanner.PolicyChangeScannerThread run
INFO: Policy store cleanup thread started.
Mar 18, 2011 11:44:14 AM
INFO: EPMCSS-CSS Fusion system initialized successfully. : [2724 ms]
[Fri Mar 18 11:44:14 2011]Local/ESSBASE0///4072736080/Info(1051199)
Single Sign-On Initialization Succeeded !
[Fri Mar 18 11:44:14 2011]Local/ESSBASE0///4072736080/Info(1051639)
Info: Essbase is reducing the number of soft file descriptors because the 32K limit has been exceeded. Exceeding the limit may significantly increase application load time.
Essbase 64-bit - Release 11.1.2 (ESB11.1.2.1.0B154)

I am an infrastructure idiot (I have all kinds of other idiocy available as well -- I am versatile), but I found:
http://troubleshooot.wordpress.com/2010/05/26/essbase-login-is-not-working/
To my ignorant eyes, this looks like some kind of *nix-centric issue.
If the post doesn't help, perhaps one of the infrastructure guys will chime in.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour

Search exceed limit

I am doing Search at Netscape Directory Server 4.16 using JNDI and get javax.naming.LimitExceededException: [LDAP: error code 11 - Administrative Limit Exceeded
What configuration I should change in the directory server 4.16 so that I can avoid this exception? Could I set it up in the slient installation in the instllation file?
Thanks,
Iris

You should index your directory. It will improve your search performance and most likely fix your problem. Your current search result is unindexed and therefore very slow exceeding your timelimit. You could also increase your time limit, but indexing would most likely do it for you or a combination of both.
Hint: your etime is 12! it should be like 2 or less.

SOLR Commit (exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=4)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for