[SOLVED]Gnome 2 in Arch Linux ??

Hi all
after installing the base system "Arch" it's time to setup the graphical interface so my question is :
how to install Gnome 2 classic , I have installed Gnome before with this command :
pacman -S install Gnome Gnome-extra
but I got the Gnome shell not the classic 1.
so what's the command to get the Gnome classic "version 2.3 or later".
I wanted to run Compiz on Arch but I couldn't use it because of the Gnome shell.
Last edited by YYaaSSeeRR (2012-09-16 05:47:45)

YYaaSSeeRR wrote:
tomk wrote:
Please try to understand at least the basics of Arch. Arch uses the latest stable versions from upstream projects - gnome 2 does not qualify.
Have a look at Mate, it might satisfy your need to turn back the clock.
thanks for the reply.
I'm learning day after day.
I have tried openSUSE and other distros but I really feel like I'm not learning anything with these distros because they have everything done for you just like Windows 7.
Learning is good. Just don't expect that the community here will fill the Windows 7-like gap in your computing life; read the wiki and search the web before posting.

Similar Messages

  • Gnome Shell - Arch linux RSS extension.

    Ive been thinking about a Gnome Shell Arch Linux extension what would show the rss feeds/news in a simple way. (A icon in the upper right)
    Anyone up to write one?  i personally have not tried this gs-extension writeing, but anytips or links and i maybe able to start one

    That's nice, But I'm finding about notification only.. no want ticker :\
    Maybe you know how I can get this works in gnome-shell?
    http://www.feednotifier.com/
    That's really nice program. :\

  • [SOLVED] New to Arch Linux, Need help in Installation.

    Hi,
    I am  Ubuntu user for sometime, but I want to migrate to Arch Linux. I need some help. Please note that I am  not Linux Expert but I have been using Ubuntu and OpenSUSE for quite sometime now. The reason for deciding to migrate to Arch Linux is with I need speed.
    My laptop configuration is
    Dell Vostro 1015 - Intel Dual Core 1.8 GHz  with 2 GB RAM.
    I was using Ubuntu 64 bit version.
    Here in Arch Linux, I find there are 3 options to download                i686 CPU,    x86-64 CPU,    Dual Architecture
    Now which one should I download among x86-64 and Dual Architecture?
    Thanks.
    Last edited by sanjaydelhi (2011-11-16 15:11:14)

    Thank you all for welcoming me at Arch Linux!
    I was bit worried at the beginning because I tried Fedora before but it has one bug because of which it does not get installed on my laptop.
    http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=255943
    I was bit disappointed being not able to use Fedora (both 14 and 15 ) because of this bug.
    The reason I got worried because I am new to Arch, as I mentioned I am not Linux expert and Arch is not for beginners( though I consider myself intermediate in Linux but certainly not expert). So I thought if I do not get community support probably I will not be able to use Arch Linux. The reason I got interest in Arch Linux is http://lifehacker.com/5680453/build-a-k … he-process this article. I am not thinking of upgrading my laptop for speed anytime sooner. So I thought of trying Arch Linux.
    The reason to post the topic was in most of Linux distros we see two options (x86, AMD_64). I found 3 options at Arch. I just wanted to make sure I am downloading right download.
    So I hope I clarified it.
    ANOKNUSA wrote:However, just for future reference: When engaging in any discussion with anyone anywhere on the internet at any time, it's often best to just leave experience and credentials out of the discussion.  I don't mean any offense myself, but claiming to be "in software development" while appearing unfamiliar with hardware architecture comes of as a bit odd.
    You are right. I should not have have brought experience and credentials in discussion. I used to follow hardware architectures but now I have so many other things to follow, so I can not keep up with hardware architectures. I still do not know exact architecture of i3,i5 or i7 processor or any of AMD processors. Thats how it is.
    I thank you all for support.
    Looking forward to trying Arch Linux.
    Thanks

  • [Solved]voip in arch linux

    Hi
    I just joined the arch bandwagon 2 weeks ago form ubuntu.
    I like to know what voip software do u use in arch linux because skype is not officially supported ?
    Last edited by neoDEH (2014-10-02 18:18:00)

    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Skype

  • [SOLVED] Triple Boot Arch Linux, Windows 7 + Windows 8 on second disk

    Hi,
    I have installed Arch Linux and Windows 7 on my primary disk. Everything's perfect. I want to install Windows 8 on my second disk. My only problem is how do I make grub2 recognize Windows 8 on the second disk and add it to the grub file, so i can boot Arch, Windows 7 and Windows 8.
    Thank you for your time,
    Deadvi
    Last edited by Deadvi (2012-08-29 21:24:00)

    It overwrote the MBR from the first disk, even though you installed Windows 8 on the second disk? That's odd... Make sure that the boot order in the BIOS is right (that the drive with Arch Linux is the first to boot) and from a 2012 Arch Linux install media run:
    # mount /dev/sdxY /mnt #Your root partition.
    # mount /dev/sdxZ /mnt/boot #Your boot partition (if you have one).
    # arch-chroot /mnt
    And continue with the instructions from here. If you don't have a 2012 Arch Linux install media (or you only have some other "live" Linux distribution), use the old chroot way.

  • [SOLVED]CR-48/Arch Linux/Installing Gnome or e17

    I'm all the way up to installing a Desktop Environment/Windows Manager. I have tried both Gnome and e17. Same issue occurs with both.
    I get hundreds of lines, "error: failed retrieving file..."
    Then:
    warning: failed to retrieve some files from extra
    error: failed to commit transaction (download library error)
    Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
    Where to next?
    Last edited by killingthemonkey (2012-03-28 20:32:13)

    Never mind. A quick run of netcfg to connect to the wifi again resolved it.

  • (SOLVED) Dualboot Windows + Arch Linux (Windows boot partition)

    Hi,
    I have 4 partitions.
    sda1: Windows boot partition (ntfs) - This has always been there
    sda2: Windows Installation
    sda3: HP_Tools - I need to keep this for warranty
    sda4: Arch Installation
    I want to use GRUB to have a dualboot option at startup. Do I need to install GRUB to the boot partition which is NTFS, this should be ext3 according to the tutorial.
    Or can I just install grub on the Arch installation in the /boot folder?
    Thanks already!
    Last edited by AlexCogn (2012-10-02 15:02:10)

    Scimmia wrote:
    AlexCogn wrote:When I do that Windows just starts.
    Then you didn't install grub to the MBR. Don't forget, installing the package isn't enough, you actually have to install grub to sda as a separate step.
    So
    # grub-install --target=i386-pc --recheck /dev/sda
    # cp /usr/share/locale/en\@quot/LC_MESSAGES/grub.mo /boot/grub/locale/en.mo
    and then
    # grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
    I forgot the installation ... I'm trying it in half an hour, thanks already for you help guys!

  • [SOLVED]Arch Linux running inside GNOME Boxes.

    Hello,
    I wanted to create a vm using GNOME Boxes to run another Arch Linux installation (to test things and avoid to break my main system).
    I did a normal install, then installed gnome-shell and gdm from testing repos. I enabled gdm and NetworkManager and after reboot my box.
    The box don't boot. The main display only see early fsck lines (about /), I can see in the thubnail more lines but can't read messages.
    What is wrong here ?
    Regards,
    Fabien
    Last edited by fbourigault (2014-10-07 11:22:36)

    I can't read it it only show in the thumbnail. I posted here to known if I missed some package installation or if someone already had the problem and solve it !.
    EDIT:
    I installed a new box, using gnome from stable repositories. I installed the same packages but didn't enable anything. I'm starting services by hand to allow me do configuration in the box
    You can find the gdm log here : http://pastebin.com/R5ek3Xwy (full version with multiple failing runs :http://pastebin.com/fCsPxAvb)
    EDIT 2 :
    Problem solved by installing xf86-video-qxl from AUR ! This package should really be in official repos.
    Last edited by fbourigault (2014-10-07 08:41:32)

  • [Solved]Arch Linux Gnome writing to usb disk destination is read only

    Hi
    i Have installed Arch Linux latest image 1-3-2015  not using Evolution Linux or any GUI installer
    i installed Arch Linux using command line
    i have gnome 3.14
    each time i try to write movie to usb flash or usb external hard disk
    the error says
    the destination disk is read only
    how to change this
    Last edited by belal (2015-04-04 20:58:54)

    I'm curious. Is the filesystem on the USB, ntfs ?
    If yes, did you install NTFS-3G ? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/NTFS-3G. Happened to me 8 days ago .
    EDIT - Sorry for the repost using the same solution as my above post. Didn't see his link. Just surfed through the posts for the word "NTFS-3g" and it wasn't there.
    Last edited by newguy (2015-03-31 07:51:48)

  • A VERY Easy Tutorial on doing a clean install of Arch Linux with Gnome

    is there anyone who could help me test Arch Linux with Gnome DE?

    The pacman bit is new, and has already been solved: [SOLVED] pacman update fails: gcc requires gcc-libs=4.7.0-3
    Just press "N" and you'll see that pacman will be on the list.
    Welcome to the forums.
    Edit:
    Shahe1993 wrote:is there anyone who cou...
    Oh. Feeling a bit busy there, huh? Nevermind.
    Last edited by DSpider (2012-04-12 17:28:18)

  • [solved] Arch linux access point with multiple interfaces for the NAT

    Hi, I have a router running Arch linux. It is connected via LAN (let's call it eth0) to the internet. It has a second LAN interface, eth1, and a wireless interface in master mode, wlan0.
    Now, Everything works perfectly except providing network connectivity on eth1 and wlan0 simultaneously. I followed the guide in the "Internet share" wiki article and use dnsmasq/hostapd for the AP. It appears as if all traffic from the router is sent to the wlan0 interface, even if it came in through eth1 (for example, dhcp requests). I cannot really find information how to solve this. The words "bonding" and "iptables" are floating around, but there is not really an easy to understand tutorial for this.
    What do I need to do to use both the eth1 and wlan0 interface (for different clients!) on my router?
    Best regards, and thank you in advance
    Jan Oliver
    /e: This seems to be my problem: http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7000318 How do I solve this using the usual iptables? (The way described in the article doesn't work: "RTNETLINK answers: No such process" errors.)
    Last edited by janoliver (2013-09-25 22:24:53)

    Or you could bridge eth1 and wlan0, and make dnsmasq bind/listen on that bridge...

  • [SOLVED] Ndiswrapper, NetworkManager 0.7 and 64-bit Arch Linux

    Hi there!
    I am having problems configuring my wireless card. I know I have to use Ndiswrapper, and this is what I have tried to do; however, it didn't go quite well.
    This is rather odd because it worked perfectly in the 32-bit version of Arch Linux, but now it doesn't work.
    So, here comes the code.
    valandil ~ $ lspci | grep Network
    0b:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4311 802.11b/g WLAN (rev 01)
    I really use ndiswrapper and have already installed what I think is the proper driver (it seems that the list the official ndiswrapper site had has somehow disappeared.
    sudo ndiswrapper -l
    Password:
    bcmwl5 : driver installed
    device (14E4:4311) present (alternate driver: ssb)
    Here's iwconfig:
    valandil ~ $ iwconfig
    lo no wireless extensions.
    eth0 no wireless extensions.
    wmaster0 no wireless extensions.
    wlan0 IEEE 802.11bg ESSID:""
    Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access Point: Not-Associated
    Tx-Power=0 dBm
    Retry min limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr=2352 B
    Power Management:off
    Link Quality:0 Signal level:0 Noise level:0
    Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0
    Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0
    I use NetworkManager 0.7 and have configured properly:
    rc.conf:
    # /etc/rc.conf - Main Configuration for Arch Linux
    # LOCALIZATION
    # LOCALE: available languages can be listed with the 'locale -a' command
    # HARDWARECLOCK: set to "UTC" or "localtime"
    # USEDIRECTISA: use direct I/O requests instead of /dev/rtc for hwclock
    # TIMEZONE: timezones are found in /usr/share/zoneinfo
    # KEYMAP: keymaps are found in /usr/share/kbd/keymaps
    # CONSOLEFONT: found in /usr/share/kbd/consolefonts (only needed for non-US)
    # CONSOLEMAP: found in /usr/share/kbd/consoletrans
    # USECOLOR: use ANSI color sequences in startup messages
    LOCALE="en_US.utf8"
    HARDWARECLOCK="localtime"
    USEDIRECTISA="no"
    TIMEZONE="America/Vancouver"
    KEYMAP="cf"
    CONSOLEFONT=
    CONSOLEMAP=
    USECOLOR="yes"
    # HARDWARE
    # MOD_AUTOLOAD: Allow autoloading of modules at boot and when needed
    # MOD_BLACKLIST: Prevent udev from loading these modules
    # MODULES: Modules to load at boot-up. Prefix with a ! to blacklist.
    # NOTE: Use of 'MOD_BLACKLIST' is deprecated. Please use ! in the MODULES array.
    MOD_AUTOLOAD="yes"
    #MOD_BLACKLIST=() #deprecated
    MODULES=(fuse ndiswrapper fglrx !b44 !mii bcm43xx !snd_pcsp snd-mixer-oss snd-pcm-oss snd-hwdep snd-page-alloc snd-pcm snd-timer snd snd-hda-intel soundcore !pcspkr)
    # Scan for LVM volume groups at startup, required if you use LVM
    USELVM="no"
    # NETWORKING
    # HOSTNAME: Hostname of machine. Should also be put in /etc/hosts
    HOSTNAME="cipher"
    # Use 'ifconfig -a' or 'ls /sys/class/net/' to see all available interfaces.
    # Interfaces to start at boot-up (in this order)
    # Declare each interface then list in INTERFACES
    # - prefix an entry in INTERFACES with a ! to disable it
    # - no hyphens in your interface names - Bash doesn't like it
    # DHCP: Set your interface to "dhcp" (eth0="dhcp")
    # Wireless: See network profiles below
    #eth0="eth0 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255"
    eth0="dhcp"
    INTERFACES=(lo !eth0 !wlan0)
    # Routes to start at boot-up (in this order)
    # Declare each route then list in ROUTES
    # - prefix an entry in ROUTES with a ! to disable it
    gateway="default gw 192.168.1.1"
    ROUTES=(!gateway)
    # Enable these network profiles at boot-up. These are only useful
    # if you happen to need multiple network configurations (ie, laptop users)
    # - set to 'menu' to present a menu during boot-up (dialog package required)
    # - prefix an entry with a ! to disable it
    # Network profiles are found in /etc/network.d
    # This now requires the netcfg package
    #NETWORKS=(main)
    # DAEMONS
    # Daemons to start at boot-up (in this order)
    # - prefix a daemon with a ! to disable it
    # - prefix a daemon with a @ to start it up in the background
    DAEMONS=(@stbd httpd !network syslog-ng netfs crond alsa hal dhcdbd networkmanager fam gdm)
    hosts file :
    # /etc/hosts: static lookup table for host names
    #<ip-address> <hostname.domain.org> <hostname>
    127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost cipher
    # End of file
    /etc/NetworkManager/nm-system-settings.conf:
    GNU nano 2.0.9 File: /etc/NetworkManager/nm-system-settings.conf
    [main]
    plugins=keyfile
    [keyfile]
    hostname=cipher
    I hope you can solve this problem; wireless is really crucial.
    Thanks for any help,
    Last edited by valandil (2012-05-02 18:27:09)

    Alleluia!!!
    I think I will write a new rule for myself to follow :
    Thou shalt never use ndiswrapper again.
    Thanks a lot, wonder, and thanks to you too, Xyne.
    FYI, I tried to use something else than ndiswrapper before, but it didn't yield satisfying results. Anyway, thanks.

  • [SOLVED] Arch Linux Duke (2007) Fails to Boot

    Folks, I have a unique and challenging problem that has exhausted my Arch Linux skills, and so I am now turning to you.
    I have a vintage Pentium Pro 200 system (that’s 200 MHz folks! – 200 MHz 686 architecture – the original 686!), two CPUs, running a dual boot between Windows NT 4.0 and Arch Linux Duke (2007). It has 512 MB of RAM and a 120 GB hard drive, partitioned up between Windows NT and Linux. I built this system new in 2007, hence the dated version of Arch.  It has run like a charm all these years, granted not getting that much use. After about a year of no use at all, I fired the system up last week to help with a little research for a blog post I was writing on networking Windows NT 4.0 and Mac OS 8.6. Windows NT 4.0 fired right up with no issue, and after I was done testing what needed to be tested I tried to boot over to Arch.
    After a year of disuse, Arch unexpectedly and stubbornly refused to boot. The boot process started up just fine, but towards the end, it declared that it could not mount the root file system on the root device and took a kernel panic and stopped. My Arch skills have gotten a bit rusty in the last few years, but I dusted them off and went to work. My guess was a file system or superblock error. Arch wouldn’t boot, but I dragged out my trusty RIPLinux 2.9 Rescue Live CD and fired it up. It came right up and ran, and I was able to mount the Arch partition and view all the files… everything seemed to be there; it just wouldn’t boot. Windows NT 4.0 AND RIPLinux both boot and run on the machine, so the hardware is fine as well.
    A little information on the disk layout. Windows NT 4.0 is in the first partition on the hard drive. The extended partition has a second Windows NT 4.0 partition (sort of a /home partition for Windows NT 4.0), followed by the main Arch partition (the one I am trying to boot), followed by a swap partition and then the largest partition, which I use to share data between Arch and Windows NT 4.0 (I have loaded an ext2/3 driver into Windows NT 4.0 and it happily accesses the Linux partitions on the box).
    RIPLinux’s e2fsck did find some issues with the Arch partition and I had it repair them all. I checked again afterwards that all the files were still there, and they were. With the partition now known to be clean, and the superblock repaired from one of the backups, all should have been well. However, Arch still wouldn’t (and still won’t) boot.
    RIPLinux has a kind of a chain loader function, so I had it attempt to start up Arch for me. However, this was flummoxed by the fact that Arch addresses all my hard drive partitions as /dev/sdax and RIPLinux addresses them as /dev/hdax. Hence, without a common language, it was hard to get the one to start the other. Still, using this function, I have been able to get a crippled version of Arch running on the machine again. No modules had been loaded, and so it couldn’t do almost anything, but there it was (and is), Arch Linux Duke, at the CLI level. From there, I can see all the files, I can move freely in and out of my user account and the root account, but I can’t make the thing actually boot properly.
    If you have read this far, you are a trooper.  Summarizing what I know, the hardware is good, the file system is clean, the superblock is good, I can mount it cleanly from a live CD and I can chain load a crippled version of Arch. Here is the boot process blow-by-blow. When I try to do a normal boot, the Windows NT 4.0 loader passes control to the Lilo boot sector I have placed on hda1 (sda1 in Duke’s parlance). Lilo takes over, present a menu and when I select Duke, takes off. Arch Linux Duke starts to boot. It gets a good long way along, all the way along to:
    :: Loading udev events                [Pass]
    :: Mount root Read-only
    :: Checking file systems
    This is where it stops.
    The next thing I see is:
    /dev/sda6
    The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2 filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else) then the superblock is corrupt and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
        E2fsck –b 8193 <device>
    I then get a sort of character based splash screen that says
    **********FILE SYSTEM CHECK FAILED ****************************
    *   Please repair manually and reboot. Note that the root file system
    *   is currently mounted read-only. To remount it read-write, type:
    *   mount –n –o remount,rw /.  When you exit the maintenance
    *   shell, the system will reboot automatically
    Give root password for maintenance
    At this point, I give the root password and enter the maintenance shell as root. I typed in “mount” and the first entry I got back is
    /dev/sda6 on / type ext3 (rw)
    This is exactly the root partition that the start up complains about. It is clearly there.  I can see it, I can walk around it… it is clearly there. Why won’t it boot? Despite the message, the superblock is fine – it passes every test e2fsck can throw at it.
    At this point, I did a “e2fsck /dev/hda6 (which is how RIPLinux would have passed it into Arch” and it says it is “clean”. I suspect that the Superblock message is because Arch sees root as sda6, while RIP passed it in as hda6...
    Deciding to see what Arch would be seeing as it tried to set things up in the boot sequence, I tried the following next:
    # mknod “/dev/root2” b 3 6   
    (“3” because RIPLinux refers to my hard drive as IDE, while Arch refers to it by major number “8”, which is SCSI. By the way, it IS an IDE drive – not sure why Arch insists on using the sdx nomenclature instead of hdx)
    Then I entered “mount /dev/root2 /mnt/hda6” and “ls /mnt/hda6”
    All was well. I can make the node, I can mount it, and I can see the contents. All is clearly well, but something is clearly wrong enough that Arch can’t boot.
    I am totally out of ideas. I have tried every trick I know and am out of tricks. I would welcome any insights as to what I could try to get this venerable Arch installation back on its legs.
    By the way, the key section of the /etc/lilo.conf file (lest anyone want to know) is:
    image = /boot/vmlinuz26
       root = /dev/sda6
       label = ArchLinux-Duke
       initrd = /boot/kernel26.img
       read-only
    I am stumped. Thanks in advance for any and all pointers you may be able to offer.
    Last edited by mac57 (2014-06-02 17:42:21)

    Folks, thanks for all your helpful comments, and I wanted to report back to you that I finally overcame the issue, and ArchLinux-Duke (2007) is once again executing flawlessly on my old Pentium Pro 200 system. I won't bother reporting here all the blind allies I went down as I tried to figure out what was wrong, but in the end, literally moments before I was about to give up and overwrite my Arch installation with a new Linux variant (antiX seemed well suited for such old and low power hardware), my attention was drawn to a note I had made in my files back in 2007 about a problem with similar symptoms. In that case, I had just deleted ZenWalk Linux from the hard drive (both Arch and Zen had been on the drive), and merged several partitions to make use of the newly free space. This had changed Arch's view of the drive lettering, and what had been its /dev/sddx root device was now /dev/sdcx. Arch failed to boot, throwing off the same errors I was seeing now. I wish I had recalled that note a month or so ago! It would have saved me a lot of work and a lot of frustration.
    At any rate, as a last step, and testing the idea that maybe the drive lettering had changed for some reason, I repeatedly manually booted Arch, specifying root=/dev/sda6, then /dev/sdb6, then /dev/sdd6, and finally, /dev/sdc6. Eureka! Arch now considered itself to be on /dev/sdc6 whereas previously it had been on /dev/sda6. This got me part way there, but the boot failed at the filesystem check stage and threw me into root. I disabled the file system check in /etc/rc.sysinit and got farther. Then I cleaned up /etc/fstab to agree with the new sdc naming, and I was back on the air fully.
    So, what had happened was that Arch had changed its view of the drive it was on from sda6 to sdc6. While I could not understand why this "sudden" change had occurred, at least I had a solution, and had Arch back up and running.
    Trolling through the rest of my notes, I found the answer. In 2012, the Tekram SCSI card in the machine failed, and I ultimately replaced it with an Adaptec card. The Tekram card did not have a BIOS segment on it. The Adaptec card did. My guess is that this caused the two internal SCSI devices I have built into the system (Iomega ZIP and Jaz respectively) to be enumerated first, claiming the "sda" and "sdb". device names. That left "sdc" for the root device, and that is where Arch went next.  This is my guess anyway.
    I should have caught this issue back in 2012, at the time, but from my notes, I can see that I tested the new card thoroughly using the  Windows NT 4.0 side of the machine, but never thought to bring up Arch as well. Hence, this problem lay dormant for two years, before I attempted to fire up Arch last month and blundered right into it.
    It has not all been bad. I have learned more about the ext2 and ext3 file systems and superblocks in the intervening time than I will ever need to use. I have learned how to manually boot Linux on a machine whose BIOS is so old that it cannot address the disk cylinder that the kernel is on and I have completely refreshed the many general Linux skills that used to just flow from my finger tips. It has been a frustrating experience, but ultimately a successful and useful one.
    Just wanted to let everyone know that this is now [SOLVED]. I would mark the post as such, but I don't see any obvious way to do that. Thanks again everyone.

  • [SOLVED]Multiple Problems after a new install on Arch Linux

    Hello all,
    I just finished installing Arch Linux from the core ISO which I downloaded from the site. The install went smoothly and booted up fine. Also I was able to install gnome and its extras fine as well. On the first boot after installing gnome I managed to get my resolution correct also. However later on after I installed compiz fusion everything with the resolution seems to be going wrong . My computer specs are shown below :
    AMD 64 3200
    Asus M2N MX-SE
    2 GB Ram
    Geforce 8600 GT
    Viewsonic VA1918wm (Native resolution is 1440x900)
    At the moment I can only manage to get upto 1024x768 and it looks quite bad at that resolution. I have attached the xorg.conf I have at the moment.
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "X.org Configured"
    Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "dbe"
    Load "record"
    Load "extmod"
    Load "glx"
    Load "dri2"
    Load "dri"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Monitor Vendor"
    ModelName "Monitor Model"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "nvidia"
    VendorName "nVidia Corporation"
    BoardName "G84 [GeForce 8600 GT]"
    BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Card0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 1
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 4
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 8
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 15
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 16
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    While I was trying to fix this I noticed I was encountering other problems also. For one I found that sometimes dhcpcd times out on booting up and I cant seemt o connect to the Internet on booting. Although I just thought of trying a static IP and I'll post if that helped later on.
    Another problem is I found that I seem to get the following error randomly. Pressing ctrl + D after this just restarts the machine.
    The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2
    filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2
    filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
    is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
    e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
    Finally, while I boot up I noticed that it says "Mounting root partition as read only   [DONE]"  Is the root partition supposed ot be mounted as read only ? Attached my fstab just in case it is needed.
    # /etc/fstab: static file system information
    # <file system> <dir> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
    none /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
    none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
    #/dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0
    #/dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0
    #/dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0
    /dev/sda3 /boot ext3 defaults 0 1
    /dev/sdb1 / ext3 defaults 0 1
    /dev/sdb2 swap swap defaults 0 0
    /dev/sdb3 /home ext3 defaults 0 1
    As you can see I'm quite new to Arch Linux so any help would be deeply appreciated.
    Last edited by FilledVoid (2009-09-11 16:28:28)

    Thank you for all your suggestions . I tried replacing the ID to Card0 but it didnt seem to fix it . However on the bright side I checked more threads on the forum and found some that helped out . :)
    http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=75070&p=2
    http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=72788
    http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=76938
    I copied the xorg.conf file from the third link and just made minor changes to it like removing all the resolutions I didn't need and now its working fine :).
    Now Im just stuck with two problems. One is the following message which appears randomly.
    The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2
    filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2
    filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
    is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
    e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
    ******************* FILESYSTEM CHECK FAILED *************
    * Please repair manually and reboot. Note that the root *
    * filesystem is currently mounted read-only. To remount *
    * it read-write type: mount -n -o remount,rw / *
    * When you exit the mantenance shel the system will *
    * reboot automatically. *
    A thread about the same can be found http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=295384 but there isn't a solution on it. 
    The second is the intermittent problems with the Network being setup. Sometimes when I boot up it just says dhcpcd timedout and I won't be able to connect . However I can connect on another machine at the same time.
    Took a look at the drive in question with gparted and it shows the below information:
    /dev/sdb1 ext3   /   32.59 GB    4.92 GB   27.68 GB  boot
    By any chance is any of the above information relevant :x ?

  • [SOLVED] Arch Linux on Macbook Pro 4.1

    Hey There,
    I'm a 2 years old Arch Linux guy and due to the problems I've had with my HP Pavilion PC, I've bought a Macbook Pro 3-4 months ago.. Because that it's a pain in the ass to install, upgrade and remove software on Mac OS X, especially development software such as Python and its bindings, I'm thinking of migrating to Arch Linux. Any way, I've just installed Arch Linux and dual boot..
    I've installed X, GNOME, NVIDIA so far and when I try to open GNOME (via startx), it opens up a 800x600 or 1024x768 resolution X and shows GNOME.. But I can't move the mouse and no matter what I type no menus show up.. So I'm stuck after GNOME starts.. I can't drop back into the terminal so I hold the power button to shutdown and start the machine...
    It seems that this is the only problem I have for now.. Anyone had this problem before? I've tried it with and without xorg.conf and the result is the same..
    Last edited by T-u-N-i-X (2008-11-30 16:17:11)

    CTRL + ALT + Backspace
    That should close startx.  Also, the user manual has a couple of alternative methods of setting up your xorg.conf file.  I'd try those next.
    http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Beg … phic_Cards
    Last edited by sharpie (2008-11-30 14:05:39)

  • Arch Linux PPC : Gnome 2.16.1 in Testing

    Gnome 2.16.1, Evolution and beagle are in testing on Arch Linux PPC . Please test
    - Benoît

    nice, will try it out on my powerbook later on

Maybe you are looking for

  • Best Practice for commenting clips?

    I have started working on a project that includes taking a bunch of previously shot video for a series of marketing campaigns. Each video is a short 2 - 3 minute vignette of one part of the institution I work for. The clips I get are already dumped f

  • Change size of pages/text in pdf book

    Hello I am trying to read a few pdf books but the text is so small that I have to zoom way in and then scroll from side to side to read the thing. Its super irritating. Is there a way to make the pdf book act more like the regular books? I would like

  • PQAH- can't see SAVE button

    Hi friends, I have a test user into 2 environments, Prod and QA. Into prod, using PQAH t-code test user can see SAVE, NEW and OPEN button to use query. But into QA environment, user can't see any of these buttons. User has same roles into both enviro

  • Link to an animation

    Is there a way to link to an small animation? I use links all the time to clip art and to text on my web site but I have small animation pieces that have text underneath and although the links are hooked to the text, my students always click on the a

  • Why doesn't VCast see my DroidX? Version wrong?

    Hi All, Anyone know what to do? My VCast install doesn't 'see' the DroidX. Is thaere a specific version needed to sync the X? Thanks, Chip