Some deliveries selected for Ship Confirm have errors or warnings

Hi Guys,
Getting the ship confirm error.
we dont have the following at the item level
1) revision control
2) serial controlled
3) lot controlled
4) sub-inventory control and all other controls
and shipping parametres are correctly defined.
This is happening only in UAT, in all other environments the issue is not reproduced.
Kindly advise.

Guys,
Got an update from users that some lines have conditional holds.
I tested in other environments it worked well.
So I thought there might be some other issue than expected.
Cheer!!

Similar Messages

Project Contracts Deliverables : Unable to Ship Confirm

Sub : Project Contracts Deliverables : Unable to Ship Confirm
Hi,
When trying to " Ship Confirm " for deliveries initiated from Project Contracts, Error Msg appears :
Error : Some deliveries selected for ship confirm have errors or warnings.
On clicking DETAIL buttton :
Error:Delivery Details xxxyy in this delivery do not satisfy inventory controls.
Warning:The Ship Confirm Option selected will unassign all the lines from delivery yyyxx.
Regards
adi

Hi,
Please check the metalink note: 227843.1 for this issue.
Hope this helps!
Thanks,
Sathish Raju
www.projectsaccounting.com

Set Field Selection for Completion Confirmation

I want to change the indicator of one field from "ready to input" to "required"..But i couldnt understand exactly the hierarchy under "Set Field Selection for Completion Confirmation" tab in SPRO. there are 3 parts under that tab;
1-PM: Confirmation - initial screen
2-PM: Confirmation - list and detail
3-PM: Confirmation - parameter
and i also couldnt find the name of my field which is about "codes for causes"..
Thanks...

Russ,
I don't think it could be accomplished through configuration or through Transaction variants.
I think the simplest way to accomplish this would be by using one of the below user exits according to your needs.
CONFPM02: Customer-specific entry checks 1
CONFPM03: Customer-specific check by operation selection
CONFPM04: Customer-specific entry checks 2
The other option would be to use the Implicit enhancement functionality(If you are in EC C6.0 or above) to modify the table control field attributes dynamically.
Regards
Narasimhan

OpenSQL DataSource not allowed if select-for-update is used Error?

Hi,
I have created an enterprise application, EJB (Session + entity) + WAR, and corresponding ear file deployes with the following warning message, I have done similar apps in the past without erros.
Warning: DataSource TMP_EMPLOYEES_DATA is OpenSQL. It is used by an abstract schema that uses select-for-update locking. It is now allwed to use OpenSQL DataSource if select-for-updaet is used.
Any idea?
Thanks

Hi Ezatullah, all,
while I do not propose an alternative solution, I'd like to add some explanation to the error message itself: Open SQL for Java strives to provide portable semantics across the set of supported databases and does not offer features which can not be provided by all the databases.
Now, a SELECT .. FOR UPDATE in the semantics as used here is not generally available, in particular not regarding the locking semantics.
Thus, the feature is rejected in combination with a Open SQL/JDBC data source.
Best Regards, Dietmar

Deadlock detected during SELECT FOR UPDATE - an application error?

I have a general question about how Oracle prevents deadlocks from affecting
applications: do I need to build support into the application for handling
deadlocks when they occur in this particular scenario, or should Oracle handle
this for me? I'd like to know whether this is "normal" behavior for an Oracle
application, or if there is an underlying problem. Consider the following situation:
Two sessions issue individual SELECT FOR UPDATE queries. Each query locates
records in the table using a different index. These indexes point to rows in a
different order from each other, meaning that a deadlock will occur if the two
statement execute simultaneously.
For illustrative purposes, consider these rows in a hypothetical table.
ALPHABET
alpha
bravo
charlie
delta
echo
foxtrot
golf
hotel
Index A results in traversing the table in ascending alphabetical order; index
B, descending. If two SELECT FOR UPDATE statements concurrently execute on this
table--one with an ascending order execution path and one in descending order--
the two processes will deadlock at the point where they meet. If Session A
locks alpha, bravo, charlie, and delta, while Session B locks hotel, golf,
foxtrot, and echo, then neither process can proceed. A needs to lock echo, and
B needs to lock delta, but one cannot continue until the other releases its
locks.
This execution path can be encouraged using hints. Executing queries similar to these on larger tables will generate the "collision" as described above.
-- Session A
select /*+ index_asc (customer) */
from customer
where gender = 'M'
for update;
-- Session B
select /*+ index_desc (customer) */
from customer
where gender = 'M'
for update;
Oracle will recognize that both sessions are in a stand-off, and it will roll
back the work performed by one of the two sessions to break the deadlock.
My question pivots on whether or not, in this situation, the deadlock gets
reported back to the application executing the queries as an ORA-00060. If
these are the ONLY queries executed during these sessions, I would think that
Oracle would rollback the locking performed in one of the SELECT FOR UPDATE
statements. If I understand correctly,
(1) Oracle silently rolls back and replays work performed by UPDATE statements
when a deadlock situation occurs within the scope of the update statement,
and
(2) A SELECT FOR UPDATE statement causes Oracle, at the point in time the cursor
is opened, to lock all rows matching the WHERE clause.
If this is the case, then should I expect Oracle to produce an ORA-00060
deadlock detection error for two SELECT FOR UPDATE statements?
I would think that, for deadlock situations completely within Oracle's control,
this should be perceived to the application invoking the SELECT FOR UPDATE
statements as regular blocking. Since the query execution plans are the sole
reason for this deadlock situation, I think that Oracle would handle the
situation gracefully (like it does for UPDATE, as referenced in (1)).
Notice, from the trace file below, that the waits appear to be from row locking,
and not from an artificial deadlock (e.g. ITL contention).
Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.7.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning option
DEADLOCK DETECTED
Current SQL statement for this session:
SELECT XXX FROM YYY WHERE ZZZ LIKE 'AAA%' FOR UPDATE
----- PL/SQL Call Stack -----
object line object
handle number name
58a1f8f18 4 anonymous block
58a1f8f18 11 anonymous block
The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
information may aid in determining the deadlock:
Deadlock graph:
---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
TX-002f004b-000412cf 37 26 X 26 44 X
TX-002e0044-000638b7 26 44 X 37 26 X
session 26: DID 0001-0025-00000002 session 44: DID 0001-001A-00000002
session 44: DID 0001-001A-00000002 session 26: DID 0001-0025-00000002
Rows waited on:
Session 44: obj - rowid = 0000CE31 - AAANCFAApAAAAGBAAX
Session 26: obj - rowid = 0000CE33 - AAANCHAArAAAAOmAAM
Thanks for your insight,
- Curtis
(1) "Oracle will silently roll back your update and restart it"
http://tkyte.blogspot.com/2005/08/something-different-part-i-of-iii.html
(2) "All rows are locked when you open the cursor, not as they are fetched."
http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/A87860_01/doc/appdev.817/a77069/05_ora.htm#2170
Message was edited by:
Curtis Light

Thanks for your response. In my example, I used the indexes to force a pair of query execution plans to "collide" somewhere in the table in question by having one query traverse the table via index in an ascending order, and another in descending. This is an artificial scenario for reproducible illustrative purposes, but similar collisions could legitimately occur in real world scenarios (e.g. a full table scan and an index range scan with lookup by ROWID).
So, with that said, I think it would be unreasonable for Oracle to report the collision as a ORA-00060 every time it occurs because:
(1) The UPDATE statement handles this situation automatically, and
(2) An ORA-00060 results in a 100+KB trace file being written out, only rational for truly erroneous situations.
I agree that, when the application misbehaves and locks rows out of order in separate SQL statements, then Oracle should raise an ORA-00060, as the deadlock is outside of its control. But in this case, the problem occurs with just two individual SQL statements, each within its own transaction.

What are some good cases for iPad2 that have a notebook inside?

Hello! I luv meh i pad 2 and i wanna case with a notebook attached. Any links or opinions would be appreciated! thanks, Katrina the tech girl.

Hello! I luv meh i pad 2 and i wanna case with a notebook attached. Any links or opinions would be appreciated! thanks, Katrina the tech girl.

Unable to ship confirm, showing stops cannot be set to status closed

hi all,
while i am performing shipconfirm,
it showing "Error:some deliveries selected for ship confirm have errors or warnings"
and details showing "stops cannot be set to status closed"
appreciate u r best suggestions.
thanks
govardhan

Dear ,
Maybe you need to check all delivery line status ..
All line status should be "Staged.." .
If there is any status not staged, System will show the error.
Hope it's useful to you.

OM vision India Hyderabad---exception while doing the ship confirm

order management vision India Hyderabad ----we are getting the exception while doing the ship confirm the exceptions are shown below:
Order: 20041 customer: C2il_customer Item: XXBikeEngine Error: NO DATA FOUND
Order: 20041 customer: C2il_customer Item: XXBikeEngine Error: NO DATA FOUND Transactions window: Pick and ship
Errors
Warning: Item on delivery detail 3962489 does not have pre-specified weight and volume.
Warning: Delivery 3773383 has null Weight
Error: Bill of Lading Number could not be generated because the ship method code was not selected for the trip 3129358.
Warning: Bill of Lading information could not be automatically created for delivery 3773383.
Submitted 4 out of 4 documents for this document set. (REQ_IDS=5807692, 5807693, 5807694, 5807695)
Warning: Failed to submit document set for delivery 3773383
Warning: 1 deliveries will be marked as Confirmed.
Warning: Some deliveries selected for Ship Confirm have errors or warnings.
i am grateful if any one can provide suggestion on the issue.....

Can you please share the documents and suggestions for R12Have you reviewed all the docs referenced above?
actually all are working fine in normal vision operations,and we are facing the exceptions while we are doing in OM vision India Hyderabad.
is there any setups do we configured for the OM vision India Hyderabad.if you can share any information on that it will be helpful...If the docs referenced above and Oracle Documentation http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B53825_08/current/html/docset.html do not help, then I would suggest you log a SR.
Thanks,
Hussein

Ship confirmation error.

While Ship confirming a sales order there is an error - The Action cannot be performed because the selected records are not eligible.
What is the reason for this?

You may also review:
[Note: 735635.1 - Can Not Ship Confirm An Order|https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=735635.1]
[Note: 466276.1 - Ship Confirm (WSHFSTRX) Errors-Cannot Ship Confirm-Fnd_api.G_exc_error E|https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=466276.1]
[Note: 337733.1 - Unable to Ship Confirm An Order That Errors With This Action Cannot Be Performed On All Selected Records|https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=337733.1]

Problem in ID when i select for adapters

Hai all,
Problem in ID when i select for adapters
Throwing an error:
Connection to system REPOSITORY using application REPOSITORY lost. Detailed information: Error accessing "http://<host>:50100/rep/query/int?container=any" with user "PIDIRUSER". Response code is 503, response message is "Service Unavailable"
For this steps i did:
1. i have refreshed the cache.
2.i have imported the file in designed objects SAP BASIS 7.0 level 10 in IR part as my server is PI7.0 sp 9.
3.And also checked the PIDIRUSER its working fine.
Can anyone suggest me regarding this.
Its urgent.
Thanks,
Kalyan.

Hi,
Check if any of the service users (XI*) are locked.
Looks like PIDIRUSER is locked or using a wrong password.
Thanks
Swarup
Edited by: Swarup Sawant on Jun 11, 2008 2:57 PM

Unable to generate output for Ship Docs.

Ship confirm docs.
Pack Slip,
Commer Invoice ,
Bill of lading
Are not picking xml Templates.The OUTPUT is unpublished.
But when they run as independent request output is correctly generated .Please suggest if any one has same problem

they are Customized Reports. Created new Doc set for Ship confirm.
When Sales order is Ship confirmed and when we are are printing these docs.They are not picking XML templates in Layout.
Edited by: Sankuratri on May 21, 2009 11:57 PM

What is purpose of Shipping APIs and advantages oveer ship confirm interface

Any body has idea about these shipping APIs like
WSH_TRIPS_PUB /WSH_DELIVERIES_PUB ???? At One time you can enter
only one record through API (Like One time only one trip info
can enter) ,so the same can be done though Transaction Window ??
so why should i go for ship confirm API?what are the advantages?
I am not able to find much information about it.
If any one has idea about it ,pls let me know.

There is no other supported way to bring shipping information
from an external system into 11i without using the API's. There
were shipping interfaces prior to 11i but they are now
desupported and only the API's are supported.
It is taking a step back but ....
Rishi

When ever I try to watch any video, from a link or YouTube say, using Firefox, I get a message 'An error as occurred. Please try again later'. It has been this way for some weeks. I don't have this problem using Safari or Opera.

When ever I try to watch any video, from a link or YouTube say, using Firefox, I get a message ‘An error as occurred. Please try again later’. It has been this way for some weeks. I don’t have this problem using Safari or Opera.

I believe that our “Werbung problem” adds an additional second hyperlink to the pop-up window. This second link is activated whenever you trigger a saved hyperlink to a Mail.com site.
I had the same problem and eliminated it by deleting all bookmarks, hyperlinks and automatic links that take firefox to a mail.com address. So I just deleted all bookmarks I had saved for mail.com. I also changed my home page link because it also went to my email at mail.com. I then did a warm boot, opened firefox and re-saved my bookmarks and homepage to the desired addresses. Good luck.

My table of contents does not use the entry style I select for words in the paragraph that have character styles applied to them in the chapter, so some of the letters are showing up as green, which is fine in the chapter but not in the TOC.

My table of contents does not use the entry style I select for words in the paragraph that have character styles applied to them in the chapter, so some of the letters, specifically parameters, are showing up green, which is fine in the chapter but not in the TOC. I can manually fix this in the TOC by changing the character style to none after the toc has been generated, but I don't want to do this.

What application are you running? Please ask this in the forum of the product you're using.

When i try to watch any movie or songs on youtube is s show me this error some plugins required by this page have been blocked for your protection

when i try to watch any movie or songs on youtube is s show me this error
some plugins required by this page have been blocked for your protection
and when i check fire fox ads -on it show me shockwave flash 10.3 r183 disable and i m unable to unable it how i can unable it? plz send me suggestion on [email protected] thx
i need to unable 10.3 r183 plug from ads-on but its disable and no button to unable it

See also http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/archived-flash-player-versions.html
You can find the last Firefox 3.6.x release in all languages and for all Operating Systems here:
*Firefox 3.6: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all-older.html

Some deliveries selected for Ship Confirm have errors or warnings

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for