Sony AF 35mm F1.4 G Lens Profile Available

Hi there,
for all you Sony Alpha 850/900 users with the Sony/Minolta 35mm F1.4 lens, I've made a profile for that lens last night.
It can be found here:
http://www.florian-knorn.com/2010/10/sony-35mm-f1-4-g-adobe-lens-profile.html
Best wishes,
Florian

According to the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader:

Similar Messages

Sony 50mm f1.4 ZA SSM Lens Profile in 8.4 RC any way I can download file and load into Lightroom ?

Sony 50mm f1.4 ZA SSM Lens Profile in 8.4 RC any way I can download file and load into Lightroom ?

Short answer. No.

Lens Profile for Nikon 18-35 f/3.5-4.5

Will there be a lens profile available for the Nikon 18-35 f/3.5-4.5? I am using LR5 & PS6.

Download and install Adobe Lens Profile Downloader 1.0.1.
With this program you can download a lens profile for 18-35mm f/3.5-4.5 FX format, raw type only and for DX format, raw and jpeg type.

Correct Lens Profile Not Available for Exported/Imported Image Files

Any help with this would be appreciated. I just noticed yesterday that when I have RAW (DNG) files in my LR5.2 library, I can select the correct lens profile to apply. When I take three of those files and merge them together in Photomatix Pro they come back as a single TIFF file. Now LR only has one lens profile available, and it is the wrong one.
This is happening with my Sony NEX-7 and Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR DI-III VC. With the RAW files, I have a list of Tamron lenses from which to choose, and the correct one is available. For the merged TIFF file, however, only a single Tamron lens is available for selection, and it is not the lens I used.
If anyone has any ideas about this and can get me past it, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks,
~Steve

Here's my workflow for this particular situation: After importing the original RAW files, I apply lens correction using the correct profile. I export to another application that creates a new (TIFF) file that comes back into LR. Even though I already applied the correction to the original files, I can see that there is a difference in distortion between the original files and the new TIFF.
If your other application is opening the Raw file directly, it will likely be disregarding either most, or all, Lightroom adjustments even if they are somehow communicated to it. It will come down to whatever independent Raw support is built into the other application.
The other application would still need to (a) "understand" about Adobe lens profiles etc, (b) "know" where to find the appropriate Adobe profile on disk, and (c) be equipped to do the specific and proprietary processing that they refer to. The same applies for all the other Adobe-proprietary processing instructions. The only software I am aware of which can do all this reliably, in partnership with LR, is Adobe Camera Raw plus Photoshop.
I've trained myself that whenever a new file is created in an application outside of LR (including PS), I always re-apply lens correction upon first returning to LR. If I'm interpreting the above responses correctly, I shouldn't need to re-apply lens correction if I applied it to the original files. But again, it's not my observation that this is the case.
If your particular workflow is failing to reflect the first application of lens corrections (as well as perhaps, other specific adjustments) - then what returns to LR will not have undergone those kinds of corrections yet.
I'm also hearing that I may need to download a lens profile for this lens for a TIFF file format. I've never needed to do that before, so perhaps I'll give that a shot.
As I understand it, Photomatix can also accept converted TIFFs or JPGs from LR - instead of Raw fles. I am skeptical that you will realise any "clear water" advantage from sending Raws rather than TIFF (or even, high quality JPG in many cases) from LR into Photomatix - assuming the LR conversion is already optimising the images for the required purpose. You would be doing that step in an interactive environment rather than blindly via a generic converter. Such intermediate bitmaps are in my experience perfectly good candidates for HDR processing, or for exposure fusion (which I prefer - though I don't use Photomatix in particular).
Any workflow which causes LR to in effect Export suitable bitmaps that incorporate all current adjustments, will embody lens corrections as part of that. By the way, the workflow into Photoshop HDR is similarly done by way of converted bitmaps - though in that case it is ACR rather than LR which achieves these converted bitmaps, and into memory rather than into separately saved files, but the outcome is effectively the same.
The only downside is the "cleanup" is to get rid of intermediate TIFFS or JPGs afterwards. I usually put the completed "merged" image at the top of a "stack" containing the component exposures, and collapse the stack down. But the (disposable) intermediates don't get imported to LR, and by setting these to occur in a subfolder or with a distinctive name suffix, they are easily found and deleted in due course.
RP

Lens profile Canon g1x mark II

Dear all,
yesterday I installed the new Lightroom 5.5.
I own a Canon G1X Mark II (as a second camera). I can view and work with the raw files of this camera, no problem (this was working with 5.4, too).
But I cannot see this camera model in the lens profile selection. Only the previous model is listed.
Now my questions: Is a lens profile for the new mark II available?
Or will it come with a new release?
Does anybody know if there is a public lens profile available?
Regards
Bernd

I’d guess the G1X has always-on profiles encoded in the raw files so there’s no external Adobe profile needed.
Starting with Camera Raw 8.4 plug-in for Photoshop, it will say when there is a built-in, always on profile being used, but LR didn't get this capability, yet. curvature of straight lines parallel to and near to the borders of the photos or do things look relatively straight. If the latter, there is probably a lens profile being used behind the scenes, already.
If you want you can upload a G1X raw file you're curious about, using www.dropbox.com and post a public download link, here, and maybe someone will see it and test for you in Photoshop.

Lens Profile missing in LR5

Hi
Since I upgraded from LR4 to 5.4 I seem to have lost some lens profiles. In particular I'm looking for a Nikon profile for my 28-300 lens, working in RAW mode.
Nor can I see the lens profile in the list of profiles available when using the Adobe Lens Profile Down-loader (but perhaps I'm just blind).
If I browse to
C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.4\Resources\LensProfiles\1.0\Nikon
I do see a file called:
NIKON D3X (Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 28-300mm f3.5-5.6 ED VR) - RAW.lcp
However this profile is not available to me within Lightroom. I only have a handful of lens profiles available as follows:
I'm sure that I'm doing something dumb, but any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Steve

Lens profile created for raw files aren't available (can't even be seen in list) when editing non raw files (e.g. jpg) and vice versa. Check that this isn't the reason in your situation.

Lens profile for the Canon 24-70 II?

There isn't any Lens Profile available for download for the new 24-70 II and the 5D III.
Has anyone used the profile for the Mark I? And, how long before new profiles usually show up at the Adobe site?
Thanks
Mark

It's now in the LR 4.3 release candidate
I installed the release candidate on a separate PC, found the lens profile file in the install folder and copied tge file to the appropriate folder in my 4.2 install.

LR 5.4 and embedded Fuji lens profiles -- true or not?

Hello there, I have just bought LR 5.4 and was looking forward to using it with my Fuji X-T1. The camera is supported by I can't find any lens profiles for the XF lenses. I saw on the Web LR apparently used embedded lens profiles found in the RAW files. Is this true? If so, how does it work and why are there unofficial lens profiles available via the lens profile downloader? What benefit do these offer?

Photoshop CC and ACR 8.4 have a way to see when a built-in profile is used, and yes the newer Fuji cameras have built-in lens profiles. Lens Profiles can correct chromatic aberration, geometric distortion and vignetting. Sometimes a built-in profile only corrects some of those, so a downloadable profile could be adding a correction the built-in one doesn't do, or improving on it in some way.
Here is an example of the built-in profile for an X100S correcting for CA and vignetting but not geometric distortion, so it could make sense that another profile could be built to correct for the latter.
My understanding is that the built-in profiles correct for the same issues as the camera does for its own JPGs, and any external profile is for additional corrections.

Lumix G1 Lens Profile

does anyone have a lens profile for lumix G1 with 14-45 and 45-200 lens, created from adobe lens profile creator?
Thanks

Hi tgutgu
I wondered too why there are no lens profiles available for Lumix G lenses.
But what i do not understand is, why are there lens profiles for Nikon, Canon etc.? Why do they not embedd the correction parameters to their lenses like Panasonic does it? (and so you have to use and activate the preinstalled profiles?)
And why Lumix G users can not deactivate the lens correction to compare the resulting difference?
Kind regards,
Roman.

Lens profiles in imported tiff's

Raw files have all the lens profiles available, however, when I import tiff's I created in a 3rd party HDR program, when I choose lens profiles, it only shows a small handfull of profiles. I need the profile for my Canon 16-35 but the closest I can find is the 17-40.
How do I add the 16-35 profile?
[email protected]

Bob, you would need to make a profile.
However, surely it would be better to apply lens corrections to RAW images before subjecting them to HDR treatment?
Tony Jay

Lens profile for Sony E 35mm 1.8

When will the profile for this lens be added to LR? The 35mm F1.8 has been out for a while and it is one of the best and most popular E mount lenses for the NEX cameras. I was hoping to see it in LR5, but unfortunately it's not. I was surprised to see the profiles for the new Carl Zeiss 32mm and 12mm 'Touit' lenses that just came out last month. What does it take for a lens profile to be added? Is there a particular page where we can submit requests or is it just whenever Adobe feels like?
Thanks.

Hi,
Did you try the lens profile downloader? http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5492

Lens profile for sony sel10-18 in lightroom 4.3?

I've just downloaded lightroom 4.3 but can't find a lens profile for the sony sel 10-18mm e mount lens. Can I import this profile?

You can download these :
Frans

The new Sony DSC-RX10 Lens Profile does not appear in the Enable Lens Profile Develop Module.

The new Sony DSC-RX10 Lens Profile does not appear in the Enable Lens Profile Develop Module.
The wrong lens F3.5/6.3 profile is checkmarked and I can not find the new RX10 Sony 70-200 F2.8 G SMM11 profile. The meta data in the Library module correctly list the Sony RX10 and the Correct lens.
How may I select the correct lens profile for my Sony DSC-RX10?

Ask in the PS/ LR/ ACR forums
Mylenium

SONY RX100M3 LIGHTROOM 5.5 LENS PROFILE

Hello team, does anyone know how to obtain the Sony RX100M3 lens profile for Lightroom 5.5? I have been scouring the Internet for a solution but have not been able to find anything yet. There must be a way - would really appreciate your help with this! Thanks in advance.

rogerking wrote:
Hi there... Is this verified? I believed that camera profiles were simply colour profiles that allowed development of the RAW files. I have not been able to find information anywhere that suggests that the profile contains an automatic lens correction. There wasn't one for the RX100 or m2. I created ones for it using the Adobe Lens Profile Creator and it seems to work fine. I use Autopana to make panoramas and stretching the output from Lightroom without an additional lens profile for any RX100 proves very difficult which suggests there is still significant distortion. After correction using my created profile they stitch fine, though this may be a fluke.
Not sure if I can upload lens profiles here, but I would be happy to share both the RX100/RX100m2 and the RX100m3 profile. The RX100/m2 one is available from the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader, but despite me uploading the m3 profile, it has not yet appeared on the profile list in the tool. Perhaps that *does* imply that none is needed, but it would be nice if they'd let me know...
Hi,
It is totally unnecessary to have a separate lens profile as if you see my reply from Jul 28, 2014 12:48 PM the lens adjustments are included in the default profile as Sony provide the correction information in the RAW file.
To test it open the RAW file with another RAW processor that doesn't have lens correction capabilities and you will see the difference.
If you notice when you open in ACR or Lightroom where it says "Enable Profile Corrections" it says "Default" as it is supplied by Sony and it is not a removable lens camera.
The corrections are applied no matter what.

Sony: Lens Profile Creator knows the subject distance, ACR does not

When making a lens profile for a Sony alpha DSLR, lens profile creator identifies the focus distance, and processes each distance accordingly. However, when loaded in ACR (or PS lens correction filter), the software does not display the distance. Why can LPC read the subject distance and ACR cannot?

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
el_floz wrote:
The Creator, however, determines / calculates the subject distance itself.
Is this a complicated way of saying "God only knows"?
In all seriousness, if one program can calculate a piece of info from a file, so could another. The designers may just not have chosen to dig so deeply into the manufacturer-specific data as to do so. Or, as appears to be the case here, the information is derived from known subject material in the image itself.
-Noel

Sony AF 35mm F1.4 G Lens Profile Available

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for