Sorry, There was a technical problem. Please try a...

Here's the thing.
1. Goto ANY nokia regional website, and navigate to:
Device software update \ Can I update?
2. Enter ANY legitimate Product code
3. Get the following message:
"Sorry, There was a technical problem. Please try again soon."
There are NO announcements, or forum news entries, no notifications of downtime etc..
Many people (like myself) are trying to get nokia users on their feet and I think we'd appreciate a headsup.
Please give details, eta etc..
Tnx,
~VV~
Solved!
Go to Solution.

forum.dailymobile.se...Also its not totally unfounded rumors. Nokia already announced before that they will release Symbian^3 this year and Symbian^4 next year and MeeGo was announced as likely this year or next. Not to mention circulating pictures of a phone with the same aesthetic design of the N8 but has a sliding four row qwerty keyboard.
If you find my post helpful please click the green star on the left under the avatar. Thanks.

Similar Messages

I cannot reply to email on Outlook. No specific error message. "Sorry looks like there was an error. Please try again."

I am not able to reply to any email in my Outlook Inbox. It doesn't matter if it's a new email or one I've already opened. I get no specific error message, just "Sorry looks like there was an error. Please try again."

Boot from the Leopard DVD (I assume you are installing Leopard since you've posted in the Leopard forum.) After the installer loads select your language and click on the Continue button. After the menu bar appears select Disk Utility from the Utilities menu. After DU loads select your hard drive entry (mfgr.'s ID and drive size) from the left side list then click on the Partition tab. Select one partition from the drop down Partition menu, set the format type to Mac OS X Extended (Journaled) from the Format drop down menu. Click on the Options button and be sure the partition map is set to GUID (GPT) then click on the OK button. Click on the Partition button. After the partitioning has been completed quit DU and return to the installer. Proceed with installing OS X.
If you choose to install Tiger follow the same procedure as above except boot from the OS X Installer Disc One that came with the computer (assuming that is Tiger.)

Safari - Facebook: "There was a temporary error, please try again. Click to send again."

Hi all,
I have a macbook 15 (Late 2008) with 10.6.8 running + Safari 5.1.10 and I have experienced two problems with the Facebook chat:
1. Often (but I would say almost always) the chat window is cut below and I cannot visualize the box where to type my messages.
2. Today I have installed the FacebookVideoCalling_v1.6 to perform video calling, and what I am not able to send messages, but I always got the error: "There was a temporary error, please try again. Click to send again." Nevertheless, by following the suggestion to try later, does not solve the situation.
Does anyone experienced the same problem?
If it can be useful, I have some additional info. This the Java version I have:
java version "1.6.0_65"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_65-b14-462-10M4609)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.65-b04-462, mixed mode)
And here is what I got under the menu "Developers" (the screenshot is in italian, but I guess it is easy to understand it. Some translation: Svluppo = Develop, Mostra = Show, Abilita = Enable, Disabilita = Disable)
Any hint? Thanks!

Hi Damian,
You can follow the article: Creative Cloud Help | Download Error in Apps tab of Creative Cloud Desktop Application which will help you to get your issue fixed.
Let us know if it still gives you any issues.
Thanks,
Ratandeep Arora

I am getting error when hovering on document in sharepoint online "sorry there was a problem and we can't open this document.If this happens again, try opening the document in Microsoft Word"

I am getting error when hovering on document in sharepoint online "sorry there was a problem and we can't open this document.If this happens again, try opening the document in Microsoft Word".I am sure that document is not corrupted and
all. something it showing the preview and sometimes it throwing this error. I hope this error is intermident. When clicking on the link also it throws this error but on refreshing it working fine. I dont know why it is happening. Please helpme to resolve
this issue.

Hi Waqas
Thanks for your help with this. I had a look at both posts, the URL works fine from the WAC server and I am not using a System account to test docs.
Also, this is a production site that is accessible over the Internet, so we are using https therefore the WOPIZone is external-https.
Issue #3 in the above blog link does not reflect the same error I see on my servers.
I also had a look at the information in this link: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff431687.aspx#oauth
Problem: You receive a "Sorry, there was a problem and we can't open this document" error when you try to view an Office document in Office Web Apps.
If you added domains to the Allow List by using the
New-OfficeWebAppsHost cmdlet, make sure you’re accessing Office Web Apps from a host domain that’s in the Allow List. To view the host domains in the Allow List, on the Office Web Apps Server open the Windows PowerShell prompt as an administrator and run
the Get-OfficeWebAppsHost cmdlet. To add a domain to the Allow List, use the
New-OfficeWebAppsHost cmdlet.
I have not added any domains to the Allow list so this did not help either. Should I add the domain?
Any further help with this is much appreciated.
Thanks again.
Yoshi

Office Web Apps 2013 - Sorry, there was a problem and we can't open this document. If this happens again, try opening the document in Microsoft Word

Hello
I had configured Office Web Apps for SharePoint 2013 which was working fine for about 2 months until this morning.
The error message I get for WORD, PDF and Excel files is:
The ULS logs on the WFE give me this:
WOPI (CheckFile) Proof Data: AccessToken Hash '1572676699' [1054 bytes], URL
01/08/2014 11:01:58.01*   w3wp.exe (0x1368)                          0x09B4   SharePoint Foundation
    WOPI                             afk59   Monitorable
WOPI                             agxqc   Medium     WOPI Signature verification
attempt failed with public key 01/08/2014
11:01:58.01    w3wp.exe (0x1368)                          0x09B4   SharePoint Foundation
    WOPI                             agxqc   Medium     WOPI
Signature verification attempt failed with public key
01/08/2014 11:01:58.01    w3wp.exe (0x1368)                          0x09B4   SharePoint Foundation
    WOPI                             agxqb   Medium     WOPI
Signature verification attempt failed - no public key   e75ead18-af27-4d44-ba50-b38b408011e8
01/08/2014 11:01:58.01    w3wp.exe (0x1368)                          0x09B4   SharePoint Foundation
    WOPI                             ahdzz   Monitorable   WOPI
Proof: All WOPI Signature verification attempts failed   e75ead18-af27-4d44-ba50-b38b408011e8
01/08/2014 11:01:58.01    w3wp.exe (0x1368)                          0x09B4   SharePoint Foundation
    WOPI                             ag7pj   Unexpected   WOPI
(CheckFile) - Invalid Proof Signature for file Letterhead Template.docx url: http://site.contoso.com/_vti_bin/wopi.ashx/files/9c5d0d7077aa43e9a9538c02deb57580?access_token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOi
The ULS Logs on my Office Web Apps server gives me this:
Error message from host: Verifying signature failed, host correlation:    d197d187-ef9d-42f6-ae4f-c4b8199c1078
WOPICheckFile,WACSERVER FileNotFound
WOPI CheckFile: Catch-All Failure [exception:Microsoft.Office.Web.Common.EnvironmentAdapters.FileUnknownException: WOPI 404
Any idea what may have caused this issue all of a sudden?
Thank you.
Yoshi

Hi Waqas
Thanks for your help with this. I had a look at both posts, the URL works fine from the WAC server and I am not using a System account to test docs.
Also, this is a production site that is accessible over the Internet, so we are using https therefore the WOPIZone is external-https.
Issue #3 in the above blog link does not reflect the same error I see on my servers.
I also had a look at the information in this link: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff431687.aspx#oauth
Problem: You receive a "Sorry, there was a problem and we can't open this document" error when you try to view an Office document in Office Web Apps.
If you added domains to the Allow List by using the
New-OfficeWebAppsHost cmdlet, make sure you’re accessing Office Web Apps from a host domain that’s in the Allow List. To view the host domains in the Allow List, on the Office Web Apps Server open the Windows PowerShell prompt as an administrator and run
the Get-OfficeWebAppsHost cmdlet. To add a domain to the Allow List, use the
New-OfficeWebAppsHost cmdlet.
I have not added any domains to the Allow list so this did not help either. Should I add the domain?
Any further help with this is much appreciated.
Thanks again.
Yoshi

Issue with office web apps sorry, there was a problem and we can't open this document.

Hi All,
i am having issue when trying to open the word file using office web apps farm. i have multi-tier farm (2 wfe, 2 apps and 2 owa). is that something wrong with certificate or the way AAM configured. Can anyone give me some direction please?

Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is that you failed to open the word file using office web app.
Please open the word file using office web app in other SharePoint sites and test whether this issue occurs. Also, please test whether all words have this issue.
Please reset IIS on the OWA server.
Please disconnect the SharePoint Farm from Office Web Apps and reconnect it. Then check the WOPIZone and TMG server.
Please created certificate for your PC and update mappings of IP addresses.
Some useful posts for your reference:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/fdbf2198-5a62-422a-9015-a65599eabeb5/office-web-apps-2013-sorry-there-was-a-problem-and-we-cant-open-this-document-if-this-happens?forum=sharepointadmin
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/154e9673-8227-4913-9f2a-97677e4c5314/sorry-there-was-a-problem-and-we-cant-open-that-document?forum=sharepointadminprevious
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/66013/a-problem-with-a-websites-security-certificate-for-apps
Best Regards,
Dean Wang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Sorry there was a problem checking your details.

Hi,
When I go to run the broadband speed test on the BT website it says. Thought it was the website at first as it started doing this the other day.
Sorry there was a problem checking your details. Please check you have entered the correct telephone number and then press 'Start Test' again.
Then this:
Sorry, but we've not been able to match all of your details
You can continue and run our download speed test now, but please note that we will only be able to offer you a limited assessment on the meaning of your results.
Yet it will let me continue and do the test anyway. Any Ideas?
Thanks

FAQ
1. Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
Download Speed
55.44 Mbps
0 Mbps
57.38 Mbps
Max Achievable Speed
Download speedachieved during the test was - 55.44 Mbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speedsis 45.9 Mbps-57.38 Mbps .
Additional Information:
IP Profile for your line is - 57.38 Mbps
2. Upstream Test: -provides background information.
Upload Speed
8.5 Mbps
0 Mbps
20 Mbps
Max Achievable Speed
Upload speed achieved during the test was - 8.5Mbps
Additional Information:
Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 20 Mbps
We were unable to identify any performance problem with your service at this time.
It is possible that any problem you are currently, or had previously experienced may have been caused by traffic congestion on the Internet or by the server you were accessing responding slowly.
If you continue to encounter a problem with a specific server, please contact the administrator of that server in the first instance.
Please visit the FAQ if you are unable to understand the test results.

There was an error after each try of posting new message. Sorry for multi copies.

There was an error after each try of posting new message. Sorry for multi copies of question about put blob to OS

There was an error after each try of posting new message. Sorry for multi copies of question about put blob to OS

[SOLVED] "Sorry, that didn't work. Please try again."

Hi,
I installed arch 3 days ago based on the wiki's Beginner's Guide and Whitson Gordon's excellent (if slightly outdated) install guide over at lifehacker. First of all, I would just like to say that overall, my experience with this distribution has been positive. I love the principles behind arch, I love the emphasis on end-user education and participation. But while the documentation here is very helpful for the most part, I have been unable to do one thing: connect to wireless networks.
My laptop is a Dell Inspiron 1545, with the Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g LP-PHY (rev 01) wireless card. Having used several different flavors of Debian in the past, I am well aware of the hoops that need to be jumped through to get Broadcom chips up and running. This part was actually pretty easy with the AUR and pacman.
I downloaded the b43-firmware package from (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21690) here, built and installed it smoothly. I'm using NetworkManager in the GNOME desktop, and I can see all of the nearby wireless networks from the icon's interface. I read NetworkManager's (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ne … figuration) wiki entry and carefully followed the configuration instructions.
However, when I try to connect to my home network, upon entering my password, I get the message "Sorry, that didn't work. Please try again." and I'm returned to my desktop (yes, it's the correct password; I typed it out in an open terminal window and copied and pasted, just to be absolutely sure).
I tried taking my laptop to a friend's house and connecting to her network, (she's running Ubuntu, if by some bizarre chance that at all matters in any way) and got the same problem. Both networks are WPA encrypted, and, thinking that that was where the problem was, read and followed directions from the wiki entries for (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/WPA_supplicant) WPA-supplicant, double-checked the (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Broadcom_wireless) Broadcom Wireless page to see if I missed any related details, and re-read the entire (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Network) Configuring Network page looking for a solution.
I have read numerous threads in this forum, googled through related threads in the forums of other distributions as well, but I simply cannot find a solution that will let me work this out.
I'm asking for help here from any other Broadcom WPA users who have had and solved this same problem, and also from any experienced archer who can maybe spot something stupid I've done going through the installation and set-up process.
If there is any step of my setup that needs clarifying, or if there is any output I can drop here to shed light on the situation, please reply or send me an email. If there is any documentation that you think I might have missed, you could just post that here as well. I just want very much to get to the bottom of this problem.
thanks very much arch community,
-Clay
Mod edit: I broke the text up for you to make it better readable. It will be really tl;dr otherwise.
Last edited by clay.reynolds (2011-10-27 21:49:59)

clay.reynolds wrote:Well, any sense of accomplisment or technical fluency I felt when I completed the arch installation is shot now.
I'm just an idiot, thank you for demonstrating that, Strike0. Root password dismissed the networking settings permissions prompt that I had confused for the router's security prompt, wireless is working fine now.
Also, thanks for that formatting help, bernarcher. I'll try to keep my posts better organized in the future. :]
I just thought id mention that something like this happens to all of us at one point- dont feel bad
Got stick with it and learn what you can..

HT2105 Continually get a message saying "We are experiencing technical difficulties, please try later" when trying to set up allowances. Not very helpful. Any ideas. I am running the latest itunes with Windows 7 Professional.

Continually get a message saying "We are experiencing technical difficulties, please try later" when trying to set up allowances. Not very helpful. Any ideas. I am running the latest itunes with Windows 7 Professional.

Not a solution yet, but received the following from one of the tech people I've been e-mailing back & forth with.
"I'm sorry that you have been unable to submit your podcast. The podcast submission form is currently offline. When trying to submit the podcast you will receive this message "We are Currently Experienced Technical Difficulties". Once the issue has been resolved, I would be glad to inform you.
Apple is currently working toward a resolution for the issue you have reported. You will receive an email after the matter has been investigated and further information is available."
Who knows, maybe the problem isn't with my feed after all.

"filename.pdf" failed to export to Microsoft Word. There was an unexpected problem.

"filename.pdf" failed to export to Microsoft Word. There was an unexpected problem.
Every time i have tried to convert a pdf file to doc file I had this message.
Could someone help please.

Try disabling the OCR function of ExportPDF to see if it helps with your conversion. You can find instructions on how to do this here: http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-3062
-David

Hi, the fire fox browser shows the letters in separate when i embed the Farsi fonts in a site, while there was not such problem in the previous versions of fire fox browser. thank's

<blockquote>Locking duplicate thread.<br>
Please continue here: [[/questions/867506]]</blockquote>
Hi,
the fire fox browser shows the letters in separate when i embed the Farsi fonts in a site, while there was not such problem in the previous versions of fire fox browser.
good luck

The same topic exists. Try visit the link below (The problem hasn't been solved yet):
* [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/863157 Unconnected Embed Farsi Fonts]
Please continue it there...

We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. please try again late

Hello,
Since i got my new iMac and transferred itunes library i'm not able to active Genius because everytime i try i get this message "we are currently experiencing technical difficulties. please try again later" and this before 3 months and still getting this, i don't believe apple have technical difficulties for 3 months !
i update for new iTunes 10.2.1 and still getting error, please need help, is it problem with my itunes store account? because my ping account get disabled by apple for some reasons (it was first day and i renamed to steve jobs, dont try this :P)
Regards

Try using the Migration Assistant to move your stuff. If you do that with your iTunes/Music, it will work seamlessly (at least it has in my experience )

IDEFRAG FAULT: There was a hardware problem accessing your volume

Idefrag stops defragging when arriving at the following block and gives this warning:
There was a hardware problem accessing your volume (e.g. bad block or loss of power) and Idefrag cannot continue. The File that Idefrag was working on was: /Previous/Library/Logs/DirectoryService/DirectoryService.server.log -
What can i do?
Now i cant finish defragmenting. Only the compact defrag level > cuz this scan level only restore the empty blocks. All the other levels it stops defragging.
Please help

iDefrag may well have damaged your system. No such third party utility is required, or even adviseable, on OS X which does such things by itself.
I would recommend a reinstall from your recovery partition.
Defragmentation in OS X:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1375 which states:
You probably won't need to optimize at all if you use Mac OS X. Here's why:
Hard disk capacity is generally much greater now than a few years ago. With more free space available, the file system doesn't need to fill up every "nook and cranny." Mac OS Extended formatting (HFS Plus) avoids reusing space from deleted files as much as possible, to avoid prematurely filling small areas of recently-freed space.
Mac OS X 10.2 and later includes delayed allocation for Mac OS X Extended-formatted volumes. This allows a number of small allocations to be combined into a single large allocation in one area of the disk.
Fragmentation was often caused by continually appending data to existing files, especially with resource forks. With faster hard drives and better caching, as well as the new application packaging format, many applications simply rewrite the entire file each time. Mac OS X 10.3 onwards can also automatically defragment such slow-growing files. This process is sometimes known as "Hot-File-Adaptive-Clustering."
Aggressive read-ahead and write-behind caching means that minor fragmentation has less effect on perceived system performance.
Whilst 'defragging' OS X is rarely necessary, Rod Hagen has produced this excellent analysis of the situation which is worth reading:
Most users, as long as they leave plenty of free space available , and don't work regularly in situations where very large files are written and rewritten, are unlikely to notice the effects of fragmentation on either their files or on the drives free space much.
As the drive fills the situations becomes progressively more significant, however.
Some people will tell you that "OSX defrags your files anyway". This is only partly true. It defrags files that are less than 20 MB in size. It doesn't defrag larger files and it doesn't defrag the free space on the drive. In fact the method it uses to defrag the smaller files actually increases the extent of free space fragmentation. Eventually, in fact, once the largest free space fragments are down to less than 20 MB (not uncommon on a drive that has , say only 10% free space left) it begins to give up trying to defrag altogether. Despite this, the system copes very well without defragging as long as you have plenty of room.
Again, this doesn't matter much when the drive is half empty or better, but it does when it gets fullish, and it does especially when it gets fullish if you are regularly dealing with large files , like video or serious audio stuff.
If you look through this discussion board you will see quite a few complaints from people who find that their drive gets "slow". Often you will see that say that "still have 10 or 20 gigs free" or the like. On modern large drives by this stage they are usually in fact down to the point where the internal defragmentation routines can no longer operate , where their drives are working like navvies to keep up with finding space for any larger files, together with room for "scratch files", virtual memory, directories etc etc etc. Such users are operating in a zone where they put a lot more stress on their drives as a result, often start complaining of increased "heat", etc etc. Most obviously, though, the computer slows down to a speed not much better than that of molasses. Eventually the directories and other related files may collapse altogether and they find themselves with a next to unrecoverable disk problems.
By this time, of course, defragging itself has already become just about impossible. The amount of work required to shift the data into contiguous blocks is immense, puts additional stress on the drive, takes forever, etc etc. The extent of fragmentation of free space at this stage can be simply staggering, and any large files you subsequently write are likely to be divided into many , many tens of thousands of fragments scattered across the drive. Not only this, but things like the "extents files", which record where all the bits are located, will begin to grow astronomically as a result, putting even more pressure on your already stressed drive, and increasing the risk of major failures.
Ultimately this adds up to a situation where you can identify maybe three "phases" of mac life when it comes to the need for defragmentation.
In the "first phase" (with your drive less than half full), it doesn't matter much at all - probably not enough to even make it worth doing.
In the "second phase" (between , say 50% free space and 20% free space remaining) it becomes progressively more useful, but , depending on the use you put your computer to you won't see much difference at the higher levels of free space unless you are serious video buff who needs to keep their drives operating as efficiently and fast as possible - chances are they will be using fast external drives over FW800 or eSata to compliment their internal HD anyway.
At the lower end though (when boot drives get down around the 20% mark on , say, a 250 or 500 Gig drive) I certainly begin to see an impact on performance and stability when working with large image files, mapping software, and the like, especially those which rely on the use of their own "scratch" files, and especially in situations where I am using multiple applications simultaneously, if I haven't defragmented the drive for a while. For me, defragmenting (I use iDefrag too - it is the only third party app I trust for this after seeing people with problems using TechToolPro and Drive Genius for such things) gives a substantial performance boost in this sort of situation and improves operational stability. I usually try to get in first these days and defrag more regularly (about once a month) when the drive is down to 30% free space or lower.
Between 20% and 10% free space is a bit of a "doubtful region". Most people will still be able to defrag successfully in this sort of area, though the time taken and the risks associated increase as the free space declines. My own advice to people in this sort of area is that they start choosing their new , bigger HD, because they obviously are going to need one very soon, and try to "clear the decks" so that they maintain that 20% free buffer until they do. Defragging regularly (perhaps even once a fortnight) will actually benefit them substantially during this "phase", but maybe doing so will lull them into a false sense of security and keep them from seriously recognising that they need to be moving to a bigger HD!
Once they are down to that last ten per cent of free space, though, they are treading on glass. Free space fragmentation at least will already be a serious issue on their computers but if they try to defrag with a utility without first making substantially more space available then they may find it runs into problems or is so slow that they give up half way through and do the damage themselves, especially if they are using one of the less "forgiving" utilities!
In this case I think the best way to proceed is to clone the internal drive to a larger external with SuperDuper, replace the internal drive with a larger one and then clone back to it. No-one down to the last ten percent of their drive really has enough room to move. Defragging it will certainly speed it up, and may even save them from major problems briefly, but we all know that before too long they are going to be in the same situation again. Better to deal with the matter properly and replace the drive with something more akin to their real needs once this point is reached. Heck, big HDs are as cheap as chips these days! It is mad to struggle on with sluggish performance, instability, and the possible risk of losing the lot, in such a situation.

I tried downloading a free app and it asked for my billing information and when i entered it, it says that there was a billing problem with a previoud purchase and i have to update it. I keep updating it and it wont let me verify it and i cant get apps

I tried downloading a free app and it asked for my billing information and when I entered it, it said that there was a billing problem with a previous purchase and I have to update it. I keep updating it and it wont let me verify it and I cant get any apps even if they are free, and I just Deleted some apps to make room for my new upate!

The message says: "The payment method has been denied, try another method"
I'm living in the same country and city since I was born, so I don't think the location is the problem.
And yes, I paid with the card a meal in Burguer King today. And nothing more.

Sorry, There was a technical problem. Please try a...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for