Sorting on one-to-many relationship with JPA criteria API

I'm having some trouble using JPA criteria API with collection references.
I have an entity called Competence that has a one-to-many relation to CompetenceName that contains names for Competence for several languages.
[Competence.java]
@OneToMany(mappedBy="competence", cascade=CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval=true)
private List<CompetenceName> competenceNames;
[CompetenceName.java]
@ManyToOne @JoinColumn(name = "competence_id", referencedColumnName = "id")
private Competence competence;
@ManyToOne @JoinColumn(name = "lang_id", referencedColumnName = "id")
private Language language;
@Basic @Column(name = "name", length = 50)
private String name
Now I want to load 200 Competence-entities and sort them by their name (depending on the language of the logged in user). How would this be done using the JPA Criteria API? With a normal query, I would accomplish this with
"SELECT DISTINCT c FROM Competence AS c LEFT JOIN c.competenceNames AS cn ORDER BY cn.name"
Obviously, CompetenceName could contain zero entries for a Competence, but it works anyway with a normal query. With criteria API, it would look something like:
CriteriaQuery<Competence> cq = cb.createQuery(Competence.class);
Root<Competence> competence = cq.from(Competence.class);
competence.fetch(Competence_.competenceNames);
cq.select(competence).orderBy(cb.asc(competence.get(Competence_.competenceNames).get(CompetenceName_.name)); // Doesn't work
Is this even possible to do without creating a normal query?
Edited by: 812655 on Nov 24, 2010 2:32 AM

// Doesn't workWhat does not work? What error do you get?
You need to use "join" to define a join.
CriteriaQuery<Competence> cq = cb.createQuery(Competence.class);
Root<Competence> competence = cq.from(Competence.class);
Join<CompetenceName> name = competence.join(Competence_.competenceNames);
cq.orderBy(cb.asc(name.get(CompetenceName_.name));
The "fetch" will do a fetch join, if you also wish to load the data in the same query.
James : http://www.eclipselink.org

Similar Messages

  • One-to-many relationship with php

    I want to use a list of items that give related items in a grid, for example a list of days with a grid displaying students who attend on each day. I hve trwled the internet, but don't see any examples of this relationship in Flash Builder (4.6).
    Can anyone point me in the right direction? I am writing an appplication that uses php services to a mysql db.

    // Doesn't workWhat does not work? What error do you get?
    You need to use "join" to define a join.
    CriteriaQuery<Competence> cq = cb.createQuery(Competence.class);
    Root<Competence> competence = cq.from(Competence.class);
    Join<CompetenceName> name = competence.join(Competence_.competenceNames);
    cq.orderBy(cb.asc(name.get(CompetenceName_.name));
    The "fetch" will do a fetch join, if you also wish to load the data in the same query.
    James : http://www.eclipselink.org

  • 'One' To 'Many' relationship, (with the 'One' shared between persistance object graphs)

    Hi,
    I'm relatively new to JDO. So I need some verification on my program design.
    When creating a new Persistence Object I'm using a 'Builder' design pattern
    to check the database for an object that equals the new objects bean
    parameters(Via a JDOQL query). If it finds a matching one it loads it
    otherwise it creates a new instance.
    This way I have common objects between Persistence Object graphs. And there
    is not repeated common objects in the database.
    Is there a better way?
    regards
    Graham Cruickshanks

    // Doesn't workWhat does not work? What error do you get?
    You need to use "join" to define a join.
    CriteriaQuery<Competence> cq = cb.createQuery(Competence.class);
    Root<Competence> competence = cq.from(Competence.class);
    Join<CompetenceName> name = competence.join(Competence_.competenceNames);
    cq.orderBy(cb.asc(name.get(CompetenceName_.name));
    The "fetch" will do a fetch join, if you also wish to load the data in the same query.
    James : http://www.eclipselink.org

  • One to Many Relationship Issue

    Post Author: jmb1977
    CA Forum: Formula
    I am having a problem in which I have a one to many relationship with contact phone numbers and students. In other words, one student can have multiple contacts. (I work for a school district)
    I made up two formulas...called Contact1Phone and Contact2Phone.
    Here is the code I use to display the data:
    IF {STUDCTCT.CNTNUMBER} in &#91;"C1"&#93; THEN STDUCTCT.CNTWPHONE
    Then the other formula does the same, except uses "C2".
    What I get is either C1 or C2 displays, but never both for the same student. Anyway to make this work? Any help on this would be greatly appreciated!

    Post Author: jmb1977
    CA Forum: Formula
    I forgot to add, I do know that placing STUDCTCT.CNTNUMBER in &#91;C1,C2&#93; as a selection then just simply place the CNTWPHONE field into the details section of the report will give me the results. But the reason why I am trying it the other way is that I can export the data as one record per student, thus I am trying to put the fields and formulas into the group section.

  • One-to-Many implemented with a join Table

    Hello,
    Is it possible to implement a One-to-Many relationship with a join table, just like
    the Reference Implementation does.
    Regards,
    Jeroen

    "Jeroen Ferdinandus" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:
    Is it possible to implement a One-to-Many relationship with a join
    table, just like the Reference Implementation does.Not with our CMP, you will have to resort to BMP for that.
    Cedric

  • ADF One to Many relationship

    I'm a bit confused on how to create one to many relationships with ADF. Let's say I have a make and model table. One make can have many models. Now let's say I create a Business Facade like this (I'm using JavaBeans):
    public Collection getMakes () { ... }
    Ok, my data control now has the collection for makes. And I want to do something like this
    public Collection getModels (Make make) { ... }
    I can't make this work because ADF will detect it as a method accesor. How does this work?
    Regards,
    Néstor Boscán

    Maybe looking at how TopLink does it, can help you.
    Try creating TopLink objects for a master detail set of tables (dept-emp).
    This will create two beans that should be similar to your beans. Look at their structure to see how they work.
    The ADF TopLink workshop has the steps to show you how to do this.
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe9051jdev/ide1012/adfworkshop/buildingadfapplicationsworkshop.htm

  • Techniques to eliminate ripple loading in one to many relationships

    Hi,
    In my domain model, I have a class O that has a one to many relationship with class M. The relationship is mapped in TOPLink as a one to many from O to M, and a one to one from M to O.
    An end user logs into our application that has an otherwise cold TOPLink cache and executes a use case that will render several to many aspects of each O instance, and there are many O instances to render a majority of the time.
    The first time a question is asked of an O instance that requires its M instances to answer the question, TOPLink will detect the unstubbing of that ValueHolder, and cause a SQL query to pull in the necessary M instances for that O instance.
    One technique to combat this ripple load is to mark the relationship between O and M to "useBatchReading". I am motivated to attempt a different technique in the particular scenario I am experiencing though.
    Another technique would seem to be to fetch all of the M instances for all of the O instances to be rendered, compute the relevant Collection of M instances for each O instance and then call mValueHolder.setValue(readCollectionOfMs) on each O instance. Is this technique feasible? Seems like it doesn't align with the intent of the TOPLink API.
    Are there any other techniques that can be used to solve this issue as well?
    Thanks,
    Doug

    Doug,
    What I believe you want is join and batch reading configured on the queries of your specific use case. That gives you much finer control then configuring these on the mappings.
    With TopLink you should have your use cases issue a fixed quantity of SQL statements irrelevant of the # of objects returned from the root query.
    Have you taken a look at the performance tuning chapter in the documentation?
    I hope this helps,
    Doug

  • Struggling with a one to many relationship in a sub-report

    Post Author: Scott_tansley
    CA Forum: General
    I have a database schema as per below: tblENQUIRY                 tblDatasheets                  tblReportParasIRSID (PK)       1 --> &  IRSID (FK)                       UID (PK)Attribute1                     SHEETID (PK)     1 > &  SHEETID (FK)Attribute2                     Attribute1                         LIST_ORDER                         tblStandardParasAttribute3                     Attribute2                         PARA_CODE (FK)    & < 1   CODE     (PK)etc...                            Attribute3                                                                     TEXT                                   etc...
    The PROBLEM I am a Crystal Reports Newbie, and having to work through things bit by bitu2026  I've managed to achieve quite a lot, but I'm totally stuck with this and would appreciate some help. I need to create a report (essentially a letter and some datasheets) around a one-to-many relationship, which I have managed to compile using a main report (for the one &#91;tblENQUIRY&#93;) and sub report (for the many &#91;tblDatasheets&#93;).  Essentially I need a covering letter, then the u2018manyu2019 datasheets, and then a number of other pages (which are largely static text). I have created a main report which includes the covering letter, holds a subreport for the datasheets, and then contains the text for the additional pages.  This all works fine, and I get the correct number of datasheets for each main report. My problem stems from the use of this sub report.  This sub-report needs to hold some attribute values for each datasheet, which is fine.  However, on each datasheet page I need to have some paragraphs, which are held in another one to many relationship.  Each datasheet may have up to six paragraphs held as a code in tblReportParas, with a relationship to the text as held in tblStandardParas. My original thought would have been to embed another sub report, containing the values from tblStandardParas!TEXT, into the first sub report.  However, I have found that it is not possible to have a sub-report inside another sub-report.  I had seperated the first sub-report out from the main report, and then embedded another sub-report into it.  This worked fine until I tried to stitch the sub-report back into the main report (at which point the sub-sub-report dissapeared from view). I have therefore reworked my sub-report a little, and the attribution is now stored in a pageheader, with the tblStandardParas!TEXT in a detail section below it.  This almost works! The only problem is that there is no relationship between the pageheader and detail sections.  To clarify, I would expect to have one datasheet, with the attribution at the top, and then the six paras below.  Then, the same on the next page (assuming there is a second datasheet) for that report.  Instead, I get the correct attribution, but the detail section actually gives every paragraph in the database, no matter which datasheet/or report it related to!  I therefore need to limit the detail section to only show those paragraphs where the SHEETID in tblReportParas is the same as the tblDatasheets SHEETID. Any offers of advice would be appreciated.

    Post Author: Scott_tansley
    CA Forum: General
    I managed to resolve this myself in the end.  I moves the tblEnquiry data into report header/footer sections, this allowed me to add the tblDatasheets information into the details section, which gave me multiple pages - and then finally, the Paragraphs were added through the use of a sub report. 
    There's probably an even better way, but for now it works, it's quick - and so I'm going to go with it!
    Thanks for your interest.

  • One-to-many relationship: problem with several tables on the one side...

    Hello
    I'm having problems developing a database for a content management system. Apart from details, I've got one main table, that holds the tree structure of the content ("resources") and several other tables that contain data of a particular datatype ("documents", "images", etc.). Now, there's one-to-many relationship between "resources" table and all the datatype tables - that is, in the "resources" table there's "resource_id" column, being a foreign key referenced to the "id" columns in the datatype tables.
    The problem is that this design is deficient. I can't tell form the "resource_id" column from which datatype table to get the data. It seems to me that one-to-many relationship only works with two tables. If the data on the one side of the relationship is contained in several tables, problems arise.
    Anybody knows a solution? I would be obliged.
    Regards
    Havocado

    Hi;
    A simple way may be create a view on referenced tables:
    Connected to Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0
    Connected as hr
    SQL>
    SQL> drop table resources;
    Table dropped
    SQL> create table resources(id number, name varchar2(12));
    Table created
    SQL> insert into resources values(1,'Doc....');
    1 row inserted
    SQL> insert into resources values(2,'Img....');
    1 row inserted
    SQL> drop table documents;
    Table dropped
    SQL> create table documents(id number, resource_id number,type varchar2(12));
    Table created
    SQL> insert into documents values(1,1,'txt');
    1 row inserted
    SQL> drop table images;
    Table dropped
    SQL> create table images(id number, resource_id number,path varchar2(24));
    Table created
    SQL> insert into images values(1,2,'/data01/images/img01.jpg');
    1 row inserted
    SQL> create or replace view vw_resource_ref as
      2    select id, resource_id, type, null as path from documents
      3      union
      4     select id, resource_id, null as type, path from images;
    View created
    SQL> select * from resources r inner join vw_resource_ref rv on r.id = rv.resource_id;
            ID NAME                 ID RESOURCE_ID TYPE         PATH
             1 Doc....               1           1 txt         
             2 Img....               1           2              /data01/images/img01.jpg
    SQL> Regards....

  • JPA one to many relationship and serialization

    Hi,
    I modeled a one to may relationship like this:
    Parent Class WFData:
    @OneToMany(mappedBy = "wfData", targetEntity = Positionen.class)
    private Set<Positionen> positionen;
    Child Class Positionen
    @ManyToOne
    @JoinColumn(name = "WF_REF_ID", referencedColumnName = "ID")
    private WFData wfData;
    Now I want to create an EJB session bean with a method which returns an object of type WFData (parent) published as web service . When I try to deploy the web service I get the following error message: Unable to generate serialization framework for web service
    Does anyone know how to serialize a one-to-many relationship so I can use these objects in a web service?
    Best regards,
    Kevin

    I found the solution to get serialization correctly working and enable the service to be used in Visual Composer.
    You need to add the tag @XmlTransient to the getter method of the attribute in the child class that references the parent.
    @XmlTransient
    public WFData getWfData() {
        return wfData;

  • Toplink one to many relationship

    I am working on DAO layer for One to many relationship
    how can we get the list child objects based on parent id..
    we are using toplink ...

    Hi,
    If you are using with JPA, try this:
    em.createQuery("select c from child c where c.parent.id = :id").setParameter("id", parentObject.getId())
                                                                                           .getResultList();

  • One to Many Mapping with different SQL types

    We have an interesting one to many relationship in our system in which the source and target field SQL types do not match, but the values do. The relationship is actually between multiple entries in the same database table. So, imagine we have some table that looks sort of like this:
    KEY ObjectID OwnerNo
    100 1234     0
    101 ABCD     1234
    102 EFGH     1234ObjectID is defined as a varchar type, but Parent entries are guaranteed to have integer value ObjectIDs. Child entries point to the parent through the OwnerNo field, which defined in the database as a numeric.
    A simple one-to-many mapping will give you the following SQL error on execution: [SQL0401] Comparison operator = operands not compatible.
    I tried modifying my descriptor after load as follows:
       public static void modifyOneToMany(Descriptor descriptor)
           ExpressionBuilder builder = new ExpressionBuilder();
           Expression exp = builder.getField("OwnerNo").
              equal(builder.getField("ObjectID").toNumber());
           descriptor.getMappingForAttributeName("children")
              .setSelectionCriteria(exp);
       }But this introduces two problems in the generated SQL ( ... WHERE ((t0.OwnerNo = TO_NUMBER(t0.ObjectID) ... ). First, this generates a where clause using the function TO_NUMBER, which is not supported by DB2 on AS400, our database platform. Second, the table reference is off in the generated SQL--I couldn't find a way to specify that the right hand side of the = operator should be from the parent of the one to many mapping--both sides are referenced from the child context (t0).

    I found the getFunction() method on Expression, so I can solve half of this problem with the following code:
       public static void modifyOneToMany(Descriptor descriptor)
         if (descriptor.getMappingForAttributeName("children").isOneToManyMapping())
           OneToManyMapping map = (OneToManyMapping) descriptor.
                                  getMappingForAttributeName("children");
           DatabaseField objectID= (DatabaseField) map.getSourceKeyFields().get(0);
           DatabaseField ownerNo = (DatabaseField) map.getTargetForeignKeyFields().get(0);
           ExpressionBuilder builder = new ExpressionBuilder();
           Expression exp = builder.getField(ownerNo).getFunction("CHAR").
                            equal(builder.getField(objectID));
           map.setSelectionCriteria(exp);
       }This generates the following where clause:
    ... WHERE ((CHAR(t0.OwnerNo) = t0.ObjectID) ...
    But, I still have two questions:
    1. How do we get the right hand side of this comparison to reference the Parent part of the 1-M mapping?
    2. Since character and numeric conversions are pretty standard SQL functions, is there something wrong with the DB2 database platform I'm using?

  • Persisting an instance of the many side of a in one to many relationship

    It seems as if most books only tell you how to setup the relationship for a one to many relationship but seems to fail to tell you the appropriate way to persist in this relationship. So, I have a parent class with many child classes. Also, I am using services and so I am converting from Entities to Dtos and visa versa.
    First, i want to insert a new child for the parent. Do I just convert the child Dto to a child entity and then persist the child entity with the reference to the parent? Then do I find the parent and add the child to the parents children so the entities are consistent?
    Or do I do a find on the parent and add the child to the parents children list and the child. Will the child be persisted automatically?
    With this said, what about updating a child? Do I remove the existing child and add a new one? or do I somehow find the child in the parents children set and update the info there and then somehow the child is persisted automatically? And since I am using Dto to entity, do I use a find to find the parent and then iterate through that parents children til I reach the child I modified by id somehow.
    What about Many to Many relationships? With a middle join table? How does JPA know to remove a join if I change the child reference? Does it remove the old and insert the new? Or do I have to do it myself somehow. Which if the later then I really can not have a parent child Dto I really need a parent childlink table where the child is referenced by the linktable? The book I have been reading has not made this very clear.

    Hello,
    The relationships cascade settings determine what should happen. I would not recommend persisting a new entity that references a non-managed entity. Instead either persist the child then make the associations or find the parent, make the associations then persist the child. In the second case, you do not need to explicietly persist the child if the parent->child relationship is marked cascade persist, since it will be found on flush or commit.
    Since you are using DTOs, updates require you merge the changes. You can directly merge the child, and if it has a link to its parent, modify the parent to add the child on the managed child that gets returned.
    As for ManyToMany, you must modify the side that controls the relationship. So if the parent owns it, then you must modify or merge the changes into the parent for the changes to be persisted to the database. If it is bi-directional, you must modify both sides so that the cache remains consistent with the database. This should be transparent to your application, and you only need an entity for the relation table if you want to map more complex information that doesn't fit into the JPA ManyToMany options. Otherwise, JPA should handle inserting and deleting enteries to the relation table for you.
    Best Regards,
    Chris

  • How to change the fetch size for a one-to-many relationship

    With Toplink 10.1.3, since using scrollablecursor is a prerequisites for changing the fetchsize on a query (using the setFetchSize), I am wondering if it would be possible to change the fetchsize of the query which is associated to a one-to-many relationship.
    So, is this possible? How ?

    In TopLink 10.1.3 you can set the fetch-size on any query, it has nothing to do with using a ScrollableCursor.
    Example:
    readQuery.setFetchSize(100);
    To set the fetch size on a mapping query use,
    mapping.getSelectionQuery().setFetchSize(100);
    In 10.1.3 you can only set this in code, not currently through XML or the Mapping Workbench. In 10.1.3.1 you should be able to set the value through XML as well.

  • Newbie: one to many relationship SQL error

    Greetings all-
    This is probably a slam dunk for you JDO experts. I'm a JDO newbie, working
    with an existing schema in MySQL. I have a one to many relationship between
    two tables:
    Table "company":
    Fields:
    company_id: int(11) -- primary key
    name : varchar(64)
    division : varchar(64)
    Table "company_products"
    Fields:
    company_id: int(11) -- foreign key to table company
    product_name: varchar(64)
    product_description: varchar(64)
    So, I created the corresponding classes:
    public class Company {
    private int companyID;
    private String company_name;
    private String division;
    // Array of CompanyProduct
    private ArrayList companyProducts;
    // .. methods omitted
    public class CompanyProduct {
    private int companyID;
    private String productName;
    private String productDesc;
    // Methods omitted
    Then I created the "package.jdo" file:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <jdo>
    <package name="com.packexpo.db">
    <class name="Company">
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="table" value="company"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="pk-column" value="company_id"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="lock-column" value="none"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="class-column" value="none"/>
    <field name="companyID">
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="data-column" value="company_id"/>
    </field>
    <field name="name">
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="data-column" value="name"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="column-length" value="64"/>
    </field>
    <field name="division">
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="data-column" value="division"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="column-length" value="64"/>
    </field>
    <field name="companyProducts">
    <collection element-type="com.packexpo.db.CompanyProduct"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="inverse" value="companyID"/>
    </field>
    </class>
    <class name="CompanyProduct">
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="table" value="company_product"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="pk-column" value="company_id"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="lock-column" value="none"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="class-column" value="none"/>
    <field name="companyID">
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="data-column" value="company_id"/>
    </field>
    <field name="productName">
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="data-column" value="product_name"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="column-length" value="64"/>
    </field>
    <field name="productDesc">
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="data-column"
    value="product_description"/>
    <extension vendor-name="tt" key="column-length" value="64"/>
    </field>
    </class>
    </package>
    </jdo>
    Enhancement works fine. I successfully query and retrive Company objects
    from the database, but as soon as I try to get the list of CompanyProducts,
    I get an SQL Error:
    javax.jdo.JDODataStoreException: [SQL=SELECT company.COMPANYPRODUCTSX FROM
    company WHERE company.company_id = 82061]
    E0610 Error in executeQuery()
    E0606 executeQuery() error --
    E0701 Error in getResult().
    E0708 Command results in error - 1054 Unknown column
    'company.COMPANYPRODUCTSX' in 'field list'
    NestedThrowables:
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.sql.SQLExceptionWrapper: [SQL=SELECT
    company.COMPANYPRODUCTSX FROM company WHERE company.company_id = 82061]
    E0610 Error in executeQuery()
    E0606 executeQuery() error --
    E0701 Error in getResult().
    E0708 Command results in error - 1054 Unknown column
    'company.COMPANYPRODUCTSX' in 'field list'
    I know i have probably set up the package.jdo file incorrectly, but I'm at a
    loss for what I did wrong.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks!
    -Mike

    Hi,
    915766 wrote:
    I need to write sql for below requirement:
    table structure is
    serial no LPN
    1 4
    2 4
    3 6
    4 6
    5 6
    6 3
    7 3
    8 3
    9 1
    I have to pick distinct 'LPN' like below:That sounds like a job for "GROUP BY lpn".
    (any serial no can be picked for the distinct LPN)It looks like you're displaying the lowest serial_no for each lpn. That's easy to do, using the aggregate MIN function.
    results needs to be as below:
    serial no LPN
    1 4
    3 6
    6 3
    9 1
    Please suggest with sql.Here's one way:
    SELECT    MIN (serial_no)   AS serial_no
    ,         lpn
    FROM      table_x
    GROUP BY  lpn
    ORDER BY  lpn     -- if wanted
    I hope this answers your question.
    If not, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only), and also post the results you want from that data.
    Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
    Always say which version of Oracle you're using (e.g., 11.2.0.2.0).
    See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}

Maybe you are looking for