Speed limit on wrt54gs

Hi all.
I have 2 PCs connected to the net via my wrt54gs router, one through a cabale and the other one wirelessly. Is there any way to set the speed limit for the wirless or both PCs? Like make it 50/50 all the time.
Thanks.
Regards.

If you didn't prioritize any device, the router should already work that way. The wired connection is always going to be faster because it's wired.
The box said windows xp or better... So I installed Linux!

Similar Messages

A browser with download speed limit?

It sounds weird but on Linux I can't find a browser that allows to set a download speed limit.
I found an extension for Firefox but it works only on Windows.
I know the existence of download managers like d4x, wget, jdownloader, etc... but some downloads can only be done by browser.
I know trickle too but if I want to change the speed limit I have to 'restart' the command (interrupting the current download).
Then I didn't find an extension for Chromium.

I was able to implement [global] throttling with wondershaper. You will need to modprobe sch_cbq if you use the CBQ script (not sure about the HTB one). I use the CBQ version.

Speed limit

Hi!
My turn to ask a question. I read some- and everywhere the Athlon XP has a MHz limit of 2500. It seems to be so, but is it? I tried on my own to find an answer, and below is a result of that, but...
Why I don't ask AMD?! Before asking well-paid and intelligent people, I thought I should try the forum.
Speed limit
Athlon XP and Sempron reached a speed limit
The main difference between the socket A processor nowadays seems to be in the architecture of the cache memories. The speed does not pass 2500 MHz. Why is that?
The first Athlons came in 1999. Their advantages compared to their competitor are/were the number of pipelines and calculation units:
- Three decoders for translating the complex but fundamental CISC-instructions into RISC-instructions. The processor has no problem working with the short and simple RISC-instructions.
- Athlon can have 72 instructions simultaneously, (Pentium III 40, and the earlier K6 only 24).
- Very competent FPU:s, three of them, and as FPU is better at calculating decimal numbers than the main ALU, it makes Athlons good at 3D graphics – where there are lots of that kind of mathematics when producing polygons.
In the beginning Athlons had external Level 2 cache. The cache sat on a slot beside the processor, and the architecture was called slot 1. With XP this changed, both Level 1 and Level 2 cache were built into the processor, and we got the socket A kind. Athlon XP was also built with thinner lines connecting the transistors, and got the ability to handle new instructions, got a better data pre-fetch technology, and an overheating protection.
So what’s the problem? Speed it up!
Well, one bottleneck lies between the processor and the RAM memory, the Front Side Bus (FSB). The processor is much faster than the RAM and process data as they come by. To keep the processor busy mainly Intel invented a sort of pipeline, or ladder. The processor is working on every step.
Data is sent from hardware, like sound data or network data over the PCI-bus, graphics data over the AGP-bus, hard-disk data over the IDE (PCI-/SATA) bus, etc. The data comes in ones and zeroes in little packages, which make up complex instructions. For the processor to be able to efficiently perform the instructions they need to be sized down to simpler instructions, from CISC to RISC. (CISC codes is such a fundamental part of the PC history they must remain.) The sizing down is done in the very beginning of each pipeline. In later steps of the pipeline, the instructions are interpreted further and performed.
Early processors needed one clock-cycle per step in the pipeline, but Athlons can manage 2,5 steps, as can for example Pentium 4. With the pipelines, as said, Athlon XP can do 72 instructions at the same time. Pentium 4 however has longer pipelines – with 20 steps – and can process 126 instructions. But the efficiency of a Pentium 4 is lower, which is why Athlons are quicker at the same MHz. Apple’s (Motorola’s) G4 processor is yet more efficient.
Athlon XP has 10 steps in each pipeline for the “main” ALU processor and 15 for the FPU. The reason why there are not more pipelines is that the processor is not kept busy with the slower RAM, and a lot of clock-cycles would be wasted. What is more, there will be too many erroneous instructions, when the processor has to start over, filling the pipelines with correct instructions.
RAM is slower
This was not the case in the beginning. All ran at the same speed, say 20 MHz: Processor, FSB, RAM-memory, PCI-bus etc. By separating the PCI-bus, which had hardware connected that couldn’t work at higher frequencies, things could start moving.
In 1989 came a Pentium with clock doubling. To compensate for the not ‘doubled RAM, L1 cache was invented. But processors kept getting faster. Next thing to be pushed forward was the FSB, which for socket A boards now is increased to 200 MHz x 2 (DDR). Intel increased it even further, but as the efficiency rate isn’t increasing at the same rats, Intel has backed down from the megahertz spiral, and has followed AMD in other ways of thinking.
So is this the simple basic calculation?
Athlon XP:s can do 2,5 instruction per clock-cycle in 10 steps per pipeline x the number of pipelines. The number of pipelines is limited by the number of instructions sent and their quality, 72 instructions at the same time. Can this be the reason for 2500 MHz limit?

Ok, reality check people...
Sharp, nice explanation, but you are wrong.
the x86 instruction set (including those nice MUL, ADD and other instructions) is a CISC instruction set.
The difference? A MUL takes 12 cycles, a DIV 40 or something...
RISC was a new computing architecture. Each instruction is simpler to allow higher execution frequency.
The efficiency of a computer is judge by the work done. W= IPC x Freq
Frequency is the well known number that we can find on our beloved processors. IPC is the instructions per clock. Why is the athlon more efficient than a P4 at the same frequency? higher IPC.
How do the chip manufacturer choose those factors?
Well, the problem is that the instruction set is FIXED. x86 (or i386), the instruction set, has been defined years ago as CISC and to maintain compatibility, you have to keep it. They then included internal decoders to change those instructions to streams of RISC instructions, each simpler. Those are the ones really implemented.
How does that influence the speed of the processor? Each instruction is executed by a unit (integer unit, floating point, MMX...), the more that unit has to do for that imstruction, the more time it takes (and the more transistor). This has 2 problems:
- one is that it will limit the overall speed as the more complex the unit, the less speedy.
- The second is that it ties down the unit. If you do a div in 40+ clocks, your integer unit is tied during this time.
The answer to this problem? Pipelines.
Pipelines are splitting the tasks in simpler tasks and executing each as independant as possible.
Example: laundry. You need washer and dryer. However, some of your clothes cannot go to the dryer.
Now, you have 2 loads. If you have a combined unit that takes 1.5h for wash + dry, it will take 3h total.
If you have a washer (.5h) and a dryer (1h), you load the first load (.5h) then transfer it to the dryer (1h). While the drier works, you load the next washer (0.5h). If you need it to perform also the drier, total time is 2.5h instead of 3h. If you dont need it, it is even faster 1.5h.
This is the way intel followed. Prescott has a 25+ pipeline. The problem comes from branches. If you misspredict your branch, you have to flush the pipe.
All that to say that with its manufacturing and its architecture, AMD could not release a AXP even close to 2.5GHz. Can you overclock a good unit over that limit? Sure. Intel did not release a 4GHz and yet you can overclock some P4 up to 5GHz (with appropriate cooling).
Oh, and the technology used is 90nm or 0.09um. Athlon XP is not even that small, it was still on 130nm.
This is the smallest critical dimention (smallest trace. Usually smallest transistor width).

Linksys E1000 speed limit

Hello all!
I have connected my 2 computers to E1000 with cables and looks like router is setting up some speed limits. Does anybody knows how I can remove speed limit? Did not found any setting in Cisco Connect and Advanced settings
Before: speed ~100Mbps
After: speed ~72Mbps (never goes higher, very strong feeling that it is limited)

before - without connecting through router
after - after connecting through router
moment ago I tried both options
directly to my ISP - ~100Mbps
through router - ~ 72 Mbps
three times switched cable between both options and results are same

Getting European Speed Limit Signs in US

Is anyone else in the US getting a Euro Speed limit sign? Not a big deal I guess.

Hope that you have used the in app feedback form as detailed here: http://conversations.nokia.com/2013/05/28/the-here-team-is-listening-to-you/
Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

FTP speed limit

Hi there,
Trying to figure out why my upload speed is so slow using FTP. I'm working on a 10/10 link full duplex and my speed tests are pretty good overall. My question is why my upload speed using FTP with my browser/explorer is around 150Kbps while the same
file on the same host using FileZilla goes aroung 900Kbps ?! While testing, I disable my AV just to be sure.
Did some research and found a buffer/speed limit on ftp command (ftp.exe /?). Could that be the explanation or am I missing something ?
Thank you

Just to clarify, some questions please:
Are you on a network?
By "Upload", you mean uploading a file over the internet, not within a LAN or WAN, right?
When you say the same file goes 900 kbps using FileZilla, you mean upload, not download, correct?
Also, what kind of internet connection do you have?
One possibility, based on what you've mentioned, is that the server you're uploading to has a maximum speed per connection. This is fairly common. Apps like FileZilla typically use multiple connections to increase download speeds; I haven't used
one in awhile but it's possible they can do this for uploads as well. So if the server you're uploading to has a speed limit of 150 kbps per connection, you'll never be able to get higher speeds unless you use a multithreaded client (like FileZilla).

Speed limit pb

Hello fellows!
I was asked to build a program that calculates the Fine when you exceed the speed limit.
When you exceed 120miles/h the fine is 100$ plus 10$ for every additional mile/h.
I wrote a code,but something is wrong with it. When you drive at the legal speed which is less than 120miles/h it still gives a fine of 100$.
import javax.swing.JOptionPane;
public class radar
     public static void main(String args[])
          String si,so="";
          int s,q,f;
          si=JOptionPane.showInputDialog("Enter the speed");
          s=Integer.parseInt(si);
               q=s-120;
          if ( q>0 )
               f=100+10*q;
               so+="The speeding fine is"+" "+f+"$";
               JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,so);
          if ( q<=0 )
               so+="You are in the legal speed.There is no fine to pay";
               JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,so);
          System.exit(0);
}This is the first time i'm using the (if) condition. So please tell me if there is something wrong with it.

Melechesh wrote:
When you exceed 120miles/h the fine is 100$ plus 10$ for every additional mile/h.Wow, where do you live? That's a pretty low fine.
>
I wrote a code,but something is wrong with it. When you drive at the legal speed which is less than 120miles/h it still gives a fine of 100$.What do q, f, si, so, s mean? Perhaps you could use more meaningful variable names.
perhaps you forgot to add { } to your if statements, otherwise only the first statement is conditional regardless of your indentation.

Ovi Maps 3.04 - Speed limit warner settings

Hi,
Can someone explain how to correctly set the options for the Speed Limit Warner on Ovi Maps 3.04? I'm kind of confused here...
Also, I would like to know how these options differ from the Safety Spot Warner option?
Thanks in advance!

Firstly select imperial or metric, then decide what speed over the limit you wish to activate the warning. Mine is set at 2mph up to 50mph and 3mph over 50mph. In drive mode the speed indicator (bottom left) shows green, but when exceeding 32mph in a 30mph area turns red and emits a warning. Subsequently in a 60mph limit, exceeding 63mph produces a warning. The map software detects the road speed limits, and this is an excellent safety feature. In respect of police safety cameras and mobile speeding units the general concensus is that a tolerance of 10% + 2mph is used to counter inaccurate speedometers. Also note that the speed displayed by the map is by GPS (more accurate than a speedometer). Hope this helps!

I am using an iMac7.1 with 1GB DDR2 SDRAM of speed 667 MHz on board memory. I would like to know what is my best option to upgrade to 4GB on board memory so that I can run Lion OS. Is there a speed limit of the DRAM I can use? Please recommend.

I am using an iMac7.1 with 1GB DDR2 SDRAM of speed 667 MHz on board memory. I would like to know what is my best option to upgrade to 4GB on board memory so that I can run Lion OS. Is there a speed limit of the DRAM use? Please recommend or suggest as soon as possible.

You can install 2 - 200-pin PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2 SO-DIMMs. The maximum amount of RAM is 6 GBs. Visit DataMem or OWC to get the proper RAM at reasonable prices.

Basic connection speed questions for WRT54GS v.4

Hi, and sorry, I am something of a network numpty (though I understand my pc pretty well)
My router only ever transfers data at 54mbps (according to the wireless network connection icon in the system tray) - so, what has happened to the speed booster increasing it to 108mbps? Is 54mbps the best I can get?
Is this 54mbps in each direction = 108 total?!
And, how does this then limit my broadband downloading speeds? I have a 20Mb connection, and get around 17Mb speeds on my desktop pc which is connected via an ethernet cable to the router. The laptop, connected by wireless, gets 6Mb max - is this being limited by the router's capabilities?

First of all, Speedbooster is a software enhancement to the router. It does not change the basic wireless g connection speed of 54 Mbps. The Speedbooster enhancement is supposed to give you a 10 to 20% boost in data throughput. In order to get the full benefit, both the router and your wireless adapter must have Speedbooster. If only the router has it, you still get a benefit, but not as much.
Under ideal lab conditions (read: not in an ordinary home) a wireless g system can deliver as much as 20 to 25 Mbps of data. Most home users get substantially less. Most home users are happy if they can get 50% of their wired speed (in your case, 50% of the 17 Mbps). Some have achieved as much as 80% of their wired speed.
Its possible that 6 Mbps might be all that your system will be able to do, but I would suggest that you try a few adjustments and see if you can improve it. Here are my suggestions:
First of all, give your network a unique SSID. Do not use "linksys". If you are using "linksys" you may be trying to connect to your neighbor's router. Also set "SSID Broadcast" to "enabled". This will help your computer find and lock on to your router's signal, and this can give a slight performance gain.
Poor wireless connections are often caused by radio interference from other 2.4 GHz devices. This includes wireless phones, wireless baby monitors, microwave ovens, wireless mice and keyboards, wireless speakers, and your neighbor's wireless network. In rare cases, Bluetooth devices can interfere. Even some 5+ GHz phones also use the 2.4 Ghz band. Unplug these devices, and see if that corrects your problem.
In your router, try a different channel. There are 11 channels in the 2.4 GHz band. Usually channel 1, 6, or 11 works best. Check out your neighbors, and see what channel they are using. Because the channels overlap one another, try to stay at least +5 or -5 channels from your strongest neighbors. For example, if you have a strong neighbor on channel 9, try any channel 1 through 4.
Also, try to locate the router about 4 to 6 feet above the floor, in an open area. Do not locate it behind your monitor or near other computer equipment or speakers. The antenna should be vertical.
Also, in the computer, go to your wireless software, and go to "Preferred Networks" (sometimes called "Profiles" ). There are probably a few networks listed. Delete any network named "linksys". Also delete any network that you do not recognize, or that you no longer use. If your current network is not listed, enter its info (SSID, encryption (if any), and key (if any) ). Then select your current network and make it your default network, and set it to automatic login. You may need to go to "settings" to do this, or you may need to right click on your network and select "Properties" or "settings".
If the above does not fix your problem, download and install the latest driver for your wireless card.
If you still have problems, try the following:
For wireless g routers, try setting the "Transmission Rate" to 54 Mbps. For wireless n routers, try setting the "n Transmission Rate" to 162 Mbps, and the (wireless g) "Transmission Rate" to 54 Mbps.
If you still have trouble, download and install the latest firmware for your router. After a firmware upgrade, you must reset the router to factory defaults, then setup the router again from scratch. If you saved a router configuration file, DO NOT use it.
Hope this helps. Please let me know your results.
Message Edited by toomanydonuts on 11-29-2007 02:35 AM

[solved] speed limit for pacman?

Is there a way in the configuration to limit the download speed of pacman?
Been reading the wiki but nothing relevant on that part
Last edited by akurashy (2009-08-19 22:03:29)

invictus51: welcome to the boards, please read the Forum Etiquette, particularly around:
* don't necro-bump http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … Bumping.27
* ...and if you do feel compelled to, at least avoid power posting http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … mpty_Posts
Closing

Set speed limit to network interface

Hi
I want build a program to set limit speed to my network interface
for example max download speed for wlan connection 10Kb
how must edit network interface for this work
i searched but can't found anything
thanks

Why would you want to do this?
It sounds quite suspicious to me.
Still lost in code, just at a little higher level.
i want save my monthly traffic
That doesn't make much sense. How will limiting the network speed do that?
If you limit the network speed to 20% of what it was then it will just take 5 times longer (more really due to the amount of overhead in data packets) in order to upload or download anything.
If you are on a plan which limits the amount of data via the plans network which can be uploaded and or downloaded during the plans payment time period then perhaps you should monitor the data transceived over the link during that time period.
Then write an app that turns off a NIC and will monitor the NIC so if it is enabled it is turned off again whenever some daily allowance of bandwidth is exceeded. Or perhaps write a service for that. Of course the app or service would need to know the pay
period to monitor, the amount of bandwidth provided for the pay period, constantly store bandwidth used (either sent, received or both) while the NIC is up and be designed to know for each day when to disable the NIC if necessary. And allow the NIC to be re-enabled
or re-enable the NIC when some time occurs following the previous disable of a NIC.
However you don't provide what the requirement would be other than you just want to limit bandwidth via some NIC. Which really means nothing unless multiple PC's are vying for bandwidth and you want on specific PC to be allocated more bandwidth than
any other PC or something.
Group Policy Editor has a setting that can apparently
limit reserveable bandwidth. I don't know if setting that to %95 would only provide applications %5 of the available bandwidth. I've installed GPE on my Win 7 Home Premium PC which it does not come
with and I had to find an installer from an untrusted source in order to do that.
Recently I had a friend using a Verizon WIFI device which provides local WIFI for PC's via Verizons cell service I suppose. Apparently if the PC was left on and nobody was using it then bandwidth was used. I believe in about one 6 hour time period over %15
of the entire pay periods bandwidth allowance was used when his girlfriend let the PC on unattended. So I could see where some type of monitor app would be nice for a situation like that.
When you use few words to describe anything the result is everybody having to guess. And with regard to what you think you want to do it makes the entire thread a guess.
La vida loca

Speed limit on users

I have a server which acts as a vpn server, and I want to limit the maximum speed of clients. How can I do this?
I need a solution which works for both OpenVPN and Strongswan with thousands of clients.
What are my options?

I have googled a lot and had no success.
It seems that tc is the only option, but I have to mark every ip address with iptables to go to a specific classid. But I was unable to mark them. I have tried both MARK and CONNMARK. If anyone can help me to mark a packet (or a connection) it would really help.
But I am also looking for other options. Because with htb there is a 10000 limit on the number of classids; and I have a /16 subnet for my vpn which supports 65535 users!

Help! Extremely slow Internet speed using Linksys WRT54G router

I have an eMac running OS 10.3.9 and wired to a Linksys WRT54G router using ethernet cable. I have to use this router for my work PC. I'm also using WildBlue satellite internet. The problem is, I'm getting about 1.5 Mbps on my PC, but less than 33 Kbps on my eMac. It was running faster before using dial-up. I've called WildBlue and Linksys tech support, and they can't help. Can anyone help?
By the way, my son is using his iBook on the same router, only wireless, and he's happy with the speed he's getting compared to dial-up.
Thanks,
Eric

1400 kbps is a lot nicer than 33 kbps, isn't it? You can possiblly tweak it a little more --- I know I've seen a MTU of 1460 mentioned --- since you can also revert back to the 1400 MTU setting you found.
(Broadband Optimizer is in one sense a nice GUI to the terminal commnads you found and used.)
One more thing to be aware of, satellite internet is subject to longer latency times than cable or DSL, due to the unavoidable geometry of bouncing data packets off a satellite in orbit. That could be an issue if you ever want to play real-time online multiplayer adventure type games. It shouldn't be an issue for being able to grab OS updates in minutes instead of hours, through. Enjoy your broadband access!

Daq with PocketPC any speed limit ??

Hi ! HELP NEEDED !!!
i need to sample 12 chanels with 16ksamples/s ....
so its something like ... 200,000 ksamles/s ...
and make some Min/Max calculations ...
i want to use it with the PocketPC and the Daq 6024E .. and ofcourse LabView 7 ...
the speet limit of daq .. is 200,000 ks/s .. so its ok ..
but what PocketPC speed i need ??? (200Mhz, 300Mhz, 400Mhz) ... and if its actually possible to sample this speed on the PocketPC aplication ....
anybody tried ???
any body worked near the limits ???
what amount of memory needed ??? 64 mb enought ??
anybody ?? plz ??? :-)
its too pity to buy and to find that its not working ...
u can answere also to [email protected]

200KS/s on the 6024E should work fine on 200Mhz StrongARM and 400Mhz XScale CPUs. 200/300Mhz XScales will probably not be fast enough. You will need to download the 7.0f1 patch for LabVIEW and the PDA module to get this level of performance (and to support multichannel).
Due to various factors from both Windows CE and LabVIEW PDA, using the high-level multichannel acquisition VIs in a default PDA install you should expect to be able to acquire somewhere around 10s of contiguous data at 200KS/s. This can be improved to 50s by various means including a lower-level usage of the DAQ driver code. If you require continuous acquisition, this is achievable but more difficult to program, and may not be able to operate stably at 200KS/s.
If you need more information a
bout said lower-level programming please msg me privately.

Speed limit on wrt54gs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for