SPICBOOKING: Intercompany Booking Rules

Hi Guys,
I searched a lot for previuos threads, but had no success: that's why I' asking your help.
In order to have a proper Legal IC Elimination we:
1. Wrote a simple Intercompany Booking Rule with one debit and one credit account and loaded Application in order to have suitable data to be eliminated.
2. Created the necessary Script Logic (based on SPICBOOKING Stored Procedure) to be called in a DTS
3. Creted a DM Package
In the Log (DataPackage View Details) we see no data has been generated: Revenues and Costs are still there. In the help we can get:
Intercompany booking rules are split into two independent procedures:
SPICDATA: This procedure can be used to copy the declarations of all entities versus a given entity by intercompany account. Essentially, it concentrates into each single entity the declarations of all other entities versus each entity. This mechanism allows the owners of an entity to run a report matching all its declarations against what the rest of the world has declared against the entity, without the need to assign to each owner read permits into other entities.
SPICBOOKING: This procedure can be used to automatically generate the bookings which will make the intercompany declarations to match. The stored procedure SPICBOOKING is driven by the table called clcBOOKING_.
The following table describes the options for setting up an intercompany booking rule.
What's wrong? Did we miss something?
Did anybody of you used Intercompany Booking Rules successfully?
Can you please share your experience about?
Thanks in advance
GFV

Hi Tara,
thanks for your answer. We are working in a little bit different way. In fact we wrote a new ScriptLogic (that should run SPICBOOKING ...) and then invoked such a Script Logic within a new DTS.
We tried with your own code, and then wrote in our Script Logic:
*RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE = SPICBOOKING([LEGALAPP],[ACTUAL],[2008.JAN],[EUR],[TOTALADJ])
*COMMIT
We kown this is not working with parameters ... but this is a secondary problem for the moment.
When we execute the DM Package associated to the DTS (that invokes our Scrip logic) we get the following messages:
Building sub-query 1
Query Type:0
Max members:
Executing SPICBOOKING [LEGALAPP],[ACTUAL],[2008.JAN],[EUR],[TOTALADJ]
Time to run stored procedure:.3 sec.
call 1 completed and data posted in 0.3 sec.
Run completed in 0.4 sec.
End time --->12:15:43 PM  -  Date:11/19/2008
Is that right? According to us it should also report the number of records read and written? Does your BPC work in the same way or do you get also the number or records involved?
Anyway may be we wrote wrong Intercompany Business Rules: the meaning of each field is still unclear to us ... For example, considering the fields available, and the Help indications (very poor in this case):
Parent matching account: A parent account member from the Account dimension or DIMLIST. Is it mandatory? what is the purpouse of this field?  
Booking destination data source: A DataSrc member. We setted AJ_ELIM
Max booking amount: The maximum amount authorized to book. Mandatory?
Debit account: An Account member. We indicated a INC Account loaded with the appropriate IntCoL
Debit flow: A Flow member. F_NONE for us ... but is it mandatory?
Debit intco: An Intco member or blank. BLANK
Credit account: An Account member. We indicated a EXP Account loaded with the appropriate IntCoL
Credit flow A Flow member. F_NONE for us ... but is it mandatory?
Credit intco: An Intco member or blank. BLANK
How did you managed these fields?
Thank you very much for your cooperation: I hope we will be successfull!
GFV

Similar Messages

  • Intercompany Booking & SPICDATA (SAP-BPC)

    Hi there,
    I'm trying to adapt our system for intercompany booking using the How To posted on sdn wiki. Could someone put some light on whats mandatory for this functionality to work? We would like to use our AccountL dimension enhancing it with the IC hierarchy needed to perform the booking....but does it means I can use PARENTH3 property for that? and what's the effect of infroming PINTCO as 'S' in account dimension? and IC_ORIGINE member in Datasrc ?
    I suppose we can make it work just following the How To but I need to understand it in order to be addapt our system.
    Thanks in advance,
    Carlos.

    Hello,
    There is a How-To Guide in the wiki section of this site:
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BPX/EnterprisePerformanceManagement%28EPM%29How-to+Guides
    It's in the BPC 7.0 MS section and is called "How to Set-Up Intercompany Matching".
    You should first compare your application setup with the one contained in this guide. It should allow you to identify the missing settings (properties, etc.).
    Best regards,
    Julien

  • Business Rule Intercompany Booking

    Hi All,
    Does anyone know how should be filled the collumn "Parent Matching Account" in Intercompeny Booking Business Rule?
    Should have the values of property DIMLIST; ELIMACC from Account Dimension??  In our case we are using legal application also for intercompany matching (we don't have an intercompany application)
    If you can explain me with an eg, would help me a great.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Mónia Domingues

    Hi Monia,
    guess what ... I managed to FINALLY implement the ICDATA function! I debugged the ABAP coding for three hours and now found it ...
    What did I do to make it work:
    First of all, the ICDATA function did not work since I was using it for a planning application. For consolidation applications I wouldn't have had all these problems. (but now it also works for planning application)
    STEP1: I did not assigned the INTCO dimension on the entity dimension. This is needed, otherwise you will get 0 submitted, 0 success and 0 failed message in the log
    STEP2: the currency dimension should have property CURRENCY_TYPE. When working with the GROUP dimension this already is assigned by default, but for my RPT_CURRENCY dimension this was not the case, so I added it and assigned values R to EUR and USD and L to LC
    STEP3: implement OSS note 1395793 (SP06). This removed two bugs I came accross during debugging as well
    STEP4: Apperantly in my time dimension the TIMEID property (which normally I excpected to be filled automatically) was not filled up or all time members. As a result it did not take into account my time selecton when running the IC data pagckage.
    and this concluded it ... it works now!
    D
    my script:
    *RUN_PROGRAM ICDATA
    CATEGORY = %Category_SET%
    GROUP = %RptCurrency_SET%
    DATASRC = MANUAL
    TID_RA = %Time_SET%
    ENTITY = %Entity_SET%
    ACCOUNT = PAYABLES,RECEIVABLES
    TYPE = 'I'.
    *ENDRUN_PROGRAM
    The left-hand side of the equisations always should have the same statments. The right-hand side of the equisations depend on the dimensions used in your application

  • Account options - Refresh address books / rules range

    Hi Forum,
    sometime I get (annoying) calls that there are old users on distribution lists which are already deleted. They get an error message if they send mails to that list...
    So far I could always resolve that issue by simply refresh the system groupwise address book manually.
    My question now is how I could reduce the mentioned refresh range in the account options to 1 day e.g. via C1 or some other way (default is 7).
    Any suggestions? Thanks in advance :)
    Cheers,
    Pascal

    Hi Pascal,
    Firstly double-check that nightly user upkeep is running on your post offices. This process removes deleted accounts from personal address books.
    As far as changing the setting for a caching/remote mailbox to download address books every 1 day instead of the default of 7 days - I never found a way to automate this. We manage this manually. Fortunately for us, we the IT people, setup the caching mailbox for each user, so the process of changing this setting to 1 day is well documented.
    Perhaps there's a registry key - but I'm not sure.
    Cheers,

  • Intercompany Matching and Eliminations

    Hi All,
    We are trying to configure Intercompany Matching and Eliminations in application LEGAL following the docs: HTG Intercompnay Matching and BPC Intercompany Booking in Business Rules (both for MS Version), but we can't make any elimination (the status after run packages is Completed, but id didn't submit any data).
    We have the following configuration:
    DIMENSION ACCOUNT:
       ID  |   PARENTH1 | ACCT_TYPE   | ELIMACC
       2110A | |AST | PAYABLE
       2210A | |LEQ | RECEIVABLE
       IC_ACT| | AST
       PAYABLE| IC_ACT | AST
       RECEIVABLE | IC_ACT | LEQ
    Payable and Receivable are accounts to book intercompany differences.
    Do we need another property to identify accounts that belong to the scope of intercompany eliminations?
    DIMENSION ENTITY:
    ID | PARENTH1 | ELIM | INTCO
    E_TESTE
    1040 | E_TESTE | Y | I_1040
    1180 | E_TESTE |     | I_1180
    5560 | E_TESTE |     | I_5560          (we also tried with ELIM=Y for all the entityes but the result is the same...)
    We have the corresponding Intco's in dimension INTCO. 
    In dimension GROUPS (Type Currency) we have the member EUR with property REPORTING=Y. And in C_DataSrc dimension we have the member ICDIFF.
    BUSINESS RULE INTERCOMPANY BOOKING (2 lignes):
    Parent Matching Account: IC_ACT
    Type: Seller Rule
    Dest Dta Source: ICDIFF
    Max amount: 1000
    Debit Account: 2210A | PAYABLE
    Credit Account: 2110A | RECEIVABLE
    Debit/Credit FLOW: F_CLO
    Debit/Credit Intco: I_NONE
    SCRIPT ICDATA:
    *RUN_PROGRAM ICBOOKING
            CATEGORY = %C_CATEGORY_SET%
               CURRENCY = %GROUPS_SET%
               DATASRC = INPUT
               TID_RA = %TIME_SET%
               ENTITY = %ENTITY_SET%
               ACCOUNT =
               FLOW = F_CLO
               TYPE = 'I'.
    *ENDRUN_PROGRAM
    Does script ICDATA really should run ICBOOKING?
    SCRIPT ICBOOKING:
    *RUN_PROGRAM ICBOOKING
            CATEGORY = %C_CATEGORY_SET%
               GROUP = %GROUPS_SET%
               TID_RA = %TIME_SET%
               OTHER =
    *ENDRUN_PROGRAM
    We submitt the following data to the LEGAL Application:
    ENTITY | INTCO | C_ACCT | GROUPS | FLOW | DATA_SRC | CATEGORY | TIME         | AMOUNT
    1180    | I_5560 | 2210A    | LC           | F_CLO | INPUT         | ACT             | 2009.OCT |  -90
    1180    | I_5560 | 22800     | LC           | F_CLO | INPUT         | ACT             | 2009.OCT |  -300
    5560    | I_1180 | 2110A    | LC           | F_CLO | INPUT         | ACT             | 2009.OCT |  100
    5560    | I_1180 | 211AM   | LC           | F_CLO | INPUT         | ACT             | 2009.OCT |  300
    After input we run currency conversion, and then the packages ICDATA and ICBOOKING.
    The packages ICDATA and ICBOOKING run well (status success) but didn't submitt any data...
    Does anyone know if there is missing something or something wrong in the configuration?
    Anyone has ICDATA/ICBOOKING in NW version? Is there any other way to implement intercompany elimination?
    Any ideas, please?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Mónia Domingues
    Edited by: Mónia Domingues on Oct 27, 2009 12:37 PM

    Sorry. NOT CONSIDER THIS POST
    Edited by: Mónia Domingues on Oct 27, 2009 1:05 PM

  • Consolidation Business Rules

    Hi
    Can someone tell me the main purpose for each of the following business rules:
    Account transformation
    Currency conversion rule
    Intercompany booking
    Automatic adjustments
    Automatic adjustments details
    Carry-forward rules
    US Elimination
    Validation rules
    Validation rules details
    Would really appreciate the help. Also, would be great if anyone can send me some document specifically on consolidation rules and methods.
    Thanks
    Mav

    Hi Mav,
    Unfortunately there is no current documentation on Business Rules for 5.1.  The only documentation that is out there is the Admin User Guide, which you can download from SAP.  There is also the Consolidation Engine Referecnce guide for version 4.2 SP3, which goes into more detail regarding business rules.  I can send you a copy of this.  Just send me a note.
    Michael

  • Create Acctg Error: Intercompany balancing was unable to generate the inter

    hi,
    12.0.4
    Issue:
    There is an error in Create Acctg. of Cost management due to intercompany balancing was unable to generate the intercompany account. Please check the intercompany balancing rules setup.
    Ledger Star Appliance Center, Inc.
    Application Accounting Definition Cost Management
    Error Message
    Intercompany balancing was unable to generate the intercompany account. Please check the intercompany balancing rules setup.
    Ct uses Oracle AAD and are valid.
    Ct had the same offset account processed in other transactions and posted to GL, but some others have not been processed.
    The period close subledger exception report show that 17 events are unprocessed with error 0:
    0 Intercompany balancing was unable to generate the intercompany account. Please check the intercompany balancing rules setup.
    Offset 037.0249.1350.6005500.0000.8888.000000.000000
    Please advise how ct can process these 17 events in error.
    https://support.us.oracle.com/oip/faces/filedownloadservlet?ObjectType=SR&ObjectNo=3-5288562551&FileName=Create_Acctg_Output_Jan28_with_error.doc
    Thanks
    Jayashree
    Edited by: user763208 on 22/02/2012 19:36

    Unable to access the file, which is uploaded to SR.
    Please provide some of the error in Create Accounting file along with journal entry.
    Check whether the code comabination of intercompany journal line, which create accounting is trying to create to balance the balancing segment is valid or not.
    By
    Vamsi

  • Intercompany balancing was unable to generate the intercompany account in AP

    Dear all,
    I have an invoice in AP the status is validated but not accounted.
    I am having the following message
    "Intercompany balancing was unable to generate the intercompany account.  Please check the intercompany balancing rules setup"
    I have followed the steps in doc id 749579.1   but the issue has not been resolved.
    Grateful if anyone can provide me with a quick solution since this is preventing a period closure and the preparation of final accounts.
    Thanks

    Unable to access the file, which is uploaded to SR.
    Please provide some of the error in Create Accounting file along with journal entry.
    Check whether the code comabination of intercompany journal line, which create accounting is trying to create to balance the balancing segment is valid or not.
    By
    Vamsi

  • Intercompany Journals in GL

    Hi
    Could you give pointers on how intercompany journals are created in GL and what setups are required.
    Thanks

    Hi ,
    My requirement is to setup intercompany journal function through GIS in 11.5.10
    Though I've multiple books, for simplicity sake I'll discuss setup between 2 books only ( Book A and Book B both USD and using the same COA and calendar)
    Here are the following steps I performed.
    1.Setup a GIS book (Book GIS) with parent previliges
    2.Assign a GIS super user responsibility.
    3.Create Book A as subsidiary by logging into the GIS super user responsibility. in Subsidiaries window. The Intercompany book and local book refers to Book A.
    4.Create Book B as subsidiary . The Intercompany book and local book refers to Book B.
    5. Created 2 responsibilities one each for Subsidiary A and Sub B and assigned the appropriate subsidiary book in the profile option.
    6. Setup clearing accounts for Subsidiary A and B.
    7.Login as sub A and created sender side transaction. Then login in Sub B and entered receiver transaction, approved.
    8 Transfered into the respective books and could see the interco journals in book A and B.
    Now the question is
    1. Is it the correct setup for GIS ?
    2. What purpose does the 'Book GIS' satisfy. When I query for journals from that book using the journal find window , I don't see the interco-journals.
    Thanks

  • Intercompany segments in GL

    Hi
    In Oracle Apps, you can handle intercompany transactions in two ways.
    1. Having a separate 'Intercompany' segment in the Chart of accounts
    2. Setting up a separate intercompany account combination.
    Can any one tell me the advantages and disadvantages of each?
    Regards
    Ramaswamy

    Hi ,
    My requirement is to setup intercompany journal function through GIS in 11.5.10
    Though I've multiple books, for simplicity sake I'll discuss setup between 2 books only ( Book A and Book B both USD and using the same COA and calendar)
    Here are the following steps I performed.
    1.Setup a GIS book (Book GIS) with parent previliges
    2.Assign a GIS super user responsibility.
    3.Create Book A as subsidiary by logging into the GIS super user responsibility. in Subsidiaries window. The Intercompany book and local book refers to Book A.
    4.Create Book B as subsidiary . The Intercompany book and local book refers to Book B.
    5. Created 2 responsibilities one each for Subsidiary A and Sub B and assigned the appropriate subsidiary book in the profile option.
    6. Setup clearing accounts for Subsidiary A and B.
    7.Login as sub A and created sender side transaction. Then login in Sub B and entered receiver transaction, approved.
    8 Transfered into the respective books and could see the interco journals in book A and B.
    Now the question is
    1. Is it the correct setup for GIS ?
    2. What purpose does the 'Book GIS' satisfy. When I query for journals from that book using the journal find window , I don't see the interco-journals.
    Thanks

  • IC Questions

    Dear Gurus,
    I were learning about the intercompany using BPC 7M. The SAP BPC provides ICElimination script, SPICDATA & SPICBOOKING, US Elimination. I got SAP BPC documentation about SPICDATA & SPICBOOKING and not for others, I also read some threads about elimination. So, I have some questions as folllowing:
    1. What is different about SPICDATA & SPICBOOKING VS US Elimination VS ICElimination please ?
    2. Could someone share with me about what I should to prepare If I choosen US Elimation ? and if I choosen IC Elimation ?
    3. What the version of SAP BPC would support ICElimation script, SPICDATA &SPICBOOKIN, US Elimination ?
    Thanks a lot for your information and I really appreciate your information and suggestion.
    Best Regards,

    Hi,
    US eliminations functionality addresses the posting of intercompany US eliminations in scenarios where a full legal consolidation application is not required, such as within a standard financial application.
    The intercompany booking function supports the overall intercompany reconciliation process. It is split into two independent procedures:
    SPICDATA: This mechanism allows the owners of an entity to run a report matching all its declarations against what the other entities have declared against it.
    SPICBOOKING: This procedure can be used to automatically generate the bookings which will make the intercompany declarations to match.
    Both MS as well as NW version of SAP BPC support it.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards, Rishi

  • Emails from one account don't appear in the Inbox of Mail since upgrading to Mountain Lion

    I have a couple of email accounts - one is Gmail and one is a domain for my business. Previously Mail would show the Inbox and then a subfolder for each account under Inbox. Any messages received in the accounts would appear in both their own subfolder and also the Inbox. All my rules worked properly and life was good. Now, try as I might I cannot get my domain email account messages to show in the global/unified Inbox.
    Originally the domain email folder was totally separate to the Inbox. By changing the IMAP Prefix (removing 'Inbox') I was able to get the folder at least under Inbox.
    I purchased a new iMac and used Migration Assistant to move everything, therefore the problem persists. I had additional problems that my address book, rules and On My Mac folders didn't appear - but I solved that by finding the Containers folder and it is like a duplicate of Mail. I moved things from there to the Library/Mail and those particular issues resolved. But for the inbox issue, I have removed data from the Users/Library/Mail and from Library/Containers and started afresh - even deleted the Mail App and reinstalled from my original disc, but as soon as I set up the account it happens again.
    Recently I have also started receiving errors when sending to use the Connection Doctor. I don't know if all this is related to a bug in Mountain Lion, the way I have things set up, or my domain/ISP.
    Any suggestions on what to try, what it may be or ways around it would be great. I do have a Smart Mailbox for a Total Inbox, but of course the Rules don't work automatically on it. I'm getting sick of running Rules manually. Help please!!

    I called the support service and she told me to delete my email address and re-enter it. I have no problem since then on receiving and sending emails.

  • Standard Report for Credit Balance

    Hi,
    Is there any oracle standard report for the information of credit balance??
    We use customized report for this issue now, but I prefer to use the standard report in the future.
    I created a customer with credit limit of 1000 USD, and created an order for 10 USD and then booked.
    My Credit Rule is set at booking point.
    I need an report which shows the information about : credit limit is 1000 USD, 10 USD is in used, and credit balance is 990 USD.
    I have run Credit Exposure Report and Credit Limit Usages Report, which names are alike what I want, but Credit Exposure Report just show the overall credit limit without information about how much is in used (and exposure is 0 ?? , available is the same as overall credit limit which equals to 1000 USD.), the Credit Limit Usages Report show nothing.
    So, is there any other oracle standard report for the information of credit balance??
    Thanks in advance and
    best regards,
    Zhxiang.

    Hi Zhxiang,
    Exposure is the credit usage of the customer. The credit exposure report will work based on the credit check rule. So, in your case, check what the "Booking" rule is set as. The report will consider all the elements mentioned in the rule like open orders, open AR balance etc. The values which you see in the report are exactly the same ones which are used by the credit checking engine when it does a credit check. You can get some information in the user guides also for this report.
    But this is the report which you should be looking into for knowing the credit limit, credit used and credit available details.
    Regards,
    Swapna.

  • Plug accounts issues

    Hi guys,
    I'm not quite sure of having understand plug accounts and I have some issues with eliminations right now.
    I have tree accounts with the same plug account.
    Father1
    Child1- PlugAccount1
    Child2- PlugAccount1
    Child3- PlugAccount1
    PlugAccount1
    The application works with default consolidation. My problem is that the PlugAccount it's showing a weird resulta at some entity level. The entities are as follows:
    Entity0
    EntityA
    EntityB1
    EntityC1 EntityC2 (those are te IC partners)
    Plugaccount1 shows value in EntityB1 (the difference) and also in EntityA and Entity0. Is this usual? Should it roll out to all the parents? PlugAccount1 has value in EC, ECT, PC, PCT and Elimination... Is it right?
    I'd really appreciate your comments.
    Thank you!
    Lu
    Edited by: user6351237 on 13-dic-2011 22:59

    Hello
    If you want the elimination to work and you do not want to use the default rule you have to follow the next step
    1. In the app setting mark ConsolidationRule=Y
    2.Upload the consolidate rule, I am send in you an example in the last part of this mail
    3Entitys property isICP, flag Y in each entity that you are going to have intercompany transactions
    4Account flag s isicp for the plug account and the account that you want to have intercompany transactions
    The eliminations are going to appear in elimination in the child . SO it will not consolidate to the parent.
    I hope it help
    sofia
    Sub Consolidate() 'consolidation rules (if app does not use default this section is used to consolidate
    Dim MyDataUnit
    Dim lNumItems
    Dim dPCon
    Set MyDataUnit = HS.OpenDataUnit("")
    dPCon = HS.Node.PCon("")
    lNumItems = MyDataUnit.GetNumItems
    for i = 0 to lNumItems-1
    ' Get the next item from the dataunit
    call MyDataUnit.GetItem(i, strAccount, strICP, strCustom1, strCustom2, strCustom3, strCustom4, dData)
    ' See if this is a consolidatable account
    If HS.Account.IsConsolidated(strAccount) Then
    ' Proportionalize this account
    call HS.Con("",dPCon,"Proporción")
    ' see if we should eliminate this account
    call Eliminate(strAccount, strICP)
    End If
    next
    End sub
    Sub Eliminate (strAccount, strICP) 'intercompany elimination rules
    Dim CanEliminate
    Dim strPlug
    Dim dPCon
    CanEliminate = TRUE
    NegatePlug = FALSE
    If (StrComp(strICP, "[ICP None]", vbTextCompare) = 0) Then
    CanEliminate = FALSE
    ElseIf (HS.Account.IsICP(strAccount) = FALSE) Then
    CanEliminate = FALSE
    ELSEIF (HS.Node.ISDESCENDANT(HS.PARENT.Member,strICP,"") = FALSE) THEN
    CanEliminate = FALSE
    'ElseIf (HS.PARENT.ISDESCENDANT(strICP,"") = FALSE) Then
    'CanEliminate = FALSE
    Else
    strPlug = HS.Account.PlugAcct(strAccount)
    'HS.Parent.IsDescendant("I#[ICP Top]", "")
    If (strPlug = "") Then CanEliminate = FALSE
    End If
    If CanEliminate Then
    dPCon = HS.Node.PCon("")
    call HS.Con("V#[Elimination]",-1*dPCon,"Eliminacion interco")
    call HS.Con("V#[Elimination].A#" & strPlug,dPCon,"Eliminacion interco")
    End If
    End Sub

  • Improving search by allowing variations of a term

    Hi,
    I working on sharepoint site for a client. It has enterprise search enabled. On the search results page, I have enabled Stemming on Search Core Results webpart. After that I am able to search/get results for different variations of a terms.
    Problem is coming for concatenated terms like rule book. My client wants that if user searches for rule book, rules book, rule books, rulebook, rulesbook etc., it should consider these as synonyms and return same search result.
    One option is to use Thesaurus file and add all these terms in a expansion set. But it will become a large set with different permutations and combinations with spaces, w/o spaces, with hyphen, with "rules", with "books". Similarly, there are other business
    terms.
    Is there any option other than using Thesaurus file?
    Also, if there is no other option, what is the best way to add entries in thesaurus file w/o impacting performance.
    Thanks,
    Garima

    Using thesaurus seems only easy way here. You're right the file will get longer, please research on implications of this -
    http://code2care.org/pages/setup-synonyms-or-alias-or-thesaurus-in-sharepoint/

Maybe you are looking for

  • Scanning multiple pages to single file

    I have the HP Officejet Pro 8600.  I use to be able to scan multiple pages to one file.  For some reason now it separates the pages into single files.  Under advanced settings it looks like the option "create a separate file for each scanned page" is

  • Application Help in German

    Hello, One of our users when he clicks in Application Help, the browser starts SAP HELP in German language. This happens only for a couple of them and the rest of the user commuinty is having ENGLISH. Can any one suggest if it is any parameter settin

  • Finder freezes with Lion 10.7.4

    I've had my macbook pro with Lion 10.7.4 for only about 4 or 5 months now and since I installed a 2 TB Seagate external HD Finder has been crashing periodically. I've been keeping an eye on the Activity Monitor when this happens and it doesn't look l

  • How can I change the format of some of the pages of a PDF-document?

    I use Adobe Acrobat and have a PDF-document with A4 pages and some pages of another format (half of an A4). How can I change the format of these pages to A4 (with a lower blanc part)?

  • Reasons why I should get an iPhone

    Hi, I'm an eleven year old boy and I really need help convincing my family to let me get an iPhone. I really need reasons to justify it and anything would help. Thanks