SQ02 Infoset returns different results in SQ01 Query vs. Segment Builder TG

I want to get Segment Builder to use the same InfoSet and return the same results so, that I can then make a Target Group...but, I'm sure I'm missing some step along the way.
My SQ01 query returns 79 contact persons, but my segment builder only finds 42, none of which appear to actually be the Contact Person, but are in fact the Business Partner the Contact Person has a Relationship to.
I started by copying the CRM_MKTTG_BP_ADDR InfoSet and added the BUT051 table to it, which is when the SQ01 began returning the needed results.
I suspect the problem may be in the Master Group where I am using the B2B/B2C Program, but I don't know if that's the answer or not. I am not declaring an FM as I am using the BP-GUID in the data source, so I don't 'think' that's the issue...
Here's what I'm currently trying as my Data Source settings in case that will help:
Origin Type              03 InfoSet
RFC dest.
Name of InfoSet          ZCRM_MKTTG_BP_ADDR
Business Partner         BUT000-PARTNER_GUID
Function Module
Sampling InfoSet         ZCRM_MKTTG_BP_ADDR_SMP
Sample                   BUT000-PARTNER_GUID
Object
Partner Function
Description              Z BP Address
I already read every Segment Builder forum thread and the Sap Library on the subject, but either I missed something or there is a step not listed.
Anyone have any suggestions?

Solved!!
I was wrongly using AND/OR options to add filters in the segmentation tool...ups!

Similar Messages

To_char(adate,'dd.mm.yyyy')   returns different results from two oracle clients !!! Is it possible?

Dear all;
We have only one Database server with some IIS's   as web servers on front . Each web server has own oracle client software in order connect to central database..
The same following query used in C# code returns different results on each IIS server.(3 row, or not data found )
why?
select     *    from    aTable    where        to_char( adate , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) =   :search_date
regards
Siya

1006237 wrote:
If adate is of DATE datatype, it will most likely has the time component. Therefore your SQL below is unlikely to return any data.
select * from aTable where adate = to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy')
Perhaps.....
select * from aTable where TRUNC(adate) = to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy')
Hi,
not having any sample data from you I could not understand that you wanted to select the range 00:00:00 - 23:59:59 on search_date.
Your method might not be efficient if you have an index on adate.
Maybe something like this will be more efficient
select * from aTable
where adate >= to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy')
and adate < to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy') + 1;
If you search_date is 30-Aug-2013 it will get records where adate >= 30-Aug-2013 00:00:00 and adate < 31-Aug-2013 00:00:00, so any time of date 30-Aug-2013.
Try like this and let us know if you still have 2 different results.
Regards.
Alberto

Select statement returns different results from 9i and 10g

Hi all,
Would appreciate if someone could help to solve this puzzle here:
I have the exact the statements running on Oracle 9i and 10g, why do they return different results?
Select unique(GroupDesc) , GroupSeq from Module where ModuleId in (Select ModuleId from User_Access where UserId='admin') and Status='A'
In Oracle 9i:
Both columns returned as follows...
GroupDesc | GroupSeq
In Oracle 10g:
Only one column returned, the column with unique keyword was missing...
GroupSeq
Could anyone enlighten me?

yes, the table structure... actually the CREATE TABLE statement...
with some sample data (INSERT INTO)
and the actual queries (both of them - copy-paste them from each separate environment)
you can use tags around the statements this will format it to a fixed font - making it easier to read
Edited by: Alex Nuijten on Feb 20, 2009 10:05 AM

I need return the result of a query on a stored procedure

I need return the result of a query on a stored procedure, I mean when I execute a stored procedure it returns a result set as a select query.
Best regards...

If you want some pl/sql code that can be used in a query as it were a table you may be interested in table functions:
SQL> create or replace type
2 t_emp is object (
3 name            varchar2(30),
4 hire_date date,
5 salary       number);
6 /
Tipo creato.
SQL> create or replace type
2 t_emptab is table of t_emp;
3 /
Tipo creato.
SQL> create or replace function tab_fun(p_dept in number)
2 return t_emptab is
3 e t_emptab;
4 begin
5    select t_emp(ename,hiredate,sal)
6      bulk collect into e
7      from emp
8     where deptno=p_dept;
9
10    return dip;
11 end;
12 /
Funzione creata.
SQL> select *
2 from table(tab_fun(20));
NAME                           HIRE_DATE SALARY
SMITH                          17-DIC-80        800
JONES                          02-APR-81       2975
SCOTT                          09-DIC-82       3000
ADAMS                          12-GEN-83       1100
FORD                           03-DIC-81       3000A procedure cannot be used in a select statement.
Max
http://oracleitalia.wordpress.com

Returning Different Results Based on Input Criteria

I have a complex nested select statement. Based on selection criteria I want to return different results. Say for instance I had an input parameter Called Products which could contain a Yes/No Flag. If the Flag was Yes then I would want the "top" select, statement to be The following:
Select Product, Time_ID, Amt
From
My Complex Nested Select
But if Product was set to "No", I would want the following:
Select Time_ID, Amt
From
My Complex Nested Select
I know, or course that I can have two COMPLETE set of SQL which are invoked based upon testing the value of the PRODUCT Parameter, but If I duplicate the "inner nested select" then I have 2 sets of select staments to maintain. Is there an alternative to this? Could I make the inner portion which does not change a function of some sort so that my code would look something like this?
Select Product, Time_ID, Amt
From
Execute myNestedSelectFunction
But if Product was set to "No", I would want the following:
Select Time_ID, Amt
From
Execute myNestedSelectFunction
This would atleast ensure that I only have to go one place to maintain the logic of the "static Nested Select" statement.
Just want to make sure I do not have a real viable alternative to "duplicating code"
Thanks

Hi,
Look in TFM for PIPELINED functions which will allow you to:SELECT Product, Time_ID, Amt FROM TABLE(myPipelinedFunctionReturningSelectResult()) T;
SELECT Time_ID, Amt FROM TABLE(myPipelinedFunctionReturningSelectResult()) T;There are samples if you look on AskTom too.
Regards,
Yoann.

Oracle function and query return different results

Hi, I am using oracle 10g database.
Function is :
create or replace FUNCTION FUNC_FAAL(myCode number,firstDate date
*, secondDate date)*
RETURN INTEGER as
rtr integer;
BEGIN
select count() into rtr*
from myschema.my_table tbl where tbl.myDateColumn between firstDate and
secondDate and tbl.kkct is null and tbl.myNumberColumn = myCode ;
return (rtr);
END FUNC_FAAL;
This function returns 117177 as result.
But if I run same query in the function seperately ;
select count()*
from myschema.my_table tbl
where tbl.myDateColumn between firstDate and secondDate
and tbl.kkct is null and tbl.myNumberColumn = myCode ;
I get different result 11344 (which is the right one).
Table and function are in the same schema.
What can be the problem ?
Thanks.

1. i think ur parameter name and Column names are same Firstdate and seconddate try to choose different name
2. try using Trunc function around your dates
where trunc(tbl.myDateColumn) between trunc(firstDate) and trunc(secondDate)then compare the result....sometimes time elements comes into play.
Baig
[My Oracle Blog|http://baigsorcl.blogspot.com/]

Same Query returning different result (Different execution plan)

Hi all,
To day i have discovered a strange thing: a query that return a different result when using a different execution plan.
The query :
SELECT *
FROM schema.table@database a
WHERE     column1 IN ('3')
       AND column2 = '101'
       AND EXISTS
              (SELECT null
                 FROM schema.table2 c
                WHERE a.column3 = SUBSTR (c.column1, 2, 12));where schema.table@database is a remote table.
when executed with the hint /*+ ordered use_nl(a c) */ these query return no result and its execution plan is :
Rows     Row Source Operation
      0 NESTED LOOPS (cr=31 r=0 w=0 time=4894659 us)
   4323   SORT UNIQUE (cr=31 r=0 w=0 time=50835 us)
   4336    TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2 (cr=31 r=0 w=0 time=7607 us)
      0   REMOTE (cr=0 r=0 w=0 time=130536 us)When i changed the execution plan with the hint /*+ use_hash(c a) */
Rows     Row Source Operation
   3702 HASH JOIN SEMI (cr=35 r=0 w=0 time=497839 us)
22556   REMOTE (cr=0 r=0 w=0 time=401176 us)
   4336   TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2 (cr=35 r=0 w=0 time=7709 us)It seem that when the execution plan have changed the remote query return no result.
It'is a bug or i have missed somthing ?
PS: The two table are no subject to insert or update statement.
Oracle version : 9.2.0.2.0
System version : HP-UX v1
Thanks.

H.Mahmoud wrote:
Oracle version : 9.2.0.2.0
System version : HP-UX v1Hard to say. You're using a very old and deprecated version of the database, and one that was known to contain bugs.
9.2.0.7 was really the lowest version of 9i that was considered to be 'stable', but even so, it's old and lacking in many ways.
Consider upgrading to the latest database version at your earliest opportunity. (or at least apply patches up to the latest 9i version before querying if there is bugs in your really low buggy version)

Different results for same query on different servers

1. database being converted from 7.3.4 to 9.2
2. query is executed on both servers
3. different results!
The tables and data are the same, and indexes are setup on new server. EXPLAIN PLAN was run on both but with (predictably) widely different results.
I know, not much detail here, but has anyone ever ran into anything like this?
Thanks,
Pat

Folks,
Here is the relevant information for this problem. The attributes have been changed for confidentiality. If you need any other information let me know.
Thanks,
Pat
Query:
SELECT
one,two,three,four,a.five,six,seven,
a.eight,a.nine,
to_char(ten,'99999.99'),to_char(eleven,'99999.99'),
to_char(twelve,'99999.99'),to_char(thirteen,'99999.99'),
fourteen,fifteen,sixteen,seventeen,eighteen,
nineteen,twenty,twentyone
FROM
table1 a,
table2 b
WHERE
a.five = b.five
AND one = 'X'
AND six = ' '
AND three != 12345
AND three IN
(SELECT DISTINCT
three
FROM table3
WHERE
one = 'X'
AND twentytwo = 'XYZ'
AND twentythree != 0
AND twentyfour != 0
AND twentyfive = 'Y'
AND (a.five IN
(SELECT DISTINCT
five
FROM table1
WHERE
one = 'X'
AND three IN (12345)
Table1:
one          varchar2(1)     not null     PK
two          varchar2(20)     not null     PK
three          number(5)     not null     PK
four          number(2)     not null     PK
five          number(6)     not null     PK
six          varchar2(4)     not null     PK
seven          number(4)     not null
eight          varchar2(8)     not null
nine          date          not null
ten          number(7,2)
eleven     number(7,2)
twelve     number(7,2)
thirteen     number(7,2)
Table2:
five          number(6)     not null     PK
fourteen     varchar2(5)     not null
fifteen     varchar2(5)     not null
sixteen     varchar2(2)     not null
seventeen     varchar2(35)     not null
eighteen     varchar2(4)     not null
nineteen     varchar2(2)
twenty     varchar2(1)
twentyone     number(6)
Table3:
one          varchar2(1)     not null     PK
twentytwo     varchar2(12)     not null     PK
two          varchar2(20)     not null     PK
three          number(5)     not null     PK
four          number(2)     not null     PK
twentysix     number(2)     not null     PK
twentyfive     varchar2(1)     not null
nine          date          not null
twentythree     number(13,8)     not null
twentyfour     number(12,8)     not null
twentyseven     varchar2(1)     not null
eight          varchar2(8)     not null
Explain - Oracle9i (default, with CBO):
SELECT STATEMENT
RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_3_0
RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_3_1
TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION
HASH JOIN
HASH JOIN
HASH JOIN
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_AB874A
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS
BITMAP AND
BITMAP MERGE
BITMAP KEY ITERATION
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_AB874A
BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
BITMAP MERGE
BITMAP KEY ITERATION
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6602_AB874A
BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX04
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6602_AB874A
TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2
Query results - Oracle9i (with CBO):
X|A | 1| 0| 22| | 1|08-MAR-02|XYZ | | 24.00| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|B | 2| 1| 22| | 7|04-DEC-01|XYZ | | 3.25| 8.00| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|C | 3| 1| 22| | 1|14-AUG-02|XYZ | | 10.35| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|D | 4| 1| 22| | 6|11-JUL-02|XYZ | | .00| 13.90| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
(approximately 4550 rows returned)
Explain - Oracle9i (ALTER SESSION SET OPTIMIZER_METHOD=RULE;):
SELECT STATEMENT
MERGE JOIN
SORT JOIN
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW VW_NSO_1
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE3
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE3INDEXPK
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN TABLE2INDEXPK
SORT JOIN
VIEW VW_NSO_2
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
Explain - Oracle 7.3.4:
SELECT STATEMENT
MERGE JOIN
SORT JOIN
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE3
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE3INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN TABLE2INDEXPK
SORT JOIN
VIEW
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
Query results - Oracle 7.3.4:
X|A | 1| 0| 22| | 1|08-MAR-02|XYZ | | 24.00| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|B | 2| 1| 22| | 7|04-DEC-01|XYZ | | 3.25| 8.00| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|C | 3| 1| 22| | 1|14-AUG-02|XYZ | | 10.35| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|D | 4| 1| 22| | 6|11-JUL-02|XYZ | | .00| 13.90| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
(approximately 1150 rows returned)
Indexes (used):
TABLE1INDEX03     (three)
TABLE1INDEX04     (five)
TABLE2INDEXPK     (five)
TABLE3INDEXPK     (one,twentytwo,two,three,four,twentysix)
Discussion:
Notice the repeating result for X,E,5,5,23,.... in the Oracle9i retrieval using CBO.
The execution of this query returned approximately four times the number of rows as
Oracle 7.3.4 using RBO. This is a function of how many "fours" there are in table3
that have matching "threes and fours" in table1. If you put a DISTINCT clause at the
very front of the query (SELECT DISTINCT one,two,three ....) then the result is
accurate and the same as Oracle 7.3.4. In one execution of this query, 27,000 rows
are expected to be returned, but the server returned over 1 million rows!
When RBO was used on Oracle9i, the results were identical to the ones on Oracle 7.3.4.

InfoSet - returns no result after transport

I realize I will not receive an answer to solve me problem, but hope someone can point me to how to determine my problem.
I have an InfoSet in our BI dev system that works fine. Previously, it was transported to our BI qas system and also worked fine. There was a data purge and reload, and since then it stopped retrieving data. There may have been a patch placed on the system, and changes to the InfoSet in dev which required adjusting the InfoSet.
What I have is the BI InfoSet working in dev, but not in qas. I have also created a duplicate of this InfoSet, and it returns no results. I have confirmed both my InfoProviders have reportable data, and the InoProviders have matching 0materials (which is the linked between them).
I'm open to any thoughts on what to check. I've ran RSISET in dev, recollected the InfoSet and transported it. The InfoSet still fails. It's puzzling why it works in dev but not qas.
Again, I'm open to any thoughts, however remote they might be.

If your QA is open, then try to deactivate and re-activate the InfoSet.

"select count(*)" and "select single *" returns different result

Good day!
product version SAP ECC 6.0
oracle10
data transfers from external oracle db into customer tables using direct oracle db link
sometimes I get case with different results from 2 statements
*mytable has 10 rows
*1st statement
data: cnt type I value 0.
select count( * ) into cnt from mytable WHERE myfield_0 = 123 and myfield_1 = '123'.
*cnt returns 10 - correct
*2nd statement
select single * from mytable WHERE myfield_0 = 123 and myfield_1 = '123'.
*sy-dbcnt returns 0
*sy-subrc returns 4 - incorrect, 10 rows are "invisible"
but
1. se16 shows correct row number
2. I update just one row from "invisible" rows using se16 and 2nd statement returns correct result after that
can not understand why
thank you in advance.

Thank you, Vishal
but,
general problem is that
1. both statements have the same WHERE conditions
2. 1st return resultset with data (sy-dbcnt=10), 2nd return empty dataset, but must return 1 in sy-dbcnt
Yes, different meaning, you are right, but must 2nd must return 1, because of "select single *" construction, not 0.
Dataset to process is the same, WHERE conditions are equal...
I think the problem is that how ABAP interperets select count(*) and "select single *".
Maybe "select count (*)" scans only PK from index page(s)? and "select single *" scans data pages? and something is wrong with that?
I'm new in SAP and didn't find any SAP tool to trace dump of data and indexes pages with Native SQL.
se16 shows all records.
And why after simple manual update of just one record using se16 "select single *" returns 1?
I've just marked one row to update, didn't change any data, then pressed "save".

Two different results using one query

Hi Friends
Oracle version that I am using is : Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
I have a scenario where one account can be related to two customers. Hence, in table have many rows for one account. Here’s the sample data:
Account_ID | product_code | cust_id | relationship_code | entity_code
1111 | ABC | 1234 | SOL | CUST
1111 | ABC | 2222 | ZZZ | LINK
1111 | ABC | 4455 | ABC | LINK
2222 | ABC | 7890 | SOL | CUST
2222 | ABC | 5678 | ZZZ | LINK
3333 | JFK | 5878 | TST | CUST
3333 | JFK | 3254 | PRI | CUST
3333 | JFK | 3299 | PRI | CUST
4444 | JFK | 2535 | SOL | CUST
4444 | JFK | 4565 | SOL | CUST
5555 | DEF | 6666 | PRI | CUST
5555 | DEF | 6667 | TST | CUST
5555 | DEF | 9667 | TST | CUSTIn this scenario, I need two outputs differently:
Output 1: When an account has relationship_code = ‘SOL’ then take the least cust_id
1111 | ABC | 1234 | SOL | CUST
2222 | ABC | 5678 | ZZZ | LINK
4444 | JFK | 2535 | SOL | CUST Output 2: else take the highest cust_id
3333 | JFK | 5878 | TST | CUST
5555 | DEF | 9667 | TST | CUSTHow can I get this result using one query?

Not sure what you mean. Works OK:
SQL> with t as (
2             select 1111 account_ID,'ABC' product_code,1234 cust_id,'SOL' relationship_code,'CUST' entity_code from dual union all
3             select 1111,'ABC',2222,'ZZZ','LINK' from dual union all
4             select 1111,'ABC',4455,'ABC','LINK' from dual union all
5             select 2222,'ABC',7890,'SOL','CUST' from dual union all
6             select 2222,'ABC',5678,'ZZZ','LINK' from dual union all
7             select 3333,'JFK',5878,'TST','CUST' from dual union all
8             select 3333,'JFK',3254,'PRI','CUST' from dual union all
9             select 3333,'JFK',3299,'PRI','CUST' from dual union all
10             select 4444,'JFK',2535,'SOL','CUST' from dual union all
11             select 4444,'JFK',4565,'SOL','CUST' from dual union all
12             select 5555,'DEF',6666,'PRI','CUST' from dual union all
13             select 5555,'DEF',6667,'TST','CUST' from dual union all
14             select 5555,'DEF',9667,'TST','CUST' from dual union all
15             select 6666,'XYZ',8877,'SOL','CUST' from dual
16            )
17 select account_ID,
18          product_code,
19          cust_id,
20          relationship_code,
21          entity_code
22    from (
23           select account_ID,
24                   product_code,
25                   cust_id,
26                   relationship_code,
27                   entity_code,
28                   case max(case relationship_code when 'SOL' then 1 else 0 end) over(partition by account_ID)
29                     when 1 then dense_rank() over(partition by account_ID order by cust_id)
30                     else dense_rank() over(partition by account_ID order by cust_id desc)
31                   end rnk
32             from t
33          )
34    where rnk = 1
35 /
ACCOUNT_ID PRO    CUST_ID REL ENTI
      1111 ABC       1234 SOL CUST
      2222 ABC       5678 ZZZ LINK
      3333 JFK       5878 TST CUST
      4444 JFK       2535 SOL CUST
      5555 DEF       9667 TST CUST
      6666 XYZ       8877 SOL CUST
6 rows selected.
SQL> SY.

JNDI returns different results local vs. remote?

I cannot get the Sun Application Server 8.1 to provide access to EJBs from an independant Tomcat. The server does seem to provide access to the EJB remote interfaces when the client war file is deployed within the SAS-internal web container. In trying to debug this problem, I have noticed that JNDI returns different objects in the two cases, even though the client in both cases is making a "remote" call to IIOP port 3700 to get the JNDI info!
When run within the SunAppServer internal web container, JNDI returns objects of type:
<package name>._<BeanName>RemoteHome_DynamicStub
(e.g. in my case com.aa.ejb._BusinessRemoteHome_DynamicStub for a bean named "Business")
However, when the same .war is deployed on an independant Tomcat running on the same machine, JNDI returns objects of type:
com.sun.corba.se.impl.corba.CORBAObjectImpl
Is this normal? Is there some way that I should be getting the DynamicStubs delivered to the remote clients?
I wouldn't be worried about this except that the PortableRemoteObject.narrow() method returns null when I try to use it on the CORBAObjectImpl references.
The relevant parts of my code are:
p.put( Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,"com.sun.jndi.cosnaming.CNCtxFactory" );
p.put( Context.PROVIDER_URL, "iiop://localhost:3700" );
//?? Note: this works the same whether I use "localhost" or my actual IP address.
String objName = "ejb/Business";
InitialContext initial = new InitialContext(p);
out.println("<P>Looking up objName="+objName);
Object objref = initial.lookup(objName);
out.println("<P>objref="+objref);
out.println("<br>objref class="+objref.getClass().getName());
//?? When run in the SAS-internal web container, this displays:
//?? com.aa.ejb._BusinessRemoteHome_DynamicStub
//?? When run in a separate Tomcat, this displays:
//?? com.sun.corba.se.impl.corba.CORBAObjectImpl
BusinessRemoteHome home =
(BusinessRemoteHome)PortableRemoteObject.narrow(objref,
BusinessRemoteHome.class);
//?? When run in the SAS-internal web container, this works correctly.
//?? When run in a separate Tomcat, this returns null!

Okay - a good night's sleep helped. Found the solution:
Properties props = new Properties();
props.setProperty(Context.PROVIDER_URL, "iiop://localhost:3700");
props.setProperty(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "com.sun.appserv.naming.S1ASCtxFactory");
Context ctx = new InitialContext(props);
Object ref = ctx.lookup("ejb/someEJB");
etc.Hope this helps.
Cheers
Keith

Wrong number of members in a TG. Infoset query vs Segment Builder.

Hi gurus,
I've discovered an issue in our CRM System (BBPCRM 600) and I have no idea of how to solve.
For our marketing segmentation, we've created a Infoset (SQ02) with a link between standard (BUT000, CRMD_ORDERADM_H, CRMD_OPPORT_H) and custom tables. Over this infoset, I've created an infoset query (SQ01).
During our test, we've noticed the following: Using the same filters in segment builder and in infoset query, results are not the same!! Segment builder adds more partners to our TG's and even these partner doesn´t met the filters!
For Example:
Using POSTING DATE from CRMD_ORDERADM_H as filter: From 01/01/2014 to 01/312014.
Using infoset query, all partners I'm getting are correct, all of them have CRM operations for this date interval.
However, using this same filter in segment builder, the resulting list of partners has one more than query list...and this partner doesn´t have any operation for the chosen internval.
How is this possible? Why results are not the same? Any ideas? Is there any BADI for segment builder that must be checked?
A lot of thanks!!
Message was edited by: SAP _ES

Solved!!
I was wrongly using AND/OR options to add filters in the segmentation tool...ups!

BW Query on Segment Builder

Hi gurus,
I am working with a bw query in the segment builder. My query has customer and country as a characteristics and some key figures as a results. My problem is that I want to filter in the segment builder by the country and I am not able to do this and I don't know if there is some special way to build the query or if I have to filter as a datasource.
The query schema is:
customer country KF1 KF2 KF3.
I haven't problems to filter by the key figures but I am not able to filter by country.
Thanks in advace.

Hi Alec,
I can suggest that you prepare a attribute list that has datasources from BW query (use your required key figures) and also create a infoset based on the business partner master data (this will have the country).
Now you use these two data sources in your attribute list and create filters.
See if this works as iam suggesting as per my understanding of your posting.
thanks
Srini

Same query returning different result set

hi all,
i am using db 10g.
i have a query like below
SELECT SUM(EID_AMOUNT)amt,EID_INCR_CODE,EIH_EFF_DATE
     FROM EMP_INC_HEADER,EMP_INC_DETAILS
    WHERE EIH_EMP_CODE = EID_EMP_CODE
      AND EIH_EFF_DATE = EIH_EFF_DATE
      AND EIH_STATUS   = 'P'
      AND EID_EMP_CODE = '003848'
GROUP BY EID_INCR_CODE,EIH_EFF_DATE
ORDER BY EID_INCR_CODE,EIH_EFF_DATE;which is leading to the output
      AMT EID_INCR_CODE   EIH_EFF_D
     2000 BASIC           21-SEP-10
     2000 BASIC           23-SEP-10
     2000 BASIC           15-OCT-10
     2000 BASIC           21-OCT-10
     1200 HTRAN           21-SEP-10
     1200 HTRAN           23-SEP-10
     1200 HTRAN           15-OCT-10
     1200 HTRAN           21-OCT-10
      800 OTHERS          21-SEP-10
      800 OTHERS          23-SEP-10
      800 OTHERS          15-OCT-10
      800 OTHERS          21-OCT-10i have query
SELECT SUM(EID_AMOUNT)amt,EID_INCR_CODE,EID_EFF_DATE
FROM EMP_INC_HEADER,EMP_INC_DETAILS
WHERE EIH_EMP_CODE = EID_EMP_CODE
AND EIH_EFF_DATE = EID_EFF_DATE
AND EIH_STATUS = 'P'
AND EID_EMP_CODE = '003848'
GROUP BY EID_INCR_CODE,EID_EFF_DATE
ORDER BY EID_INCR_CODE,EID_EFF_DATE;
leading to
      AMT EID_INCR_CODE   EID_EFF_D
      500 BASIC           21-SEP-10
      500 BASIC           23-SEP-10
      500 BASIC           15-OCT-10
      500 BASIC           21-OCT-10
      300 HTRAN           21-SEP-10
      300 HTRAN           23-SEP-10
      300 HTRAN           15-OCT-10
      300 HTRAN           21-OCT-10
      200 OTHERS          21-SEP-10
      200 OTHERS          23-SEP-10
      200 OTHERS          15-OCT-10
      200 OTHERS          21-OCT-10
12 rows selected.what second query is returning is correct. as per the table.
but my question what is the difference between my first and second query.
in what way it is different(i am not getting any idea).
if any one is having any clue please share with me.
Thanks..

what is the difference between my first and second queryLook like there's no difference.
I think you really meant something like
SELECT SUM(EID_AMOUNT) amt,EID_INCR_CODE,EIH_EFF_DATE
FROM EMP_INC_HEADER EIH,
       EMP_INC_DETAILS EID
WHERE EIH.EMP_CODE = EID.EMP_CODE
   AND EIH.EFF_DATE = EIH.EFF_DATE
   AND EIH.STATUS   = 'P'
   AND EID.EMP_CODE = '003848'
GROUP BY EID.INCR_CODE,EIH.EFF_DATE
ORDER BY EID.INCR_CODE,EIH.EFF_DATERegards
Etbin

SQ02 Infoset returns different results in SQ01 Query vs. Segment Builder TG

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for