SQL Performance Issues after migrating to 10.2.0.3 from 9i

Hi,
We recently migrated our database from 9i (9.2.0.8) to 10.2.0.3 (Test Environment), we have Windows 32 bit server on RAC+ASM, we have noticed several of our SQL which ran prettry efficiently in 9i are just taking hours to complete. I opened a SR with Oracle support and it is still WIP, but I would like to ask if anyone has similar kind of experience and what they did to resolve it ? Any feedback is appreciated.
Regards
Mansoor

The first thing to do would be to take a SQL Trace of the same SQL from both 9i and 10g installations and compare the results. That should give you the clue as to where to look for.
Also, it is always recommended to gather the statistics after an upgrade in major version. I hope it is done already.

Similar Messages

Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

Hi All,
There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
Select query is on the table COSP.
SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
        FROM COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
        WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
          AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
          AND LEDNR EQ '00'
          AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
          AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
          AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
          AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
          AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
        GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
   LOOP AT I_COSP      .
     COSP                           = I_COSP      .
     PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
     CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
     CLEAR CCR1S                         .
   ENDLOOP.
ENDSELECT.
I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
Thanks in advance for the responses.
Regards,
Dedeepya.

Hi,
ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
Some generic comments:
1. never use SELECT
                   endselect.
   SELECT
into table
   for all entries in table
where.
   use perform statment after this selection.
2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
    e.g in your case
          sequence should be
LEDNR
OBJNR
GJAHR
WRTTP
VERSN
KSTAR
HRKFT
VRGNG
VBUND
PARGB
BEKNZ
TWAER
PERBL
sequence should be same as defined in table.
Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Pranaya

SQL Performance issue: Using user defined function with group by

Hi Everyone,
im new here and I really could need some help on a weird performance issue. I hope this is the right topic for SQL performance issues.
Well ok, i create a function for converting a date from timezone GMT to a specified timzeone.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION I3S_REP_1.fnc_user_rep_date_to_local (date_in IN date, tz_name_in IN VARCHAR2) RETURN date
IS
tz_name VARCHAR2(100);
date_out date;
BEGIN
SELECT
to_date(to_char(cast(from_tz(cast( date_in AS TIMESTAMP),'GMT')AT
TIME ZONE (tz_name_in) AS DATE),'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss'),'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
INTO date_out
FROM dual;
RETURN date_out;
END fnc_user_rep_date_to_local;The following statement is just an example, the real statement is much more complex. So I select some date values from a table and aggregate a little.
select
stp_end_stamp,
count(*) noi
from step
where
stp_end_stamp
BETWEEN
to_date('23-05-2009 00:00:00','dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
AND
to_date('23-07-2009 00:00:00','dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
group by
stp_end_stampThis statement selects ~70000 rows and needs ~ 70ms
If i use the function it selects the same number of rows ;-) and takes ~ 4 sec ...
select
fnc_user_rep_date_to_local(stp_end_stamp,'Europe/Berlin'),
count(*) noi
from step
where
stp_end_stamp
BETWEEN
to_date('23-05-2009 00:00:00','dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
AND
to_date('23-07-2009 00:00:00','dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
group by
fnc_user_rep_date_to_local(stp_end_stamp,'Europe/Berlin')I understand that the DB has to execute the function for each row.
But if I execute the following statement, it takes only ~90ms ...
select
fnc_user_rep_date_to_gmt(stp_end_stamp,'Europe/Berlin','ny21654'),
noi
from
select
stp_end_stamp,
count(*) noi
from step
where
stp_end_stamp
BETWEEN
to_date('23-05-2009 00:00:00','dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
AND
to_date('23-07-2009 00:00:00','dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
group by
stp_end_stamp
)The execution plan for all three statements is EXACTLY the same!!!
Usually i would say, that I use the third statement and the world is in order. BUT I'm working on a BI project with a tool called Business Objects and it generates SQL, so my hands are bound and I can't make this tool to generate the SQL as a subselect.
My questions are:
Why is the second statement sooo much slower than the third?
and
Howcan I force the optimizer to do whatever he is doing to make the third statement so fast?
I would really appreciate some help on this really weird issue.
Thanks in advance,
Andi

Hi,
The execution plan for all three statements is EXACTLY the same!!!Not exactly. Plans are the same - true. They uses slightly different approach to call function. See:
drop table t cascade constraints purge;
create table t as select mod(rownum,10) id, cast('x' as char(500)) pad from dual connect by level <= 10000;
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't');
create or replace function test_fnc(p_int number) return number is
begin
    return trunc(p_int);
end;
explain plan for select id from t group by id;
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display(null,null,'advanced'));
explain plan for select test_fnc(id) from t group by test_fnc(id);
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display(null,null,'advanced'));
explain plan for select test_fnc(id) from (select id from t group by id);
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display(null,null,'advanced'));Output:
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 47235625
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |    10 |    30 |   162   (3)| 00:00:02 |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY     |      |    10 |    30 |   162   (3)| 00:00:02 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 10000 | 30000 |   159   (1)| 00:00:02 |
Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id):
   1 - SEL$1
   2 - SEL$1 / T@SEL$1
Outline Data
/*+
      BEGIN_OUTLINE_DATA
      FULL(@"SEL$1" "T"@"SEL$1")
      OUTLINE_LEAF(@"SEL$1")
      ALL_ROWS
      OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE('10.2.0.4')
      IGNORE_OPTIM_EMBEDDED_HINTS
      END_OUTLINE_DATA
Column Projection Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - (#keys=1) "ID"[NUMBER,22]
   2 - "ID"[NUMBER,22]
34 rows selected.
SQL>
Explained.
SQL>
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 47235625
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |    10 |    30 |   162   (3)| 00:00:02 |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY     |      |    10 |    30 |   162   (3)| 00:00:02 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 10000 | 30000 |   159   (1)| 00:00:02 |
Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id):
   1 - SEL$1
   2 - SEL$1 / T@SEL$1
Outline Data
/*+
      BEGIN_OUTLINE_DATA
      FULL(@"SEL$1" "T"@"SEL$1")
      OUTLINE_LEAF(@"SEL$1")
      ALL_ROWS
      OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE('10.2.0.4')
      IGNORE_OPTIM_EMBEDDED_HINTS
      END_OUTLINE_DATA
Column Projection Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - (#keys=1) "TEST_FNC"("ID")[22]
   2 - "ID"[NUMBER,22]
34 rows selected.
SQL>
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display(null,null,'advanced'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 47235625
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |    10 |    30 |   162   (3)| 00:00:02 |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY     |      |    10 |    30 |   162   (3)| 00:00:02 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 10000 | 30000 |   159   (1)| 00:00:02 |
Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id):
   1 - SEL$F5BB74E1
   2 - SEL$F5BB74E1 / T@SEL$2
Outline Data
/*+
      BEGIN_OUTLINE_DATA
      FULL(@"SEL$F5BB74E1" "T"@"SEL$2")
      OUTLINE(@"SEL$2")
      OUTLINE(@"SEL$1")
      MERGE(@"SEL$2")
      OUTLINE_LEAF(@"SEL$F5BB74E1")
      ALL_ROWS
      OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE('10.2.0.4')
      IGNORE_OPTIM_EMBEDDED_HINTS
      END_OUTLINE_DATA
Column Projection Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - (#keys=1) "ID"[NUMBER,22]
   2 - "ID"[NUMBER,22]
37 rows selected.

Performance Issues after an Upgrade

Hello!
We are experiencing performance issues after we upgraded to a new version of Hyperion (11.1.2.1). At this point, I am not too sure about the actual causes for this degrade in performance but I am trying to narrow down the causes and need your inputs. Please help me with your ideas.
1) What could be the causes/factors for the performance to degrade after an upgrade?
2) Does the performance of a script depend on the user credentials i.e. who is launching the script? Whether it’s the super admin of the application/application owner or an application specific admin?
3) Does the performance of the scripts depend on the place you are launching it from? For example - will the performance differ if it’s launched from MaxL Vs EAS?
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Thanks,
- Krrish

There are a number of bugs 12600557, 12675485, 12669814, 12698488 logged in for 11.1.2.1 - If you use Internet Explorer 8 and have data forms designed to use a large number of sparse dimension members in rows or columns, you may experience performance degradation when opening the data forms.
This has been fixed in Oracle Hyperion Planning, Fusion Edition Release 11.1.2.1 Patch Set Update (PSU): 11.1.2.1.101 which is available on My Oracle Support as Patch 12666861.
HTH-
Jasmine.

Performance issues after upgrading to 11g

hello,
We are facing a performance issue after upgrading from 10g to 11g.
as you can see, the tables named APPLSYS.FND_ENV_CONTEXT has grown to 15544880 records,
and oracle is using TABLE ACCESS FULL on it:
DELETE FND_ENV_CONTEXT E
WHERE NOT EXISTS
(SELECT 'X'
FROM FND_CONCURRENT_PROCESSES P
WHERE P.CONCURRENT_PROCESS_ID = E.CONCURRENT_PROCESS_ID)
AND ROWNUM < 10000;
Plan:
DELETE STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 74,345
     5 DELETE APPLSYS.FND_ENV_CONTEXT
          4 COUNT STOPKEY
               3 HASH JOIN RIGHT ANTI Cost: 74,345 Bytes: 3,108,980 Cardinality: 155,449
                    1 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) APPLSYS.FND_CONCURRENT_PROCESSES_U1 Cost: 166 Bytes: 315,450 Cardinality: 63,090
                    2 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE APPLSYS.FND_ENV_CONTEXT Cost: 69,124 Bytes: 233,173,200 Cardinality: 15,544,880
select num_rows,last_analyzed from dba_tables where table_name='FND_ENV_CONTEXT'
15544880 07/07/2011 12:08:55
please advice.
Ofer

Please see these docs.
Table Fnd_env_context Growing Very Fast [ID 419990.1]
FND Related Tablespaces Growing at Rapid and Excessive Rate [ID 189800.1]
FNDCPPUR Request Does Not Always Delete Files From The File System, Many Files Will Be Denoted As "deletion failed" [ID 1335304.1]
Concurrent Processing - Best Practices for Performance for Concurrent Managers in E-Business Suite [ID 1057802.1]
Concurrent Processing - Purge Concurrent Request and/or Manager Data Program (FNDCPPUR) [ID 104282.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Performance issue after DB copy

Hello,
I am facing performance issue after doing database copy. Let me explain entire story.
Enviornment is Oracle 10g (10.2.0.4), Operating System is Solaries.
We have one production system with DB sid (PR1) and i have to builded new system using PR1 as PR2, we have done full offline copy from one hardware to another hardware (Hardware is same on PR1 and PR2) and perform rsync command at os level to sync all oracle files at OS level(PR2 is not build using backup/restore or export import method).
Now problem is that
One of query if i am running on PR1 system it is taking only 10-15 seconds, while if i am running same query on PR2 it is taking nearly about 55-60 mins. In initial search i found SGA is very diffrent from PR1 to PR2 then i did change the SGA parameter like PR1 in PR2 after doing changes i am running same query it is taking 6-7 mins, so i got some benifit here, but still i need to tune the query. Query contains 3 tables and all tables having atleast 3-4 indexes.
Can some one help what to tune and what to check?
Thanks,
Singh

Check the explain plan on both systems to see if both instances are trying to do the same thing. This will tell you a lot about what is going on based on physical or logical reads and how long they are taking. You should have the same statistics on both databases if you did a physical copy, but check that too just to make sure. If stats and explain plan are the same, check your hardware. Do you have the same amount of RAM on both systems? Are you using similar storage? If the plan is showing that you are doing a considerable amount of physical I/Os on both it could just be that your physical disk is slower on server two.

I have a collection of thousands of ebooks mostly in epub & some in PDF formats. After migrating to Maverick all books disappered from my Ipad. Please help.

I have a collection of thousands of ebooks mostly in epub & a few in PDF formats. After migrating to Maverick all books disappered from my Ipad. Please help. In itunes library book option has vanished. What do I do?

Hi Akshay,
If you want your images to appear standalone with no other page item on the page, then you can insert Page break on an image.
This is how you can specify a page break:
1. Select the image
2. Goto Object->Object Export Options
3. Select EPUB and HTML tab
4. Select Custom Layout check box and then check Insert Page break. You can select from the option in the dropdown-Before Image, After Image, Before and After Image as per your requirement.
Regarding your question about images:
You export your graphs as JPEG but are those JPEGs of good resolution? If they are, then InDesign is doing something wrong during export but if the JPEGs are not of good quality then it is not an export issue. Please provide some more details here.
Regards,
Pooja

After migrating a new Mac Book Pro from Time Capsule, I noticed that I lost a group of Favorites on the older iMac. The puzzling thing is that the Favorites are on my iPhone--not the old iMac or the new Mac Book Pro. How do I get the Favorites back?

After migrating a new Mac Book Pro from Time Capsule, I noticed that I lost a group of Favorites on the older iMac. The puzzling thing is that the Favorites are on my iPhone--not the old iMac or the new Mac Book Pro. How do I get the Favorites back?

If you are syncing using iCloud, try going to System Preferences/iCloud (computers) and checking Safari. If it is checked, try deselecting it, wait 10-15 seconds, and then check it again.

After migrating to a new MacBook Air from an older MacBook, iPhoto gets stuck on uploading cache, it just "spins" forever. I downloaded a new iPhoto app and replaced it but when opened it just does the same thing? What is going on?

After migrating to a new MacBook Air from an older MacBook, iPhoto gets stuck on "uploading cache", it just "spins" forever. I downloaded a new iPhoto app and replaced it, but when opened it just does the same thing? What is going on? Where are my photos now? How can I upload photos from my camera without iPhoto?
Is there a better app?
Thanks, Chris

Take the system to an Apple store to be fixed or replaced as the one you have has defective hardware.

Replication Configuration issue after migrating from SQL Server 2005 to SQL Server 2008 R2

Hi All,
This weekend we have migrated one of our Core system from SQL Server 2005 SP3 to SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2. Migration went successful. However when we are trying to Configure transaction replication we are getting below Error:
Msg 21854, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_MSrepl_addarticle, Line 573
Could not add new article to publication 'abc' because of active schema change activities or a snapshot is being generated.
Background:
Database compability Changed from 90 to 100.
A quick Help would be appreciated.
Best Regards - Viral
Thanks - Viral

Is a snapshot being generated? the message seems to indicate one is.
looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Administration?
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Server-2008-Management-Administration/dp/067233044X looking for a book on SQL Server 2008 Full-Text Search?
http://www.amazon.com/Pro-Full-Text-Search-Server-2008/dp/1430215941

Issues after migrating from 3.0.6.6.5 to 3.0.9.8.3A

G'day All,
Over the last week or so I have performed some test migrations using copies
of our production Portal environment and here are some of the issues that I have encountered.
ISSUE 1 - Performance
Using a stopwatch (primitive, I know) I visited a few parts of our Portal and recorded timings
Performance did not improve dramatically. In fact, after the 3.0.9.8.3A patch, some things slowed right down.
I tested using a Sun Ultra 80 (2 x 450MHz CPUs) our Development host.
(I also tested using a spare Ultra 10 (1 x 333MHz) This was MUCH slower than the numbers seen below)
In all the timings below, I did the following:
1.Logged on as PORTAL30 this takes me to the Portal Home page showing the Build tab
2. Clicked on the Navigator icon
3. From the Navigator Pages section, I clicked on our company homepage
4. From the Main tab on the company homepage, I clicked on our Customer Service tab (one of many that we have)
5. Click on the Ops & Security tab (another one of ours)
6. Click on Logout
Timings are in SECONDS. I ran thru the process at least 3 times and recorded
the final 2 timings to allow for the first time thru populating caches etc.
Pre migration - Portal 3.0.6.6.5 iAS 1.0.2.0.1
Log in          4     3
Navigator     3     3
Homepage     3     3
First tab     4     3
Second tab     3     3
Logout          1     1
Post iAS migration - Portal 3.0.6.6.5 iAS 1.0.2.2.0
Log in          4     3
Navigator     3     3
Homepage     3     3
First tab     4     4
Second tab     3     4
Logout          1     1
** No significant difference
Post Portal migration - Portal 3.0.9.8.2 iAS 1.0.2.2.0
Log in          3     3
Navigator     3     3
Homepage     3     4
First tab     4     4
Second tab     3     3
Logout          1     1
** No significant difference
Post iAS Patch 1866039 Required by Portal 3.0.9.8.3A
Log in          3     3
Navigator     3     3
Homepage     4     4
First tab     4     4
Second tab     3     3
Logout          1     1
** No significant difference
Post Portal migration - Portal 3.0.9.8.3A iAS 1.0.2.2.0
Log in          3     3
Navigator     19     19 !!!!!!!!
Homepage     20     21 !!!!!!!!
First tab     3     3
Second tab     3     3
Logout          1     1
** Bringing up Navigator and the first page from Navigator now takes ages.
Analysing PORTAL30 objects using wwsbr_stats.gather_stats made no difference
to the above timings.
Anyone have any ideas about this???
Bear in mind that this slow down probably only affects me as the
developer since end users pretty much stick to the tabs on the homepage
and never need to use Navigator.
And end user login and presentation of the company homepages takes about 4 seconds.
ISSUE 2 - Fonts
During the migration, many of our developed forms/reports now contain headings/labels that
are so small as to be unreadable (eg 1 point in size)
This seems to be due to the fact that originally the fonts were sized as (-3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3)
relative sizing. This has been screwed up during migration and has ended up as fonts
being sized 1, 2, 3 points in size.
I will have to visit each form and report and set sizes accordingly.
The PEOPLE_APP application supplied by Oracle also suffers from this problem and is a little harder
to fix. (Check Metalink)
ISSUE 3 - Menu permissions
I have a couple of menus that are only viewable by certain groups.
This permission disappeared along the way leaving the menu NOT visible to anyone.
I will have to visited each menu and set permissions once again.
I hope this list may help others embarking on the same migration path.
I would highly recommend copying your production environment and practising on the copy first.
Regards,
Tony Cook
eSign Australia
[email protected]

Further to the performance problem above, I found the following bug on Metalink:
Bug Number: 2391402
PERFOMANCE DEGRADATION WITH 3.0.9.8.3 ON IE
Funnily enough, this bug was meant to be addressed by the 3.0.9.8.3A patch that I had already applied.
After reading the bug report I added the following line to httpd.conf
BrowserMatch "MSIE" nokeepalive downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
I am now seeing the following timings
Log in          3     3
Navigator     3     3 !!!!!!!!
Homepage     3     3 !!!!!!!!
First tab     3     3
Second tab     3     3
Logout          1     1
There is a 15 second timeout that was adding to the response times I was seeing prior
to making the change to the httpd.conf file eg. 19 seconds down to 3ish
Regards,
Tony Cook
eSign Australia
[email protected]

Performance Issue After Moving To 11g From 9i

We have a process that inserts approximately 275,000 records into a table containing 22,000,000+ records. This process consistently runs in 1 hour and 20 minutes in our Oracle 9i Database (Standard Edition). This same process runs in 8+ hours in our Oracle 11g Database (Standard Edition) which is a copy of the Oracle 9i Database.
Both databases run on identical hardware running Windows Server 2000. The Servers each have 2 GB RAM.
We have noticed that the process in 11g slows down significantly after it has been running for about 30 minutes and is continuously consuming memory. We also ran a test in which we dropped all indexes on the table being inserted into except the primary key and the process still ran for 8+ hours again.
We executed another test in which the same process was run however we had it insert into a table that contained 0 records and our performance was better than on the 9i Database.
Any ideas on what might be causing the performance issue?

Welcome to the forums !
Troubleshooting performance issues is difficult when all of the factual data is absent. Pl review these threads to identify information that you need to post in order to help you.
When your query takes too long:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
When your query takes too long ...
HTH
Srini

SharePoint 2007 performance issue after upgrading the operating system

We upgraded the operating system of our SharePoint Server 2007 from 2003 to 2008 R2. After upgrade we rebuilt the SharePoint using content DBs we backed up before upgrade. All settings is same except that we moved the DBs to new SQL servers. Now users are
reporting performance issue with sites. I experienced it myself some of the pages takes 9-30 seconds to load. Also our SharePoint server is single server. I monitored the SharePoint Server and it is fine. I did fiddler trace and here are the result. I see
lots of 401 (login failed) errors then 302 (redirect) then 200 (OK). Do you know why we are getting 401 errors?
Result
Protocol
Host
URL
Body
Caching
Content-Type
Process
184
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
185
302
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA
196
text/html; charset=UTF-8
iexplore:15344
186
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA/default.aspx
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
187
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/bif/EUROPE-AMA/default.aspx
105,487
private, max-age=0; Expires: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:37:48 GMT
text/html; charset=utf-8
iexplore:15344
188
401
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/1033/styles/calendar.css?rev=BrbrIU86qTG2EHx1ZUuFBQ%3D%3D
341
text/html; charset=us-ascii
iexplore:15344
189
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/prevbuttonltr.gif
76
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
190
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/nextbuttonltr.gif
78
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
191
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/day.gif
1,051
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
192
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/month.gif
1,068
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
193
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/1033/styles/calendar.css?rev=BrbrIU86qTG2EHx1ZUuFBQ%3D%3D
28,814
max-age=31536000
text/css
iexplore:15344
194
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/week.gif
1,057
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
195
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/weekbox.gif
149
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
196
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/alldayDefault.gif
157
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
197
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/calnumBttntoday.gif
146
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344
198
200
HTTP
sp07.ourcompany.com
/_layouts/images/calnumBttn.gif
95
max-age=31536000
image/gif
iexplore:15344

Hi
when you request a Site collection (http://domain/) or a Site (http://domain/foo/) of your Publishing Site you get redirected to the http://domain/Pages/<WelcomePage>.aspx. SharePoint 2007 uses the 302 header (location temporarily moved) for
this purpose. Surprisingly even WSS uses the 302 header to redirect a root url to the default.aspx. In comparison ASP.NET uses an internal redirect to render the default page when the root url requested: there is no redirect in this situation.
Check the link which can give more input
http://blog.mastykarz.nl/sharepoint-2007-redirect-solved-using-301-instead-of-302-redirects/
for error 401 you can check this link
http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/97027-no-resources-401-unauthorized/d
and check SharePoint ULS logs and event viewer for any exceptions.
Please mark the Answer and Vote me if you think that it will help you to resolved your issue

Performance issue after PT Upgrade.

Hakan and Team ,
We recently moved from PT 8.48 TO PT8.51.18 on CRM 8.8 Application.
After the upgrade, we tremendously saw big performance issues with PeopleSoft CRM Application. It freezes almost every day and all their work-force (call center representatives) go idle. It significantly impacts their productivity and eventually losing revenue.
can you please suggest few suggestion or DOC that will help us to improve performance on application and DB side.
Deatils :-
SQL SERVER 2005
Windows 2008 R2

Hi,
Performance is always a difficult one to tackle.
It can be at so many levels, DB, Appserver, Webserver, CPU, RAM, Infra, etc.
At OOW2012, David Kurtz gave a great highly detailed presentation on this subject: CON9210 - Performance Tuning for PeopleSoft Administrators
http://www.myexpospace.com/oracle2012/smupload/scloader.cfm?SCID=257daa92-a6e8-411a-9806-2c22e56687d3
See if you can apply some of the keypoints from his presentation.
Regards,
Hakan

Issue after Migration: ID and Content-ID are different in SOAP Payload

Hi Experts,
I am facing a strange issue in the PI landscape after the migration from XI 3.0 to PI 7.1.
The scenario is from R/3 system to TIBCO System (Proxy-to-SOAP). The TIBCO system receives the file in SOAP Format. The message is sent from PI via SOAP adapter to TIBCO System.
There is a attachment coming from the R/3 System along with the main message and the main payload/message has a "attachment-ID" as a field. Earlier what used to happen in XI 3.0 that the "Attachment-ID" used to equal to the "Content-ID" when the SOAP payload was generated at the TIBCO end. Now after migration, in PI 7.1 the "Attachment-ID" and "Content-ID" are different. We have control over the "Attachment-ID" as it is coming from the source payload but we do not have any control over the "Content-ID" as we are not creating it.
Can anyone of you please let me know how the SOAP Payload is created and how the content-ID gets populated in the Header of the SOAP Envelope? Also, can anyone help me to fix this issue? Is it something which needs to be handled by us or the BASIS Team?
Thanks,
Arkesh
Edited by: Arkesh Sharma on Dec 16, 2011 12:53 PM

Hi Ramesh,
Thank You for the very Helpful Answer. Before I proceed and close this thread, I have one more question which comes to my mind:
I create my own SOAP Header if I apply the solution provided by you then will the rest of the details in the SOAP Header payload will change or do I need to customize it for myself? For e.g., there is a field named MessageId in the SOAP Header. If I write a Java Mapping, do I need to manually populate the MessageId field in the SOAP Header of my java code or will it be automatically populated?
My requirement is to change only the content ID of the SOAP Header Payload and the rest of the fields should remain the same as it is. Is it possible with the approach that you mentioned above?
Thanks,
Arkesh

SQL Performance Issues after migrating to 10.2.0.3 from 9i

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for