SSIS none text qualifier results in text file containing "_x003C_none_x003E"

There is a bug in SSIS when exporting data from SQL to a comma delimited text file where you specified no text qualifier.
This bug apparently only occurs when you develop the SSIS on a x64 win7 PC and copy the .dtsx file (windows explorer copy/paste) to network path of a x86 SQL server and schedule the job to run from SQL Agent on the same x86 SQL server.
When the SSIS runs, the text file is written out containing text qualifier = "“_x003C_none_x003E".
If you look at "
_x003C_none_x003E", it actually means <none>. x003C = "<" and x003E = ">".
If you go into the SSIS package, double-click in the connection manager section to open the flat file connection manager editor and try to clear the text qualifier removing the <none>,
the <none> value get added back in.
The only work-around is to NOT open the
flat file connection manager editor, but instead make the change using the property window and clear out any value in the TextQualifier field.
Other similar problems occur when you actually want to put a real value in the text qualifier. For explain if you select the double-quote as the text qualifier and copy to a
x86 server and run, you end up with a text file containing the value "
_x0022" around each field instead of a double quote.
In my mind this is a serious bug, I did some research and other people have been having this same issue.
FYI, the SQL server is currently SQL2008 with SP2. I will try to get it updated to SP3/4 this weekend to see that will help.
FYI2, when I am developing the SSIS using VS2008 and my local test/run is done through visual studio on my Dev PC (x64). Everything works fine this way. I do not have a instance of SQL on my machine so I did not test it running from SQL Agent
on my PC.

Todd,
Sorry to revive an older post, but we are currently running into this problem...again, but this is happening on SQL Server 2008 R2 SSIS servers and the corresponding developer machines.
Everything that I'm finding in forums and blogs pretty much points that this is an issue with build mismatches (i.e. one system not being caught up to the server while others are), but I have yet to find anything that really outlines how to properly rectify
the situation and prevent it from happening going forward.
Currently all but our production server (from a server perspective) are exactly the same version numbers (same CU applied).
I can't really speak to all of the developer boxes, but mine matches all but the production server (production is showing a lower number than the expected 10.50.2500.0).
As shown below, what is really odd is the second entry and last entry. Second entry is showing SP1 as the generic identifier, but yet shows Build 7600.
The bottom one shows RTM in the generic identifier, but yet shows Build 7601 Service Pack 1, and the version number isn't the expected 10.50.2500.0.
SQL Server Version
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (SP1) - 10.50.2500.0 (X64)   Jun 17 2011 00:54:03     Standard Edition (64-bit)
on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1) (Hypervisor)
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (SP1) - 10.50.2500.0 (X64)   Jun 17 2011 00:54:03     Standard Edition (64-bit)
on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7600: ) (Hypervisor)
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (SP1) - 10.50.2500.0 (X64)   Jun 17 2011 00:54:03     Standard Edition (64-bit)
on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1) (Hypervisor)
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 (RTM) - 10.50.1617.0 (X64)   Apr 22 2011 19:23:43     Standard Edition (64-bit)
on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1) (Hypervisor)

Similar Messages

Smart Folders That Omit Files Contained In Particular Folders

I would like to create a smart folder that contains all files that have a filename matching a certain string that are not contained in a list of particular folders e.g. everything that has ".pdf" in the filename that is not contained in folders Downloads or Music.
I do not want to permanently exclude these folders from Spotlight's indexing just omit search results that yield files contained in certain folders.
Is there a way to do this?
Thanks

Folder has not been a criteria available for searching. There is a raw query item for the folder, but it specifically states that it cannot be used in a search.
I'm not aware of a workaround.

SSIS started showing NONE text qualifier as _x003C_none_x003E_

Hi All,
We have SQL cluster, after the active node changed from 1 to 2 over the weekend our SSIS package started to apply this kind of code (_x003C_none_x003E_) instead of meaningfull text qualifiers (in this case is NONE), but there are other cases like _x007C_
for example in the csv files it generates.
No changes in SQL or windows, so changing the node seems to be the only change in the environment.
SQL server version is: 10.50.2500.0 SP1 Standard Edition (64-bit)
After switching back from 2 to 1 the files were back to normal again.
Does anybody know what affects the text qualifier in SSIS and how can we make sure that it works correctly on either node?
Thanks!
SSIS question

Please see this link:
_x003C_none_x003E_ FlatFile Error in SSIS
T-SQL Articles
T-SQL e-book by TechNet Wiki Community
T-SQL blog

SSIS importing comma delimited with double quote text qualifier - Works in VS - SQL Job ignores text qualifier and fails (truncation)

I've created an SSIS package to import a comma delimited file (csv) with double quotes for a text qualifier ("). Some of the fields contain the delimiter inside the qualified text. An example row is:
15,"Doe, John",IS2,Alabama
In SSIS I've specified the text qualifier as ". The sample output in the connection manager looks great. The package runs perfectly from VS and when manually executed on the SSIS server itself. The problem comes when I schedule the package to run via SQL
job. At this point the package ignores the text qualifier, and in doing so pushes half of a field into the next available column. But instead of having too many columns, it concatenates the last 2 columns ignoring the delimiter. For example (pipes are fields):
15|"Doe| John"|IS2,Alabama
So the failure happens when the last half of a field is too large to fit into the next available field. In the case above _John" is 6 characters where the IS2 field is char(3). This would cause a truncation failure, which is the error I receive from the
job history.
To further test this I created a failure flow in my data flow to capture the records failing to be pulled from the source csv. Out of ~5000 records, ~1200 are failing, and every one of the failures has a comma delimiter inside the quoted text with a 'split'
length greater than the next ordinal field. The ones without the comma were inserted as normal and records where the split fit into the next ordinal column where also imported, with the last field being concatenated w/delimiter. Example records when selected
from table:
25|"Allan Percone Trucking"|GI6|California --Imported as intended
36|"Renolds| J."|UI6,Colorado --Field position offset by 1 to right - Last field overloaded
To further ensure this is the problem, I changed the csv file and flat file connection manager to pipe delimited, and sure enough every record makes it in perfectly from the SQL job execution.
I've tried comma delimited on the following set ups. Each set up failed.
SSIS Server 2008 R2 RTM
DB Server 2008 RTM
DB Compat 80
SSIS Server 2008 R2 RTM
DB Server 2008 R2 RTM
DB Compat 80
SSIS Server 2008 R2 RTM
DB Server 2008 RTM
DB Compat 100
SSIS Server 2008 R2 RTM
DB Server 2008 R2 RTM
DB Compat 100
Since a lot of our data comes in via comma delimited flat files, I really need a fix for this. If not I'll have to rebuild all my files when I import them to use pipe delimiters instaed of commas. I'd like to avoid the extra processing overhead if possible.
Also, is this a known bug? If so can someone point me to the posting of said bug?
Edit: I can't ask the vendor to change the format to pipe delimited because it comes from a federal government site.

Just wanted to share my experience of this for anyone else since I wasted a morning on it today.
I encountered the same problem where I could run the package fine on my machine but when I deployed to a server and ran the package via dtexec, the " delimeter was being replaced with _x0022_ and columns all slurped up together and overflowing columns/truncating
data etc.
Since I didn't want to manually hack the DTS XML and can't install updates, the solution I used was to set an expression on the textdelimiter field of the flat file connection with the value "\"" (a double quote). That way, even if the one stored in XML
gets bodged somewhere along the way, it is overridden with the correct value at run time. The package works fine everywhere now.

CSV file with text qualifiers around each field causing error on Import

Hi
I have a csv file which I am trying to import - a one line extract is shown below. It is delimited by semi colon and each field has a text qualifier around it.
XXX Drinks Ltd;"BR01";"1";"001.2008";"2008";"Distribution";"-186";"-186";"-186"
When importing i get the following issue
1) BPC doesn't seem to handle the text qualifier for the fields. For example the "BR01" field above requires me to put a conversion as follows ""BR01"" i.e. I have to double the quotes because BPC adds them
2) Even after the required conversion, BPC does not like the double quotes around the amounts, even though when validating the transform I get no error message, when running the import package I get the following message
Record Count: 1
Accept Count: 1
Reject Count: 0
Skip Count
The number of failing rows exceeds the maximum specified. (Microsoft Data Transformation Services (DTS) Data Pump (8004202c): TransformCopy 'DTSTransformation__9' conversion error: General conversion failure on column pair 1 (source column 'SIGNEDDATA' (DBTYPE_STR), destination column 'SIGNEDDATA' (DBTYPE_NUMERIC)).)
Does this my source file can't have double quotes as a text qualifier?
thanks in advance
Scott Farrington

James, thanks for your reply
does that mean that BPC can't deal with the double quotes? I understand about removing them and using a comma for a delimiter, but this is the file format I have been given.
What I really need to know is, given this format, using a transformation and/or mapping function, can I import the data the way it is?
And I still need an answer to my second point, about the error message received on running the import package,
thanks
Scott

Problem with non iPhone users receiving my text sent pictures. Can I make them smaller files?

Problem with non iPhone users receiving my text sent pictures. Can I make them smaller files? I know that is possible for email sent pics.

My bad, It was a Verizon problem. When they upgraded my phone they were supposed to remove all blocks on messaging . Found out they did not do this. All messaging now works. Thanks for listening.

Resulting Word File Contains All Jumbled Text?

Just uploaded and converted my file using ExportPDF. Word file was created without issue. When it is opened all styles are maintained but text is jumbled:
Bo!fnqmpzff!iboecppl!jt!b!nbovbm!uibu!dpoubjot!bo!fnqmpzfsÖt!xpsl!svmft!boe!qpmjdjft/!Ju!dbo!bmtp!dpoubjo!puifs! jogpsnbujpo!uibu!jt!vtfgvm!up!uif!fnqmpzff-!tvdi!bt!uif!cvtjofttÖt!ijtupsz-!jut!hpbmt-!boe !jut!dpnnjunfout!up dvtupnfst!ps!dpnnvojuz/
How do I fix?

Something to be mindful of is the item within our FAQ:
Will Adobe ExportPDF convert both text and formatting information?Adobe ExportPDF is capable of exporting high quality information, but the quality of your Word document depends on the quality of the PDF file you start with. For instance, if your PDF file was originally authored in Microsoft Word and converted to PDF using the PDF Maker functionality in Adobe Acrobat® software, your PDF file contains a rich set of information that can be captured by Adobe ExportPDF. This includes relative positioning of tables, images, and even multicolumn text, as well as page, paragraph, and font attributes. If your PDF file was originally authored using simpler PDF generation methods, such as “print to PDF” or “scan to PDF” options, Adobe ExportPDF will convert any recognizable text and then use sophisticated conversion intelligence to preserve as much of the page layout as possible.
So while we are always trying to improve the service, there are many factors that could be influencing your result.

TS3140 I tried to order a book on iPhoto but got the following message from apple : the file contains text with drop shadows. As a result, Apple is unable to process your order" Does anyone know what this means and how to fix it? Thanks!!

I tried to order a book on iphoto but got the following message from Apple : "the file contains text with drop shadows. As a result Apple is unable to process your order" Does anyone know what this means and how to fix it? Thanks!!

Hello Katiebell62
Check out the troubleshooting steps to try and resolve your issue with purchasing a book through iPhoto.
iPhoto: Difficulty submitting a book, card, or calendar order
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2516
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
Regards,
-Norm G.

Saving query results to text file

Hi experts,
I would like to save a query results to text file.
The query has desined to the correct structure and I wish the query results will be saved automaticly to text file every time the query is running.
The query should cintain some sql code that will save the query to text file instead of show the query results.
What function of SQL should I add to query to achieve that goal. (The query is a long one).
Thanks in advance,
Joseph

If you are talking about Query Manager, it is not difficult to do. No matter how long your query coding is, just go to the start point of your query. Then press CtrlShiftEnd to select all the TEXTs. CtrlC and CtrlV will copy the text (query codes) to text file easily.
Thanks,
Gordon

How can I correct "hidden" text in a searchable PDF file?

This seems like a simple question. However, the answers are invariably complex, do not yield the desired result, and often answer a different question entirely. I say all that just to warn people up front that the "problem" is easier than how many people and PDF application developers, including Adobe, typically understand it while the proposed "solutions" are invariably a total...well, botch is a reasonable word if a bit understated.
Here is the actual problem:
I have "searchable" PDF files created by scanning documents and running them through an OCR process. I create "searchable" PDF files in order to archive, index, and eventually enable searching for the documents scanned. A "searchable" PDF satisfies those criteria better than any other commonly used, "portable" archive format -- though I would be happy if someone could point out an obvious alternative I may have overlooked. I do not need perfect OCR results. If I need a document to edit or perhaps feed into a spreadsheet or database, I expect to be able to reprocess the page images in a given "searchable" PDF file to OCR and convert the contents to Word, RTF, Excel, or another file format as necessary with more care for the results than for the archived document itself. Therefore, the "searchable" PDF document is the scanned page images which compose it while the OCR generated "searchable" text is secondary, but still important. Therefore, each file must contain scanned page images of sufficient detail to be efficiently converted by OCR if possible and legible enough for whoever views the images to be able to work out what an OCR process may fail to understand. Once scanned, those pages are the "document" and therefore "immutable." However, OCR is imperfect. For a searchable document archive, it does not have to be, but some errors are significant in that they may prevent the document from being found by a search. Therefore, there must be a way to view and, if necessary, edit the "hidden" text in a "searchable" PDF without altering the visual display of a document or how it is printed. No strike-throughs. No visible "corrections." None of the stuff PDF editors want to insert into a PDF file when editing it. I do not want to edit the document without exporting it to a format appropriate for an editable document. I just want adequately "correct" hidden text in a "searchable" PDF file.
I apologize for the length and redundancy in my description of the problem. However, past attempts to explain my problem and objectives as well as what I have seen in reply to similar queries across the Internet indicate that most people trying to answer this question come at it from the same point of view shared by most, if not all, PDF tool or application vendors. They seem to think that any desire to edit a PDF file is a desire to have a PDF word processor of some sort. Or, they assume that the OCR process employed may need tweaking of the means by which people apply it and then a process like "find suspects" is adequate to deal with any errors. But no, those are not what I am trying to accomplish and answers which address those topics do not answer this question.
In short, which tool or application from any vendor will reveal the "searchable" hidden text in a PDF produced by any OCR or other process and then enable corrections to the hidden text without changing any document display parameters at all? Note, hidden text typically includes bounding box information denoting the portion of the image from which the text was recognized. That information must not be lost or changed when editing the "searchable" text.
So, any tools or applications capable of doing this? If Adobe Acrobat XI Pro can (use of a trial copy demonstrated that the hidden text content can be reviewed, but editing did not work by any straight-forward means I could work out while trying out the application), fine. However, $500.00 list or even a $200.00 possible upgrade from a copy of Adobe Acrobat X Standard which came with my scanner is a lot of money for personal use when review and edit of the OCR generated hidden text in a "searchable" PDF file is the only function I require. Therefore, other suggested tools or applications which do what I need for less would be greatly appreciated.

My "claim"? Actually I've made no "claim" such as you've mentioned.
Simply stated your OP has foundational premises that presume as factual what is not.
Here, we're in Adobe's hosted user forum for Acrobat.
Any other application use is not material.
Acrobat XI provides 3 OCR methods.
Searchable Image, Searchable Image (Exact) & ClearScan.
Only the first two provide the "hidden" text output.
(Glyphs have no stroke, no fill)
From back to the Acrobat 3 product family the design functionality of Searchable Image and Searchable Image (Exact) has been to facilitate the use of Find / Search.
The "hidden" text is can be touched up. Acrobat Pro provides the facility to view the hidden text.
So you can see what the OCR output that correlates to the bit-map images of the characters that are present.
With Acrobat XI Pro use Tools - Protection -Remove Hidden Information
In the Remove Hidden Information pane select "Hidden text" then "Show preview".
The default for the preview is "Show Only Hidden Text".
Back in the PDF --
You'd select some of the hidden text and retype what you suspect is the correct string of characters.
Save and return to the preview of the hidden text.
If you got it right, good. Continue.
If not, darn - try again.
Plug 'n chug -- somewhere over the rainbow it'll be done eh.
Full disclosure -- this is something I've done (enquiring minds don't you know).
I've found it to be a rather Sisypean undertaking.
So, "doable" but not practicable.
This is to be expected because such touchups are not the concern / focus of the output from Searchable Image or Searchable Image (Exact) - (the names tell it all).
To have touchup "editablity" of an OCR output using Acrobat make use of ClearScan.
ClearScan replaces recognized character bit-maps with a character from an Acrobat internal font.
The character strings can be selected to change to a generic, system available font.
Something that is good to know when embarking on the "tweak the PDF" journey is that PDF (the file format / technology as defined by its ISO Standard, ISO 32000-1) does not tolerate "editing". PDF is decidely not a word processor file format and "editing" can quickly render a PDF unusable.
Minor touchups can be made and your best "tool" for this is still Acrobat Pro. (Save As often and periodically "bank" the PDF via some file rename scheme.)
Be well...

Issue using Tools- Options- Result to Text to customize column delimiter

Hi all,
I need to export a large dataset (greater than 6 GB) to text file.
Since the dataset contains special characters, I cannot use Import and Export Wizard to export it into text file. (Error Message).
So I used Tools --> Options --> Result to Text. However, I cannot actually customize the delimiter.
First of all, I can only enter one character as the delimiter, and thus no character combination allowed.
Secondly, I entered # and ^ as the customized delimiter. Neither of them worked. The delimiter is always | (pipe), which does not work well for my dataset.
Does anybody have the same experience? Please help.
Thanks.

You don't need to do a replace, I think it will complicate the things.
Use the Import-Export Wizard to export the data.
If you have "|" in your data still you can go ahead and use the pipe character as delimiter. However in that case you should mention the text qualifier which will be used to enclose each column value.
This can be a single or many characters.
and here is how my output looked like after I exported the below table
create table TestExport(id int identity(1,1), textdata varchar(100))
insert into TestExport values('Some|deletimete~data');
I used " (double quote) as the text qualifier here
Here you will be able to distinguish between the actual delimiter and the delimiter character appearing in the data.
While exporting the data into the another data destination(I am assuming you are not going to sit and read a 6GB text file:) ), you can mention the same text qualifier and import the data
Satheesh
My Blog |
How to ask questions in technical forum

Schedule Webi report to CSV - text qualifier

Hi
We are running the latest version of Business Objects 4.0 SP04 (FP3) with Patch 1.
I am having a problem scheduling a Webi report to CSV format. The text qualifier option only allows the choice of ' (single quote). Not only is the text qualifier on text fields - it's also on numeric fields. This obviously causes a problem for Excel and other systems.
Is there a way of removing or replacing this text qualifier or preventing numeric fields from been wrapped with the text qualifier?
We are not having this problem with the interactive "Save as - TXT file" option.
Thanks for any input on this.
Kieran

Hi Experts,
Seeking your opinion on the following issue,
We are in version SAP BO 4.0 SP 4 Update
While trying to schedule a report with as CSV, the only option available as the Text qualifier is single quote ( ' ). Any sort of clue on why we don't see the option "None" listed in the combo?
Thanks,
Thilani

With "Download Headers" option checked, opening plain text emails results in cropped body text

When I open raw plain text emails (i.e. not formatted as HTML) I only see the first
255 characters of the email body; all of the remainder is chopped off, and never appears no matter how many times I re-open the email.
I have narrowed this down to my somewhat unusual download preferences in Outlook. They are configured as follows:
Send/Receive -> Download Preferences -> Download Headers (checked).
I know the email text is there in full, because when I point my web browser at OWA, I can see the full body.
If at first I choose Mark to Download and then Process Marked Headers, I can then open the plain text email and see the body in full.
When I open HTML emails I have no problems, regardless of whether the email download was forced or not.
This issue existed on my old Office 2010 installation for XP too. It persists now I have upgraded to Office 2013 on Win 7.
This is not an acknowledged issue yet within the Outlook team (in fact, a possibly related issue was
reported by someone else 3 months ago but suggested to be a font corruption issue, which is incorrect).
It seems like Outlook just forgets to download the full text for plain text emails when opening them. It's repeatable every time, so it doesn't seem like a race condition. (To reproduce: set your Inbox download preferences as above, then send
yourself a plain text email, wait for the Inbox headers to finish refreshing and then open the new email).
We use a 3rd party provider (Cobweb) for our email service and I believe they are using Exchange 2013.
We use ESET Smart Security Suite and I have tried disabling the scanner for that but see no change in the outcome. I would appreciate if anyone without ESET could try to reproduce these steps for themselves and confirm.
Starting Outlook in Safe Mode does not solve it.
Note: I already asked this
question at the Office Community site and it was suggested I
post on the Exchange Server Outlook Clients forum. The feedback there suggested it to be client related, so now I've been directed to post here!
Thanks,
Marcel

Hi Melon, thanks for your response.
My plain text font is set up as the default, Automatic.
In any case, I can see the first 255 characters of the plain text body, so plain text font colour can be eliminated as a potential problem.
After the 255th character, the body text then stops. There are no "hidden characters". If I shrink the window height to accommodate just what I see, the vertical scrollbar does not appear. This confirms that there are no hidden lines of text
below.
The mail is simply not downloaded from the server correctly. If I drag the mail onto my desktop, then view that file in Programmer's Notepad, I can see that after the position representing the 255th character in the body of the email, there is garbage (control
characters).
If, instead, I first mark the email for downloaded and then click the "process marked headers", wait for it to download and then drag it onto my desktop, by contrast, the body contents look complete and this is reflected in the fact that I can
see the whole email when I open it in Outlook.
This problem has so far affected me on four different PC setups (1xWinXP, 3xWin7) and two versions of Outlook (2010 and 2013). However, Cobweb -- our cloud email provider -- did recently upgrade to Exchange 2013, so that might be an important factor.
I don't think I can remember seeing these plain text issues in the 10 years previous to that upgrade during which I've been using various flavours of Outlook.
I have supplied repro steps in the original report above. Could someone please try these? I have expanded them in full below for simplicity:
To reproduce:
1. Change your download preferences in Outlook. They are configured from the ribbon bar as follows (assuming you are using Outlook in Cached Exchange mode, connecting to Exchange 2013):
Send/Receive -> Download Preferences -> Download Headers (checked).
2. Send yourself a plain text email containing more than 300 characters of text.
3. Wait for the Inbox headers to finish refreshing.
4. Open the new email.
Result: The email body will be truncated at the 255th character.
Expected: The email body should show all the characters.

Search Results Query Text - Get all data, Exclude all list data except one

Hi Experts,
I have a situation wherein in the global search of our internal site, we have to display all results & restrict any list item except one list. Earlier we had restricted /Lists/ & People to be displayed in the results.
But in the new search results I have to display results from only one list along with other results (documents, sites, pages etc).
Below is the original query text entered in the Search Results Query Text editor
{searchboxquery} -contentclass:STS_List_Links
-filename:allitems.aspx -Path:/articles/Pages/default.aspx
-filename:DispForm.aspx -Path:/Lists/ -Path:person.aspx
I have tried various different queries with AND, OR operator. I have researched other blogs, sites over google. But unsuccessful. I am sure this is not a rare requirement. Need your expert help.
I have tried this query also...
{searchboxquery} (-filename:allitems.aspx -Path:/articles/Pages/ -Path:/Lists/ -Path:/PublishingImages/) OR
(+(+Path: /Lists/ArticleContent/ AND +filename:*.aspx) AND
-(-Path: */Lists/* OR -filename:*.aspx))
Vighnesh Bendre
MCTS
http://markviky.blogspot.com

Vighnesh,
You should have success using the following:
{searchboxquery} -contentclass:STS_List_Links -filename:allitems.aspx -Path:/articles/Pages/default.aspx -Path:person.aspx ((-filename:DispForm.aspx -Path:/Lists/) OR Path:/Lists/ArticleContent/)
Two things from your original query were excluding list items from your results, your exclusion of file
DispForm.aspx and path Lists. By using "OR" in the above query, we're creating an exception to also allow items under
Lists/ArticleContent to be included in the results.

Call same smartform in program with different text - same result

Hello,
I'm facing the following problem:
In a program, a certain smartforms form can be called multiple times. Only the text can change, depending on the user action.
However, the resulting form does not show different text for the different actions. The first time it is used, the text is correct, but from the second time onwards, the text in the form will still be same than the first time.
The text type in the smartform is 'include text', so I can see in the standard text transaction (so10) that the text was indeed changed correctly. But still it shows the same text in the result.
Is there some option I have missed?
Thanks

Hi,
You can use COMMIT_TEXT.
The system keeps all text modules for which you defined 'storage in update task' in the corresponding text object in the text memory. As soon as it updates the corresponding application object, it must also place the text modules into the log file.
The function module COMMIT_TEXT generates for the text modules in the text object a CALL FUNCTION... IN UPDATE TASK statement in accordance with the action to be executed (delete, create, change).
No COMMIT WORK is created. This must be executed by the application program.
If you do not specify OBJECT, NAME, ID, and LANGUAGE, the system transfers all texts from the text memory. To limit the function to certain texts, enter values (fully or generically) in the above fields. The system then selects all texts that match the selections in the fields up to the first ' * '.
By default, the system deletes texts from the text memory as soon as they are written to the log file. If you want to keep updated texts in the text memory, call the function module with the parameter KEEP = 'X'. The system then keeps the texts in the text memory and flags them as updated. When calling COMMIT_TEXT again, the system ignores these texts. If you change such a text again during the transaction (for example, using SAVE_TEXT or DELETE_TEXT), the system deletes the flag. However, you need another COMMIT_TEXT to update the text.
<b>Reward if helpful.</b>

SSIS none text qualifier results in text file containing "_x003C_none_x003E"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for