SSL bug confirmed, with workaround.

As some may have noticed there is a bug in webOS that prevent some web sites from loading and some email servers from being used.
In a chat with PALM support the other day, they confirmed that all webOS phones failed to load a web site (https://mail.eldenmalm.com) where as all other devices and phones did not have any problem.
I "received" this bug with the 2.1.0 update - did not have it before.
I workaround this problem by "browsing" to the URL using IP instead of domain name. Naturally the browser will through a "certificate error" and prompt you to "trust" this certificate or not. Once it is trusted you can also use the IP for mail purposes.
Regards,
Jan
Post relates to: Pre Plus p100ueu (SFR)

HP has logged this in its software issue tracking system. We endeavor to continuously improve our software quality and thank you for bringing this to our attention. We are grateful to the community and will evaluate options based on customer feedback and software best practices. Also thank you for posting the workaround
Also if you are aware of any other sample sites doing this can you please convey them to me too? Also does the site have a non-secure access? Also can you tell me if this URL redirects to another url/ip? Thanks in advance!
Could I also get a log file from your device? Please let me know and I will send you a private message with steps.

Similar Messages

Ssl-handshake fails with scandinavian chars in client certificate

Hello,
We've run into a problem with 2-way-ssl and certificates that have scandinavian
characters in the subject. The problem cert is used as client-certificate for
authentication and it goes like this:
1. Client surfs with http in our site, until clicks https-link that will immediately
start the ssl-handshake
2. Server presents it's trusted cert-list fine
3. PIN is being asked fine
4. Next the request processing stops on the exception below and nothing will happen
on the client side.
Certs without these äöå -chars work fine, so our guess is that they cause it,
but the certs ought to be according to specs: name-fields encoding is UTF-8 according
to RFC 2459 from year 1999. A failing example-cert is also below.
Would this be a problem with the certificate rather than BEA-implementation?
Same behavior on Windows and Solaris Weblogic 8.11 as such and with SP2 (and with
sp2 + CASE_ID_NUM: 501454 hotfix).
Best Regards,
Igor Styrman
<avalable(): 20303264 : 0 + 0 = 0>
<write ALERT offset = 0 length = 2>
<SSLIOContextTable.removeContext(ctx): 1765100>
PM EEST><SSLListenThread.Default> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <Filtering JSSE
SSLSocket>
PM EEST><SSLListenThread.Default> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <SSLIOContextTable.addContext(ctx):
6487148>
PM EEST><SSLListenThread.Default> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <SSLSocket will
be Muxing>
PM EEST><SSLListenThread.Default> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <SSLIOContextTable.findContext(is):
11153746>
<SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<isMuxerActivated: false>
<SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<21647856 readRecord()>
<21647856 SSL Version 2 with no padding>
<21647856 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<21647856 received SSL_20_RECORD>
<HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: ClientHelloV2>
<write HANDSHAKE offset = 0 length = 58>
<write HANDSHAKE offset = 0 length = 1789>
<Converting principal: OU=Class 4 Public Primary Certification Authority, O="VeriSign,
Inc.", C=US>
<Converting principal: CN=SHP ROOT CA, O=SHP, C=FI>
<Converting principal: CN=topsel, O=Fujitsu Services Oy, C=FI>
<Converting principal: CN=GTE CyberTrust Global Root, OU="GTE CyberTrust Solutions,
Inc.", O=GTE Corporation, C=US>
<Converting principal: CN=SatShp CA, O=Satakunnan sairaanhoitopiiri, C=FI>
<Converting principal: OU=Class 1 Public Primary Certification Authority, O="VeriSign,
Inc.", C=US>
<Converting principal: [email protected], CN=Thawte Personal
Basic CA, OU=Certification Services Division, O=Thawte Consulting, L=Cape Town,
ST=Western Cape, C=ZA>
<Converting principal: [email protected], CN=Thawte Personal
Freemail CA, OU=Certification Services Division, O=Thawte Consulting, L=Cape Town,
ST=Western Cape, C=ZA>
<Converting principal: OU=Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority, O="VeriSign,
Inc.", C=US>
<Converting principal: CN=GTE CyberTrust Root, O=GTE Corporation, C=US>
<Converting principal: [email protected], CN=Thawte Server
CA, OU=Certification Services Division, O=Thawte Consulting cc, L=Cape Town, ST=Western
Cape, C=ZA>
<Converting principal: [email protected], CN=Thawte Personal
Premium CA, OU=Certification Services Division, O=Thawte Consulting, L=Cape Town,
ST=Western Cape, C=ZA>
<Converting principal: [email protected], CN=Thawte Premium
Server CA, OU=Certification Services Division, O=Thawte Consulting cc, L=Cape
Town, ST=Western Cape, C=ZA>
<Converting principal: OU=Secure Server Certification Authority, O="RSA Data Security,
Inc.", C=US>
<Converting principal: CN=Baltimore CyberTrust Root, OU=CyberTrust, O=Baltimore,
C=IE>
<Converting principal: CN=Fujitsu Test CA, O=Fujitsu Services Oy, C=FI>
<Converting principal: CN=GTE CyberTrust Root 5, OU="GTE CyberTrust Solutions,
Inc.", O=GTE Corporation, C=US>
<Converting principal: CN=PSHP CA, O=Pirkanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri, C=FI>
<Converting principal: CN=Baltimore CyberTrust Code Signing Root, OU=CyberTrust,
O=Baltimore, C=IE>
<Converting principal: OU=Class 2 Public Primary Certification Authority, O="VeriSign,
Inc.", C=US>
<write HANDSHAKE offset = 0 length = 2409>
<write HANDSHAKE offset = 0 length = 4>
<SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<isMuxerActivated: false>
<SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<21647856 readRecord()>
<21647856 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<21647856 received HANDSHAKE>
<HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: Certificate>
PM EEST> <Error> <Kernel> <> <satshpeduServer> <ExecuteThread: '14' for queue:
'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <BEA-000802> <ExecuteRequest failed
java.lang.NullPointerException: Could not set value for ASN.1 string object..
java.lang.NullPointerException: Could not set value for ASN.1 string object.
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1String.setValue(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1String.setBufferTo(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeString(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1String.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.pkix.AttributeTypeAndValue.decodeContents(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeStructured(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeSequence(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Sequence.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1SetOf.decodeContents(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeStructured(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeSetOf(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1SetOf.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1SequenceOf.decodeContents(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeStructured(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeSequence(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Sequence.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.pkix.Name.decodeContents(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Choice.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.pkix.TBSCertificate.decodeContents(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeStructured(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeSequence(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Sequence.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.pkix.Certificate.decodeContents(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeStructured(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeSequence(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Sequence.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Type.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.cert.internal.x509.X509V3CertImpl.<init>(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.handshake.MessageCertificate.<init>(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.handshake.HandshakeMessage.create(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.handshake.HandshakeHandler.handleHandshakeMessages(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.interpretContent(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readRecord(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readUntilHandshakeComplete(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.interfaceimpl.TLSConnectionImpl.completeHandshake(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.net.ssl.CerticomContextWrapper.forceHandshakeOnAcceptedSocket(Unknown
Source)
     at weblogic.t3.srvr.SSLListenThread$1.execute(SSLListenThread.java:514)
     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:197)
     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:170)
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----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-----END CERTIFICATE-----

BMPString is another asn1 type that can be used for certificate attributes with
non-ascii characters. The workaround is simply to use the BMPString instead of
UTF8String for that subject name attribute in the certificate request. This off-course
assumes that you can replace the certificate, and have control over what asn1
type is used for the subject name attributes in the certificate request (via a
tool options, or by generating the request yourself), so it is probably not applicable.
Pavel.
"Ari Räisänen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Thanks again, Pavel!
I'm filing a support case about this. You talked about a workaround (BMPString).
Could you be more spesific? I haven't talked about this issue with Igor
yet.
Regards,
Ari
"Pavel" <[email protected]> wrote:
Sounds like a bug in certicom code. It should support UTF8String.
I'd file a support case.
You might be able to use BMPString instead as a workaround.
Pavel.
"Igor Styrman" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
We've run into a problem with 2-way-ssl and certificates that have
scandinavian
characters in the subject. The problem cert is used as client-certificate
for
authentication and it goes like this:
1. Client surfs with http in our site, until clicks https-link thatwill
immediately
start the ssl-handshake
2. Server presents it's trusted cert-list fine
3. PIN is being asked fine
4. Next the request processing stops on the exception below and nothing
will happen
on the client side.
Certs without these äöå -chars work fine, so our guess is that they
cause it,
but the certs ought to be according to specs: name-fields encoding
is
UTF-8 according
to RFC 2459 from year 1999. A failing example-cert is also below.
Would this be a problem with the certificate rather than BEA-implementation?
Same behavior on Windows and Solaris Weblogic 8.11 as such and withSP2
(and with
sp2 + CASE_ID_NUM: 501454 hotfix).
Best Regards,
Igor Styrman
<avalable(): 20303264 : 0 + 0 = 0>
<write ALERT offset = 0 length = 2>
<SSLIOContextTable.removeContext(ctx): 1765100>
PM EEST><SSLListenThread.Default> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <Filtering
JSSE
SSLSocket>
PM EEST><SSLListenThread.Default> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <SSLIOContextTable.addContext(ctx):
6487148>
PM EEST><SSLListenThread.Default> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <SSLSocket
will
be Muxing>
PM EEST><SSLListenThread.Default> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <000000> <SSLIOContextTable.findContext(is):
11153746>
<SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<isMuxerActivated: false>
<SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<21647856 readRecord()>
<21647856 SSL Version 2 with no padding>
<21647856 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<21647856 received SSL_20_RECORD>
<HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: ClientHelloV2>
<write HANDSHAKE offset = 0 length = 58>
<write HANDSHAKE offset = 0 length = 1789>
<Converting principal: OU=Class 4 Public Primary Certification Authority,
O="VeriSign,
Inc.", C=US>
<Converting principal: CN=SHP ROOT CA, O=SHP, C=FI>
<Converting principal: CN=topsel, O=Fujitsu Services Oy, C=FI>
<Converting principal: CN=GTE CyberTrust Global Root, OU="GTE CyberTrust
Solutions,
Inc.", O=GTE Corporation, C=US>
<Converting principal: CN=SatShp CA, O=Satakunnan sairaanhoitopiiri,
C=FI>
<Converting principal: OU=Class 1 Public Primary Certification Authority,
O="VeriSign,
Inc.", C=US>
<Converting principal: [email protected], CN=Thawte
Personal
Basic CA, OU=Certification Services Division, O=Thawte Consulting,
L=Cape
Town,
ST=Western Cape, C=ZA>
<Converting principal: [email protected], CN=Thawte
Personal
Freemail CA, OU=Certification Services Division, O=Thawte Consulting,
L=Cape Town,
ST=Western Cape, C=ZA>
<Converting principal: OU=Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority,
O="VeriSign,
Inc.", C=US>
<Converting principal: CN=GTE CyberTrust Root, O=GTE Corporation, C=US>
<Converting principal: [email protected], CN=Thawte
Server
CA, OU=Certification Services Division, O=Thawte Consulting cc, L=Cape
Town, ST=Western
Cape, C=ZA>
<Converting principal: [email protected], CN=Thawte
Personal
Premium CA, OU=Certification Services Division, O=Thawte Consulting,
L=Cape Town,
ST=Western Cape, C=ZA>
<Converting principal: [email protected], CN=Thawte
Premium
Server CA, OU=Certification Services Division, O=Thawte Consultingcc,
L=Cape
Town, ST=Western Cape, C=ZA>
<Converting principal: OU=Secure Server Certification Authority, O="RSA
Data Security,
Inc.", C=US>
<Converting principal: CN=Baltimore CyberTrust Root, OU=CyberTrust,O=Baltimore,
C=IE>
<Converting principal: CN=Fujitsu Test CA, O=Fujitsu Services Oy, C=FI>
<Converting principal: CN=GTE CyberTrust Root 5, OU="GTE CyberTrustSolutions,
Inc.", O=GTE Corporation, C=US>
<Converting principal: CN=PSHP CA, O=Pirkanmaan sairaanhoitopiiri,
C=FI>
<Converting principal: CN=Baltimore CyberTrust Code Signing Root, OU=CyberTrust,
O=Baltimore, C=IE>
<Converting principal: OU=Class 2 Public Primary Certification Authority,
O="VeriSign,
Inc.", C=US>
<write HANDSHAKE offset = 0 length = 2409>
<write HANDSHAKE offset = 0 length = 4>
<SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<isMuxerActivated: false>
<SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<21647856 readRecord()>
<21647856 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<21647856 received HANDSHAKE>
<HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: Certificate>
PM EEST> <Error> <Kernel> <> <satshpeduServer> <ExecuteThread: '14'
for queue:
'weblogic.kernel.Default'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <BEA-000802> <ExecuteRequest
failed
java.lang.NullPointerException: Could not set value for ASN.1 string
object..
java.lang.NullPointerException: Could not set value for ASN.1 string
object.
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1String.setValue(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1String.setBufferTo(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeString(UnknownSource)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1String.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.pkix.AttributeTypeAndValue.decodeContents(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeStructured(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeSequence(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Sequence.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1SetOf.decodeContents(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeStructured(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeSetOf(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1SetOf.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1SequenceOf.decodeContents(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeStructured(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeSequence(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Sequence.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.pkix.Name.decodeContents(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Choice.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.pkix.TBSCertificate.decodeContents(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeStructured(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeSequence(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Sequence.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.pkix.Certificate.decodeContents(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeStructured(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.DERInputStream.decodeSequence(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Sequence.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.asn1.ASN1Type.decode(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.security.cert.internal.x509.X509V3CertImpl.<init>(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.handshake.MessageCertificate.<init>(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.handshake.HandshakeMessage.create(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.handshake.HandshakeHandler.handleHandshakeMessages(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.interpretContent(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readRecord(Unknown Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.record.ReadHandler.readUntilHandshakeComplete(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.tls.interfaceimpl.TLSConnectionImpl.completeHandshake(Unknown
Source)
     at com.certicom.net.ssl.CerticomContextWrapper.forceHandshakeOnAcceptedSocket(Unknown
Source)
     at weblogic.t3.srvr.SSLListenThread$1.execute(SSLListenThread.java:514)
     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:197)
     at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:170)
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIID+zCCAuOgAwIBAgIDFm/PMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMEUxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkZJ
MRwwGgYDVQQKExNGdWppdHN1IFNlcnZpY2VzIE95MRgwFgYDVQQDEw9GdWppdHN1
IFRlc3QgQ0EwHhcNMDQwNjAyMTE1MjE4WhcNMDYwNjAyMTIyMjE4WjB3MQswCQYD
VQQGEwJGSTEQMA4GA1UEChMHRnVqaXRzdTEgMB4GA1UEAwwXSMO2bG3DtmzDpGlu
ZW4gw4VrZSAwMDExDDAKBgNVBAUTAzAwMTEXMBUGA1UEBAwOSMO2bG3DtmzDpGlu
ZW4xDTALBgNVBCoMBMOFa2UwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAO44
Zm31uJb8048/6PByPyXzaW3gCz1mT02TuwVtjMRJ4ObbFCqMGC+YosA2kNKoW0Ef
C+YlKNqhvaid0bATQefdSHVQhzFL3HFIfZc3ONAJQ/U+I6W69r2JePoCvZppknmC
YrnCCDx3Ap27B7v57f/XTmdpiB8IdiCTl3PnV78PAgMBAAGjggFEMIIBQDAfBgNV
HSMEGDAWgBT8T+xYc3T6j89O8cZ4hC9r1e9DojAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUtS4z8K26uW2d
IeJ3aelDnqnkBnYwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgSwMFMGA1UdEQRMMEqgKwYKKwYBBAGCNxQC
A6AdDBtha2UuaG9sbW9sYWluZW5AZnVqaXRzdS5jb22BG2FrZS5ob2xtb2xhaW5l
bkBmdWppdHN1LmNvbTB9BgNVHR8EdjB0MHKgcKBuhmxsZGFwOi8vMjEyLjI0Ni4y
MjIuMTQyOjM4OS9DTj1GdWppdHN1JTIwVGVzdCUyMENBLE89RnVqaXRzdSUyMFNl
cnZpY2VzJTIwVGVzdCxDPUZJP2NlcnRpZmljYXRlcmV2b2NhdGlvbmxpc3QwHQYD
VR0lBBYwFAYIKwYBBQUHAwQGCCsGAQUFBwMCMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQAZ
KV3Og/y6zUOMwZGswUxAne5fe4Ab70bmX+z49MVeA0dfdQwQdR9GwFVF+fcK+q0T
3Lmcwpm5KiHWYoIOxPb6MqTTWxV7HSXWr7A7P4BbTGxsujpUULcmQGQFAd69R0Ur
JFDwYnDEP2+4RzrvlP6AWspyHJePYmCt9h3JfxYAqVLTL0suO1uh8hgtStujmqsI
0WNCfnQ+sURdDzp6WpVFcxFQa5aAcyx9sWWqV5Ta5l6JTCmoHth7qoV3BtUKv4+z
SqIHKA1ixrvlhqWkjYxg51N6ihbbR5shBRRinAqRIQjTzXmun2wJzwNigt4zWiNg
tvrGCMOrvrb5QTxVtLNr
-----END CERTIFICATE-----

ITunes 11 is a bag of hurt in Snow Leopard (multiple bugs) - Fixes? Workarounds?

iTunes 11 is a bag of hurt in Snow Leopard (multiple bugs) - Fixes? Workarounds?
I had been using iTunes 11.0.2 in Snow Leopard 10.6.8 on early 2011 Mac Book Pro. When I went to iTunes store on August 1, it would no longer display the iTunes store, it shows just a blank white screen. Upgrading to the current iTunes 11.0.4 does not help, I still get white screens when I try to go to the iTunes store. If I run iTunes 11.0.2 on a different Lion machine it displays the store just fine.
Before this crippling issue began, I was having two other problems with iTunes 11.
1) When I was able and did view app descriptions in the iTunes store, I would try to click on the links for reviews, or related apps, etc, and none of the links worked. This problems also does not occur in Lion.
2) Also, I really do not like the new app sync buttons, "Remove", "Will Remove", "Update", "Will Update". Sometimes iTunes becomes confused on the state of an app, especially when I sync two devices to have the same apps on each. Also, when I have many apps, its a pain to find and click all the "Update" buttons to make them say "Will Update" as I have to read the buttons closely. There should at least be a way to sort the apps by status so I can see all the ones that say "Update" together.
I am on Snow Leopard because I have some Mac apps that still require Rosetta and I do not wish to upgrade. However, it seems that even though Apple says iTunes is compatible with Snow Leopard, they are doing a poor job of testing it in Snow Leopard.
Anyone else seeing these issues with iTunes 11 in Snow Leopard? Any Fixes? Or Workarounds?

tkoyn wrote:
2) Also, I really do not like the new app sync buttons, "Remove", "Will Remove", "Update", "Will Update". Sometimes iTunes becomes confused on the state of an app, especially when I sync two devices to have the same apps on each. Also, when I have many apps, its a pain to find and click all the "Update" buttons to make them say "Will Update" as I have to read the buttons closely. There should at least be a way to sort the apps by status so I can see all the ones that say "Update" together.
You are simply not understanding how app updating works in iTunes 11. Apple has changed it up a bit. When viewing your apps in iTunes, along the top, directly under the LED display click the "updates" tab. This will show you all the apps that have available updates. Then click the "update" button in the lower right of the screen.
tkoyn wrote:
1) When I was able and did view app descriptions in the iTunes store, I would try to click on the links for reviews, or related apps, etc, and none of the links worked. This problems also does not occur in Lion.
This is generally a network issue. As a first trouble shooting step, restart your computer. If that does not work power cycling the internet modem will generally clear up the problem.

I have just transferred my application file from an Imac to an identical Imac, both running OS 10.9.5. When I attempt to open Photoshop 6, I am prompted for the serial number. I enter the serial number provided by Adobe, which I have confirmed with my "pr

I have just transferred my entire application file from an Imac to an identical Imac, both running OS 10.9.5. Everything works fine, excepting that when I attempt to open Photoshop 6, I am prompted for the serial number. I enter the serial number provided by Adobe, which I have confirmed with my "previous purchase" records kept by Adobe. It is demanding a "qualifying product", all of which is contained in the complete files I transferred. Why can't Adobe recognise my valid serial number for Photoshop 6?

I have just transferred my entire application file from an Imac to an identical Imac,
Say what?
Please use the proper installer.
Are you really talking about Photoshop 6 or about Photoshop CS6?

Goods confirmation with quantity 0 and final delivery set

Dear SRM Experts,
I would like to share with you the below problem that i asked to be answered from SAP support and would appreciate any solution suggestions for this problem.
The problem I'm facing is relevant for two of my clients: one using SRM 4.0 with ECC 5.0 and the other using SRM 5.0 with ECC 6.0.
I was looking for a note solution concerning goods receipt reappearing in the confirmation screen (BBPCF02) although the confirmed quantity was equal to the ordered quantity and by chance I came up against note 1292032 - Goods confirmation with quantity 0 and final delivery set; that was released after a long list of notes that DID ALLOW the posting of Goods confirmation with quantity 0 and final delivery set.
[Note 1292032|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1292032]
Applying this note through the note implementation or Support package will ELIMINATE the option for the Goods Recipient (that do not have and will not have a PO change authorization) to indicate in any way that he is not expecting to receive those goods.
Please follow the below example to exemplify this problem:
A PO was created as follow:
Item Product Quantity Price
1 A1 10 10
2 A2 10 12
3 A3 10 14
4 A4 10 16
5 A5 10 18
6 A6 10 20
A first confirmation was created for the following products and quantities:
Item Product Quantity Final Delivery
1 A1 5 X
4 A4 10
5 A5 2
A second and FINAL confirmation was created for the following products and quantities:
Item Product Quantity Final Delivery
2 A2 8 X
3 A3 10
So at the conclusion of the above example:
For items 1; 2; 3; 4 the delivery completed indicator should be set as all expected quantities were delivered, as per items 5 and 6 they will remain open and as of note 1292032 there will be no way that the Goods Recipient can indicate IN THE SYSTEM that he is not expecting any more deliveries (keep in mind that he do not have any PO change authorization), and the PO will remain as opened and will keep appearing in the Confirm Goods / Services transaction.
Sending an e-mail to the purchaser, asking to set the Delivery Completed indicator in the PO is not a feasible option as all process should be backed up by the system and sending e-mails cannot be monitored by the system.
Kind Regards,
Raz Golan
Edited by: Raz Golan on Sep 24, 2009 1:16 PM

.

Bug in WITH clause (subquery factoring clause) in Oracle 11?

I'm using WITH to perform a set comparison in order to qualify a given query as correct or incorrect regarding an existing solution. However, the query does not give the expected result - an empty set - when comparing the solution to itself in Oracle 11 whereas it does in Oracle 10. A minimal example os posted below as script. There are also some observations about changes to the tables or the query that make Oracle 11 returning correct results but in my opinion these changes must not change the semantics of the queries.
Is this a bug or am I getting something wrong? The Oracle versions are mentioned in the script.
-- Bug in WITH clause (subquery factoring clause)
-- in Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition 11.2.0.1.0?
DROP TABLE B PURGE;
DROP TABLE K PURGE;
DROP TABLE S PURGE;
CREATE TABLE S (
     m     number NOT NULL,
     x     varchar2(30) NOT NULL
CREATE TABLE K (
     k char(2) NOT NULL,
     x varchar2(50) NOT NULL
CREATE TABLE B (
     m     number NOT NULL ,
     k char(2) NOT NULL ,
     n     number
INSERT INTO S VALUES(1, 'h');
INSERT INTO S VALUES(2, 'l');
INSERT INTO S VALUES(3, 'm');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k1', 'd');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k2', 'i');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k3', 'm');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k4', 't');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k5', 't');
INSERT INTO K VALUES('k6', 's');
INSERT INTO B VALUES(1, 'k1', 40);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(1, 'k2', 30);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(1, 'k4', 50);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(3, 'k1', 10);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(3, 'k2', 20);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(3, 'k1', 30);
INSERT INTO B VALUES(3, 'k6', 90);
COMMIT;
ALTER TABLE S ADD CONSTRAINT S_pk PRIMARY KEY (m);
ALTER TABLE K ADD CONSTRAINT K_pk PRIMARY KEY (k);
ALTER TABLE B ADD CONSTRAINT B_S_fk
FOREIGN KEY (m) REFERENCES S(m) ON DELETE CASCADE;
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW v AS
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC;
-- Query 1: Result should be 0
WITH q AS
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
SELECT * FROM q
MINUS
SELECT * FROM v
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM v
MINUS
SELECT * FROM q
-- COUNT(*)
-- 6
-- 1 rows selected
-- Query 2: Result set should be empty (Query 1 without counting)
WITH q AS
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
SELECT *
FROM
SELECT * FROM q
MINUS
SELECT * FROM v
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM v
MINUS
SELECT * FROM q
-- M N
-- null 10
-- null 30
-- null 40
-- 1 40
-- 3 10
-- 3 30
-- 6 rows selected
-- Observations:
-- Incorrect results in Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition 11.2.0.1.0:
-- Query 1 returns 6, Query 2 returns six rows.
-- Correct in Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition 10.2.0.1.0.
-- Correct without the foreign key.
-- Correct if attribute x is renamed in S or K.
-- Correct if attribute x is left out in S.
-- Correct without the ORDER BY clause in the definition of q.
-- Only two results if the primary key on K is left out.
-- Correct without any change if not using WITH but subqueries (see below).
-- Fixed queries
-- Query 1b: Result should be 0
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM
SELECT * FROM
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
MINUS
SELECT * FROM v
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM v
MINUS
SELECT * FROM
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
-- COUNT(*)
-- 0
-- 1 rows selected
-- Query 2b: Result set shoud be empty (Query 1b without counting)
SELECT *
FROM
SELECT * FROM
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
MINUS
SELECT * FROM v
UNION ALL
SELECT * FROM v
MINUS
SELECT * FROM
SELECT S.m, B.n
FROM S JOIN B ON S.m=B.m JOIN K ON B.k=K.k
WHERE K.x='d'
ORDER BY B.n DESC
-- M N
-- 0 rows selected

You're all gonna love this one.....
The WITH clause works. But not easily.
Go ahead, build the query, (as noted in a recent thread, I, too, always use views), set the grants and make sure DISCOVERER and EULOWNER have SELECT privs.
1. Log into Disco Admin as EULOWNER. Trust me.
2. Add the view as a folder to the business area.
3. Log into Disco Desktop as EULOWNER. Don't laugh. It gets better.
4. Build the workbook and the worksheet (or just the worksheet if apropos)
5. Set the appropriate "sharing" roles and such
6. Save the workbook to the database.
7. Save the workbook to your computer.
8. Log out of Desktop.
9. Log back into Desktop as whatever, whoever you usually are to work.
10. elect "open existing workbook"
11. Select icon for "open from my computer". See? I told you it would get better!
12. Open the save .dis file from your computer.
13. Save it to the database.
14. Open a web browser and from there, you're on your own.
Fortran in VMS. Much easier and faster. I'm convinced the proliferation of the web is a detriment to the world at large...On the other hand, I'm also waiting for the Dodgers to return to Brooklyn.

Confirmation with Serial Number

Hi all,
Can anyone explain what's the purpose and how it works with confirmation with serial number? I already do customizing for one single entry confirmation to make serial number appear on CO11n.
regards,
Arman

What ever we entering the serial number In Confirmation, Its updating In COIB transaction after transfer you can see the list in
1) Go to IH20 or IH22
give the material No and serial No U can get the Installation Base No.
2) Go To IB53
give the installation No, U can see the assigned serial No . for header material
BUT there is no standard report for serial no relate with order operation
And the table related to serial No "EQUI" is no where link between the any Confirmation table.

PO Confirmations with Multiple Line items

Hi Experts,
In our Business Scenario, the Purchase Order Confirmations are being received by IDoc from Vendors. IDoc Basic Type is ORDERS01.
Issue is when we have one PO line item, then the IDoc is getting processed successfully. But when we have Multiple PO line items, then the IDoc is failing with the following error
Material number differs from that of ordered material 000000000001797950
Message no. ME790
Diagnosis
The acknowledgment/confirmation for purchase order no. 8195817140 with item 00002 cannot be adopted because the customer material number from the IDOC differs from the material number 000000000001797950 from the PO.
Procedure
Either change the customer material number in the IDOC or get the vendor to send a new acknowledgment/confirmation with the correct material number.
There is no control observed in the Material. For the second line item of the PO it is happening. If this Material is a first line item in the PO, then this issue won't be there.
Request for your inputs please
Thank you,
Best Regards,
Ramakrishna Mangena

Hi,
Use T code WE60 to search for the segment documentation of IDoc type
IDoc needs three different kinds of segment types:
E1EDK01 is the main segment of an ORDERS01 IDoc.Used for calling program to pass the SAP IDoc syntax check.
E1EDP01 is the segment for a single order position. The field MENGE contains the quantity. Of course, this segment can occur more the once.
E1EDP19 represents an object definition. In this case the object is a material number. The field QUALF is therefore set to 002 and the material number is written into the IDTNR field. E1EDP19 segments are always children of E1EDP01
Thanks & regards,
ShreeMohan

How to implement SSL for Portal with ADS (for Adobe besed MSS Application)

Hi Experts,
What is the Minimum setting is required to implement the SSL for Portal with ADS.
Http is working fine with Portal with ADS and R/3 for Adobe Based MSS Form.
Please let me know.
Regards
Ali

Rajat,
Nice to see your reply...
Could you please write me the steps how to do that.
I would like to implement SSL only in portal. So is that mandatory to implement the SSL in ADS and R/3 too.
Please what are the minimum setting is required.
Sure points will be rewarded
Regards
Ali

Confirmation with COR6N

Hi
I have a problem when I need to confirm my finished product with the trx COR6N, it only shows the components (261), but for the finished product I have to post the confirmation with MIGO. It only happens when I have more than one phase in my master recipe. If I have only one phase, the confirmation for my finished product can be posted in COR6N. My control key has the Aut. Goods receipt checked and confirmation required.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Your question is not clear...Automatic goods receipt is not happening when you have more than one phase?? is this is your issue......Automatic goods receipt setting can be done in two places....
1. Control key..assign the control key to the last phase and check...
2. Production scheduling profile..here also you can activate the automatic goods receipt indicator and assign this in work scheduling view in material master then check...
Thanks
Kumar

Cannot Print Order Confirmation with Smartforms

Dear Sir/ Madam,
I tried to print Order confirmation with Smartform but failed with the return message as "Output could not be issued".
The followings were my settings:.
At NACE, the Processing rouines confiugration for Application: V1, Output Type:BA00 was
Medium: 1 Print output
Program: R2RRVADOR01
Form routine: ENTRY
PDF/SmartForm Form: R2RBL_SDORC_L
Type: Smartform
At VA02, the output was added as:
Output: BA00
Description: Order Confirmation
Medium: 1 Printout
Func: SP
Lng: EN
Could anyone consult out?
Cheers,
Simon
Cheers,
Simon

HI,
In Txn. NACE... Select your "Application V1".. then choose the button "condition Record" then choose your output type then maintain the condtion..
Doc Type: <Value>
Function: SP
Medium 1
Date/Time: 4
Language:EN...
then choose the line and click on "Communication" button here maintain the "output Device, flag print immedieately/release After output.
and then try again.
If your using Smartform/Scriptform then you need to define like this:
Medium: 1 Print output
Program: R2RRVADOR01
Form routine: ENTRY
Form: R2RBL_SDORC_L
*PDF/SmartForm Form: *******Blank
*Type: ******Blank
Regards
GK.
Edited by: Gnana Kumar on Nov 17, 2010 5:24 AM

Overdelivery % ignores while confirmation with capacity category and splits

Dear all,
System ignores Over-delivery % while confirmation with capacity category and splits only.
Note:
1.Error message set for overdelivery in OPK4.
2.Check box for Unlimited Overdelivery in material master(Work Scheduling View) as well as in the production order is OFF.
Thanks,
Satyajit

Hi,
Set in OPK4=>
1)Overdelivery = Error when overdelivery tollerance is exceed.
Set in material MM02= in Work scheduling
1)Maintian Underdelivery Limit and Overdelivery Limit
2)Remove Tick of Indicator: Unlimited (Indicator: Unlimited Overdelivery Allowed)
Overdelivery tolerance limit=> Percent by which the quantity that is posted to goods receipt may exceed the production order quantity.
Indicator: Unlimited Overdelivery Allowed=> Indicator that specifies whether the quantity actually delivered may infinitely exceed the required production order quantity.
With Regards,
Ashish

User Exit for Production Order confirmation with CO15

Hi All,
what User Exit I should use when validating batch when we do Production Order confirmation with CO15.
Not when we create or release a Production Order.
Will reward,
mindaugas
Edited by: Mindaugas Kazlauskas on Jan 30, 2008 5:03 PM

Hi
The Follwing Userexits available:
    Transaction Code - CO15                     Enter Production order Confirmation
Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
CONFPP01
PP order conf.: Determine customer specific default values
CONFPP02
PP order conf.: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPP03
   PP order conf.: Cust. specific check after op. selection
CONFPP04
    PP order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPP05
   PP order conf.: Customer specific enhancements when saving
CONFPP06
   PP Order Confirmations: Actual Data Transfer
CONFPP07
   Single Screen Entry: Inclusion of User-Defined Subscreens
CONFPS01
   PS confirmation: Determine customer specific default values
CONFPS02
PS confirmation: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPS03
    PS confirmation: Customer specific check after op. selection
CONFPS04
   PS confirmation: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPS05
   PS confirmation: Customer specific enhancements when saving
CONF0001
Enhancements in order confirmation
CONFPI01
   Process order conf.: Calculate cust.specific default values
CONFPI02
   Process order confirmation: Customer spec. input checks 1
CONFPI03
   Process order conf.: Cust. spec. check after op. selection
CONFPI04
   Process order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPI05
   Process order conf.: Cust. spec. enhancements when saving
CONFPI06
Process order confirmation: Actual data transfer
CONFPM01
    PM/SM order conf.: Determine cust. specific default values
CONFPM02
    PM/SM order confirmation: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPM03
PM/SM order conf.: Cust. spec. check after op. selection
CONFPM04
   PM/SM order conf.: Customer specific input check 2
CONFPM05
   PM/SM order conf.: Cust. specific enhancements when saving
If it is helpful rewards points.
Regards
Pratp.M

Cancel the Confirmation with CN29

Hi All,
I have a activity with confirmed with the statsu of CONF. Now i need to concel the confirmation. Iam trying in CN29. But it is not turning back. Please guide for the solution.
Thanks in Advance.

in sap it will not turn back but post a reversal entry
is settlement done? if yes you need to reverse settlement first then reverse confirmation

IOS 7 bug list and workarounds

Here's the list of bugs I've found so far in iOS7 (I have an iPhone 4S). Anyone know workarounds, or better yet, fixes to them?
* volume disabled in Music appt
Workaround: have to unplug and replug headphones to enable.
Fix: unknown.
* calendar does not have a setting for list view
Workaround: now requires constantly clicking on magnifying glass
Fix: unknown
* ".com" button missing from keyboard layout when typing into URL field in Safari
Workaround: tap and hold '.'
Fix: unknown.
Anyone else want to contribute to the known bug list and workarounds?
Also, are iPhone 5 users experiencing the same problems? (I would assume so, but well, assumptions.)

dcltdw wrote:
* calendar does not have a setting for list view
Workaround: now requires constantly clicking on magnifying glass
A "bug" is an unintentional error in software. Though you may not like this change, it's fairly obviously working the way Apple intended.

SSL bug confirmed, with workaround​.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

SSL bug confirmed, with workaround.