SSL shouldn't be this difficult

Hello,
First off, SSL is NOT really difficult... it is that I am just frustrated with the "service provider" that I have to connect to. They are of no help what so ever when it comes to trying to help me figure out what is going on with the SSL connection.
OK, all the service provider has "provided" me is their address and port to connect to... which is for example https://xxx.yyy.zzz 5000
They say that I need to connect into this server on this port in order to send and receive secure messages... So with that I put this little test program together...
----------8<----------
import java.io.*;
import java.net.*;
import java.security.*;
import javax.net.*;
import javax.net.ssl.*;
public class SSLSocketClient
public static void main(String[] args)
SSLSocket s = null;
PrintStream out = System.out;
out.println("\nTesting socket factory with SSLContext:");
try
SSLContext sc = SSLContext.getInstance("SSLv3");
KeyManagerFactory kmf = KeyManagerFactory.getInstance("SunX509");
String ksName = "test.keystore";
char ksPass[] = "password".toCharArray();
char ctPass[] = "password".toCharArray();
KeyStore ks = KeyStore.getInstance("JKS");
ks.load(new FileInputStream(ksName), ksPass);
// Generating KeyManager list
kmf.init(ks,ctPass);
KeyManager[] kmList = kmf.getKeyManagers();
// Generating SSLSocketFactory
sc.init(kmList, null, null);
SSLSocketFactory sf = sc.getSocketFactory();
// Generating SSLSocket
s = (SSLSocket)sf.createSocket("ssltest.tnsi.com", 5004);
s.startHandshake();
InputStream inputstream = s.getInputStream();
InputStreamReader inputstreamreader = new InputStreamReader(inputstream);
BufferedReader bufferedreader = new BufferedReader(inputstreamreader);
OutputStream outputstream = s.getOutputStream();
OutputStreamWriter outputstreamwriter = new OutputStreamWriter(outputstream);
BufferedWriter bufferedwriter = new BufferedWriter(outputstreamwriter);
char[] message = {0x48, 0x45, 0x4C, 0x4C, 0x4F};
bufferedwriter.write(message, 0, message.length);
bufferedwriter.newLine();
bufferedwriter.flush();
String string;
int x;
while ((x = bufferedreader.read()) != -1)
System.out.println(x);
catch (Exception e)
System.err.println(e.toString());
finally
try
if (s != null)
s.close();
catch (Exception e)
----------8<----------
I have created a keystore with my client key pair in it.
When I run the program I receive no errors or exceptions. All I receive is 5 ENQs and then the program exits...
My question is, since I have not received an exception, can I assume that I have actually connected to the server? They will not tell me if I have connected or not...
Thanks...

If you managed to send and receive data you have negotiated the SSL handshake and made the connection.
After you do that, get the SSLSession from the SSLSocket and have a look at the various things it gives you, such as the peer certiificates and peer principal. This stuff comes from the server.
It's interesting that you didn't need to define a truststore. Try it without the keystore too, to see if they are doing client authentication. If it succeeds without the keystore, they aren't.

Similar Messages

  • Exporting Widescreen - It shouldn't be this difficult!

    Hello all,
    I really hope someone can help me here, I'm a long-term user of Premiere Pro yet I recently upgraded to CS4 with the new media encoder, and simple operations now seem impossible, in this scenerio - exporting a widescreen video...in widescreen!
    I have a video, about 1 minute long. Shot in widescreen. Edited in a Premiere widescreen project and for the export settings: Mov and/or Mpeg and/or WMV, and the DV PAL Widescreen Preset - which then gives me the (unchangeable) frame size of 720x 576. I choose Square Pixels for the ratio selection and export. I get a widescreen video plus letterboxing to give me a 4:3 screen. Seeing as i can't change the frame size, I changed the pixels to Widescreen, and it gives me a 4:3 video without letterboxing, thereby distorting it horribley. I have tried changing everything! Different codecs give me the correct size but a file hundreds and hundreds of MB big. Seriously, it shouldn't be this hard!!
    Please someone, talk some sense!
    Ryan

    The other formats won't let me change the frame size from 720x576.
    If you're attempting to go from a DV source (judging by the screenshot you posted, you are) to a DV output (which you are if you're going to MS DV AVI or to QuickTime DV MOV), you have no other option than to encode at 720x576, period. That's what DV is (in PALLand, anyway; in NTSCVille, it's 720x480). It doesn't matter if you're coming from or going to a standard 4:3 aspect ratio or a widescreen 16:9 aspect ratio, as long as you're using a DV codec your files will alwaysalwaysalways be 720x576. The differentiation between the display aspect ratio or DAR (4:3 or 16:9), therefore, comes from the pixel aspect ratio, or PAR--in other words, what shape are the pixels? For standard DV sources, the pixels' width-to-height ratio is smaller; for widescreen DV sources, the pixels' width-to-height ratio is larger. Note that these are relative, and not absolute, as I'm speaking in generalities about DV--NTSC DV and PAL DV PARs differ. As Jim pointed out, some programs are able to properly read the PAR written into a DV (or other video) file, while some simply read the raw pixel count, which in your case is 720x576. That's why it looks weird and not what you want when played back--the footage is all there, but not drawn as you'd like.
    The only real safe bet, in my mind, is to use square pixels when encoding for computer playback, especially when dealing with less-than-technically-savvy clients. Computers use square pixels, and that's what they like. Encode using square pixels for web playback and local playback formats (like WMV, FLV, H.264, some QT flavors), and you'll avoid the weird stretchies. This does, of course, involve some small amount of computation on your part to determine what is the proper pixel count when using square pixels, but in the case of 16:9 widescreen display, it's usually just a case of dividing your height by 9, and multiplying that result by 16 to get the width. Punch those values into AME, and set your pixel aspect ratio to Square Pixels, and you should be in good shape... pun slightly intended.

  • It can't (shouldn't) be this difficult...

    I've been using a simple home network with my G4 iGloo and a G4 iBook. The iGloo connects to an Ethernet Switch connected to an Airport Extreme which connects to the cable modem. iBook has an Airport card and is used to administer the AEBS. Everything has been great. I even managed to set up both Macs with fixed IP numbers which allows me to have aliases on each Desktop which will accept drag-n-drop file transfers. Now, even if the power fails and the AEBS loses power, it doesn't reassign IP addresses to the Macs.
    OK! Everything is running fine...but I agreed to demo setting up an Airport Network for our User Group tomorrow night! No problem, this stuff is a snap! Or so I thought.
    New Macs to connect to the existing network: G4 mini and a new Intel mini.
    All Macs are using 10.4.10 except the iBook which is still at 10.4.8.
    All Macs can connect to the Internet. All display the other Macs in the "Browse" window (and also in the "Network" Sidebar item in a Finder window).
    From the Intel mini:
    I can connect to my iGloo (wireless to the Airport, Ethernet to the iGloo). I can even connect to a FireWire drive attached to the iGloo and any of the three partitions on the iGloo. Works just like it should!
    I CANNOT connect to the G4 mini (same basic route as above).
    I CANNOT connect to the iBook (wireless to wireless).
    In the last two cases I get the standard, "Unknown user, incorrect password, or login is disabled" dialog.
    From the G4 mini:
    I CANNOT connect to any other Mac. Same standard dialog as above.
    Once again, this Mac DOES connect to the Internet.
    From the iGloo:
    I get the same "Unknown user..." dialog for the G4 mini.
    I can, as stated earlier, connect to either the admin user or the Hard Drive of the iBook.
    The Intel mini presents an "FTP Authentication" dialog(?). What's THAT about?
    From the iBook:
    Connection to the iGloo is perfect.
    It CANNOT connect to either the G4 or the Intel mini.
    Both the minis have "Using:" DHCP. All the machines are withing 10 feet of each other. I found one bad Ethernet cable.
    How many permutations will it take to discover the right combination of settings! Need to have this working within 16 hours, of course! "The difficult will be done immediately, the impossible will take slightly longer!"
    Sincere thanks to anyone who wants to tackle this! 8-)

    As an indication of my frustration level, I clicked on the "Mark as answered" link thinking it said "Mark has answered"! Doh! Stupid me! Again!

  • Live stream to android devices? shouldn't be this difficult.

    Why doesn't Adobe post a simple tutorial on how to stream live video from FMS 4.5 to Android device? The developer center has a tutorial series that hasn't been updated in years. The Part 8: Streaming to Android Devices (to Come) hasn't been updated in 1.5 years. The server is useless if we can't watch video on Android devices. Surely someone out there has successfully streamed live video to an Android device and can explain how to do it?
    Do we need to create an Android Air App to accomplish this?
    Thanks for any help!
    Dave

    As an avid Wowza developer/integrator/consultant (as well as the occasional AMS work), I concur with JayCharles on all of his assertions. The transcoder is completely optional, and you can actually make your own Wowza transcoder module with FFmpeg if the Transcoder AddOn costs are really too steep for deployment.
    Having said that, my current solution for live streaming to Android with an off-the-shelf (OTS) player is JW Player, and setting its fallback property to false. It looks something like this:
    <div id="videoPlayer">
         <!-- Code for non-supported JW Player case. JW Player 6 will not show HLS source on Android. -->
         <video src="http://media_server/app_name/_definst_/mp4:stream_ref/playlist.m3u8" controls ></video>
         <p>Video not playing? <a href="rtsp://media_server/app_name/_definst_/mp4:stream_ref">Click this link to play in an external media player.</a></p>
    </div>
    <script type="text/javascript">
    jwplayer("videoPlayer").setup({
                                                                playlist: [
                                                                                    sources: [
                                                                                                        file: "rtmp://media_server/appname/_definst_/mp4:streamname"
                                                                                                        file: "http://media_server/appname/_definst_/mp4:streamname/playlist.m3u8"
                                                                                    title: "My Sample Live Stream"
                                                                height: 180,
                                                                primary: "html5",
                                                                autostart: false,
                                                                width: 320,
                                                                fallback: false
    </script>
    HTH.

  • UEK2 and ASM/ACFS shouldn't be so difficult

    We are running Oracle 11g Grid Infrastructure (GI) on Oracle Linux 5 x86_64. To pass security audits, we must apply the latest patches every quarter. This includes both Oracle Linux patches and Oracle database patches. Linux patches and Oracle database patches are applied in the same maintenance window.
    We utilize the ACFS feature of 11g GI. ACFS requires a kernel module to match the installed kernel so we must carefully choose our kernel to match what ACFS supports. It has been 10 months since the release of UEK2 and yet the January GI PSU (GI 11.2.0.3.5 PSU Patch 14727347), still does not include support for UEK2. Lenz Grimmer stated a nine month grace period for UEK on Oracle's Linux Blog dated Mar 13 2012. Here is the quote.
    +"Now that the Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel Release 2 has been released, we will continue to provide support for Release 1 of the Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel (2.6.32) in the form of critical bug fixes and security errata for another 9 months. However, new hardware enablement (e.g. by providing device driver updates) will now only be made available through the quarterly updates of Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel Release 2 on the Unbreakable Linux Network. During this grace period, we encourage all customers to switch to Release 2."+
    I have reviewed My Oracle Support article ID 1369107.1 - ACFS Supported On OS Platforms.
    It looks like the only way to run ACFS on UEK2 is to utilize the October GI PSU (14275572) and then apply Patch 12983005 on top of it to get UEK2 support.
    I don't want to be a quarter behind on my patch levels and also have an extra patch to apply just because I want to use ACFS with UEK2. Ultimately I just want to run yum update along with the latest database PSU once a quarter.
    What is the best way to express my dissatisfaction with this scenario and encourage the database team to start supporting UEK2 directly via the GI PSU quarterly process?

    Thanks Avi. I've re-posted in the High Availability » Automatic Storage Management forum.
    UEK2 and ASM/ACFS shouldn't be so difficult
    Edited by: rukbat on Feb 2, 2013 5:09 AM
    Link to that new thread added by moderator.
    That helps future readers follow the topic "wherever it may travel".

  • Connect iPod touch 2G to Reciever using RCA's? It cannot be this difficult?

    Hello!
    Need to connect iPod touch 2G to my reciever using RCA's?
    But +I do not want to use the headphone jack....+ (I heard I will get higher sound quality using the bottom multi-pin connector on the bottom of the touch going to a left and right RCA's) +I have uncompressed (AIFF) files on my iPod touch and want the best sound quality possible.+
    I found a couple companies that make these cables with one being the Cables To Go 4-Feet RCA Stereo to Dock Connector Cable for iPod and also the Nyko Stereo Link for iPod, but from reading the reviews on Amazon neither of them will work with the Touch 2g (or the iPhone for that matter).
    I am also open to a simple dock of some sort that would provide me RCA outputs. Seems as if Apples universal dock would be great but it seems to have NO RCA outputs on the back of it.
    If anyone has a solution to this I would be very very happy!
    +I have looked high and low for a solution for this seemingly simple task.+
    All I want is a connector that goes from the bottom of the touch to 2 RCA's so I can input this into
    my home stereo so I can listen to my ripped CD's in high quality. A dock would also work too! I do not need charging or anything fancy....
    (already have try the Tekkeon NavDock for iPod which was cool because I could watch my videos on tv from my touch but i dont need that)
    +*just looking for something simple that works with the iPod Touch 2G.*+
    *It cannot be this difficult?*
    thanks, techo

    As I stated above, the docking connector is not a "true" line-out, it does have a volume-tap so the volume control will work. It probably is somewhat cleaner than the headphone out (haven't measured it), but it is not going to be a significant difference as any improvement you get from the connector is severely limited by the DAC in the iPod.
    You get no improvement in sound from using the pins on the 30 pin connector versus a 3.5 mm jack. If you buy a Universal Dock it is passing the signal from the 30 pin dock to a 3.5mm female jack, then you use the 3.5mm to RCA. Going directly from the dock connector to RCA will not improve the sound, the 3.5mm connector is not inferior in itself to the RCA connectors.
    The A/V kit will get you the ability to watch your videos on your TV and output the stereo signal to your receiver. If you want even better sound for your music, get an Apple TV and use the HDMI cable to transfer the video and sound:
    http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shopipod/family/appletv?mco=MTE4MTU

  • Trying to restore my iPhone 5 from a backup but its says that it will take over 24 hours to finish. Is there something I can try to do to speed this up? I feel like it shouldn't take this long

    So I have been restoring my iPhone5 from a backup for about 3 hours now however iTunes still says that it is going to take over 24 hours to complete the restore process and the progress bar hasn't moved much at all. I feel like something has gone wrong somehow and it shouldn't take this long to complete. Is there something I can do to speed up this process or do I just have to try to wait it out? I'm scared to just unplug my phone and try again since it might screw something up.

    if u unplug then that could put ur device into recovery mode. i would wait

  • Adobe Presenter - Why does Adobe have to be this difficult

    Well, today I wanted to sign up to use Presenter......  I did my 30 days and I WAS ready to make a commitment!!!!  That was until I went to make my commitment and Presenter is NOT listed anywhere!!!  So how am I to purchase this product when it's NOT an option.
    Even more so, when I try and contact Adobe to get some help, this is the only place I can go!!!!
    Why does it have to be this difficult?  Why can I not contact someone that can help me????
    I guess maybe I need to more on to Articulate.  I'm sure they would be happy to take my money!

    Creative Cloud chat support (all Creative Cloud customer service issues)
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-ccm.html

  • My SSL VPN page generates this error after upgrade to 4.0: ssl_error_renegotiation_not_allowed

    My company provides a SSL VPN option for Mac users. This worked flawlessly - I would login, my certificate would be presented to the server and I would be authenticated.
    Now, with 4.0, after I login and before the certificate is presented I receive this error: ssl_error_renegotiation_not_allowed
    Any ideas what changed with 4.0?
    Also, any way to get 3.16 back?
    Thanks!

    A column in the search results was changed to a Simple Checkbox when we upgraded to 4.0 (it has always been a checkbox in the older APEX versions). When I put it back to Standard Report Column I no longer get the page not found error.
    Is there some additional/different setting I need to do in order to use the simple checkbox option in a search results set?
    ETA: I see now that Checkboxes are not intended to work in standard report regions so I'll change them to LOVs or something and my problem should be solved.
    Edited by: mimi_jones on Jul 18, 2011 6:16 AM

  • Is there any reason I shouldn't work this way?

    Given the lack of batch capture in FCE is there any reason why I shouldn't work in the following way:
    1. Import video in large chunks using capture now
    2. Use DV start stop and Make sub-clip
    3. Export just the sub-clips I want as self-contained movies
    4. Close the project and delete the original capture files and the FCE project file
    5. Start a new project and import the movies I saved in step 3.
    My reasons for wanting to do this are mainly to save disc space but also to reduce clutter in the bins. So far as I can see this works fine. The only downsides I can see are:
    1. The extra time it takes but this is offset against the chore of capturing individual clips instead of using capture now.
    2. The fact that reimported clips have their audio tracks set to mono mix but it seems easy enough to correct this. (As an aside, if I import a .mov file saved from Quicktime it imports into FCE with the audio set to stereo - why the difference?).
    I'd be happy enough working this way, I think, provided I could be confident that I'm not going to lose quality by saving and then re-importing. Will I? Are there any other downsides I've not thought of?

    You shouldn't lose any quality in the audio or video, but you may lose the timecode track. I'm not sure if you'll lose it, but if you do, you won't be able to recapture the project clips from the original tape because the timecode would be required. This isn't an issue, if you don't ever need to recapture. The timecode may even be retained... I'd have to do an export to see. As a matter of workflow, you may want to think seriously about keeping the timecode, because you can back-up your project file and have some assurance that you can recover from a chatastrophic failure simply by restoring the project file and recapturing from the original tape.
    Regarding your audio and video; unless you were to add effects to the video, there should be no loss in exporting and importing. Losses in DV are incurred when you add filters (alter the image) and recompress. The audio is uncompressed PCM, so no losses to be had there, unless you change the sampling rate.

  • Shouldn't be this hard

    Well, I did manage to get my Droid DNA back, which is all I wanted in the first place, AND, after almost 2 hours on the phone, this one hasn't dropped a call (fingers and toes crossed, knocking on all the wood I can find), so it is possible to get some help from Verizon.
    My problem is with the company policies that made it impossible for the Customer Care reps to provide service. I got frustrated with them, and I'm sure they with me, but some corporate suit(s) are to blame, and they really need to rethink some of their decisions.
    But I am happy and it was well worth the effort - even though it should NEVER EVER have been as difficult as it was.
    The DNA is a fantastic phone, and my next phone will probably be another HTC as well. For folks that don't know, HTC phones are also the only phones that will receive MMS with data turned off :-) (for data misers like myself)
    Woohoo!

    I like the HTC ONE but don't like lwhat they did to the bottom 3 buttons. Should be Menu, Home, Back. Not Back, HTC logo, Home.
    I'll wait for the next one too.....

  • Premiere Pro CS6 - Shouldn't be THIS slow..?

    Hi All,
    I have the following spec machine:
    Macbook Pro 2.4 Core i7 (Late 2011) 16GB RAM
    Running Mac OS X 10.8
    1x LaCie Thunderbolt drive (media)
    1x USB 2.0 scratch disk (media cache)
    Local 512Gb SSD (project files)
    Set up like the above surely shouldn't be staggering along with fans blazing? I currently have a 2 minute video sequence 1920x1080 with 1x adjustment layer for colour correction TURNED OFF and it still can't play back properly even at half the quality...
    Is the above setup wrong? I was always taught to split the locations of project files, media and cache... Happy to listen to anyone who knows better though? Thunderbolt drive is so fast so why oh why is this struggling..
    Auto graphics switching is also OFF so it isn't that..
    Andy

    Sorry to hijack this thread, but I've also been experiencing super slow performance with Premiere Pro CS6.
    My setup is as follows:
    MacBook Pro
    2.2GHz i7
    8GB DDR3 RAM
    500GB Harddrive with 30GB available
    AMD Radeon HD 6750M
    I'm editing footage from a 550D DSLR, which comes out the camera in H264 format.
    The project I'm currently working on should by no means be very processor intensive. It simply cuts between 10 different shots of a person talking to the camera, and there are only 13 video clips imported into the project.
    I experienced very choppy and slow playback until I read your post Greg. I had GPU acceleration turned on, so I decided to try turning it off. I instantly noticed improved performance. Is my machine simply not cut out for GPU acceleration?
    Thanks,
    Jonnie.

  • Should using MacBook Pro really be this difficult???

    Here's my question - should I return this Mac and just buy something else or should I attempt to continue to go ahead with using this brand new Mac I just purchased?
    I'm really not happy with Apple's new MacBookPro and as much as I hate PCs, I'm just thinking that they might be the lesser of the evil here. I have had such an incredibly difficult time with this brand new Mac and it has been such a nightmarish experience trying to use it, I really have to ask that question here. I have just sent the thing off to a technician for an hourly fee to try and get it up and running. He got some things going at my studio but others were appearing to take so long, we decided it best for him to take it to his shop to work on it.
    I've had out of the box 1 nightmare after another trying to get going with it. Compared to my past experience with my Powerbook and other Macs, this has really just blown me and my hopes about working on my new Mac out of the water and I've had so many problems with it, I have just not been able to figure out where to post for help here.
    It took 3 hours with my ISP on the phone to get my email and internet connection up and running (was automatic with my old Powerbook), the new MBP couldn't talk to the printer (old PB connected to printer using wireless via the printer being on appletalk talking to modem via ethernet, wireless router allowed the wireless connection and the PB never had a problem with this), scanner worked once and never again, mouse lost its settings (mouse purchased at Apple store), iWork application suite I purchased from Apple and ordered to be installed on the new Mac - this stuff required entering s/n number (which I was told was supposed to have been done when the software was installed - had to go get box and find disks, etc.), web sites were incredibly slow to load and pages would hang... and apparently there were a lot of updates to all of the required software from Apple that had not been put on the machine yet.
    The technician I hired will be charging around $200 to get the computer up and running and working with everything. Would ProCare have been able to do this? Probably not unless I brought in printer, router, modem, and scanner to the store - or am I mistaken on this? How would Apple's care have been able to have supported me here?
    Should I return the Mac altogether given the depth and amount of problems I'm having doing anything? Would an iMac have been better? Should I just give up on Macs now with this new OS and Intel chip?
    Even having now to spend this additional money, I'm VERY worried that I will end up then having to spend even more money for some other problem that may arise after this given this auspicious start. I'm really really worried that MacBook Pro is just not very dependable at least in comparison to the PowerBook I had and loved for the past several years. What do you think? What's your experience?
    Message was edited by: Actually Human

    Yes. I think you're right about this.
    But I'm not at all new to Macs and used to myself work for Apple as part of the design folks. The experience I'm having right now is NOT the norm with Macs... AT ALL. Apple has been a leader if not THEE leader in usability where computers are concerned and they have been since their birth. Many many many $ and time at least used to be spent in targeting specific usability metrics. I firmly believe that what has happened here is a combo of your observation along WITH what has happened here and there in the past at Apple - the usability group/s demonstrate a clear need and solution for problems such as I'm having (I know - I've witnessed this). Decision makers or 1 decision maker at a higher level "rules" out the proposed solution. The consequences are errors and problems that you can read throughout the entire discussion board here - various problems people have are not necessarily because a solution has not been proposed, found, known, and pushed forward at Apple but is because someone/s rule out that solution being executed... the time/money business.
    The group, when I was in it, would have been livid and fired up had they seen what I have just been through trying to get going with this new Mac ...and I am no stranger to Macs and am not a new user and know my way around a Mac a lot more than most users.
    It has now been 2 weeks that I've had my new Mac and I've not been able to do anything with it due to the enormous problems. I hired a former genius bar guy who has gone out on his own to see what he can do. Unfortunately, the genius bar at the Apple store can't come to me (and I can't bring printer, scanner, router, modem down to the store with the computer - even harder for me since I'm disabled) so I hired this guy to come to me and see what he could do. There were so many problems with the thing, he has taken the computer back to his shop where he's going to find out whether the box is simply a bum Mac from the get go or whether it just needs a lot more tweaking and configuring than was led to have been the case from the outset.
    Some helpful info from him to keep in mind - I got my new Mac online from the Apple store here. He told me that actual human beings are preparing these Macs before they go out to customers. The preparation of the boxes can vary depending upon the experience of whoever is preparing one's new Mac. If the guy/gal was fairly new and didn't now all that much... he was saying you don't know if everything that was supposed to be updated at that time or included or checked GOT checked or included. He told me, for example, s/n number for software I purchased that I ordered them to install at the factory SHOULD have been entered already allowing me to get up and running immediately upon launching the software.
    Also he told me - there are a lot of folks here, as we can all imagine, who purport to be very expert and sound good but he told me there is a plethora of just plain false information and incorrect info all over these boards. For example, when I first posted with problems here, I was told the Migration Assistant doesn't work to migrate stuff from non-Intel-based Macs to Intel based Macs. He told me that is absolutely BS and he has used MA to do that very thing. He told me if there were a problem, it's due to other stuff... example, not ALL software on the computer (either one) have been updated or updates weren't completed or there was a glitch in an update or there is a low level problem that wasn't sussed out (in my case, for example, the FIRST thing he did was run DUtility on the SOURCE computer and repair ANYthing or any naming or any problem whatsoever on the HFS there... this is before doing ANYthing). Ok, not a single person here mentioned starting with that before even touching the new computer. This is why I really tend to believe those genius bar guys/gals that there is an unfortunate amount of mis-information here on these boards that is even more unfortunately passed off by the poster (not by Apple) as being all knowing and authoritative. And myself having worked for Apple, I also know (going back to your original post here) that usability and the design history at Apple is quite different than your current understanding and expectation of Macs. You need to raise the bar you've been using now that you're using a Mac. That's what the Mac is all about - usability. It is the primary way Apple has become a leader in everything it touches and its why long time users like myself are really shocked and affected when the user experience is as poor as its become for me.
    I WILL be taking this up with members of CHI because it really needs to be discussed and addressed. Have we lowered the bar. For Mac users, Mandy, it was NOT always as you have accepted it to be.

  • It can't be this difficult.. help!

    How can i preview and change the pre-existing ringtones on the Blackberry? I just got this phone a day ago and i'm quite confused. The user manual says nothing about it. I'm not interested in paying for ringtones when there are plenty that already come with the phone. I've done all the so called difficult tasks such as set up email addresses but i cannot for the life of me figure out how i can change the ringtone. I don't mean assign a specific ring to one person but for all calls, in general. If i could just listen to what the tone sounds like.. how do i do it? Also, how do i assign an alert tone to notify me of a newly recieved text or email message?  I appreciate any pointers or suggestions. Many thanks.

    Thank you very much, Timbuck2! That worked. One additional question: how can i assign one of those ringtones for a text message alert? There doesn't seem to be anything here that allows me to do that, perhaps i am missing something? Thanks in advance.

  • I'm using my iPad with iOS v 6.1.3- is there a security patch for the SSL/TLS vulnerability for this, or do I have to go to 7.0.6?

    I'm using my iPad with iOS 6.1.3. Is there a security patch for this version, or do I have to update to iOS 7.0.6?

    There is an update for iOS 6... v6.1.6. But it is only available to iPhone 3GS and iPod touch 4th gen users. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6146?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US
    For iPad, the highest supported os for iOS 6 is v6.1.3. If you want to get the security patch, you'll have to go to iOS 7.0.6.
    Hope this answers your question.
    ~Joe

Maybe you are looking for